Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Innovative Therapeutic Strategies in the Treatment of Meningioma

GERARDO CARUSO, SAMER K. ELBABAA, PABLO GONZALEZ-LOPEZ, VALERIA BARRESI, MARCELLO PASSALACQUA and MARIA CAFFO
Anticancer Research December 2015, 35 (12) 6391-6400;
GERARDO CARUSO
1Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neuroscience, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gcaruso@unime.it
SAMER K. ELBABAA
2Department of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PABLO GONZALEZ-LOPEZ
3Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Alicante, Miguel Hernandez University School of Medicine, Alicante, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VALERIA BARRESI
4Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARCELLO PASSALACQUA
1Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neuroscience, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA CAFFO
1Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neuroscience, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Few medical options are available for progressive/recurrent and atypical/anaplastic meningiomas. New developments in chemotherapeutic options for meningiomas have been explored over the past decade. We review the more recent literature to recognize studies investigating recent medical and chemotherapeutic agents that have been experienced or are currently being tested for meningiomas. Combination therapies affecting multiple molecular targets are currently opening up and present significant promise as adjuvant therapeutic options. However, there is an evident need for new molecular studies in order to better understand the biology of meningiomas and, thus, to identify new and more specific therapeutic targets.

  • Meningioma
  • nanomedicine
  • surgery
  • targeted therapies
  • treatment
  • review

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial neoplasm, constituting over one-third of all brain tumors (1). Meningiomas arise from arachnoidal cells of the leptomeninges and may occur wherever arachnoidal cells are located. The origin of meningioma is yet to be determined. Certainly radiation therapy used in the treatment of brain tumors is associated with an increased risk of meningioma. Moreover, the presence of progesterone and estrogen receptors denotes a possible link between the development of meningioma and sex hormones. Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NFT2) is an autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by mutations of the tumor suppressor gene neurofibromin 2 (NF2) on chromosome 22q12.2. This gene encodes the merlin structural protein of the membrane. Typically, individuals with NFT2 develop multiple meningiomas.

About 90% of meningiomas are classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system as WHO grade I (2). This group includes meningothelial, fibroblastic and transitional meningiomas. WHO grade I meningiomas are generally defined as benign, but, for these histotypes, recurrence rates are in the range of 7-20% and these have a clear possibility of progression to higher grades. Atypical meningiomas WHO grade II include 5-15% of all meningiomas (3). These lesions present recurrence rates of 30-40% (3). Chordoid and clear cell meningiomas have an aggressive course, with a high rate of recurrence, and are classified as grade II (4). Anaplastic or malignant meningiomas are classified as WHO grade III and account for 1-3% of cases (3). Grade III tumors have higher frequencies of local invasion, recurrence, and metastasis.

The treatment of choice for benign meningiomas is represented by total surgical resection, resulting in prolonged disease-free survival (5). Conversely, atypical and malignant meningiomas frequently recur and are associated with a shorter overall survival (6). Treatment options for recurrence or incomplete resection include further surgery, conventional external beam irradiation, stereotactic radiosurgery and systemic therapies. To date, chemotherapies and hormonal therapies have had only a very limited role and have been shown to be generally ineffective. Radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery is limited by radiation neurotoxicity, tumor size, and injury to adjacent vascular or cranial nerves. Over the past decades, the use of systemic therapies in the treatment of meningiomas has been the subject of intense research and novel promising drugs with therapeutic potential are now being tested in an increased number of clinical trials. Recently nanomedicine, the application of nanotechnology to health care, holds great promise for revolutionizing medical treatments, imaging, drug delivery, and tissue regeneration. Nanoparticle systems in cancer therapies provide better penetration of therapeutic and diagnostic agents, and a reduced risk in comparison to conventional treatments. By using nanotechnology, it is possible to deliver the drug to the targeted tissue and release the drug at a controlled rate.

Herein, we review the current literature for therapeutic approaches for meningiomas. In particular, after discussing the standard therapy for meningiomas, including surgery and radiation therapy, we focus on novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of recurrent and malignant meningiomas, highlighting the emerging role of targeted molecular therapies.

Current Treatments

Surgery. Meningiomas grow by expanding, leading to compression of the adjacent structures (7). For symptomatic or progressively enlarging meningiomas, complete surgical excision of the tumor bulk, and surrounding dural attachment, is recommended. Prognostic variables predictive of survival in patients with meningiomas include the extent of resection, histological grade, patient's age, and tumor location. The completeness of surgical removal is an important prognostic feature (8). The best accepted factor for prediction of recurrence is the Simpson grading system, which evaluates invasion of the venous sinuses, tumor nodules in adjacent dura, and infiltration of bone by meningothelial cells as chief causes for recurrence (9). Patients with a Simpson grade 1 (complete removal) meningioma have a 10-year recurrence rate of 9% compared to patients with a Simpson grade 3 (complete removal, without coagulation of dural attachment or resection of involved sinus or hyperostotic bone) meningioma, for whom the 10-year recurrence rate is about 29%. Kinjo et al. classified a more extensive resection as “grade zero”, requiring gross total resection of the primary, any hyperostotic bone, and all involved dura with a 2 cm dural margin (10).

More factors may represent probable causes of recurrence in meningiomas. Extent of tumor resection, histological type and WHO grade, and brain invasion are prognostic factors of meningioma recurrence. Sphenoid wing and parasagittal meningiomas recur most frequently because of their location and sinus attachments. The presence of remaining meningotheliomatous cells on dural strips or the presence of neoplastic dural cells around the site of craniotomy, might be reasons for recurrence (11, 12). The possibility of a correlation between genetic and immunohistochemical markers and meningioma recurrence is highly intriguing. Genes of histone cluster 1 on 6p, as well as genes cyclin B1 (CCNB1) and marker of proliferation Ki-67 (MKI67) were shown to be overexpressed in recurrent meningiomas (13, 14). More, chromosomal aberrations associated with higher-grade meningioma include 1p, 6q, 10p, 10q, 14q, and 18q (15). Other markers that have been reported to correlate with higher-grade meningioma include the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) proto-oncogene, p53, p51, alterations in tumor-suppressor genes, the apoptosis antigen 1 (FAS receptor or APO1) transmembrane protein, the extracellular matrix protein tenascin, and five novel meningioma-expressed antigens (15-17). Immunohistochemical staining with the MIB-1 antibody (Ki-67) has consistently correlated with meningioma recurrence (18). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has also been associated with recurrence due to increased neovascularization (19). Osteopontin, a factor regulating several processes in tumor progression, is more highly expressed in recurrent compared to non-recurrent meningiomas and in grade II compared with grade I meningiomas (20). However, subtotal resection alone remains common in practice, and in some series of patients with 10 to 20 years of follow-up, the 5-, 10-, and longer than 15-year progression rates following subtotal resection were 37 to 47%, 55 to 63%, and greater than 70%, respectively (21).

Radiation therapy. The role of surgery alone, especially for atypical and malignant meningiomas, can sometimes be unsuccessful. Factors considered in the decision to use radiation therapy include the extent of resection, grade, and histological subtype, as well as age (in the case of pediatric meningiomas).

Several types of external-beam radiation exist, including modern approaches such as photon-based stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiation therapy. Treatment plans may be directed to the remaining lesion following subtotal resection, or the resection cavity plus a margin of approximately 1 cm following gross total resection of higher grade tumors. Preliminary observational studies have demonstrated that immediate postoperative radiation improves the outcomes in patients with WHO grade II and III meningiomas (22). Aghi and colleagues, in a series of 108 patients with atypical meningiomas who underwent gross total resection, showed that immediate postoperative radiation reduces local tumor recurrence and improves survival of patients (23). Radiation necrosis, exacerbation of peritumoral edema and cranial nerve palsy are the principle complications observed in patients undergoing radiation therapy (22).

Radiosurgery. Radiosurgery can represent an effective primary or adjunctive treatment for grade I meningiomas located in regions where aggressive resection carries a high risk of operative morbidity (24, 25). Radiosurgery also represents a valid option for recurrent or partially resected meningiomas less than 35 mm in diameter (26, 27). On the other hand, the role of radiosurgery in the treatment of grade II and III meningiomas is not well-established, and the outcomes of patients treated with radiosurgery reported in various studies are not yet well-defined. The validity of radiosurgical treatment in patients affected by grade II and III meningiomas is still an object of debate due to the large number of variables minored such as tumor features, patient characteristics and type of outcome scale adopted. However, in an interesting review, characterized by a cohort of grade II and III meningiomas treated with radiosurgery, the authors demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 5 years of 25-83% (median 59%) for those with grade II tumors and 0%-72% (median 13%) for those with grade III tumors (24). Prospective clinical trials evaluating the risk-benefit profile of conservative management, external-beam radiation therapy and radiosurgery in the setting of residual and recurrent disease are necessary (28). However, due to the relatively low prevalence of grade II and III meningiomas compared to grade I tumors, it is unlikely that a prospective trial will be able to accrue a statistically adequate number of patients.

Cytotoxic agents. Chemotherapeutic agents target specific pathophysiological pathways and molecular mechanisms that control various processes including cellular differentiation, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. However, chemotherapeutic treatment is limited by poor understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of meningiomas, as well as by the lack of tumor models and pre-clinical studies.

Numerous conventional cytotoxic agents, including temozolomide, hydroxyurea, imatinib, trabectedin, and irinotecan have been studied over the years for treatment of meningiomas. However, results from clinical trials have generally been disappointing (29).

In a phase II study, temozolomide was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2/day for 42 days every 10 weeks, to 16 patients affected by refractory meningiomas. None of the 16 enrolled patients experienced a complete or partial radiological response to therapy (30). Subsequently, de Robles et al. demonstrated the role of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase in limiting the therapeutic potential of temozolomide (31).

Hydroxyurea is an oral ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor that arrests the cell cycle in the S-phase and induces apoptosis. In a preliminary report, hydroxyurea reduced tumor size in three patients with recurrent benign meningiomas, and prevented recurrent disease for 24 months in a patient after complete resection of malignant meningioma (32). A follow-up retrospective study of 35 patients with WHO grade II and III meningiomas showed 57% of patients to have progression of disease at 6 months, showing a low efficacy of hydroxyurea in tumor control (33). The activity of hydroxyurea is now being studied in association with other compounds. Calcium channel antagonists (CCAs), such as verapamil and diltiazem, can block the stimulatory effects of numerous growth factors on meningioma cell culture and augment the growth inhibitory effects of hydroxyurea (34, 35). An experimental study demonstrated the effectiveness of CCAs with hydroxyurea and RU486 (mifepristone) in a xenograft mouse meningioma tumor model, with decreased cellular proliferation and vascular density (34). Furthermore, it has been shown that CCAs block the mitogenic effects of various growth factors, induce G1 cell-cycle arrest, and augment the growth inhibitory effects of both hydroxyurea and RU486 (35). Recently, Reardon et al. examined the activity of imatinib plus hydroxyurea in a phase II trial of 21 patients with progressive/recurrent meningiomas. The primary end-point was PFS at 6 months and secondary endpoints were safety, radiographic response rate, and overall survival (OS). Best radiographic response was stable disease and was observed in 14 patients (67%). Imatinib plus hydroxyurea was well-tolerated but showed a modest antitumor activity (36). Negligible activity of imatinib was evident in another series of 23 patients with recurrent/progressive meningioma (37). No radiographic responses to imatinib monotherapy were observed and PFS at 6 months was only 29.4% (37).

Trabectedin was investigated in a pre-clinical study published by Preusser et al., and demonstrated a statistically significant response to treatment of various meningioma cell lines. The activity of trabectedin was tested against primary cell cultures obtained from surgical meningioma samples. A favorable clinical benefit was observed in cell cultures from a patient with advanced anaplastic meningioma and extensive tumor recurrence (38).

An experimental study evaluated the activity of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11) on primary meningioma cultures and a malignant meningioma cell line in vitro and in vivo. Irinotecan induced a dose-dependent anti-proliferative effect with apoptosis in the primary meningioma cultures, as well as in the IOMM-Lee human malignant meningioma cell line. In the animal model, irinotecan treatment led to a statistically significant decrease in tumor growth and an increase in apoptotic cell death (39).

Curic et al. described a dose-dependent response of meningioma cell lines exposed to curcumin, component of the spice plant Curcuma longa, which is known to have anti-tumorigenic properties (40). Park et al. also demonstrated a potent cytotoxic effect of acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid, a substance isolated from the gum resin of Boswellia serrata trees, on 11 primary cell lines derived from human meningioma resections. This class of boswellic acid drugs is believed to work by inhibition of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 and the serine protease cathepsin G (41).

Targeted Therapies

Targeted therapies block activation of oncogenic pathways, either at the ligand-receptor interaction level or by inhibiting downstream signal transduction pathways, thereby inhibiting growth and progression of cancer (42, 43). Because of their specificity, targeted therapies should theoretically have better efficacy and safety profiles than systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The pathogenesis and molecular genetics of meningiomas are not well known, and a large number of chromosomal, signaling pathways and growth factor alterations have been reported. Several genes have been identified as targets for mutation or inactivation. Additional chromosomal regions have been found to be commonly deleted or amplified, suggesting the presence of further tumor-suppressor genes or proto-oncogenes in these regions (44). Many genetic factors and pathways have been associated with the proliferation, progression, and recurrence of meningiomas.

Growth factor pathways. A wide variety of growth factors have been implicated in the biology of meningiomas. These include platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factors α (TGFα) and β (TGFβ), stromal cell-derived growth factor B, and bone morphogenetic proteins. PDGF and EGF play a critical role in the activation of main anti-apoptotic cell signaling pathways [rat sarcoma (RAS)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)] and phosphoinositide 3 kinase–protein kinase B (PI3K–AKT) and of a secondary pathway phospholipase C-γ1-protein kinase C (45). Activating PI3K leads to AKT phosphorylation and p70 (S6K) activation by way of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). High levels of phosphorylated AKT are found in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. Inhibition of this pathway with selective mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) inhibitors has shown reduced MAPK activity and inhibition in meningioma cell cultures (45). Farnesyl transferase inhibitors, a class of chemotherapeutic agents that block farnesyl transferase, thereby inhibiting RAS localization and activation to the cytoplasmic surface of the receptor are under investigation (45).

The invasiveness of neoplastic cells of human meningiomas has been related to expression of matrix-metalloproteinase-9, a peptidase actively implicated in the degradation of the extracellular matrix (46). A plasmid vector was used to transfect meningioma cells in vitro and in vivo with complementary double-stranded RNA to cathepsin B and matrix-metalloproteinase-9 mRNA. Decreased expression of these enzymes, associated with a significant reduction of meningioma migration and invasiveness, was observed (47). Merlin is a member of the erzin-radixinmoesin family of proteins and interacts with the intermolecular amino-terminal domain and the carboxyl-terminal domain through phosphorylation. The functions of merlin are not well understood, but it is believed that they involve regulation of cell proliferation pathways, which have a prominent role in meningioma propagation. Expression of NF2 and merlin inactivation varies among WHO grade I meningioma subtypes (48).

The PI3K pathway is the parallel pathway by which meningioma induction and propagation via growth factor effects are mediated. PI3K catalyzes the conversion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to PIP 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3), a reaction that is controlled and inhibited by phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). PIP3 activates AKT protein, which in turn activates mTOR (49). Pachow et al. recently demonstrated significant reductions in meningioma cell growth in mouse models treated with the mTOR inhibitor drugs temsirolimus and everolimus (50).

The EGF receptors (EGFRs) are overexpressed in up to 60% of meningiomas. These receptors stimulate the MAPK and PI3K pathways. An interesting study showed that treatment with EGFR inhibitors gefitinib (64%) or erlotinib (36%) in 25 patients with refractory meningiomas did not result in significant benefits (51). Other agents that inhibit EGFR alone, or together with other receptor tyrosine kinases may have therapeutic potential activity against meningiomas. For instance, lapatinib inhibits EGFR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HKI-272 inhibits all subtypes of the EGFR, and ZD6474 inhibits EGFR and VEGFR. Humanized monoclonal antibodies to EGFR, including cetuximab, panitumumab, matuzumab, EMD 72000, mAb 806, and nimotuzumab are being investigated (52-55). In a phase I study of a murine monoclonal antibody against EGFR in nine patients with either glioma or meningioma, treatment was well tolerated, but no radiographic responses were detected (56).

VEGF and VEGFRs mediate angiogenesis in various types of brain tumors (57). VEGF is up-regulated in meningiomas (58) even if, Barresi and Tuccari showed the absence of correlation between VEGF expression and WHO tumor grade (59). Additionally, VEGF plays an important role in the formation of peritumoral edema, which adds to the morbidity associated with these tumors. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds VEGFB inhibiting angiogenesis. Inhibition of VEGF by bevacizumab also affects the tumor vasculature, suppressing new blood vessel growth and the existing vasculature (60). Underlying mechanisms of angiogenesis inhibition include a direct antitumor effect, endothelial cell radiosensitization resulting in damaged tumor vasculature, and improved oxygenation as a result of elimination of tumor vessels and decrease in interstitial pressure (61). In a retrospective review by Lou et al., the utility of bevacizumab-based therapy for recurrent/progressive meningiomas was evaluated. They suggested that bevacizumab led to a response in recurrent meningioma (62). In a recent study about the use of bevacizumab in patients with NF2, the authors disclosed the significant expression of SEMA3, an angiogenesis inhibitor, and the absence of any correlation between expression of VEGF pathway components and tumor microvascular density. The same authors affirmed that the effects of bevacizumab on meningiomas were not clear and the relative effect on response was small, and likely not clinically relevant (63). Additionally, there are currently several ongoing trials incorporating VEGF/VEGFR-directed therapy for patients with recurrent, progressive meningioma, including a multicenter phase II trial combining bevacizumab with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, and separate phase II study evaluating bevacizumab as single agent (NCT00972335 and NCT01125046).

PDGFB is another crucial factor that promotes the recruitment and proliferation of vascular cells. It can induce the transcription and secretion of VEGF. PDGFB and PDGFRB are expressed in meningiomas, and their overexpression correlates with the WHO grade (64). Pfister et al. recently tested the effects of gambogic acid and two tyrosine kinase inhibitors of PDGFRB (sunitinib and tandutinib) on meningiomas in vitro, concluding that these PDGFRB inhibitors inhibit the migration of meningioma cells in vitro (65). Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is an inhibitor of PDGFRA and -B, FMS-related tyrosine kinase 1 (FLT1), and tyrosine-proyein kinase (KIT). Two phase II trials have been reported on the use of imatinib alone and in combination with hydroxyurea, enrolling 23 and 21 patients, respectively. As a single-agent, imatinib was well-tolerated but had no significant activity against recurrent meningiomas. PFS at 6 months for patients with benign meningiomas was 45%, and for those with atypical and malignant meningiomas, it was 0% (66, 67). A recent study evaluated the efficacy of sunitinib in 36 patients with malignant meningioma. The PFS rate was 42%, meeting the primary end-point of the study (68). Gupta et al. reported that nelfinavir, an anti-retroviral drug, can strengthen the efficacy of imatinib therapy (69). Similarly, Johnson et al. described reduced meningioma growth in cell lines exposed to lopinavir, another antiretroviral drug (70). Second-generation PDGF inhibitors such as nilotinib or dasatinib, which are thought to be more potent inhibitors have not been tested on meningioma cells.

In 2006, a study concerning transfection of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI2) mRNA in the malignant meningioma cell line IOMM-Lee evaluated tumor growth in vitro and in vivo suggested that TFPI2 could have therapeutic potential in malignant meningioma (71). Recently, Wilisch-Neumann et al. published a study concerning the impact of the cilengitide, an inhibitor of αvβ5 integrins, on migration, proliferation, and radiosensitization of meningioma cells, analyzing integrin expression in tissue microarrays of human meningiomas and in cell cultures, and subcutaneous and intracranial nude mouse models. The data showed that cilengitide is not likely to achieve major responses against rapidly growing malignant meningiomas, although brain invasion may be reduced because of the strong antimigratory properties of the drug. Its combination with radiotherapy deserved further attention (72).

Tumor-suppressor proteins. A family of membrane-bound proteins known as the Band 4.1 family has been discovered on the cytoplasmic side of the cell membrane (73). Genetic mutations that lead to abnormal function of these proteins are believed to be one of the main causes for meningioma development. Gutmann et al. showed that loss of protein 4.1B appears to be similarly distributed among meningioma grades, again suggesting this to be an early event in the formation of meningiomas (74). Protein 4.1B was revealed to interact with the cell growth regulator protein 14-3-3. Although aggressive meningiomas show reduced levels of 14-3-3 expression, impaired 14-3-3 function has not been shown to affect protein 4.1B function, suggesting that alternative signaling pathways are present (5).

Liu and colleagues studied the expression and role of periostin in meningiomas (75). It seems that periostin and Ki-67 may play a role in predicting the grade and prognosis of meningiomas. Drugs targeting periostin aim at reducing invasion of meningiomas (75). Recently, Zhang et al. disclosed the existence of five genes [NF2, meningioma 1 (MN1), AT rich interactive domain 1B (ARID1B), sema domain (SEMA4D), and mucin 5 (MUC5)] that carry novel protein-altering variations that can be associated with progression of meningioma. They also documented the candidate genes, NF2 and MN1 to be associated with malignant meningioma (75). Recently Burns et al. reported that in vitro AR-42, a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, inhibited proliferation of both Ben-Men-1 and normal meningeal cells by increasing expression of p16 (INK4A), p21(CIP1/WAF1), and p27(KIP1) (72). AR-42 reduced the levels of cyclins D1, E and A, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in meningeal cells while significantly reducing the expression of cyclin B, important for progression through the G2 phase in Ben-Men-1 cells. The differential effect of AR-42 on cell-cycle progression of normal meningeal and meningioma cells may have therapeutic implications (76).

Other Systemic Therapies

Estrogen and progesterone receptor antagonists. Hormonal therapies have received considerable interest following the observation of the high incidence of meningioma in women of reproductive age and the discovery that up to two-thirds of meningiomas express progesterone and androgen receptors (4). In addition, several epidemiological studies have suggested that administration of estrogens and progestins affect women's risk of developing meningioma (77, 78). A phase II study including 19 patients with non-resectable refractory meningiomas showed no efficacy benefit of tamoxifen, an estrogen receptor antagonist, in the inhibition of meningioma growth (79). These findings are possibly due to the relatively infrequent estrogen receptor expression in meningioma. Because of the higher likelihood of progesterone receptor expression in meningiomas, several studies evaluated the role of progesterone receptor antagonists as possible candidate drugs. Initial studies of the anti-progesterone mifepristone (RU486) were promising (80, 81). However, their findings were refuted by a large, prospective multi-center, randomized phase III clinical trial enrolling 180 patients which failed to show any major benefit of mifepristone over placebo (82). These findings might be explained by the fact that this study enrolled patients with meningioma subtypes characterized by reduced expression of progesterone receptors. A recent trial evaluating mifepristone in a pre-selected population with diffuse meningiomatosis highly expressing progesterone receptor demonstrated a significant long-lasting clinical and radiological response or stabilization (83). Taken together, these studies suggest that potential sub-groups of patients with meningioma are more likely to benefit from mifepristone and support its use in further prospective clinical trials of preselected populations.

Somatostatin receptor agonists. Somatostatins (SSTs) are a family of neuropeptides produced in the hypothalamus involved in a wide range of physiological processes, including neuromodulation and inhibition of secretory processes and cell proliferation (84). Meningiomas are known to have a high frequency of somatostatin receptor expression (up to 90%), especially of the SST2A sub-type, although their functional role remains unclear. Experimental and human studies have evaluated the effect of somatostatin and somatostatin analogs on meningioma growth, with contradictory results (85, 86). A prospective pilot trial of a long-acting somatostatin analog agonist (Sandostatin LAR®) reported a partial radiographic response in 31% of patients with recurrent meningiomas and the PFS at 6 months was 44% (87). Pasireotide (SOM230), a novel long-acting somatostatin analog, has a wider somatostatin receptor spectrum (including sub-types 1, 2, 3, and 5) and has a higher affinity than octreotide. A recently completed randomized phase II clinical trial was designed to evaluate whether pasireotide LAR (SOM230C) prolongs PFS at 6 months in patients with recurrent or progressive meningioma. The study demonstrated that it has limited activity against recurrent meningioma (88).

Interferon-α 2B (IFNα). IFNα is a leukocyte-produced cytokine that has been shown to inhibit meningioma cells in vitro. Very few studies were published that used IFNα for recurrent meningioma showing a modest effect (89, 90). The largest such study was published by Chamberlain and Glantz in 2008 (91). Thirty-five patients with recurrent meningiomas were enrolled. Although the patients did not demonstrate a significant partial or complete radiographic response, IFNα had cytostatic activity, achieving meaningful palliation, as reflected by a 6-month PFS rate of 54%.

MicroRNA. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of short (from 21- to 23) nucleotides that control the expression of many target genes at the post-transcriptional level. They are aberrantly expressed in many types of cancer and play a major role in regulating a large number of pathways. Therapeutic strategies can include direct tumor-suppressive effects, anti-angiogenic effects, anti-metastatic effects, suppression of immune evasion of tumors, and sensitization of tumor cells to classical anticancer treatments. Recent data suggest that the use of miRNA profiling has significant potential as an effective diagnostic and prognostic tool in defining the expression signature of meningiomas. Down-regulation of miR-29c-3p and miR-219-5p were found to be associated with advanced clinical stages of meningioma. In addition, these data showed that high expression of miR-190a and low expression of miR-29c-3p and miR-219-5p correlated significantly with higher recurrence rates in patients with meningioma (92). A recent research study demonstrated a valid antimigratory and antiproliferative function of miR-145 against meningiomas (93). Overexpression of miR-145 in IOMM-Lee meningioma cells resulted in reduced proliferation, increased sensitivity to apoptosis, and reduction of orthotopic tumor growth in nude mice. Moreover, meningioma cells with high miR-145 levels had impaired migratory and invasive potential both in vitro and in vivo (94). A novel experimental study has demonstrated a key role for miR-200a down-regulation in promoting the growth of meningiomas. Reduced levels of miR-200a appear to contribute to tumorigenesis through two pathways mediated by up-regulation of three mRNA targets (94). Recent data confirmed that elevated levels of miR-335 increased cell growth and inhibited cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase in vitro. It is probably that miR-335 plays an essential role in the proliferation of meningioma cells by directly targeting the retinoblastoma gene 1 (Rb1) signaling pathway (95).

Conclusion

The majority of meningiomas are benign with a low risk of recurrence following surgical resection. On the other hand, grade II and III meningiomas have a higher rate of recurrence, despite complete removal with surgery. In addition, there is a small subset of patients with grade I tumors which progress to high-grade pathology when they recur. Initial treatment for symptomatic meningiomas commonly involves surgical resection which may be followed by either external beam radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. However, despite advances in surgery, radiation therapy and radiosurgery, there remains a small subset of patients with meningiomas in whom the disease recurs and in whom the recurrent tumors are refractory to conventional therapies. Progress in identifying effective therapies for these kind of meningioma has been limited by the lack of cell lines and adequate animal models for experimental studies, the heterogeneity of patient populations, and lack of objective response criteria for evaluating treatment. Of particular interest are combination therapies that affect multiple pathways and nanomedicine, which has the advantage of being able to target multiple tumor markers and deliver multiple agents simultaneously addressing the challenges of cancer heterogeneity and adaptive resistance at once. In this field, the development of selective drug-delivery systems to direct the diffusion of drugs, engineered monoclonal antibodies, and other therapeutic molecules into the CNS is very important. Nanotechnologies provide a unique opportunity to combat cancer on the molecular scale through careful engineering of compounds to specifically interact with neoplastic cells. The surface of nanoparticles can be modified to achieve targeted delivery and improved biocompatibility, and various compounds may be encapsulated inside for multiple functions (96-98). Further clinical investigations evaluating novel therapeutic strategies are required and novel aspects of meningioma biology must be addressed.

  • Received August 25, 2015.
  • Revision received September 29, 2015.
  • Accepted October 7, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. CBTRUS
    , Statistical Report: Primary Brain Tumors in the United States, 2004-2008, Hinsdale, IL: Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, 2012.
  2. ↵
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Ohgaki H,
    3. Wiestler OD,
    4. Cavenee WK,
    5. Burger PC,
    6. Scheitauer BW,
    7. Kleihues P
    : The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Acta Neuropathol 114: 97-109, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Perry A,
    2. Stafford SL,
    3. Scheithauer BW,
    4. Suman VJ,
    5. Lohse CM
    : Meningioma Grading: An analysis of histologic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 21: 1455-1465, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lamszus K
    : Meningioma pathology, genetics and biology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 63: 275-286, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Goldsmith B,
    2. McDermott MW
    : Meningioma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17(2): 111-120, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Mawrin C,
    2. Perry A
    : Pathological classification and molecular genetics of meningiomas. J Neurooncol 99(3): 379-391, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Caffo M,
    2. Caruso G,
    3. Galatioto S,
    4. Meli F,
    5. Cacciola F,
    6. Germanò A,
    7. Alafaci C,
    8. Tomasello F
    : Immunohistochemical study of extracellular matrix proteins laminin, fibronectin and type IV collagen in secretory meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 15(7): 806-811, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Stafford SL,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Suman VJ,
    4. Meyer FB,
    5. Scheithauer BW,
    6. Lohse CM,
    7. Shaw EG
    : Primarily resected meningiomas: outcome and prognostic factors in 581 Mayo Clinic patients, 1978 through 1988. Mayo Clin Proc 73(10): 936-942, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Simpson D
    : The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20(1): 22-39, 1957.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Kinjo T,
    2. al-Mefty O,
    3. Kanaan I
    : Grade zero removal of supratentorial convexity meningiomas. Neurosurgery 33(3): 394-399, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Borovich B,
    2. Doron Y
    : Recurrence of intracranial meningiomas: the role played by regional multicentricity. J Neurosurg 64(1): 58-63, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kamitani H,
    2. Masuzawa H,
    3. Kanazawa I,
    4. Kubo T
    : Recurrence of convexity meningiomas: tumor cells in the arachnoid membrane. Surg Neurol 56(4): 228-235, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Bie L,
    2. Zhao G,
    3. Ju Y,
    4. Zhang B
    : Integrative genomic analysis identifies CCNB1 and CDC2 as candidate genes associated with meningioma recurrence. Cancer Genet 204: 536-540, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Perez-Magan E,
    2. Rodrıguez de Lope A,
    3. Ribalta T,
    4. Ruano Y,
    5. Campos-Martin Y,
    6. Perz-Bautista G
    : Differential expression profiling analyses identifies down-regulation of 1p, 6q and 14q genes and overexpression of 6p histone cluster 1 genes as markers of recurrence in meningiomas. Neuro Oncol 12: 1278-1290, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Bostrom J,
    2. Meyer-Puttlitz B,
    3. Wolter M,
    4. Blaschke B,
    5. Weber RG,
    6. Lichter P,
    7. Ichimura K,
    8. Collins VP,
    9. Reifenberger G
    : Alterations of the tumor suppressor genes CDKN2A (p16(INK4a)), p14(ARF), CDKN2B (p15(INK4b)) and CDKN2C (p18(INK4c)) in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. Am J Pathol 159: 661-669, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kamei Y,
    2. Watanabe M,
    3. Nakayama K,
    4. Kanamaru K,
    5. Waga S,
    6. Shiraishi T
    : Prognostic significance of p53 and p21WAF1/CIP1 immunoreactivity and tumor micronecrosis for recurrence of meningiomas. J Neurooncol 46: 205-213, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Korshunov A,
    2. Shishkina L,
    3. Golanov A
    : DNA topoisomerase IIα and cyclin A immunoexpression in meningiomas and its prognostic significance: an analysis of 263 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 126: 1079-1086, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Ho DM,
    2. Hsu CY,
    3. Ting LT,
    4. Chiang H
    : Histopathology and MIB-1 labeling index predicted recurrence of meningiomas: a proposal of diagnostic criteria for patients with atypical meningioma. Cancer 94: 1538-1547, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Ayerbe J,
    2. Lobato RG,
    3. de la Cruz J,
    4. Alday R,
    5. Rivas JJ,
    6. Gomez PA,
    7. Cabrera A
    : Risk factors predicting recurrence in patients operated on for intracranial meningioma. A multivariate analysis. Acta Neurochir 141(9): 921-932, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lin CK,
    2. Tsai WC,
    3. Lin YC,
    4. Hueng DY
    : Osteopontin predicts the behavior of atypical meningioma. Histopathology 60: 320-325, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Mirimanoff RO,
    2. Dosoretz DE,
    3. Linggood RM,
    4. Ojemann RG,
    5. Martuza RL
    : Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. J Neurosurg 62(1): 18-24, 1985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Walcott BP,
    2. Nahed BV,
    3. Brastianos PK,
    4. Loeffler JS
    : Radiation treatment for WHO grade II and III meningiomas. Front Oncol 3: 227, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Aghi MK,
    2. Carter BS,
    3. Cosgrove GR,
    4. Ojemann RG,
    5. Amin-Hanjani S,
    6. Martuza RL,
    7. Curry WT Jr.,
    8. Barker FG 2nd.
    : Long-term recurrence rates of atypical meningiomas after gross total resection with or without postoperative adjuvant radiation. Neurosurgery 64(1): 56-60, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Ding D,
    2. Xu Z,
    3. McNeill IT,
    4. Yen CP,
    5. Sheehan JP
    : Radiosurgery for parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas. J Neurosurg 119(4): 871-877, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Starke RM,
    2. Williams BJ,
    3. Hiles C,
    4. Nguyen JH,
    5. Elsharkawy MY,
    6. Sheehan JP
    : Gamma knife surgery for skull base meningiomas. J Neurosurg 116(3): 588-597, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Flickinger JC,
    2. Kondziolka D,
    3. Maitz AH,
    4. Lunsford LD
    : Gamma-knife radiosurgery of imaging-diagnosed intracranial meningioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56: 801-806, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Ojemann SG,
    2. Sneed PK,
    3. Larson DA,
    4. Gutin PH,
    5. Berger MS,
    6. Vehrey L,
    7. Smith V,
    8. Petti P,
    9. Wara W,
    10. Park E,
    11. McDermott MW
    : Radiosurgery for malignant meningioma: Results in 22 patients. J Neurosurg 93(suppl 3): 62-67, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Vogelbaum MA,
    2. Leland Rogers C,
    3. Linskey MA,
    4. Mehta MP
    : Opportunities for clinical research in meningioma. J Neurooncol 99(3): 417-422, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Sherman WJ,
    2. Raizer JJ
    : Chemotherapy: What is its role in meningioma? Expert Rev Neurother 12(10): 1189-1195, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Chamberlain MC,
    2. Tsao-Wei DD,
    3. Groshen S
    : Temozolomide for treatment-resistant recurrent meningioma. Neurology 62(7): 1210-1212, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. de Robles P,
    2. McIntyre J,
    3. Kalra S,
    4. Roldan G,
    5. Cairncross G,
    6. Forsyth P,
    7. Magliocco T,
    8. Hamilton M,
    9. Easaw J
    : Methylation status of MGMT gene promoter in meningiomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 187(1): 25-27, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Schrell UM,
    2. Rittig MG,
    3. anders M,
    4. Kiesewetter F,
    5. Marschalek R,
    6. Koch UH,
    7. Fahlbusch R
    : Hydroxyurea for treatment of unresectable and recurrent meningiomas. I. Inhibition of primary human meningioma cells in culture and in meningioma transplants by induction of the apoptotic pathway. J Neurosurg 86(5): 845-852, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Chamberlain MC,
    2. Johnston SK
    : Hydroxyurea for recurrent surgery and radiation refractory meningioma: a retrospective case series. J Neurooncol 104(3): 765-771, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Jensen RL,
    2. Wurster RD
    : Calcium channel antagonists inhibit growth of subcutaneous xenograft meningiomas in nude mice. Surg Neurol 55(5): 275-283, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Ragel BT,
    2. Gillespie DL,
    3. Kushnir V,
    4. Polevaya N,
    5. Kelly D,
    6. Jensen RL
    : Calcium channel antagonists augment hydroxyurea- and ru486-induced inhibition of meningioma growth in vivo and in vitro. Neurosurgery 59(5): 1109-1121, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Reardon DA,
    2. Norden AD,
    3. Desjardins A,
    4. Vredenburgh JJ,
    5. Herndon JJ 2nd.,
    6. Coan A,
    7. Sampson JH,
    8. Gururangan S,
    9. Peters KB,
    10. McLendon RE,
    11. Norfleet JA,
    12. Lipp ES,
    13. Drappatz J,
    14. Wen PY,
    15. Friedman HS
    : Phase II study of Gleevec(R) plus hydroxyurea (HU) in adults with progressive or recurrent meningioma. J Neurooncol 106(2): 409-415, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Picard S,
    2. Titier K,
    3. Etienne G,
    4. Teilhet E,
    5. Ducint D,
    6. Bernard MA,
    7. Lassalle R,
    8. Marit G,
    9. Reiffers J,
    10. Begaud B,
    11. Moore N,
    12. Molimard M,
    13. Mahon FX
    : Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 109(8): 3496-3499, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Preusser M,
    2. Spiegl-Kreinecker S,
    3. Lotsch D,
    4. Wohrer A,
    5. Schmook M,
    6. Dieckmann K,
    7. Saringer W,
    8. Marosi C,
    9. Berger W
    : Trabectedin has promising antineoplastic activity in high-grade meningioma. Cancer 118(20): 5038-5049, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Gupta V,
    2. Su YS,
    3. Samuelson CG,
    4. Liebes LF,
    5. Chamberlain MC,
    6. Hofman FM,
    7. Schonthal AH,
    8. Chen TC
    : Irinotecan: a potential new chemotherapeutic agent for atypical or malignant meningiomas. J Neurosurg 106(3): 455-462, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Curic S,
    2. Wu Y,
    3. Shan B,
    4. Schaaf C,
    5. Utpadel D,
    6. Lange M,
    7. Kuhlen D,
    8. Perone MJ,
    9. Arzt E,
    10. Stalla GK,
    11. Renner U
    : Curcumin acts antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic in human meningiomas. J Neurooncol 113(3): 385-396, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Park YS,
    2. Lee JH,
    3. Harwalkar JA,
    4. Bondar J,
    5. Safayhi H,
    6. Golubic M
    : Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid (AKBA) is cytotoxic for meningioma cells and inhibits phosphorylation of the extracellular-signal regulated kinase 1 and 2. Adv Exp Med Biol 507: 387-393, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Caruso G,
    2. Caffo M,
    3. Raudino G,
    4. Alafaci C,
    5. Salpietro FM,
    6. Tomasello F
    : Antisense oligonucleotides as an innovative therapeutic strategy in the treatment of high-grade gliomas. Rec Pat CNS Drug Discov 5(1): 53-69, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Caruso G,
    2. Caffo M
    : Antisense oligonucleotides in the treatment of cerebral gliomas. Review of concerning patents. Rec Pat CNS Drug Discov 9(1): 2-12, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Perry A,
    2. Gutmann DH,
    3. Reifenberger G
    : Molecular pathogenesis of meningiomas. J Neurooncol 70(2): 183-202, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Johnson MD,
    2. Woodard A,
    3. Kim P,
    4. Frexes-Steed M
    : Evidence for mitogen-associated protein kinase activation and transduction of mitogenic signals by platelet-derived growth factor in human meningioma cells. J Neurosurg 94(2): 293-300, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Barresi V,
    2. Vitarelli E,
    3. Tuccari G,
    4. Barresi G
    : MMP-9 expression in meningiomas: a prognostic marker for recurrence risk? J Neurooncol 102(2): 189-96, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Tummalapalli P,
    2. Spomar D,
    3. Gondi CS,
    4. Olivero WC,
    5. Gujrati M,
    6. Dinh DH,
    7. Rao JS
    : RNAi-mediated abrogation of cathepsin B and MMP9 gene expression in a malignant meningioma cell line leads to decreased tumor growth, invasion and angiogenesis. Int J Oncol 31(5): 1039-1050, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Stamenkovic I,
    2. Yu Q
    : Merlin, a “magic” linker between extracellular cues and intracellular signaling pathways that regulate cell motility, proliferation and survival. Curr Protein Pept Sci 11(6): 471-484, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Johnson M,
    2. Toms S
    : Mitogenic signal transduction pathways in meningiomas: Novel targets for meningioma chemotherapy? J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64(12): 1029-1036, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Pachow D,
    2. andrae N,
    3. Kliese N,
    4. Angenstein F,
    5. Stork O,
    6. Wilisch-Neumann A,
    7. Kirches E,
    8. Mawrin C
    : mTORC1 inhibitors suppress meningioma growth in mouse models. Clin Cancer Res 19(5): 1180-1189, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Norden AD,
    2. Raizer JJ,
    3. Abrey LE,
    4. Lamborn KR,
    5. Lassman AB,
    6. Chang SM,
    7. Yung WK,
    8. Gilbert MR,
    9. Fine HA,
    10. Mehta M,
    11. Deangelis LM,
    12. Cloughesy TF,
    13. Robins HI,
    14. Aldape K,
    15. Dancey J,
    16. Prados MD,
    17. Lieberman F,
    18. Wen PY
    : Phase II trials of erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with recurrent meningioma. J Neurooncol 96(2): 211-217, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Rivera F,
    2. Vega-Villegas ME,
    3. Lopez-Brea MF,
    4. Marquez R
    : current situation of panitumumab, matuzumab, nimotuzumab and zalutumumab. Acta Oncol 47(1): 9-19, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schmiedel J,
    2. Blaukat A,
    3. Li S,
    4. Knochel T,
    5. Ferguson KM
    : matuzumab binding to egfr prevents the conformational rearrangement required for dimerization. Cancer Cell 13(4): 365-373, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Luwor RB,
    2. Johns TG,
    3. Murone C,
    4. Huang HJ,
    5. Cavenee WK,
    6. Ritter G,
    7. Old LJ,
    8. Burgess AW,
    9. Scott AM
    : Monoclonal antibody 806 inhibits the growth of tumor xenografts expressing either the de2-7 or amplified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) but not wild-type EGFR. Cancer Res 61(14): 5355-5361, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Graeven U,
    2. Kremer B,
    3. Sudhoff T,
    4. Killing B,
    5. Rojo D,
    6. Weber D,
    7. Tillner J,
    8. Unal C,
    9. Schmiegel W
    : Phase I study of the humanised anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody matuzumab (EMD 72000) combined with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 94(9): 1293-1299, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Crombet T,
    2. Torres O,
    3. Rodriguez V,
    4. Menendez A,
    5. Stevenson A,
    6. Ramos M,
    7. Torres F,
    8. Figueredo R,
    9. Veitia I,
    10. Iznaga N,
    11. Perez R,
    12. Lage A
    : Phase I clinical evaluation of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor in advanced brain tumor patients: preliminary study. Hybridoma 20(2): 131-136, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Huang H,
    2. Held-Feindt J,
    3. Buhl R,
    4. Mehdorn HM,
    5. Mentlein R
    : Expression of VEGF and its receptors in different brain tumors. Neurol Res 27(4): 371-377, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Yamazaki Y,
    2. Morita T
    : Molecular and functional diversity of vascular endothelial growth factors. Mol Divers 10(4): 515-527, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Barresi V,
    2. Tuccari G
    : Increased ratio of vascular endothelial growth factor to semaphorin3A is a negative prognostic factor in human meningiomas. Neuropathology 30(5): 537-546, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Caffo M,
    2. Barresi V,
    3. Caruso G,
    4. Cutugno M,
    5. La Fata G,
    6. Venza M,
    7. Alafaci C,
    8. Tomasello F
    : Innovative therapeutic strategies in the treatment of brain metastases. Int J Mol Sci 14(1): 2135-2174, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Winkler F,
    2. Kozin SV,
    3. Tong RT,
    4. Chae SS,
    5. Booth MF,
    6. Garkavtsev I,
    7. Xu L,
    8. Hicklin DJ,
    9. Fukumura D,
    10. di Tomaso E,
    11. Munn LL,
    12. Jain RK
    : Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1 and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell 6(6): 553-563, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Lou E,
    2. Sumrall AL,
    3. Turner S,
    4. Peters KB,
    5. Desjardins A,
    6. Vredenburgh JJ,
    7. McLendon RE,
    8. Herndon JE 2nd.,
    9. McSherry F,
    10. Norfleet J,
    11. Friedman HS,
    12. Reardon DA
    : Bevacizumab therapy for adults with recurrent/progressive meningioma: a retrospective series. J Neurooncol 109(1): 63-70, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Nunes FP,
    2. Merker VL,
    3. Jennings D,
    4. Caruso PA,
    5. di Tomaso E,
    6. Muzikansky A,
    7. Barker2nd FA,
    8. Stemmer-Rachamimov A,
    9. Plotkin SR
    : Bevacizumab treatment for meningiomas in NF2: a retrospective analysis of 15 patients. PLoS One 8(3): e59941, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Yang SY,
    2. Xu GM
    : Expression of PDGF and its receptor as well as their relationship to proliferating activity and apoptosis of meningiomas in human meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 8(Suppl 1): 49-453, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Pfister C,
    2. Pfrommer H,
    3. Tatagiba MS,
    4. Roser F
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor signals through platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in meningiomas in vitro. Br J Cancer 107(10): 1702-1713, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Mason WP,
    2. Gentili F,
    3. Macdonald DR,
    4. Hariharan S,
    5. Cruz CR,
    6. Abrey LE
    : Stabilization of disease progression by hydroxyurea in patients with recurrent or unresectable meningioma. J Neurosurg 97(2): 341-346, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Newton HB,
    2. Scott SR,
    3. Volpi C
    : Hydroxyurea chemotherapy for meningiomas: enlarged cohort with extended follow-up. Br J Neurosurg 18(5): 495-499, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Kaley TJ,
    2. Wen P,
    3. Schiff D,
    4. Ligon K,
    5. Haidar S,
    6. Karimi S,
    7. Lassman AB,
    8. Nolan CP,
    9. DeAngelis LM,
    10. Gavrilovic I,
    11. Norden A,
    12. Drappatz J,
    13. Lee EQ,
    14. Purow B,
    15. Plotkin SR,
    16. Batchelor T,
    17. Abrey LE,
    18. Omuro A
    : Phase II trial of sunitinib for recurrent and progressive atypical and anaplastic meningioma. Neuro Oncol 17(1): 116-121, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Gupta V,
    2. Samuleson CG,
    3. Su S,
    4. Chen TC
    : Nelfinavir potentiation of imatinib cytotoxicity in meningioma cells via survivin inhibition. Neurosurg Focus 23(4): E9, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Johnson MD,
    2. O'Connell M,
    3. Pilcher W
    : Lopinavir inhibits meningioma cell proliferation by AKT-independent mechanism. J Neurooncol 101(3): 441-448, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Kondraganti S,
    2. Gondi CS,
    3. Gujrati M,
    4. McCutcheon I,
    5. Dinh DH,
    6. Rao JS,
    7. Olivero WC
    : Restoration of tissue factor pathway inhibitor inhibits invasion and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo in a malignant meningioma cell line. Int J Oncol 29(1): 25-32, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Wilisch-Neumann A,
    2. Kliese N,
    3. Pachow D,
    4. Schneider T,
    5. Warnke JP,
    6. Braunsdorf WE,
    7. Bohmer FD,
    8. Hass P,
    9. Pasemann D,
    10. Helbing C,
    11. Kirches E,
    12. Mawrin C
    : The integrin inhibitor cilengitide affects meningioma cell motility and invasion. Clin Cancer Res 19(19): 5402-5412, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Gutmann DH,
    2. Donahoe J,
    3. Perry A,
    4. Lemke N,
    5. Gorse K,
    6. Kittiniyom K,
    7. Rempel SAQ,
    8. Gutierrez JA,
    9. Newsham IF
    : Loss of DAL-1, a protein 4.1-related tumor suppressor, is an important early event in the pathogenesis of meningiomas. Hum Mol Genet 9(10): 1495-1500, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Shi J,
    3. Chen M,
    4. Cao YF,
    5. Liu YW,
    6. Pan J,
    7. Qi ST
    : Periostin: a novel prognostic predictor for meningiomas. J Neurooncol 121(3): 505-512, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Haying J,
    3. Yao L
    : Exome sequencing on malignant meningiomas identified mutations in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and meningioma 1 (MN1) genes. Discov Med 18(101): 301-311, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Burns SS,
    2. Akhmametyeva EM,
    3. Oblinger JL,
    4. Bush ML,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Senner V,
    7. Chen CS,
    8. Jacob A,
    9. Welling DB,
    10. Chang LS
    : Histone deacetylase inhibitor AR-42 differentially affects cell-cycle transit in meningeal and meningioma cells, potently inhibiting NF2-deficient meningioma growth. Cancer Res 73(2): 792-803, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Andersen L,
    2. Friis S,
    3. Hallas J,
    4. Ravn P,
    5. Schroder HD,
    6. Gaist D
    : Hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of cranial meningioma. Eur J Cancer 49(15): 3303-3310, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Benson VS,
    2. Kirichek O,
    3. Beral V,
    4. Green J
    : Menopausal hormone therapy and central nervous system tumor risk: Large UK prospective study and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 136(10): 2369-2377, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Goodwin JW,
    2. Crowley J,
    3. Eyre HJ,
    4. Stafford B,
    5. Jaeckle KA,
    6. Townsend JJ
    : A phase II evaluation of tamoxifen in unresectable or refractory meningiomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Neurooncol 15(1): 75-77, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Grunberg SM,
    2. Weiss MH,
    3. Spitz IM,
    4. Ahmadi J,
    5. Sadun A,
    6. Russell CA,
    7. Lucci L,
    8. Stevenson LL
    : Treatment of unresectable meningiomas with the antiprogesterone agent mifepristone. J Neurosurg 74(6): 861-866, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Lamberts SW,
    2. Tanghe HL,
    3. Avezaat CJ,
    4. Braakman R,
    5. Wijngaarde R,
    6. Koper JW,
    7. de Jong H
    : Mifepristone (RU 486) treatment of meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55(6): 486-490, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    1. Grunberg SM,
    2. Weiss MH,
    3. Russell CA,
    4. Spitz IM,
    5. Ahmadi J,
    6. Sadun A,
    7. Sitruk-Ware R
    : Long-term administration of mifepristone (RU486): clinical tolerance during extended treatment of meningioma. Cancer Invest 24(8): 727-733, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Touat M,
    2. Lombardi G,
    3. Farina P,
    4. Kalamarides M,
    5. Sanson M
    : Successful treatment of multiple intracranial meningiomas with the antiprogesterone receptor agent mifepristone (RU486). Acta Neurochir 156(10): 1831-1835, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Lamberts SW,
    2. van der Lely AJ,
    3. de Herder WW,
    4. Hofland LJ
    : Somatostatin analogs: future directions. Metabolism 45(8) Suppl 1: 104-106, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Schulz S,
    2. Pauli SU,
    3. Schulz S,
    4. Handel M,
    5. Dietzmann K,
    6. Firsching R,
    7. Hollt V
    : Immunohistochemical determination of five somatostatin receptors in meningioma reveals frequent overexpression of somatostatin receptor subtype SST2A. Clin Cancer Res 6(5): 1865-1874, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Arena S,
    2. Barbieri F,
    3. Thellung S,
    4. Pirani P,
    5. Corsaro A,
    6. Villa V,
    7. Dadati P,
    8. Dorcaratto A,
    9. Lapertosa G,
    10. Ravetti JL,
    11. Spaziante R,
    12. Schettini G,
    13. Florio T
    : Expression of somatostatin receptor mRNA in human meningiomas and their implication in in vitro antiproliferative activity. J Neurooncol 66(1-2): 155-166, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Chamberlain MC,
    2. Glantz MJ,
    3. Fadul CE
    : Recurrent meningioma: salvage therapy with long-acting somatostatin analogue. Neurology 69(10): 969-973, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Norden AD,
    2. Ligon KL,
    3. Hammond SN,
    4. Muzikansky A,
    5. Reardon DA,
    6. Kaley TJ,
    7. Batchelor TT,
    8. Plotkin SR,
    9. Raizer JJ,
    10. Wong ET,
    11. Drappatz J,
    12. Lesser GJ,
    13. Haidar S,
    14. Beroukhim R,
    15. Lee EQ,
    16. Doherty L,
    17. Lafrankie D,
    18. Gaffey SC,
    19. Gerard M,
    20. Smith KH,
    21. McCluskey C,
    22. Phuphanich S,
    23. Wen PY
    : Phase II study of monthly pasireotide LAR (SOM230C) for recurrent or progressive meningioma. Neurology 84(3): 280-286, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Muhr C,
    2. Gudjonsson O,
    3. Lilja A,
    4. Hartman M,
    5. Zhang ZJ,
    6. Langstrom B
    : Meningioma treated with interferon-alpha, evaluated with [(11)C]-L-methionine positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res 7(8): 2269-2276, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. ↵
    1. Kaba Se,
    2. De Monte F,
    3. Bruner JM,
    4. Kyritsis AP,
    5. Jaeckle KA,
    6. Levin V,
    7. Yung WK
    : The treatment of recurrent unresectable and malignant meningiomas with interferon alpha-2B. Neurosurgery 40(2): 271-275, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Chamberlain MC,
    2. Glantz MJ
    : Interferon-alpha for recurrent World Health Organization grade 1 intracranial meningiomas. Cancer 113(8): 2146-2151, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Zhi F,
    2. Zhou G,
    3. Wang S,
    4. Shi Y,
    5. Peng Y,
    6. Shao N,
    7. Guan W,
    8. Qu H,
    9. Zhang Y,
    10. Wang Q,
    11. Yang C,
    12. Wang R,
    13. Wu S,
    14. Xia X,
    15. Yang Y
    : A microRNA expression signature predicts meningioma recurrence. Int J Cancer 132(1): 128-136, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Kliese N,
    2. Gobrecht P,
    3. Pachow D,
    4. andrae N,
    5. Wilisch-Neumann A,
    6. Kirches M,
    7. Riek-Burchardt M,
    8. Angenstein F,
    9. Reifenberger G,
    10. Riemenschneider MJ,
    11. Meese E,
    12. Panayotova-Dimitrova D,
    13. Gutmann DH,
    14. Mawrin C
    : miRNA-145 is downregulated in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas and negatively regulates motility and proliferation of meningioma cell. Oncogene 32(39): 4712-4720, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Saydam O,
    2. Shen Y,
    3. Wuürdinger T,
    4. Senol O,
    5. Boke E,
    6. James MF,
    7. Tannous BA,
    8. Stemmer-Rachamimov AO,
    9. Yi M,
    10. Stephens RM,
    11. Fraefel C,
    12. Gusella JF,
    13. Krichevsky AM,
    14. Breakefield XO
    : Down-regulated microRNA-200a in meningiomas promotes tumor growth by reducing E-cadherin and activating the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 29(21): 5923-5940, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Shi L,
    2. Jiang D,
    3. Sun G,
    4. Wan Y,
    5. Zhang S,
    6. Zeng Y,
    7. Pan T,
    8. Wang Z
    : miR-335 promotes cell proliferation by directly targeting Rb1 in meningiomas. J Neurooncol 110(2): 155-162, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Caruso G,
    2. Raudino G,
    3. Caffo M,
    4. Alafaci C,
    5. Granata F,
    6. Lucerna S,
    7. Salpietro FM,
    8. Tomasello F
    : Nanotechnology platforms in diagnosis and treatment of primary brain tumors. Rec Pat Nanotechnol 4(2): 119-124, 2010.
    OpenUrl
    1. Caruso G,
    2. Caffo M,
    3. Raudino G,
    4. Alafaci C,
    5. Cafarella D,
    6. Lucerna S,
    7. Salpietro FM,
    8. Tomasello F
    : Could nanoparticle systems play a role in the treatment of cerebral gliomas? Nanomedicine: NBM 7(6): 744-752, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Caruso G,
    2. Marino D,
    3. Caffo M
    : Nanoparticles and CNS delivery of therapeutic agents in the treatment of primary brain tumors. J Analyt Oncol 3(2): 105-112, 2014.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 35 (12)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 12
December 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Innovative Therapeutic Strategies in the Treatment of Meningioma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Innovative Therapeutic Strategies in the Treatment of Meningioma
GERARDO CARUSO, SAMER K. ELBABAA, PABLO GONZALEZ-LOPEZ, VALERIA BARRESI, MARCELLO PASSALACQUA, MARIA CAFFO
Anticancer Research Dec 2015, 35 (12) 6391-6400;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Innovative Therapeutic Strategies in the Treatment of Meningioma
GERARDO CARUSO, SAMER K. ELBABAA, PABLO GONZALEZ-LOPEZ, VALERIA BARRESI, MARCELLO PASSALACQUA, MARIA CAFFO
Anticancer Research Dec 2015, 35 (12) 6391-6400;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Current Treatments
    • Targeted Therapies
    • Other Systemic Therapies
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Meningiomas and Proteomics: Focus on New Potential Biomarkers and Molecular Pathways
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal Treatment of Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer
  • Integrated Treatment of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: A Descriptive Review of the State of the Art
  • Cytokine-based Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities for IL-10
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • meningioma
  • nanomedicine
  • surgery
  • targeted therapies
  • treatment
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire