Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

MMP9, Cyclin D1 and β-Catenin Are Useful Markers of p16-positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Therapeutic EGFR Inhibition In Vitro

CLAUDIA UMBREIT, PHILIPP ERBEN, ANNE FABER, RALF-DIETER HOFHEINZ, CHRISTOPH ADERHOLD, CHRISTEL WEISS, KARL HOERMANN, ANGELA WENZEL and JOHANNES DAVID SCHULTZ
Anticancer Research July 2015, 35 (7) 3801-3810;
CLAUDIA UMBREIT
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: claudia.umbreit@web.de
PHILIPP ERBEN
2Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNE FABER
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RALF-DIETER HOFHEINZ
3Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTOPH ADERHOLD
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTEL WEISS
4Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KARL HOERMANN
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANGELA WENZEL
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOHANNES DAVID SCHULTZ
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: In the United States 53,640 new cases of head and neck cancer were estimated in 2013. Over 95% of these cases were evaluated as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). At present, smoking, drinking alcohol, chewing betel and infection with high-risk types of human papilloma virus (HPV) are classified as risk factors of oropharyngeal squamous cancer cell carcinoma (OPSCC). It could be suggested that patients with HPV-positive OPSCC have a better response to chemoradiotherapy than patients without. In many studies, there was observed an inverse correlation between epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and HPV status in p16-positive SCC. Therefore, it is of great clinical interest to specify the phenotype of cancer cells in order to further individualize treatment modalities. The aim of the study was to investigate the expression pattern of specific markers in p16-positive SCC cells after stimulation with lapatinib and gefitinib. Materials and Methods: We incubated p16-positive CERV196 cells with lapatinib and gefitinib (2 μg/ml) and after 5, 24 and 96 h determined E-cadherin, vimentin, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9), cyclin D1 and β-catenin by immunocytochemistry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: We found an increase of E-cadherin and a decrease of vimentin in unstimulated cells. We detected an alteration of expression of vimentin and E-cadherin level after treatment with lapatinib and gefitinib. We demonstrated a statistically significant lapatinib- and gefitinib-induced repression of cyclin D1, MMP9 and β-catenin in CERV196 cells dependent on incubation time. Conclusion: Cyclin D1 and MMP9 expression profiles may represent an early measure of sensitivity and level of response to lapatinib and gefitinib. The presented cell culture model is, therefore, well-suited for further study of epigenetic regulation of molecular targeted-therapy by EGFR inhibition and prevention of mesenchymal transition in p16-positive SCC cells.

  • gefitinib
  • lapatinib
  • MMP9
  • cyclin D1
  • β-catenin
  • epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)
  • head and neck squamous cancer cells (HNSCC)
  • epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)
  • mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET)
  • human papillomavirus (HPV)

The main risk factors for the development of head and neck squamous cancer cells (HNSCC) are alcohol and tobacco consumption. Clinical and pathological evidence suggests that viral oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is another crucial etiological factor (1). The epidemiological, genetic, molecular and clinical profile of HPV-associated HNSCC cells seems to differ from that of tobacco- and alcohol-induced HNSCC (non-HPV). HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma cells are characterized by being found in immunodeficient or immunosuppressed patients, those with a young age of HNSCC onset, those with a higher number of intimate partners with a history of genital warts and a strong association with sexual behavior (2). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, is normally expressed at low levels on the surface of most normal cells. In a variety of tissues, the main function of EGFR is to induce cell growth, proliferation, survival and de-differentiation. EGFR is also a member of the human epidermal growth factor (HER) family, and is overexpressed in more than 90% of HNSCCs, a high level of EGFR being associated with a worse clinical outcome (3). Aberrant expression of type I receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGFR (or c-ERBB1 to c-ERBB4) is frequently associated with the progression and genesis of human cancer (4).

Concurrent chemoradiation has been associated with improvement in locoregional control and organ preservation but at the cost of significant acute and chronic toxicity. HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCC (OPSCC) responds much better to treatment than HPV-negative OPSCC. However, many patients with HPV-positive OPSCC may not need the intensive chemoradiotherapy protocol, which is associated with serious side-effects. It may, thus, be concluded that HPV-preventative and individualized therapy are essential in treatment of this type of tumor (5). Biological agents targeting EGFR as a potential modality in combination with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy are currently under evaluation in clinical trials (6, 7). The development of monoclonal antibodies or agents that inhibit the receptor or the receptor tyrosine kinase are of high clinical interest.

Gefitinib (Iressa®; AstraZeneca) is a monoclonal antibody, which inhibits the ERBB1 tyrosine kinase and has shown anti-tumorous activity against small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer (8, 9). Altered E-cadherin/β-catenin expression in non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations was associated with poor response to EGFR tyrosine kinase (10). Lapatinib is a novel synthetic small-molecule inhibitor of epithelial growth factor-1 (EGF1) and human ERBB2 (HER2) tyrosine kinases. It is used in the form of lapatinib ditosylate (Tyverb®; GlaxoSmithKline), which showed high cell potency. It is an anti-EGFR-targeted treatment for breast tumors and other types of solid cancer (8). Fumagalli and colleagues demonstrated that lapatinib efficacy is restricted to the HPV-positive HNSCC cell lines (11).

A crucial process for the development of a metastatic carcinoma cell phenotype and the potential for invasion is epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), this process is defined by a decrease of epithelial-specific adhesion proteins (e.g. tight and adherens junction proteins such as cytokeratin, E-cadherin, desmoplakin, and claudin). Furthermore EMT, which can be activated by various growth factors, such as EGF and transforming growth factor beta 1, induces expression of mesenchymal proteins, such as N-cadherin, fibronectin and vimentin. It also induces the development of migratory attributes and changes in morphology (e.g. cell scattering) (12-16). Other EMT regulators that seem to control tumorigenesis are matrix metalloproteinases (e.g. MMP3 and MMP9) (17). MMPs as gelatinases play an important role in degrading the extracellular matrix (ECM). These enzymes are also associated with morphogenesis, organization, bone development, wound healing and cancer development (18-21). MMPs play a key role in tumor cell invasion of the basement membrane and stroma, blood vessel penetration, metastasis and tumor promotion (22). Autocrine or paracrine signaling through EGFR potentiates the invasive potential of HNSCC via selective up-regulation and activation of MMP9 (23).

Recently, in p16-positive, vimentin-down-regulated and E-cadherin-up-regulated SCC cells we showed incomplete EMT, with a significant up-regulation of β-catenin and cell scattering, with only a minor increase in expression of vimentin and decrease in E-cadherin expression, particularly after prolonged incubation with EGF (24). Cell proliferation and differentiation are regulated by the WNT (wingless gene and INT-1 gene) /β-catenin signaling pathway. The armadillo protein β-catenin is the central denominator of WNT signaling. However, during EMT, the interaction between β-catenin and E-cadherin are disconnected and β-catenin is translocated to the nucleus or also degraded (25). In other studies, in vulvar cancer, it was demonstrated that an alteration of E-cadherin and β-catenin expression characterizes the metastatic development of epithelial tumors, which occurs at different points in time depending on the patient's HPV status. HPV-related tumors are associated with better prognosis and outcome and do not progress through EMT characteristics (26). Cells can also undergo the reverse process, mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), to continue their differentiation. These dynamic EMT and MET events highlight the great flexibility of differentiated cells during morphogenesis and carcinogenesis (27). Most metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma cells are able to change from the differentiation and morphology of the primary tumor and exhibit organized epithelial structures, despite the straightforward EMT-associated alteration in the phenotype at the invasive front. This phenomenon reflects re-differentiation in the metastases (28, 29).

The cell-cycle control protein cyclin D1 promotes control over G1 and S phase transition, which alters cell proliferation rates. Overexpression of cyclin D1 leads to shortening of the G1 phase resulting in an abnormally high cell proliferation (30). An increased level of cyclin D1 expression has been reported in a number of malignancies including esophageal, ovarian, breast, uterine, colon, lung, prostate, lymphoma, as well as head and neck cancer. However, in vivo and in vitro experiments demonstrated a correlation between cyclin D1 up-regulation and tumor growth, lymphangiogenesis and distant metastasis (31). It is suggested that HPV-positive SCC cells are associated with repression of cyclin D1 expression (32). In contrast to these results, in head and neck cancer not typically related to HPV, cyclin D1 up-regulation has been associated with poor outcome (33, 34). However, cyclin D1 might also be a potential prognostic factor to predict worse survival and outcome in cancer.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression pattern of vimentin, E-cadherin, MMP9 while adding of β-catenin and cyclin D1 quantitatively and qualitatively in HPV-positive SCC cells before and after stimulation with lapatinib and gefitinib in order to evaluate the outcome after different kinds of EGFR inhibition, and determine the alteration of potential prognostic markers, especially MMP9 and cyclin D1, after treatment with lapatinib and gefitinib in HPV-associated SCC cells in vitro.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Sequence of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers used in the mRNA expression analysis.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and culture. The p16-positive SCC cell line CERV196 (CLS, Eppelheim, Germany) originated from a poorly-differentiated xenotransplanted cervical carcinoma MRI-H-196. Cell culture was carried-out at 37°C in a fully humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 using Dulbecco's modified minimum essential medium (DMEM; Fisher Scientific Co., Pittsburgh, PA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and antibiotics (Life Technologies Inc., Gainthersburg, MD, USA). For immunocytochemistry, 1×104 cells per well were seeded in 8-well cell culture slides (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). Lapatinib (Tyverb®; GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co, Heidelberg, Germany) and gefitinib (Iressa®; AstraZeneca, Wedel, Germany) were stored at 4°C and dissolved in 0.5% FCS/DMEM at the time of application. When sub-confluent, cells were starved using 0% FCS/DMEM for 5 h and then incubated for 5, 24 and 96 h with lapatinib (2 μg/ml) or gefitinib (2 μg/ml) in 0.5% FCS/DMEM. Treatment with lapatinib (2 μg/ml) or gefitinib (2 μg/ml) was repeated every 24 h. Selection of the different drug concentrations and durations were defined after performing the alamarBlue (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) cell proliferation assay. After incubation, cells were centrifuged and the supernatants were collected together in sterile tubes and stored at −20°C until further analysis.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Concentrations of E-cadherin (DuoSet mouse antihuman E-cadherin; R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany), vimentin (Path Scan® total vimentin, sandwich ELISA kit, mouse monoclonal antibody-coated wells; Cell Signaling, Boston, MA, USA), MMP9 (DuoSet recombinant mouse, DY911; R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK), cyclin D1 (Path Scan® total cyclin D1 sandwich ELISA kit, human antibody; Cell Signaling) and β-catenin (DuoSet mouse antihuman β-catenin; R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany) in the supernatants of the cell cultures and untreated cell cultures were determined by the ELISA technique (DMP2F0; R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany). The system utilized a solid-phase monoclonal antibody and enzyme-linked polyclonal antibodies against E-cadherin, vimentin, MMP9, cyclin D1 and β-catenin. The specificity of antihuman antibodies used in the ELISA kit (DuoSet IC ELISA; R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany) was examined by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by western blotting. According to the manufacturer's instructions, each analyte was measured in 100 μl of supernatant. All analyses and calibrations were performed in triplicate. The optical density was detected using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 540 nm. Concentrations of E-cadherin, MMP9, and β-catenin are reported as pg/ml. The coucentration of vimentin is given as μg/ml and of cyclin D1 in absorbance of 450 nm.

Immunocytochemistry. Immunocytochemical analysis was performed using an antibody directed against E-cadherin (ab 1416, monoclonal mouse antibody, 1:50; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), vimentin (M 0725, monoclonal mouse antibody, 1:50, Fa; Dako, Agilent Technologies, Glostrup, Denmark), MMP9 (ab 38898, polyclonal rabbit anti-human antibody, 1:100; Abcam), cyclin D1 (ab 6152, monoclonal mouse antibody, 1:100; Abcam) and β-catenin (monoclonal rabbit antibody, 1:200; Abcam). Immunostaining was performed using the streptavidin-biotin complex immunostaining method. Before performing immunocytochemistry, the SCC cells were cultured in 8-well chambers overnight. While growing to confluency, cells were exposed to different concentrations of lapatinib or gefitinib for different incubation periods (0, 5, 24, 96 h). Subsequently, they underwent fixation with acetone and alcohol (2:1) and were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Buffer kit; Dako, Hamburg, Germany). The following steps were executed by Dako TechMate 500 (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) automated staining system: Cells were incubated with primary antibody solution for 30 min at room temperature using a working solution of antibody to cells of 1:300. The slides were washed three times with PBS for 5 min each time (Buffer kit; Dako, Hamburg, Germany). Immunoreaction was shown with the Dako ChemMate Detection kit according to the guidelines of the manufacturer (APAAP, mouse, no. K5000; Dako, Hamburg, Germany). Cells were incubated in sheep serum. Immunoreaction was demonstrated with the monoclonal antibodies previously described. Incubation was followed by the addition of a specific biotinylated secondary antibody and streptavidin-biotin horseradish peroxidase complex (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany). To perform the peroxidase reaction, aminoethylcarbazol as chromogen was used. Before washing the cells several times, endogenous peroxidase was blocked using Dako REAL™ Levamisole (Bottle G, APAAP, mouse, no. K5000; Dako Hamburg, Germany). For the negative controls, all reagents except the primary antibody were used. The sections underwent counterstaining with Harris hematoxylin for 30 s, followed by dehydration in graded ethanol and coverslipping. The rates of E-cadherin, vimentin, MMP9, cyclin D1 and β-catenin expression demonstrated immunohistochemically were determined. The immunopositivity of the cells was analyzed using an Axio Visio Scan Scope scanning system (microscope Axiophot, and Axio Visio Scan Scope 4.8.2 software; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The staining intensity was evaluated as follows: strong reactivity, >80% of the cells stained positively; moderate reactivity, 50-80% of the cells stained positively); and no positive cells.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Negative control, demonstration of growth behaviour and declining immunohistochemical reactivity for E-cadherin (a-c), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) (d-f), cyclin D1 (g-i) and β-catenin (j-l) in CERV196 cells after incubation with lapatinib (2 μg/ml) for 24 and 96 h.

cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Expression of glycerinaldehyd 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), E-cadherin, vimentin, cyclin D1 and β-catenin mRNA was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. Total RNA was isolated with the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer‘s instructions and stored at −80°C. An aliquot of 0.5 μg total RNA was treated with 1 unit DNAse (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) for 30 min at 37°C. Reverse transcription of RNA (0.5 μg) was performed with oligo (dT) 18-26 primer and 200 units of SUPERSCRIPT II (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 24 units of Ribo Lock™ RNAse inhibitors (Fermentas) for 1 h at 42°C. The cDNA was used for PCR analysis. Primer sequences and annealing temperature are presented in Table I. The QuantiTect/primer assays were purchased from QIAGEN GmbH (Hilden, Germany). cDNAs were amplified with Taq Man fast advanced SYBR® Green QRT-PCR Master Mix (Stratagene-Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The following cycle profile was used: one cycle at 95°C for 2 s followed by 50 cycles at 95°C for 3 s, and 60°C for 30 s. Amplification was performed using the M×3005P™ QPCR System (Stratagene-Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). For relative quantification, a standard curve was generated for every individual run. The data were analyzed using the relative standard curve method. To check the specificity of the amplification products, the dissociation-curve method was used. Data were analyzed using M×3005P™ analysis software (Stratagene-Agilent Technologies). The threshold method was used for quantification of the mRNA level. Cycle threshold change (ΔCT) values were calculated based on the internal standard GAPDH (35). Results are expressed as percentages of the non-stimulated controls (2−ΔΔCt data analysis method). Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed in cooperation with Professor Dr. C. Weiss, Institute of Biomathematics, Faculty of Medicine, Mannheim, Germany. All data were subjected to the means procedure. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. The differences ELISA in E-cadherin, vimentin, MMP9, and cyclin D1 expression between test cultures and control cultures were analyzed using Dunnett‘s test and the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of varience by ranks, which are part of the general linear model procedures.

Results

Immunocytochemistry of E-cadherin, vimentin, MMP9, cyclin D1 and β-catenin in CERV196. We established several cell lines in our laboratory before starting stimulation. The cells were assessed for morphological changes, and evaluated for the expression of key EMT markers. The p16-positive SCC cell line CERV196 had the most pronounced epithelial phenotype (scattering−, E-cadherin+, vimentin−). Immunocytochemical studies showed that in negative controls, CERV196 cells expressed a moderate level of membranous β-catenin and a low level of nuclear MMP9. A strong level of membranous and a low level of nuclear E-cadherin was detected in control CERV196 cells. No positivity for vimentin and cyclin D1 was detected in the control (Figure 1 and Table II). After incubation with gefitinib, we detected down-regulation of E-cadherin, particularly after 96 h of gefitinib treatment. Less expression of E-cadherin was also found after 96 h of lapatinib treatment. Gefitinib induced a decrease of MMP9, particularly after 24 and 96 h incubation with gefitinib. After 24 h incubation with lapatinib, there were quantitative differences in MMP9 expression in p16-positive CERV196 cells (Figure 1 d-f). No expression of cyclin D1 and vimentin after treatment with lapatinib and gefitinib was apparent. In contrast to this finding, in cells treated for 24 h with lapatinib, there was an increase of membranous of β-catenin and its nuclear accumulation. After 96 h of gefitinib treatment, we detected a reduction of β-catenin staining (Figure 1 j-l). Additionally, gefitinib induced reduction of β-catenin (Table II).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Grading of immunostaining for E-cadherin, vimentin, MMP9, cyclin D1 and β-catenin in p16-positive CERV196 cells after incubation with 2 μg/ml gefitinib and with 2 μg/ml lapatinib.

ELISA of E-cadherin, vimentin, MMP9, cyclin D1 and β-catenin expression in CERV196 cells. In p16-positive CERV196 cells, a strong expression of E-cadherin was determined in the control group (5 h=4,315 pg/mL). P16-positive CERV196 cells showed a consistent trend towards an incubation time-dependent decrease of E-cadherin after incubation with lapatinib, especially after 96 h of incubation. We identified a statistically significant increase of E-cadherin expression after 96-h treatment with gefitinib at 2 μg/ml (7,571.99 pg/ml, p<0.0001). Statistically significantly increased E-cadherin expression compared to the control was also found after 5 h of incubation with lapatinib at 2 μg/ml (5,465.28 pg/ml, p=0.0447) (Table III).

We found a low level of vimentin expression in untreated p16-positive CERV196 cells (5.62 μg/ml). Vimentin expression increased after treatment with gefitinib, especially after 96 h. The level of vimentin expression did not change significantly from 5 h to 96 h after incubation with lapatinib (Table III). In untreated p16-positive CERV196 cells, MMP9 expression increased in a time-dependent manner. Additionally, there was significant down-regulation of MMP9 expression after incubation with gefitinib for 5 h (9.02 pg/ml, p<0.0001) to 96 h (10.04 pg/ml, p<0.001). MMP9 expression also statistically significantly differed from that of the control after 5 h (9.89 pg/ml, p<0.001), 24 h (7.48 pg/ml, p<0.001) and 96 h (10.01 pg/ml, p>0.001) incubation with lapatinib.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for MMP9, cyclin D1, β-catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin expression in p16-positive CERV196 cells after incubation with lapatinib and gefitinib.

In summary, we found a lower expression level of cyclin D1 in the control group of p16-positive CERV196 cells (Table III). A strong statistically significant decrease of cyclin D1 expression was found in p16-positive CERV196 cells after 5 (0.71, p=0.0495), 24 (0.39, p=0.0495) and 96 h (0.27, p=0.0369) incubation with lapatinib. Incubation with gefitinib had a significant impact on cyclin D1 repression after 5 (0.72, p=0.0495), 24 (0.49, p=0.0495) and 96 h (0.33, p=0.0339) incubation. The maximal statistically significant repression of cyclin D1 was measured after 96 h of incubation with lapatinib (0.27, p=0.0369). In untreated p16-positive CERV196 cells, we revealed a high level of β-catenin expression, especially after 5 and 96 h. We identified a statistically significant decrease of β-catenin expression after incubation with gefitinib in a time-dependent manner (p<0.041). Additionally, after incubation with lapatinib, β-catenin expression was also significantly down-regulated time-dependently, but compared to incubation with gefitinib, stronger repression after lapatinib treatment was found, especially after 96 h (4,007.33, p<0.001) (Table III). mRNA expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, cyclin D1 and MMP9 in CERV196 cells. To obtain information on E-cadherin, vimentin, cyclin D1 and MMP9 expression during lapatinib and gefitinib treatment, mRNA was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR after 5, 24 and 96 h lapatinib and gefitinib treatment of p16-positive CERV196 cells. Results are presented in Figure 2. We detected a time-dependent up-regulation of E-cadherin mRNA expression after lapatinib and gefitinib treatment. The strongest increase of mRNA expression of E-cadherin was found after 5 h incubation with lapatinib. In contrast, it was observed that lapatinib and gefitinib caused a time-dependent down-regulation of mRNA for vimentin and cyclin D1. The most prominent effect was seen for cyclin D1 mRNA after 96 h incubation with gefitinib (Figure 2).

Discussion

A sub-group of HNSCC is caused by infection with high-risk types of HPV, especially cancer of the oropharynx (36). In 2007, HPV, particularly HPV 16, was recognized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a risk factor for OPSCC (5). In many studies, it was described that patients with HPV-positive OPSCC had a much better response to chemoradiotherapy than patients with HPV-negative OPSCC (5). It is also described that patients with HPV-positive SCC are younger and have a better prognosis than patients with HPV-negative SCC (37). Therefore, most patients with HPV-positive OPSCC may not require the intensive chemoradiotherapy regimen administered today to most patients and which is associated with serious side-effects and increased costs for society. As a result, it is essential to identify which patients should and which should not receive intensified therapy. Consequently, both HPV prevention and individualized therapy are important issues for this type of cancer. To improve individualized treatment, more molecular and immunological knowledge is necessary to determine the efficacy of different treatments according to HPV status and to define predictive biomarkers for identifying more appropriate treatment.

The cyclin D1 protein has been extensively examined in cancer development and is seen as an important regulator of the G1-to-S-phase transition in the cell cycle and might be shown to mediate DNA repair (31). In an other meta-analysis, cyclin D1 overexpression was significantly associated with poor overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer (38). Contrastingly, Ren and colleagues in their meta-analysis showed an immunhistochemical up-regulation of cyclin D1 in bladder cancer in association with a good progression-free survival (39). Two viral oncoproteins of high-risk HPV types, E6 and E7, support tumor progression by inactivating the p53 and retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor-suppressor gene products (37). Mutations of Rb are rare, but expression of upstream regulators of Rb function, such as cyclin D1, is commonly altered in HNSCC (40).

Aberrant EGFR signaling can often be observed in HNSCC during the oncogenic process. Overexpression of EGFR correlates with tumor spread and poor prognosis (41). Interestingly, it is suggested that EGFR alterations, defined as high gene copy numbers and overexpression, are inversely correlated to HPV-positive SCC (42, 43). However, a sub-group of HPV-positive tumors expressed a high level of EGFR (44, 45). Will this subgroup of patients benefit from drug targeting? The molecular target therapies specifically directed to EGFR might improve the outcomes and reduce toxicities (7). Identification of the tumor cell phenotype responsible for malignant potential is therefore of high clinical interest. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression pattern of vimentin, E-cadherin, β-catenin, MMP9 and cyclin D1 quantitatively and qualitatively in HPV-positive SCC cells before and after incubation with lapatinib and gefitinib. Our data showed stronger expression of E-cadherin, down-regulation of vimentin expression in untreated p16-positive CERV196 cells. After incubation with lapatinib, and gefitinib, we demonstrated an up-regulation of E-cadherin and down-regulation of vimentin, especially after 24 h incubation. Less up-regulation of vimentin protein was detected after 96 h of gefitinib treatment.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Graphical presentation of changes in mRNA expression of E-cadherin (a), vimentin (b), cyclin D1 (c), and β-catenin (d) in p16-positive CERV196 cells after incubation with lapatinib (2 μg/ml) and gefitinib (2 μg/ml). Experiments were performed in triplicate; columns show the mean value and standard error of the mean as a percentage of the untreated control.

Maseki and colleagues found that the EMT in gefitinib-resistant cells of HNSCC is mediated by the down-regulation of EGFR and compensatory activation of downstream protein kinase B/glycogen synthase kinase-beta-3 pathway (46). Despite an initial response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutant cancer, most eventually show resistance and this results in treatment failure. EMT is associated with drug resistance and act as a determinant of insensitivity to EGFR-TKI (47).

The EMT of tumor cells is associated with nuclear accumulation of the transcriptional activator β-catenin (28). Interestingly, we quantitatively found less up-regulation of mRNA expression of β-catenin, particularly after 24 h treatment with gefitinib. After prolonged treatment with gefitinib and with lapatinib, a decrease in mRNA expression of β-catenin was detected. In contrast to this, the protein expression of β-catenin was statistically significantly time-dependently down-regulated. We also found an increase in nuclear and membranous staining of β-catenin after 24 h treatment with gefitinib. Interestingly, aberrant nuclear expression of β-catenin can also confer EMT and stem cell formation of tumor cells, thereby driving malignant tumor progression (28).

In quantitative real-time PCR, there was a remarkable increase of E-cadherin gene expression and a decrease of vimentin gene expression, as well as of cyclin D1 in a time-dependent manner, supporting the hypothesis of preventing EMT by EGFR inhibition. EGF/ transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1)-driven EMT in OSCC indicated a most extensive up-regulation of MMP2 and MMP9 (48). Additionally, we noted strong significant down-regulation of MMP9 expression after gefitinib and lapatinib treatment in a time-dependent manner. The EMT is a complex process mainly characterized by decreasing expression of epithelial markers (e.g. E-cadherin), and up-regulation of mesenchymal markers (e.g. vimentin). La Monica and colleagues studying EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells demonstrated that continuous exposure to gefitinib prevented the EMT, with increased E-cadherin expression and down-regulation of N-cadherin and vimentin (49). This further supports our hypothesis that gefitinib is capable of inhibiting phenotypic changes associated with the EMT. Interestingly, we found high expression of cyclin D1 in the control group of p16-positive CERV196 cell. Li and colleagues demonstrated down-regulation of cyclin D1 expression in the presence of HPV in SCC of the tonsils. In recent studies, overexpression of cyclin D1 was associated with poor clinicopathological outcome and survival in OSCC and colorectal cancer (34, 38, 50). Cyclin D1 and MMP9 may be prognostic markers in clinical practice. After incubation with lapatinib and gefitinib, we found a strong significant repression of cyclin D1 and MMP9 in p16-positive SCC cells. O'Neill and colleagues also showed a strong down-regulation of cyclin D1 in lapatinib-sensitive breast cancer cells following 12-h treatment (51). Cyclin D1 and MMP9 expression profiles may be suggested as an early measure of sensitivity and the level of response to gefitinib and lapatinib. Several factors during EMT play significant roles in the development of drug resistance, but these are dependent on the metastatic grade of the tumor, which is defined as the level of de-differentiation and degree of EMT. The mechanistic role of EMT markers dependent on cell-cell contact that have been associated with HNSCC cells should be characterized more clearly in order to develop new anti-HNSCC therapies that prevent EMT progression. In our study, the cells were grown to sub-confluence before starting treatments. Cell-cell contact is also suggested to play an important role in regulation of EMT. In TGFβ1-induced transdifferentiation of kidney cells into α-smooth muscle actin-expressing myofibroblasts, cell-cell junctions are essential (52).

In summary, we showed a strong significant cyclin D1 and MMP9 repression induced by lapatinib and gefitinib in a p16-positive CERV196 squamous cell line. Despite this, overexpression and activity of MMP9 was demonstrated to have prognostic significance in the progression of SCC. Furthermore, it was proven how MMPs are linked to tumor progression and may improve therapeutic strategies. The cyclin D1 and MMP9 expression profile may be suggested to represent an early measure of sensitivity and level of response to lapatinib and gefitinib. The presented cell culture model is, therefore, well-suited to further study the epigenetic regulation of molecular targeted-therapy by anti-EGFR treatment and in preventing EMT in p16-positive SCC.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank Petra Prohaska for her excellent technical assistance, and Professor PD Dr. C. Weiss for his brilliant assistance in statistical analysis.

  • Received March 30, 2015.
  • Revision received May 6, 2015.
  • Accepted May 7, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Dorsey K,
    2. Agulnik M
    : Promising new molecular targeted therapies in head and neck cancer. Drugs 73: 315-325, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Sudhoff HH,
    2. Schwarze HP,
    3. Winder D,
    4. Steinstraesser L,
    5. Gorner M,
    6. Stanley M,
    7. Goon PK
    : Evidence for a causal association for HPV in head and neck cancers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268: 1541-1547, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Wheeler S,
    2. Siwak DR,
    3. Chai R,
    4. LaValle C,
    5. Seethala RR,
    6. Wang L,
    7. Cieply K,
    8. Sherer C,
    9. Joy C,
    10. Mills GB,
    11. Argiris A,
    12. Siegfried JM,
    13. Grandis JR,
    14. Egloff AM
    : Tumor epidermal growth factor receptor and EGFR PY1068 are independent prognostic indicators for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 18: 2278-2289, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. O charoenrat P,
    2. Rhys-Evans P,
    3. Court WJ,
    4. Box GM,
    5. Eccles SA
    : Differential modulation of proliferation, matrix metalloproteinase expression and invasion of human head and neck squamous carcinoma cells by c-ERBB ligands. Clin Exp Metast 17: 631-639, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Dalianis T
    : Human papillomavirus (HPV) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Presse Med 43: e429-e434, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Huang SH,
    2. O'Sullivan B
    : Oral cancer: Current role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal 18: e233-240, 2013a.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Denaro N,
    2. Russi EG,
    3. Adamo V,
    4. Merlano MC
    : State-of-the-art and emerging treatment options in the management of head and neck cancer: news from 2013. Oncology 86: 212-229, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Burris HA 3rd.
    : Dual kinase inhibition in the treatment of breast cancer: initial experience with the EGFR/ErbB-2 inhibitor lapatinib. The oncologist 9 Suppl 3: 10-15, 2004a.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Erjala K,
    2. Sundvall M,
    3. Junttila TT,
    4. Zhang N,
    5. Savisalo M,
    6. Mali P,
    7. Kulmala J,
    8. Pulkkinen J,
    9. Grenman R,
    10. Elenius K
    : Signaling via ERBB2 and ERBB3 associates with resistance and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification with sensitivity to EGFR inhibitor gefitinib in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 12: 4103-4111, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Yoo SB,
    2. Kim YJ,
    3. Kim H,
    4. Jin Y,
    5. Sun PL,
    6. Jheon S,
    7. Lee JS,
    8. Chung JH
    : Alteration of the E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex predicts poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) Treatment. Annals of surgical oncology 20 Suppl 3: 545-552, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Fumagalli I,
    2. Dugue D,
    3. Bibault JE,
    4. Clemenson C,
    5. Vozenin MC,
    6. Mondini M,
    7. Deutsch E
    : Cytotoxic effect of lapatinib is restricted to human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. OncoTargets and therapy 8: 335-345, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Hay ED
    : The mesenchymal cell, its role in the embryo, and the remarkable signaling mechanisms that create it. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists 233: 706-720, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Huber MA,
    2. Kraut N,
    3. Beug H
    : Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression. Current opinion in cell biology 17: 548-558, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Krisanaprakornkit S,
    2. Iamaroon A
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in oral squamous cell carcinoma. ISRN oncology 2012: 681469, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Al Moustafa AE,
    2. Achkhar A,
    3. Yasmeen A
    : EGF-receptor signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human carcinomas. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 4: 671-684, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Yang ZC,
    2. Yi MJ,
    3. Ran N,
    4. Wang C,
    5. Fu P,
    6. Fueng XY,
    7. Xu L,
    8. Qu ZH
    : Transforming growth factor-beta1 induces bronchial epithelial cells to mesenchymal transition by activating the Snail pathway and promotes airway remodeling in asthma. Mol Med Rep 8: 1663-1668, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Lee JM,
    2. Dedhar S,
    3. Kalluri R,
    4. Thompson EW
    : The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development, and disease. The Journal of cell biology 172: 973-981, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Al-Azri AR,
    2. Gibson RJ,
    3. Keefe DM,
    4. Logan RM
    : Matrix metalloproteinases: Do they play a role in mucosal pathology of the oral cavity? Oral diseases 19: 347-359, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Martins VL,
    2. Caley M,
    3. O'Toole EA
    : Matrix metalloproteinases and epidermal wound repair. Cell and tissue research 351: 255-268, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. de Andres MC,
    2. Kingham E,
    3. Imagawa K,
    4. Gonzalez A,
    5. Roach HI,
    6. Wilson DI,
    7. Oreffo RO
    : Epigenetic regulation during fetal femur development: DNA methylation matters. PloS one 8: e54957, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Tamamura R,
    2. Nagatsuka H,
    3. Siar CH,
    4. Katase N,
    5. Naito I,
    6. Sado Y,
    7. Nagai N
    : Comparative analysis of basal lamina type IV collagen alpha chains, matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 expressions in oral dysplasia and invasive carcinoma. Acta histochemica 115: 113-119, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Folgueras AR,
    2. Pendas AM,
    3. Sanchez LM,
    4. Lopez-Otin C
    : Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: from new functions to improved inhibition strategies. The International journal of developmental biology 48: 411-424, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. O charoenrat P,
    2. Modjtahedi H,
    3. Rhys-Evans P,
    4. Court WJ,
    5. Box GM,
    6. Eccles SA
    : Epidermal growth factor-like ligands differentially up-regulate matrix metalloproteinase 9 in head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Cancer research 60: 1121-1128, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Umbreit C,
    2. Flanjak J,
    3. Weiss C,
    4. Erben P,
    5. Aderhold C,
    6. Faber A,
    7. Stern-Straeter J,
    8. Hoermann K,
    9. Schultz JD
    : Incomplete epithelial-mesenchymal transition in p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma cells correlates with beta-catenin expression. Anticancer research 34: 7061-7069, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Lamouille S,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Derynck R
    : Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology 15: 178-196, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Rodrigues IS,
    2. Lavorato-Rocha AM,
    3. de MMB,
    4. Stiepcich MM,
    5. de Carvalho FM,
    6. Baiocchi G,
    7. Soares FA,
    8. Rocha RM
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like events in vulvar cancer and its relation with HPV. British journal of cancer 109: 184-194, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Guo F,
    2. Parker Kerrigan BC,
    3. Yang D,
    4. Yang D,
    5. Hu L,
    6. Shmulevisch I,
    7. Sood AK,
    8. Xue F,
    9. Zhang W
    : Post-transcriptional regulatory network of epithelial-to-mesenchymal and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transitions. Journal of hematology & oncology 7: 19, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Brabletz T,
    2. Hlubek F,
    3. Spaderna S,
    4. Schmalhofer O,
    5. Hiendlmeyer E,
    6. Jung A,
    7. Kirchner T
    : Invasion and metastasis in colorectal cancer: epithelial-mesenchymal transition, mesenchymal-epithelial transition, stem cells and beta-catenin. Cells, tissues, organs 179: 56-65, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Tsai JH,
    2. Yang J
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in carcinoma metastasis. Genes & development 27: 2192-2206, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Saawarn S,
    2. Astekar M,
    3. Saawarn N,
    4. Dhakar N,
    5. Gomateshwar Sagari S
    : Cyclin D1 expression and its correlation with histopathological differentiation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. TheScientificWorldJournal 2012: 978327, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Gioacchini FM,
    2. Alicandri-Ciufelli M,
    3. Kaleci S,
    4. Magliulo G,
    5. Presutti L,
    6. Re M
    : The prognostic value of cyclin D1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014.
  27. ↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Thompson CH,
    3. Cossart YE,
    4. O‘Brien CJ,
    5. McNeil EB,
    6. Scolyer RA,
    7. Rose BR
    : The expression of key cell cycle markers and presence of human papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil. Head & neck 26: 1-9, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Masuda M,
    2. Hirakawa N,
    3. Nakashima T,
    4. Kuratomi Y,
    5. Komiyama S
    : Cyclin D1 overexpression in primary hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Cancer 78: 390-395, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Yu D,
    3. Li H,
    4. Nie P,
    5. Zhu Y,
    6. Liu S,
    7. Zhu M,
    8. Fang B
    : Cyclin D1 overexpression is associated with poor clinicopathological outcome and survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma in Asian populations: insights from a meta-analysis. PloS one 9: e93210, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Pfaffl MW
    : A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic acids research 29: e45, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Klussmann JP,
    2. Preuss SF,
    3. Speel EJ
    : Human papillomavirus and cancer of the oropharynx. Molecular interaction and clinical implications. HNO 57: 113-122, 2009 (in German).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Gillison ML,
    2. Koch WM,
    3. Capone RB,
    4. Spafford M,
    5. Westra WH,
    6. Wu L,
    7. Zahurak ML,
    8. Daniel RW,
    9. Viglione M,
    10. Symer DE,
    11. Shah KV,
    12. Sidransky D
    : Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 92: 709-720, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Wei J,
    3. Xu C,
    4. Zhao Z,
    5. You T
    : Prognostic significance of cyclin D1 expression in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PloS one 9: e94508, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Ren B,
    2. Li W,
    3. Yang Y,
    4. Wu S
    : The impact of cyclin D1 overexpression on the prognosis of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. World journal of surgical oncology 12: 55, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Sidransky D
    : Molecular genetics of head and neck cancer. Current opinion in oncology 7: 229-233, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Sun Q,
    2. Prasad R,
    3. Rosenthal E,
    4. Katiyar SK
    : Grape seed proanthocyanidins inhibit the invasiveness of human HNSCC cells by targeting EGFR and reversing the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. PloS one 7: e31093, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Kumar B,
    2. Cordell KG,
    3. Lee JS,
    4. Worden FP,
    5. Prince ME,
    6. Tran HH,
    7. Wolf GT,
    8. Urba SG,
    9. Chepeha DB,
    10. Teknos TN,
    11. Eisbruch A,
    12. Tsien CI,
    13. Taylor JM,
    14. D‘Silva NJ,
    15. Yang K,
    16. Kurnit DM,
    17. Bauer JA,
    18. Bradford CR,
    19. Carey TE
    : EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, BCL-xL and p53, sex, and smoking as indicators of response to therapy and survival in oropharyngeal cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 26: 3128-3137, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Reimers N,
    2. Kasper HU,
    3. Weissenborn SJ,
    4. Stutzer H,
    5. Preus SF,
    6. Hoffmann TK,
    7. Speel EJ,
    8. Dienes HP,
    9. Pflister HJ,
    10. Guntinas-Lichius O,
    11. Klussmann JP
    : Combined analysis of HPV-DNA, p16 and EGFR expression to predict prognosis in oropharyngeal cancer. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer 120: 1731-1738, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Kim SH,
    2. Juhnn YS,
    3. Kang S,
    4. Park SW,
    5. Sung MW,
    6. Bang YJ,
    7. Song YS
    : Human papillomavirus 16 E5 up-regulates the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor through the activation of epidermal growth factor receptor, MEK/ ERK1,2 and PI3K/AKT. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS 63: 930-938, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Narayanan R,
    2. Kim HN,
    3. Narayanan NK,
    4. Nargi D,
    5. Narayanan B
    : Epidermal growth factor-stimulated human cervical cancer cell growth is associated with EGFR and cyclin D1 activation, independent of COX-2 expression levels. International journal of oncology 40: 13-20, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Maseki S,
    2. Ijichi K,
    3. Tanaka H,
    4. Fujii M,
    5. Hasegawa Y,
    6. Ogawa T,
    7. Murakami S,
    8. Kondo E,
    9. Nakanishi H
    : Acquisition of EMT phenotype in the gefitinib-resistant cells of a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line through AKT/GSK-3beta/SNAIL signalling pathway. British journal of cancer 106: 1196-1204, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Xie M,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. He CS,
    4. Xu F,
    5. Liu JL,
    6. Hu ZH,
    7. Zhao LP,
    8. Tian Y
    : Activation of Notch-1 enhances epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gefitinib-acquired resistant lung cancer cells. Journal of cellular biochemistry 113: 1501-1513, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Richter P,
    2. Umbreit C,
    3. Franz M,
    4. Berndt A,
    5. Grimm S,
    6. Uecker A,
    7. Bohmer FD,
    8. Kosmehl H,
    9. Berndt A
    : EGF/TGFbeta1 co-stimulation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells causes an epithelial-mesenchymal transition cell phenotype expressing laminin 332. Journal of oral pathology & medicine: official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology 40: 46-54, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. La Monica S,
    2. Caffarra C,
    3. Saccani F,
    4. Galvani E,
    5. Galetti M,
    6. Fumarola C,
    7. Bonelli M,
    8. Cavazzoni A,
    9. Cretella D,
    10. Sirangelo R,
    11. Gatti R,
    12. Tiseo M,
    13. Ardizzoni A,
    14. Giovannetti E,
    15. Petronini PG,
    16. Alfieri RR
    : Gefitinib inhibits invasive phenotype and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in drug-resistant NSCLC cells with MET amplification. PloS one 8: e78656, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Makki MS,
    4. Wen J,
    5. Dai Y,
    6. Shi Q,
    7. Liu Q,
    8. Zhou X,
    9. Wang J
    : Overexpression of beta-catenin and cyclinD1 predicts a poor prognosis in ovarian serous carcinomas. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology 7: 264-271, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. O'Neill F,
    2. Madden SF,
    3. Aherne ST,
    4. Clynes M,
    5. Crown J,
    6. Doolan P,
    7. O‘Connor R
    : Gene expression changes as markers of early lapatinib response in a panel of breast cancer cell lines. Molecular cancer 11: 41, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Fan L,
    2. Sebe A,
    3. Peterfi Z,
    4. Masszi A,
    5. Thirone AC,
    6. Rotstein OD,
    7. Nakano H,
    8. McCulloch CA,
    9. Szaszi K,
    10. Mucsi I,
    11. Kapus A
    : Cell contact-dependent regulation of epithelial-myofibroblast transition via the rho-rho kinase-phospho-myosin pathway. Molecular biology of the cell 18: 1083-1097, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 35 (7)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 7
July 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MMP9, Cyclin D1 and β-Catenin Are Useful Markers of p16-positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Therapeutic EGFR Inhibition In Vitro
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
17 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
MMP9, Cyclin D1 and β-Catenin Are Useful Markers of p16-positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Therapeutic EGFR Inhibition In Vitro
CLAUDIA UMBREIT, PHILIPP ERBEN, ANNE FABER, RALF-DIETER HOFHEINZ, CHRISTOPH ADERHOLD, CHRISTEL WEISS, KARL HOERMANN, ANGELA WENZEL, JOHANNES DAVID SCHULTZ
Anticancer Research Jul 2015, 35 (7) 3801-3810;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
MMP9, Cyclin D1 and β-Catenin Are Useful Markers of p16-positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Therapeutic EGFR Inhibition In Vitro
CLAUDIA UMBREIT, PHILIPP ERBEN, ANNE FABER, RALF-DIETER HOFHEINZ, CHRISTOPH ADERHOLD, CHRISTEL WEISS, KARL HOERMANN, ANGELA WENZEL, JOHANNES DAVID SCHULTZ
Anticancer Research Jul 2015, 35 (7) 3801-3810;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Gefitinib Enhances Mitochondrial Biological Functions in NSCLCs with EGFR Mutations at a High Cell Density
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 5-Azacytidine (5-aza) Induces p53-associated Cell Death Through Inhibition of DNA Methyltransferase Activity in Hep3B and HT-29 Cells
  • Prognostic Value of WNT1, NOTCH1, PDGFRβ, and CXCR4 in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Hypoxia-adapted Multiple Myeloma Stem Cells Resist γδ-T-Cell-mediated Killing by Modulating the Mevalonate Pathway
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • gefitinib
  • lapatinib
  • MMP9
  • cyclin D1
  • β-catenin
  • epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)
  • head and neck squamous cancer cells (HNSCC)
  • epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)
  • mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET)
  • human papillomavirus (HPV)
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire