Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

MicroRNAs: A Puzzling Tool in Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy

BARBARA D'ANGELO, ELISABETTA BENEDETTI, ANNAMARIA CIMINI and ANTONIO GIORDANO
Anticancer Research November 2016, 36 (11) 5571-5575;
BARBARA D'ANGELO
1Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center for Biotechnology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: giordano{at}temple.edu barbara.dangelo{at}temple.edu
ELISABETTA BENEDETTI
2Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNAMARIA CIMINI
1Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center for Biotechnology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
2Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
3National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), Gran Sasso National Laboratory (LNGS), Assergi, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIO GIORDANO
1Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center for Biotechnology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
4Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: giordano{at}temple.edu barbara.dangelo{at}temple.edu
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) constitute a dominating class of small RNAs that regulate diverse cellular functions. Due the pivotal role of miRNAs in biological processes, a deregulated miRNA expression is likely involved in human cancers. MicroRNAs possess tumor suppressor capability, as well as display oncogenic characteristics. Interestingly, miRNAs exist in various biological fluids as circulating entities. Changes in the profile of circulating miRNAs are indicative of pathophysiological conditions in human cancer. This concept has led to consider circulating miRNAs valid biomarkers in cancer diagnostics. Furthermore, current research promotes the use of miRNAs as a target in cancer therapy. However, miRNAs are an evolving research field. Although miRNAs have been demonstrated to be potentially valuable tools both in cancer diagnosis and treatment, a greater effort should be made to improve our understanding of miRNAs biology. This review describes the biology of microRNAs, emphasizing on the use of miRNAs in cancer diagnostics and therapy.

  • MicroRNAs
  • circulating microRNAs
  • cancer
  • review

Different classes of small non-coding RNA molecules, including microRNA (miRNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA) and PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) have been identified in eukaryotic organisms. Initially, non-coding RNAs were believed to lack a particular function, hence they were classified as RNA junk (1). Although the definition of RNA junk is still elusive (1), several categories of small RNAs are now recognized for their capability to control gene expression and participate in cell signaling regulation. Distinctive features of small RNAs are their length (20-30 nucleotides), as well as their association with Argonaute-2 proteins (2). MicroRNAs constitute a dominating class of small RNAs that regulate diverse cellular functions, including apoptosis (3), metabolism (4), as well as cell growth and differentiation (5, 6). Due the pivotal role of miRNAs in biological processes, deregulation in miRNAs expression alters normal cell functions, hence participating in the development of human disease, including cancer. In this review we sought to describe the biology of microRNAs, outlining the potential use of miRNAs in cancer diagnostics and therapy.

MicroRNA Biogenesis and Function

MiRNAs are endogenous, non-coding RNA molecules, of 18-22 nucleotides length, capable of modulating negatively gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. miRNAs are made by a multistep process that initiates in the nucleus and ends in the cytoplasm.

The majority of miRNAs are generated from “independent” genes (also known as intergenic miRNA genes), so called as they retain their set of promoters and regulatory elements (7). However, about 25% of miRNA genes is a portion of introns (intronic miRNAs) placed within the sequence of canonical genes. Intronic miRNAs share mutual promoters with genes wherein they are integrated. After being produced as a single transcript, an intronic miRNA is processed from introns sequences (8). Another category of RNA molecules is represented by miRNAs generated by entire intron sequences. These miRNAs are known as mirtrons (8-10).

The first step in the biogenesis of miRNA genes involves the activation of the RNA polymerase II enzyme that produces primary miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNAs). Pri-miRNAs are hairpin precursors of about 70 nucleotides and are further processed into shorter (10 nucleotides smaller), transcripts (pre-miRNAs) by the Drosha endonuclease complex (7). An exception to this mechanism is represented by the mirtrons pathway in which the generation of miRNAs does not require the activity of the Drosha complex; instead these pre-miRNAs are originated directly from the mirtron transcript, by splicing mechanisms (9). However, several other characteristics distinguish the processing mirtrons from canonical miRNAs. For a comprehensive study on mirtrons biogenesis, refer to Wen et al. (10).

Once produced, pre-miRNAs are transported to the cytoplasm where they are cleaved by the endonuclease enzyme Dicer into double-stranded 20-21 nucleotides miRNAs, each containing a guide strand, which is complementary to the target RNA messenger (mRNA), and a pairing strand referred as passenger strand. When a duplex miRNA unwinds, the passenger strand is degraded, while the guide strand (now considered as mature miRNA) is associated with Argonaute-2 proteins that initiate the loading of the mature miRNA into the miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC) (11). Once assembled, miRISC targets and silences specific mRNAs. The selection of mRNA by the miRISC is determined by the degree of complementarity between the region at 5’ end of the miRNA-loaded in the complex and 3’UTR site on the mRNA. miRISC can perform two alternative silencing mechanisms: it can inhibit the translation of mRNA or, induce the mRNA degradation. The nature of control adopted by miRISC depends on whether the sequence of the miRNA-loaded in the complex shows partial or full complementarity with the sequence of the target mRNA: sequences that match only partially lead to repression of the translation, while a sequence perfect matching triggers mRNA degradation (8, 12).

MicroRNAs and Cancer

Due the pivotal role of miRNAs in biological processes, deregulation in miRNAs expression participates in cancer initiation and progression (13). Our collaborative study by Cattaneo et al. has determined a specific miRNA signature with a potential biomarker feature in acute myeloid leukemia (14). Similarly, numerous investigations have approached the identification of specific miRNAs as biomarkers and biotargets in human cancer (15).

MicroRNAs either have tumor suppressor capability (e.g., miR-29b and miRNA-30-5p) (16, 17) or display oncogenic characteristics (e.g., mir-17-92 cluster) (18), both of which influence cell growth (19).

Similarly to proteins, miRNA dysfunction depends on several reasons: alteration in miRNA expression can be a result of miRNA gene mutations (20), epigenetic modifications (21) or deficiency in the miRNA processing pathway (22). Also, genetic mutation, as well as epigenetic modification of miRNAs genes, have been correlated with cancer (8).

Circulating miRNAs in Cancer Diagnosis

Successive to their initial identification in tissues, microRNAs have been found in various biological fluids, including plasma, serum, saliva, milk and cerebrospinal fluid. Non-cellular microRNAs, also known as circulating miRNAs, display a high grade of stability despite their RNA nature (23). Studies have demonstrated that circulating miRNAs are packed into particular carriers and, therefore, protected from the degrading activity of RNAse enzymes, highly abundant in body fluids (23). Exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies, as well as lipoprotein complex (high-density lipoprotein (HDL)), all have been identified as non-cellular miRNAs carriers. However, the majority of circulating miRNAs seems associated in a stable complex with Argonaute-2 proteins (23). Despite the initial belief that non-cellular miRNAs were products of cell degradation with no specific functions, it has been suggested that these non-cellular miRNAs may represent signaling molecules with a definite role in cell-cell communication (24). Likely to cellular miRNAs, studies suggested that changes in the profile of circulating miRNAs are correlated with a pathophysiological condition of human cancer. In line with this concept, data achieved from our studies indicated that blood levels of miR-22, miR-24 and miR-34a are correlated with advanced stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (25). Also, several other cell-free miRNAs (e.g. miR-429, miR-205, miR-200b, miR-203, miR-125b and miR-34b) have been validated as diagnostic tools in NSCLC (26), as well as gastric cancer (27). Furthermore, studies demonstrated that high plasma levels of miR-19a are a favorable prognostic factor in patients with metastatic HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer (28).

At present, several clinical trials are investigating circulating miRNAs as biomarkers. For example, in patients with glioma associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01595139), the microRNAs blood profile is being evaluated to identify circulating microRNAs that would be suitable as predictive/diagnostic markers for glioma associated with NF-1. Also, many clinical studies are focusing on detecting circulating miRNAs biomarkers in breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02065908 and NCT0172285), hepatocellular carcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02448056), as well as pediatric cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01541800).

Challenges of Circulating miRNAs in Cancer Diagnosis

The discovery of circulating miRNAs has suggested the use of these microRNA molecules as biomarkers. In fact, non-cellular miRNAs characteristics, namely their extraordinary resistance to degrading processes, and miRNAs presence in body fluids, which makes them detectable with non-invasive techniques, together with their correlation with pathological conditions, have made these cell-free molecules suitable candidates as predictive factors, as well as diagnostic markers.

However, studies in both cancer and non-neoplastic field, devoted in placing circulating miRNAs among biological markers, remain still much elusive. The effort in finding specific miRNAs for each disease has failed (29). In fact, several miRNAs has been found associated with a broad range of conditions. For example, the non-cellular miR-141 has been reported in the blood of pregnant women (30), as well as in patients with prostate and several other cancers (31). That has raised an important question: What does a change in the circulating miRNA profile mean? Is it a biomarker of a particular condition or a simple sign of a general state of the disease? (29). As suggested by Witwer the answer to this question depends on what we contemplate as cell-free miRNAs (29). We can assume that the pool of circulating miRNAs contains two types of miRNAs: miRNAs complexed with the Argonaute-2 proteins and vesicle-packed miRNAs (23). Currently, the common idea is that microRNAs encapsulated in the exosomes participate in intracellular signaling. Conversely, miRNAs-Argonaute-2 proteins complexes represent only cell by-products that accumulate in the extracellular fluids (23). This suggests that one way to identify miRNAs suitable as biomarkers should be in focalizing the attention on vesicular miRNAs, instead of continuing the study of the entire circulating pool of molecules (29).

MicroRNA as Therapeutic Target

MicroRNAs have been demonstrated to regulate fundamental cellular processes and, thus, their alteration has been correlated with a variety of human cancers. Due to their central role in human biology, a great enthusiasm has been posed in the use of miRNAs as a target in cancer therapy. Currently, several technologies are available to manipulate specific miRNAs, resulting in either their activation or inhibition (32, 33). The most common approaches used to abolish the miRNAs functionality consists of synthetic antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) (34, 35). Despite the poor stability of these molecules, ASOs can be chemically manipulated to enhance their pharmacokinetics (33). Regardless the chemical modification, ASOs are commonly referred as anti-miRs (33). However, cholesterol-conjugated ASOs are termed antagomirs (34, 35). Anti-miRs bind native miRNAs, through base pair matching, and prevent miRNA-mRNA interaction (33). The same concept of antisense complementarity has been used to realize miRNA sponges. A miRNA sponge consists of multiple miRNAs antisense molecules linked together to form a unique structure that can sequester and knockdown the activity of an entire pool of sequence-correlated miRNAs (36). The miRNA inhibition transcript can also be carried out by using specific drugs that alter the biogenesis of the mature miRNA transcript (37, 38).

The last decade has witnessed a considerable increase in cancer researchers devoted to exploring the therapeutic capability of miRNAs (39). The manipulation of miRNAs has been showed to undermine cancer progression. The reactivation of tumor suppressor miRNAs, such as miR-29b or miRNA-30-5p, in myeloma cells, has therapeutic effects (40, 41). On the other hand, miR-21 has been demonstrated to have an oncogenic feature (42). We proved that inhibition of the miR-21 halts the progression of multiple myeloma (MM) (43). In addition to blood cancer, the therapeutic potential of miRNAs has been addressed in different types of cancer including, but not limited to, glioblastoma (44), retinoblastoma (45) and leukemia (46).

Challenges of miRNA-based Therapies

MiRNA-based therapies pose challenges correlated to miRNA tissue-specific delivery and toxicity. The poor relative stability in the biological fluid, as well as the negative charge of mRNA molecules, make difficult the cellular uptake of miRNAs and their specific distribution into tissue (47, 48). To overcome these obstacles many strategies, including viral vector transportation, nanoparticle and cationic lipids inclusion, as well as chemical modification, have been investigated (49-53). However, approaches, such as anti-miRs and cationic lipids-linked miRNAs delivery, have elicited toxicity in vivo (39). Given miRNA-based therapies, an additional aspect to consider is that miRNAs regulate several diverse genes. Therefore, manipulation of these molecules could create side-effects and increase the risk of toxic phenotypes (47, 49).

Conclusion

As miRNAs are still an evolving research field, our awareness of miRNA biogenesis function is still at its infancy stage. Overall, miRNAs have demonstrated to be potentially valuable tools both in cancer diagnostic and therapy. However, a greater effort should be made to improve our approach, both technically and rationally, toward miRNAs biology, to overcame current challenges linked to the use of miRNAs. The consideration of Witwer about microRNAs in cancer diagnostics is remarkable (29). The author suggested placing our attention on investigating only the fraction of vesicular miRNAs, as this is the unique pool of circulating miRNAs that likely retain a biological function. In our point of view, an advanced understanding of the mechanism governing the biology of these molecules represents the only valid approach to design a useful diagnostic miRNA-based tool.

Nevertheless, from the therapeutic standpoint, Garzon et al. consider critical to establish new methods that enable the efficient delivery of specific miRNAs in cancer tissue (39). In agreement with these authors, we believe that this approach would help find a suitable therapeutic solution against the progression and recurrence of cancer, as well as to minimize the risk of toxic effects elicited by the administration of miRNA-based drug.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Pennsylvania Department of Health for Sbarro Health Research Organization (SHRO) and the Italian Association for Cancer Research (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, AIRC).

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received August 9, 2016.
  • Revision received August 23, 2016.
  • Accepted August 26, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Palazzo AF,
    2. Lee ES
    : Non-coding RNA: What is functional and what is junk? Front Genet 26;6: 2, 2015. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ghildiyal M,
    2. Zamore PD
    : Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nat Rev Genet 10: 94-108, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Garofalo M,
    2. Condorelli GL,
    3. Croce CM,
    4. Condorelli G
    : MicroRNAs as regulators of death receptors signaling. Cell Death Differ 17: 200-208, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sacco J,
    2. Adeli K
    : MicroRNAs: emerging roles in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol 23: 220-225, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ivey KN,
    2. Srivastava D
    : MicroRNAs as regulators of differentiation and cell fate decisions. Cell Stem Cell 7: 36-41, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Gangaraju VK,
    2. Lin H
    : MicroRNAs: key regulators of stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 116-25, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hussain MU
    : Micro-RNAs (miRNAs): Genomic organisation, biogenesis and mode of action. Cell Tissue Res 349: 405-413, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Maqbool R,
    2. Hussain MU
    : MicroRNAs and human diseases: diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Cell Tissue Res 358: 1-15, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ruby JG,
    2. Jan CH,
    3. Bartel DP
    : Intronic microRNA precursors that bypass Drosha processing. Nature 448: 83-86, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Wen J,
    2. Ladewig E,
    3. Shenker S,
    4. Mohammed J,
    5. Lai EC
    : Analysis of Nearly One Thousand Mammalian Mirtrons Reveals Novel Features of Dicer Substrates. PLoS Comput Biol 1;11(9): e1004441, 2015 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004441.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Benoit MPMH,
    2. Imbert L,
    3. Palencia A,
    4. Pérard J,
    5. Ebel C,
    6. Boisbouvier J,
    7. Plevin MJ
    : The RNA-binding region of human TRBP interacts with microRNA precursors through two independent domains. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 4241-4252, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. He L,
    2. Hannon GJ
    : MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet 5: 522-531, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Xi JJ
    : MicroRNAs in cancer. Cancer Treat Res 158: 119-137, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Cattaneo M,
    2. Pelosi E,
    3. Castelli G,
    4. Cerio AM,
    5. D'Angiò A,
    6. Porretti L,
    7. Rebulla P,
    8. Pavesi L,
    9. Russo G,
    10. Giordano A,
    11. Turri J,
    12. Cicconi L,
    13. Lo-Coco F,
    14. Testa U,
    15. Biunno I
    : A miRNA signature in human cord blood stem and progenitor cells as potential biomarker of specific acute myeloid leukemia subtypes. J Cell Physiol 230(8): 1770-1780, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Reddy KB
    : MicroRNA (miRNA) in cancer. Cancer Cell Int 15: 38, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Amodio N,
    2. Bellizzi D,
    3. Leotta M,
    4. Raimondi L,
    5. Biamonte L,
    6. D'Aquila P,
    7. Di Martino MT,
    8. Calimeri T,
    9. Rossi M,
    10. Lionetti M,
    11. Leone E,
    12. Passarino G,
    13. Neri A,
    14. Giordano A,
    15. Tagliaferri P,
    16. Tassone P
    : miR-29b induces SOCS-1 expression by promoter demethylation and negatively regulates migration of multiple myeloma and endothelial cells. Cell Cycle 12: 3650-3662, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Rossi M,
    2. Pitari MR,
    3. Amodio N,
    4. Di Martino MT,
    5. Conforti F,
    6. Leone E,
    7. Botta C,
    8. Paolino FM,
    9. Del Giudice T,
    10. Iuliano E,
    11. Caraglia M,
    12. Ferrarini M,
    13. Giordano A,
    14. Tagliaferri P,
    15. Tassone P
    : miR-29b negatively regulates human osteoclastic cell differentiation and function: Implications for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease. J Cell Physiol 228(7): 1506-1515, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Olive V,
    2. Li Q,
    3. He L
    : mir-17-92: A polycistronic oncomir with pleiotropic functions. Immunol Rev 253: 158-166, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Esquela-Kerscher A,
    2. Slack FJ
    : Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 6: 259-269, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Calin GA,
    2. Dumitru CD,
    3. Shimizu M,
    4. Bichi R,
    5. Zupo S,
    6. Noch E,
    7. Aldler H,
    8. Rattan S,
    9. Keating M,
    10. Rai K,
    11. Rassenti L,
    12. Kipps T,
    13. Negrini M,
    14. Bullrich F,
    15. Croce CM
    : Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro-RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 15524-15529, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Toyota M,
    2. Suzuki H,
    3. Sasaki Y,
    4. Maruyama R,
    5. Imai K,
    6. Shinomura Y,
    7. Tokino T
    : Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-34b/c and B-cell translocation gene 4 is associated with CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 68: 4123-4132, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Kumar MS,
    2. Lu J,
    3. Mercer KL,
    4. Golub TR,
    5. Jacks T
    : Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Nat Genet 39: 673-677, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Turchinovich A,
    2. Weiz L,
    3. Langheinz A,
    4. Burwinkel B
    : Characterization of extracellular circulating microRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 7223-7233, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Hruštincová Votavová,
    2. Merkerová Dostálová
    : Circulating MicroRNAs: Methodological Aspects in Detection of These Biomarkers. Folia Biol (Praha) 61: 203-218, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Franchina T,
    2. Amodeo V,
    3. Bronte G,
    4. Savio G,
    5. Ricciardi GRR,
    6. Picciotto M,
    7. Russo A,
    8. Giordano A,
    9. Adamo V
    : Circulating miR-22, miR-24 and miR-34a as Novel Predictive Biomarkers to Pemetrexed-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Cell Physiol 229: 97-99, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Halvorsen AR,
    2. Bjaanæs M,
    3. LeBlanc M,
    4. Holm AM,
    5. Bolstad N,
    6. Rubio L,
    7. Peñalver JC,
    8. Cervera J,
    9. Mojarrieta JC,
    10. López-Guerrero JA,
    11. Brustugun OT,
    12. Helland A
    : A unique set of 6 circulating microRNAs for early detection of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2016. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9363.
  27. ↵
    1. Qiu X,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Shi W,
    4. Liu S,
    5. Kang M,
    6. Chu H,
    7. Wu D,
    8. Tong N,
    9. Gong W,
    10. Tao G,
    11. Zhao Q,
    12. Qiang F,
    13. Zhu H,
    14. Wu Q,
    15. Wang M,
    16. Zhang Z
    : Circulating microRNA-26a in plasma and its potential diagnostic value in gastric cancer. PLoS One 11: e0151345, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Anfossi S,
    2. Giordano A,
    3. Gao H,
    4. Cohen EN,
    5. Tin S,
    6. Wu Q,
    7. Garza RJ,
    8. Debeb BG,
    9. Alvarez RH,
    10. Valero V,
    11. Hortobagyi GN,
    12. Calin GA,
    13. Ueno NT,
    14. Woodward WA,
    15. Reuben JM
    : High serum miR-19a levels are associated with inflammatory breast cancer and are predictive of favorable clinical outcome in patients with metastatic HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. PLoS One 9: e83113, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Witwer KW
    : Circulating MicroRNA biomarker studies: Pitfalls and potential solutions. Clin Chem 61: 56-63, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Chim SSC,
    2. Shing TKF,
    3. Hung ECW,
    4. Leung TY,
    5. Lau TK,
    6. Chiu RWK,
    7. Lo YMD
    : Detection and characterization of placental microRNAs in maternal plasma. Clin Chem 54: 482-490, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Mitchell PS,
    2. Parkin RK,
    3. Kroh EM,
    4. Fritz BR,
    5. Wyman SK,
    6. Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL,
    7. Peterson A,
    8. Noteboom J,
    9. O'Briant KC,
    10. Allen A,
    11. Lin DW,
    12. Urban N,
    13. Drescher CW,
    14. Knudsen BS,
    15. Stirewalt DL,
    16. Gentleman R,
    17. Vessella RL,
    18. Nelson PS,
    19. Martin DB,
    20. Tewari M
    : Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 10513-10518, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Van Rooij E,
    2. Purcell AL,
    3. Levin AA
    : Developing MicroRNA therapeutics. Circ Res 110: 496-507, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Abba ML,
    2. Patil N,
    3. Leupold JH,
    4. Moniuszko M,
    5. Utikal J,
    6. Niklinski J,
    7. Allgayer H
    : MicroRNAs as novel targets and tools in cancer therapy. Cancer Lett 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.03.043
  34. ↵
    1. Krützfeldt J,
    2. Rajewsky N,
    3. Braich R,
    4. Rajeev KG,
    5. Tuschl T,
    6. Manoharan M,
    7. Stoffel M
    : Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with “antagomirs”. Nature 438: 685-689, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Krützfeldt J,
    2. Kuwajima S,
    3. Braich R,
    4. Rajeev KG,
    5. Pena J,
    6. Tuschl T,
    7. Manoharan M,
    8. Stoffel M
    : Specificity, duplex degradation and subcellular localization of antagomirs. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 2885-2892, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Ebert MS,
    2. Neilson JR,
    3. Sharp P a
    : MicroRNA sponges: competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells. Nat Methods 4: 721-726, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Velagapudi SP,
    2. Gallo SM,
    3. Disney MD
    : Sequence-based design of bioactive small molecules that target precursor microRNAs. Nat Chem Biol 10: 291-297, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Tor Y
    : Targeting RNA with small molecules. ChemBioChem 4: 998-1007, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Garzon R,
    2. Marcucci G,
    3. Croce CM
    : Targeting microRNAs in cancer: rationale, strategies and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9: 775-789, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Amodio N,
    2. Di Martino MT,
    3. Foresta U,
    4. Leone E,
    5. Lionetti M,
    6. Leotta M,
    7. Gullà AM,
    8. Pitari MR,
    9. Conforti F,
    10. Rossi M,
    11. Agosti V,
    12. Fulciniti M,
    13. Misso G,
    14. Morabito F,
    15. Ferrarini M,
    16. Neri A,
    17. Caraglia M,
    18. Munshi NC,
    19. Anderson KC,
    20. Tagliaferri P,
    21. Tassone P
    : miR-29b sensitizes multiple myeloma cells to bortezomib-induced apoptosis through the activation of a feedback loop with the transcription factor Sp1. Cell Death Dis 3: e436, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Zhao JJ,
    2. Lin J,
    3. Zhu D,
    4. Wang X,
    5. Brooks D,
    6. Chen M,
    7. Chu ZB,
    8. Takada K,
    9. Ciccarelli B,
    10. Admin S,
    11. Tao J,
    12. Tai YT,
    13. Treon S,
    14. Pinkus G,
    15. Kuo WP,
    16. Hideshima T,
    17. Bouxsein M,
    18. Munshi N,
    19. Anderson K,
    20. Carrasco RD
    : MiR-30-5p functions as a tumor suppressor and novel therapeutic tool by targeting the oncogenic Wnt/ b-Catenin/BCL9 pathway. Cancer Res 74: 1801-1813, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Li C,
    3. Ju S,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Zhong R
    : Myeloma cell adhesion to bone marrow stromal cells confers drug resistance by microRNA-21 up-regulation. Leuk Lymphoma 52: 1991-1998, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Leone E,
    2. Morelli E,
    3. Di Martino MT,
    4. Amodio N,
    5. Foresta U,
    6. Gullà A,
    7. Rossi M,
    8. Neri A,
    9. Giordano A,
    10. Munshi NC,
    11. Anderson KC,
    12. Tagliaferri P,
    13. Tassone P
    : Targeting miR-21 inhibits in vitro and in vivo multiple myeloma cell growth. Clin Cancer Res 19: 2096-2106, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Silber J,
    2. Lim D a,
    3. Petritsch C,
    4. Persson AI,
    5. Maunakea AK,
    6. Yu M,
    7. Vandenberg SR,
    8. Ginzinger DG,
    9. James CD,
    10. Costello JF,
    11. Bergers G,
    12. Weiss W a,
    13. Alvarez-Buylla A,
    14. Hodgson JG
    : miR-124 and miR-137 inhibit proliferation of glioblastoma multiforme cells and induce differentiation of brain tumor stem cells. BMC Med 6: 1741-7015, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Subramanian N,
    2. Kanwar JR,
    3. Kanwar RK,
    4. Krishnakumar S
    : Blocking the Maturation of OncomiRNAs Using pri-miRNA-17 similar to 92 Aptamer in Retinoblastoma. Nucleic Acid Ther 25: 47-52, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Volinia S,
    2. Galasso M,
    3. Costinean S,
    4. Tagliavini L,
    5. Gamberoni G,
    6. Drusco A,
    7. Marchesini J,
    8. Mascellani N,
    9. Sana ME,
    10. Jarour RA,
    11. Desponts C,
    12. Teitell M,
    13. Baffa R,
    14. Aqeilan R,
    15. Iorio M V,
    16. Taccioli C,
    17. Garzon R,
    18. Di Leva G,
    19. Fabbri M,
    20. Catozzi M,
    21. Previati M,
    22. Ambs S,
    23. Palumbo T,
    24. Garofalo M,
    25. Veronese A,
    26. Bottoni A,
    27. Gasparini P,
    28. Harris CC,
    29. Visone R,
    30. Pekarsky Y,
    31. De La Chapelle A,
    32. Bloomston M,
    33. Dillhoff M,
    34. Rassenti LZ,
    35. Kipps TJ,
    36. Huebner K,
    37. Pichiorri F,
    38. Lenze D,
    39. Cairo S,
    40. Buendia MA,
    41. Pineau P,
    42. Dejean A,
    43. Zanesi N,
    44. Rossi S,
    45. Calin GA,
    46. Liu CG,
    47. Palatini J,
    48. Negrini M,
    49. Vecchione A,
    50. Rosenberg A,
    51. Croce CM
    : Reprogramming of miRNA networks in cancer and leukemia. Genome Res 20: 589-599, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Aagaard L,
    2. Rossi JJ
    : RNAi therapeutics: Principles, prospects and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59: 75-86, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Pan F,
    3. Holt CM,
    4. Lewis AL,
    5. Lu JR
    : Controlled delivery of antisense oligonucleotides: a brief review of current strategies. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 6: 673-686, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Dias N,
    2. Stein CA
    : Antisense Oligonucleotides: Basic Concepts and Mechanisms. Mol Cancer Ther 1: 347-355, 2002.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Malik R,
    2. Roy I
    : Design and development of antisense drugs. Expert Opin Drug Discov 3: 1189-1207, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Chiarantini L,
    2. Cerasi A,
    3. Fraternale A,
    4. Millo E,
    5. Benatti U,
    6. Sparnacci K,
    7. Laus M,
    8. Ballestri M,
    9. Tondelli L
    : Comparison of novel delivery systems for antisense peptide nucleic acids. J Control Release 109: 24-36, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zuhorn IS,
    2. Engberts JBFN,
    3. Hoekstra D
    : Gene delivery by cationic lipid vectors: Overcoming cellular barriers. Eur Biophys J 36: 349-362, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Chirila TV,
    2. Rakoczy PE,
    3. Garrett KL,
    4. Lou X,
    5. Constable IJ
    : The use of synthetic polymers for delivery of therapeutic antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Biomaterials 23: 321-342, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 11
November 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MicroRNAs: A Puzzling Tool in Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
MicroRNAs: A Puzzling Tool in Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy
BARBARA D'ANGELO, ELISABETTA BENEDETTI, ANNAMARIA CIMINI, ANTONIO GIORDANO
Anticancer Research Nov 2016, 36 (11) 5571-5575;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
MicroRNAs: A Puzzling Tool in Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy
BARBARA D'ANGELO, ELISABETTA BENEDETTI, ANNAMARIA CIMINI, ANTONIO GIORDANO
Anticancer Research Nov 2016, 36 (11) 5571-5575;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MicroRNA Biogenesis and Function
    • MicroRNAs and Cancer
    • Circulating miRNAs in Cancer Diagnosis
    • Challenges of Circulating miRNAs in Cancer Diagnosis
    • MicroRNA as Therapeutic Target
    • Challenges of miRNA-based Therapies
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • FBXL19-AS1 exerts oncogenic function by sponging miR-431-5p to regulate RAF1 expression in lung cancer
  • Post-transcriptional Regulation of MMP16 and TIMP2 Expression via miR-382, miR-410 and miR-200b in Endometrial Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cytokine-based Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities for IL-10
  • Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy in Complementary Oncology: A Systematic Review
  • Multimodal Treatment of Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • microRNAs
  • circulating microRNAs
  • cancer
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire