Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Consequences of an Early PSA Response to Enzalutamide Treatment for Japanese Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

HARUO KATO, YOSUKE FURUYA, YOSHIYUKI MIYAZAWA, TAKESHI MIYAO, TAKAHIRO SYUTO, MASASHI NOMURA, YOSHITAKA SEKINE, HIDEKAZU KOIKE, HIROSHI MATSUI, YASUHIRO SHIBATA, KAZUTO ITO and KAZUHIRO SUZUKI
Anticancer Research November 2016, 36 (11) 6141-6149;
HARUO KATO
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSUKE FURUYA
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIYUKI MIYAZAWA
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKESHI MIYAO
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAHIRO SYUTO
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASASHI NOMURA
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHITAKA SEKINE
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEKAZU KOIKE
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI MATSUI
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUHIRO SHIBATA
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUTO ITO
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUHIRO SUZUKI
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kazu@gunma-u.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Recent studies have shown that an early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response to androgen receptor (AR)-targeting agents in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is associated with a better prognosis. We analyzed early PSA response to enzalutamide and oncological outcomes to study their prognostic significance in the Japanese population. Patients and Methods: Fifty-one patients with mCRPC (26 of pre-docetaxel and 25 of post-docetaxel status) were treated with enzalutamide. The PSA progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. The association of rPFS and OS in patients with an early PSA response at 4 weeks after commencement of enzalutamide was studied. Results: Early PSA responses were significantly associated with a longer rPFS (median of 47.9 vs. 20.1 weeks, p<0.001, in patients exhibiting a 50% PSA response; median of 40.9 vs. 20.1 weeks, p=0.016, in patients exhibiting a 30% PSA response). OS was also significantly associated with an early PSA response (p=0.002 for patients exhibiting a 50% PSA response, p=0.003 for patients exhibiting a 30% PSA response). Multivariate analysis showed that the predictors of a 50% PSA response were an interval to mCRPC and a docetaxel treatment history, while the predictor of a 30% PSA response was a docetaxel treatment history. Furthermore, a 50% PSA response was independently prognostic of rPFS. Conclusion: An early PSA response to enzalutamide was significantly associated with a longer rPFS and OS. This information will aid in the management of patients treated with enzalutamide.

  • Castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • enzalutamide
  • early PSA response
  • radiographic progression-free survival
  • overall survival

The treatment strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have changed dramatically in time since new androgen receptor (AR)-targeting agents and a new class of taxane agents have been approved in Japan (1). Enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate are AR-targeting agents with proven survival benefits in patients of both pre- and post-docetaxel status (2-5). Enzalutamide is a second-generation anti-androgen exerting multiple inhibitory functions on androgen signal transduction (6). The pivotal clinical trials PREVEIL and AFFIRM showed that use of these drugs was associated with significantly better overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) PFS, quality-of-life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate questionnaire (FACT-P) and skeletal-related events (2, 3, 7, 8). Useful clinical effects of enzalutamide have been reported in Japanese patients (9).

Generally, the responses to AR-targeting agents are categorized into three patterns: continuous sensitivity, resistance acquisition and primary resistance (10). The mechanisms underlying drug resistance are multifactorial and biomarkers of drug resistance against AR-targeting agents are very important in the selection of patients suitable for treatment with such agents (11). The AR-V7 mutant, which lacks the ligand-binding domain of AR, has attracted attention in terms of resistance to AR-targeting agents (12). AR-V7 expression by circulating tumor cells (CTCs) was significantly associated with resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate (13, 14). However, no commercial method of detecting AR-V7 in CTCs is yet available. The prognostic significance of an early PSA response was recently evaluated in patients treated with AR-targeting agents, including abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide (15-17). In the current study, we assessed PSA responses 4 weeks after initiation of enzalutamide in a Japanese population with mCRPC to determine whether such responses were associated with rPFS or OS.

Patients and Methods

Fifty-one patients with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide in Gunma University Hospital, Japan, from August 2014 through January 2015, were analyzed. The PSA levels, full blood counts and routine biochemical data were generally determined every 4 weeks, whereas radiographic analyses (computed tomography (CT)/bone scans) were generally performed every 3 to 5 months. Enzalutamide was basically discontinued after confirmation of radiographic progression, but not PSA progression, if no intolerable adverse events occurred. Docetaxel was administered with 70 mg/m2 dose every 4 weeks in combination with 10 mg prednisolone or 1 mg dexamethasone. PSA PFS and rPFS were calculated according to the definitions of the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) (18). OS was defined as the time to death or the last follow-up of surviving patients. Clinical data collected to the end of March 2016 were analyzed.

Patients' characteristics were compared using Student's t-test or the Chi-squared test. PSA PFS, rPFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and statistical significance was assessed with the aid of the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses estimating the effects of pretreatment factors on rPFS and OS were performed using Cox's proportional hazard models. Factors predicting an early PSA response were evaluated using logistic regression models. Laboratory data, including hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP), were categorized in variables. Cut-off levels were determined by the median values of the aforementioned factors. SPSS software version 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used in all analyses.

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Gunma University Hospital (No.1339).

Results

Patients' characteristics. Patients' characteristics are shown in Table I. The patients' ages ranged from 54 to 87 years (median=73). Most patients were of excellent performance status. All patients had radiographically confirmed metastases (bone only in 35.3%, bone + lymph node in 25.5%, lymph node only in 31.4% and viscera in 7.8%). The time to mCRPC ranged from 4 to 157 months with a median of 20 months. Twenty-six patients were docetaxel-naïve and 25 were of post-docetaxel status. We first administered enzalutamide at 160 mg/day with a dose reduction or interruption for patients who experienced intolerable adverse events. In the latter period of the study, we started with enzalutamide at 80 mg/day and generally increased the dose to 160 mg/day.

The post-docetaxel group was significantly younger, with their time to mCRPC being significantly shorter than that of patients in the pre-docetaxel group. In terms of the initial dose of enzalutamide, the rate of low-dose induction was significantly higher in the pre-docetaxel group. The PSA levels were significantly lower in the pre-docetaxel than post-docetaxel group. No significant difference was evident in the baseline hemoglobin, ALP, LDH or CRP levels.

PSA PFS, rPFS and OS. A waterfall plot of the best PSA response rate is shown in Figure 1. A 50% PSA response was observed in 52.9%, 69.2% and 36.0% of patients in the entire, pre- and post-docetaxel groups, respectively. The PSA response in the pre-docetaxel group was significantly better than that in the post-docetaxel group (p=0.024). The PSA PFS (according to the PCWG2) is shown in Table II. The median PSA PFS was 16, 24 and 12 weeks in the entire, pre- and post-docetaxel groups, respectively. The PSA PFS of the pre-docetaxel group was significantly longer than that of the post-docetaxel group (p=0.011). The median rPFS was 37.7, 51.6 and 29.4 weeks in the entire, pre- and post-docetaxel groups, respectively. The OS of the entire and pre-docetaxel groups did not attain the median, while the median OS of the post-docetaxel group was 63.7 weeks. The OS of the pre-docetaxel group was significantly longer than that of the post-docetaxel group (p=0.004).

Early PSA response. Four weeks after initiation of treatment, a 30% and 50% PSA response was observed in 60.8% and 45.1% of patients, respectively, as shown in Table III. The pre-docetaxel group responded significantly better than did the post-docetaxel group (p=0.023 for a 30% PSA response, p=0.025 for a 50% PSA response).

In all patients, 30% and 50% PSA responses at 4 weeks were significantly associated with a longer rPFS (median of 40.9 vs. 20.1 weeks, p=0.016, for those with a 30% PSA response; median of 47.9 vs. 20.1 weeks, p<0.001, for those with a 50% PSA response) (Table IV; Figure 2a, b). OS was also significantly associated with 30% and 50% PSA responses at 4 weeks, with p-values of 0.003 and 0.002, respectively (Table IV; Figure 3a, b).

In the pre-docetaxel group, a 50% PSA response was significantly associated with a longer rPFS (p=0.004), as shown in Table IV. In patients treated with docetaxel, a 30% PSA response at 4 weeks was significantly associated with a longer rPFS (p=0.042). A 50% PSA response at 4 weeks exhibited a strong tendency to be associated with a longer rPFS (p=0.066) and OS (p=0.096), as shown in Table IV.

Pretreatment factors predicting an early PSA response. Factors predictive of a 30% or 50% PSA response were estimated using logistic regression models. The tested variables were a history of docetaxel use; the enzalutamide dose; performance status; LDH, hemoglobin, ALP and CRP levels; and times to mCRPC of less than 12 or 16 months. A history of docetaxel use and a time to mCRPC of longer than 16 months significantly predicted a 50% PSA response. A history of docetaxel use was a significant predictor of the 30% PSA response (Table I).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patients' characteristics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Median PSA PFS, rPFS and OS.

Prognostic factors for rPFS and OS. For rPFS, univariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard models showed that early PSA30% response and 50% response were significantly associated with better rPFS. Multivariate analysis showed that early 50% PSA response was independently predictive of rPFS (Table VI).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

PSA responses at 4 weeks after treatment commencement.

For OS, univariate analysis showed that hemoglobin, ALP, CRP, time to CRPC with both 12 month and 16 month, a docetaxel treatment history, early PSA responses were significantly associated with better OS. Multivariate analysis showed that hemoglobin, ALP and a docetaxel treatment history were independently predictive of better OS (Table VII).

Discussion

The principal findings of the present study are the significant associations between the PSA responses 4 weeks after initiation of enzalutamide treatment and the improved oncological outcomes. Overall, both the 50% and 30% PSA responses strongly predicted both rPFS and OS. When patients were stratified by docetaxel treatment history, the 50% PSA response still significantly affected rPFS and OS in patients without a history of docetaxel use. In patients of post-docetaxel status, such tendencies were consistently observed. Rescigno et al. (15) reported that a decline in the 30% PSA after 4 weeks of abiraterone acetate treatment was significantly associated with a better PFS and OS. Patients who did not achieve a 30% PSA decline showed significantly poorer OS. In a clinical trial, Fuera et al. (16) showed that a 50% PSA decline after 4 weeks of treatment was significantly associated with a longer PFS and OS in patients on various AR-targeting therapies, including enzalutamide, abiraterone acetate and orteronel. The cohort of the Fuera's study included patients enrolled in clinical trials of cognate agents, with 78% being of post-docetaxel status. The authors confirmed the observations described above in patients treated with abiraterone acetate outside the clinical trial setting (16). A more recent study found that a very early PSA response (15 days after starting abiraterone acetate) was significantly associated with a better PFS and OS (17). Based on these findings, our current study is the first to show that the early PSA response is significantly associated with PFS and OS in patients with enzalutamide cohort.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Median rPFS and OS in terms of early PSA responses.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Predictors estimating early PSA responses: multivariate analysis.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Waterfall plots showing the best responses in terms of changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels from baseline in patients treated with enzalutamide. Left panels: pre-docetaxel group. Right panels: post-docetaxel group. A 50% PSA response was observed in 69.2% and 36.0% of patients in pre- and post-docetaxel groups, respectively (p=0.024).

Identification of pretreatment biomarkers predicting the responses to AR-targeting agents would allow optimal use of such agents and taxanes. The responses to primary androgen deprivation therapy are considered to be key when estimating responses to subsequent CRPC treatment. Chi et al. (19) proposed that 12 months was the key time at which to evaluate responses to AR-targeting agents and recommended that patients showing shorter times to CRPC should be considered for upfront use of docetaxel. Sonpavde et al. (20) proposed that a time of 16 months to CRPC should trigger upfront use of chemotherapy (20). In our present study, a time of 16 months to mCRPC significantly predicted a 50% PSA response. Other factors, including the Gleason score and the TMPRSS2-ERG translocation, did not appear to estimate the response to abiraterone acetate (21, 22). The baseline testosterone level was reported to be significantly prognostic of OS, but did not predict the response to treatment (23). In our current study, the baseline hemoglobin and ALP levels were significantly associated with the prognosis of OS. One of the potential pretreatment prognostic factors is the AR-V7 expression level in CTCs (12-14). Although the cohort studied was small, Antonarakis et al. (13) reported that the AR-V7 expression level in CTCs was prognostic of the outcomes of CRPC treatment. Further studies using liquid biopsies that include CTCs and cell-free DNA are warranted to establish robust biomarkers, which were cited in PCWG3 (24).

PSA flare is an important feature of an early change in the PSA level. The clinical significance of an early PSA rise has been characterized in patients treated with docetaxel. PSA flares occurred in 7.6% to 13.8% of patients and four courses of docetaxel were, at least, recommended (25). In terms of AR-targeting agents, PSA flare has been reported in patients treated with abiraterone acetate (26), but in less than 10% percent, and did not affect prognosis. Since AR-targeting agents affect AR action by ligand depletion or interference with signal transduction, a transient rise in PSA would be expected to be rare. Nelson (27) categorized prostate cancer cells into molecular states based on ligand-AR interactions. Enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate act in state II; the cancer cells undergo ligand depletion or interference with AR signal transduction. Eventually, the AR becomes activated by mutation, splicing variation or aberrant stimulation by cytokines (state III). We suggest that an early PSA response depends on the ratio of state II to state III cells. Further basic studies are required to prove this.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Radiographic progression-free survival of 51 patients treated with enzalutamide in terms of a (a) 30% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and a (b) 50% PSA response. Early PSA responder showed significantly better radiographic progression-free survival (p=0.016 for 30% PSA response; p<0.001 for 50% PSA response).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Overall survival of 51 patients treated with enzalutamide in terms of a (a) 30% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and a (b) 50% PSA response. Early PSA responder showed significantly better overall survival (p=0.003 for 30% PSA response; p=0.002 for 50% PSA response).

The labeled dose of enzalutamide is 160 mg/day; we used 80 mg/day at the start of treatment. Generally, the dose was rescheduled to 160 mg/day within the first 1 to 2 months. As mentioned in the Result section, the initial dose did not significantly predict the early PSA response, rPFS or OS. Based on these findings, we analyzed all data of the current cohort. We are now exploring safety aspects in the same cohort.

Limitations of the present study include its retrospective nature and the small number of patients; the powers of analyses of groups stratified by docetaxel use are rather low. We also noticed that two different initial doses of enzalutamide were adopted in this cohort. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that initial doses were not predictive for rPFS or OS. In that sense, the clinical relevance in the current study would not be significantly affected by the initial doses of enzalutamide. However, an early PSA response was prognostically predictive in all patients treated with enzalutamide. The strong points of the study are the relatively uniform treatment strategy and follow-up featuring both regular PSA measurements and radiographic evaluation. Furthermore, this is the first report on the early PSA response in a Japanese mCRPC cohort treated with enzalutamide alone.

In conclusion, an early PSA response (4 weeks after initiation of enzalutamide) was significantly associated with a better rPFS and OS in a routine Japanese clinical setting. These findings will aid in the optimal use of enzalutamide by Japanese patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for radiographic progression-free survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VII.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    Kazuhiro Suzuki has served as an advisory board member of, spoken for, and received a research grant from Astellas.

  • Received August 9, 2016.
  • Revision received August 22, 2016.
  • Accepted August 23, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fujimoto N
    : Novel agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer: early experience and beyond. Int J Urol 23(2): 114-121, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Beer TM,
    2. Armstrong DE,
    3. Rathkopf,
    4. Rathkopf DE,
    5. Loriot Y,
    6. Sternberg CN,
    7. Higano CS,
    8. Iversen P,
    9. Bhattacharya S,
    10. Carles J,
    11. Chowdhury S,
    12. Davis ID,
    13. de Bono JS,
    14. Evans CP,
    15. Fizazi K,
    16. Joshua AM,
    17. Kim CS,
    18. Kimura G,
    19. Mainwaring P,
    20. Mansbach H,
    21. Miller K,
    22. Noonberg SB,
    23. Scher HI,
    24. Taplin ME,
    25. Venner PM,
    26. Tombal B
    : Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 371(5): 424-433, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Scher HI,
    2. Fizazi K,
    3. Saad F,
    4. Sasd F,
    5. Taplin ME,
    6. Sternburg CN,
    7. Miller K,
    8. de Wit R,
    9. Mulders P,
    10. Chi KN,
    11. Shore ND,
    12. Armstrong AJ,
    13. Flaig TW,
    14. Flechon A,
    15. Mainwaring P,
    16. Fleming M,
    17. Hainsworth JD,
    18. Hirmand M,
    19. Selby B,
    20. Seely L,
    21. de Bono JS
    : Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 367(13): 1187-1197, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ryan CJ,
    2. Smith MR,
    3. de Bono JS,
    4. Molina A,
    5. Logothetis CJ,
    6. de Souza P,
    7. Fizazi K,
    8. Mainwaring P,
    9. Piulats JM,
    10. Ng S,
    11. Carles J,
    12. Mulders PFA,
    13. Basch E,
    14. Small EJ,
    15. Saad F,
    16. Schrijvers D,
    17. Van Poppel H,
    18. Mukherjee SD,
    19. Suttamann H,
    20. Gerritsen WR,
    21. Flaig TW,
    22. George DJ,
    23. Yu EY,
    24. Efstathiou E,
    25. Pantuck A,
    26. Winquist E,
    27. Higano CS,
    28. Taplin ME,
    29. Park Y,
    30. Kheoh T,
    31. Griffin T,
    32. Scher HI,
    33. Rathkopf EE
    : Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 368(2): 138-148, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. de Bono JS,
    2. Logothesis CJ,
    3. Molina A,
    4. Fizaz K,
    5. North S,
    6. Chu L,
    7. Chi KN,
    8. Jones R,
    9. Goodman OB Jr.,
    10. Saad F,
    11. Staffurth JN,
    12. Mainwaring P,
    13. Harland S,
    14. Flaig TW,
    15. Hutson TE,
    16. Cheng T,
    17. Patterson H,
    18. Hainsworth JD,
    19. Ryan CJ,
    20. Sternberg CN,
    21. Ellard SL,
    22. Efstathiou E,
    23. Zivi A,
    24. Bianchini D,
    25. Loriot Y,
    26. Chieffo N,
    27. Kheoh T,
    28. Haqq CH,
    29. Scher HI
    : Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364(21): 1995-2005, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Tran C,
    2. Ouk S,
    3. Clegg NJ,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Watson PA,
    6. Arora V,
    7. Wongvipat J,
    8. Sitmith-Jones PM,
    9. Yoo D,
    10. Kwon A,
    11. Wasielewska T,
    12. Welsbie D,
    13. Chen CD,
    14. Higano CS,
    15. Beer TM,
    16. Hung DT,
    17. Scher HI,
    18. Jung ME,
    19. Sawyers CL
    : Development of a second-generation antiandrogen for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Science 324(5928): 787-790, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Loriot Y,
    2. Miller K,
    3. Sternberg CN,
    4. Fizazi K,
    5. de Bono JS,
    6. Chowdhury S,
    7. Higano CS,
    8. Noonberg S,
    9. Holmstrom S,
    10. Mansbach H,
    11. Perabo FG,
    12. Phung D,
    13. Ivanescu C,
    14. Skaltsa K,
    15. Beer TM,
    16. Tombal B
    : Effect of enzalutamide on health-related quality of life, pain, and skeletal-related events in asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic, chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PREVAIL): results from a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16(5): 509-521, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fizazi K,
    2. Scher HI,
    3. Miller K,
    4. Basch E,
    5. Sternberg CN,
    6. Cella D,
    7. Forer D,
    8. Hirmand M,
    9. de Bono JS
    : Effect of enzalutamide on time to first skeletal-related event, pain, and quality of life in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from the randomised, phase 3 AFFIRM trial. Lancet Oncol 15(10): 1147-1156, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Yamasaki M,
    2. Yuasa T,
    3. Yamamoto S,
    4. Hayashi T,
    5. Ogawa M,
    6. Sakura M,
    7. Masuda H,
    8. Fukui I,
    9. Yonese J
    : Efficacy and safety profile of enzalutamide for Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 36(1): 361-365, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Mukherji D,
    2. Omlin A,
    3. Pezaro C,
    4. Shamseddine A,
    5. de Bono
    : Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Preclinical and clinical evidence for the sequential use of novel therapeutics. Cancer Metastasis Rev 33(2-3): 555-566, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Watson PA,
    2. Arora VK,
    3. Sawyers CL
    : Emerging mechanisms of resistance to androgen receptor inhibitors in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 15(12): 701-711, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Watson PA,
    2. Chen YF,
    3. Balbas MD,
    4. Wongvipat J,
    5. Socci ND,
    6. Kim K,
    7. Sawyers CL
    : Constitutively active androgen receptor splice variants expressed in castration-resistant prostate cancer require full-length androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(39): 16759-16765, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Antonarakis ES,
    2. Lu C,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Luber B,
    5. Nakazawa M,
    6. Roeser JC,
    7. Chen Y,
    8. Mohammad TA,
    9. Chen Y,
    10. Fedor HL,
    11. Lotan TL,
    12. Zheng Q,
    13. de Marzo AM,
    14. Isaacs JT,
    15. Isaacs WB,
    16. Nadal R,
    17. Paller CJ,
    18. Denmeade SR,
    19. Carducci MA,
    20. Eisenberger MA,
    21. Luo J
    : AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 371(11): 1028-1038, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Antonarakis ES,
    2. Lu C,
    3. Luber B,
    4. Wang H,
    5. Chen Y,
    6. Nakazawa M,
    7. Nadal Paller CJ,
    8. Denmeade SR,
    9. Cauducci MA,
    10. Eisenberger MA,
    11. Luo J
    : Androgen receptor splice variant 7 and efficacy of taxane chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol 1(5): 582-591, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Rescigno P,
    2. Lorente D,
    3. Bianchini D,
    4. Ferraldeschi R,
    5. Kolinsky MP,
    6. Sideris S,
    7. Zafeiriou Z,
    8. Sumanasuriya S,
    9. Smith AD,
    10. Mehra N,
    11. Jayaram A,
    12. Perez-Lopez R,
    13. Mateo J,
    14. Parker C,
    15. Dearnaley DP,
    16. Tunariu N,
    17. Reid A,
    18. Attard G,
    19. de Bono JS
    : Prostate-specific antigen decline after 4 weeks of treatment with abiraterone acetate and overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2016 Mar 7. pii: S0302-2838(16)00245-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.055. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26965561.
  15. ↵
    1. Fuerea A,
    2. Baciarello G,
    3. Patrikidou A,
    4. Albiges L,
    5. Massard C,
    6. Di Palma M,
    7. Escudier B,
    8. Fizazi K,
    9. Loriot Y
    : Early PSA response is an independent prognostic factor in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with next-generation androgen pathway inhibitors. Eur J Cancer 61: 44-51, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Facchini G,
    2. Caffo O,
    3. Ortega C,
    4. D'Aniello C,
    5. Di Napoli M,
    6. Cecere SC,
    7. Della Pepa C,
    8. Crispo A,
    9. Maines F,
    10. Ruatta F,
    11. Iovane G,
    12. Pisconti S,
    13. Montella M,
    14. Berretta M,
    15. Pignata S,
    16. Cavaliere C
    : Very early PSA response to abiraterone in mCRPC patients: A novel prognostic factor predicting overall survival. Front Pharmacol 2016 May 18;7:123. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00123. eCollection 2016. PubMed PMID: 27242530.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Scher HI,
    2. Halabi S,
    3. Tannock I,
    4. Morris M,
    5. Sternberg CN,
    6. Carducci MA,
    7. Eisenberger MA,
    8. Higano C,
    9. Bubley GJ,
    10. Dreicer R,
    11. Petrylak D,
    12. Kantoff P,
    13. Basch E,
    14. Kelly WK,
    15. Figg WD,
    16. Small EJ,
    17. Beer TM,
    18. Widling G,
    19. Martin A,
    20. Hussain M
    : Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol 26(7): 1148-1159, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Chi K,
    2. Hotte SJ,
    3. Joshua AM,
    4. North S,
    5. Wyatt AW,
    6. Collins LL,
    7. Saad F
    : Treatment of mCRPC in the AR-axis-targeted therapy-resistant state. Ann Oncol 26(10): 2044-2056, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Sonpavde G,
    2. Wang CG,
    3. Galsky MD,
    4. Oh WK,
    5. Armstrong AJ
    : Cytotoxic chemotherapy in the contemporary management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). BJU Int 116(1): 17-29, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Fizazi K,
    2. Flaig TW,
    3. Stockle M,
    4. Scher HI,
    5. de Bono JS,
    6. Rathkopf DE,
    7. Ryan CJ,
    8. Kheoh T,
    9. Li J,
    10. Todd MB,
    11. Griffin TW,
    12. Molina A,
    13. Ohlmann CH
    : Dose Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? J Clin Oncol 27(4): 699-705, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Danila DC,
    2. Anand A,
    3. Sung CC,
    4. Heller G,
    5. Leversha MA,
    6. Cao L,
    7. Lilja H,
    8. Molina A,
    9. Sawyers CL,
    10. Fleisher M,
    11. Scherr MI
    : TMPRSS2-ERG status in circulating tumor cells as a predictive biomarker of sensitivity in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Eur Urol 60(5): 897-904, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Lyan CJ,
    2. Molina A,
    3. Li J,
    4. Kheoh T,
    5. Small EJ,
    6. Haqq CM,
    7. Grant RP,
    8. de Bono JS,
    9. Scher HI
    : Serum androgens as prognostic biomarkers in castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from an analysis of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31(22): 2791-2798, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Scher HI,
    2. Morris MJ,
    3. Stadler WM,
    4. Higano C,
    5. Basch E,
    6. Fizazi K,
    7. Antonarakis ES,
    8. Beer TM,
    9. Carducci MA,
    10. Chi KN,
    11. Corn PG,
    12. de Bono JS,
    13. Dreicer R,
    14. George DJ,
    15. Heath EI,
    16. Hussain M,
    17. Kelly WK,
    18. Kiu G,
    19. Logothetis C,
    20. Nanus D,
    21. Sterin MN,
    22. Rathkopf DE,
    23. Sovin SF,
    24. Ryan CJ,
    25. Sartor O,
    26. Small EJ,
    27. Smith MR,
    28. Sternberg CN,
    29. Taplin ME,
    30. Wilding G,
    31. Nelson PS,
    32. Schwartz LH,
    33. Harabi S,
    34. Kantoff PW,
    35. Armstrong AJ
    : Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: Updated recommendations from the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol 34(12): 1402-1418, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Nelius T,
    2. Filleur S
    : PSA surge/flare-up in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer during the initial phase of chemotherapy. Prostate 69(16): 1802-1807, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Burgio SL,
    2. Conteduca V,
    3. Rudnas B,
    4. Carrozza F,
    5. Campadelli E,
    6. Bianchi E,
    7. Fabbri P,
    8. Montanari M,
    9. Carretta E,
    10. Menna C,
    11. de Giorgi U
    : PSA flare with abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 13(1): 39-43, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Nelson PS
    : Molecular states underlying androgen receptor activation: a framework for therapeutics targeting androgen signaling in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(6): 644-646, 2012.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (11)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 11
November 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Consequences of an Early PSA Response to Enzalutamide Treatment for Japanese Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Consequences of an Early PSA Response to Enzalutamide Treatment for Japanese Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
HARUO KATO, YOSUKE FURUYA, YOSHIYUKI MIYAZAWA, TAKESHI MIYAO, TAKAHIRO SYUTO, MASASHI NOMURA, YOSHITAKA SEKINE, HIDEKAZU KOIKE, HIROSHI MATSUI, YASUHIRO SHIBATA, KAZUTO ITO, KAZUHIRO SUZUKI
Anticancer Research Nov 2016, 36 (11) 6141-6149;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Consequences of an Early PSA Response to Enzalutamide Treatment for Japanese Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
HARUO KATO, YOSUKE FURUYA, YOSHIYUKI MIYAZAWA, TAKESHI MIYAO, TAKAHIRO SYUTO, MASASHI NOMURA, YOSHITAKA SEKINE, HIDEKAZU KOIKE, HIROSHI MATSUI, YASUHIRO SHIBATA, KAZUTO ITO, KAZUHIRO SUZUKI
Anticancer Research Nov 2016, 36 (11) 6141-6149;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Efficacy and Safety of Enzalutamide in a Real-World Cohort of Japanese Patients With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Age Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index Strongly Influences Survival, Irrespective of Performance Status and Age, in Patients With Advanced Prostatic Cancer Treated With Enzalutamide
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pelvic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Impact of Surgery on Survival
  • Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Survival and Recurrence Pattern in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy
  • Small Bowel Lipomatosis: An Unusual Radiological Finding in Patients With Renal Cell Cancer on Pazopanib
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • enzalutamide
  • early PSA response
  • radiographic progression-free survival
  • overall survival
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire