Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

A Multidisciplinary Approach for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis

YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA, TAKESHI OMORI, KOICHI DEMURA, HIROSHI MIYATA, KEIJIRO SUGIMURA, MASAYUKI OHUE, SHOGO KOBAYASHI, HIDENORI TAKAHASHI, YUICHIRO DOKI and MASAHIKO YANO
Anticancer Research December 2015, 35 (12) 6739-6745;
YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fujiwara-yo{at}mc.pref.osaka.jp
TAKESHI OMORI
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOICHI DEMURA
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI MIYATA
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEIJIRO SUGIMURA
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAYUKI OHUE
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHOGO KOBAYASHI
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDENORI TAKAHASHI
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUICHIRO DOKI
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAHIKO YANO
1Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The prognosis for advanced gastric cancer with paraaortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is very poor even after a curative resection. In the present study, induction chemotherapy followed by curative surgery was performed for advanced gastric cancer with PALN metastasis. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with no non-curative factors except PALN metastasis who showed good clinical response for induction chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Results: Combined S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy was administered to 10 patients; docetaxel, 5-FU plus cisplatin, to 5; S-1 plus paclitaxel to 3; and capecitabine plus cisplatin, to 2 patients. The overall response rate was 80% (16 out of 20 patients responded). All patients underwent curative gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy including the PALNs. Out of the 20 patients, 8 survived more than 5 years, and the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 72% and 65%, respectively. Female gender and residual PALN metastasis were significantly associated with worse prognosis and patients with a diffuse-type histology had a tendency to worse prognosis. Conclusion: Induction chemotherapy followed by curative surgery including extended PALN dissection seems a promising strategy for advanced gastric cancer with PALN metastasis as a sole distant metastasis, particularly for male patients and those with intestinal-type histology.

  • Gastric cancer
  • para-aortic lymph node metastasis
  • induction chemotherapy
  • extended lymphadenectomy

Over the past few decades, the incidence of gastric cancer has decreased worldwide, particularly in Western countries. However, it remains the fourth most common cancer and is the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1, 2). The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is very poor, even after curative resection combined with superextended lymph node dissection. Tokunaga et al. reported on the survival curve for 178 advanced gastric cancer patients with PALN metastasis who had curative surgery (3). The three-year, five-year, and ten-year survival rates of patients were 20.9%, 13.0% and 7.9%, respectively. Prophylactic PALN dissection has been the standard of care, since occult metastasis had occasionally been observed in lymph nodes, until a Japanese prospective randomized trial investigating the efficacy of prophylactic PALN dissection showed no survival advantage of PALN dissection for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and no additional improvement in mortality and morbidity rates after PALN dissection (4, 5). Since then, PALN dissection has not been routinely performed for patients with curative advanced gastric cancer. The appropriate treatment strategy for PALN metastasis has since been controversial, and the Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2010 do not provide any recommended treatment guidance regarding chemotherapy or surgical resection in gastric cancer patients (6).

Recently, a multi-disciplinary approach has been developed for advanced gastric cancer that includes chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, and the survival benefit of this approach has been investigated worldwide (7, 8). Several novel chemotherapeutic agents, including taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel), irinotecan, oxaliplatin, S-1, and capecitabine, in addition to molecular targeted agents such as trastuzumab, have shown potent effects against gastric cancer (9-14).

Advances in chemotherapy for gastric cancer encouraged us to introduce induction chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with a poor prognosis, such as those with PALN metastasis. In the present study, we retrospectively investigated the therapeutic effect of induction chemotherapy followed by curative surgery for advanced gastric cancer patients without distant metastasis and with PALN metastasis.

Patients and Methods

Patients. From July 2002 to June 2014, 20 patients with PALN metastasis who underwent curative surgery with extended lymph node dissection at the Osaka University Hospital and Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases were enrolled in the study (Table I). Eligibility criteria for this study were as follows: (i) histological confirmation of gastric cancer; (ii) the presence of swollen paraaortic lymph nodes, determined by pre-operative CT and metastasis, confirmed by pathological examination of surgical specimens; additionally, patients whose paraaortic lymph nodes showed pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were also enrolled in the analysis; (iii) absence of non-curable factors such as distant metastasis to the Virchow lymph nodes, liver, lungs or peritoneum shown by preoperative CT and staging laparoscopy for patients with a serosa invading tumor; (iv) performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)] less than 2; (v) age of less than 80 years; (vi) no prior treatment; (vii) adequate bone marrow function (a WBC count of more than 3,000/ml and a platelet count of more than 100,000/ml); (viii) adequate liver function (a serum bilirubin level of less than 1.5 mg/dl and a serum transaminase level less than two-times the upper limit of normal); (ix) adequate renal function (serum creatinine level of less than 1.5 mg/dl); (x) no other severe medical conditions such as symptomatic infectious disease, interstitial pneumonia, active hemorrhage/bleeding or obstructive bowel disease; (xi) not pregnancy or lactation; and (xii) provision of written informed consent in accordance to the guidelines of each Institution or Hospital. The study was approved by the ethics committee of each institution.

Induction chemotherapy. Patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis were first subjected to induction chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of S-1/cisplatin for 10 patients, docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU (DCF) for 5, S-1/paclitaxel for 3, and capecitabine/cisplatin for 2 patients (Table 1). The S-1/cisplatin protocol was according to the one used in the multicenter phase III “SPIRITS” trial (15). The protocol of triplet chemotherapy with DCF has been reported previously (16). The protocol of combination therapy with S-1 and paclitaxel was in accordance with a previous report (17), as was the protocol for combination therapy with xeloda and oxaliplatin (18). The regimen of chemotherapy has been changed during this study according to the appearance of novel anti-tumor agent especially S-1 in Japan. DCF was introduced between 2002 and 2007. S-1/ paclitaxel was introduced between 2003 and 2007. S-1/cisplatin was used between 2002 and 2014 and capecitabine/cisplatin was used between 2011 and 2014.

Response evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Before and after induction chemotherapy, multi-detector row computed-tomography was performed to assess clinical response. The tumor response of the measurable metastatic lymph nodes including PALN was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (19). A complete response (CR) was defined as disappearance of all evidence of cancer for more than 4 weeks. A partial response (PR) was defined as more than a 50% reduction in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of all of lesions without evidence of new regions or progression on any lesions. Stable disease (SD) was defined as less than a 50% reduction or less than a 25% increase in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of all of lesions, without evidence of new lesions. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as more than 25% increase in more than one region or the appearance of new region.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

The characteristics of the patients enrolled in this study (n=20)

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with JMP® software (JMP version 8.0.2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The overall survival (OS) was assessed with the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. All parameters deemed significant in the univariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model were entered into the multivariate survival analysis. p-Values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics of enrolled patients. The characteristics of 20 cases with paraaortic lymph node metastasis are shown in Table I. The average age was 58 (20-74) years. Macroscopic type 3 tumors were dominant, and five patients had type 4 tumors. Diffuse-type histology was dominant in this cohort, especially in female (6 out of 7 cases, 86%), comparded to male patients (7 out of 13 cases, 54%). Twelve out of 20 patients (60%) showed no cancer cells in PALNs with the histological evidence of disappearance of cancer metastasis, such as destruction of normal follicles and/or the presence of fibrous tissue. The remaining 8 patients showed residual cancer metastasis in PALNs. The average number of PALN metastasis in 8 patients was 4.3 (1-17).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Objective response to induction chemotherapy (RECIST criteria).

Effect of induction chemotherapy. Responses to induction chemotherapy, as evaluated by the RECIST criteria targeted for lymph node metastasis including PALN metastasis, are shown in Table II. The total response rate (% of CR+PR) was 80% (16/20). The response rates to docetaxel/5-FU/CDDP, S-1/CDDP, S-1/PTX, and capecitabine /CDDP were 40% (2/5), 100% (10/10), 100% (3/3), and 50% (1/2), respectively.

Surgery. All 20 patients had a curative R0 resection. A distal gastrectomy was performed for 7 patents, a total gastrectomy for 12 patients, and a pancreatico-duodenectomy for one patient. Extended lymphadenectomy was performed for all patients; 16 of the patients had D2 plus paraaortic lymph nodes, and 4 had a D3 lymphadenectomy, which included D2 plus 8p, 12b/p, 13, 14, and 16a2/b1. Ten patients had a total gastrectomy, according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, 13th Edition (20). Post-operative complications [Grade 3 of the Clavien-Dindo classification (21)] occurred in four patients (20%); among the complications were a pancreatic fistula and abdominal abscess in two cases, anastomotic leakage in one case and lymphorrhea in one case (Table III). No hospital deaths were observed. Among the 20 patients, 16 received post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and the remaining 4 had no adjuvant chemotherapy because of pathological CR in 2 cases and severe adverse events in 2 cases.

Pathological examination. Histopathological examination of the resected specimens revealed the following results: no residual cancer cells were observed in 2 cases; and no tumor cells were detected in the PALNs in 12 cases. A representative case is shown in Figure 1. The metastatic PALNs had decreased after 2 courses of induction chemotherapy with DCF (Figure 1A and B), and the pathological examination showed only a fibrotic change with no viable tumor cells (Figure 1C and D).

Survival analysis. Figure 2A and B shows the overall and disease-free survival rates of the 20 patients from the start of induction chemotherapy. Figure 2C and D show the overall and disease-free survival rates after surgical resection. The three-and five-year survival rates were 72% and 65%, respectively. Thirteen patients suffered cancer recurrence, and the remaining 7 showed no recurrence after surgery. Lymph node recurrence including PALN was observed in 6 patients, and peritoneal recurrence occurred in 5 patients (one patient suffered both). One patient suffered brain metastasis, liver metastasis occurred in one patient, and bone metastasis occurred in one patient. The female patients showed significantly worse survival results than did males (p=0.0169, Figure 3A), and the patients with no residual metastasis in the PALNs after induction chemotherapy showed significantly better survival than those with residual PALN metastasis (p=0.0186, Figure 3B). Patients with diffuse-type histology had a tendency to worse survival (p=0.0741, Figure 3C).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Surgical results.

Discussion

Gastric cancer with PALN metastasis is defined as Stage IV by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) and the UICC classifications because of a very poor prognosis even after curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy (20, 22). Although treatment results of curative surgery for gastric cancer with positive PALN are not satisfactory, considering the very low CR rate to intense standard chemotherapy treatment, surgical treatment has proven superior to chemotherapy for gastric cancer cure (15). In the present study, we showed that induction chemotherapy and subsequent curative surgery with extended lymphadenectomy increased the 3- and 5-year survival rates up to 72% and 65%, respectively. Out of 20 patients, 8 patients survived more than 5 years, and out of these long-term survivors, only one patient showed residual metastasis in the PALNs. Figure 3B shows that patients with no residual metastasis in the PALNs after induction chemotherapy had significantly better survival results than those with residual PALN metastasis. These results suggest the following treatment strategy for gastric cancer with PALN metastasis and without other distant metastasis: curative surgery with extended lymphadenectomy should be introduced for patients who have shown a clinical response in the PALNs to induction chemotherapy. Additionally, patients with diffuse-type histology had a tendency to worse survival (Figure 3C). In the present study, macroscopic type 4 tumors with diffuse-type histology were dominant in female patients with death from peritoneal metastasis and brain metastasis soon after surgery. Selecting surgery for type 4 tumors in female patients requires caution even in good responders to induction chemotherapy. Patients who have undergone surgery with extended lymphadenectomy after intensive chemotherapy should be carefully assessed for an increase in post-operative morbidity and mortality. This study had a morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo more than grade III) of 20% (4 of 20) and a mortality rate of 0 %. A pancreatic fistula and intra-abdominal abscess were observed in 2 cases (10%), and anastomotic leakage occurred in one case (5%). The multicenter phase III trial performed in Japan was conducted to compare D2 versus D3 lymphadenectomy (4). That study showed that the morbidity rate of extended lymphadenectomy was 1.9% for an anastomotic leak, 6.2% for a pancreatic fistula, and 5.8% for intra-abdominal abscess and the mortality rate was 0.8% (23). Because the macroscopic lymph node metastasis-negative patients had no preoperative chemotherapy and prophylactic lymphadenectomy, the morbidity rate was lower than in our cohort. Oyama et al. reported a morbidity rate of 33.1% in patients with PALN metastasis who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy with triplet chemotherapy of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1. The morbidity rate was higher than that of patients without pre-operative chemotherapy, however, pre-operative chemotherapy was tolerable for routine treatment (24).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A representative case enrolled in the study. A, B: An enhanced computed tomography image shows swollen PALN, which decreased after 2 courses of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel+cisplatin+5-FU. C, D: Histological examination showed that there were no residual cancer cells in the PALNs, and a fibrotic change was observed, which indicated a pathological response to pre-operative chemotherapy.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Survival analyses. A: Kaplan-Meier analyses of overall survival from the start of induction chemotherapy for all 20 patients enrolled in this study. Median survival time (MST) had not been reached. B: Kaplan-Meier analysis of disease-free survival from the start of induction chemotherapy. MST was 24.6 months. C: Kaplan-Meier analyses of overall survival after surgery for all 20 patients enrolled in this study. MST was 62.5 months. D: Kaplan-Meier analysis of disease-free survival after surgery. MST was 22.7 months.

That study presented the results of patients who had responded to induction chemotherapy and undergone surgery; it did not show the results of patients who had shown no response to chemotherapy and had not had a gastrectomy. Recent progress in chemotherapy has enabled the response rate to increase by more than 50%. It is probable that more than half of gastric cancer patients with PALN metastasis might be treated with a combination of induction chemotherapy and surgery. Recently, Tsuburaya et al. reported the results of a Japanese multicenter clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy with paraaortic lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis. The study enrolled 51 eligible patients, and out of those, 27 cases involved PALN metastasis. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 59% and 53%, respectively. Additionally, the results indicated the advantage of the multidisciplinary approach for treatment of gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (25).

Induction chemotherapy and subsequent curative surgery including extended PALN dissection constitute a promising multidisciplinary approach for advanced gastric cancer with PALN metastasis, particularly for male patients and those with intestinal-type histology.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Survival analyses. A: Kaplan-Meier survival curves accoding to gender (male/female). B: Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to the results of residual PALN metastasis after induction chemotherapy. C: Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to the results of histological types (intestinal type/diffuse type).

  • Received September 12, 2015.
  • Revision received October 3, 2015.
  • Accepted October 19, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Center MM,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Ward E,
    6. Forman D
    : Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2): 69-90, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Parkin DM,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Ferlay,
    4. Pisani P
    : Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55: 74-108, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Tokunaga M,
    2. Ohyama S,
    3. Hiki N,
    4. Fukunaga T,
    5. Aikou S,
    6. Yamaguchi T
    : Can superextended lymph node dissection be justified for gastric cancer with pathologically positive paraaortic lymph nodes? Ann Surg Oncol 17(8): 2031-2036, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sasako M,
    2. Sano T,
    3. Yamamoto S,
    4. Kurokawa Y,
    5. Nashimoto A,
    6. Kurita A,
    7. Hiratsuka M,
    8. Tsujinaka T,
    9. Kinoshita T,
    10. Arai K,
    11. Yamamura Y,
    12. Okajima K
    . D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 359(5): 453-462, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sano T,
    2. Sasako M,
    3. Yamamoto S,
    4. Nashimoto A,
    5. Kurita A,
    6. Hiratsuka M,
    7. Tsujinaka T,
    8. Kinoshita T,
    9. Arai K,
    10. Yamamura Y,
    11. Okajima K
    . Influence of overweight on surgical complications for gastric cancer: results from a randomized control trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic D3 lymphadenectomy (JCOG9501). Ann Surg Oncol 14(2): 355-361, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
    . Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14(2): 113-123, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Macdonald JS,
    2. Smalley SR,
    3. Benedetti J,
    4. Hundahl SA,
    5. Estes NC,
    6. Stemmermann GN,
    7. Haller DG,
    8. Ajani JA,
    9. Gunderson LL,
    10. Jessup JM,
    11. Martenson JA
    : Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma o the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 345: 725-730, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cunningham D,
    2. Allum WH,
    3. Stenning SP,
    4. Thompson JN,
    5. Van de Velde CJ,
    6. Nicolson M,
    7. Scarffe JH,
    8. Lofts FJ,
    9. Falk SJ,
    10. Iveson TJ,
    11. Smith DB,
    12. Langley RE,
    13. Verma M,
    14. Weeden S,
    15. Chua YJ,
    16. MAGIC Trial Participants
    . Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for respectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355: 11-20, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ajani JA,
    2. Fairweather J,
    3. Dumas P,
    4. Patt YZ,
    5. Pazdur R,
    6. Mansfield PF
    : phase II study of Taxol in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. Cancer J Sci Am 4: 269-274, 1988.
    OpenUrl
    1. Einzig AI,
    2. Neuberg D,
    3. Remick SC,
    4. Karp DD,
    5. O'Dwyer PJ,
    6. Stewart JA,
    7. Benson AB 3rd.
    : Phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) results of protocol E1293. Med Oncol 13: 87-93, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Futatsuki K,
    2. Wakui A,
    3. Nakao I,
    4. Sakata Y,
    5. Kambe M,
    6. Shimada Y,
    7. Yoshino M,
    8. Taguchi T,
    9. Ogawa N
    : Late phase II study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in advanced gastric cancer. CPT-11 Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group. Jpn J Cancer Chemother 21(7): 1033-1038, 1994.
    OpenUrl
    1. Taguchi T,
    2. Tsukagoshi S,
    3. Furue H,
    4. Niitani H,
    5. Noda K
    : Phase I clinical study of oxaliplatin. Jpn J Cancer Chemother 25: 1899-1907, 1998.
    OpenUrl
    1. Sakata Y,
    2. Ohtsu A,
    3. Horikoshi N,
    4. Sugimachi K,
    5. Mitachi Y,
    6. Taguchi T
    : Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1(1 M tegafur-0.4 M Gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 34: 1715-1720, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Liu C,
    2. Sun Q,
    3. Hang X,
    4. Zhong B,
    5. Wang D
    : Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Drugs 19: 825-831, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Koizumi W,
    2. Narahara H,
    3. Hara T,
    4. Takagane A,
    5. Akiya T,
    6. Takagi M,
    7. Miyashita K,
    8. Nishizaki T,
    9. Kobayashi O,
    10. Takiyama W,
    11. Toh Y,
    12. Nagaie T,
    13. Takagi S,
    14. Yamamura Y,
    15. Yanaoka K,
    16. Orita H,
    17. Takeuchi M
    : S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9: 215-221, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Yamamoto K,
    2. Fujiwara Y,
    3. Nishida T,
    4. Takiguchi S,
    5. Nakajima K,
    6. Miyata H,
    7. Yamasaki M,
    8. Mori M,
    9. Doki Y
    : Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, 5-FU and CDDP (DFP) for advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 29(10): 4211-4215, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Fujitani K,
    2. Narahara H,
    3. Takiuchi H,
    4. Tsujinaka T,
    5. Satomi E,
    6. Gotoh M,
    7. Hirao M,
    8. Furukawa H,
    9. Taguchi T
    : Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 69(5): 414-420, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kim TW,
    2. Kang YK,
    3. Ahn JH,
    4. Chang HM,
    5. Yook JH,
    6. Oh ST,
    7. Kim BS,
    8. Lee JS
    : Phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 13(9): 1469-1478, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Therasse P,
    2. Arbuck SG,
    3. Eisenhauer EA,
    4. Wanders J,
    5. Kaplan RS,
    6. Rubinstein L,
    7. Verweij J,
    8. Van Glabbeke M,
    9. van Oosterom AT,
    10. Christian MC,
    11. Gwyther SG
    : New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natle Cancer Inst 92: 205-216, 2000.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
    . Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition - Gastric Cancer 1(1): 10-24, 1998.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Clavien PA1,
    2. Barkun J,
    3. de Oliveira ML,
    4. Vauthey JN,
    5. Dindo D,
    6. Schulick RD,
    7. de Santibañes E,
    8. Pekolj J,
    9. Slankamenac K,
    10. Bassi C,
    11. Graf R,
    12. Vonlanthen R,
    13. Padbury R,
    14. Cameron JL,
    15. Makuuchi M
    : The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2): 187-196, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Mullaney PJ,
    2. Wadley MS,
    3. Hyde C,
    4. Wyatt J,
    5. Lawrence G,
    6. Hallissey MT,
    7. Fielding JW
    : Appraisal of compliance with the UICC/AJCC staging system in the staging of gastric cancer. Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum/American Joint Committee on Cancer. Br J Surg 89(11): 1405-1408, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Sano T,
    2. Sasako M,
    3. Yamamoto S,
    4. Nashimoto A,
    5. Kurita A,
    6. Hiratsuka M,
    7. Tsujinaka T,
    8. Kinoshita T,
    9. Arai K,
    10. Yamamura Y,
    11. Okajima K
    : Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy--Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol 22(14): 2767-2773, 2004 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Oyama K,
    2. Fushida S,
    3. Kinoshita J,
    4. Makino I,
    5. Nakamura K,
    6. Hayashi H,
    7. Nakagawara H,
    8. Tajima H,
    9. Fujita H,
    10. Takamura H,
    11. Ninomiya I,
    12. Kitagawa H,
    13. Tani T,
    14. Fujimura T,
    15. Ohta T
    : Efficacy of pre-operative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS therapy) and curative resection for gastric cancer with pathologically positive para-aortic lymph nodes. J Surg Oncol 105(6): 535-541, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Tsuburaya A,
    2. Mizusawa J,
    3. Tanaka Y,
    4. Fukushima N,
    5. Nashimoto A,
    6. Sasako M,
    7. Stomach Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group
    . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy with para-aortic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis. Br J Surg 101(6): 653-660, 2014 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 12
December 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Multidisciplinary Approach for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Multidisciplinary Approach for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis
YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA, TAKESHI OMORI, KOICHI DEMURA, HIROSHI MIYATA, KEIJIRO SUGIMURA, MASAYUKI OHUE, SHOGO KOBAYASHI, HIDENORI TAKAHASHI, YUICHIRO DOKI, MASAHIKO YANO
Anticancer Research Dec 2015, 35 (12) 6739-6745;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
A Multidisciplinary Approach for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis
YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA, TAKESHI OMORI, KOICHI DEMURA, HIROSHI MIYATA, KEIJIRO SUGIMURA, MASAYUKI OHUE, SHOGO KOBAYASHI, HIDENORI TAKAHASHI, YUICHIRO DOKI, MASAHIKO YANO
Anticancer Research Dec 2015, 35 (12) 6739-6745;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy and Safety of Oral 5-FU Derivatives After Progression of HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer on CDK4/6 Inhibitor
  • Postoperative Complications, Including Minor Complications, Worsen Prognosis After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
  • Impact of Emphysema Severity on Clinicopathological and Molecular Features in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • para-aortic lymph node metastasis
  • induction chemotherapy
  • extended lymphadenectomy
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire