Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Lymphatic Vascularization in Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Tumor Grade, Androgen Withdrawal and Prognosis

MARIA R. AMBROSIO, BRUNO J. ROCCA, AURORA BARONE, ALESSANDRO GINORI, FILIPPO CRIVELLI, LUIGI PIRTOLI and MARIA T. DEL VECCHIO
Anticancer Research October 2015, 35 (10) 5595-5600;
MARIA R. AMBROSIO
1Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Section of Pathology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maradot@libero.it
BRUNO J. ROCCA
1Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Section of Pathology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
2Pathology Unit, Ospedale di Circolo di Busto Arsizio, Presidio Ospedaliero di Saronno, Saronno, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AURORA BARONE
1Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Section of Pathology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALESSANDRO GINORI
1Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Section of Pathology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FILIPPO CRIVELLI
2Pathology Unit, Ospedale di Circolo di Busto Arsizio, Presidio Ospedaliero di Saronno, Saronno, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUIGI PIRTOLI
3Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Section of Pathology and Radiological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA T. DEL VECCHIO
3Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Section of Pathology and Radiological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The lymphatic system plays an active role in the metastatic process by directly facilitating recruitment of cancer cells into the vessels. The present study aimed to assess the lymphatic vessel area and the lymphatic vessel density in prostate adenocarcinoma and to correlate these parameters with patients prognosis and outcome. Patients and Methods: The lymphatic vessel area and the lymphatic vessel density were evaluated using the D2-40 monoclonal antibody in 153 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who had been treated by radical prostatectomy, in comparison to 152 non-neoplastic controls. We also estimated the lymphatic vessel area in a set of 139 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant treatment with combined androgen blockade. Results: Lymphatic vessel area was higher in periglandular than in interglandular stroma, inversely correlated with tumor differentiation (in untreated patients) and was influenced by hormonal treatment. Lymphatic vessel density was not significantly different between the non-tumoral and the high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasm compartment, whereas it was higher in tumoral than in non-tumoral compartments, mainly in periglandular stroma. In addition, it increased in parallel to the tumor grade progression and positively correlated with all the main prognostic factors of prostate adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: The evaluation of lymphatic vessel density on radical prostatectomy with positive nodes may help to discriminate those patients at higher risk of developing an aggressive disease, which may need early androgen deprivation therapy to delay the worsening of clinical disease.

  • Prostate adenocarcinoma
  • lymphatic vessel density
  • combined androgen blockade therapy

Most deaths from cancer are the result of metastasis (1). Metastatic tumor spread occurs, at least in the early stages, through the lymphatic path by lymphoangiogenesis (2,3). Lymphatic vessels are characterized by poorly developed junctions and large inter-endothelial gaps, thus being susceptible to tumor cell invasion (4, 5). Patients with lymph node metastasis exhibit significantly decreased disease-specific and biochemical recurrence-free survival rates (1, 8). Organ-confined prostate adenocarcinoma (PAC) is curable in most cases by surgery or radiation therapy, and the prognosis for these patients is excellent (6). Advanced and metastatic disease are associated with high morbidity and mortality (7) due to the development of castration resistance. A number of morphological studies have examined the relationship between lymphangiogenesis and PAC (9, 10). However, these studies were carried out on small series of patients and produced conflicting results regarding whether lymphatic vessels are involved in tumor progression.

The present study aimed at clarifying lymphatic vascularization in PAC samples, analyzing the effect of androgens and of androgen inhibition on prostate vascularization, and at assessing the correlation between lymphatic vessel density (LVD) and the main clinicopathological factors of PAC. Increased knowledge on PAC pathogenesis may give rise to new therapeutic targets and prognostic markers.

Patients and Methods

Prostate tissue samples. Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Siena (Italy). The study was performed on 292 radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with PAC, collected between January 1999 and December 2003. Of these patients, 153 had been treated by radical prostatectomy (hereafter referred to as untreated patients) and 139 had undergone radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant treatment with combined androgen blockade therapy (CAB) for three months (hereafter referred to as treated patients). The non-neoplastic controls were represented by 102 specimens from peripheral zone of the prostate of patients undergoing cysto-prostatectomy for bladder cancer but without cancer in the prostate gland. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 69 years (range=55 to 79 years). The following biochemical and pathological parameters were recorded: total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) level, Gleason score (only on surgical specimens from untreated patients), surgical margins infiltration, extra-prostatic extension, seminal vesicles invasion, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage (according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Seventh Edition (11). The clinicopathological features are summarized in Table I.

Histology. Tissues had been fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and processed according to the standard procedures as previously described (12). Untreated adenocarcinomas were graded according to the updated Gleason grading system by combining the different Gleason pattern (13, 14). Treated adenocarcinomas were classified as good, moderate or poor responders (12, 15).

Immunohistochemistry. The immunohistochemical stainings were performed as previously described (11) using the monoclonal antibody D2-40 (dilution: 1:40; Dako, Milan, Italy). Quantification of LVD was assessed by applying the counting method of Weidner et al. (16). In untreated PAC, LVA and LVD were evaluated separately for each Gleason pattern, whereas in treated PAC, they were assessed depending on the response to treatment.

Morphometric analysis. In each of the neoplastic and non-neoplastic sample, five fields with maximum LVA at a magnification of ×200 were identified using the program LUCIA G (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis. Both univariate (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Fisher exact test and χ2 test), and multivariate analysis, were performed by computing the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval for each prognostic factor, and considering a p-value of 0.05 or less as statistically significant.

Results

Evaluation of LVA. LVA was higher in the periglandular than in the interglandular stroma in all the neoplastic and non-neoplastic compartments examined (p<0.001). Specifically, periglandular LVA (mean±SD) was higher in non-neoplastic than in high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and neoplastic specimens (7784±664 μm2 vs. 5447±664 μm2 vs. 2138±526 μm2 in untreated patients; 4092±507 μm2 vs. 1535±292 μm2 vs. 1626±268 μm2 in treated patients) (p<0.05). LVA inversely correlated with Gleason pattern (Gleason 3=3828±609 μm2, Gleason 4=1512±591 μm2, Gleason 5=1075±378 μm2; p<0.01) in untreated patients, and with response to treatment (2108±285 μm2 in poor, 1657±339 μm2 in moderate, 1113±180 μm2 in good responders) in treated patients (p<0.05). Interglandular LVA significantly decreased in the tumoral compartment in comparison with non-neoplastic and HGPIN compartments (p<0.001 for untreated patients, and p<0.05 for treated patients) and inversely correlated with the Gleason pattern (1266±225 μm2 in Gleason 3, 248±80 μm2 in Gleason 4, not measurable in Gleason 5) in untreated patients (p<0.001), but was not correlated with the response to treatment in treated patients (p=0.4) (Figures 1, 2 and 3). A graphic representation of the results is shown in Figure 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological features of the patients.

Evaluation of LVD. LVD was not significantly different between the non-tumoral and the HGPIN compartment [2.01 vs. 1.40/high-power field (HPF); p=0.11], whereas it was higher in tumoral than in non-tumoral compartments (3.59 vs. 2.01/HPF; p<0.005). In tumoral compartments, interglandular LVD was lower than the periglandular (p<0.001). Periglandular LVD increased with tumor pattern (Gleason pattern 3=2.33; Gleason pattern 4=2.6; Gleason pattern 5=3.6/HPF; p<0.001). In lymph node-positive cases, LVD was significantly higher than in node-negative cases (mean 3.5 vs. 2.4/HPF; p<0.001) (Figure 5).

Association of LVD with the prognostic factors of prostatic carcinoma. LVD was significantly associated with higher stage (p<0.001) and Gleason score (p<0.001); surgical margin infiltration (p<0.001), extra-prostatic extension (p<0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p<0.001), and lymph node metastases (p<0.001). No correlation was identified with the age of the patients (p=0.62) and the preoperative PSA (p=0.570). The patients with higher LVD had a shorter DFS [mean=35.61 months (95% confidence interval=1-99 months) vs. 69.28 months (reference=13-144 months); log-rank test, p<0.001]. Univariate Cox analysis showed that all the prognostic factors of PAC statistically correlated with disease-free survival (p<0.001) except for age (p=0.73). Stepwise multivariate analysis enrolling the above parameters and the LVD identified Gleason score, extra-prostatic extension and LVD as the three major discriminant prognostic factors in PAC (HRs of 2.06, 22.7 and 57.2, respectively; p<0.001).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Lymphatic vessel area in non-neoplastic (A) and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm (B) samples. No significant difference between specimens is apparent. D2-40 stain. Original magnification: ×20.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Lymphatic vessel area in untreated patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. A: In interglandular stroma, lymphatic vessel area significantly decreases from Gleason pattern 3 (left), to Gleason 4 (middle) and 5 (right) (p<0.001 for Gleason 3 vs Gleason 4 and 5; p<0.01 for Gleason 4 vs. Gleason 5). B: In periglandular stroma, lymphatic vessel area decreases as Gleason pattern increases; in Gleason pattern 5, small lymphatic vessels are still detectable (lower right) (p<0.01). D2-40 stain. Original magnification: ×10.

Discussion

Lymphatic vessels are fundamental components of the immune system and provide interstitial drainage; they are also a route of tumor cell dissemination (5), thanks to their thin walls and discontinuous basement membrane (5). Previous studies carried out on lymphatic vascularization in PAC gave conflicting results (17-22). They had been performed on small series of cases, used different stains for lymphatic vessels and provided information limited to the LVD. In our study of 292 radical prostatectomy specimens and 102 non-neoplastic controls, we evaluated not only the LVD but also the LVA. In samples from untreated patients, we found that LVA and LVD were higher in the periglandular than in the interglandular stroma, supporting the view that metastatic spread occurs mainly via peritumoral lymphatic vessels. The decrease of LVA in neoplastic compared with non-neoplastic and HGPIN specimens may be related to the outgrowth of stromal cells, which is a feature of PAC and, thus, may influence the shape of the lymphatic vessels walk. In samples from treated patients, we found that LVA was lower in the specimens from good responders than in the samples from poor or moderate responders. It could be postulated that androgen withdrawal inhibits tumor growth by also reducing lymphangiogenesis.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Lymphatic vessel area in treated patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. A: In interglandular stroma, lymphatic vessel area is lower in the specimens from good responders (left), than in those from moderate (middle) and poor responders (right) (p=0.4). B: In periglandular stroma, lymphatic vessel area progressively increases from the specimens from good (left), to moderate (middle), and poor (right) responders (p<0.05). D2-40 stain. Original magnification: ×10.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Lymphatic vessel area in untreated and treated patients. A: Lymphatic vessel area in non-tumoral, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and Gleason pattern (GL) 3 to 5 specimens of untreated patients is shown. B: Lymphatic vessel area in non-tumoral, HGPIN and neoplastic samples of poor (PR), moderate (MR) and good (GR) responders is represented. IS: Interglandular stroma; PS: periglandular stroma.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Lymphatic vessel density in untreated patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. Lymphatic vessel density increases as Gleason pattern (GL) progresses and is higher in lymph nodes (LN)-positive cases than in those with negative LNs (p<0.005).

We also observed that LVD positively correlated with the main clinico-pathological parameters involved in PAC prognosis, and with disease-free survival and lymph node. Based on these finding, one may need to consider aggressive post-surgical management of patients with a high LVD in the PAC surgical specimen (23, 24).

In conclusion, a better understanding of the mechanisms leading to invasiveness and lymphatic metastasis of PAC (25, 26) represents a challenge for tumor vascular biology. Since we have suggested that androgens regulate the prostatic vasculature and that vascularization affects patients outcome, a better-timed and aggressive therapeutic approach by combining early androgen targeted therapy, lymphagiogenesis inhibitors (27), radiotherapy and chemotherapy may inhibit the metastatic spread of neoplastic cells. However, the scenario is even more complicated when considering the tumor heterogeneity for a single prostate cancer patient, which would result in an intro-patient variation.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    None.

  • Received February 25, 2015.
  • Revision received June 4, 2015.
  • Accepted June 8, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Datta K,
    2. Muders M,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Tindall D J
    : Mechanism of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. Future Oncol 6: 823-836, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Stacker SA,
    2. Achen MG,
    3. Jussila L,
    4. Baldwin ME,
    5. Alitalo K
    : Lymphangiogenesis and cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 573-583, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Napoli C,
    2. Giordano A,
    3. Casamassimi A,
    4. Pentimalli F,
    5. Ignarro LJ,
    6. De Nigris F
    : Directed in vivo angiogenesis assay and the study of systemic neoangiogenesis in cancer. Int J Cancer 128: 1505-1508, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Tobler NE,
    2. Detmar M
    : Tumor and lymph node lymphangiogenesis-impact on cancer metastasis. J Leukoc Biol 80: 691-696, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Alitalo K,
    2. Tammela T,
    3. Petrova TV
    : Lymphangiogenesis in development and human disease. Nature 438: 946-953, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Terracciano D,
    2. Mazzarella C,
    3. Di Carlo A,
    4. Mariano A,
    5. Ferro M,
    6. Di Lorenzo G,
    7. Giordano A,
    8. Altieri V,
    9. De Placido S,
    10. Macchia V
    : Effects of the ERBB1/ERBB2 kinase inhibitor GW2974 on androgen-independent prostate cancer PC-3 cell line growt and NSE, chromogranin A and osteopontin content. Oncol Rep 24: 213-217, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Touijer KA,
    2. Mazzola CR,
    3. Sjoberg DD,
    4. Scardino PT,
    5. Eastham JA
    : Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol 65: 20-25, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Center MM,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Ward E,
    6. Forman D
    : Global cancer statistics CA. Cancer J Clin 61: 69-90, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Kaushal V,
    2. Mukunyadzi P,
    3. Dennis RA,
    4. Siegel ER,
    5. Johnson DE,
    6. Kohli M
    : Stage-specific characterization of the vascular endothelial growth factor axis in prostate cancer: expression of lymphangiogenic markers is associated with advanced-stage disease. Clin Cancer Res 11: 584-593, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Coso S,
    2. Williams ED
    : Prostate cancer lymph node metastasis. Open Prost Cancer J 2: 16-31, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Gospodarowicz MK,
    3. Wittekind CH
    (eds.): TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, Seventh Edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2009.
  12. ↵
    1. Rocca BJ,
    2. Ginori A,
    3. Barone A,
    4. Calandra C,
    5. Crivelli F,
    6. De Falco G,
    7. Gazaneo S,
    8. Tripodi S,
    9. Cevenini G,
    10. del Vecchio MT,
    11. Ambrosio MR,
    12. Tosi P
    : Translationally controlled tumor protein in prostatic adenocarcinoma: correlation with tumor grading and treatment-related changes. BioMed Research International 2015: 985950, 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Pierorazio PM,
    2. Walsh PC,
    3. Partin AW,
    4. Epstein J I
    : Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU 111: 753-760, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Egevand L,
    2. Ahmad AS,
    3. Algaba F,
    4. Berney DM,
    5. Boccon-Gibod L,
    6. Compérat E,
    7. Evans AJ,
    8. Griffiths D,
    9. Grobholz R,
    10. Kristiansen G,
    11. Langner C,
    12. Lopez-Beltran A,
    13. Montironi R,
    14. Moss S,
    15. Oliveira P,
    16. Vainer B,
    17. Varma M,
    18. Camparo P
    : Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European Pathologists. Histopathology 62: 247-256, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Montironi R,
    2. Magi-Galluzzi C,
    3. Muzzonigro G,
    4. Prete E,
    5. Polito M,
    6. Fabris G
    : Effects of combination endocrine treatment on normal prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathology 47: 906-913, 1994.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Weidner N,
    2. Semple JP,
    3. Welch WR,
    4. Folkman J
    : Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324: 1-8, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Trojan L,
    2. Michel MS,
    3. Rensch F,
    4. Jackson DG,
    5. Alken P,
    6. Grobholz R
    : Lymph and blood vessel architecture in benign and malignant prostatic tissue: lack of lymphangiogenesis in prostate carcinoma assessed with novel lymphatic marker lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE-1). J Urol 172: 103-107, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Roma AA,
    2. Magi-Galluzzi C,
    3. Kral MA,
    4. Jin TT,
    5. Klein EA,
    6. Zhou M
    : Peritumoral lymphatic invasion is associated with regional lymph node metastases in prostate adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol 19: 392-398, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cheng L,
    2. Zhang S,
    3. Sweeney CJ,
    4. Kao C,
    5. Gardner TA,
    6. Eble JN
    : Androgen withdrawal inhibits tumor growth and is associated with decrease in angiogenesis and VEGF expression in androgen-independent CWR22Rv1 human prostate cancer model. Anticancer Res 24: 2135-2140, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Zeng Y,
    2. Opeskin K,
    3. Horvath LG,
    4. Sutherland RL,
    5. Williams ED
    : Lymphatic vessel density and lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. Prostate 65: 222-230, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kuroda K,
    2. Horiguchi A,
    3. Asano T,
    4. Tasaki S,
    5. Yoshii H,
    6. Sato A,
    7. Asakuma J,
    8. Ito K,
    9. Seguchi K,
    10. Sumitomo M,
    11. Asano T
    : Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using peritumoral lymphatic vessel density in biopsy specimens in patients with localized prostate cancer. Urol Int 88: 18-24, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Liang P,
    2. Hong JW,
    3. Ubukata H,
    4. Liu HR,
    5. Watanabe Y,
    6. Katano M,
    7. Motohashi G,
    8. Kasuga T,
    9. Nakada I,
    10. Tabuchi T
    : Increased density and diameter of lymphatic microvessels correlate with lymph node metastasis in early stage invasive colorectal carcinoma. Virchows Arch 448: 570-575, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Cai T,
    2. Nesi G,
    3. Tinacci G,
    4. Giubilei G,
    5. Gavazzi A,
    6. Mondaini N,
    7. Zini E,
    8. Bartoletti R
    : Clinical importance of lymph node density in predicting outcome of prostate cancer patients. J Surg Res 167: 267-272, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Ahmed A,
    2. Ali S,
    3. Sarkar FH
    : Advances in androgen receptor targeted therapy for prostate cancer. J Cell Physiol 229: 271-276, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Feola A,
    2. Cimini A,
    3. Migliucci F,
    4. Iorio R,
    5. Zuchegna C,
    6. Rothenberger R,
    7. Cito L,
    8. Porcellini A,
    9. Unteregger G,
    10. Tombolini V,
    11. Giordano A,
    12. Di Domenico M
    : The inhibition of p85αPI3KSer83 phosphorylation prevents cell proliferation and invasion in prostate cancer cells. J Cell Biochem 114: 2114-2119, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Fioriti D,
    2. Mischitelli M,
    3. Di Monaco F,
    4. Di Silverio F,
    5. Petrangeli E,
    6. Russo G,
    7. Giordano A,
    8. Pietropaolo V
    : Cancer stem cells in prostate adenocarcinoma: a target for new anticancer strategies. J Cell Physiol 216: 571-575, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Sakamoto S,
    2. Ryan AJ,
    3. Kyprianou N
    : Targeting vasculature in urologic tumors: mechanistic and therapeutic significance. J Cell Biochem 103: 691-708, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 35 (10)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 10
October 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lymphatic Vascularization in Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Tumor Grade, Androgen Withdrawal and Prognosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Lymphatic Vascularization in Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Tumor Grade, Androgen Withdrawal and Prognosis
MARIA R. AMBROSIO, BRUNO J. ROCCA, AURORA BARONE, ALESSANDRO GINORI, FILIPPO CRIVELLI, LUIGI PIRTOLI, MARIA T. DEL VECCHIO
Anticancer Research Oct 2015, 35 (10) 5595-5600;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Lymphatic Vascularization in Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Tumor Grade, Androgen Withdrawal and Prognosis
MARIA R. AMBROSIO, BRUNO J. ROCCA, AURORA BARONE, ALESSANDRO GINORI, FILIPPO CRIVELLI, LUIGI PIRTOLI, MARIA T. DEL VECCHIO
Anticancer Research Oct 2015, 35 (10) 5595-5600;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy of Pembrolizumab as Second or Third-line Therapy for Local Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
  • End-of-life Androgen Deprivation Syndrome With Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Case Report
  • Effect of a Biweekly Dosing Schedule on Severe Neutropenia Induced by Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Colorectal Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate adenocarcinoma
  • lymphatic vessel density
  • combined androgen blockade therapy
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire