Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Detection of Bone Metastases Using 11C-Acetate PET in Patients with Prostate Cancer with Biochemical Recurrence

CLAUDIO SPICK, STEPHAN H. POLANEC, MARKUS MITTERHAUSER, WOLFGANG WADSAK, PHILIP ANNER, BETTINA REITERITS, ALEXANDER R. HAUG, MARCUS HACKER, MOHSEN BEHESHTI and GEORGIOS KARANIKAS
Anticancer Research December 2015, 35 (12) 6787-6791;
CLAUDIO SPICK
1Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEPHAN H. POLANEC
1Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARKUS MITTERHAUSER
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WOLFGANG WADSAK
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PHILIP ANNER
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BETTINA REITERITS
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALEXANDER R. HAUG
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARCUS HACKER
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MOHSEN BEHESHTI
3PET-CT Center Linz, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Linz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORGIOS KARANIKAS
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: georgios.karanikas{at}meduniwien.ac.at
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Errata - February 01, 2016

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET) in the detection of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence. Patients and Methods: Ninety patients (100%) with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (>0.2 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy, who had both 11C-acetate PET and bone scan performed and who had clinical follow-up/imaging follow-up for bone metastasis, considered a gold standard, were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for 11C-acetate PET were calculated on a per-patient basis. Results: 11C-Acetate PET and 99mTc-dicarboxypropane-diphosphonate findings were concordant in 84 (93.3%) patients [35 (38.9%) true-positive, 49 (54.4%) true-negative]. Discordant findings were observed in six patients (6.7%). 11C-Acetate PET presented two (2.2%) false-positive and four (4.4%) false-negative findings. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for 11C-acetate PET were 89.7%, 96.1%, 94.6%, and 92.2%, respectively. The median PSA of patients with multiple skeletal metastases (median=23.64 ng/ml, range=3.16-551.1 ng/ml) differed significantly (p=0.018) from that of patients with focal metastases (median=6.7 ng/ml, range=0.31-12.8 ng/ml). Conclusion: 11C-Acetate PET is a useful tool for patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence, as it can depict multiple sites of recurrence and in particularly shows a high diagnostic value equivalent to that of bone scan for the detection of bone metastases.

  • Bone metastases
  • PET
  • acelate
  • prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of death in men in Western countries (1). Recurrent disease may occur in up to 50% of patients within 10 years after prostatectomy. Therefore, early and accurate detection of the site of recurrence is of the utmost importance for patient management, selection of therapy, and estimation of patient prognosis. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is an established biochemical marker for the assessment of recurrent disease (2, 3). However, it cannot reveal the site of disease, which is of key value in the determination of the treatment. Local therapeutic approaches can be performed in cases of recurrent disease in the locoregional pelvic lymph nodes and prostatic bed, while systemic therapy is required for distant metastatic spread. Approximately 90% of patients who die of prostate cancer present with bone metastases (4). Furthermore, the extent of metastatic bone disease is an independent prognostic factor (5).

In clinical practice, bone scintigraphy (BS) is a widely used, low-cost clinical examination that can demonstrate skeletal involvement due to osteoblastic bone remodeling. BS has high sensitivity but suffers from limited specificity due to non-specific tracer uptake in regions of inflammation, degeneration, and trauma. Its specificity has, however, been improved with the introduction of SPECT/CT imaging (6, 7).

Currently, several tracers for positron-emission tomography (PET) are in use for the assessment of prostate cancer (8-11). These various metabolic and receptor-based PET probes showed promising results in the detection of recurrent disease, as well as in the early detection of bone marrow metastases (8-11). However, their value in the detection of osteoblastic bone metastases, especially in dense sclerotic lesions, is still controversial (12).

In prostate neoplasms, prostate epithelial cells undergo a metabolic transformation from being citrate-producing normal cells to citrate-oxidizing malignant cells. Malignant cells overexpress the enzyme fatty acid synthase, which carries out the rate-limiting step in the metabolic conversion of acetate into (membrane) lipid pools (13, 14). Thus, 11C-acetate PET has been introduced to assess prostate cancer in primary staging, restaging, and localization of recurrent disease, and serves as a valid alternative to choline imaging (14-19). However, the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-acetate PET specifically for the detection of skeletal involvement, by means of metastatic prostate cancer cells, has not been studied extensively.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-acetate PET in the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence, and compare it to results of 99mTc-biphosphonate bone imaging.

Patients and Methods

Patient selection. This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional Review Board (2022/2013) and informed consent was waived. Overall, 90 patients with prostate cancer were included for data analysis based on medical reports. The inclusion criteria were: (i) rising PSA levels (>0.2 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy; (ii) both 11C-acetate PET and BS performed within a maximum interval of 3 months (range=0-96±29 days); (iii) clinical follow-up and imaging follow-up, which was considered the gold standard, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), BS, and PET for at least 6 months in order to validate concordant or discordant findings between the two imaging modalities.

Image acquisition protocol. PET: 11C-Acetate was prepared as described in detail by Mitterhauser et al. (20). 11C-Acetate PET scans were obtained with a dedicated PET system (GE Advance; General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA), and covered an axial field of view of 15.2 cm. For the attenuation correction, a transmission scan was performed with standard source of 11Ge. Whole-body emission scans were acquired after intravenous injection of 740 MBq 11C-acetate (five bed positions, 5 minutes per bed position) from the mid-thigh to the head at approximately 15 minutes after tracer injection.

Attenuation-corrected scan data were reconstructed as filtered back-projection images using a Hanning filter with a cut-off of 12, as well as iterative algorithms, and were reformatted in the coronal, transaxial, and sagittal planes for interpretation of the data.

Normal 11C-acetate distribution is defined by physiological tracer uptake in the upper abdominal parenchymatous organs (liver, spleen, and pancreas) and by minor uptake in muscles, intestines, and renal parenchyma. Increased tracer uptake higher than physiological background activity was interpreted as being pathologic. Pathological lesions on 11C-acetate PET were classified as local recurrence (LR), lymph node metastases (LNM), and distant metastases (i.e. organ or bone).

Whole-body bone scan: Whole-body BS was performed in all patients 3 hours after the intravenous administration of 740 MBq 99mTechnetium-dicarboxypropane diphosphonate (99mTc DPD). Anterior and posterior whole-body images were obtained using a double-headed, large-field-of-view gamma camera (GCA 901A; Toshiba Corp., New York, NY, USA) equipped with low-energy, parallel Id-hole, and high-resolution collimators at a scan speed of 15 cm/min, such that approximately 1000 k counts were accumulated per image and stored in a 256×1024 matrix. Malignant lesions were defined based on standard criteria, using the pattern and localization of tracer uptake.

Data analysis. During the study period, imaging was performed by clinical routine and reported by several nuclear medicine physicians. Data were obtained from these reports. No imaging review was performed. According to the gold standard (clinical follow-up and imaging follow-up, cf. inclusion criteria), all 11C-acetate PET and BS findings – on perpatient-based analysis - could be definitively categorized as either positively concordant (true positive, TP), negatively concordant (false positive, FP), positively discordant (false negative, FN), or negatively discordant (true negative, TN) for skeletal involvement.

11C-Acetate PET findings were considered TP when both modalities revealed skeletal involvement and were confirmed by follow-up. FP results were those presenting positive findings on 11C-acetate PET without confirmation on BS and follow-up. FN results occurred when lesions undetected by 11C-acetate PET were documented as neoplastic at BS and follow-up. Findings of negative 11C-acetate PET were considered TN when the absence of skeletal metastasis at BS and follow-up were documented.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for 11C-acetate PET were calculated on a per-patient basis using the standard of reference. In order to compare the PSA of patients with multiple and focal bone metastases, the exact version of the Mann-Whitney U-test was used.

Results

Between January 2001 and January 2013, 90 (100%) consecutive patients (mean age=64±12 years) fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in this retrospective single-center study. All patients presented with biochemical recurrence (PSA relapse >0.2 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy. Exact serum PSA levels were available for 48 (53.3%) patients (mean=41.8 ng/ml, range=0.3-551.1 ng/ml).

11C-Acetate uptake was considered positive for bone metastasis in 37 (41.1%) patients. There were 25 (27.8%) patients with multifocal and 12 (13.3%) with single-focal 11C-acetate bone uptake.

With regard to BS, 39 (43.3%) patients were considered positive for skeletal metastasis. Of 39 patients, 15 (16.7%) had a single focus of bone uptake, whereas 24 (30%) exhibited multifocal bone uptake. The remaining 51 (56.7%) patients were considered negative for bone metastasis. Sensitivity and specificity were 100% for BS.

11C-Acetate and BS findings were concordant in 84 (93.3%) patients [35 (38.9%) TP and 49 (54.4%) TN] (Figures 1 and 2).

Discordant findings were observed in six patients (6.7%). Based on the standard of reference, 11C-Acetate presented two (2.2%) FP and four (4.4%) FN findings. As a consequence, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for 11C-acetate PET were 89.7%, 96.1%, 94.6%, and 92.2%, respectively.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

11C-Acetate positron-emission tomographic images (coronal A, sagittal B) show, in addition to the physiological accumulation in the liver and spleen, abnormal radiotracer uptake in multiple vertebrae.

The median PSA of patients with multiple skeletal metastases (median=23.64 ng/ml, range=3.16-551.1 ng/ml) differed significantly (p=0.018) from that of patients with focal metastases (median=6.7 ng/ml, range=0.31-12.8 ng/ml).

Finally, in our study population, uptake of 11C-acetate was positive in 55 (61.1%) patients. In addition to their bone metastases, 21 (23.3%) patients presented positive tracer uptake in the lymph nodes and 13 (14.4%) in the prostatic bed, thus depicting lymph node metastases and local recurrence, respectively. Thirteen (14.4%) patients with lymph nodes metastases and seven (7.8%) patients with recurrence in the prostatic bed did not have any bone metastasis (TN and concordant with BS).

Discussion

Previous studies have reported the ability of various metabolic and receptor-based PET probes, such as choline (11C, 18F), 11C-acetate and 68G-prostate-specific membrane antigen, to detect morphological correlates of PSA progression in patients with prostate cancer recurrence (2, 11).

In general, only a small number of studies in the past had shown that 11C-acetate PET is able to detect local recurrence and bone metastases in patients with PSA progression (15, 16). Consequently, no definitive strategy is available, and it is unclear which tracer is preferable for the evaluation of recurrent disease that includes bone involvement. Therefore, the motivation for our study was to provide results for the clinical usefulness of 11C-acetate in patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence that includes skeletal involvement.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Concordant abnormal accumulation of 99mTc-DPD in the posterior image of bone scan in the same patient as Figure 1.

Previously, Oyama et al. studied 22 patients with prostate cancer using 11C-acetate PET for the initial staging. Seven out of 22 patients presented with bone metastases confirmed by conventional imaging. Findings for six of these patients were positive on the 11C-acetate PET scan (15). Fricke et al. investigated 25 patients in the follow-up of primary prostate cancer, revealing eight patients with distant metastases. 11C-Acetate PET detected the metastases in half of these patients (14). Kotzerke et al. investigated 31 patients who had increasing PSA levels, or a suspicious transrectal ultrasound following complete prostatectomy, with 11C-acetate PET. In five patients, 11C-acetate uptake within the bone was detected, and conventional BS confirmed the focal acetate uptake in the skeleton to be typical metastases (16). For the detection of bone metastasis by 11C-acetate PET, the results mentioned above are insufficient for a final conclusion due to the small number of studies available, the types of patients investigated, the patients who presented with bone metastasis, as well as the heterogeneity of the reference standard.

Our study included 90 patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence in whom 11C-acetate PET revealed a very high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the detection of skeletal involvement. Due to the fact that prostate cancer cells have an increased turnover of acetate, 11C -acetate accumulation in bones reflects primarily metastases. However, in our study, we had two FP results, both showing uptake in multiple vertebrae on the acetate scans but which were negative on BS. Follow-up did not reveal any metastasis in these patients. However, major degenerative changes were observed. This observation is in accordance with the recently published bio-distribution pattern of 11C-acetate (21).

Furthermore, there were four negative discordant results where 11C-acetate PET did not reveal any tracer uptake. Each of these patients had a focal lesion on BS that was also present in the follow-up. For two of these patients (focal sternal and femoral lesion, respectively), accurate PSA levels were available, which were low (4.8 and 5.6 ng/ml). Nevertheless, 11C-acetate PET revealed findings that were concordant with bone scintigraphy in 35 (38.9%) TP and 49 (54.4%) TN cases.

With regard to the recurrence of prostate cancer, most patients initially demonstrate a serum PSA relapse. Therefore, it is important to detect the morphological correlates of biochemical recurrence. It has been shown that sensitivity is dependent on the level of serum PSA. Previous studies reported a detection rate, by means of positive tracer-uptake, of 59-68% for 11C-acetate PET scans (14, 19). These numbers are similar to our findings in demonstrating (the potential site of) recurrence in 61.1% (55 out of 90) patients.

The limitations of our study were its retrospective study design and the fact that exact PSA values were unavailable for almost half of the patients. This was due to the fact that most of our study patients were outpatients referred to our Department for further evaluation. However, we were able establish that the median PSA of patients with multiple skeletal metastases differed significantly from that of patients with focal metastases. Furthermore, like most previous studies, we were unable to provide data on the diagnostic accuracy for lymph node metastasis and local recurrence due to a lack of a standard of reference. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, our study presents the highest number of patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence in whom 11C-acetate PET revealed a very high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the detection of skeletal involvement. The retrospective design of the study did not allow a per-lesion-based analysis, which would in fact not influence the suitable therapeutical approaches of these patients. The fact that pelvic recurrence (lymph nodes/local recurrence) without bone metastases were detected by 11C-acetate in 20 patients highlights the usefulness of this tracer for the therapeutical management of patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence.

In summary, our study provides data that 11C-acetate PET has a high diagnostic value for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence; nevertheless, 11C-acetate was, in essence, equivalent to BS on a per-patient analysis. Consequently, while 99mTc-biphosphonate BS remains the first-line clinical imaging protocol following biochemical evidence of prostate cancer recurrence, our study suggests that the same results could be achieved with 11C-acetate PET, where this modality is available. Since 11C-acetate will also detect regional and distant soft-tissue metastases, 99mTc-biphosphonate BS might be unnecessary.

In conclusion, 11C-acetate PET is a useful tool for patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence, as it depicts multiple sites of recurrence.

Acknowledgements

Study design: CS and GK. Study conduct: CS and GK. Data collection: CS, SHP, MM, WW, PA, BR, MH and GK. Data analysis: CS, MM, WW and GK. Data interpretation: CS, MM, WW, ARH, MH, MB, and GK. Drafting manuscript: CS, SHP, MM, WW and GK Revising manuscript content: CS, MB and GK. Approving final version of manuscript: CS, SHP, MM, WW, PA, BR, ARH, MH, MB and GK. GK takes responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis.

  • Received August 21, 2015.
  • Revision received September 21, 2015.
  • Accepted September 25, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Ward E
    : Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60: 277-300, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Brogsitter C,
    2. Zöphel K,
    3. Kotzerke J
    : 18F-Choline, 11C-choline and 11C-acetate PET/CT: comparative analysis for imaging prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40(Suppl 1): S18-27, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Han M,
    2. Partin AW,
    3. Zahurak M,
    4. Piantadosi S,
    5. Epstein JI,
    6. Walsh PC
    : Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169: 517-523, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Gomez P,
    2. Manoharan M,
    3. Kim SS,
    4. Soloway MS
    : Radionuclide bone scintigraphy in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: when is it indicated? BJU Int 94: 299-302, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Rigaud J,
    2. Tiguert R,
    3. Le Normand L,
    4. Karam G,
    5. Glemain P,
    6. Buzelin J-M,
    7. Bouchot O
    : Prognostic value of bone scan in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated initially with androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol 168: 1423-1426, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Keidar Z,
    2. Israel O,
    3. Krausz Y
    : SPECT/CT in tumor imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications. Semin Nucl Med 33: 205-218, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ben-Haim S,
    2. Israel O
    : Breast cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med 39: 408-415, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Effert PJ,
    2. Bares R,
    3. Handt S,
    4. Wolff JM,
    5. Büll U,
    6. Jakse G
    : Metabolic imaging of untreated prostate cancer by positron emission tomography with 18fluorine-labeled deoxyglucose. J Urol 155: 994-998, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Beheshti M,
    2. Haim S,
    3. Zakavi R,
    4. Steinmair M,
    5. Waldenberger P,
    6. Kunit T,
    7. Nader M,
    8. Langsteger W,
    9. Loidl W
    : Impact of 18F-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence: influence of androgen deprivation therapy and correlation with PSA kinetics. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med 54: 833-840, 2013.
    OpenUrl
    1. Picchio M,
    2. Spinapolice EG,
    3. Fallanca F,
    4. Crivellaro C,
    5. Giovacchini G,
    6. Gianolli L,
    7. Messa C
    : [11C]Choline PET/CT detection of bone metastases in patients with PSA progression after primary treatment for prostate cancer: comparison with bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39: 13-26, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Maurer T,
    3. Souvatzoglou M,
    4. Beer AJ,
    5. Ruffani A,
    6. Haller B,
    7. Graner F-P,
    8. Kübler H,
    9. Haberhorn U,
    10. Eisenhut M,
    11. Wester H-J,
    12. Gschwend JE,
    13. Schwaiger M
    : Evaluation of Hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med 56: 668-674, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Beheshti M,
    2. Langsteger W,
    3. Fogelman I
    : Prostate cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med 39: 396-407, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Costello LC,
    2. Franklin RB
    : Citrate metabolism of normal and malignant prostate epithelial cells. Urology 50: 3-12, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Fricke E,
    2. Machtens S,
    3. Hofmann M,
    4. van den Hoff J,
    5. Bergh S,
    6. Brunkhorst T,
    7. Meyer GJ,
    8. Karstens JH,
    9. Knapp WH,
    10. Boerner AR
    : Positron emission tomography with 11C-acetate and 18F-FDG in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30: 607-611, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Oyama N,
    2. Akino H,
    3. Kanamaru H,
    4. Suzuki Y,
    5. Muramoto S,
    6. Yonekura Y,
    7. Sadato N,
    8. Yamamoto K,
    9. Okada K
    : 11C-acetate PET imaging of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med 43: 181-186, 2002.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Kotzerke J,
    2. Volkmer BG,
    3. Neumaier B,
    4. Gschwend JE,
    5. Hautmann RE,
    6. Reske SN
    : Carbon-11 acetate positron emission tomography can detect local recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29: 1380-1384, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wachter S,
    2. Tomek S,
    3. Kurtaran A,
    4. Wachter-Gerstner N,
    5. Djavan B,
    6. Becherer A,
    7. Mitterhauser M,
    8. Dobrozemsky G,
    9. Li S,
    10. Pötter R,
    11. Dudczak R,
    12. Kletter K
    : 11C-acetate positron emission tomography imaging and image fusion with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with recurrent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 24: 2513-2519, 2006.
    OpenUrl
    1. Sandblom G,
    2. Sörensen J,
    3. Lundin N,
    4. Häggman M,
    5. Malmström P-U
    : Positron emission tomography with C11-acetate for tumor detection and localization in patients with prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy. Urology 67: 996-1000, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Vees H,
    2. Buchegger F,
    3. Albrecht S,
    4. Khan H,
    5. Husarik D,
    6. Zaidi H,
    7. Soloviev D,
    8. Hany TF,
    9. Miralbell R
    : 18F-choline and/or 11C-acetate positron emission tomography: detection of residual or progressive subclinical disease at very low prostate-specific antigen values (<1 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 99: 1415-1420, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mitterhauser M,
    2. Wadsak W,
    3. Krcal A,
    4. Schmaljohann J,
    5. Bartosch E,
    6. Eidherr H,
    7. Viernstein H,
    8. Kletter K
    : New aspects on the preparation of [11C]acetate--a simple and fast approach via distillation. Appl Radiat Isot Data Instrum Methods Use Agric Ind Med 61: 1147-1150, 2004.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Karanikas G,
    2. Beheshti M
    : (11)C-Acetate PET/CT Imaging: Physiologic Uptake, Variants, and Pitfalls. PET Clin 9: 339-344, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 12
December 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detection of Bone Metastases Using 11C-Acetate PET in Patients with Prostate Cancer with Biochemical Recurrence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Detection of Bone Metastases Using 11C-Acetate PET in Patients with Prostate Cancer with Biochemical Recurrence
CLAUDIO SPICK, STEPHAN H. POLANEC, MARKUS MITTERHAUSER, WOLFGANG WADSAK, PHILIP ANNER, BETTINA REITERITS, ALEXANDER R. HAUG, MARCUS HACKER, MOHSEN BEHESHTI, GEORGIOS KARANIKAS
Anticancer Research Dec 2015, 35 (12) 6787-6791;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Detection of Bone Metastases Using 11C-Acetate PET in Patients with Prostate Cancer with Biochemical Recurrence
CLAUDIO SPICK, STEPHAN H. POLANEC, MARKUS MITTERHAUSER, WOLFGANG WADSAK, PHILIP ANNER, BETTINA REITERITS, ALEXANDER R. HAUG, MARCUS HACKER, MOHSEN BEHESHTI, GEORGIOS KARANIKAS
Anticancer Research Dec 2015, 35 (12) 6787-6791;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Targeting ACSS2 with a Transition-State Mimetic Inhibits Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Growth
  • [18F]-Sodium Fluoride PET MR-Based Localization and Quantification of Bone Turnover as a Biomarker for Facet Joint-Induced Disability
  • Evaluation of Prostate Cancer with 11C-Acetate PET/CT
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy of Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer During PARP Inhibitor Treatment: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Uniformity Between Serological Biomarker Test, Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and Biopsy Histology in Triage of Upper Abdominal Symptoms in Gastroscopy Referral Patients
  • Renal Function With Enfortumab Vedotin in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • bone metastases
  • PET
  • acelate
  • Prostate cancer
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire