Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Novel Molecular Targets for the Therapy of Urothelial Cancer

BAGI R.P. JANA and YAN ZHOU
Anticancer Research September 2015, 35 (9) 4557-4567;
BAGI R.P. JANA
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Brjana{at}utmb.edu
YAN ZHOU
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

First-line platinum-based chemotherapy combinations are considered standard-of-care in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. However, long-term outcomes, including disease-specific and overall survival, remain poor. In addition, a number of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma have co-existing medical issues that preclude the use of conventional chemotherapy. Improvements in our understanding over the molecular mechanisms of urothelial cancer have led to first-generation clinical trials evaluating novel agents targeting molecular pathways that may be relevant, at least in sub-populations. Emerging information regarding outcome with agents targeting novel molecular targets in advanced urothelial cancer is discussed in this review.

  • Urothelial cancer
  • transitional cell carcinoma
  • novel molecular targets
  • targeted therapy
  • review

Urothelial cancer (UC) of the bladder is the second most common genitourinary malignancy in the United States and is the most common histological type of bladder cancer which accounts for more than 90% of cases and affects an estimated 76,000 people in the USA each year, causing 16,000 deaths (1). At diagnosis, 30% of UC are muscle-invasive which confers a significant risk of locally advanced or distant metastatic disease. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced or metastatic UC include combinations of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC), dose-dense M-VAC (DD MVAC) and gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC). An average response rate (RR) of approximately 50% and a median overall survival (OS) of 12-14 months are expected (2). Despite more than two decades of studies investigating a number of novel chemotherapeutic agents and combinations, including three-drug regimens (3), cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the only therapy shown to improve survival in any UC disease state. Major advances are unlikely to be made by adding a third chemotherapeutic agent to therapy for unselected patients (3). In addition, many patients are not candidates for conventional chemotherapy due to co-morbidities (4-6). Development of less toxic, more effective agents is, therefore, crucial. Although new-generation biological and targeted agents have been integrated into the treatment of other cancer types, these therapies have no current use in standard therapy for advanced UC. Recent advances in molecular biology have identified new targets (7). This article provides an overview of ongoing and reported clinical trials using novel molecular targeted agents.

Targeting Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis facilitates progressive tumor growth by providing adequate oxygenation to the tumor through endothelial cell proliferation, motility of endothelial cells through the extracellular matrix toward angiogenic stimuli, and capillary differentiation (8). In the case of cancer, abnormal amounts of angiogenic growth factors, namely vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), interleukin-8 (IL8) and angiopoietins, are produced by cancer cells that cause excessive angiogenesis, overwhelming the effects of natural angiogenesis inhibitors (8-12). A number of studies have suggested a relationship between angiogenesis, tumor behavior, and prognosis in UC (13). Based on these observations, it was hypothesized that anti-angiogenic agents alone or in combination with chemotherapy will improve outcomes in UC. Bevacizumab, is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that works as an angiogenesis inhibitor by inhibiting VEGFA. A phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with GC as first-line treatment for patients (n=43) with metastatic UC demonstrated a significant antitumor efficacy, with a 72% tumor response rate and a 19% complete response rate (14). A median PFS time of 8.2 months and a median OS of 19.1 months were recorded. Treatment-related hematological toxicities included anemia (49%), thrombocytopenia (26%), neutropenia (51%), and febrile neutropenia (4%). Bevacizumab-related non-hematological toxicities included deep-vein thrombosis/Pulmonary embolism (21%), incidence of which was reduced to 8% from 41% after an amendment reduced the dose of gemcitabine from 1250 to 1000 mg/m2 weekly. Other adverse events associated with bevacizumab included hemorrhage (37%), cardiac toxicity (30%), hypertension (21%), proteinuria (16%), vascular events (2%; aortic dissection), and renal failure (28%). There were three treatment-related deaths (central nervous system hemorrhage, aortic dissection, sudden cardiac death) in the study. Another phase II trial from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was recently published for the activity of carboplatin, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients (n=51) with metastatic UC (15). This study showed a 45% tumor response rate and a 6% complete response rate. The median PFS was 6.5 months and median OS was 13.9 months. Twenty patients (39%) experienced grade 3 to 4 toxicity, with a 20% of thromboembolic events (deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), it is possible that the high rate of thrombosis may be intrinsic to the UC (16).

Bevacizumab has also been tested in the neoadjuvant setting. A phase II study was completed investigating neoadjuvant GC plus bevacizumab followed by adjuvant paclitaxel and bevacizumab in patients with residual invasive tumor at cystectomy. A high postoperative complication rate was recorded, leading to early study closure (17). Another phase II trial at the MD Anderson Cancer Center was to evaluate the activity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DD-MVAC and bevacizumab for high-risk UC. of 2-year OS of 75% and pathological down-staging of 45% were reported (18). To better elucidate the role of bevacizumab in the metastatic setting, an ongoing multicenter placebo-controlled phase III trial (CALGB 90601) is comparing GC to GC plus bevacizumab for advanced UC (NCT00941331).

A multi-center, randomized phase II study is ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Icrucumab (IMC-18F1, VEGFR1 monoclonal antibody) or Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B, VEGFR2 monoclonal antibody) in combination with docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder (NCT01282463). Aflibercept, a fusion protein that is designed to bind to VEGFA, VEGFB, and placental growth factor had limited single-agent activity in patients with UC previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy (19). Trebananib, an angiogenesis-targeting angiopoietin-1/2 antagonist, has showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors including UC (20, 21). A phase II single-arm study of Trebananib (angiopoietins 1 and 2 inhibitor) is being studied in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of advanced UC after failure of a platinum-containing regimen (NCT01907308).

Sunitinib inhibits cellular signaling by targeting multiple receptor tyrosine kinases including all receptors for PDGF and VEGF. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that sunitinib has antitumor activity against UC as a single agent as well as in combination with cisplatin (22). However, clinical trial results of sunitinib in UC so far have been disappointing. A multicenter phase II trial with sunitinib in the setting of frontline therapy for cisplatin-ineligible patients has revealed modest single-agent activity with clinical benefit (partial response plus stable disease) of 58%, median time to progression of 4.8 months and median OS of 8.1 months (23). A total of 77 patients with advanced, previously treated UC were treated with sunitinib. Clinical regression or stable disease was achieved in 33 out of 77 patients (43%). The PFS (2.4 vs. 2.3 months) and OS (7.1 vs. 6.0 months) were similar in both cohorts (24). An early report of a phase II study of first-line sunitinib in combination with GC (n=45) yielded activity. But the study required modification with an alternative dosing scheme due to intolerance. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (80%), thrombocytopenia (60%), anemia (20%), and leucopenia (13%) (25). A recent double-blind, randomized, phase II trial evaluating placebo or sunitinib as switch maintenance (n=54) showed that maintenance sunitinib did not appear to improve the 6-month progression rate. The study was limited by premature closure and a small sample size (26). Sunitinib has also led to disappointing results when combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. The sample sizes of both trials were small due to early closure secondary to excess toxicity. The response rates were 22% to 49% (27). A phase II study of sunitinib in the first-line, platinum-ineligible setting is ongoing (NCT01118039). Another phase II study of sunitinib in the second-line setting is also ongoing (NCT00578526).

Sorafenib, another multi-targeted small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGF and other pathways did not demonstrate sufficient activity in phase II trials as a single agent, neither in the first- nor second-line setting (28, 29). In a randomized phase II trial (n=132), sorafenib did not improve outcomes in combination with GC in the first-line, advanced setting (30). A phase II study of sorafenib combined with GC in the neoadjuvant setting is ongoing (NCT01222676). Another phase II, multi-center trial of Sorafenib combined with GC in the first-line, and advanced setting is ongoing (NCT00461851). A third small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against the VEGF pathway, pazopanib, has been investigated in two phase II trials in second-line, metastatic settings that yielded conflicting results. One evaluating pazopanib in the second-line setting reported that 76% of the 41 studied patients derived clinical benefit (17% partial response, 59% stable disease), with a median OS of 4 months (31). In contrast, another showed pazopanib at 800 mg given daily for a 4-week cycle in patients with UC who failed at least one prior chemotherapy produced no response by RECIST criteria in the first 16 evaluable patients during the first four 4-week cycles of treatment. The median PFS was 1.9 months. The trial was recommended to be permanently closed due to futility (32). Recent phase I/II trial of combining pazopanib and vinflunine in the second-line, advanced setting was attempted but was interrupted due to toxicity. The initially planned phase II study was, therefore, not carried out (33). Two phase II studies of pazopanib in the second-line, metastatic (NCT00471536) or relapsed/refractory (NCT01031875) settings have been completed and results are awaited. Another phase II study of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel for refractory UC is ongoing (NCT01108055). Vandetanib is another tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and VEGFR. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study compared docetaxel with and without vandetanib in patients with advanced UC with progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. The overall survival and overall response rates were not different between the two arms. The toxicity of vandetanib plus docetaxel was greater than that for vandetanib plus placebo (34). Study of vandetanib in combination with carboplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride in the first-line setting is ongoing (NCT01191892). So far, disappointing inactivity to these drugs may suggest intrinsic resistance of UC, redundancy of the angiogenic pathways, or tumor dependence on alternate pathways.

EGFR- and HER2-targeting Agents

The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family is composed of four receptor tyrosine kinases. Among them, EGFR (HER1) and HER2/neu have been particularly studied the pathogenesis of invasive UC (35). EGFR is overexpressed in more than 50% of human UCs, and the level of expression correlates with stage, grade, and survival (36). Preclinical studies demonstrated potential cytotoxicity of EGFR inhibitors, making EGFR blockade a rational strategy in UC (37). Pre-clinical activity of cetuximab, a human/murine chimeric monoclonal antibody against EGFR, has led to phase I and II clinical trials in patients with UC. A phase II study was conducted to evaluate efficacy of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in metastatic patients with previously treated UC who received one line of chemotherapy in the perioperative or metastatic setting. A total of 39 patients were randomly assigned to 4-week cycles of cetuximab at 250 mg/m2 with or without paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2 per week. While cetuximab did not demonstrate activity alone, the combination of cetuximab and weekly paclitaxel in the second-line setting yielded responses in 25% of patients. The median PFS and OS were 16.4 and 42 weeks, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash, fatigue, and hypomagnesaemia (38). A phase II trial evaluated the effect of GC with or without cetuximab in patients with unresectable, locally recurrent, or metastatic UC (39). Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to the standard therapy arm consisting of GC, while 56 patients were randomly assigned to the cetuximab-containing arm (GC plus cetuximab at 500 mg/m2, on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle then continued on monotherapy with cetuximab after 4 to 6 cycles). Disappointingly, the combination arm led to more adverse events, including more thromboembolism, hypernatremia, rash, and fatigue and two deaths, but it did not improve PFS or median survival rates.

Gefitinib selectively inhibits EGFR tyrosine kinase (40). Pre-clinical study demonstrated the therapeutic potential of gefitinib in pre-clinical models of bladder cancer via inhibiting extracellular signal-regulated kinase and protein kinase B (AKT) phosphorylation, as well as EGFR phosphorylation (41). The Southwest Oncology Group studied the role of single-agent gefitinib in the second-line setting in unselected patients treated for metastatic UC (42). Thirty-one patients were enrolled, with only 3% partial response (PR) and the median OS was 3 months. The study was stopped after the first step because disease in the majority of patients (81%) had progressed by the first evaluation. The most commonly reported toxicities were fatigue and rash. Single-agent gefitinib in this setting is thus not recommended based on these negative results. No correlation was seen between expression of EGFR and response. Of the 31 patients in the study, 17 had an evaluable tumor biopsy specimen. Eight of these 17 patients had EGFR 2 or 3+ expression, while three out of 17 had HER2/Neu 2-3+ expression. Two had 2-3+ expression of both HER2/Neu and EGFR. There was amplification of p53 in 70% of specimens. The sole responding patient had EGFR 2+ expression, but no expression of HER2/Neu, and overexpression of p53. Of the 15 patients with progressive disease at first evaluation, four did not express EGFR, and seven had 3+ expression.

Another phase II trial, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial 90102, was conducted for the evaluation of gefitinib in combination with GC in the metastatic setting (43). A total of 54 patients were assessed, the overall response rate was 42.6%, the median time to progression was 7.4 months and median OS was 15.1 months. Although the combination appears active, the combination results were not significantly better than historical data for therapy with GC alone. Additional phase II trial of docetaxel compared to docetaxel-plus-gefitinib as maintenance therapy for patients already treated with first-line chemotherapy is ongoing (NCT00479089). Erlotinib is another reversible oral small-molecule EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A phase II trial showed that when administered in the neoadjuvant setting, erlotinib can have beneficial effects in terms of postoperative pathology and short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer (44). Twenty patients were enrolled to receive neoadjuvant erlotinib (150 mg once daily for 4 weeks) before radical cystectomy. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response and the safety of therapy with erlotinib. At the time of cystectomy, surgical pathology showed 25% of patients with no residual disease, 35% with down-staging to less than pT2 disease, and 75% had organ-confined disease. At 24.8 months of follow-up, 10 patients were disease-free, four with organ-confined disease had disease progression, and nine had died. The treatment was well tolerated, with rash being the most common side-effect. Another phase II trial (NCT00749892) is currently evaluating a similar role for erlotinib in the neoadjuvant setting.

HER2 has become a therapeutic target in multiple solid tumors. Studies have demonstrated that HER2 is frequently expressed in UC (45), and successful targeting of this pathway in other solid tumors makes it an attractive target in this setting. A phase II trial in treatment of naïve advanced UC for 44 patients with HER2-positive tumors were treated with trastuzumab in combination with GC and paclitaxel; 70% responded (five complete responses, 26 partial responses). The median time to progression was 9.3 months and OS was 14.1 months (46). Three patients died due to toxicities and cardiac toxicity was higher than expected (22.7% grade 1-3 events). A phase II trial evaluating single-agent trastuzumab in the second-line setting could not accrue due a low prevalence of HER2-expressing tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (3+) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (NCT00004856). Trastuzumab is also being evaluated in combination with weekly paclitaxel and radiation therapy for locally advanced HER2-amplified bladder cancer (NCT00238420).

Lapatinib, an oral dual tyrosine kinase inhibits EGFR and HER2, has been shown to have in vitro activity against UC cell lines (47). A single-arm, open-label, multi-center phase II study investigated lapatinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic UC that had progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. It demonstrated a response rate of only 1.7%. The median time to progression was 8.6 weeks, with median OS of 17.9 weeks. Clinical benefit (overall response rate plus stable disease) was associated with EGFR overexpression, and median OS was improved in patients whose tumors overexpressed EGFR and/or HER2/neu (48). Preliminary analysis also suggested that high tumor HER3; high extracellular signal-regulated kinases (pErk) and mutant p53 may predict resistance, while high phospho-AKT and high insulin like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) expression may predict sensitivity to lapatinib. A recent report from a double-blinded randomized study of lapatinib in patients with HER2-amplified solid tumors demonstrated that lapatinib monotherapy is associated with modest activity (49). A small study explored the feasibility of a combination of paclitaxel and lapatinib for six patients who were treated after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (50). An ongoing placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial in the United Kingdom is evaluating lapatinib as a switch maintenance strategy in those with stable or responding disease after first-line chemotherapy and those with EGFR and/or HER 2-expressing tumors (NCT00949455). Another small phase II trial is evaluating lapatinib for ~3 weeks preceding radical cystectomy in order to evaluate tumor tissue for biological activity. An additional phase I study is investigating GC with lapatinib in patients with previously untreated, HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic or locally advanced UC (NCT00623064).

A novel study is also assessing the affray of autologous cellular immunotherapy against HER2/neu in the adjuvant UC setting. DN24-02, is a autologous cellular immunotherapy product designed to stimulate an immune response against HER2/neu. A randomized, phase II, open-label study is evaluating DN 24-02 as adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk HER2+ urothelial carcinoma (NCT01353222).

The soy compound genistein is a phytoestrogen and of isoflavones category. Genistein has been observed preclinically to inhibit bladder cancer growth, with one potential mechanism being the inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation. A phase II randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigated whether genistein alters molecular pathways in bladder epithelial tissue when given at 300 or 600 mg/d for 14 to 21 days before surgery for urothelial bladder cancer (51). Genistein displayed a possible bi-modal effect (more effective at the lower dose) on bladder cancer tissue EGFR phosphorylation. Genistein should be further evaluated, possibly in combination with other agents.

Targeting Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor

The fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase which harbors activating mutations in UC, indicating a potential role for FGFR3 in tumorigenesis and offering a possible target for therapy for superficial bladder cancer (52). Indeed, knock-down of mutated FGFR3, inhibition with a monoclonal antibody, or with a specific FGFR3 inhibitor in mouse xenografts inhibited tumor growth (53, 54). The treatment of non-invasive bladder tumors requires tolerable agents, given the extended survival and long duration of therapy anticipated for these patients. Agents that block this pathway are under active development. A phase II clinical trial is investigating the efficacy of dovitinib, an oral FGFR3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (NCT00790426) as second-line therapy, with stratification for FGFR3 mutation status and this trial has been completed. In addition to activating point-mutations and amplifications, a recent report describes oncogenic FGFR3 genetic translocations and re-arrangements as an alternative mechanism of pathway activation (55). Ponatinib (AP24534) is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has also been shown to inhibit the in vitro kinase activity of all four FGFRs. A recent study demonstrated that ponatinib is a potent pan-FGFR inhibitor and provided a strong rationale for its evaluation in patients with FGFR-driven cancer (56). Another study investigated a novel inhibitor of FGFR1-3 and RNAi to determine the effects of inhibiting FGFR1 or FGFR3 in a panel of human bladder cancer cell lines. It was demonstrated that FGFR1 and FGFR3 have largely non-overlapping roles in regulating invasion, metastasis and proliferation in distinct ‘mesenchymal’ and ‘epithelial’ subsets of human bladder cancer cells. The results suggest that the tumor phenotype will be an important determinant of the biological effects of FGFR inhibitors in patients (57). FGFR holds promise as a therapeutic target, diagnostic and prognostic marker, and for screening tools for early detection and clinical management of UC (58).

Targeting PI3K– AKT-mTOR Pathway

The phoshinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)– serine/threonine kinase (AKT)– mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is an important therapeutic target. Approximately 21% of muscle-invasive UCs have activating PI3K mutations, while another 30% demonstrate evidence of PTEN mutations. In addition, 16% of patients were found to have inactivating mutations in tuberous sclerosis 1 (TSC1), an inhibitor of mTOR activation (59). Preclinical studies demonstrated that everolimus has activity against UC (60, 61). Everolimus as a single-agent has been investigated as a second-line agent in a single-arm study. A total of 45 patients with metastatic UC refractory to one to four cytotoxic agents were enrolled in this study. The primary end-points were 2-month PFS rate and the safety of everolimus, with the secondary endpoint being the response rate. In this trial, although everolimus did not meet its primary end-point, one partial response, one near-complete response and 12 minor regressions were reported. Median PFS and OS were 2.6 months (range=1.8-3.5 months) months and 8.3 months (range=5.5-12.1 months), respectively (62). Another phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of everolimus in advanced TCC after failure of platinum-based therapy. Thirty-seven patients with advanced TCC received everolimus at 10 mg/d until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Two confirmed partial responses and eight cases of stable disease were recorded, with a disease control rate of 27% at 8 weeks. Everolimus was well-tolerated. A higher baseline level of angiopoietin-1 and significant early plasma decrease in angiopoietin-1, endoglin, and PDGFA/B in patients with controlled disease suggested a role of the antiangiogenic properties of everolimus in disease control. PTEN loss might be associated with resistance to everolimus (63). Recent preclinical study showed that everolimus had a therapeutic effect when used in combination with cisplatin and could therefore be a useful anticancer drug combination for patients with bladder cancer (64). Everolimus is undergoing investigation in combination with paclitaxel in both the first- and second-line settings (NCT01215136 and NCT00933374). The first-line trial enrolls cisplatin-ineligible patients and administers everolimus alone for those with renal dysfunction and poor performance status, and in combination with paclitaxel in those with only one of these conditions. This strategy is based on the finding that combination therapy yielded poor outcomes in those with both renal dysfunction and poor performance status in a phase III trial that compared carboplatin-gemcitabine with methotrexate, carboplatin and vinblastine (65).

Temsirolimus has shown promise against bladder cancer in pre-clinical studies (66) and a phase II study in combination with GC as a first-line therapy (NCT01090466) has been completed. A phase II trial assessed temsirolimus as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic UC after failure of platinum-containing therapy. Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. The median time to progression was 2.5 months (77 days); median OS was 3.5 months (107 days). Four patients with stable disease were noted. Temsirolimus was well-tolerated. As grade 3-4 adverse events, fatigue (n=2), leukopenia (n=2) and thrombocytopenia (n=2) were observed. Temsirolimus seems to have poor activity in patients with progressive UC after failure of platinum-containing first-line therapy (67).

Immunomodulators

Over the past two decades, intravesical Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG), a preparation of live attenuated Mycobacterium bovis, has remained the most successful therapy for high-grade non-muscle-invasive TCC and carcinoma in situ of the bladder (68, 69). The possible mechanism of action of BCG involves an active host defense function against pathogens, including phagocytosis of urothelial cells to degrade antigens and present antigenic proteins on their surface, secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, and modulate the recruitment and activity of immune cells (70, 71). Intravesical immunotherapy with BCG to prevent recurrence of these tumors has been shown to involve the participation of three different Toll like receptors (TLR), TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 (72-75). In recent years, alternative immunotherapy involving the induction of innate immune responses via TLR activation have been explored, with promising results using in vitro and in vivo models of bladder cancer. Imidazoquinolines (TLR7 agonist), a class of synthetic immunomodulating agents have potent direct activity against bladder cancer cells by reducing cell viability and inducing apoptosis and cytokine production (76, 77).

Mycobacterial cell wall DNA complexes (MCC) are complexes of mycobacterial DNA oligonucleotides with components of the cell wall. Intravesical use of MCC showed antineoplastic activity, with reduced toxicity compared with BCG. Mycobacterial DNA was proposed to be the active component in MCC (78, 79). CpG-containing oligonucleotides (TLR9 agonist) (80-83), Helicobacter pylori neutrophil-activating protein (HPNAP) (TLR2 ligand), lipopolysaccharide and their derivatives have been tested as BCG surrogates in the treatment of UC(84, 85).

Cytoxic T Lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA-4) is a potent immunoregulatory molecule that suppresses antitumor response by down-regulating T-cell activation. Antibodies directed against CTLA-4 have been reported to enhance T-cell responses that lead to antitumor responses(86). A preoperative clinical trial with ipilimumab was conducted in 12 patients with localized UC (87). In this study, six patients were treated with 3 mg/kg/dose of anti-CTLA-4 and six with 10 mg/kg/dose of this antibody. Both doses were well tolerated. All 12 patients exhibited measurable immunological pharmacodynamic effects as demonstrated by increased frequency of CD4-positive T-cells in tumor tissue and in the systemic circulation.

Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG) is another promising target antigen that is expressed in a subset of bladder cancer. CDX-1307 is a protein consisting of a human monoclonal antibody targeting the mannose receptor genetically fused to the entire βhCG. Following binding of fused protein to the mannose receptor, CDX-1307 is internalized, leading to efficient antigen presentation to both CD4-positive and CD8-positive T-cells (88). Furthermore, a greater or more consistent immune response was observed when combined CDX-1307 with three immunoadjuvants, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and TLR agonists resiquimod and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized with poly-L-lysine and carboxymethylcellulose (89). This combined multi-agent regimen has been selected for a phase II clinical trial studying the feasibility of the CDX-1307 vaccine regimen when administered neoadjuvantly (with GC regimen) and adjuvant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed, muscle-invasive hCG-β-expressing bladder cancer amenable to resection with curative intent (89).

Lenalidomide, an immunomodulating and anti-angiogenic agent is also being studied in combination with GC as first-line therapy for metastatic UC (NCT01342172). Oportuzumab monatox (OM) is a recombinant fusion protein comprising a humanized single-chain antibody to epithelial cell adhesion molecule EPCAM linked to Pseudomonas exotoxin A. Once bound to the cancer cell, OM is internalized and the toxin moiety released into the cytosol where it induces apoptosis. A phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerability of intravesical OM in patients with UC in situ in second-line setting after failure of BCG treatment. A total of 46 patients received one induction cycle of 6 (cohort 1) or 12 (cohort 2) weekly intravesical OM instillations of 30 mg, followed by up to three maintenance cycles of 3 weekly administrations every 3 months. A complete response to OM was 41% in cohort 1 and 39% in cohort 2 at the 3-month evaluation; 44% achieved a complete response. The median time to recurrence in patients who achieved a complete response was 274 and 408 days in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate reversible bladder symptoms. OM was deemed effective and well-tolerated in patients with BCG refractory carcinoma in situ of the bladder (90).

Other Novel Agents

Dasatinib, an oral kinase inhibitor targeting the Src family proto-oncogenic tyrosine kinases, ABL, proto-oncogene c-kit, and PDGFR, displayed significant pre-clinical antitumor activity against Src-overexpressing UC (91). A study has been completed to determine feasibility and safety of treatment with dasatinib administered orally once daily for 4 weeks duration prior to radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (NCT00706641). Similarly, IGF-IR and MET proto-oncogene are implicated in tumor invasion and metastasis (92, 93). Decorin, a prototype member of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans, may act as a natural antagonist of the IGF-IR in UC (94).

Newer tubulin antagonists have been under evaluation. Nab-paclitaxel, a solvent-free albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel, is better delivered to tumors via molecular pathways involving an endothelial cell surface albumin receptor and an albumin-binding protein expressed by tumor cells and secreted into the tumor interstitium (secreted protein acid rich in cysteine) (95). A phase II study of single-agent nab-paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic UC led to a response rate of 32% and disease control rate of 53%. The median PFS and OS were 6 and 10.8 months, respectively (96).

Eribulin meslylate, a novel synthetic analog of halichondrin B, is a microtubule destabilizing agent shown to improve survival in patients with refractory breast cancer (97). Eribulin was administered as first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients and yielded a response rate of 37%, a median PFS of 3.9 months and median OS of 9.4 months (98). The agent does not require steroid premedication and appears to have a favorable toxicity profile. A randomized phase II trial is ongoing to evaluate eribulin mesylate in combination with GC for locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer in the first-line setting (NCT01126749).

A phase II study investigating single-agent bortezomib in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial tract TCC showed that it does not have antitumor activity as second-line therapy in UC(99). Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) controls multiple steps of mitosis. Volasertib (BI 6727), a first-in-class selective inhibitor of PLK1 was investigated in patients (n=50) whose disease progressed on chemotherapy. Volasertib showed early signs of benefit, with 14% patients exhibiting a partial response, and 24% had stable disease (100).

Conclusion

In summary, UC is a common and deadly cancer in which platinum-based regimens continue to remain the mainstay of therapy. Efforts to incorporate targeted therapies into UC management are ongoing, but so far without significant success noted for other common solid tumor types. A better understanding of its molecular biology is imperative to make advances. The lack of data supporting new therapies may also have been due to poor study accrual. Targeting angiogenesis, the PI3/AKT pathway and utilizing newer immunotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy seems most promising for future studies. Continued investigation of targeted therapies are needed to improve survival of patients with advanced UC.

  • Received May 14, 2015.
  • Revision received June 22, 2015.
  • Accepted June 24, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel R,
    2. Naishadham D,
    3. Jemal A
    : Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 62: 10-29, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. von der Maase H,
    2. Sengelov L,
    3. Roberts JT,
    4. Ricci S,
    5. Dogliotti L,
    6. Oliver T,
    7. Moore MJ,
    8. Zimmermann A,
    9. Arning M
    : Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 4602-4608, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bellmunt J,
    2. von der Maase H,
    3. Mead GM,
    4. Heyer J,
    5. Houede N,
    6. Paz-Ares LG,
    7. Winquist E,
    8. Laufman LR,
    9. de Wit R,
    10. Sylvester R
    : Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin/ gemcitabine (PCG) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) in patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy; EORTC30987/Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 25: LBA5030-, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    1. Galsky MD,
    2. Chen GJ,
    3. Oh WK,
    4. Bellmunt J,
    5. Roth BJ,
    6. Petrioli R,
    7. Dogliotti L,
    8. Dreicer R,
    9. Sonpavde G
    : Comparative effectiveness of cisplatin-based and carboplatin-based chemotherapy for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 23: 406-410, 2012.
    OpenUrl
    1. Galsky MD,
    2. Hahn NM,
    3. Rosenberg J,
    4. Sonpavde G,
    5. Hutson T,
    6. Oh WK,
    7. Dreicer R,
    8. Vogelzang N,
    9. Sternberg C,
    10. Bajorin DF,
    11. Bellmunt J
    : A consensus definition of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The lancet oncology 12: 211-214, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Galsky MD,
    2. Hahn NM,
    3. Rosenberg J,
    4. Sonpavde G,
    5. Hutson T,
    6. Oh WK,
    7. Dreicer R,
    8. Vogelzang N,
    9. Sternberg CN,
    10. Bajorin DF,
    11. Bellmunt J
    : Treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer “unfit” for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 29: 2432-2438, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jana BR,
    2. Galsky MD,
    3. Hahn NM,
    4. Milowsky MI,
    5. Sonpavde G
    : Novel molecular targets for the therapy of urothelial carcinoma. Expert Opin Ther Targets 16: 499-513, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Izawa JI,
    2. Dinney CP
    : The role of angiogenesis in prostate and other urologic cancers: a review. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal=journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 164: 662-670, 2001.
    OpenUrl
    1. Crew JP,
    2. O'Brien T,
    3. Bradburn M,
    4. Fuggle S,
    5. Bicknell R,
    6. Cranston D,
    7. Harris AL
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor is a predictor of relapse and stage progression in superficial bladder cancer. Cancer research 57: 5281-5285, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nakanishi R,
    2. Oka N,
    3. Nakatsuji H,
    4. Koizumi T,
    5. Sakaki M,
    6. Takahashi M,
    7. Fukumori T,
    8. Kanayama HO
    : Effect of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor inhibitor on proliferation and invasion in bladder cancer. Urologia internationalis 83: 98-106, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nguyen M,
    2. Watanabe H,
    3. Budson AE,
    4. Richie JP,
    5. Folkman J
    : Elevated levels of the angiogenic peptide basic fibroblast growth factor in urine of bladder cancer patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85: 241-242, 1993.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. O'Brien T,
    2. Cranston D,
    3. Fuggle S,
    4. Bicknell R,
    5. Harris AL
    : Different angiogenic pathways characterize superficial and invasive bladder cancer. Cancer research 55: 510-513, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Bochner BH,
    2. Cote RJ,
    3. Weidner N,
    4. Groshen S,
    5. Chen SC,
    6. Skinner DG,
    7. Nichols PW
    : Angiogenesis in bladder cancer: relationship between microvessel density and tumor prognosis. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87: 1603-1612, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Hahn NM SW,
    2. Zon RT,
    3. et al
    : A multicenter phase II study of cisplatin (C), gemcitabine (G) and bevacizumab (B) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Hoosier Oncology Group GU-0475. J Clin Oncol 27: 15s, 2009 (suppl; abstr 5018).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Balar AV,
    2. Apolo AB,
    3. Ostrovnaya I,
    4. Mironov S,
    5. Iasonos A,
    6. Trout A,
    7. Regazzi AM,
    8. Garcia-Grossman IR,
    9. Gallagher DJ,
    10. Milowsky MI,
    11. Bajorin DF
    : Phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 31: 724-730, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Apolo AMR AB,
    2. Milowsky MI,
    3. Bajorin DF
    : Vascular thromboembolic events in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial cancer (UC) treated with carboplatin/gemcitabine alone or in combination with bevacizumab. ASCO Proceedings J Clin Oncol 27: 15s, 2009 (suppl; abstr 5074) 2009.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Chaudhary ARG UB,
    2. Brisendine A,
    3. Kraft AS,
    4. Clarke H,
    5. Keane TE
    : Phase II trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab followed by radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl 7; abstr 276) 2011.
  14. ↵
    1. Arlene O,
    2. Siefker-Radtke AMK,
    3. Corn PG,
    4. Matin SF,
    5. Barton Grossman H,
    6. Millikan RE,
    7. Dinney Colin PN
    : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DD-MVAC and bevacizumab in high-risk urothelial cancer: Results from a phase II trial at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol 30:2012 (suppl 5; abstr 261) 2011.
  15. ↵
    1. Twardowski P,
    2. Stadler WM,
    3. Frankel P,
    4. Lara PN,
    5. Ruel C,
    6. Chatta G,
    7. Heath E,
    8. Quinn DI,
    9. Gandara DR
    : Phase II study of Aflibercept (VEGF-Trap) in patients with recurrent or metastatic urothelial cancer, a California Cancer Consortium Trial. Urology 76: 923-926, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Doi T,
    2. Ohtsu A,
    3. Fuse N,
    4. Yoshino T,
    5. Tahara M,
    6. Shibayama K,
    7. Takubo T,
    8. Weinreich DM
    : Phase 1 study of trebananib (AMG 386), an angiogenesis targeting angiopoietin-1/2 antagonist, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 71: 227-235, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Mita AC,
    2. Takimoto CH,
    3. Mita M,
    4. Tolcher A,
    5. Sankhala K,
    6. Sarantopoulos J,
    7. Valdivieso M,
    8. Wood L,
    9. Rasmussen E,
    10. Sun YN,
    11. Zhong ZD,
    12. Bass MB,
    13. Le N,
    14. LoRusso P
    : Phase 1 study of AMG 386, a selective angiopoietin 1/2-neutralizing peptibody, in combination with chemotherapy in adults with advanced solid tumors. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 16: 3044-3056, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Sonpavde G,
    2. Jian W,
    3. Liu H,
    4. Wu MF,
    5. Shen SS,
    6. Lerner SP
    : Sunitinib malate is active against human urothelial carcinoma and enhances the activity of cisplatin in a preclinical model. Urologic oncology 2008.
  19. ↵
    1. Bellmunt J,
    2. Gonzalez-Larriba JL,
    3. Prior C,
    4. Maroto P,
    5. Carles J,
    6. Castellano D,
    7. Mellado B,
    8. Gallardo E,
    9. Perez-Gracia JL,
    10. Aguilar G,
    11. Villanueva X,
    12. Albanell J,
    13. Calvo A
    : Phase II study of sunitinib as first-line treatment of urothelial cancer patients ineligible to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy: baseline interleukin-8 and tumor contrast enhancement as potential predictive factors of activity. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 22: 2646-2653, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Gallagher D MM,
    2. Gerst S,
    3. et al
    : Final results of a phase II study of sunitinib in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 270 Abstract 5082.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. M. D. Galsky GS,
    2. Hellerstedt B. A.,
    3. McKenney S. A.,
    4. Hutson T. E.,
    5. Rauch M. A.,
    6. Wang Y.,
    7. Boehm K. A.,
    8. Asmar L.
    : Phase II study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and sunitinib in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). J Clin Oncol 282010.
  22. ↵
    1. Grivas PD,
    2. Daignault S,
    3. Tagawa ST,
    4. Nanus DM,
    5. Stadler WM,
    6. Dreicer R,
    7. Kohli M,
    8. Petrylak DP,
    9. Vaughn DJ,
    10. Bylow KA,
    11. Wong SG,
    12. Sottnik JL,
    13. Keller ET,
    14. Al-Hawary M,
    15. Smith DC,
    16. Hussain M
    : Double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial of maintenance sunitinib versus placebo after response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 120: 692-701, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Galsky MD,
    2. Hahn NM,
    3. Powles T,
    4. Hellerstedt BA,
    5. Lerner SP,
    6. Gardner TA,
    7. Yu M,
    8. O'Rourke M,
    9. Vogelzang NJ,
    10. Kocs D,
    11. McKenney SA,
    12. Melnyk AM Jr..,
    13. Hutson TE,
    14. Rauch M,
    15. Wang Y,
    16. Asmar L,
    17. Sonpavde G
    : Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and sunitinib for metastatic urothelial carcinoma and as preoperative therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clinical genitourinary cancer 11: 175-181, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Dreicer R,
    2. Li H,
    3. Stein M,
    4. DiPaola R,
    5. Eleff M,
    6. Roth BJ,
    7. Wilding G
    : Phase 2 trial of sorafenib in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Cancer 115: 4090-4095, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Sridhar SS,
    2. Winquist E,
    3. Eisen A,
    4. Hotte SJ,
    5. McWhirter E,
    6. Tannock IF,
    7. Mukherjee SD,
    8. Wang L,
    9. Blattler C,
    10. Wright JJ,
    11. Moore MJ
    : A phase II trial of sorafenib in first-line metastatic urothelial cancer: a study of the PMH Phase II Consortium. Investigational new drugs 29: 1045-1049, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Krege S,
    2. Rexer H,
    3. vom Dorp F,
    4. de Geeter P,
    5. Klotz T,
    6. Retz M,
    7. Heidenreich A,
    8. Kuhn M,
    9. Kamradt J,
    10. Feyerabend S,
    11. Wulfing C,
    12. Zastrow S,
    13. Albers P,
    14. Hakenberg O,
    15. Roigas J,
    16. Fenner M,
    17. Heinzer H,
    18. Schrader M
    : Prospective randomized double-blind multicentre phase II study comparing gemcitabine and cisplatin plus sorafenib chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin plus placebo in locally advanced and/or metastasized urothelial cancer: SUSE (AUO-AB 31/05). BJU international 113: 429-436, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Andrea Necchi NZ,
    2. Mariani Luigi,
    3. Schwartz Lawrence H.,
    4. Nicolai Nicola,
    5. Giannatempo Patrizia,
    6. Crippa Flavio,
    7. Morosi Carlo,
    8. Gianni Alessandro M.,
    9. De Braud Filippo G.,
    10. Salvioni Roberto
    : Biomarker analysis and final results of INT70/09 phase II proof-of-concept study of pazopanib (PZP) in refractory urothelial cancer (UC). J Clin Oncol 302012.
  28. ↵
    1. Pili RQ R,
    2. Flynn PJ,
    3. Picus J,
    4. Millward M,
    5. Ho WM,
    6. Pitot HC,
    7. Tan W,
    8. Erlichman C,
    9. Vaishampayan UN,
    10. Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY,
    11. Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN,
    12. Metro Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN,
    13. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO,
    14. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia,
    15. Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong,
    16. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL,
    17. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
    : MC0553: A phase II safety and efficacy study with the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. In: 2011 Genitourinary cancers symposium: Journal of clinical Oncology, 2011.
  29. ↵
    1. Gerullis H,
    2. Eimer C,
    3. Ecke TH,
    4. Georgas E,
    5. Arndt C,
    6. Otto T
    : Combined treatment with pazopanib and vinflunine in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma refractory after first-line therapy. Anti-cancer drugs 24: 422-425, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Choueiri TK,
    2. Ross RW,
    3. Jacobus S,
    4. Vaishampayan U,
    5. Yu EY,
    6. Quinn DI,
    7. Hahn NM,
    8. Hutson TE,
    9. Sonpavde G,
    10. Morrissey SC,
    11. Buckle GC,
    12. Kim WY,
    13. Petrylak DP,
    14. Ryan CW,
    15. Eisenberger MA,
    16. Mortazavi A,
    17. Bubley GJ,
    18. Taplin ME,
    19. Rosenberg JE,
    20. Kantoff PW
    : Double-blind, randomized trial of docetaxel plus vandetanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in platinum-pretreated metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30: 507-512, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Verdoorn BP,
    2. Kessler ER,
    3. Flaig TW
    : Targeted therapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Oncology 27: 219-226, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Chow NH,
    2. Liu HS,
    3. Lee EI,
    4. Chang CJ,
    5. Chan SH,
    6. Cheng HL,
    7. Tzai TS,
    8. Lin JS
    : Significance of urinary epidermal growth factor and its receptor expression in human bladder cancer. Anticancer research 17: 1293-1296, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Bellmunt J,
    2. Hussain M,
    3. Dinney CP
    : Novel approaches with targeted therapies in bladder cancer. Therapy of bladder cancer by blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor family. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 46 Suppl: S85-104, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Wong YN,
    2. Litwin S,
    3. Vaughn D,
    4. Cohen S,
    5. Plimack ER,
    6. Lee J,
    7. Song W,
    8. Dabrow M,
    9. Brody M,
    10. Tuttle H,
    11. Hudes G
    : Phase II trial of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with advanced urothelial tract carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 30: 3545-3551, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Grivas NA P,
    2. Siefker-Radtke AO,
    3. Daignault S,
    4. Puzanov I,
    5. MacVicar GR,
    6. Levine EG,
    7. Srinivas S,
    8. Twardowski P,
    9. Eisenberger MA,
    10. Quinn DI,
    11. Vaishampayan UN,
    12. Yu EY,
    13. Dawsey S,
    14. Day KC,
    15. Day ML,
    16. Smith DC,
    17. Hussain M
    : Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) with or without cetuximab (CET) in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). J Clin Oncol 30: 2012 (suppl; abstr 4506) 2012.
  36. ↵
    1. Shrader M,
    2. Pino MS,
    3. Brown G,
    4. Black P,
    5. Adam L,
    6. Bar-Eli M,
    7. Dinney CP,
    8. McConkey DJ
    : Molecular correlates of gefitinib responsiveness in human bladder cancer cells. Molecular cancer therapeutics 6: 277-285, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Dominguez-Escrig JL,
    2. Kelly JD,
    3. Neal DE,
    4. King SM,
    5. Davies BR
    : Evaluation of the therapeutic potential of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in preclinical models of bladder cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 10: 4874-4884, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Petrylak DP,
    2. Tangen CM,
    3. Van Veldhuizen PJ Jr..,
    4. Goodwin JW,
    5. Twardowski PW,
    6. Atkins JN,
    7. Kakhil SR,
    8. Lange MK,
    9. Mansukhani M,
    10. Crawford ED
    : Results of the Southwest Oncology Group phase II evaluation (study S0031) of ZD1839 for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. BJU international 105: 317-321, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Philips GK,
    2. Halabi S,
    3. Sanford BL,
    4. Bajorin D,
    5. Small EJ
    : A phase II trial of cisplatin (C), gemcitabine (G) and gefitinib for advanced urothelial tract carcinoma: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90102. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 2009.
  40. ↵
    1. Pruthi RS,
    2. Nielsen M,
    3. Heathcote S,
    4. Wallen EM,
    5. Rathmell WK,
    6. Godley P,
    7. Whang Y,
    8. Fielding J,
    9. Schultz H,
    10. Grigson G,
    11. Smith A,
    12. Kim W
    : A phase II trial of neoadjuvant erlotinib in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy: clinical and pathological results. BJU international 106: 349-354, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Jimenez RE,
    2. Hussain M,
    3. Bianco FJ Jr..,
    4. Vaishampayan U,
    5. Tabazcka P,
    6. Sakr WA,
    7. Pontes JE,
    8. Wood DP Jr..,
    9. Grignon DJ
    : Her-2/neu overexpression in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: prognostic significance and comparative analysis in primary and metastatic tumors. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 7: 2440-2447, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Hussain MH,
    2. MacVicar GR,
    3. Petrylak DP,
    4. Dunn RL,
    5. Vaishampayan U,
    6. Lara PN Jr..,
    7. Chatta GS,
    8. Nanus DM,
    9. Glode LM,
    10. Trump DL,
    11. Chen H,
    12. Smith DC
    : Trastuzumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2/neu-positive urothelial carcinoma: results of a multicenter phase II National Cancer Institute trial. J Clin Oncol 25: 2218-2224, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. McHugh LA,
    2. Sayan AE,
    3. Mejlvang J,
    4. Griffiths TR,
    5. Sun Y,
    6. Manson MM,
    7. Tulchinsky E,
    8. Mellon JK,
    9. Kriajevska M
    : Lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of ErbB-1/-2 receptors, enhances effects of combination chemotherapy in bladder cancer cells. International journal of oncology 34: 1155-1163, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Wulfing C,
    2. Machiels JP,
    3. Richel DJ,
    4. Grimm MO,
    5. Treiber U,
    6. De Groot MR,
    7. Beuzeboc P,
    8. Parikh R,
    9. Petavy F,
    10. El-Hariry IA
    : A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase 2 study of lapatinib as the second-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma. Cancer 115: 2881-2890, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Galsky MD,
    2. Von Hoff DD,
    3. Neubauer M,
    4. Anderson T,
    5. Fleming M,
    6. Nagarwala Y,
    7. Mahoney JM,
    8. Midwinter D,
    9. Vocila L,
    10. Zaks TZ
    : Target-specific, histology-independent, randomized discontinuation study of lapatinib in patients with HER2-amplified solid tumors. Investigational new drugs 30: 695-701, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Culine S,
    2. Sellam Z,
    3. Bouaita L,
    4. Assaf E,
    5. Delbaldo C,
    6. Verlinde-Carvalho M,
    7. Pouessel D
    : Combining paclitaxel and lapatinib as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma: a case series. Anticancer research 32: 3949-3952, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Messing E,
    2. Gee JR,
    3. Saltzstein DR,
    4. Kim K,
    5. diSant'Agnese A,
    6. Kolesar J,
    7. Harris L,
    8. Faerber A,
    9. Havighurst T,
    10. Young JM,
    11. Efros M,
    12. Getzenberg RH,
    13. Wheeler MA,
    14. Tangrea J,
    15. Parnes H,
    16. House M,
    17. Busby JE,
    18. Hohl R,
    19. Bailey H
    : A phase 2 cancer chemoprevention biomarker trial of isoflavone G-2535 (genistein) in presurgical bladder cancer patients. Cancer prevention research 5: 621-630, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Tomlinson DC,
    2. Baldo O,
    3. Harnden P,
    4. Knowles MA
    : FGFR3 protein expression and its relationship to mutation status and prognostic variables in bladder cancer. The Journal of pathology 213: 91-98, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Lamont FR,
    2. Tomlinson DC,
    3. Cooper PA,
    4. Shnyder SD,
    5. Chester JD,
    6. Knowles MA
    : Small molecule FGF receptor inhibitors block FGFR-dependent urothelial carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo. British journal of cancer 104: 75-82, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Miyake M,
    2. Ishii M,
    3. Koyama N,
    4. Kawashima K,
    5. Kodama T,
    6. Anai S,
    7. Fujimoto K,
    8. Hirao Y,
    9. Sugano K
    : 1-tert-butyl-3-[6-(3,5-dimethoxy-phenyl)-2-(4-diethylamino-butylamino)-pyrido[2,3 - d]pyrimidin-7-yl]-urea (PD173074), a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 (FGFR3), inhibits cell proliferation of bladder cancer carrying the FGFR3 gene mutation along with up-regulation of p27/Kip1 and G1/G0 arrest. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 332: 795-802, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Williams SV,
    2. Hurst CD,
    3. Knowles MA
    : Oncogenic FGFR3 gene fusions in bladder cancer. Human molecular genetics 22: 795-803, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Gozgit JM,
    2. Wong MJ,
    3. Moran L,
    4. Wardwell S,
    5. Mohemmad QK,
    6. Narasimhan NI,
    7. Shakespeare WC,
    8. Wang F,
    9. Clackson T,
    10. Rivera VM
    : Ponatinib (AP24534), a multitargeted pan-FGFR inhibitor with activity in multiple FGFR-amplified or mutated cancer models. Molecular cancer therapeutics 11: 690-699, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Cheng T,
    2. Roth B,
    3. Choi W,
    4. Black PC,
    5. Dinney C,
    6. McConkey DJ
    : Fibroblast growth factor receptors-1 and -3 play distinct roles in the regulation of bladder cancer growth and metastasis: implications for therapeutic targeting. PloS one 8: e57284, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. di Martino E,
    2. Tomlinson DC,
    3. Knowles MA
    : A Decade of FGF Receptor Research in Bladder Cancer: Past, Present and Future Challenges. Advances in urology 2012: 429213, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Ching CB,
    2. Hansel DE
    : Expanding therapeutic targets in bladder cancer: the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 90: 1406-1414, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Chiong E,
    2. Lee IL,
    3. Dadbin A,
    4. Sabichi AL,
    5. Harris L,
    6. Urbauer D,
    7. McConkey DJ,
    8. Dickstein RJ,
    9. Cheng T,
    10. Grossman HB
    : Effects of mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) on bladder cancer cells. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17: 2863-2873, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Vasconcelos-Nobrega C,
    2. Pinto-Leite R,
    3. Arantes-Rodrigues R,
    4. Ferreira R,
    5. Brochado P,
    6. Cardoso ML,
    7. Palmeira C,
    8. Salvador A,
    9. Guedes-Teixeira CI,
    10. Colaco A,
    11. Palomino LF,
    12. Lopes C,
    13. Santos L,
    14. Oliveira PA
    : In vivo and in vitro effects of RAD001 on bladder cancer. Urologic oncology 31: 1212-1221, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Milowsky MI,
    2. Iyer G,
    3. Regazzi AM,
    4. Al-Ahmadie H,
    5. Gerst SR,
    6. Ostrovnaya I,
    7. Gellert LL,
    8. Kaplan R,
    9. Garcia-Grossman IR,
    10. Pendse D,
    11. Balar AV,
    12. Flaherty AM,
    13. Trout A,
    14. Solit DB,
    15. Bajorin DF
    : Phase II study of everolimus in metastatic urothelial cancer. BJU international 112: 462-470, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Seront E,
    2. Rottey S,
    3. Sautois B,
    4. Kerger J,
    5. D'Hondt LA,
    6. Verschaeve V,
    7. Canon JL,
    8. Dopchie C,
    9. Vandenbulcke JM,
    10. Whenham N,
    11. Goeminne JC,
    12. Clausse M,
    13. Verhoeven D,
    14. Glorieux P,
    15. Branders S,
    16. Dupont P,
    17. Schoonjans J,
    18. Feron O,
    19. Machiels JP
    : Phase II study of everolimus in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract: clinical activity, molecular response, and biomarkers. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 23: 2663-2670, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Pinto-Leite R,
    2. Arantes-Rodrigues R,
    3. Palmeira C,
    4. Colaco B,
    5. Lopes C,
    6. Colaco A,
    7. Costa C,
    8. da Silva VM,
    9. Oliveira P,
    10. Santos L
    : Everolimus combined with cisplatin has a potential role in treatment of urothelial bladder cancer. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie 67: 116-121, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. De Santis M,
    2. Bellmunt J,
    3. Mead G,
    4. Kerst JM,
    5. Leahy M,
    6. Maroto P,
    7. Gil T,
    8. Marreaud S,
    9. Daugaard G,
    10. Skoneczna I,
    11. Collette S,
    12. Lorent J,
    13. de Wit R,
    14. Sylvester R
    : Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986. J Clin Oncol 30: 191-199, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Pinto-Leite R,
    2. Arantes-Rodrigues R,
    3. Ferreira R,
    4. Palmeira C,
    5. Colaco A,
    6. Moreira da Silva V,
    7. Oliveira P,
    8. Lara Santos L
    : Temsirolimus improves cytotoxic efficacy of cisplatin and gemcitabine against urinary bladder cancer cell lines. Urologic oncology 32: 41 e11-22, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Gerullis H,
    2. Eimer C,
    3. Ecke TH,
    4. Georgas E,
    5. Freitas C,
    6. Kastenholz S,
    7. Arndt C,
    8. Heusch C,
    9. Otto T
    : A phase II trial of temsirolimus in second-line metastatic urothelial cancer. Medical oncology 29: 2870-2876, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Babjuk M,
    2. Oosterlinck W,
    3. Sylvester R,
    4. Kaasinen E,
    5. Bohle A,
    6. Palou-Redorta J,
    7. Roupret M,
    8. European Association of U
    : EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, the 2011 update. European urology 59: 997-1008, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Houghton BB,
    2. Chalasani V,
    3. Hayne D,
    4. Grimison P,
    5. Brown CS,
    6. Patel MI,
    7. Davis ID,
    8. Stockler MR
    : Intravesical chemotherapy plus bacille Calmette-Guerin in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BJU international 111: 977-983, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Bevers RF,
    2. Kurth KH,
    3. Schamhart DH
    : Role of urothelial cells in BCG immunotherapy for superficial bladder cancer. British journal of cancer 91: 607-612, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Lockyer CR,
    2. Gillatt DA
    : BCG immunotherapy for superficial bladder cancer. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 94: 119-123, 2001.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Ayari C,
    2. Bergeron A,
    3. LaRue H,
    4. Menard C,
    5. Fradet Y
    : Toll-like receptors in normal and malignant human bladders. The Journal of urology 185: 1915-1921, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. LaRue H,
    2. Ayari C,
    3. Bergeron A,
    4. Fradet Y
    : Toll-like receptors in urothelial cells--targets for cancer immunotherapy. Nature reviews Urology 10: 537-545, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Mendez-Samperio P,
    2. Belmont L,
    3. Miranda E
    : Mycobacterium bovis BCG Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 cooperation increases the innate epithelial immune response. Archives of medical research 39: 33-39, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Miyazaki J,
    2. Kawai K,
    3. Oikawa T,
    4. Johraku A,
    5. Hattori K,
    6. Shimazui T,
    7. Akaza H
    : Uroepithelial cells can directly respond to Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin through Toll-like receptor signalling. BJU international 97: 860-864, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Falke J,
    2. Lammers RJ,
    3. Arentsen HC,
    4. Ravic M,
    5. Pozzi R,
    6. Cornel EB,
    7. Vergunst H,
    8. de Reijke TM,
    9. Witjes JA
    : Results of a phase 1 dose escalation study of intravesical TMX-101 in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. The Journal of urology 189: 2077-2082, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Smith EB,
    2. Schwartz M,
    3. Kawamoto H,
    4. You X,
    5. Hwang D,
    6. Liu H,
    7. Scherr DS
    : Antitumor effects of imidazoquinolines in urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. The Journal of urology 177: 2347-2351, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Filion MC,
    2. Phillips NC
    : Therapeutic potential of mycobacterial cell wall-DNA complexes. Expert opinion on investigational drugs 10: 2157-2165, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Morales A
    : Evolution of intravesical immunotherapy for bladder cancer: mycobacterial cell wall preparation as a promising agent. Expert opinion on investigational drugs 17: 1067-1073, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Atkins H,
    2. Davies BR,
    3. Kirby JA,
    4. Kelly JD
    : Polarisation of a T-helper cell immune response by activation of dendritic cells with CpG-containing oligonucleotides: a potential therapeutic regime for bladder cancer immunotherapy. British journal of cancer 89: 2312-2319, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hegele A,
    2. Dalpke A,
    3. Barth P,
    4. Varga Z,
    5. Heeg K,
    6. Hofmann R,
    7. Olbert P
    : Antineoplastic effect of immunostimulatory DNA (CpG-ODN) in a murine C57-BL6/MB-49 transitional cell carcinoma model. Anticancer research 24: 2225-2230, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ninalga C,
    2. Loskog A,
    3. Klevenfeldt M,
    4. Essand M,
    5. Totterman TH
    : CpG oligonucleotide therapy cures subcutaneous and orthotopic tumors and evokes protective immunity in murine bladder cancer. Journal of immunotherapy 28: 20-27, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Olbert PJ,
    2. Schrader AJ,
    3. Simon C,
    4. Dalpke A,
    5. Barth P,
    6. Hofmann R,
    7. Hegele A
    : In vitro and in vivo effects of CpG-Oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-ODN) on murine transitional cell carcinoma and on the native murine urinary bladder wall. Anticancer research 29: 2067-2076, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Cho YJ,
    2. Ahn BY,
    3. Lee NG,
    4. Lee DH,
    5. Kim DS
    : A combination of E. coli DNA fragments and modified lipopolysaccharides as a cancer immunotherapy. Vaccine 24: 5862-5871, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. de Bono JS,
    2. Dalgleish AG,
    3. Carmichael J,
    4. Diffley J,
    5. Lofts FJ,
    6. Fyffe D,
    7. Ellard S,
    8. Gordon RJ,
    9. Brindley CJ,
    10. Evans TR
    : Phase I study of ONO-4007, a synthetic analogue of the lipid A moiety of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 6: 397-405, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Callahan MK,
    2. Wolchok JD,
    3. Allison JP
    : Anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy: immune monitoring during clinical development of a novel immunotherapy. Seminars in oncology 37: 473-484, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Carthon BC,
    2. Wolchok JD,
    3. Yuan J,
    4. Kamat A,
    5. Ng Tang DS,
    6. Sun J,
    7. Ku G,
    8. Troncoso P,
    9. Logothetis CJ,
    10. Allison JP,
    11. Sharma P
    : Preoperative CTLA-4 blockade: tolerability and immune monitoring in the setting of a presurgical clinical trial. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 16: 2861-2871, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Morse MA,
    2. Bradley DA,
    3. Keler T,
    4. Laliberte RJ,
    5. Green JA,
    6. Davis TA,
    7. Inman BA
    : CDX-1307: a novel vaccine under study as treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Expert review of vaccines 10: 733-742, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Morse MA,
    2. Chapman R,
    3. Powderly J,
    4. Blackwell K,
    5. Keler T,
    6. Green J,
    7. Riggs R,
    8. He LZ,
    9. Ramakrishna V,
    10. Vitale L,
    11. Zhao B,
    12. Butler SA,
    13. Hobeika A,
    14. Osada T,
    15. Davis T,
    16. Clay T,
    17. Lyerly HK
    : Phase I study utilizing a novel antigen-presenting cell-targeted vaccine with Toll-like receptor stimulation to induce immunity to self-antigens in cancer patients. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17: 4844-4853, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Kowalski M,
    2. Guindon J,
    3. Brazas L,
    4. Moore C,
    5. Entwistle J,
    6. Cizeau J,
    7. Jewett MA,
    8. MacDonald GC
    : A phase II study of oportuzumab monatox: an immunotoxin therapy for patients with noninvasive urothelial carcinoma in situ previously treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin. The Journal of urology 188: 1712-1718, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Levitt JM,
    2. Yamashita H,
    3. Jian W,
    4. Lerner SP,
    5. Sonpavde G
    : Dasatinib is preclinically active against Src-overexpressing human transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium with activated Src signaling. Molecular cancer therapeutics 9: 1128-1135, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Cecchi F,
    2. Rabe DC,
    3. Bottaro DP
    : Targeting the HGF/Met signalling pathway in cancer. European journal of cancer 46: 1260-1270, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Metalli D,
    2. Lovat F,
    3. Tripodi F,
    4. Genua M,
    5. Xu SQ,
    6. Spinelli M,
    7. Alberghina L,
    8. Vanoni M,
    9. Baffa R,
    10. Gomella LG,
    11. Iozzo RV,
    12. Morrione A
    : The insulin-like growth factor receptor I promotes motility and invasion of bladder cancer cells through Akt- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent activation of paxillin. The American journal of pathology 176: 2997-3006, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Iozzo RV,
    2. Buraschi S,
    3. Genua M,
    4. Xu SQ,
    5. Solomides CC,
    6. Peiper SC,
    7. Gomella LG,
    8. Owens RC,
    9. Morrione A
    : Decorin antagonizes IGF receptor I (IGF-IR) function by interfering with IGF-IR activity and attenuating downstream signaling. The Journal of biological chemistry 286: 34712-34721, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. ↵
    1. Nyman DW,
    2. Campbell KJ,
    3. Hersh E,
    4. Long K,
    5. Richardson K,
    6. Trieu V,
    7. Desai N,
    8. Hawkins MJ,
    9. Von Hoff DD
    : Phase I and pharmacokinetics trial of ABI-007, a novel nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 23: 7785-7793, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. Ko YJ,
    2. Canil CM,
    3. Mukherjee SD,
    4. Winquist E,
    5. Elser C,
    6. Eisen A,
    7. Reaume MN,
    8. Zhang L,
    9. Sridhar SS
    : Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel for second-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single group, multicentre, phase 2 study. The Lancet Oncology 14: 769-776, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Cortes J,
    2. Montero AJ,
    3. Gluck S
    : Eribulin mesylate, a novel microtubule inhibitor in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer treatment reviews 38: 143-151, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Quinn DI,
    2. Aparicio A,
    3. Tsao-Wei DD,
    4. Groshen SG,
    5. Dorff TB,
    6. Synold TW,
    7. Stadler WM,
    8. Gandara DR,
    9. Lara P Jr..,
    10. Newman EM,
    11. California Cancer Consortium
    : Phase II study of eribulin (E7389) in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial cancer (UC)--Final report: A California Cancer Consortium-led NCI/CTEP-sponsored trial. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 28: 4539, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  91. ↵
    1. Rosenberg JE,
    2. Halabi S,
    3. Sanford BL,
    4. Himelstein AL,
    5. Atkins JN,
    6. Hohl RJ,
    7. Millard F,
    8. Bajorin DF,
    9. Small EJ
    : Phase II study of bortezomib in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial tract transitional cell carcinoma: CALGB 90207. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 19: 946-950, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  92. ↵
    1. Stadler W,
    2. Vaughn D,
    3. Sonpavde G,
    4. Vogelzang N,
    5. Tagawa S,
    6. Petrylak D,
    7. Rosen P,
    8. Lin C,
    9. Mahoney J,
    10. Modi S
    : Clinical outcome of single agent volasertib (BI 6727) as second-line treatment of patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). In: ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, p. 4567, 2011.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 9
September 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel Molecular Targets for the Therapy of Urothelial Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Novel Molecular Targets for the Therapy of Urothelial Cancer
BAGI R.P. JANA, YAN ZHOU
Anticancer Research Sep 2015, 35 (9) 4557-4567;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Novel Molecular Targets for the Therapy of Urothelial Cancer
BAGI R.P. JANA, YAN ZHOU
Anticancer Research Sep 2015, 35 (9) 4557-4567;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Targeting Angiogenesis
    • EGFR- and HER2-targeting Agents
    • Targeting Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor
    • Targeting PI3K– AKT-mTOR Pathway
    • Immunomodulators
    • Other Novel Agents
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • A New Prognostic Instrument Specifically Designed for Patients Irradiated for Recurrent Carcinoma of the Bladder
  • Simplified Comorbidity Score and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score Predicts Survival in Patients Receiving Organ-preserving Treatment for Bladder Cancer
  • A Survival Score for Patients Assigned to Palliative Radiotherapy for Metastatic Bladder Cancer
  • Chemoradiation Including Paclitaxel for Locally Recurrent Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in Elderly Patients
  • Concurrent Chemotherapy Improves the Overall Survival of Patients Irradiated for Locally Recurrent Bladder Cancer
  • Predicting Survival After Irradiation of Metastases from Transitional Carcinoma of the Bladder
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrated Treatment of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: A Descriptive Review of the State of the Art
  • Cytokine-based Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities for IL-10
  • Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy in Complementary Oncology: A Systematic Review
Show more Reviews

Keywords

  • urothelial cancer
  • transitional cell carcinoma
  • novel molecular targets
  • targeted therapy
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire