Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Subtype Is Associated with a Favorable Survival Prognosis in Patients Irradiated for Spinal Cord Compression from Myeloma

DIRK RADES, ANTONIO J. CONDE-MORENO, NIKLAS GEBAUER, TOBIAS BARTSCHT, JON CACICEDO, BARBARA SEGEDIN and STEVEN E. SCHILD
Anticancer Research January 2016, 36 (1) 375-378;
DIRK RADES
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Rades.Dirk{at}gmx.net
ANTONIO J. CONDE-MORENO
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NIKLAS GEBAUER
2Department of Medical Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOBIAS BARTSCHT
2Department of Medical Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JON CACICEDO
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BARBARA SEGEDIN
5Department of Radiotherapy, Ljubljana Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEVEN E. SCHILD
6Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: This study was performed to investigate the prognostic impact of the myeloma subtype on the survival prognosis of patients with spinal cord compression (SCC) from myeloma. Patients and Methods: In 238 patients irradiated for SCC from myeloma, the myeloma subtype and 10 additional characteristics were evaluated for survival. These characteristics were fractionation of radiotherapy, age, time from myeloma diagnosis to SCC, presence of extra-osseous lesions, additional osseous lesions, gender, time to developing motor weakness, ability to walk, number of vertebrae affected by SCC and performance status. Results: Immunoglobulin G subtype was associated with significantly better survival than other subtypes both at 1 year (80% vs. 50%) and at 2 years (56% vs. 30%) following radiotherapy of SCC (p<0.001). In the subsequent Cox regression analysis, myeloma subtype maintained significance (risk ratio=2.44; 95% confidence interval=1.56-3.85; p<0.001). Conclusion: This study identified myeloma subtype as being an independent prognostic factor of survival in patients with SCC from myeloma.

  • Immunoglobulin G
  • myeloma
  • spinal cord compression
  • radiotherapy
  • survival

Patients with myeloma account for 10-15% of all patients presenting with malignant spinal cord compression (SCC) (1). Myelomas are very radiosensitive tumors. Therefore, these patients were excluded from a randomized trial comparing radiotherapy (RT) alone to RT preceded by decompressive surgery (2). It is widely accepted that RT alone is the standard treatment of SCC from myeloma (1). For RT, conventional irradiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are available techniques. However, a practical guideline from the American Society for Radiation Oncology recommended that SBRT for SCC should not be used outside clinical trials (3). SBRT may result in late morbidity such as myelopathy and vertebral body fractures (4, 5). Therefore, the vast majority of patients with malignant SCC, including those with SCC from myeloma, receive conventional RT. If conventional RT is administered, several fractionation regimens are in use. It is well-recognized that patients with a poor survival prognosis should receive short-course RT and those with a more favorable prognosis, long-course RT (6-8). The most common long-course RT program is 3 Gy × 10 over 2 weeks. However, a previous study suggested that patients with an extraordinarily good prognosis benefit from RT regimens with total dose greater than 30 Gy, such as 2 Gy × 20 and 2.5 Gy × 15 (9). To be able to deliver the most appropriate RT to each patient with SCC from myeloma, the RT regimen should be adapted to the patient's survival prognosis. For precise estimation of survival, independent prognostic factors of survival are very helpful. Several prognostic factors have already been identified (10). The present study investigated the potential role of the myeloma subtype as an additional independent predictor of survival in patients irradiated for SCC from myeloma in the largest series of such patients reported so far.

Patients and Methods

Two-hundred and thirty-eight patients who presented with weakness of one or both legs due to SCC from vertebral myeloma were included in the present retrospective study. The patients received RT alone with either a short-course (8 Gy ×1 or 4 Gy × 5) or a long-course (3 Gy × 10, 2.5 Gy × 15 or 2 Gy × 20) RT regimen. In addition to the RT regimen, 10 further characteristics were evaluated for survival including the myeloma subtype (IgG vs. other), age (≤64 years vs. >64 years, median age=64 years), time from myeloma diagnosis to SCC (≤15 months vs. >15 months), extra-osseous lesions prior to RT of SCC (no vs. yes), additional osseous lesions prior to RT of SCC (no vs. yes), gender, time to developing motor weakness prior to RT of SCC (≤14 days vs. >14 days), ability to walk prior to RT of SCC (not ambulatory vs. ambulatory), number of vertebrae affected by SCC (1 and 2 vs. ≥3) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG 1 and 2 vs. ECOG 3 and 4). The main focus was to determine if there was an association between myeloma subtype and survival. All of these characteristics were analyzed with respect to survival with Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test (univariate analysis). Those characteristics that achieved significance (p<0.0045=alpha level of 0.05 after Bonferroni's adjustment) were subsequently included in a Cox regression analysis to identify the independent predictors of survival.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kaplan–Meier curves for survival according to myeloma subtype. The p-value was calculated with the log-rank test.

Results

Seven of the investigated characteristics were positively associated with survival in the univariate analysis, including IgG subtype (p<0.001, Figure 1), time from myeloma diagnosis to SCC of >15 months (p<0.001), no extra-osseous lesions prior to RT of SCC (p<0.001), no additional osseous lesions prior to RT of SCC (p<0.001), slower development of motor weakness prior to RT of SCC (p<0.001), ability to walk prior to RT of SCC (p<0.001), only 1 or 2 vertebrae affected by SCC (p<0.001) and an ECOG performance score of 1 or 2 (p<0.001). The results of the entire univariate analysis are shown in Table I.

In the subsequent Cox regression analysis, myeloma subtype (p<0.001), extra-osseous lesions prior to RT of SCC (p<0.001), additional osseous lesions prior to RT of SCC (p=0.021), the ability to walk prior to RT of SCC (p<0.001) and the ECOG performance score (p<0.001) proved to be significantly associated with survival. The time to developing motor weakness showed a trend (p=0.059) for association. The results of the complete multivariate analysis are given in Table II.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Univariate analysis of survival.

Discussion

During recent years, a great amount of research has been performed to improve the outcome for patients with myeloma (11-15). Myeloma of the vertebral body may lead to destruction of the bone, resulting in damage of the posterior wall of the affected vertebrae, leading to SCC. Out of all patients with SCC, every 7th to 10th patient has SCC from myeloma (1). When compared to patients with malignant SCC from other tumors, those with myeloma generally have a more favorable survival prognosis. Furthermore, myeloma is more radiosensitive than solid tumors. Therefore, patients with SCC from myeloma deserve specific consideration. Because of its extraordinary radiosensitivity, SCC from myeloma is generally treated with RT alone rather than decompressive surgery followed by RT (2). When delivering RT, it is important to use a fractionation regimen tailored to a patient's individual situation in order to provide optimal treatment results. Beside other factors such as patient comorbidity, performance status and distance to the radiotherapy department, the patient's remaining lifespan should be considered. To provide optimal patient care, it is crucial to know a patient's remaining lifespan as precisely as possible. For estimating this, prognostic factors are quite helpful. Several factors have been identified for patients with SCC from myeloma. In a previous study, a significant positive impact on the survival of these patients was reported for ECOG 1 or 2 (p<0.001), ability to walk prior to RT of SCC (p<0.001), no further osseous myeloma lesions at the time of RT (p<0.001) and no extra-osseous myeloma lesions at the time of RT of SCC (p<0.001) (10). In addition to these clinical factors, genetic markers were reported to be of prognostic significance. Myelomas with deletions 1p and 17p, as well as translocations t(4;14), t(14;16) und t(14;20) according to fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis were associated with worse prognoses (16, 17). This also applied to deletion those with 13q, deletion 17q and monosomy 13, when identified by chromosomal analysis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Multivariate analysis of survival.

In the current study, which includes the largest cohort of patients with SCC from myeloma, we identified an additional predictor of survival, the myeloma subtype. Patients with SCC from an IgG myeloma had a significantly better survival than patients with other subtypes. This new prognostic factor will likely further facilitate greater personalization of care for SCC from myeloma. Since the myeloma subtype was a highly significant and independent predictor, one may consider optimizing an existing survival score which was specifically designed for patients with SCC from myeloma, with the addition of myeloma subtype to that score (18).

In conclusion, this study identified a new independent predictor of survival in patients with SCC from myeloma. This new factor can contribute to a more precise estimation of an individual patient's survival time and to a more appropriate tailoring of treatment to the patient's personal situation.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    On behalf of all Authors, the corresponding Author states that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.

  • Received October 12, 2015.
  • Revision received November 3, 2015.
  • Accepted November 5, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Abrahm JL
    : The role of radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7: 590-598, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Patchell R,
    2. Tibbs PA,
    3. Regine WF,
    4. Payne R,
    5. Saris S,
    6. Kryscio RJ,
    7. Mohiuddin M,
    8. Young B
    : Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 366: 643-648, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lutz S,
    2. Berk L,
    3. Chang E,
    4. Chow E,
    5. Hahn C,
    6. Hoskin P,
    7. Howell D,
    8. Konski A,
    9. Kachnic L,
    10. Lo S,
    11. Sahgal A,
    12. Silverman L,
    13. von Gunten C,
    14. Mendel E,
    15. Vassil A,
    16. Bruner DW,
    17. Hartsell W,
    18. American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)
    : Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79: 965-976, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sahgal A,
    2. Whyne CM,
    3. Ma L,
    4. Larson DA,
    5. Fehlings MG
    : Vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Lancet Oncol 14: e310-320, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sahgal A,
    2. Weinberg V,
    3. Ma L,
    4. Chang E,
    5. Chao S,
    6. Muacevic A,
    7. Gorgulho A,
    8. Soltys S,
    9. Gerszten PC,
    10. Ryu S,
    11. Angelov L,
    12. Gibbs I,
    13. Wong CS,
    14. Larson DA
    : Probabilities of radiation myelopathy specific to stereotactic body radiation therapy to guide safe practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85: 341-347, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Stalpers LJA,
    3. Veninga T,
    4. Schulte R,
    5. Hoskin PJ,
    6. Obralic N,
    7. Bajrovic A,
    8. Rudat V,
    9. Schwarz R,
    10. Hulshof MC,
    11. Poortmans P,
    12. Schild SE
    : Evaluation of five radiation schedules and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression in a series of 1304 patients. J Clin Oncol 23: 3366-3375, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rades D,
    2. Fehlauer F,
    3. Schulte R,
    4. Veninga T,
    5. Stalpers LJ,
    6. Basic H,
    7. Bajrovic A,
    8. Hoskin PJ,
    9. Tribius S,
    10. Wildfang I,
    11. Rudat V,
    12. Engenhart-Cabilic R,
    13. Karstens JH,
    14. Alberti W,
    15. Dunst J,
    16. Schild SE
    : Prognostic factors for local control and survival after radiotherapy of metastatic spinal cord compression. J Clin Oncol 24: 3388-3393, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Lange M,
    3. Veninga T,
    4. Stalpers LJ,
    5. Bajrovic A,
    6. Adamietz IA,
    7. Rudat V,
    8. Schild SE
    : Final results of a prospective study comparing the local control of short-course and long-course radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79: 524-530, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Panzner A,
    3. Rudat V,
    4. Karstens JH,
    5. Schild SE
    : Dose escalation of radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) in patients with relatively favorable survival prognosis. Strahlenther Onkol 187: 729-735, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Douglas S,
    3. Veninga T,
    4. Poortmans P,
    5. Bajrovic A,
    6. Hoskin PJ,
    7. Rudat V,
    8. Schild SE
    : Prognostic factors for local control and survival in patients with spinal cord compression from myeloma. Strahlenther Onkol 188: 628-631, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Park S,
    2. Han B,
    3. Kim K,
    4. Kim SJ,
    5. Jang JH,
    6. Kim WS,
    7. Jung CW
    : Renal Insufficiency in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma: analysis according to International Myeloma Working Group consensus statement. Anticancer Res 34: 4299-4306, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Steiner N,
    2. Nachbaur D,
    3. König P,
    4. Willenbacher W,
    5. Gunsilius E
    : Long-term control in a patient with refractory multiple myeloma by oral cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Anticancer Res 35: 2165-2168, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Schmeel LC,
    2. Schmeel FC,
    3. Kim Y,
    4. Blaum-Feder S,
    5. Endo T,
    6. Schmidt-Wolf IG
    : Flunarizine exhibits in vitro efficacy against lymphoma and multiple myeloma cells. Anticancer Res 35: 1369-1376, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Medinger M,
    2. Halter J,
    3. Heim D,
    4. Buser A,
    5. Gerull S,
    6. Stern M,
    7. Passweg J
    : Angiogenic markers in plasma cell myeloma patients treated with novel agents. Anticancer Res 35: 1085-1090, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Schmeel LC,
    2. Schmeel FC,
    3. Kim Y,
    4. Blaum-Feder S,
    5. Endo T,
    6. Schmidt-Wolf IG
    : In vitro efficacy of cinnarizine against lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Anticancer Res 35: 835-841, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Fonseca R,
    2. Bergsagel PL,
    3. Drach J,
    4. Shaughnessy J,
    5. Gutierrez N,
    6. Stewart AK,
    7. Morgan G,
    8. Van Ness B,
    9. Chesi M,
    10. Minvielle S,
    11. Neri A,
    12. Barlogie B,
    13. Kuehl WM,
    14. Liebisch P,
    15. Davies F,
    16. Chen-Kiang S,
    17. Durie BG,
    18. Carrasco R,
    19. Sezer O,
    20. Reiman T,
    21. Pilarski L,
    22. Avet-Loiseau H,
    23. International Myeloma Working Group
    : International myeloma working group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: Spotlight review. Leukemia 23: 2210-2221, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Munshi NC,
    2. Anderson KC,
    3. Bergsagel PL,
    4. Shaughnessy J,
    5. Palumbo A,
    6. Durie B,
    7. Fonseca R,
    8. Stewart AK,
    9. Harousseau JL,
    10. Dimopoulos M,
    11. Jagannath S,
    12. Hajek R,
    13. Sezer O,
    14. Kyle R,
    15. Sonneveld P,
    16. Cavo M,
    17. Rajkumar SV,
    18. San Miguel J,
    19. Crowley J,
    20. Avet-Loiseau H,
    21. International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2
    : Consensus recommendations for risk stratification in multiple myeloma: Report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2. Blood 117: 4696-4700, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Douglas S,
    2. Schild SE,
    3. Rades D
    : A new score predicting the survival of patients with spinal cord compression from myeloma. BMC Cancer 12: 425, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 1
January 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Subtype Is Associated with a Favorable Survival Prognosis in Patients Irradiated for Spinal Cord Compression from Myeloma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Subtype Is Associated with a Favorable Survival Prognosis in Patients Irradiated for Spinal Cord Compression from Myeloma
DIRK RADES, ANTONIO J. CONDE-MORENO, NIKLAS GEBAUER, TOBIAS BARTSCHT, JON CACICEDO, BARBARA SEGEDIN, STEVEN E. SCHILD
Anticancer Research Jan 2016, 36 (1) 375-378;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Subtype Is Associated with a Favorable Survival Prognosis in Patients Irradiated for Spinal Cord Compression from Myeloma
DIRK RADES, ANTONIO J. CONDE-MORENO, NIKLAS GEBAUER, TOBIAS BARTSCHT, JON CACICEDO, BARBARA SEGEDIN, STEVEN E. SCHILD
Anticancer Research Jan 2016, 36 (1) 375-378;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • In Vitro Apoptosis Induction by Fenofibrate in Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy of Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer During PARP Inhibitor Treatment: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Uniformity Between Serological Biomarker Test, Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and Biopsy Histology in Triage of Upper Abdominal Symptoms in Gastroscopy Referral Patients
  • Renal Function With Enfortumab Vedotin in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Myeloma
  • spinal cord compression
  • radiotherapy
  • survival
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire