Research ArticleClinical Studies

Vitamin D Levels and Dietary Intake Among Patients with Benign Soft Tissue Tumors and Sarcomas

ASTA JUZENIENE, ALINA CARMEN POROJNICU, ZIVILE BATURAITE, ZOYA LAGUNOVA, LAGE AKSNES, ØYVIND SVERRE BRULAND and JOHAN MOAN
Anticancer Research February 2015, 35 (2) 1171-1180;

Abstract

Background: Calcitriol [1,25(OH)2D] is hypothesized to lower the risk of cancer via binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR). VDRs are also found in benign and malignant cells of mesenchymal origin. To our knowledge, vitamin D levels and dietary intake have not been previously evaluated in patients newly diagnosed with benign and malignant mesenchymal tumors. Patients and Methods: Forty-eight patients with benign soft tissue tumors and 25 patients with sarcoma had their serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], 1,25(OH)2D and parathyroid hormone levels measured, vitamin D intake scored and body mass index [BMI] calculated. Results: Vitamin D deficiency [25(OH)D level <50 nmol/l] was observed in 19% and 28% of patients with benign tumor and sarcoma, respectively. Conclusion: Serum 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D and parathyroid hormone concentrations, BMI and daily vitamin D intake did not differ significantly between the two groups of patients. Higher vitamin D intake or UV exposure is needed to ensure that all patients achieve sufficient vitamin D levels.

Sarcomas are an a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal neoplasms, including more than 100 different histotypes, traditionally divided into two main groups: soft tissue and bone sarcomas (1, 2). Sarcoma incidence has been slowly increasing among Scandinavians of both sexes since the 1960s (3, 4). Sarcomas represent only around 1% of all malignancies in adults, but they may be highly aggressive (1, 2, 5, 6). The 5-year survival is around 65% for the most recent period (3, 4). Current therapies are still associated with high rates of recurrence (5-7).

Accumulating evidence from experimental and epidemiological studies suggests that vitamin D deficiency might be a causal risk factor for several types of cancer (colorectal, breast, ovarian), affecting both incidence and mortality (8-12).

Calcitriol, also known as 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D], regulates gene expression and may play a role in cell differentiation and growth, both in vitro and in vivo (13, 14). Many epithelial cell types express vitamin D receptors [VDRs], which, when bound to 1,25(OH)2D, either to promote or suppress gene expression, thereby inducing cell differentiation, inhibiting proliferation, angiogenesis, invasiveness, and metastatic potential, as well as increasing calcitriol degradation (13, 15, 16).

Measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [calcidiol, 25(OH)D] concentration is the best indicator to assess vitamin D status resulting from both sunlight exposure and dietary vitamin D intake over long periods of time (17). Vitamin D and calcitriol have shorter half-lives (24 and 4 h, respectively) compared to three weeks for 25(OH)D, thus making the concentration in serum dependent on the most recent exposure to sunlight and vitamin D ingestion (17). The serum concentration of 1,25(OH)2D is 1,000 times lower than that of 25(OH)D (17). Additionally, the production of 1,25(OH)2D is tightly regulated and stimulated primarily by serum parathyroid hormone [PTH] (17).

VDRs have been found in benign and malignant cells of mesenchymal origin, and 1,25(OH)2D has been shown to have antiproliferative effects in these cells (18, 19). The existence of VDR in benign soft tissue tumors and sarcomas suggests that vitamin D may play a role in the evolution of these diseases. Whether vitamin D is associated with reduced risk of benign soft tissue tumor and sarcoma remains unclear.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Diagram of the study design. 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; 1,25(OH)2D: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D; PTH: parathyroid hormone.

To our knowledge, no study has been published examining the vitamin D status in patients with benign soft tissue tumor or sarcoma. The goal of this study was to determine serum 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D and PTH concentrations and to calculate vitamin D intake in patients newly diagnosed with benign soft tissue tumor or sarcoma.

Materials and Methods

Patients. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Committee (Ref. nr.: 2011/449), and was conducted at the Norwegian Radium Hospital which is a part of Oslo University hospital. Patients were recruited between August 1, 2011 and January 31, 2012. Any patient over 18 years of age with a soft tissue or bone tumor, either suspected as sarcoma or benign soft tissue tumor, regardless of gender or disease type at presentation, was considered eligible for the study. Patients were invited to participate in the study and during the first visit to hospital all patients gave written informed consent before providing a 10 ml blood sample and answering a questionnaire about age, weight, height, skin type, and information about food and dietary supplement intake to obtain estimates of total daily vitamin D intake.

Blood sampling and methods of analyses. Blood was sampled from each patient during the first visit to hospital (between August 1, 2011 and January 31, 2012) prior to any other surgical or medical intervention. Serum was separated from the blood cells by centrifugation and then frozen to −80°C. All serum samples were analyzed in Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. The measurements of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D were performed according to modified versions of the methods described by Aksnes et al. (20-22). The 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D assays were performed by a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometric method (LC/MSD SL; Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, California, USA) and a tandem-LC/MS method (Agilent 6410 Triple Quad LC/MS; Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, California, USA), respectively.

Vitamin D deficiency was defined as a serum 25(OH)D concentration <50 nmol/l, insufficiency as a serum 25(OH)D concentration of 50-75 nmol/l and sufficiency as a serum 25(OH)D concentrations ≥75 nmol/l (23).

Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were measured with an Immulite analyser (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, California, USA) on the basis of a two-site chemiluminescent immunometric assay. The Immulite analyser has a working range of 0.1-263 pmol/l.

Daily vitamin D intake. Daily vitamin D intake from food was computed using information from the questionnaire and the corresponding nutrient values reported in the Norwegian Food Composition Table (24). The questionnaire has previously been validated clinically in Norway (25). Current use, brand, and dosage of multivitamin or vitamin D supplements were recorded in the questionnaires, and daily vitamin D intake from supplements was calculated based on the data from the manufacturer.

Statistical analysis. The data were analyzed using SigmaPlot 12.5 (Systat SoftwareInc., San Jose, California, USA) for Windows. The values of the variables were presented as means±SE (standard error of the mean). The results were compared using unpaired t-tests. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between serum 25(OH)D levels or age and levels of serum PTH and 1,25(OH)2D, daily vitamin D intake and body mass index [BMI]. The associations among serum concentrations of 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D, age, BMI and daily vitamin D intake were examined by using Pearson correlation coefficients. The statistical significance level was set at p<0.05.

Results

A total of 73 patients (41 men and 32 women), aged between 24 and 91 years, were recruited. Based on the diagnosis, patients were divided into two groups (Figure 1): those with sarcoma (N=25) and those with benign soft tissue tumors (N=48). Twenty-three patients with soft tissue sarcoma and two with bone sarcoma participated in the study. Twenty-six (54%) patients with benign tumor and 15 (60%) with sarcoma were males.

View this table:
Table I.

Characteristics of the study groups.

Table I reports patient age, circulating 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D and PTH concentrations, BMI, vitamin D intake from food, supplements and total intake for males and females in both groups. Table II presents p-values for differences in mean values presented in Table I between males and females in the sarcoma or benign soft tissue group and between groups. The mean ages were 49.6 and 54.8 years for males and females with benign tumors respectively, and 57.1 and 73.2 years for males and females with sarcoma, respectively (Table I). Patients with sarcoma were older than patients with benign soft tissue tumors (63.5 versus 52.0 years, respectively, p<0.05) (Table II). Females with sarcoma were the oldest patients (73.2 years, Tables I and II).

There were no significant differences in serum 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D and PTH concentrations, nor in dietary, supplemental or total vitamin D intakes between the two groups (Tables I and II). The mean 25(OH)D concentration was 76.3±4.1 and 64.2±3.8 nmol/l for females and males with sarcoma, respectively, and 73.2±9.5 and 56.1±4.1 nmol/l for females and males with benign tumor, respectively. The only variable other than age that showed significant differences between genders was 25(OH)D concentration, with higher 25(OH)D levels recorded for females with benign tumor (p=0.036, Tables I and II).

View this table:
Table II.

p-Values calculated for differences in mean values (age, 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D, PTH concentrations and vitamin D intakes) given in Table I between males and females in the sarcoma and benign soft tissue group, and between groups by unpaired t-test.

The relationship of age and 25(OH)D with 1,25(OH)2D, PTH, total daily vitamin D intake and BMI was analyzed for both genders together (Figures 2 and 3) because of low numbers of patients in both groups due to the rarity of these types of disease (5,7,26-30).

Nine patients (19%) with benign tumor and seven (28%) with sarcoma had vitamin D deficiency (Figure 2). Vitamin D insufficiency was found in 21 (44%) and 12 (48%) patients and vitamin D sufficiency in 18 (37%) and six (24%) patients with benign tumor and sarcoma, respectively (Figures 2A and 3). A higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was observed in the sarcoma group than in the benign tumor group (19% versus 28%).

Serum 1,25(OH)2D concentrations were in the reference range [47-163 pmol/l (31)] for 97% of the patients in both groups (Figures 2C and 3B). However, the mean serum 1,25(OH)2D level was 16% higher for females compared to males from both groups (p>0.05).

PTH levels were in the normal range (10-65 pg/ml) (32) for 89% of all patients (Figures 2B and 3A). Nevertheless, patients with sarcoma had 30% higher PTH values (p>0.05).

Total intake of vitamin D was similar in both sexes and in both groups (Tables I and II). However, in the benign tumor group, men obtained more vitamin D from food (p=0.013), while women obtained more from supplements (p=0.045). The mean vitamin D intake was 12.4 μg/day (500 IU/day). Equal amounts of vitamin D intake came from food and supplements (Table I). A vitamin D intake of minimum 15 μg/day was required to achieve 25(OH)D levels above 75 nmol/l in both groups (Figure 3C). We observed a tendency for supplemental vitamin D intake, not dietary intake, to correlate positively with 25(OH)D level (Figure 4).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Correlation of age with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] (A), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] (B), parathyroid hormone [PTH] (C), total daily vitamin D intake (D) and body mass index [BMI] (E). Filled circles (solid line) indicate patients with sarcoma, open circles (dashed line) indicate patients with benign soft tissue sarcoma.

The coefficients of correlation between variables are shown in Table III. Among patients with benign tumors, 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D levels correlated negatively with BMI, and daily vitamin D supplement intake was positively associated with total vitamin D intake (Table III). Vitamin D supplements correlated negatively with BMI. Among patients with sarcoma, age, 25(OH)D level and daily supplemental vitamin D intake correlated positively with PTH, 1,25(OH)2D level and total vitamin D intake, respectively (Table III).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Relationship of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] with parathyroid hormone [PTH] (A), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] (B) total daily vitamin D intake (C) and body mass index [BMI] (D). Filled circles indicate patients with sarcoma (solid line), open circles indicate patients with benign soft tissue sarcoma (dashed line).

Blood samples were collected between August 1, 2011 and January 31, 2012. In August and September, 25(OH)D values were around 16 nmol/l (25%) higher than in other months in both groups of patients, but no statistical significance was found (Figure 5A). Monthly variations of serum 1,25(OH)2D and PTH concentrations were not observed (Figure 5B and C).

Discussion

Epidemiological studies reveal a relationship between insufficient 25(OH)D levels and increased risk of some types of cancer (9, 33-38). This may also be of importance in benign soft tissue tumors and sarcoma. There exist experimental evidence supporting the existence of VDR in both benign and malignant cells of mesenchymal origin, and 1,25(OH)2D has been shown to have antiproliferative effects in such cells (18, 19).

Despite a clear histogenetical relationship, sarcomas are, by definition, the malignant part of soft tissue or bone tumors. If vitamin D plays a role in their prevention, we would expect to find lower vitamin D values in the sarcoma group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in serum 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)D and PTH concentrations, nor in supplemental or dietary vitamin D intakes between patients with sarcoma and those with benign tumors (Table II). We further compared our results for vitamin D status in the general healthy Caucasian population living in Norway. Healthy Norwegians had similar 25(OH)D values (around 50-74 nmol/l) (39-44) to patients with sarcoma and benign soft tissue tumors (Table I). The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency [serum 25(OH)D levels lower than 50 nmol/l] are also similar in all groups: 14-41% in healthy Norwegians (39, 40, 43-45), 19% among patients with benign tumor and 28% among patients with sarcoma.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Relationship of dietary (filled circles; solid line) and supplemental (open circles; dashed line) vitamin D intake with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in patients with sarcoma (A) and with benign soft tissue tumors (B).

However, the mean serum 1,25(OH)2D concentration seem to be slightly lower in patients than in the healthy population: 90 pmol/l in the sarcoma group and 100 pmol/l in the benign tumor group (Table I) versus around 120 pmol/l in healthy persons (19, 40-42, 44).

The present study has several limitations. Firstly, only few patients were included due to the rarity of disease (1, 5). Even if benign soft tissue tumors are diagnosed almost 100-fold more often than soft tissue sarcomas (28), only 48 patients with benign tumors (~50% more than patients with sarcoma, Table I) participated in the study.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Distribution of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] (A), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] (B) and parathyroid hormone [PTH] (C) values by month in the patients from both groups and both sexes. The bottom of the box represents the 25th percentile, the dashed line represents the mean, the solid line represents the median, the top of the box represents the 75th percentile, and the whiskers represent the 5th and 95th percentiles; N is the number of patients.

Secondly, due to the low numbers, the obtained data were not adjusted for season, age, gender, BMI, recent holidays to southern countries, regular solarium visits (one person reported the use of sunbeds), exposure to sun when outdoors, sunscreen use, skin pigmentation, etc. Many studies report a significant seasonal variation of 25 (OH)D levels due to ultraviolet B (280-315 nm) exposure with the highest concentrations of 25(OH) observed in July to September (41,44,46). Our patients also had slightly higher levels in August and September than in later months (Figure 5). Regular dietary and supplemental vitamin D intake may lower seasonal fluctuations of 25(OH)D (43,47-49). The mean levels of 25(OH)D in our study and in Norway are within the range of means found in Denmark and Sweden (22, 43, 44, 47, 48, 50, 51). However, the levels are higher than those reported from Germany, Belgium, Italy and Spain even though UV exposure levels are higher in these countries (52-54). This indicates a relatively high vitamin D intake in the Scandinavian population. The official recommended dose of vitamin D intake in Norway is 10 μg/day (400 IU/day) for adults, but only around 40% of our patients achieved this level (Figure 4). The upper tolerable limit of vitamin D intake (the dose that does not pose any risk of hypercalcaemia/hypercalciuria) for adults is 50 μg/day (2000 IU/day) (55, 56). Many researchers suggest that the daily recommended and upper tolerable vitamin D intake is too low to achieve a sufficient vitamin D level in the general population (55-57). Actual toxicity is not seen below serum 25(OH)D values of 250 nmol/l, a value that would be reached only with regular intakes of 250 μg/day (10000 IU/day) (55-57). The recommendations for a daily intake of 50 μg/day (2000 IU/day) are proposed to achieve 25(OH)D level above 75 nmol/l (55-57).

View this table:
Table III.

Pearson's correlation coefficients between age (years) and serum 25(OH)D (nmol/l), 1,25(OH)2D (pmol/l), PTH (pg/ml), vitamin D intake (μg/day), and BMI (kg/m2) in patients with benign soft tissue tumor and in those with sarcoma.

Higher concentrations of 25(OH)D and lower 1,25(OH)2D and PTH levels are usually observed in older (>50 years) rather than younger (<50 years) persons in Norway (41, 44). However, in many other countries, older persons have much lower concentrations of 25(OH)D (58-60). We have observed the tendency that 25(OH)D level increases with age in both groups (Figure 2A), PTH levels increased only in the sarcoma group (Figure 2B) while 1,25(OH)2D levels were stable (Figure 2C). The increase of 25(OH)D level with age can be explained by the likely possibility that older persons have slightly higher intakes of vitamin D (Figure 2D), and that vitamin D intake correlates to some extent with serum 25(OH)D level (Figure 3C).

Persons with higher BMI have lower levels of 25(OH)D (41, 46, 61). We observed a similar trend in patients with benign tumor but not in patients with sarcoma (Figure 3B). Additionally, vitamin D supplement intake correlated negatively with BMI (Table III) and weight (data not shown) in patients with benign tumor, which supports recent findings that higher vitamin D intake may be associated with lower body weight (62). The reasons for these discrepancies between the two groups may be related to a lower number of patients in the sarcoma group. Exposure to UV radiation from sun or artificial sources, sunscreen use and skin pigmentation influence vitamin D levels (63), but these factors were not taken into account in the present study.

A third limitation is that the patients were from different regions in Norway, which extends over 13 degrees of latitude, from 58 to 71 degrees north. UV level decreases with increasing latitude. The annual UV exposure is approximately 60% higher at 56°N than at 70°N (64).

A fourth limitation is that vitamin D intake was determined through a self-report, which increases the possibility of inaccuracies.

Conclusion

Patients with sarcoma and benign tumors have similar 25(OH)D levels to healthy persons in Norway. The proportions of patients with 25(OH)D concentrations below 50 nmol/l were 28% and 19% in the sarcoma and benign soft tissue tumor group, respectively. More patients with benign soft tissue tumors had sufficient vitamin D levels than did patients with sarcoma (48% versus 24%). Vitamin D intake from food and supplements was similar in both groups (12.4 μg/day). Higher vitamin D intake or UV exposure is required to ensure that all patients achieve sufficient vitamin D levels.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by The Research Foundation of The Norwegian Radium Hospital, The Norwegian Cancer Society and South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority. We thank Dr. Ole-Jacob Norum and Dr. Olga Zaikova at the Surgery Clinic, The Norwegian Radium Hospital for facilitating recruitment of the patients.

  • Received June 10, 2014.
  • Revision received July 18, 2014.
  • Accepted July 22, 2014.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Skubitz KM,
    2. D'Adamo DR
    : Sarcoma. Mayo Clin Proc 82: 1409-1432, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bridge JA
    : The role of cytogenetics and molecular diagnostics in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumors. Mod Pathol 27(Suppl 1): S80-S97, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bray F,
    2. Engholm G,
    3. Hakulinen T,
    4. Gislum M,
    5. Tryggvadottir L,
    6. Storm HH,
    7. Klint A
    : Trends in survival of patients diagnosed with cancers of the brain and nervous system, thyroid, eye, bone, and soft tissues in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up until the end of 2006. Acta Oncol 49: 673-693, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Engholm G,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Christensen N,
    4. Johannesen TB,
    5. Klint A,
    6. Køtlum JE
    : NORDCAN: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in the Nordic Countries, Version 5.1. Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries Version 5.1, http://www.ancr.nu/ 2012 (last accessed 27 March 2014).
  5. ↵
    1. Goldberg BR
    : Soft tissue sarcoma: An overview. Orthop Nurs 26: 4-11, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ray-Coquard I,
    2. Le Cesne A
    : A role for maintenance therapy in managing sarcoma. Cancer Treat Rev 38: 368-378, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Cormier JN,
    2. Pollock RE
    : Soft tissue sarcomas. CA Cancer J Clin 54: 94-109, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Garland CF,
    2. Gorham ED,
    3. Mohr SB,
    4. Garland FC
    : Vitamin D for cancer prevention: global perspective. Ann Epidemiol 19: 468-483, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chen P,
    2. Li M,
    3. Gu X,
    4. Liu Y,
    5. Li X,
    6. Li C,
    7. Wang Y,
    8. Xie D,
    9. Wang F,
    10. Yu C,
    11. Li J,
    12. Chen X,
    13. Chu R,
    14. Zhu J,
    15. Ou Z,
    16. Wang H
    : Higher blood 25(OH)D level may reduce the breast cancer risk: evidence from a Chinese population based case–control study and meta-analysis of the observational studies. PLoS One 8: e49312, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Maalmi H,
    2. Ordonez-Mena JM,
    3. Schottker B,
    4. Brenner H
    : Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and survival in colorectal and breast cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Cancer 50: 1510-1521, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mohr SB,
    2. Gorham ED,
    3. Kim J,
    4. Hofflich H,
    5. Garland CF
    : Meta-analysis of vitamin D sufficiency for improving survival of patients with breast cancer. Anticancer Res 34: 1163-1166, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Pilz S,
    2. Kienreich K,
    3. Tomaschitz A,
    4. Ritz E,
    5. Lerchbaum E,
    6. Obermayer-Pietsch B,
    7. Matzi V,
    8. Lindenmann J,
    9. Marz W,
    10. Gandini S,
    11. Dekker JM
    : Vitamin D and cancer mortality: systematic review of prospective epidemiological studies. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 13: 107-117, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Welsh J
    : Cellular and molecular effects of vitamin D on carcinogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys 523: 107-114, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Fleet JC,
    2. DeSmet M,
    3. Johnson R,
    4. Li Y
    : Vitamin D and cancer: a review of molecular mechanisms. Biochem J 441: 61-76, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. King AN,
    2. Beer DG,
    3. Christensen PJ,
    4. Simpson RU,
    5. Ramnath N
    : The vitamin D/CYP24A1 story in cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 10: 213-224, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Chakraborti CK
    : Vitamin D as a promising anticancer agent. Indian J Pharmacol 43: 113-120, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Zerwekh JE
    : Blood biomarkers of vitamin D status. Am J Clin Nutr 87: 1087S-1091S, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Shabahang M,
    2. Buffan AE,
    3. Nolla JM,
    4. Schumaker LM,
    5. Brenner RV,
    6. Buras RR,
    7. Nauta RJ,
    8. Evans SR
    : The effect of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the growth of soft-tissue sarcoma cells as mediated by the vitamin D receptor. Ann Surg Oncol 3: 144-149, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Chattopadhyay N,
    2. MacLeod RJ,
    3. Tfelt-Hansen J,
    4. Brown EM
    : 1α,25(OH)2-Vitamin D3 inhibits HGF synthesis and secretion from MG-63 human osteosarcoma cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284: E219-E227, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Aksnes L
    : Quantitation of the main metabolites of vitamin D in a single serum sample. I. Extraction, separation and purification of metabolites. Clin Chim Acta 104: 133-146, 1980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Aksnes L
    : Quantitation of the main metabolites of vitamin D in a single serum sample. II. Determination by UV-absorption and competitive protein-binding assays. Clin Chim Acta 104: 147-159, 1980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Brustad M,
    2. Sandanger T,
    3. Aksnes L,
    4. Lund E
    : Vitamin D status in a rural population of northern Norway with high fish liver consumption. Public Health Nutr 7: 783-789, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Holick MF
    : Vitamin D: a D-Lightful health perspective. Nutr Rev 66: S182-S194, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Mattilsynet
    . Matvaretabellen 2014. Helsedirektoratet og Universitetet i Oslo. www.matvaretabellen.no 2014 (last accessed 15 February 2014).
  25. ↵
    1. Brustad M,
    2. Alsaker E,
    3. Engelsen O,
    4. Aksnes L,
    5. Lund E
    : Vitamin D status of middle-aged women at 65-71 degrees N in relation to dietary intake and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Public Health Nutr 7: 327-335, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Burningham Z,
    2. Hashibe M,
    3. Spector L,
    4. Schiffman JD
    : The epidemiology of sarcoma. Clin Sarcoma Res 2: 14, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Ng VY,
    2. Scharschmidt TJ,
    3. Mayerson JL,
    4. Fisher JL
    : Incidence and survival in sarcoma in the United States: a focus on musculoskeletal lesions. Anticancer Res 33: 2597-2604, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Hajdu SI
    : Benign soft tissue tumors: classification and natural history. CA Cancer J Clin 37: 66-76, 1987.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kransdorf MJ
    : Benign soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of specific diagnoses by age, sex, and location. Am J Roentgenol 164: 395-402, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Frassica FJ,
    2. Thompson RC Jr..
    : Evaluation, diagnosis, and classification of benign soft-tissue tumors. Instr Course Lect 45: 447-460, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Clive DR,
    2. Sudhaker D,
    3. Giacherio D,
    4. Gupta M,
    5. Schreiber MJ,
    6. Sackrison JL,
    7. MacFarlane GD
    : Analytical and clinical validation of a radioimmunoassay for the measurement of 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D. Clin Biochem 35: 517-521, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Raimundo M,
    2. Crichton S,
    3. Lei K,
    4. Sanderson B,
    5. Smith J,
    6. Brooks J,
    7. Ng J,
    8. Lemmich SJ,
    9. McKenzie C,
    10. Beale R,
    11. Dickie H,
    12. Ostermann M
    : Maintaining normal levels of ionized calcium during citrate-based renal replacement therapy is associated with stable parathyroid hormone levels. Nephron Clin Pract 124: 124-131, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Wei MY,
    2. Garland CF,
    3. Gorham ED,
    4. Mohr SB,
    5. Giovannucci E
    : Vitamin D and prevention of colorectal adenoma: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17: 2958-2969, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Yin L,
    2. Grandi N,
    3. Raum E,
    4. Haug U,
    5. Arndt V,
    6. Brenner H
    : Meta-analysis: serum vitamin D and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer 46: 2196-2205, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lee JE,
    2. Li H,
    3. Chan AT,
    4. Hollis BW,
    5. Lee IM,
    6. Stampfer MJ,
    7. Wu K,
    8. Giovannucci E,
    9. Ma J
    : Circulating levels of vitamin D and colon and rectal cancer: the Physicians' Health Study and a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Cancer Prev Res 4: 735-743, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ma Y,
    2. Zhang P,
    3. Wang F,
    4. Yang J,
    5. Liu Z,
    6. Qin H
    : Association between vitamin D and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. J Clin Oncol 29: 3775-3782, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Yin L,
    2. Grandi N,
    3. Raum E,
    4. Haug U,
    5. Arndt V,
    6. Brenner H
    : Meta-analysis: Circulating vitamin D and ovarian cancer risk. Gynecol Oncol 121: 369-375, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Fedirko V,
    2. Duarte-Salles T,
    3. Bamia C,
    4. Trichopoulou A,
    5. Aleksandrova K,
    6. Trichopoulos D,
    7. Trepo E,
    8. Tjonneland A,
    9. Olsen A,
    10. Overvad K,
    11. Boutron-Ruault MC,
    12. Clavel-Chapelon F,
    13. Kvaskoff M,
    14. Kuhn T,
    15. Lukanova A,
    16. Boeing H,
    17. Buijsse B,
    18. Klinaki E,
    19. Tsimakidi C,
    20. Naccarati A,
    21. Tagliabue G,
    22. Panico S,
    23. Tumino R,
    24. Palli D,
    25. Bueno-de-Mesquita HB,
    26. Siersema PD,
    27. Peters PH,
    28. Lund E,
    29. Brustad M,
    30. Standahl OK,
    31. Weiderpass VE,
    32. Zamora R,
    33. Sanchez MJ,
    34. Ardanaz E,
    35. Amiano P,
    36. Navarro C,
    37. Quiros JR,
    38. Werner M,
    39. Sund M,
    40. Lindkvist B,
    41. Malm J,
    42. Travis RC,
    43. Khaw KT,
    44. Stepien M,
    45. Scalbert A,
    46. Romieu I,
    47. Lagiou P,
    48. Riboli E,
    49. Jenab M
    : Pre-diagnostic circulating vitamin D levels and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in European populations: A nested case–control study. Hepatology doi: 10.1002/hep.27079, 2014.
  39. ↵
    1. Meyer HE,
    2. Falch JA,
    3. Sogaard AJ,
    4. Haug E
    : Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism and the association with bone mineral density in persons with Pakistani and Norwegian background living in Oslo, Norway, The Oslo Health Study. Bone 35: 412-417, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Holvik K,
    2. Meyer HE,
    3. Sogaard AJ,
    4. Haug E,
    5. Falch JA
    : Pakistanis living in Oslo have lower serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels but higher serum ionized calcium levels compared with ethnic Norwegians. The Oslo Health Study. BMC Endocr Disord 7: 9, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Lagunova Z,
    2. Porojnicu AC,
    3. Vieth R,
    4. Lindberg FA,
    5. Hexeberg S,
    6. Moan J
    : Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is a predictor of serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in overweight and obese patients. J Nutr 141: 112-117, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Moen SM,
    2. Celius EG,
    3. Sandvik L,
    4. Brustad M,
    5. Nordsletten L,
    6. Eriksen EF,
    7. Holmoy T
    : Bone turnover and metabolism in patients with early multiple sclerosis and prevalent bone mass deficit: a population-based case–control study. PLoS One 7: e45703, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Lagunova Z,
    2. Porojnicu AC,
    3. Aksnes L,
    4. Holick MF,
    5. Iani V,
    6. Bruland OS,
    7. Moan J
    : Effect of vitamin D supplementation and ultraviolet B exposure on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in healthy volunteers: a randomized, crossover clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 169: 434-440, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Christensen MH,
    2. Lien EA,
    3. Hustad S,
    4. Almas B
    : Seasonal and age-related differences in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone in patients from Western Norway. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 70: 281-286, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Orlova T,
    2. Moan J,
    3. Lagunova Z,
    4. Aksnes L,
    5. Terenetskaya I,
    6. Juzeniene A
    : Increase in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3 in humans after sunbed exposures compared to previtamin D3 synthesis in vitro. J Photochem Photobiol B 122: 32-36, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Lagunova Z,
    2. Porojnicu AC,
    3. Lindberg F,
    4. Hexeberg S,
    5. Moan J
    : The dependency of vitamin D status on body mass index, gender, age and season. Anticancer Res 29: 3713-3720, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Lund B,
    2. Sorensen OH
    : Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum and its relation to sunshine, age and vitamin D intake in the Danish population. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 39: 23-30, 1979.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Brustad M,
    2. Edvardsen K,
    3. Wilsgaard T,
    4. Engelsen O,
    5. Aksnes L,
    6. Lund E
    : Seasonality of UV-radiation and vitamin D status at 69 degrees north. Photochem Photobiol Sci 6: 903-908, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Gozdzik A,
    2. Barta JL,
    3. Weir A,
    4. Cole DE,
    5. Vieth R,
    6. Whiting SJ,
    7. Parra EJ
    : Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations fluctuate seasonally in young adults of diverse ancestry living in Toronto. J Nutr 140: 2213-2220, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Madsen KH,
    2. Rasmussen LB,
    3. Andersen R,
    4. Molgaard C,
    5. Jakobsen J,
    6. Bjerrum PJ,
    7. Andersen EW,
    8. Mejborn H,
    9. Tetens I
    : Randomized controlled trial of the effects of vitamin D-fortified milk and bread on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in families in Denmark during winter: the VitmaD study. Am J Clin Nutr 98: 374-382, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Hedlund L,
    2. Brembeck P,
    3. Olausson H
    : Determinants of vitamin D status in fair-skinned women of childbearing age at northern latitudes. PLoS One 8: e60864, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Lips P
    : Vitamin D status and nutrition in Europe and Asia. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 103: 620-625, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ringe JD,
    2. Kipshoven C
    : Vitamin D-insufficiency: An estimate of the situation in Germany. Dermatoendocrinol 4: 72-80, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Cavalier E,
    2. Fache W,
    3. Souberbielle JC
    : A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel study of vitamin D3 supplementation with different schemes based on multiples of 25,000 IU doses. Int J Endocrinol 2013: Article ID 327265, 2013.
  55. ↵
    1. Heaney RP
    : The vitamin D requirement in health and disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 97: 13-19, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Vieth R
    : Critique of the considerations for establishing the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D: critical need for revision upwards. J Nutr 136: 1117-1122, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Bouillon R,
    2. Van Schoor NM,
    3. Gielen E,
    4. Boonen S,
    5. Mathieu C,
    6. Vanderschueren D,
    7. Lips P
    : Optimal vitamin D status: a critical analysis on the basis of evidence-based medicine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: E1283-E1304, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Cutillas-Marco E,
    2. Prosper AF,
    3. Grant WB,
    4. Morales-Suarez-Varela MM
    : Vitamin D status and hypercholesterolemia in Spanish general population. Dermatoendocrinol 5: 358-362, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Valcour A,
    2. Blocki F,
    3. Hawkins DM,
    4. Rao SD
    : Effects of age and serum 25-OH-vitamin D on serum parathyroid hormone levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: 3989-3995, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Adami S,
    2. Viapiana O,
    3. Gatti D,
    4. Idolazzi L,
    5. Rossini M
    : Relationship between serum parathyroid hormone, vitamin D sufficiency, age, and calcium intake. Bone 42: 267-270, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Thuesen B,
    2. Husemoen L,
    3. Fenger M,
    4. Jakobsen J,
    5. Schwarz P,
    6. Toft U,
    7. Ovesen L,
    8. Jorgensen T,
    9. Linneberg A
    : Determinants of vitamin D status in a general population of Danish adults. Bone 50: 605-610, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Zhu W,
    2. Cai D,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Lin N,
    5. Hu Q,
    6. Qi Y,
    7. Ma S,
    8. Amarasekara S
    : Calcium plus vitamin D3 supplementation facilitated fat loss in overweight and obese college students with very-low calcium consumption: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J 12: 8, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Wacker M,
    2. Holick MF
    : Sunlight and vitamin D: A global perspective for health. Dermatoendocrinol 5: 51-108, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Porojnicu AC,
    2. Robsahm TE,
    3. Dahlback A,
    4. Berg JP,
    5. Christiani D,
    6. Bruland OS,
    7. Moan J
    : Seasonal and geographical variations in lung cancer prognosis in Norway. Does vitamin D from the sun play a role? Lung Cancer 55: 263-270, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Reprints and Permissions
Vitamin D Levels and Dietary Intake Among Patients with Benign Soft Tissue Tumors and Sarcomas
ASTA JUZENIENE, ALINA CARMEN POROJNICU, ZIVILE BATURAITE, ZOYA LAGUNOVA, LAGE AKSNES, ØYVIND SVERRE BRULAND, JOHAN MOAN
Anticancer Research Feb 2015, 35 (2) 1171-1180;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords