Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Dynamin 2 Inhibitors as Novel Therapeutic Agents Against Cervical Cancer Cells

YOO-YOUNG LEE, HYE-KYUNG JEON, JUNGEUN LEE, JI EUN HONG, IN-GU DO, CHEL HUN CHOI, TAE-JOONG KIM, BYOUNG-GIE KIM, DUK-SOO BAE, YONG-CHUL KIM and JEONG-WON LEE
Anticancer Research December 2016, 36 (12) 6381-6388;
YOO-YOUNG LEE
1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HYE-KYUNG JEON
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUNGEUN LEE
3School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JI EUN HONG
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
IN-GU DO
4Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHEL HUN CHOI
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAE-JOONG KIM
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BYOUNG-GIE KIM
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DUK-SOO BAE
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YONG-CHUL KIM
3School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JEONG-WON LEE
4Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: garden.lee{at}samsung.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: We investigated the feasibility of dynamin 2 as a potential treatment target in cervical cancer cells. Materials and Methods: We performed tissue microarray for dynamin 2 expression in 208 patients with early cervical cancer and in vitro in HeLa cells with dynamin 2 inhibitors MiTMAB, OcTMAB, Dynasore, and DD-6. Results: Tumor size greater than 2 cm or tumor invasion of more than half of the entire cervix was associated with expression of dynamin 2 compared to no expression (p=0.013, and p=0.045, respectively). All dynamin 2 inhibitors significantly reduced proliferation, increased apoptotic activity, and reduced matrix metallopeptidase 9 expression in HeLa cells. Dynasore and DD-6 reduced migration of HeLa cells on laminin 1-coated plates and DD-6 most strongly reduced migration performance on fibronectin-coated plates. Conclusion: Targeting dynamin 2 may be a promising new approach for the treatment of cervical cancer.

  • Cervical cancer
  • dynamin 2
  • MiTMAB
  • OcTMAB
  • Dynasore
  • DD-6

Cervical carcinoma is still prevalent on a global scale and advanced, metastatic, or recurrent disease is difficult to cure using standard treatment (1). Increasing efforts have been made to identify genomic and proteomic alterations associated with cervical cancer progression and previous studies showed that dynamin 2, a member of the large GTPase superfamily, was differentially expressed between normal cervical epithelium, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm, and invasive cervical cancer tissues and had a prognostic role for predicting recurrence (2-4).

In vitro studies of various types of cancer cells have shown that dynamin 2 is required for extracellular matrix degradation by invasive cancer cells (5) and is also necessary for the endocytosis of several proteins associated with cancer motility and invasiveness (6). Furthermore, it was reported that dynamin 2 plays an important role in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis (7). This evidence strongly suggests that dynamin 2 is widely involved in tumor progression and metastasis and might be a good candidate target for new treatments that have not been extensively studied in cervical cancer cells.

In this study, we investigated the feasibility of dynamin 2 as a potential treatment target in cervical cancer cells using different dynamin 2 inhibitors.

Materials and Methods

Patients. With Institutional Review Board approval (2009-09-002-002), we searched electronic medical records of patients with primary early cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, FIGO stage I-II) who were treated with surgery and registered at the Samsung Medical Center of Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine in Seoul, Korea, between January 2002 and September 2008. A total of 208 patients were selected as candidates for tissue microarray (TMA).

TMA construction and immunohistochemical staining. TMAs were constructed using Beecher Manual Tissue Microarrayer (MTA-1; Beecher Instruments Inc., WI, USA). Four representative tumor regions were taken from donor formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks using a 0.6-mm core punch and arrayed into recipient blocks.

Immunohistochemical studies were carried out on 4-μm TMA sections with primary mouse monoclonal antibody specific for dynamin 2 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Tissue sections were deparaffinized three times in xylene for a total of 15 min and subsequently rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was carried out at 97°C, using PTLink (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) for 20 min in citrate buffer. After blocking endogenous peroxidase activity with 3% hydrogen peroxidase for 10 min, primary antibody incubation was carried out at a 1:200 dilution for 60 min at room temperature. The antigen–antibody reaction was detected using the DAKO REAL™ Envision™ Detection system, Peroxidase/DAB K5007 (DAKO). Counterstaining was performed with Mayer's hematoxylin. Negative controls (substitution of primary antibody for Tris-buffered saline) were run simultaneously. The slides were assessed by a pathologist (Dr. I-G Do) without knowledge of the clinical outcome.

Interpretation of TMA. Staining for dynamin 2 was considered to be positive when tumor cells showed membranous/cytoplasmic reactivity. Immunohistochemical staining was evaluated by a semiquantitative scoring system with two categories: intensity and percentage of positively stained cells. The intensity was graded on a semiquantitative scale from 0 to 3, where 0=no staining, 1=weak staining, 2=moderate staining, and 3=strong staining. The percentage of positive cells was stratified from 0 to 3, where no staining in all four TMA cores=0, positivity in 1 out of 4 cores=1, positivity in 2 out of 4 cores=2, and positivity in more than 2 cores=3. The two grades were multiplied and the immunohistochemical staining score was determined: 0 as negative, 1 and 2 as weak (score 1), 3 and 4 as moderate (score 2), and 6 and 9 as strongly positive (score 3).

Cell lines. Human cervical cancer cell lines HeLa, SiHa, and Ca Ski were obtained from the Korean Cell Line Bank (KCMB, Seoul, South Korea); C-33A was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (HeLa), minimal essential medium (SiHa, C-33A, MS751), McCoy's 5A (HT-3, ME180), or RPMI-1640 (Ca Ski) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 0.1% gentamicin sulfate (Gemini Bioproducts, Calabasas, CA, USA) in 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Reagents. Cell permeable dynamin inhibitors, 3-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxylic acid (3, 4-dihydroxybenzylidene) hydrazide (Dynasore), tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (MiTMAB) and octadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (OcTMAB) were purchased from Abcam Biochemicals (Cambridge, UK). DD-6 was obtained from Dr. Yong-Chul Kim (School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South Korea) and Dr. Sunghoe Chang (Department of Physiology and Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) (8). Dynasore, OcTMAB, and DD-6 were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). MiTMAB was dissolved in distilled water.

Small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection. Dynamin 2 siRNA and negative control siRNA were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Incorporated (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Cells were seeded at 3×103 cells/well in a 96-well microplate and at 2×105 cells/well in 6-well plates in DMEM with 10% FBS. All siRNAs were transfected into the cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. At 48 h after transfection with dynamin 2 siRNA, the relative percentage of apoptotic cells was assessed using the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit-1 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, cells were washed twice in PBS and the pellet was resuspended in annexin V binding buffer at a density of 106 cells/ml. Annexin V fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI) were added (1 μl of each per 105 cells). Samples were gently mixed and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark before FACS analysis.

3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. For the proliferation assay, HeLa cells were seeded at 3×103 cells/well in 96-well microplates, treated with different concentrations of dynamin inhibitors, and incubated at 37°C for 24, 48, and 72 h. MTT solution (Amresco, Solon, OH, USA) was then added to the 96-well microplates. After incubation for 4 h, the medium was discarded, 100 μl of acidic isopropanol (0.1 N HCl in absolute isopropanol) was added, and the plate was shaken gently. Absorbance was measured on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader at a test wavelength of 540 nm. Each sample was assayed in triplicate.

Western blot analysis. HeLa, SiHa, Ca Ski, and C-33A cells were lysed in PRO-PREP Protein Extraction Solution (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea). Protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo, IL, USA). Protein bands were probed with antibodies against dynamin 2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Epitomics, Burlingame, USA), or tubulin (Epitomics), and then labeled with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using an ECL kit (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For analysis of matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) and active caspase-3 expression, cells were lysed in PRO-PREP Protein Extraction Solution (Intron Biotechnology) after 24-h treatment with dynamin inhibitors. The protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo). ELISA kits were used to measure concentrations of human MMP9 (Abnova, Walnut, CA, USA) and active caspase-3 (Invitrogen) as described by the manufacturer. The samples were measured in triplicate.

Migration assay. HeLa cells were seeded at 1×105 cells/well in a 24-well plate and migration was measured using the Radius Cell Migration Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The plates were precoated with various extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins (laminin I, fibronectin, collagen I) to monitor the migratory properties of cells. After 17-h treatment with 10 μM dynamin inhibitors, cells were observed under a light microscope at ×40 magnification.

Statistical analysis. The Wilcoxon rank sum test or two-sample t-test was used to compare the median or mean values, respectively, after checking whether the data had non-normal or normal distributions according to the Shapiro-Wilks test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 18.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant and all reported p-values are two-sided.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Dynamin 2 expression in human cervical cancer as shown by immunohistochemical staining. Immunohistochemical staining was evaluated by a semi-quantitative scoring system with two categories: intensity and percentage of positively stained cells. The two scores were multiplied and the immunohistochemical staining score was determined: 0 as negative; 1 and 2 as weak (score 1); 3 and 4 as moderate (score 2); and 6 and 9 as strongly positive (score 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Dynamin 2 expression according to clinicopathological factors in cervical cancer tissue.

Results

We enrolled 208 patients with cervical cancer (FIGO stage IB1 to IIB) to investigate the expression of dynamin 2 in cervical cancer tissue and compared their expression levels according to the pathological findings after surgery. Different expression levels of dynamin 2 were observed in the cervical cancer samples, as shown in Figure 1. Tumor size greater than 2 cm or tumor invasion of more than half of the entire cervix was associated with positive expression of dynamin 2 compared to no expression (scores of 1, 2, and 3 vs. 0, p=0.013 and p=0.045, respectively, Table I).

Cervical cancer cell lines also exhibited different expression levels of dynamin 2, and the strong expression of dynamin 2 in HeLa cells was markedly reduced by transfection with specific siRNA as shown in Figure 2A. Dynamin 2-specific siRNA reduced cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2B and C). Based on these findings, further experiments with dynamin 2 inhibitors were performed in HeLa cells.

Different dynamin 2 inhibitors, MiTMAB, OcTMAB, Dynasore and DD-6, were used to inhibit dynamin 2 activity in HeLa cells and all of these inhibitors significantly reduced cell proliferation as assessed by MTT assay (Figure 3A). Specifically, inhibition of proliferation was dose-dependent with MiTMAB and Dynasore at 48 and 72 h. All of the inhibitors also markedly increased apoptotic activity in HeLa cells (Figure 3B).

Finally, we investigated the effect of dynamin 2 inhibitors on MMP9 expression and cell migration in HeLa cells, as shown in Figure 4. Different effects were observed for different inhibitors. For example, the expression of MMP9 was significantly reduced by treatment with OcTMAB, Dynasore, and DD-6. In the migration assay, Dynasore and DD-6 reduced cell migration and DD-6 most strongly reduced migration in fibronectin-coated wells.

Discussion

Dynamin 2, the most ubiquitous isoform of the dynamin family, has broad physiological functions in the regulation of vesicle transport and endocytosis trafficking (9, 10). Human papilloma virus (HPV) can enter the cytoplasm of cervical epithelium cells via dynamin 2-dependent endocytosis (11, 12), and this may eventually lead to progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasm and invasive cervical cancer. Interestingly, dynamin 2 was expressed at different levels with disease progression in our previous studies (2, 3).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Effects of dynamin 2-specific siRNA on cell survival and apoptosis in HeLa cells. Dynamin 2 was highly expressed in HeLa cells and its expression was reduced by dynamin 2-specific siRNA (A). Cell proliferation (B) was markedly reduced and apoptosis (C) was significantly increased by transfection with dynamin 2-specific siRNA. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001.

Our current results showed that inhibition of dynamin 2 resulted in a significant increase in apoptosis and decrease in cell proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells. Similar findings were also reported in various cancer cells derived from colon, breast, lung, pancreas, brain, and prostate (13-15). Most of these studies reported that dynamin 2 inhibition is not only associated with prevention of rapid turnover of focal adhesion molecules, which are required for cell migration, but is also associated with the arrest of cell kinesis, resulting in decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. For example, knockdown of dynamin 2 blocks beta 1 integrin internalization, leading to impaired focal adhesion disassembly and cell migration (6), and silencing of dynamin 2 induces cell death specifically following cytokinesis failure via the intrinsic apoptotic pathway involving cleavage of caspase-8, -9, and -3 (14). Furthermore, higher expression of dynamin 2 in human cancer tissue was associated with higher cancer-specific mortality (13). The results of our study suggest that dynamin 2 expression in cervical cancer tissue was associated with larger tumor size and increased local invasion. However, we did not find any prognostic difference in patients with cervical cancer based on the expression level of dynamin 2. This should be clarified in future studies but considering that most of our patients had early-stage cervical cancer, which usually has good survival outcomes, our study may have had insufficient power to detect a survival difference.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Effect of dynamin 2 inhibitors on proliferation and apoptosis of HeLa cells. Cell proliferation (A) was significantly reduced and apoptosis (B) was significantly increased by treatment with different inhibitors of dynamin 2 (MiTMAB, OcTMAB, Dynasore, DD-6). *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Effect of dynamin 2 inhibitors on matrix metallopeptidase (MMP) 9 expression (A) and migration (B) of HeLa cells. Expression of MMP9 was significantly reduced by different dynamin 2 inhibitors. Dynasore and DD-6 reduced the migration performance of HeLa cells on plates coated with laminin I, fibronectin, or collagen I. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001.

Studies of various dynamin 2 inhibitors, including Dynasore (16), long chain amines and ammonium salts (MiTMABs, OcTMAB) (14), and dynoles (15), revealed that they block the abscission phase of cytokinesis causing cell death. Here, we test our novel dynamin 2 inhibitor (DD-6), which was reported to more potently inhibit transferrin uptake and dynamin GTPase activity than dynasore (8). Targeting cytokinesis with DD-6 may be a promising new approach for the treatment of cancer.

Another implication of dynamin 2 inhibitors for tumor control is their anti-angiogenesis role through reducing the expression of angiogenic receptors in endothelial cells (17, 18). However, the molecular mechanisms by which dynamin 2 contributes to cancer progression are not fully understood. A recent study reported that there are multiple hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-binding sites in the promoter domain of dynamin 2 and, interestingly, reciprocal regulation of dynanim 2 and HIF in ovarian cancer cells (19). The authors found that miR-199a encoded by the opposite strand of dynamin 2 reduced HIF expression, cell migration, and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells, which are opposing results from those of previous studies mentioned above. It is not clear which factors are associated with these discrepant results and different tumor biology of each cell type might partially explain this phenomenon (20).

In conclusion, targeting dynamin 2 with various specific inhibitors may be a promising new approach for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI14C3418).

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors equally contributed to this study.

  • Received September 20, 2016.
  • Revision received October 5, 2016.
  • Accepted October 10, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hirte H,
    2. Kennedy EB,
    3. Elit L,
    4. Fung Kee,
    5. Fung M
    : Systemic therapy for recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer: A clinical practice guideline. Curr Oncol 22(3): 211-219, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lee YY,
    2. Song SY,
    3. Do IG,
    4. Kim TJ,
    5. Kim BG,
    6. Lee JW,
    7. Bae DS
    : Dynamin 2 expression as a biomarker in grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 164(2): 180-184, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lee YY,
    2. Do IG,
    3. Park YA,
    4. Choi JJ,
    5. Song SY,
    6. Kim CJ,
    7. Kim MK,
    8. Song TJ,
    9. Park HS,
    10. Choi CH,
    11. Kim TJ,
    12. Kim BG,
    13. Lee JW,
    14. Bae DS
    : Low dynamin 2 expression is associated with tumor invasion and metastasis in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of cervix. Cancer Biol Ther 10(4): 329-335, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lee YY,
    2. Kim TJ,
    3. Kim JY,
    4. Choi CH,
    5. Do IG,
    6. Song SY,
    7. Sohn I,
    8. Jung SH,
    9. Bae DS,
    10. Lee JW,
    11. Kim BG
    : Genetic profiling to predict recurrence of early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 131(3): 650-654, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Baldassarre M,
    2. Pompeo A,
    3. Beznoussenko G,
    4. Castaldi C,
    5. Cortellino S,
    6. McNiven MA,
    7. Luini A,
    8. Buccione R
    : Dynamin participates in focal extracellular matrix degradation by invasive cells. Mol Biol Cell 14(3): 1074-1084, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Chao WT,
    2. Kunz J
    : Focal adhesion disassembly requires clathrin-dependent endocytosis of integrins. FEBS Lett 583(8): 1337-1343, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bhattacharya R,
    2. Kang-Decker N,
    3. Hughes DA,
    4. Mukherjee P,
    5. Shah V,
    6. McNiven MA,
    7. Mukhopadhyay D
    : Regulatory role of dynamin-2 in vegfr-2/kdr-mediated endothelial signaling. FASEB J 19(12): 1692-1694, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lee S,
    2. Jung KY,
    3. Park J,
    4. Cho JH,
    5. Kim YC,
    6. Chang S
    : Synthesis of potent chemical inhibitors of dynamin gtpase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20(16): 4858-4864, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Stowell MH,
    2. Marks B,
    3. Wigge P,
    4. McMahon HT
    : Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in dynamin: Evidence for a mechanochemical molecular spring. Nat Cell Biol 1(1): 27-32, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Praefcke GJ,
    2. McMahon HT
    : The dynamin superfamily: Universal membrane tubulation and fission molecules? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5(2): 133-147, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Schelhaas M,
    2. Shah B,
    3. Holzer M,
    4. Blattmann P,
    5. Kuhling L,
    6. Day PM,
    7. Schiller JT,
    8. Helenius A
    : Entry of human papillomavirus type 16 by actin-dependent, clathrin- and lipid raft-independent endocytosis. PLoS Pathog 8(4): e1002657, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Smith JL,
    2. Campos SK,
    3. Ozbun MA
    : Human papillomavirus type 31 uses a caveolin 1- and dynamin 2-mediated entry pathway for infection of human keratinocytes. J Virol 81(18): 9922-9931, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Xu B,
    2. Teng LH,
    3. Silva SD,
    4. Bijian K,
    5. Al Bashir S,
    6. Jie S,
    7. Dolph M,
    8. Alaoui-Jamali MA,
    9. Bismar TA
    : The significance of dynamin 2 expression for prostate cancer progression, prognostication, and therapeutic targeting. Cancer Med 3(1): 14-24, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Joshi S,
    2. Braithwaite AW,
    3. Robinson PJ,
    4. Chircop M
    : Dynamin inhibitors induce caspase-mediated apoptosis following cytokinesis failure in human cancer cells and this is blocked by bcl-2 overexpression. Mol Cancer 10: 78, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Chircop M,
    2. Perera S,
    3. Mariana A,
    4. Lau H,
    5. Ma MP,
    6. Gilbert J,
    7. Jones NC,
    8. Gordon CP,
    9. Young KA,
    10. Morokoff A,
    11. Sakoff J,
    12. O'Brien TJ,
    13. McCluskey A,
    14. Robinson PJ
    : Inhibition of dynamin by dynole 34-2 induces cell death following cytokinesis failure in cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 10(9): 1553-1562, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Thompson HM,
    2. McNiven MA
    : Discovery of a new ‘dynasore’. Nat Chem Biol 2(7): 355-356, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Gu C,
    2. Yaddanapudi S,
    3. Weins A,
    4. Osborn T,
    5. Reiser J,
    6. Pollak M,
    7. Hartwig J,
    8. Sever S
    : Direct dynamin-actin interactions regulate the actin cytoskeleton. EMBO J 29(21): 3593-3606, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Otsuka A,
    2. Abe T,
    3. Watanabe M,
    4. Yagisawa H,
    5. Takei K,
    6. Yamada H
    : Dynamin 2 is required for actin assembly in phagocytosis in sertoli cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 378(3): 478-482, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Joshi HP,
    2. Subramanian IV,
    3. Schnettler EK,
    4. Ghosh G,
    5. Rupaimoole R,
    6. Evans C,
    7. Saluja M,
    8. Jing Y,
    9. Cristina I,
    10. Roy S,
    11. Zeng Y,
    12. Shah VH,
    13. Sood AK,
    14. Ramakrishnan S
    : Dynamin 2 along with microrna-199a reciprocally regulate hypoxia-inducible factors and ovarian cancer metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(14): 5331-5336, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Natarajan A,
    2. Yardimci GG,
    3. Sheffield NC,
    4. Crawford GE,
    5. Ohler U
    : Predicting cell-type-specific gene expression from regions of open chromatin. Genome Res 22(9): 1711-1722, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 12
December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamin 2 Inhibitors as Novel Therapeutic Agents Against Cervical Cancer Cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Dynamin 2 Inhibitors as Novel Therapeutic Agents Against Cervical Cancer Cells
YOO-YOUNG LEE, HYE-KYUNG JEON, JUNGEUN LEE, JI EUN HONG, IN-GU DO, CHEL HUN CHOI, TAE-JOONG KIM, BYOUNG-GIE KIM, DUK-SOO BAE, YONG-CHUL KIM, JEONG-WON LEE
Anticancer Research Dec 2016, 36 (12) 6381-6388;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Dynamin 2 Inhibitors as Novel Therapeutic Agents Against Cervical Cancer Cells
YOO-YOUNG LEE, HYE-KYUNG JEON, JUNGEUN LEE, JI EUN HONG, IN-GU DO, CHEL HUN CHOI, TAE-JOONG KIM, BYOUNG-GIE KIM, DUK-SOO BAE, YONG-CHUL KIM, JEONG-WON LEE
Anticancer Research Dec 2016, 36 (12) 6381-6388;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Mindin mediated {alpha}M-Integrin endocytosis activates STAT3 to maintain keratinocyte stemness
  • Role of Dynamin 2 in mitochondrial fission and cell cycle regulation: Dysregulation of a miR-124-3p-STAT3-DNM2-Drp1-RGCC pathway connects fission and cell proliferation in pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • POM121 Drives Gastric Cancer Progression via the mTOR/p70S6K Signaling Axis
  • Glutamine Dependence Is Not a Cancer-specific Vulnerability in Contrast to Methionine Dependence
  • mTOR Modulation Affects Galectin-1 Expression in KMT2A-rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Cervical cancer
  • dynamin 2
  • MiTMAB
  • OcTMAB
  • Dynasore
  • DD-6
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire