Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Comparison of Methods to Identify Lymphatic and Blood Vessel Invasion and their Prognostic Value in Patients with Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer

HESTER CATHARINA VAN WYK, ALAN K. FOULIS, CAMPBELL S. ROXBURGH, CLARE ORANGE, PAUL G. HORGAN and DONALD C. MCMILLAN
Anticancer Research December 2015, 35 (12) 6457-6463;
HESTER CATHARINA VAN WYK
1Academic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences-University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: h.van-wyk.1@research.gla.ac.uk
ALAN K. FOULIS
2University Unit of Pathology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences-University of Glasgow, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAMPBELL S. ROXBURGH
1Academic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences-University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CLARE ORANGE
2University Unit of Pathology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences-University of Glasgow, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAUL G. HORGAN
1Academic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences-University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DONALD C. MCMILLAN
1Academic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life of Sciences-University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Lymphatic and blood vessel invasion are important independent prognostic factors in colorectal cancer, but identification of the separate components remains difficult. The aim of the present study was to compare routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and elastica staining with immunohistochemistry using D2-40 and CD31. Materials and Methods: A total of 75 surgical specimens of colorectal cancer were examined for blood and lymphatic vessel invasion, by comparing stains. Results: The minimum clinical follow-up of survivors was 5 years. During that time, 45 patients died, 34 from their cancer. Lymphatic invasion by H&E was found in 19% compared to 40% detected with D2-40 (p<0.001). Lymphatic invasion was not associated with T-stage (H&E, p=0.923; D2-40, p=0.724) but was significantly associated with N-stage, (H&E, p=0.001; D2-40, p<0.001). No significant association between lymphatic invasion (H&E or D2-40) and cancer-specific survival was found on univariate analysis. Blood vessel invasion by elastic detection was detected in 53% compared to 32% detected with CD31 (p=0.090). Blood vessel invasion was associated with T-stage, (elastica, p=0.028; CD31, p=0.839) but was not associated with N-stage (elastica, p=0.377; CD31, p=0.519). On univariate analysis of blood vessel invasion was associated with cancer-specific survival (elastica, p=0.009) when detected by elastica, but not when detected by CD31, (p=0.611). Lymphatic invasion (D2-40) was associated with blood vessel invasion (elastic) (p=0.019). On multivariate analysis, blood vessel invasion with elastica had independent prognostic value (hazard ratio=2.55, 95% confidence interval=1.23-5.28; p=0.012). Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate that immunohistochemistry using D2-40 improves the identification of lymphatic invasion compared to use of H&E staining only; however, its prognostic value was limited. Elastica staining improves the detection rate of blood vessel invasion (compared to CD31) and venous invasion detected with elastica had independent prognostic value in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • lymphatic invasion
  • blood vessel invasion
  • prognosis

Colorectal cancer represents a leading cause of cancer-related death in the Western world and is by far the most common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract (1). Despite potentially curative surgery for patients with colorectal cancer up to 50% of patients ultimately die of recurrent disease (2). Therefore, improved identification of patients at high risk of recurrence would be beneficial in the allocation of adjuvant treatment.

The principle cause of death in colorectal cancer is metastatic disease and invasion of tumor cells into lymphatic and blood vessels (intravasation) are critical steps for the establishment of metastasis (3). In colorectal cancer, invasive tumor cells either enter the lymphatic system to be transported to regional lymph nodes, or enter into the blood vasculature, where they are transported in vessels of the circulatory system to other organs, particularly the liver (4). At present, prediction of prognosis predominantly relies on TNM staging, that is used to allocate adjuvant treatment.

Lymphatic infiltration by the tumour is recognized as a significant risk factor for lymph node metastasis, as well as survival in colorectal cancer (5-7). Nevertheless detection remains difficult on routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, while immunohistochemical staining appears to improve detection (7, 8). Venous invasion of the tumor is recognised as a feature of colorectal cancer progression and elastica staining can be used to improve the detection as well as prediction of survival (9, 10). A recent review of the literature concluded that further work was required to establish the best staining approaches to identify lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in clinical pathological practice (7).

The aim of the present study was to directly compare the detection of lymphatic invasion using H&E with that using D2-40, a specific marker of lymphatic endothelium, and to compare the detection of blood vessel invasion using elastica with that using CD31, a marker of vascular endothelium, in a series of resected colorectal carcinomas. The value of these different staining methods in assessing the role of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in predicting cancer survival was then examined.

Materials and Methods

A total of 75 patients were selected for the study from a prospective database of patients with histologically proven colorectal cancer, who on the basis of laparotomy findings and preoperative abdominal computed tomography, were considered to have undergone potentially curative resection between 1997 and 2007 at a single surgical unit at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, had metastatic disease at diagnosis, and those who died within 30 days of surgery were excluded. The tumours were staged using conventional Dukes' and TNM classifications (11). The Research Ethics Committee of North Glasgow University Hospitals approved the use of patient data and tissue for this study.

Routine stains: H&E. For evaluation of lymphatic invasion with H&E, routine slides were evaluated and findings recorded. Lymphatic invasion was recorded when tumour was seen within an endothelial-lined space devoid of mural smooth muscle, elastic fibres, and luminal red blood cells (Figure 1A).

Routine stains: Elastica. For evaluation of blood vessel invasion with Miller's elastica, routine slides were evaluated and findings recorded. Venous invasion was recorded if tumour was seen in a vessel with elastic fibres in its adventitia. Extramural and intramural blood vessel invasion were grouped together for analysis as “blood vessel” invasion.

Immunohistochemistry. For evaluation of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion, two parallel 4-μm-thick sections from each specimen corresponding to the same routine slides of H&E and elastica (deepest portion of tumour) were stained by D2-40 (monoclonal, SIG-3730, 1:100 dilution; Covance, USA) and CD31 (monoclonal, 0823, 1:100 dilution; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for confirmation of the vascular nature of the structure. Briefly, sections were de-waxed in xylene and rehydrated in a sequence of descending concentrations of ethanol. For antigen retrieval of CD31, sections were microwaved for 14 min in sodium citrate buffer (pH 6). Endogenous hydrogen peroxidase reactivity was blocked with 3% H2O2 for 15 min. Non-specific reactions were blocked by incubation with 10% horse serum for 30 minutes. Sections were subsequently incubated with the respective primary antibody: 60 minutes at room temperature for D2-40 and 30 minutes at 25°C for CD31. Sites of binding were detected using the Envision technique (K5007; Dako) with 3-30 diaminobenzidine (SK 4001; Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA), a chromogenic substrate, according to the manufacturer's instruction. Slides were counterstained with haematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted with distyrene plasticizer xylene.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

The clinicopathological features of primary operable colorectal tumors (n=75).

Evaluation of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion. D2-40 and CD31 immunostained sections were screened for the presence of lymphatic invasion. Assessment of lymphatic invasion and blood vessel invasion were conducted by the differential expression of these markers. Lymphatic invasion was discerned by the presence of tumour cells within D2-40-positive, CD31-positive vessels (11) (Figure 1B). Although CD31 was also found to be positive in lymphatic vessels, it was recorded as blood vessel invasion when tumour was seen in D2-40-negative, CD31-positive vessel. A total of 75 immunostained sections for lymphatic and blood vessel invasion were independently scored by two observers (HVW and AF) blinded to patient outcome and the other observer's score. Differences between reporters were resolved, following review at a multiheaded microscope whereby agreement was reached.

Statistical analysis. Consistency between the observers was analysed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCC), with values of 0.6 or higher considered acceptable and greater than 0.7 considered good. Chi-square test was used to examine associations between clinicopathological data and the presence of lymphatic invasion and blood vessel invasion. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The influence of a given parameter on survival was assessed with the log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazard regression model was used in multivariate analysis. Deaths up to the end of 2011 were included in the analysis. p-Values of 0.05 or less were considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

The relationship between clinicopathological features and lymphatic invasion assessed by H&E and D2-40

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

The relationship between clinicopathological features and blood vessel invasion assessed by elastica and CD31 staining.

Results

The pathological characteristics, presence of lymphatic invasion and blood vessel invasion of colorectal carcinomas (n=75) are shown Table I.

The patients consisted of 38 men and 37 women with a median age of 68 years. Cancer affected the colon in 56 (75%) and rectum in 19 (25%) of patients. In terms of T-stage, tumor invaded to the submucosa in one (1%) patient, to the muscularis propria in one (1%), subserosa in 53 (71%), and peritoneum in 20 (27%) patients. No positive lymph nodes were found in 33 (44%) patients, 1-3 lymph nodes contained tumor in 36 (48%), and three or more lymph nodes were positive in six (8%) patients. One patient (1%) had stage I disease, 32 (43%) stage II and 42 (56%) stage III after surgical resection.

Histology showed 70 (93%) of the tumors were well-differentiated and 5 (7%) of tumors were poorly differentiated. Tumor perforation was present 1 (1%) of tumours. Serosal involvement was recorded in 18 (24%) of tumours and surgical margins were involved in three (4%) resection specimens. In 34 (45%) specimens, more than 12 lymph nodes were retrieved.

The relationship between clinicopathological features and lymphatic invasion assessed by D2-40 and by H&E are shown in Table II. H&E detected lymphatic invasion in 19% (14/75), while immunohistochemistry (D2-40) detected lymphatic invasion in 40% (30/75) of cases (p=0.001). Of the lymphatic invasions detected by immunohistochemistry, 5% (1/75) of tumors had lymphatic invasion on both D2-40 and CD31 slides. The presence of lymphatic invasion determined by H&E and immunohistochemistry (D2-40) was directly compared. Lymphatic invasion was not associated with T-stage (H&E, p=0.923; D2-40, p=0.724) but was significantly associated with N-stage, (H&E, p=0.001; D2-40, p<0.001).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Example of lymphatic invasion with H&E (A) and D2-40 (B) in colorectal cancer. Scale bar 100 μm.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Blood vessel invasion as shown by staining of elastica (A) and CD31 (B) in colorectal cancer. Tumour in blood vessel and endothelial lining destroyed are clearly visible. Scale bar 100 μm.

The relationship between clinicopathological features and blood vessel invasion assessed by CD31 and by elastica are shown in Table III. Blood vessel invasion was detected with Miller's elastica in 53% of tumors compared to 32% detected with CD31 (p=0.090). Blood vessel invasion detected by elastica was associated with T-stage (p=0.028) but not when detected by CD31 (p=0.839). Venous invasion detected by either method was not associated with N-stage (elastica, p=0.377; CD31, p=0.519).

Elastica staining of elastic fibres in the wall of large blood vessels thus enhanced detection (Figure 2A). CD31 staining of involved blood vessels was common and seen both in intratumoural as well as peritumoural areas of the tumour. Although CD31 was used to identify vascular endothelium, it appeared more helpful in identifying lymphatic and small blood vessel invasion than venous invasion, as the endothelium of some larger veins invaded by tumour was destroyed (Figure 2B).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Relationship between blood vessel invasion as shown by using elastica staining and cancer-specific survival of patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer (p=0.007).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

The comparison between lymphatic and blood vessel invasion with routine and specific stains and cancer-specific survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer.

The minimum clinical follow-up of survivors was 5 years. During that time, 45 patients died, 34 from their cancer. The comparison of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion between routine and special stains and cancer-specific survival in primary operable colorectal cancer is shown in Table IV.

On univariate analysis, lymphatic invasion (H&E, p=0.361; D2-40, p=0.078) was not significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. On univariate analysis, blood vessel invasion detected by elastica was associated with poorer cancer-specific survival (elastica, p=0.009; CD31, p=0.611) as well as N-stage (p=0.05). Lymphatic invasion detected with D2-40 was associated with blood vessel invasion detected with elastica (p=0.019). On multivariate analysis, elastic blood vessel invasion remained independently associated with poorer cancer specific survival (hazard ratio=2.55, 95% confidence interval=1.23-5.28, p=0.007) (Figure 3).

Discussion

The results of the present study show that compared to H&E, the use of an immunohistochemical stain D2-40 improved the detection of lymphatic invasion but this feature was not significantly associated with survival. In contrast, compared to the immunohistochemical stain (CD31), elastica was more sensitive in the detection of blood vessel invasion and revealed venous invasion (but not CD31 detected venous invasion) was significantly associated with survival. Lymphatic invasion with D2-40 staining was associated with blood vessel invasion with elastica staining. Taken together these results indicate that specific stains (immunohistochemical stain D2-40 and elastica) play an important role in the detection of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion.

In the present study, the incidence rate of lymphatic invasion with H&E and D2-40 was 19% and 40%, respectively, and was within the range of previous reports. (6, 7, 12). It also confirms the difficulty in detecting lymphatic invasion with the routine H&E staining procedure and confirms the increased sensitivity of D2-40. Lymphatic invasion with D2-40 was mainly seen at the invasive margin of the tumor and not within the tumour. Despite Kenney and Jain reporting that lymphatic vessels were present within the lamina propria of colonic tissue in pathological states (13), controversy still exists about the importance of the exact localisation of tumour lymphatic vessels in colorectal cancer (14, 15) and further investigation of methods of detection of lymphatic vessels is warranted.

In the present study, lymphatic invasion (by both H&E and D2-40) was positively associated with nodal metastasis. This suggests that tumor cells reach lymph nodes mainly via the lymphatic system (12, 16, 22). Therefore, lymphatic invasion is likely to play an important role in predicting lymph node metastases in early cancer, for example in endoscopically-resected cancerous polyps (17). However, in the present small study, the association of both H&E and D2-40 with survival was relatively weak. Larger studies have reported that lymphatic invasion as shown by D2-40 was significantly associated with nodal metastases and disease progression (6, 18, 19).

In terms of blood vessel invasion, the incidence rate of blood vessel invasion with routine elastic (53%) and CD31 (32%) were within the range of previous reports (7). Blood vessel invasion, as revealed by staining of CD31, was seen in peritumoural and intratumoural areas and was more useful in demonstrating small vessel invasion as the endothelial lining of some bigger vessels was destroyed by tumour. In contrast to CD31, blood vessel invasion revealed with elastica was positively associated with tumor stage. Blood vessel invasion with elastica was also significantly associated with shorter cancer-specific survival duration in the present study. This work is consistent with and correlates with previous reports (10, 20, 21).

When the relationship between lymphatic invasion (D2-40) and blood vessel invasion (elastica) was examined, they were found to be directly associated. However, only blood vessel invasion was independently associated with cancer survival. These results would suggest lymphatic and blood vessel invasion may reflect the same process promoting tumour dissemination. If this were proven to be the case, it would have important implications for the staging and treatment of colorectal cancer.

A limitation of the present study was that although lymphatic and blood vessel invasion are included in guidelines for current pathological reporting in colorectal cancer, lymphatic invasion on H&E-stained slides did not have any prognostic value. This may suggest that the sample size was rather small for such survival analysis. Nevertheless, there was a direct comparison with other staining approaches and blood vessel invasion did have a prognostic value. This would suggest that the present results are of value and make the case for increased appreciation of the relative prognostic value of blood vessel invasion (using elastica staining) in such patients.

In conclusion, immunostaining with D2-40 has potential as a marker of lymph node metastasis in early-stage colorectal cancer. The detection of blood vessel invasion appears to be optimised by utilising elastica stain, resulting in improved detection rates and improved prediction of survival. The present results also point to the relative role of special stains in tumour progression and dissemination in patients with colorectal cancer.

  • Received August 25, 2015.
  • Revision received September 28, 2015.
  • Accepted October 7, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel R,
    2. Desantis C,
    3. Jemal A
    : Colorectal cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 64: 104-17, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Hyslop T,
    2. Waldman S
    : Molecular staging of node negative patients with colorectal cancer. J Cancer 4: 193-199, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Stacker SA,
    2. Achen MG,
    3. Jussila L,
    4. Baldwin ME,
    5. Alitalo K
    : Metastasis: Lymphangiogenesis and cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 2(8): 573-583, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sleeman JP,
    2. Thiele W
    : Tumor metastasis and the lymphatic vasculature. Int J Cancer 125: 2747-2756, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Suzuki A,
    2. Togashi K,
    3. Nokubi M,
    4. Koinuma K,
    5. Miyakura Y,
    6. Horie H,
    7. Lefor AT,
    8. Yasuda Y
    : Evaluation of venous invasion by Elastica van Gieson stain and tumor budding predicts local and distant metastases in patients with T1 stage colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 33: 1601-1607, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Barresi V,
    2. Bonetti L.R,
    3. Vitarelli E,
    4. Di Gregorio C,
    5. de Leon MP,
    6. Barresi G
    : Immunohistochemical assessment of lymphovascular invasion in stage I colorectal carcinoma: prognostic relevance and correlation with nodal micrometastases. Am J Surg Pathol 36: 66-72, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Van Wyk HC,
    2. Roxburgh CS,
    3. Horgan PG,
    4. Foulis AF,
    5. McMillan DC
    : The detection and role of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in predicting survival in patients with node-negative operable primary colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 90: 77-90, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cserni G,
    2. Sejben I,
    3. Bori R
    : Diagnosing vascular invasion in colorectal carcinomas: improving reproducibility and potential pitfalls. J Clin Pathol 66: 543-547, 2013.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Sato T,
    2. Ueno H,
    3. Mochizuki H,
    4. Shinto E,
    5. Hashiguchi Y,
    6. Kajiwara Y,
    7. Shimazaki H,
    8. Hase K
    : Objective criteria for the grading of venous invasion in colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 34: 454-462, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Roxburgh C S,
    2. McMillan DC,
    3. Anderson JH,
    4. McKee RF,
    5. Horgan PG,
    6. Foulis AF
    : Elastica staining for venous invasion results in superior prediction of cancer-specific survival in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 252: 989-997, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Fleming ID,
    2. Cooper JS,
    3. Henson DE,
    4. Hutter RVP,
    5. Kennedy BJ,
    6. Murphy GP
    : AJCC 5th edition cancer staging manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.
  12. ↵
    1. Liang P,
    2. Nakada I,
    3. Hong JW,
    4. Tabuchi T,
    5. Motohashi G,
    6. Takemura A,
    7. Nakachi T,
    8. Kasuga T,
    9. Tabuchi T
    : Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically detected blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in colorectal carcinoma: its impact on prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 14: 470-477, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kenney BC,
    2. Jain D
    : Identification of lymphatics within the colonic lamina propria in inflammation and neoplasia using the monoclonal antibody D2-40. Yale J Biol Med 81: 103-107,2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Walgenbach-Bruenagel G,
    2. Tolba A,
    3. Varnai M,
    4. Bollmann M,
    5. Hirner A,
    6. Walgenbach K
    : Detection of lymphatic invasion in early-stage primary colorectal cancer with the monoclonal antibody D2-40. Eur Surg Res 38: 438-444, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Royston D,
    2. Jackson DG
    : Mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis in human colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Pathol 217: 608-619, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Minsky B D,
    2. Mies C,
    3. Rich T A,
    4. Recht A
    : Lymphatic vessel invasion is an independent prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17: 311-318,1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Risio M
    : The natural history of colorectal adenomas and early cancer. Pathologe 33(2): 206-210, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Matsumoto K,
    2. Yoshifumi Nakayama M,
    3. Inoue Yuzuru,
    4. Minagawa N,
    5. Katsuki T,
    6. Shibao K,
    7. Tsurudome Y,
    8. Hirata K,
    9. Nagata N,
    10. Itoh H
    : Lymphatic microvessel density is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50: 308-314, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ishii M,
    2. Ota M,
    3. Saito S,
    4. Kinugasa Y,
    5. Akamoto S,
    6. Ito I
    : Lymphatic vessel invasion detected by monoclonal antibody D2-40 as a predictor of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 24: 1069-1074, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Messenger DE,
    2. Driman DK,
    3. Mcleod RS,
    4. Riddell RH,
    5. Kirsch R
    : Current practice patterns among pathologists in the assessment of venous invasion in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 64: 983-989, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Roxburgh C S,
    2. McMillan DC,
    3. Richards CH,
    4. Atwan M,
    5. Anderson JH,
    6. Harvey T,
    7. Horgan PG,
    8. Foulis AK
    : The clinical utility of the combination of T-stage and venous invasion to predict survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 259: 1156-1165, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Mohammed R A,
    2. Ellis IO,
    3. Mahmmod A M,
    4. Hawkes C,
    5. Green AR,
    6. Rakha E,
    7. Martin SG
    : Lymphatic and blood vessels in basal and triple-negative breast cancers: characteristics and prognostic significance. Mod Pathol 24: 774-785, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 35 (12)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 12
December 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Methods to Identify Lymphatic and Blood Vessel Invasion and their Prognostic Value in Patients with Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Methods to Identify Lymphatic and Blood Vessel Invasion and their Prognostic Value in Patients with Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer
HESTER CATHARINA VAN WYK, ALAN K. FOULIS, CAMPBELL S. ROXBURGH, CLARE ORANGE, PAUL G. HORGAN, DONALD C. MCMILLAN
Anticancer Research Dec 2015, 35 (12) 6457-6463;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Comparison of Methods to Identify Lymphatic and Blood Vessel Invasion and their Prognostic Value in Patients with Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer
HESTER CATHARINA VAN WYK, ALAN K. FOULIS, CAMPBELL S. ROXBURGH, CLARE ORANGE, PAUL G. HORGAN, DONALD C. MCMILLAN
Anticancer Research Dec 2015, 35 (12) 6457-6463;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Forecasting Survival Probabilities After Radiotherapy of Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression from Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comprehensive Analysis of KREMEN2 as an Immunotherapeutic and Prognostic Biomarker in Pan-Cancer
  • PD-L1 mRNA Detection in Immunohistochemically Negative Patients: A Complementary Method for a Better Treatment Selection?
  • Immune Cell Infiltration and Clinical Significance of Angiogenesis-related Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • lymphatic invasion
  • blood vessel invasion
  • prognosis
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire