Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Significant Association of Cyclo-oxygenase 2 Genotypes with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

WEN-SHIN CHANG, CHENG-HSI LIAO, CHIN-MU HSU, CHUNG-YU HUANG, HSIN-YUAN FANG, PEI-YU KAO, CHIA-WEN TSAI, HSI-CHIN WU, PEI-SHIN HU, TZU-CHIA WANG, YUN-RU SYU, HAO-AI SHUI and DA-TIAN BAU
Anticancer Research May 2015, 35 (5) 2725-2730;
WEN-SHIN CHANG
1Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
2Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHENG-HSI LIAO
1Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
3Department of Urology, Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIN-MU HSU
2Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHUNG-YU HUANG
4Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HSIN-YUAN FANG
2Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PEI-YU KAO
2Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIA-WEN TSAI
2Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HSI-CHIN WU
5Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PEI-SHIN HU
6Department of Ophthalmology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TZU-CHIA WANG
2Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUN-RU SYU
2Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HAO-AI SHUI
4Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DA-TIAN BAU
1Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
2Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: artbau1{at}yahoo.com.twartbau2{at}gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: Reliable biomarkers are in urgent need for diagnosis, outcome prediction and treatment-effect monitoring for upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). Although up-regulation of cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) is found in stroma and tumor cells in more than half of the patients with UTUC investigated, the genomic contribution of COX2 to UTUC has not been studied. The study aimed to evaluate the association of six polymorphic genotypes of COX2 with UTUC within a Taiwanese population. Materials and Methods: A total of 218 patients with UTUC and 580 healthy controls were genotyped for six COX2 polymorphisms, namely A-1195G, G-765C, T+8473C, intron 1, intron 5 and intron 6, and examined for their association with UTUC risk. Results: The distribution of genotypes of COX2 G-765C and intron 5 were significantly different between patient and control groups (p=0.0001 and 0.0016, respectively), while others were not (p>0.05). The haplotype analysis showed that compared to the GG/TT haplotype of COX2 G-765C/intron 5, those carrying GG/AT variants have a significantly increased risk of UTUC (odds ratio=4.83, 95% confidence interval=1.79-13.06), while those carrying CG/TT variants have a decreased risk (odds ratio=0.26, 95% confidence interval=0.14-0.49). Conclusion: Our results suggest that individual and combined COX2 G-765C/intron 5 genotypes play a role in controlling COX2 expression and UTUC development.

  • COX2
  • genotype
  • polymorphism
  • Taiwan
  • upper tract urothelial cancer

Upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is a universal problem. However, the relative incidences of urothelial cancer of the renal pelvis, ureter and bladder for Western countries and Taiwan were 3:1:51 and 1:2.08:6.72, respectively (1). This higher incidence in Taiwan makes it worthwhile starting the genomic and proteomic studies for UTUC from Taiwan and then compare these with the counterpart findings in Western populations. Epidemiologically speaking, mounting evidence has shown that the elevated incidence of UTUC may be associated with arsenic exposure, smoking habit, analgesic abuse, occupational carcinogen exposure, hypertension, long-standing urinary obstruction, infection and Balkan nephropathy (2-6). Recently, mounting evidence has suggested that genetic polymorphic variations may also predispose to the development of UTUC (7, 8).

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX2) is an inducible enzyme for the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostanoid, prostaglandin and thromboxane (9). Typically, COX2 is often undetectable in normal tissues. In 2012, it was found that COX2 was up-regulated in the stromal and tumoral sites from UTUC, which could serve as a prognostic marker for poor clinical outcome of UTUC (10). The samples included 128 paired tumoral and stromal specimens, and the up-regulation of COX2 was strongly associated with higher cancer-specific deaths and cancer recurrence rates (10). However, it is inconvenient to collect tissue from large numbers of healthy individuals for prediction and immunochemistry for protein expression is not as quick, convenient, and repeatable as DNA sequencing assays. At the DNA level, the contribution of COX2 genotype to UTUC has never been studied as far as we are aware of. The overexpression of COX2 may contribute to carcinogenesis via increasing cell proliferation, suppressing apoptosis, enhancing invasiveness, and inducing chronic activation of immune responses and angiogenesis (11-13). Based on the evidence collected from animal and clinical models, COX2-specific inhibitors have both preventative and therapeutic effects as anticancer drugs for breast, bladder, lung and pancreatic cancer (14-18).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Primer sequences and restriction fragment length polymorphism conditions for cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) genotyping analyses.

Following the rule of central dogma, subtle genetic variants of the COX2 gene may affect the quantity of COX2 protein through altered self-regulated transcriptional activity or alternative splicing resulting from polymorphic variations at the promoter region or introns, respectively (19, 20). With the aim of clarifying the hypothesis that the polymorphic variants at promoter or intron regions of COX2 may be associated with the risk of UTUC, the current study determined the genotypic frequency of six polymorphisms of COX2 at A-1195G (rs689466), G-765C (rs20417), T+8473C (rs5275), intron 1 (rs2745557), intron 5 (rs16825748) and intron 6 (rs2066826), and their contribution to UTUC susceptibility in Taiwan.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection. A total of 218 patients with UTUC were recruited at the China Medical University and Kaohsiung Medical University medical Centers, all of whom were diagnosed by pathological examination of specimens obtained by biopsy or surgical resection. The clinical and histopathological information were collected from patient charts and pathological reports. The information was reviewed, and the data were entered into a database. The tumor stage was assigned according to the TNM staging system (21), and the pathological grade was determined according to the World Health Organization criteria (22). Five hundred and eighty healthy individuals, who had been matched with the patients by age, admitted to the same hospital for a health checkup and who had no previous diagnosis of neoplastic urological disease or other malignancy were enrolled as controls. All the participants enrolled provided their informed consent and Human Research Committees approved this study.

Genotyping conditions. The total genomic DNA for each participant was extracted from the leucocytes of peripheral blood and stored as previously described (23-25). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycling conditions were: one cycle at 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Pairs of PCR primer sequences and restriction enzyme for each DNA product of COX2 genotyping work are all listed in Table I. The PCR products were cut by appropriate restriction enzymes and the reaction mixture was incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Then 10 μl of each PCR product was loaded into a 3% agarose gel for electrophoresis.

Statistical analyses. Data for 218 UTUC cases and 580 controls were analyzed. To ensure that the controls used were representative of the general population and to exclude the possibility of genotyping error, the deviation of the genotypic frequencies of COX2 single nucleotide polymorphism in the controls from those expected under the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using the goodness-of-fit test. Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test (when the expected number in any cell was less than five) was used to compare the distribution of the COX2 genotypes between cases and controls. Cancer risk associated with the genotypes was estimated as odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using unconditional logistic regression. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 14.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) on two-sided probabilities. The correlation between categorical variables was calculated for statistical significance using Pearson's chi-square test and the threshold for significance was p<0.05.

Results

The frequency distributions of clinical characteristics for the participants (218 UTUC patients and 580 healthy controls) are shown in Table II. Epidemiologically, there was no difference in the frequency distribution by the gender (p=0.4256) or age (p=0.8518) since the populations were well-matched (Table II). From the clinical and pathological viewpoints, tumors were distributed in renal pelvic, ureter and multiple sites were 38.5%, 34.9% and 26.6%, respectively. Among the patients, 60.6% had high grade tumor, and 77.1% were of stages lower than pT3 (Table II).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Frequency distributions of clinical characteristics among patients with upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) and healthy controls.

The frequencies of the genotypes for COX2 A-1195G, G-765C, T+8473C, intron 1, intron 5, and intron 6 among the patients with UTUC and healthy controls are summarized and analyzed in Table III. Among the six polymorphic genotypes investigated, two of them, G-765C (OR=0.32, 95% CI=0.19-0.55; p=0.0001) and intron 5 (OR=3.91, 95% CI=1.71-8.95; p=0.0016), were found to be differentially distributed between UTUC cases and control groups (Table III). The frequencies of GG and CG genotypes of COX2 G-765C were 92.7% and 7.3% among UTUC cases, and 80.2% and 19.8% among healthy controls, respectively. The frequencies of TT and AT genotypes of COX2 intron 5 were 93.6% and 6.4% among UTUC cases, and 98.1% and 1.9% among healthy controls, respectively (Table III). For other polymorphic sites of COX2, there was no difference in the distribution of genotypes among UTUC cases and controls (Table III).

In the next step, we performed the allelic frequency analysis, and the frequencies of the alleles for COX2 A-1195G, G-765C, T+8473C, intron 1, intron 5, and intron 6 among the UTUC cases and healthy controls are summarized in Table IV. Consistent with the findings of Table III, G-765C and intron 5 of COX2 were found to be associated with UTUC risk (Table IV). In detail, higher frequencies of G allele in G-765C and A allele in intron 5 in the UTUC case group than the control group were associated with higher risk of UTUC (Table IV; p=0.0001 and 0.0017, respectively). Regarding the other four COX2 polymorphic sites, no distribution of their allelic frequencies was found to be significantly different between the control and UTUC case groups (Table IV).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Distributions of cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) genotypic frequencies among the upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) cases and controls.

Considering the possible interactions between the two determinant COX2 genotypes for UTUC susceptibility, the haplotypic distributions of COX2 G-765C and intron 5 were further analyzed (Table V). We set the most abundant genotypes for both G-765C and intron 5 genotypes as being wild-type for haplotypic combination. Under this criteria, the GG genotype for COX2 G-765C and TT for COX2 intron 5 were selected, resulting in the GG/TT combined genotype for G-765C/intron 5 as the reference haplotype. Compared to the reference haplotype of COX2 G-765C/intron 5, the GG/AT group was found to be associated with a significantly higher risk of UTUC (OR=4.83, 95%CI=1.79-13.06; p=0.0014), while CG/TT carried a lower risk (OR=0.26, 95%CI=0.14-0.49; p=0.0001) (Table V). After adjusting for age and gender, the differences became more obvious for the GG/AT and CG/TT groups, with their individual ORs altered to 4.86 and 0.32, remaining highly statistically significant (Table V). The combination of CG/AT did not confer significantly altered cancer risk compared to the wild-type haplotype before or after adjusting for age and gender (Table V).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Distributions of cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) allelic frequencies among the upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) cases and controls.

Discussion

Urothelial carcinoma is the second most common cancer which usually arises from the urothelium with transitional cell differentiation, including that of the renal pelvis, ureter and bladder. In literature, there are at least 600 articles investigating the contribution of individual genomic variations to bladder cancer (26-30), while few relate them to UTUC (7, 31, 32). Following the molecular central dogma, the single nucleotide variations of COX2 may determine differential expression of COX2 and personal susceptibility to cancer. The supporting data for this come from the finding that COX2 is often undetectable in normal tissues, whereas overexpression of COX2 has been observed in neoplastic cells of canine (33) and human renal cell carcinoma (34-36). In a previous study, we found COX2 to be up-regulated in both stromal and tumoral cells of more than half of the patients with UTUC and the positive expression of COX2 in stromal cells may be a biomarker for UTUC-specific death and recurrence (10). However, the contribution of COX2 genotypes to UTUC has never been studied.

In this study, the COX2 genotype of 218 patients with UTUC together with 580 controls (Table III) was examined. Statistically, the distributions of COX2 genotypes for G-765C and intron 5 were differentially distributed among the UTUC and healthy control groups (Table III). In addition, the allelic frequencies of the two polymorphisms were also differentially distributed between the two groups (Table IV). The results showed that the G allele of G-765C and A allele of intron 5 were associated with higher risk for UTUC and the haplotype analysis suggested that individuals with GG/AT and CG/TT haplotypes at G-765C/intron 5 were at altered risk of UTUC before and after adjusting for gender and age (Table V). UTUC is not a common type of cancer in Taiwan, nor worldwide, which may be one of the limitation for genomic study of UTUC. Compared to previous findings, we enlarged the sample size from 56 cases and 436 controls in 2011 (37) to 218 cases and 580 controls (Table II). The strengthened sample size and the same trend for significant differences in genotypic distribution after age and gender adjustments highlight the value, accuracy and reliability of the overall findings (Table V).

This is the first genomic study of UTUC to show COX2 G-765C and intron 5 genotypes being associated with UTUC risk. The G allele of COX2 G-765C and A allele of COX2 intron 5 were found to be genomic risk factors and may serve as early screening and predictive biomarkers for UTUC in Taiwan and elsewhere.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Distribution of cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) G-765C /intron 5 haplotypes among patients with upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) and controls.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank all the colleagues at both China Medical University and Kaohsiung Medical University medical centers (Dr. Ke, Lin and Wu) for their contribution to sample collection. They also appreciate the technical assistance from our colleges Hong-Xue Ji, Chieh-Lun Hsiao, Chia-En Miao and Lin-Lin Hou. This study was supported by research grants from Terry Fox Cancer Research Foundation, Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital (104A21) and in part by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence (MOHW104-TDU-B-212-113002).

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contribute equally to this study.

  • Received January 15, 2015.
  • Revision received February 2, 2015.
  • Accepted February 4, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Yang MH,
    2. Chen KK,
    3. Yen CC,
    4. Wang WS,
    5. Chang YH,
    6. Huang WJ,
    7. Fan FS,
    8. Chiou TJ,
    9. Liu JH,
    10. Chen PM
    : Unusually high incidence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan. Urology 59: 681-687, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mellemgaard A,
    2. Carstensen B,
    3. Norgaard N,
    4. Knudsen JB,
    5. Olsen JH
    : Trends in the incidence of cancer of the kidney, pelvis, ureter and bladder in Denmark 1943-88. Scand J Urol Nephrol 27: 327-332, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. McLaughlin JK,
    2. Silverman DT,
    3. Hsing AW,
    4. Ross RK,
    5. Schoenberg JB,
    6. Yu MC,
    7. Stemhagen A,
    8. Lynch CF,
    9. Blot WJ,
    10. Fraumeni JF Jr..
    : Cigarette smoking and cancers of the renal pelvis and ureter. Cancer Res 52: 254-257, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    1. Chen CJ,
    2. Hsueh YM,
    3. Lai MS,
    4. Shyu MP,
    5. Chen SY,
    6. Wu MM,
    7. Kuo TL,
    8. Tai TY
    : Increased prevalence of hypertension and long-term arsenic exposure. Hypertension 25: 53-60, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.
    1. Linet MS,
    2. Chow WH,
    3. McLaughlin JK,
    4. Wacholder S,
    5. Yu MC,
    6. Schoenberg JB,
    7. Lynch C,
    8. Fraumeni JF Jr..
    : Analgesics and cancers of the renal pelvis and ureter. Int J Cancer 62: 15-18, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Liaw KL,
    2. Linet MS,
    3. McLaughlin JK,
    4. Yu MC,
    5. Schoenberg JB,
    6. Lynch CF,
    7. Niwa S,
    8. Fraumeni JF Jr..
    : Possible relation between hypertension and cancers of the renal pelvis and ureter. Int J Cancer 70: 265-268, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lin HH,
    2. Ke HL,
    3. Hsiao KH,
    4. Tsai CW,
    5. Wu WJ,
    6. Bau DT,
    7. Chang LL
    : CCND1 1722 polymorphism and potential relevance to upper tract urothelial cancer. Anticancer Res 31: 1043-1047, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chang WS,
    2. Lin SS,
    3. Li FJ,
    4. Tsai CW,
    5. Li LY,
    6. Lien CS,
    7. Liao WL,
    8. Wu HC,
    9. Tsai CH,
    10. Shih TC,
    11. Bau DT
    : Significant association of caveolin-1 (CAV1) genotypes with upper urothelial tract cancer. Anticancer Res 33: 4907-4912, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. DeWitt DL
    : Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase: regulation of enzyme expression. Biochim Biophys Acta 1083: 121-134, 1991.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ke HL,
    2. Tu HP,
    3. Lin HH,
    4. Chai CY,
    5. Chang LL,
    6. Li WM,
    7. Li CC,
    8. Lee YC,
    9. Yeh HC,
    10. Wu WJ,
    11. Bau DT
    : Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX2) up-regulation is a prognostic marker for poor clinical outcome of upper tract urothelial cancer. Anticancer Res 32: 4111-4116, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. O'Byrne KJ,
    2. Dalgleish AG
    : Chronic immune activation and inflammation as the cause of malignancy. Br J Cancer 85: 473-483, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Kanaoka S,
    2. Takai T,
    3. Yoshida K
    : Cyclo-oxygenase-2 and tumor biology. Adv Clin Chem 43: 59-78, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Mao Z,
    3. Fan X,
    4. Cui L,
    5. Wang X
    : Cyclo-oxygenase 2 promoted the tumorigenecity of pancreatic cancer cells. Tumour Biol 35: 2271-2278, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Davies G,
    2. Salter J,
    3. Hills M,
    4. Martin LA,
    5. Sacks N,
    6. Dowsett M
    : Correlation between cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression and angiogenesis in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9: 2651-2656, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.
    1. Levitt RJ,
    2. Pollak M
    : Insulin-like growth factor-I antagonizes the antiproliferative effects of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors on BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res 62: 7372-7376, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.
    1. Mizutani Y,
    2. Kamoi K,
    3. Ukimura O,
    4. Kawauchi A,
    5. Miki T
    : Synergistic cytotoxicity and apoptosis of JTE-522, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor, and 5-fluorouracil against bladder cancer. J Urol 168: 2650-2654, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Sanchez-Alcazar JA,
    2. Bradbury DA,
    3. Pang L,
    4. Knox AJ
    : Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors induce apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer through cyclo-oxygenase-independent pathways. Lung Cancer 40: 33-44, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wang YX,
    2. Gao JX,
    3. Wang XY,
    4. Zhang L,
    5. Liu CM
    : Antiproliferative effects of selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor modulated by nimotuzumab in estrogen-dependent breast cancer cells. Tumour Biol 33: 957-966, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Szczeklik W,
    2. Sanak M,
    3. Szczeklik A
    : Functional effects and gender association of COX2 gene polymorphism G-765C in bronchial asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114: 248-253, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sugie S,
    2. Tsukino H,
    3. Mukai S,
    4. Akioka T,
    5. Shibata N,
    6. Nagano M,
    7. Kamoto T
    : Cyclo-oxygenase 2 genotypes influence prostate cancer susceptibility in Japanese Men. Tumour Biol 35: 2717-2721, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Greene FL,
    2. Page DL,
    3. Fleming ID,
    4. Fritz A,
    5. Balch CM,
    6. Haller DG,
    7. Morrow M
    (eds.) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Sixth Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Epstein JI,
    2. Amin MB,
    3. Reuter VR,
    4. Mostofi FK
    : The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. Am J Surg Pathol 22: 1435-1448, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Tsai CW,
    2. Chang WS,
    3. Liu JC,
    4. Tsai MH,
    5. Lin CC,
    6. Bau DT
    : Contribution of DNA double-strand break repair gene XRCC3 genotypes to oral cancer susceptibility in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 34: 2951-2956, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.
    1. Chang WS,
    2. Tsai CW,
    3. Ji HX,
    4. Wu HC,
    5. Chang YT,
    6. Lien CS,
    7. Liao WL,
    8. Shen WC,
    9. Tsai CH,
    10. Bau DT
    : Associations of cyclo-oxygenase 2 polymorphic genotypes with bladder cancer risk in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 33: 5401-5405, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 26.↵
    1. Primdahl H,
    2. Wikman FP,
    3. von der Maase H,
    4. Zhou XG,
    5. Wolf H,
    6. Orntoft TF
    : Allelic imbalances in human bladder cancer: genome-wide detection with high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 216-223, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 27.
    1. Hoque MO,
    2. Lee CC,
    3. Cairns P,
    4. Schoenberg M,
    5. Sidransky D
    : Genome-wide genetic characterization of bladder cancer: a comparison of high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays and PCR-based microsatellite analysis. Cancer Res 63: 2216-2222, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 28.
    1. Chang CH,
    2. Chang CL,
    3. Tsai CW,
    4. Wu HC,
    5. Chiu CF,
    6. Wang RF,
    7. Liu CS,
    8. Lin CC,
    9. Bau DT
    : Significant association of an XRCC4 single nucleotide polymorphism with bladder cancer susceptibility in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 29: 1777-1782, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 29.
    1. Chang CH,
    2. Wang RF,
    3. Tsai RY,
    4. Wu HC,
    5. Wang CH,
    6. Tsai CW,
    7. Chang CL,
    8. Tsou YA,
    9. Liu CS,
    10. Bau DT
    : Significant association of XPD codon 312 single nucleotide polymorphism with bladder cancer susceptibility in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 29: 3903-3907, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 30.↵
    1. Selinski S,
    2. Lehmann ML,
    3. Blaszkewicz M,
    4. Ovsiannikov D,
    5. Moormann O,
    6. Guballa C,
    7. Kress A,
    8. Truss MC,
    9. Gerullis H,
    10. Otto T,
    11. Barski D,
    12. Niegisch G,
    13. Albers P,
    14. Frees S,
    15. Brenner W,
    16. Thuroff JW,
    17. Angeli-Greaves M,
    18. Seidel T,
    19. Roth G,
    20. Volkert F,
    21. Ebbinghaus R,
    22. Prager HM,
    23. Lukas C,
    24. Bolt HM,
    25. Falkenstein M,
    26. Zimmermann A,
    27. Klein T,
    28. Reckwitz T,
    29. Roemer HC,
    30. Hartel M,
    31. Weistenhofer W,
    32. Schops W,
    33. Rizvi SA,
    34. Aslam M,
    35. Banfi G,
    36. Romics I,
    37. Ickstadt K,
    38. Hengstler JG,
    39. Golka K
    : Urinary bladder cancer risk in relation to a single nucleotide polymorphism (rs2854744) in the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) gene. Arch Toxicol 86: 195-203, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 31.↵
    1. Yates DR,
    2. Roupret M,
    3. Drouin SJ,
    4. Audouin M,
    5. Cancel-Tassin G,
    6. Comperat E,
    7. Bitker MO,
    8. Cussenot O
    : Genetic polymorphisms on 8q24.1 and 4p16.3 are not linked with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in contrast to their association with aggressive upper urinary tract tumours. World J Urol 31: 53-59, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 32.↵
    1. Lin HH,
    2. Ke HL,
    3. Hsiao KH,
    4. Tsai CW,
    5. Wu WJ,
    6. Bau DT,
    7. Chang LL
    : Potential role of CCND1 G870A genotype as a predictor for urothelial carcinoma susceptibility and muscle-invasiveness in Taiwan. Chin J Physiol 54: 196-202, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 33.↵
    1. Khan KN,
    2. Stanfield KM,
    3. Trajkovic D,
    4. Knapp DW
    : Expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 in canine renal cell carcinoma. Vet Pathol 38: 116-119, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 34.↵
    1. Mungan MU,
    2. Gurel D,
    3. Canda AE,
    4. Tuna B,
    5. Yorukoglu K,
    6. Kirkali Z
    : Expression of COX2 in normal and pyelonephritic kidney, renal intraepithelial neoplasia, and renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 50: 92-97; discussion 97, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 35.
    1. Ristimaki A,
    2. Nieminen O,
    3. Saukkonen K,
    4. Hotakainen K,
    5. Nordling S,
    6. Haglund C
    : Expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 in human transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Am J Pathol 158: 849-853, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 36.↵
    1. Miyata Y,
    2. Koga S,
    3. Kanda S,
    4. Nishikido M,
    5. Hayashi T,
    6. Kanetake H
    : Expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 in renal cell carcinoma: correlation with tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2, and survival. Clin Cancer Res 9: 1741-1749, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 37.↵
    1. Chang CH,
    2. Wu HC,
    3. Ke HL,
    4. Lin HH,
    5. Shen WC,
    6. Sun SS,
    7. Tsai CW,
    8. Tsai RY,
    9. Bau DT
    : The genetic role of cyclo-oxygenase 2 in ureter cancer in Taiwan. Adaptive Medicine 3: 99-105, 2011.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 5
May 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Significant Association of Cyclo-oxygenase 2 Genotypes with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Significant Association of Cyclo-oxygenase 2 Genotypes with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer
WEN-SHIN CHANG, CHENG-HSI LIAO, CHIN-MU HSU, CHUNG-YU HUANG, HSIN-YUAN FANG, PEI-YU KAO, CHIA-WEN TSAI, HSI-CHIN WU, PEI-SHIN HU, TZU-CHIA WANG, YUN-RU SYU, HAO-AI SHUI, DA-TIAN BAU
Anticancer Research May 2015, 35 (5) 2725-2730;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Significant Association of Cyclo-oxygenase 2 Genotypes with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer
WEN-SHIN CHANG, CHENG-HSI LIAO, CHIN-MU HSU, CHUNG-YU HUANG, HSIN-YUAN FANG, PEI-YU KAO, CHIA-WEN TSAI, HSI-CHIN WU, PEI-SHIN HU, TZU-CHIA WANG, YUN-RU SYU, HAO-AI SHUI, DA-TIAN BAU
Anticancer Research May 2015, 35 (5) 2725-2730;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeted Sensitization of Leukemic T-cells to Anticancer Drugs by SIRT1 Agonist SRT-1720
  • Alteration of Flavin Homeostasis in Uterine Cancer
  • Prognostic Significance of PPFIA2 in Localized Prostate Cancer: Integrative Analysis and Functional Validation
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • COX2
  • genotype
  • polymorphism
  • Taiwan
  • upper tract urothelial cancer
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire