Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Risk Factors Associated with Disease Recurrence in Patients with Stage III/IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity Treated with Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy

ANISHA R. NOBLE, JOHN F. GRESKOVICH, JAEHONG HAN, CHANDANA A. REDDY, TOBENNA I. NWIZU, MUMTAZ F. KHAN, JOSEPH SCHARPF, DAVID J. ADELSTEIN, BRIAN B. BURKEY and SHLOMO A. KOYFMAN
Anticancer Research February 2016, 36 (2) 785-792;
ANISHA R. NOBLE
1Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOHN F. GRESKOVICH
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JAEHONG HAN
1Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHANDANA A. REDDY
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOBENNA I. NWIZU
3Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MUMTAZ F. KHAN
4Head and Neck Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOSEPH SCHARPF
4Head and Neck Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAVID J. ADELSTEIN
3Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BRIAN B. BURKEY
4Head and Neck Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHLOMO A. KOYFMAN
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: koyfmas@ccf.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the present study was to identify variables associated with high risk of failure in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (SCC-OC). Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 191 patients with stage III-IVb SCC-OC treated with post-operative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between 1995 and 2013. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed; variables associated with inferior DFS were identified. Results: Seventy-five patients (39%) recurred. DFS and five-year OS were 52% and 54%, respectively. Poorly differentiated tumors (p=0.03), recurrent tumors (p=0.02) and high nodal ratio (p=0.02) were associated with an increased risk of recurrence. CRT was associated with improved DFS in patients with positive margins and/or extracapsular extension (p=0.021). Conclusion: Tumors that are recurrent, high grade, or have high nodal ratio are at risk of recurrence. Presence of these disease features should be taken into consideration for better risk stratification.

  • Squamous cell carcinoma
  • chemoradiotherapy
  • disease-free survival
  • head and neck neoplasms
  • risk factors
  • neoplasm recurrence
  • survival rate

Squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity (SCC-OC) represent a heterogeneous group of head and neck cancers with an estimated incidence of 30,260 in 2015 (1). Research over the last thirty years reveals a decrease in incidence of SCC-OC – a trend possibly attributable to a decline in smoking – and an increase in incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (2-5). Despite the decline in SCC-OC incidence, the majority of patients continue to present with advanced stage (III/IV) disease and outcomes in this cohort remain sub-optimal when compared to other head and neck sites (6-10). Even with significantly improved survival rates over the past two decades due to advanced imaging and treatment modalities, 5-year survival for patients with advanced-stage SCC-OC remains low at 33-42% with locoregional recurrence rates ranging from 16–35% following adjuvant radiation (RT) (11-18).

There remains a considerable knowledge gap on the fundamental issue of risk stratification in this patient population. What specific tumor-related factors account for an aggressive phenotype and disproportionately high rates of recurrence in a disease from which most patients are cured? In the initial MD Anderson randomized study investigating various PORT dosing schemes in HNSCC, Peters and colleagues devised a points-based risk stratification scheme for primary tumor and nodal characteristics to help stratify patients by their anticipated recurrence risks (19). This included size of tumor, degree of nerve involvement, extent of negative margin, number and size of lymph nodes and degree of ECE (microscopic vs. macroscopic). In addition to identifying ECE as the strongest single risk factor, they also observed that as the number of less powerful prognostic factors increased in combination with one another, locoregional control worsened proportionately. Recent studies – twenty years later – have observed the same phenomenon (20, 21). While positive margins and ECE have been identified as predictive factors of benefit from the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to postoperative radiotherapy, these factors do not appear to adequately predict outcome overall (22).

How patient, tumor and treatment-related factors interact with each other and influence outcome is still not well-defined. In this study, we sought to review our experience with locally advanced oral cavity cancer treated with multimodality therapy with the aim of identifying how clinical and pathological variables interact to predict for disease specific outcomes. Recognition of prognostic and potentially predictive factors would thereby allow for more rational clinical trial design and exploring the potential of personalizing adjuvant therapy regimens based on risk profiles.

Patients and Methods

Patients with stage III-IVb squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity treated with surgical resection and PORT at the Cleveland Clinic between 1995 and 2013 were identified from an IRB-approved head and neck cancer registry. Primary (81%) and recurrent (19%) tumors were eligible for study inclusion; patients with prior RT were excluded.

Surgical resection of the primary tumor was performed in all patients with the goal of achieving negative margins. Intraoperative frozen-section assessment was used and marginal clearance was attempted on patients with initially involved margins. Lymph node dissection was performed when indicated. Nodal ratio was defined as the number of pathologically positive lymph nodes in proportion to the total number of lymph nodes removed.

Adjuvant RT was administered to a dose of 60-66 Gy to the tumor/lymphatic bed and 50-56 Gy to elective nodal regions. Radiotherapy was delivered using a conventional 3-field technique (3DRT) or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). Prior to publication of the RTOG (#9501) and EORTC (#22931) studies in 2004, concurrent chemotherapy was not standardly used in our patient cohort. With publishing of these guidelines, concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy was offered to patients with positive margins and/or extracapsular extension (22). All patients received multidisciplinary follow-up according to standard guidelines (23).

Disease recurrence included local, regional and/or distant failure. Recurrences were considered events in the disease free survival (DFS) analysis. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to determine DFS. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression to identify patient, tumor, and treatment related variables associated with inferior DFS. A p-value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results

Out of the 191 patients who met eligibility criteria included in this study, the majority were Caucasians (87%), males (57%) and current or former smokers (67%). Median age was 61, KPS was 90 and median follow-up time was 23 months (range=1-197 months). The two most common primary sites were mobile tongue (46%) and floor of mouth (22%). T4a tumors comprised of 37% of patients while the minority (9%) had N2c-3 disease. All patients were treated with post-operative RT; 51 (27%) were treated with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Overall, 39 (20%) had positive margins and 64 (34%) had ECE (Table I).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

DFS for all patients.

Overall survival for this patient cohort was 54% and five-year DFS was 52% (Figure 1). Prognostic factors for disease-free survival identified by MVA included poorly differentiated (PD) tumors (p=0.0285, HR=1.811), increasing nodal ratio (p=0.0240, HR=1.037) and recurrent tumors (p=0.0214, HR=1.963; Table II). Five-year DFS for patients with PD tumors (40% vs. 58%; p=0.005) and recurrent disease (26% vs. 58%; p=0.006) were significantly inferior to those without these risk factors (Figure 2). DFS of patients with ECE (44% vs. 55%; p=0.38) or positive margins (50% vs. 52%; p=0.86) was statistically similar to DFS of patients without these traditionally high-risk features (Figure 3).

Disease recurrence occurred in 75 patients (39%), mostly at the primary site (24%), followed by distant (17%) and regional sites (7%). Forty-four patients (73%) with locoregional recurrence underwent salvage therapy and fourteen (32%) were successfully salvaged with no evidence of disease.

Discussion

Poorly differentiated tumors, increasing nodal ratio and recurrent tumors were identified as prognostic factors of disease recurrence and patients with these features had poor survival outcomes. Five year DFS within this patient cohort was 52%, comparable to other reports of SCC-OC treated with adjuvant RT (11, 12, 14, 17).

Increased nodal burden has been established as an adverse prognostic factor in SCC-OC; despite these findings, high nodal ratio in SCC-OC has not previously been considered a high-risk disease feature warranting intensification of therapy (22, 24, 25). An ongoing randomized phase II RTOG (#1221) study examining post-operative CRT versus definitive CRT in HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) uses the presence of ≥5 metastatic lymph nodes (in addition to positive margins and/or ECE) to identify patients as high-risk (26). Our results support the use of similar risk stratification in SCC-OC for patients with high nodal ratio.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with inferior DFS.

Our identification of recurrent tumors as prognostic factors for disease recurrence supports strong consideration of intensified adjuvant therapy in this patient cohort, regardless of the presence of other traditionally high-risk features at the time of initial evaluation. Results from our study also show that poorly differentiated tumors are associated with significantly poorer outcomes, an association that may reflect underlying tumor biology as a primary driver of recurrence. Researchers have explored tumor histology as a potential factor affecting disease outcome and have found poorly differentiated tumors to be strongly correlated with suboptimal outcomes (27, 28). Others have incorporated tumor grade, pattern of invasion, lymphocytic response and degree of keratinization to create a histological risk assessment model (29, 30). Utilization of this model showed that an infiltrative pattern of invasion and limited lymphocytic response demonstrated a strong association with poor overall and disease-free survival in patients with SCC-OC (29, 30). Our study did not examine these factors in detail – which may have had an impact on our final results. According to current treatment recommendations, patients with positive margins and/or ECE are considered high-risk and qualify for concurrent CRT in their treatment course (22). In our study, neither positive margins nor ECE were predictive of poor outcomes overall.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

DFS according to tumor type and cell differentiation.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Disease-free survival by ECE and margin status.

Recurrence rates for advanced HNSCC remain high despite use of multimodal therapy (31-33). Outcomes following recurrence are suboptimal with approximately 30-45% five-year overall survival following salvage surgery (34, 35, 10). A review of studies published in the last two decades reveals variability in the identification of risk factors in SCC-OC (Table IV). Studies that first identified the prognostic roles of positive margins and ECE in the early 2000s also found smoking, perineural invasion (PNI) and N2 disease as risk factors for disease recurrence (36, 37, 22, 38). In 2007, Fan and colleagues published their analysis of 201 patients treated with post-operative RT for advanced SCC-OC, confirming the correlation between multiple positive nodes, ECE and higher-grade tumors with worse DFS (39). That group later updated this study and found that only T4 stage and absence of chemotherapy were predictors of poor outcome (40). Other studies have suggested that increased package time and presence of more than four positive lymph nodes puts patients at high risk of failure (14, 41). Liao and colleagues offered a broader list of disease features including PD tumors, lymphatic invasion, tumor depth ≥11mm, N2 disease and ECE as significant risk factors (14, 41, 42). The role of ECE was further elucidated in a 2015 study at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center that identified tumor extension >1.7 mm beyond the nodal capsule as a poor prognostic factor in disease-free survival (43). The heterogeneity of reported risk factors in advanced SCC-OC has made it difficult to appropriately tailor treatment planning in patients and may be accountable for persistently sub-optimal recurrence rates in this population. These findings emphasize the limitations of using clinical features of disease to accurately risk stratify patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Summary of studies examining prognostic factors for inferior DFS in SCC-OC.

Genomic profiling represents a novel approach to patients with advanced SCC-OC, offering the potential to identify clinically significant molecular biomarkers. Early studies revealed overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in up to 90% of HNSCC prompting investigation and approval of EGFR-inhibitor cetuximab as a therapeutic option (44-46). In 2004, Chung and colleagues further investigated gene expression patterns from 60 HNSCC samples revealing four distinct tumor sub-types with significant differences in disease-free survival and patterns of EGFR pathway activation (47). The Pan-Cancer initiative launched by the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project confirmed the complex, heterogeneous nature of HNSCC with a recognition of abnormalities at genomic, epigenomic and proteomic levels across tumor lineages (48). Efforts have been made to identify salivary protein biomarkers specific to SCC-OC with the understanding that presence of these biomarkers in otherwise asymptomatic patients could allow for early detection of SCC-OC (49). Others have sought to identify patterns of gene expression within SCC-OC tumor cells that portend a worse outcome (50). While this type of research is in its early stages, molecular profiling of tumors offers considerable potential as a more reliable tool for improved risk stratification and subsequently improved treatment modifications in this disease.

There are several limitations to this study. As a retrospective review of a single-institution experience, this study is subject to physician and selection biases. Additionally, treatment modalities and indications have evolved over the 18 years during which patients in this study were treated. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was not given to all patients who would currently be considered appropriate candidates for such treatment, which may have compromised overall outcomes. We were also unable to ascertain all histological features of the tumor, including microscopic versus macroscopic ECE, and whether it demonstrated an infiltrative pattern of invasion and/or a limited lymphocytic response – all of which may have prognostic implications. Finally, while recurrent disease is clearly a risk factor for recurrence, including these patients may have led to increased heterogeneity of our cohort and obscured potential findings in the de novo population.

In conclusion, rates of disease recurrence for patients with stage III/IV SCC-OC treated with surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy are high. Tumors that were recurrent, high grade, or had a high nodal ratio were at significantly higher risk of recurrence. Intensification strategies and improved risk stratification based on genomic profiling is needed for this patient population.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received October 1, 2015.
  • Revision received December 20, 2015.
  • Accepted December 21, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller K,
    3. Jemal A
    : Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65(1): 5-29, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Shiboski CH,
    2. Shiboski SC,
    3. Silverman S Jr.
    : Trends in oral cancer rates in the United States, 1973-1996. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 28(4): 249-256, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schantz SP,
    2. Yu GP
    : Head and neck cancer incidence trends in young Americans, 1973-1997, with a special analysis for tongue cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(3): 268-274, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shiboski CH,
    2. Schmidt BL,
    3. Jordan RC
    : Tongue and tonsil carcinoma: increasing trends in the U.S. population ages 20-44 years. Cancer 103(9): 1843-1849, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Chaturvedi AK,
    2. Engels EA,
    3. Anderson WF,
    4. Gillison ML
    : Incidence trends for human papillomavirus-related and - unrelated oral squamous cell carcinomas in the United States. J Clin Oncol 26(4): 612-619, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Amdur RJ,
    2. Parsons JT,
    3. Mendenhall WM,
    4. Million RR,
    5. Stringer SP,
    6. Cassisi NJ
    : Postoperative irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an analysis of treatment results and complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 16(1): 25-36, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Arnold DJ,
    2. Goodwin WJ,
    3. Weed DT,
    4. Civantos FJ
    : Treatment of recurrent and advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Semin Radiat Oncol 14(2): 190-195, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dinshaw KA,
    2. Agarwal JP,
    3. Laskar SG,
    4. Gupta T,
    5. Shrivastava SK,
    6. Cruz V
    : Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the role of post-operative adjuvant radiotherapy. J Surg Oncol 91(1): 48-55, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Furness S,
    2. Glenny AM,
    3. Worthington HV,
    4. Pavitt S,
    5. Oliver R,
    6. Clarkson JE,
    7. Macluskey M,
    8. Chan KK,
    9. Conway DI
    : Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(4): CD006386. 2011.
  5. ↵
    1. Zafereo M
    : Surgical salvage of recurrent cancer of the head and neck. Curr Oncol Rep 16(5): 386, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Yao M,
    2. Chang K,
    3. Funk GF,
    4. Lu H,
    5. Tan H,
    6. Wacha J,
    7. Dornfeld KJ,
    8. Buatti JM
    : The failure patterns of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy-the university of iowa experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(5): 1332-1341, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Gomez DR,
    2. Zhung JE,
    3. Gomez J,
    4. Chan K,
    5. Wu AJ,
    6. Wolden SL,
    7. Pfister DG,
    8. Shaha A,
    9. Shah JP,
    10. Kraus DH,
    11. Wong RJ,
    12. Lee NY
    : Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in postoperative treatment of oral cavity cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(4): 1096-1103, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen AM,
    2. Farwell DG,
    3. Luu Q,
    4. Chen LM,
    5. Vijayakumar S,
    6. Purdy JA
    : Marginal misses after postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80(5): 1423-1429, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Daly ME,
    2. Le QT,
    3. Kozak MM,
    4. Maxim PG,
    5. Murphy JD,
    6. Hsu A,
    7. Loo V Jr..,
    8. Kaplan MJ,
    9. Fischbein NJ,
    10. Chang DT
    : Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: patterns of failure and predictors of local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80(5): 1412-1422, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Studer G,
    2. Brown M,
    3. Bredell M,
    4. Graetz KW,
    5. Huber G,
    6. Linsenmeier C,
    7. Najafi Y,
    8. Riesterer O,
    9. Rordorf T,
    10. Schmid S,
    11. Glanzmann C
    : Follow up after IMRT in oral cavity cancer: update. Radiat Oncol 7: 84, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Amit M,
    2. Yen TC,
    3. Liao CT,
    4. Chaturvedi P,
    5. Agarwal JP,
    6. Kowalski LP,
    7. Ebrahimi A,
    8. Clark JR,
    9. Kreppel M,
    10. Zoller J,
    11. Fridman E,
    12. Bolzoni VA,
    13. Shah JP,
    14. Binenbaum Y,
    15. Patel SG,
    16. Gil Z
    : Improvement in survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: An international collaborative study. Cancer 119(24): 4242-4248, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chan AK,
    2. Huang SH,
    3. Le LW,
    4. Yu E,
    5. Dawson LA,
    6. Kim JJ,
    7. Cho BC,
    8. Bayley AJ,
    9. Ringash J,
    10. Goldstein D,
    11. Chan K,
    12. Waldron J,
    13. O'Sullivan B,
    14. Cummings B,
    15. Hope AJ
    : Postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy following surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: patterns of failure. Oral Oncol 49(3): 255-260, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Howlader N,
    2. Krapcho M,
    3. Garshell J,
    4. Neyman N,
    5. Altekruse SF,
    6. Kosary CL,
    7. Yu M,
    8. Ruhl J,
    9. Tatalovich Z,
    10. Cho H,
    11. Mariotto A,
    12. Lewis DR,
    13. Chen HS,
    14. Feuer EJ,
    15. Cronin KA
    : SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2010, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, Md., National Cancer Institute, 2013.
  11. ↵
    1. Peters LJ,
    2. Goepfert H,
    3. Ang KK,
    4. Byers RM,
    5. Maor MH,
    6. Guillamondegui O,
    7. Morrison WH,
    8. Weber RS,
    9. Garden AS,
    10. Frankenthaler RA
    : Evaluation of the dose for postoperative radiation therapy of head and neck cancer: first report of a prospective randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26(1): 3-11, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Ch'ng S,
    2. Corbett-Burns S,
    3. Stanton N,
    4. Gao K,
    5. Shannon K,
    6. Clifford A,
    7. Gupta R,
    8. Clark JR
    : Close margin alone does not warrant postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 119(13): 2427-2437, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Wang SJ,
    2. Patel SG,
    3. Shah JP,
    4. Goldstein DP,
    5. Irish JC,
    6. Carvalho AL,
    7. Kowalski LP,
    8. Lockhart JL,
    9. Holland JM,
    10. Gross ND
    : An oral cavity carcinoma nomogram to predict benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(6): 554-559, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Bernier J,
    2. Cooper JS,
    3. Pajak TF,
    4. van Glabbeke M,
    5. Bourhis J,
    6. Forastiere A,
    7. Ozsahin EM,
    8. Jacobs JR,
    9. Jassem J,
    10. Ang KK,
    11. Lefebvre JL
    : Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck 27(10): 843-850, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Network, NCC
    . Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology - Head and Neck Cancers (Version 2.2014). Retrieved November 29, 2014, from http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck.pdf.
  16. ↵
    1. Gil Z,
    2. Carlson DL,
    3. Boyle JO,
    4. Kraus DH,
    5. Shah JP,
    6. Shaha AR,
    7. Singh B,
    8. Wong RJ,
    9. Patel SG
    : Lymph node density is a significant predictor of outcome in patients with oral cancer. Cancer 115(24): 5700-5710, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Patel SG,
    2. Amit M,
    3. Yen TC,
    4. Liao CT,
    5. Chaturvedi P,
    6. Agarwal JP,
    7. Kowalski LP,
    8. Ebrahimi A,
    9. Clark JR,
    10. Cernea CR,
    11. Brandao SJ,
    12. Kreppel M,
    13. Zoller J,
    14. Fliss D,
    15. Fridman E,
    16. Bachar G,
    17. Shpitzer T,
    18. Bolzoni VA,
    19. Patel PR,
    20. Jonnalagadda S,
    21. Robbins KT,
    22. Shah JP,
    23. Gil Z
    : Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research. Br J Cancer 109(8): 2087-2095, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Holsinger FC
    : Randomized Phase II Trial of Transoral Endoscopic Head and Neck Surgery Followed by Risk-Based IMRT and Weekly Cisplatin versus IMRT and Weekly Cisplatin for HPV Negative Oropharynx Cancer, 2014.
  19. ↵
    1. Liao CT,
    2. Lin CY,
    3. Fan KH,
    4. Wang HM,
    5. Ng SH,
    6. Lee LY,
    7. Hsueh C,
    8. Chen IH,
    9. Huang SF,
    10. Kang CJ,
    11. Yen TC
    : Identification of a high-risk group among patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and pT1-2N0 disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(1): 284-290, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Thomas B,
    2. Stedman M,
    3. Davies L
    : Grade as a prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis of the data. Laryngoscope 124(3): 688-694, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Brandwein-Gensler M,
    2. Teixeira MS,
    3. Lewis CM,
    4. Lee B,
    5. Rolnitzky L,
    6. Hille JJ,
    7. Genden E,
    8. Urken ML,
    9. Wang BY
    : Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol 29(2): 167-178, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Brandwein-Gensler M,
    2. Smith RV,
    3. Wang B,
    4. Penner C,
    5. Theilken A,
    6. Broughel D,
    7. Schiff B,
    8. Owen RP,
    9. Smith J,
    10. Sarta C,
    11. Hebert T,
    12. Nason R,
    13. Ramer M,
    14. DeLacure M,
    15. Hirsch D,
    16. Myssiorek D,
    17. Heller K,
    18. Prystowsky M,
    19. Schlecht NF,
    20. Negassa A
    : Validation of the histologic risk model in a new cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 34(5): 676-688, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Bernier J,
    2. Domenge C,
    3. Ozsahin M,
    4. Matuszewska K,
    5. Lefebvre JL,
    6. Greiner RH,
    7. Giralt J,
    8. Maingon P,
    9. Rolland F,
    10. Bolla M,
    11. Cognetti F,
    12. Bourhis J,
    13. Kirkpatrick A,
    14. van Glabbeke M
    : Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 350(19): 1945-1952, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cooper JS,
    2. Pajak TF,
    3. Forastiere AA,
    4. Jacobs J,
    5. Campbell BH,
    6. Saxman SB,
    7. Kish JA,
    8. Kim HE,
    9. Cmelak AJ,
    10. Rotman M,
    11. Machtay M,
    12. Ensley JF,
    13. Chao KS,
    14. Schultz CJ,
    15. Lee N,
    16. Fu KK
    : Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 350(19): 1937-1944, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ow TJ,
    2. Myers JN
    : Current management of advanced resectable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 4(1): 1-10, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Liu SA,
    2. Wong YK,
    3. Lin JC,
    4. Poon CK,
    5. Tung KC,
    6. Tsai WC
    : Impact of recurrence interval on survival of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients after local relapse. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(1): 112-118, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Liao CT,
    2. Chang JT,
    3. Wang HM,
    4. Ng SH,
    5. Hsueh C,
    6. Lee LY,
    7. Lin CH,
    8. Chen IH,
    9. Huang SF,
    10. Cheng AJ,
    11. Yen TC
    : Salvage therapy in relapsed squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: how and when? Cancer 112(1): 94-103, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. El-Husseiny G,
    2. Kandil A,
    3. Jamshed A,
    4. Khafaga Y,
    5. Saleem M,
    6. Allam A,
    7. Al-Rajhi N,
    8. Al-Amro A,
    9. Rostom AY,
    10. Abuzeid M,
    11. Otieschan A,
    12. Flores AD
    : Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: an analysis of prognostic factors. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(3): 193-199, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hinerman RW,
    2. Mendenhall WM,
    3. Morris CG,
    4. Amdur RJ,
    5. Werning JW,
    6. Villaret DB
    : Postoperative irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: 35-year experience. Head Neck 26(11): 984-994, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Lin CY,
    2. Lee LY,
    3. Huang SF,
    4. Kang CJ,
    5. Fan KH,
    6. Wang HM,
    7. Chen EY,
    8. Chen IH,
    9. Liao CT,
    10. Cheng AJ,
    11. Chang JT
    : Treatment outcome of combined modalities for buccal cancers: unilateral or bilateral neck radiation? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(5): 1373-1381, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Fan KH,
    2. Lin CY,
    3. Kang CJ,
    4. Huang SF,
    5. Wang HM,
    6. Chen EY,
    7. Chen IH,
    8. Liao CT,
    9. Cheng AJ,
    10. Chang JT
    : Combined-modality treatment for advanced oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(2): 453-461, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Fan KH,
    2. Lin CY,
    3. Kang CJ,
    4. Lee LY,
    5. Huang SF,
    6. Liao CT,
    7. Chen IH,
    8. Ng SH,
    9. Wang HM,
    10. Chang JT
    : Postoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy improved treatment outcomes of patients with oral cavity cancer with multiple-node metastases but no other major risk factors. PLoS One 9(2): e86922, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kang CJ,
    2. Lin CY,
    3. Wang HM,
    4. Fan KH,
    5. Ng SH,
    6. Lee LY,
    7. Chen IH,
    8. Huang SF,
    9. Liao CT,
    10. Yen TC
    : The number of pathologically positive lymph nodes and pathological tumor depth predicts prognosis in patients with poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(4): e223-230, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Liao CT,
    2. Lee LY,
    3. Hsueh C,
    4. Lin CY,
    5. Fan KH,
    6. Wang HM,
    7. Ng SH,
    8. Lin CH,
    9. Tsao CK,
    10. Chen IH,
    11. Chang KP,
    12. Huang SF,
    13. Kang CJ,
    14. Fang KH,
    15. Wang YC,
    16. Chang YL,
    17. Huang YC,
    18. Tsai CY,
    19. Yen TC
    : Comparative outcomes in oral cavity cancer with resected pT4a and pT4b. Oral Oncol 49(3): 230-236, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Wreesmann VB,
    2. Katabi N,
    3. Palmer FL,
    4. Montero PH,
    5. Migliacci JC,
    6. Gonen M,
    7. Carlson D,
    8. Ganly I,
    9. Shah JP,
    10. Ghossein R,
    11. Patel SG
    : Influence of extracapsular nodal spread extent on prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck, 2015.
  35. ↵
    1. Hynes NE,
    2. Lane HA
    : ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 5(5): 341-354, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rogers SJ,
    2. Harrington KJ,
    3. Rhys-Evans P,
    4. P OC,
    5. Eccles SA
    : Biological significance of c-erbB family oncogenes in head and neck cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 24(1): 47-69, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Kalyankrishna S,
    2. Grandis JR
    : Epidermal growth factor receptor biology in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(17): 2666-2672, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Chung CH,
    2. Parker JS,
    3. Karaca G,
    4. Wu J,
    5. Funkhouser WK,
    6. Moore D,
    7. Butterfoss D,
    8. Xiang D,
    9. Zanation A,
    10. Yin X,
    11. Shockley WW,
    12. Weissler MC,
    13. Dressler LG,
    14. Shores CG,
    15. Yarbrough WG,
    16. Perou CM
    : Molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using patterns of gene expression. Cancer Cell 5(5): 489-500, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Weinstein JN,
    2. Collisson EA,
    3. Mills GB,
    4. Shaw KR,
    5. Ozenberger BA,
    6. Ellrott K,
    7. Shmulevich I,
    8. Sander C,
    9. Stuart JM
    : The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat Genet 45(10): 1113-1120, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Ni YH,
    2. Ding L,
    3. Hu QG,
    4. Hua ZC
    : Potential biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma: proteomics discovery and clinical validation. Proteomics Clin Appl 9(1-2): 86-97, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. JC DEV,
    2. Fernandez-Valle A,
    3. Vivanco-Allende B,
    4. Santamarta TR,
    5. Lequerica-Fernandez P,
    6. Hernandez-Vallejo G,
    7. Allonca-Campa E
    : The prognostic role of claudins -1 and -4 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 35(5): 2949-2959, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (2)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 2
February 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk Factors Associated with Disease Recurrence in Patients with Stage III/IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity Treated with Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Risk Factors Associated with Disease Recurrence in Patients with Stage III/IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity Treated with Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy
ANISHA R. NOBLE, JOHN F. GRESKOVICH, JAEHONG HAN, CHANDANA A. REDDY, TOBENNA I. NWIZU, MUMTAZ F. KHAN, JOSEPH SCHARPF, DAVID J. ADELSTEIN, BRIAN B. BURKEY, SHLOMO A. KOYFMAN
Anticancer Research Feb 2016, 36 (2) 785-792;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Risk Factors Associated with Disease Recurrence in Patients with Stage III/IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity Treated with Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy
ANISHA R. NOBLE, JOHN F. GRESKOVICH, JAEHONG HAN, CHANDANA A. REDDY, TOBENNA I. NWIZU, MUMTAZ F. KHAN, JOSEPH SCHARPF, DAVID J. ADELSTEIN, BRIAN B. BURKEY, SHLOMO A. KOYFMAN
Anticancer Research Feb 2016, 36 (2) 785-792;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Outcome of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer and pN0 Neck
  • A Total Radiation Dose of 70 Gy Is Required After Macroscopically Incomplete Resection of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Importance of Chemotherapy and Radiation Dose After Microscopically Incomplete Resection of Stage III/IV Head and Neck Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation Under Local Anesthesia: A Single Center Experience in Taiwan
  • Conversion Surgery for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated With FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel
  • Gastric Linitis Plastica: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes from the National Cancer Database
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • chemoradiotherapy
  • disease-free survival
  • head and neck neoplasms
  • risk factors
  • neoplasm recurrence
  • survival rate
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire