Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Long-term High-quality Survival with Single-agent Mifepristone Treatment Despite Advanced Cancer

JEROME H. CHECK, DIANE CHECK, CARRIE WILSON and PATRICE LOFBERG
Anticancer Research December 2016, 36 (12) 6511-6513;
JEROME H. CHECK
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, U.S.A.
2Cooper Institute for Reproductive Hormonal Disorders, P.C., Mt. Laurel, NJ, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: laurie@ccivf.com
DIANE CHECK
2Cooper Institute for Reproductive Hormonal Disorders, P.C., Mt. Laurel, NJ, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CARRIE WILSON
2Cooper Institute for Reproductive Hormonal Disorders, P.C., Mt. Laurel, NJ, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PATRICE LOFBERG
2Cooper Institute for Reproductive Hormonal Disorders, P.C., Mt. Laurel, NJ, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Case Report: We show long-term high-quality survival following single-agent treatment with a progesterone receptor antagonist in two cases of advanced metastatic cancer. Because no biopsy was performed (patient refused) the exact type of lung cancer was not determined but the majority of oncologists who evaluated the patient thought that the rapid onset and syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone was more consistent with small-cell lung cancer. The US Food and Drug Association granted a compassionate-use investigational new drug approval for use of single-agent 200 mg mifepristone orally/day to a moribund woman with never-treated metastatic lung cancer and a male with bilateral renal cell carcinoma who had undergone only a unilateral hemi-nephrectomy. Both had long-term high-quality survival (5 years for the patient with lung cancer with complete remission of all lung lesions, and 12 years for the male patient with kidney cancer). Neither patient had any side-effects from mifepristone therapy. Conclusion: These cases helped influence the US Food and Drug Association in granting an investigator-initiated investigational new drug study on advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • lung cancer
  • advanced metastatic cancer
  • progesterone receptor antagonist
  • mifepristone
  • compassionate use
  • case report

A hypothetical model for potential tumor immunotherapy based on the knowledge of immune mechanism responsible for the fetal semi-allograft escaping immune surveillance was published in 2001 (1). Logically, it makes sense that malignant tumors may ‘borrow’ mechanisms already in existence in normal pregnancy to similarly prevent immune rejection (1).

Immune fetal tolerance requires a balance between regulatory T-cells, effector T-cells and co-stimulatory pathways (2). The programmed cell death (PD)-1–PD1 ligand (PD1L) negative co-stimulatory pathway has been found to be essential for inducing and maintaining fetomaternal tolerance (3). This has led to the development of biological agents using antibodies targeting PD1 (also known as B7 homolog-1 or B7H1) and PD1L as immunotherapy for cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma (4).

Another critical protein used by the fetal semi-allograft is known as the progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) (5). The full-length protein consists of 757 amino acid residues. The protein seems to be unique in that it has no significant amino acid sequence homology with any known protein (6).

The parent compound, measuring 90 kDa, resides in the nucleus at a centrosomal position. A 34 kDa form is found in the serum and is believed to be caused by the interaction of progesterone with its receptors (PR) on γ/δ T-cells without the need for an allogeneic stimulus (7). An intracytoplasmic splice variant of the parent compound seems to be of similar size to the serum protein (8).

Adding progesterone to the media of human leukemia cell lines up-regulates intracytoplasmic PIBF expression, whereas adding the PR antagonist (or modulator is probably a more accurate term) mifepristone down-regulates intracytoplasmic PIBF expression (9). PIBF seems to be present in the cytoplasm of all rapidly growing cells, which would include fetal cells and cancer cells but not normally dividing cells (8). Thus, the PIBF protein seems to be a logical target to suppress in order to allow the normal body to immunologically destroy cancer cells (10).

In contrast to suppressing the PD1–PD1L negative co-stimulatory pathway to suppress tumor growth, which is also needed to suppress immune attack of normal cells (and thus anti-PD1 and -PD1L therapy are associated with a high frequency of autoimmune complications, e.g., severe Crohn's disease), theoretically, suppressing PIBF should be associated with few side-effects because it is not needed in cells growing at a normal speed. Reported below are two cases that had marked extension of expected life-span, marked improved quality of life, and no side-effects while being treated with mifepristone monotherapy.

Case Report

Case 1. An 80-year-old woman was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for respiratory failure. Chest x-ray revealed many lung lesions most consistent with lung cancer with multiple lung metastases. She was subsequently admitted several more times with very low arterial pO2 levels and her serum sodium progressively decreased to 118 mmol/l. The radiological and clinical diagnosis was probable advanced lung cancer with the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) from ectopic tumor production of arginine vasopressin. The patient refused surgery or chemotherapy but did agree to experimental use of oral mifepristone at 200 mg daily. Her pO2 returned to 99-100 mmHg within 1 month and her serum sodium level returned to normal. Six weeks later, all her lung lesions had gone by computed tomographic scan. The patient's PO2 remains 96-98 mmHg, she is feeling fine, and her most recent computed tomographic scan continued to show no tumors 5 years after initial treatment. Her treatment had been approved by the US Food and Drug Association (FDA) on a compassionate basis.

Case 2. A 58-year-old male with bilateral renal cell carcinoma with metastasis to local lymph nodes received FDA approval to use 200 mg daily mifepristone on a compassionate basis because at that time there was no chemotherapy that was known to be effective. The patient refused bilateral nephrectomy, agreeing to only laparoscopic right hemi-nephrectomy in order to remove the largest lesion, leaving the left kidney intact. The left kidney lesions did not recede, but remained stable for 10 years, and no new lesions appeared on bi-annual computed tomographic scans. After 10 years of therapy, diabetes caused this patient to go into renal failure. He then underwent a bilateral nephrectomy and subsequently a kidney transplant. The patient is still fine after 12 years from diagnosis.

Neither patient has reported any side-effects from long-term use of mifepristone at 200 mg daily. The male with renal cell carcinoma is still taking 200 mg/day mifepristone. The female with lung cancer recently died of an acute myocardial infarction at the age of 85 years and she was lung cancer-free up to the time of death and continued her daily dosage of 200 mg/day mifepristone.

Discussion

These two cases demonstrate significant long-term survival, and improved quality of life, and in one of these, a prolonged disease-free interval with single-agent mifepristone therapy. These two patients received no other chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy. The patient with lung cancer did not even have any surgical treatment, and the patient with renal cell carcinoma underwent incomplete surgery.

These are not unique cases in that mifepristone immunotherapy has been given to other patients with advanced cancer with permission from the FDA on a compassionate basis because no other therapies were available. Significant palliation was observed in a variety of other types of cancer (11-13).

On the basis of the aforementioned patients with lung cancer in this present report, and similar improvement in a controlled study of mice with spontaneous lung cancer, the FDA has granted an investigator-initiated investigational new drug approval for studying the use of single-agent mifepristone for patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer having failed to stop progression despite two rounds of chemotherapy/immunotherapy (14,15). Of course with the presence of SIADH, our patient with lung cancer could have had small cell lung cancer.

Due to the fact that mifepristone in dosages well above the dosage needed to cause abortion of a fetus failed to lower serum PIBF levels, Check et al. hypothesized that the benefit of the progesterone receptor modulator mifepristone for various cancers is related to suppressing the conversion of the 90 kDa parent nuclear-associated protein to the 34-36 kDa intracytoplasmic splice variant of PIBF (16,17). Nevertheless, the PR may be involved in other ways to allow cancer cells to escape immune surveillance (17).

Although it is possible that PIBF could also help fetal and cancer cells escape immune surveillance by suppression of natural killer cells in the tumor microenvironment, the suppression of intracytoplasmic PIBF by mifepristone, but not circulating PIBF, seems to detract from this hypothesis (9, 17, 18). Serum levels of PIBF are not elevated in gynecological or breast cancer even if PR-positive (19, 20).

To date, the data are limited by small numbers restricted to anecdotal cases. Mifepristone seems to be very well tolerated in 200-300 mg dosages. As far as we are aware, there has not been one individual treated with this drug for cancer who has not shown some benefit (11-13). In some cases the drug may induce complete remission, as in the aforementioned patient with lung cancer, and in some instances inhibit more tumors from forming and thwart growth of pre-existing lesions without complete regression, as in the case of renal cell carcinoma described.

Hopefully these reports will stimulate interest in other researchers to corroborate or refute this initial positive anecdotal experience. If corroborated, hopefully, interest could be generated in performing large prospective clinical trials for a variety of treatment-resistant cancer types.

  • Received October 14, 2016.
  • Revision received November 7, 2016.
  • Accepted November 8, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Nazari P,
    3. Goldberg J,
    4. Yuen W,
    5. Angotti D
    : A model for potential tumor immunotherapy based on knowledge of immune mechanisms responsible for spontaneous abortion. Med Hypoth 57: 337-343, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Billiard F,
    2. Litvinova E,
    3. Saadoun D,
    4. Djelti F,
    5. Klatzmann D,
    6. Cohen JL,
    7. Marodon G,
    8. Salomon BL
    : Regulatory and effector T-cell activation levels are prime determinants of in vivo immune regulation. J Immunol 177: 2167-2174, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Keir ME,
    2. Butte MJ,
    3. Freeman GJ,
    4. Sharpe AH
    : PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Ann Rev Immunol 26: 677-704, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Yao S,
    2. Zhu Y,
    3. Chen L
    : Advances in targeting cell surface signaling molecules for immune modulation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12: 130-146, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Szekeres Bartho J,
    3. O'Shaughnessy A
    : Progesterone-induced blocking factor seen in pregnancy lymphocytes soon after implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol 35: 277 280, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Polgar B,
    2. Kispal GY,
    3. Lachmann M,
    4. Paar C,
    5. Nagy E,
    6. Csere P,
    7. Miko E,
    8. Szereday L,
    9. Varga P,
    10. Szekeres-Bartho J
    : Molecular cloning and immunological characterization of a novel cDNA coding for PIBF. J Immunol 171: 5956-5963, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Cohen R,
    2. Check JH,
    3. Dougherty M
    : Evidence that exposure to progesterone alone is a sufficient stimulus to cause a precipitous rise in the immunomodulatory protein the progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF). J Assist Reprod Genet 33: 221-229, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Lachmann M,
    2. Gelbmann D,
    3. Kalman E,
    4. Polgar B,
    5. Buschle M,
    6. von Gabain A,
    7. Szekeres-Bartho J,
    8. Nagy E
    : PIBF (progesterone-induced blocking factor) is overexpressed in highly proliferating cells and associated with the centrosome. Int J Cancer 112: 51-60, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Srivastava MD,
    2. Thomas A,
    3. Srivastava BI,
    4. Check JH
    : Expression and modulation of progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) and innate immune factors in human leukemia cell lines by progesterone and mifepristone. Leuk Lymphoma 48: 1610-1617, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Dix E,
    3. Sansoucie L
    : Support for the hypothesis that successful immunotherapy of various cancers can be achieved by inhibiting a progesterone-associated immunomodulatory protein. Med Hypoth 72: 87-90, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Dix E,
    3. Sansoucie L,
    4. Check D
    : Mifepristone may halt progression of extensively metastatic human adenocarcinoma of the colon – case report. Anticancer Res 29: 1611-1613, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Check JH,
    2. Dix E,
    3. Cohen R,
    4. Check D,
    5. Wilson C
    : Efficacy of the progesterone receptor antagonist mifepristone for palliative therapy of patients with a variety of advanced cancer types. Anticancer Res 30: 623-628, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Wilson C,
    3. Cohen R,
    4. Sarumi M
    : Evidence that mifepristone, a progesterone receptor antagonist can cross the blood–brain barrier and provide palliative benefits for glioblastoma multiforme grade IV. Anticancer Res 34: 2385-2388, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Sansoucie L,
    3. Chern J,
    4. Dix E
    : Mifepristone treatment improves length and quality of survival of mice with spontaneous lung cancer. Anticancer Res 30: 119-122, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Check JH
    : Study of Oral Mifepristone as Salvage Therapy in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02642939?term=mifepristone+and+melrose+park&rank=1
  15. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. DiAntonio G,
    3. DiAntonio A,
    4. Duroseau M
    : The progesterone (P) receptor antagonist mifepristone does not lower serum progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF) in the presence of P. Clin Exp Obst Gyn 43: 189-191, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Cohen R
    : The role of progesterone and the progesterone receptor in human reproduction and cancer. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 8: 469-484, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. SanSoucie L,
    3. Chern J,
    4. Amadi N,
    5. Srivastava M,
    6. Larece K
    : Evidence that progesterone receptor antagonists may help in the treatment of a variety of cancers by locally suppressing natural killer cell activity. Clin Exp Obst Gynecol 34: 207-211, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Sarumi M,
    3. Diantonio A,
    4. Hunter K,
    5. Simpkins G,
    6. Duroseau M
    : Serum levels of the progesterone-induced blocking factor do not precipitously rise in women with gynecologic cancer in contrast to women exposed to progesterone. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 42: 563-567, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Check JH,
    2. Rosenberg A,
    3. DiAntonio A,
    4. Rui H,
    5. Cohen R,
    6. DiAntonio G
    : Serum levels of the immunomodulatory protein, the progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF) are not higher in women with progesterone (P) receptor (R)-positive vs. negative breast cancer. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 April 18-22, Philadelphia, PA: AACR; 2015. Abstract nr 1281.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (12)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 12
December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Long-term High-quality Survival with Single-agent Mifepristone Treatment Despite Advanced Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Long-term High-quality Survival with Single-agent Mifepristone Treatment Despite Advanced Cancer
JEROME H. CHECK, DIANE CHECK, CARRIE WILSON, PATRICE LOFBERG
Anticancer Research Dec 2016, 36 (12) 6511-6513;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Long-term High-quality Survival with Single-agent Mifepristone Treatment Despite Advanced Cancer
JEROME H. CHECK, DIANE CHECK, CARRIE WILSON, PATRICE LOFBERG
Anticancer Research Dec 2016, 36 (12) 6511-6513;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Palliative Benefits of Oral Mifepristone for the Treatment of Metastatic Fibroblastic Osteosarcoma
  • Treatment With Mifepristone Allows a Patient With End-stage Pancreatic Cancer in Hospice on a Morphine Drip to Restore a Decent Quality of Life
  • Therapy Aimed to Suppress the Production of the Immunosuppressive Protein Progesterone Induced Blocking Factor (PIBF) May Provide Palliation and/or Increased Longevity for Patients With a Variety of Different Advanced Cancers - A Review
  • Mifepristone Extends Both Length and Quality of Life in a Patient With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer that Has Progressed Despite Chemotherapy and a Check-point Inhibitor
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib After Progression on First-line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
  • Efficacy and Safety of Platinum-based Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab Followed by Bevacizumab Maintenance for Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer During PARP Inhibitor Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Real-world Data of Palliative First-line Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Lung cancer
  • advanced metastatic cancer
  • progesterone receptor antagonist
  • mifepristone
  • compassionate use
  • case report
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire