Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Clinical Marker in T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

MASAICHI OHIRA, NAOSHI KUBO, GO MASUDA, YOSHITO YAMASHITA, KATSUNOBU SAKURAI, TAKAHIRO TOYOKAWA, HIROAKI TANAKA, KAZUYA MUGURUMA and KOSEI HIRAKAWA
Anticancer Research September 2015, 35 (9) 4897-4901;
MASAICHI OHIRA
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAOSHI KUBO
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k-naoshi@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp
GO MASUDA
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHITO YAMASHITA
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KATSUNOBU SAKURAI
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAHIRO TOYOKAWA
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROAKI TANAKA
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUYA MUGURUMA
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOSEI HIRAKAWA
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Patients with clinical T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have an unfavorable prognosis, mainly indicated by the response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT), crucial to estimating long-term survival. Other prognostic measures include systemic inflammatory or immunonutritional indices such as the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) that have not been sufficiently documented. Patients and Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 91 patients with T4 ESCC treated at our Hospital between 2000 and 2013. All patients initially received CRT, including 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin or nedaplatin with concurrent 2-Gy/fraction radiation (total dose, 40-60 Gy). Curative tumor resection was undertaken in suitable patients on completing CRT. Patients were classified as GPS0, GPS1, or GPS2 based on C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤10 mg/l and albumin ≥35 g/l, CRP >10 mg/l or albumin <35 g/l, or CRP >10 mg/l and albumin <35 g/l, respectively. PNI was calculated as 10-times the serum albumin (g/dl)+0.005×total lymphocyte count (/mm3). The impact of the pre-treatment GPS and PNI on the prognosis of patients with T4 ESCC was investigated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Sixty (67%) patients responded to CRT (9 complete responses and 51 partial responses). Forty-one (45%) patients also underwent surgical resection of the residual tumor. The overall 5-year survival rate and median survival time were 27.0% and 11.8 months, respectively. In the cohort of CRT-plus-surgical resection, the 5-year survival rate was significantly higher than in the groups treated with CRT-alone (51.1% vs. 6.5%; p<0.01). On multivariate analysis, good response to CRT [hazard ratio (HR) =0.449, p<0.01], GPS1/2 (HR=2.151, p=0.015), and surgical resection (HR=0.282, p<0.01) were significant prognostic factors, whereas PNI was not. Conclusion: The GPS is a useful, simple survival marker for patients with T4 ESCC undergoing multimodal therapy.

  • T4 Esophageal cancer
  • Glasgow Prognostic Score
  • Prognostic Nutritional Index

Esophageal carcinoma, one of the most aggressive malignant neoplasms, is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide (1). In Japan, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), in contrast to adenocarcinoma in Western countries, is the main histopathological type of esophageal cancer that metastasizes directly with ease to adjacent vital organs, such as the tracheobronchial tree and aorta, and becomes unresectable (2, 3). Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered the optimal treatment for patients with clinical T4 ESCC with a good response to CRT, crucial to estimating long-term survival and good prognosis, whereas a poor response indicates a dismal prognosis. However, other prognostic indicators have not been sufficiently investigated thus far.

Recently, pretreatment nutritional status, including serum albumin, inflammatory status, including serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and immune status, including lymphocyte counts, have been found to influence long-term prognosis post treatment in various types of cancer. Immunonutritional indexes such as the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) have been reported to predict post-treatment survival in gastric (4), colorectal (5), and pancreatic (6) cancer. However, the utility of these indices in T4 ESCC have not been adequately documented. We hypothesized that the GPS and PNI scores before CRT are strongly indicative of long-term survival after CRT for patients with T4 ESCC.

This retrospective study aimed to elucidate prognostic factors, including the GPS and PNI, in patients with T4 ESCC who underwent multimodal treatment.

Patients and Methods

This study retrospectively evaluated 91 patients with T4 ESCC treated with CRT, with or without surgery, at the Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Hospital, between April 2000 and April 2013. The pathological diagnosis and classifications were made in accordance with the sixth edition of the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification of Malignant Tumors (7). The staging work-up was performed using endoscopy, computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography, and bronchoscopy. The absence of a fatty layer between the tumor and the aorta and 90° or greater angles of tumor contact against the aorta on three or more slices (slice thickness, 5 mm) on CT was defined as direct involvement of the aorta. Tumor protrusion into the lumen of the trachea on CT and irregular appearance of the surface of the membranous portion of trachea on bronchoscopy were defined as indicating direct involvement of the trachea and bronchus.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinical features of 91 patients with T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

CRT regimens varied across three major time periods. From April 2000 to April 2003, a low-dose 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin regimen comprising 250 mg of 5FU plus 10 mg of cisplatin was administered on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26 with concurrent external beam radiation of 2.0 Gy/fraction for a total dose of 40-60 Gy. Between May 2003 and April 2007, the CRT protocol was modified to replace cisplatin with nedaplatin, and surgical resection was undertaken on completing 40 Gy radiation in patients with resectable tumors, whereas 20 Gy radiation was added if the tumor remained unresectable or the patient refused surgery. From 2007 to the present, the CRT protocol comprised 700 mg/m2 5FU on days 1-4 and 29-32 and 60 mg/m2 nedaplatin administered on days 1 and 29 with concurrent 2 Gy/fraction radiation up to a total dose of 50 Gy followed by surgery for tumors curatively resected.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors of overall survival for 91 patients with T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent multimodality therapy.

The following variables were evaluated as prognostic factors: age, sex, clinical nodal status, preoperative performance status (PS), response to CRT, PNI, and GPS. With regard to the GPS, patients were classified as GPS0, GPS1, or GPS2 based on CRP ≤10 mg/l and albumin ≥35 g/l, CRP >10 mg/l or albumin <35 g/l, or CRP >10 mg/l and albumin <35 g/l, respectively (8). The PNI was calculated as: 10×serum albumin (g/dl) + 0.005×total lymphocyte count (/mm3), with a cut-off value of 40, based on the original study (9). All blood samples analyzed were collected before CRT.

Adverse events of CRT were assessed and graded by the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria version 3 (10). Response to CRT was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) (11) and Japanese Guidelines for the Clinical and Pathologic Studies on Carcinoma of the Esophagus (12) and classified into four categories: complete regression (CR) was defined as 100% tumor regression; partial response (PR) was a more than 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter of measurable lesions; stable disease (SD) ranged from 30% reduction to 20% tumor enlargement; and progressive disease (PD) involved more than 20% tumor enlargement or the occurrence of new lesions. All characteristic data were obtained from medical and nursing records. Informed consent in this study was obtained from all patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of overall survival for 91 patients with clinical T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Statistical analysis. Demographic data are shown as means±standard deviations. Comparisons among patient cohorts were made with analyses of variance, followed by either Student's t-test or the chi-square test. The overall survival durations for various sub-cohorts were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. The prognoses were compared by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of independent prognostic factors were conducted in a Cox proportional hazards model. Statistical significance was determined by p-values of less than 0.05. SPSS software version 22 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis.

Results

Patient demographics and oncological features are summarized in Table I. The male:female ratio was 74:17 and the mean age was 63.0 years in this study population. Organ infiltration by the esophageal tumor included tracheal involvement in 49 cases, aortic involvement in 37 cases, and both tracheal and aortic involvement in five cases. In total, 56 and 35 patients received cumulative doses of <50 Gy and ≥50 Gy radiation, respectively. Sixty (67%) cases responded to CRT and included nine (10%) CR and 51 (57%) PR, as per the RECIST evaluation system. The most frequent adverse event was leukopenia, with grade 3 or greater severity in 40% (37/91) of patients. CRT-related mortality occurred in one case due to radiation-induced pneumonitis, whereas surgery-associated mortality was observed in three cases. Forty out of the 91 patients (43.9%) underwent surgical resection of the residual tumor. Complete resection at surgery was achieved in 90.0% (36/40) of patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Clinical features of patients with T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma according to Glasgow Prognostic Score status.

In this study population, the overall 5-year survival rate and median survival duration was 27.0% and 11.8 months, respectively (Figure 1). In the cohort ofCRT plus surgical resection, the 5-year survival was significantly higher than in the group treated with CRT alone (51.1% vs. 6.5%; p<0.01). Tables II and III show results of univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively, for prognostic factors predicting overall survival in the whole cohort of patients with T4 ESCC. On univariate analysis, GPS, PS, serum SCC level, and response to CRT were significant prognostic factors, whereas good response to CRT [hazard ratio (HR) =0.455; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.264-0.783], GPS1/2 (HR=2.151; 95% CI=1.167-3.966), and surgical resection of tumor (HR=0.282; 95% CI=0.146-0.543) were independent prognostic factors on multivariate analysis. Figure 2 shows the overall survival curves for patients with T4 ESCC according to GPS status. GPS0 was associated with significantly better prognosis compared with GPS1/2 (p=0.001). However, PNI was not a significant prognostic factor in univariate (p=0.065) or multivariate (p=0.628) analyses. The association between clinico-oncological features and the GPS status of patients with T4 ESCC is shown in Table IV. Patients in GPS1/2 groups had a higher proportion of males, a higher rate of poor PS, and a higher value of serum SCC compared to those in the GPS0 group.

Discussion

The prognosis of ESCC involving adjacent organs is dismal because complete resection of T4 ESCC is technically challenging and difficult because of the difficulty in combining a resection of the tumor spread to adjacent organs including aorta and trachea. Response to CRT is reportedly one of most important prognostic factors in T4 ESCC. In the present study, PR and CR after CRT were independent prognostic factors with good correlation on multivariate analysis. Some reports show curative surgical resection post CRT for T4 ESCC is effective for long-term survival (13, 14); however, other reports suggest that post-CRT surgical tumor resection is not effective in patients who respond to CRT (15, 16). In this study, multivariate analysis revealed that post-CRT surgery was an independent prognostic factor. However, there could have been a significant selection bias wherein responders to CRT tended to be mainly chosen as the candidates for surgical tumor resection at our Institution. Therefore, the actual value of surgical resection may have been obscured.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overall survival curve of 91 patients with T4 esophageal cancer who underwent CRT with and without surgery. The overall 5-year survival rate and median survival duration was 27.0% and 11.8 months, respectively.

Conventionally, SCC and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) (17) are well-known tumor markers for ESCC. However, the sensitivity of these tumor markers is relatively low. Molecular markers such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (18) and p53 (19) in the resected specimen and biopsy samples obtained during endoscopy were reportedly useful as prognostic markers. However, determination of these specimen-based markers are costly and not clinically practical. Simple and inexpensive markers are desirable for establishing a prognosis in ESCC; therefore, we evaluated the utility of GPS and PNI for patients with T4 ESCC because these markers are easily obtained from blood samples. The GPS was allocated by serum CRP and albumin levels and the PNI was calculated from serum albumin and lymphocyte counts.

Recently, several articles have reported an association between systemic inflammation and poor long-term outcome in various cancer types. The GPS, consisting of the serum CRP and albumin levels, simply reflects the systemic inflammation status of patients with cancer. The GPS was initially introduced to determine its prognostic value in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer by Forrest et al. in 2003 (8). After that, many reports about a close association between GPS and prognosis in various cancer types have been reported in the literature. The present study showed that pre-treatment GPS was an independent prognostic factor in patients with T4 ESCC. However, most reports regarding GPS for ESCC investigated patients who underwent esophagectomy (20-22). Those studies also described GPS as reflecting deeper tumor involvement, higher numbers of nodal metastases, and more advanced cancer stage. On the other hand, in this study, most patients had the same cancer stage. In our study, GPS1/2 scoring was closely associated with the male sex, poorer PS, and higher value of serum SCC compared with patients having a GPS0 scoring. These findings suggest that the GPS for patients with T4 ESCC might be a synthetic marker for predicting overall survival because it reflects both tumor progression and patient background.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Overall survival curves of patients with T4 esophageal cancer stratified by GPS. The overall 5-year survival rate was significantly better in patients with GPS 0 than those with GPS 1 and GPS 2 (43.9% vs. 9.8%; p=0.001).

On the other hand, in this study, PNI was not associated with survival after CRT in patients with T4 ESCC. The PNI was initially reported by Onodera et al. as a useful tool for predicting prognosis in patients with cancer (9); it is calculated by using serum albumin levels and lymphocyte counts that reflect the nutritional and immunological status of patients with cancer. Certain reports have revealed that preoperative PNI is associated with survival after surgery in patients with gastric (4) and colorectal cancer (5). However, the association between PNI and long-term survival in patients with ESCC has not been completely evaluated. Feng et al. reported that PNI was closely associated with survival in patients who underwent esophagectomy and was also associated with tumor length, tumor grade, and nodal status (24). The utility of PNI for patients with T4 ESCC has remained controversial, and further studies are required to definitively evaluate this prognostic index.

This study has certain limitations: it was retrospective and conducted at a single center. In addition, the CRT regimen differed across different periods during the study duration. Moreover, nedaplatin, which we chose as a main chemotherapeutic agent for ESCC, is not the standard therapeutic agent used to treat for ESCC worldwide.

In conclusion, the GPS is a simple and practical survival marker for patients with T4 ESCC who undergo multimodal treatment. Aggressive treatment including surgery for patients with T4 ESCC accompanied by GPS1/2 may not be beneficial in terms of prognosis.

  • Received April 28, 2015.
  • Revision received May 30, 2015.
  • Accepted June 3, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Center MM,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Ward E,
    6. Forman D
    : Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69-90, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Enzinger PC,
    2. Mayer RJ
    : Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 349: 2241-2252, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Pennathur A,
    2. Gibson MK,
    3. Jobe BA,
    4. Luketich JD
    : Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet 381: 400-412, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Nozoe T,
    2. Ninomiya M,
    3. Maeda T,
    4. Matsukuma A,
    5. Nakashima H,
    6. Ezaki T
    : Prognostic nutritional index: a tool to predict the biological aggressiveness of gastric carcinoma. Surg Today 40: 440-443, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Maeda K,
    2. Shibutani M,
    3. Otani H,
    4. Nagahara H,
    5. Sugano K,
    6. Kubo N,
    7. Amano R,
    8. Kimura K,
    9. Muguruma K,
    10. Tanaka H,
    11. Hirakawa K
    : Low nutritional prognostic index correlates with poor survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer following palliative resection of the primary tumor. World J Surg 38: 1217-1222, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kanda M,
    2. Fujii T,
    3. Kodera Y,
    4. Nagai S,
    5. Takeda S,
    6. Nakao A
    : Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 98: 268-274, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Wittekind C
    : UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (Sixth Edition). John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, 2002.
  8. ↵
    1. Forrest LM,
    2. McMillan DC,
    3. McArdle CS,
    4. Angerson WJ,
    5. Dunlop DJ
    : Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 89: 1028-1030, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Onodera T,
    2. Goseki N,
    3. Kosaki G
    : Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 85: 1001-1005, 1984.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program
    , Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event, Version 3.0 (Aug 9, 2006)
  11. ↵
    1. Therasse P,
    2. Arbuck SG,
    3. Eisenhauer EA,
    4. Wanders J,
    5. Kaplan RS,
    6. Rubinstein L,
    7. Verweij J,
    8. Van Glabbeke M,
    9. van Oosterom AT,
    10. Christian MC,
    11. Gwyther SG
    : New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 205-216, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Japan Esophageal Society
    . Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. Tenth Edition. Esophagus 6: 1-25, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Shimoji H,
    2. Karimata H,
    3. Nagahama M,
    4. Nishimaki T
    : Induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy for T4 esophageal cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. World J Surg 37: 2180-2188, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Pimiento JM,
    2. Weber J,
    3. Hoffe SE,
    4. Shridhar R,
    5. Almhanna K,
    6. Vignesh S,
    7. Karl RC,
    8. Meredith KL
    : Outcomes associated with surgery for T4 esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 20: 2706-2712, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bedenne L,
    2. Michel P,
    3. Bouche O,
    4. Milan C,
    5. Mariette C,
    6. Conroy T,
    7. Pezet D,
    8. Roullet B,
    9. Seitz JF,
    10. Herr JP,
    11. Paillot B,
    12. Arveux P,
    13. Bonnetain F,
    14. Binquet C
    : Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 25: 1160-1168, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Stahl M,
    2. Stuschke M,
    3. Lehmann N,
    4. Meyer HJ,
    5. Walz MK,
    6. Seeber S,
    7. Klump B,
    8. Budach W,
    9. Teichmann R,
    10. Schmitt M,
    11. Schmitt G,
    12. Franke C,
    13. Wilke H
    : Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23: 2310-2317, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Nakamura T,
    2. Ide H,
    3. Eguchi R,
    4. Hayashi K,
    5. Takasaki K,
    6. Watanabe S
    : CYFRA 21-1 as a tumor marker for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus 11: 35-39, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Zhu H,
    3. Liu X,
    4. Wang Q,
    5. Zhang X,
    6. He J,
    7. Sun K,
    8. Liu X,
    9. Zhou Z,
    10. Xu N,
    11. Xiao Z
    : Epidermal growth factor receptor is a prognosis predictor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 98: 513-519, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Han U,
    2. Can OI,
    3. Han S,
    4. Kayhan B,
    5. Onal BU
    : Expressions of p53, VEGF C, p21: Could they be used in preoperative evaluation of lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? Dis Esophagus 20: 379-385, 2003.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Vashist YK,
    2. Loos J,
    3. Dedow J,
    4. Tachezy M,
    5. Uzunoglu G,
    6. Kutup A,
    7. Yekebas EF,
    8. Izbicki JR
    : Glasgow Prognostic Score is a predictor of perioperative and long-term outcome in patients with only surgically treated esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18: 1130-1138, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nakamura M,
    2. Iwahashi M,
    3. Nakamori M,
    4. Ojima T,
    5. Katsuda M,
    6. Iida T,
    7. Hayata K,
    8. Kato T,
    9. Yamaue H
    : New prognostic score for the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surg Today 44: 875-883, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Feng JF,
    2. Zhao Q,
    3. Chen QX
    : Prognostic significance of Glasgow prognostic score in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Saudi J Gastroenterol 20: 48-53, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kobayashi T,
    2. Teruya M,
    3. Kishiki T,
    4. Endo D,
    5. Takenaka Y,
    6. Tanaka H,
    7. Miki K,
    8. Kobayashi K,
    9. Morita K
    : Inflammation-based prognostic score, prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, predicts postoperative outcome in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery 144: 729-735, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Feng JF,
    2. Chen QX
    : Significance of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ther Clin Risk Manag 10: 1-7, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 35 (9)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 9
September 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Clinical Marker in T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Clinical Marker in T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
MASAICHI OHIRA, NAOSHI KUBO, GO MASUDA, YOSHITO YAMASHITA, KATSUNOBU SAKURAI, TAKAHIRO TOYOKAWA, HIROAKI TANAKA, KAZUYA MUGURUMA, KOSEI HIRAKAWA
Anticancer Research Sep 2015, 35 (9) 4897-4901;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Clinical Marker in T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
MASAICHI OHIRA, NAOSHI KUBO, GO MASUDA, YOSHITO YAMASHITA, KATSUNOBU SAKURAI, TAKAHIRO TOYOKAWA, HIROAKI TANAKA, KAZUYA MUGURUMA, KOSEI HIRAKAWA
Anticancer Research Sep 2015, 35 (9) 4897-4901;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Usefulness of Nutrition and Inflammation Assessment Tools in Esophageal Cancer Treatment
  • Strategy Treatment of cT4b Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Gastrojejunostomy for Asymptomatic Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Pancreatic Cancer May Contribute to Early Recovery
  • Feasibility of an Exercise Training Program Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Breast Cancer
  • Impact of Surgery Refusal on Overall Survival in Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • T4 Esophageal cancer
  • Glasgow prognostic score
  • prognostic nutritional index
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire