Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Prognostic Markers for Patient Outcome Following Vaccination with Multiple MHC Class I/II-restricted WT1 Peptide-pulsed Dendritic Cells Plus Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer

KAZUKI TAKAKURA, SHIGEO KOIDO, SHIN KAN, KOSAKU YOSHIDA, MASAKO MORI, YUTA HIRANO, ZENSHO ITO, HIROKO KOBAYASHI, SHINICHIRO TAKAMI, YOSHIHIRO MATSUMOTO, MIKIO KAJIHARA, TAKEYUKI MISAWA, MASATO OKAMOTO, HARUO SUGIYAMA, SADAMU HOMMA, TOSHIFUMI OHKUSA and HISAO TAJIRI
Anticancer Research January 2015, 35 (1) 555-562;
KAZUKI TAKAKURA
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIGEO KOIDO
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
2Institute of Clinical Medicine and Research, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
3Department of Oncology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shigeo_koido{at}jikei.ac.jp
SHIN KAN
3Department of Oncology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOSAKU YOSHIDA
4Research and Development Division, Tella Inc., Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAKO MORI
4Research and Development Division, Tella Inc., Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUTA HIRANO
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ZENSHO ITO
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROKO KOBAYASHI
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINICHIRO TAKAMI
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIRO MATSUMOTO
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKIO KAJIHARA
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKEYUKI MISAWA
5Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASATO OKAMOTO
6Department of Advanced Immunotherapeutics, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARUO SUGIYAMA
7Department of Functional Diagnostic Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SADAMU HOMMA
3Department of Oncology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOSHIFUMI OHKUSA
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HISAO TAJIRI
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Treatment combining dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with three types of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II (DC/WT1-I/II)-restricted Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) peptides with chemotherapy may stabilize disease in pancreatic cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Laboratory data from seven patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent combined DC/WT1-I/II vaccination and chemotherapy were analyzed. The DC phenotypes and plasma cytokine profiles were analyzed via flow cytometry. Results: The post-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L) ratio was a treatment-related prognostic factor for better survival. Moreover, the mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR and cluster of differentiation (CD)83 on DCs were significantly increased after chemoimmunotherapy. Interestingly, interleukin (IL)-6 level in plasma was significantly increased after chemoimmunotherapy in non-super-responders. Conclusion: An increased N/L ratio, as well as HLA-DR and CD83 MFI levels may be prognostic markers of longer survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who undergo chemoimmunotherapy.

  • Cytokine
  • chemoimmunotherapy
  • dendritic cell
  • MHC class II
  • pancreatic cancer
  • vaccine
  • WT1

Dendritic cells (DCs) are potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that can present tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) in the context of class I and II (MHC-I/II) major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) and the co-stimulatory molecules cluster of differentiation (CD)80 and CD86 (1). TAAs are recognized by CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) in the context of MHC class I (MHC-I) molecules, whereas CD4+ T-cells recognize antigenic peptides in association with MHC class II (MHC-II) molecules (1). Therefore, DCs have been pulsed with various MHC-I-restricted antigenic peptides in clinical studies. However, the antitumor effects of cancer vaccine-targeting CD8+ CTLs have not been investigated as vigorously in clinical trials (2).

CD4+ T-cells are required for the priming, generation and maintenance of TAA-specific CD8+ CTLs (1). Moreover, CD4+ T-cells play a more direct role in antitumor immunity (3, 4). The Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) antigen is highly expressed in various types of tumors, including pancreatic cancer (5), and is an excellent TAA target for cancer vaccines (6, 7). Therefore, we recently investigated the clinical and immunological responses to DCs that were pulsed with multiple MHC class I/II-restricted WT1 peptides (DC/WT1-I/II) in combination with chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer (8).

The treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer via DC/WT1-I/II and chemotherapy resulted in longer survival among patients who exhibited positive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions against the WT1 peptides (8). Moreover, patients with strongly-positive DTH reactions maintained WT1-specific memory CTLs throughout the entire treatment period. Therefore, we suggested that a combination treatment involving DC/WT1-I/II and chemotherapy could lead to disease stability in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (8). In the present study, we analyzed the prognostic markers for the outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent chemoimmunotherapy with DC/WT1-I/II vaccination and chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Study design. The ethics committee of the Jikei Institutional Review Board at the Jikei University School of Medicine and the clinical study committee of Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital (No. 14-60 (3209) and 21-204 (6082)) reviewed and approved this study. All 7 patients with pancreatic cancer provided written informed consent and all procedures were performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. All patients underwent DC/WT1-I/II vaccination and chemotherapy. The laboratory data of patients who underwent chemoimmunotherapy (e.g., C-reactive protein level (CRP), lymphocyte number, neutrophil number, neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L) ratio) were analyzed prior to and after the treatments. The N/L ratio was defined as the ratio of the number of neutrophils to the number of lymphocytes in the blood.

DC-WT1-I/II vaccines. DCs were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) that had been prepared from leukapheresis products using Ficoll-Plaque Premium (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) density gradient solution as previously described (9). The DCs were pulsed with a mixture of three WT1 peptide types that were restricted to HLA-A* 02:01, A* 02:06 (126-134: RMFPNAPYL), A*24:02 (235-243: CYTWNQMNL) and MHC-class II (332-347: KRYFKLSHLQ MHSRKH; NeoMPS Inc., City, CA, USA) (8).

Chemoimmunotherapy. The chemotherapeutic agent gemcitabine was intravenously administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. After the first gemcitabine administration cycle, the pancreatic cancer patients were treated with a combination of DC/WT1-I/II and gemcitabine. The DC/WT1-I/II vaccine (approximately 1×107 cells/dose) was intradermally administered biweekly. Nearly all vaccines overlapped with the standard chemotherapy (8).

Phenotype analysis. DCs generated from PBMCs that had been prepared from leukapheresis products were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for 30 min on ice: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-human HLA-ABC (W6/32), CD80 (2D10), CD40 (5C3), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 7 (150503; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), HLA-DR (L243), CD83 (HB 15e) and CD86 (IT2.2; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The cells were subsequently washed, fixed and analyzed using MACSQuant Analyzers (Miltenyi Biotec Inc., CA, USA) and the FlowJo analysis software (Tree Star, OR, USA).

Plasma cytokine profiles. The patient plasma samples collected were stored at −80°C. The stored plasma cytokine profiles were determined using the Human MACSPlex Cytokine 12 Kit, which enables the simultaneous measurement of human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-γ, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in a single immunoassay (Miltenyi Biotec Inc.) via MACSQuant Analyzers (Miltenyi Biotec Inc., CA, USA). The cytokine concentrations were quantified according to the manufacturer's instructions.

ELISA. To assess the production of IFN-γ and IL-10 in PBMCs upon stimulation with MHC-I/II-restricted WT1 peptides in vitro, PBMCs (1×106 cells/ml per well) from 6 DC/WT1-I/II vaccination cycles were cultured for 6 days with 10 μg/ml WT1 class I and II peptides in the presence of 10 U/ml recombinant human (rh) IL-2 (Shionogi, Osaka, Japan) and 10 ng/ml IL-7 (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). HIV env peptides were used as negative controls. The IFN-γ and IL-10 concentrations in the sample supernatants were analyzed using ELISA kits (BioLegend) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical analysis. The statistical analyses of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) prognostic factors were performed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated using the log-rank test. The immunological parameters of the pancreatic cancer patients were evaluated in a t-test analysis. Values were expressed as the means±standard deviation (SD). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients' characteristics. Patients with pathologically- or cytologically-confirmed, measurable, metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma or recurrent disease were enrolled in a non-comparative, open-label, phase I study (8). All 7 patients had stage IV disease and were treated with DC/WT1-I/II and chemotherapy. As shown in Table I, we identified 3 super-responders (OS>1 year) and 4 non-super-responders (OS≤1 year). After treatment, pancreatic cancer spread to the liver in one super-responder; however, this patient remains alive (>760 days) with a 100% Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) after receiving treatment and has received more than 51 vaccinations. The remaining 2 super-responders with stage IV pancreatic cancer died at 582 and 717 days after the first treatment.

Prognostic markers as indicated by laboratory data. There were no differences between the super-responders (OS>1 year) and non-super-responders (OS≤1 year) with regard to sex, age or tumor location (Table II). We analyzed the laboratory data prior to treatment, after the first course of gemcitabine (prior to the first vaccination) and after 6-8 rounds of DC/WT1-I/II vaccination combined with gemcitabine. There was no significant difference in the lymphocyte numbers between the super-responders and non-super-responders. Moreover, the pretreatment N/L ratio of each group was not significantly associated with OS. Interestingly, after the first course of gemcitabine (prior to the first vaccination) and after 6-8 DC/WT1-I/II vaccinations combined with gemcitabine, the N/L ratio (<4) decreased significantly in the super-responders (p=0.025 and p=0.018, respectively; Table II and Figure 1). These results suggested that an N/L ratio <4 was a prognostic marker that correlated with OS.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patients' characteristics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Prognostic factors of OS or PFS.

DC phenotype. The DCs from all 7 patients displayed a characteristic phenotype comprising of HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, CD40, CD80, CD86, CD83 and CCR7 expression (Figure 2, upper panel). There were no differences in the HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, CD80, CD86, CD83 and CCR7 mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) on DCs from super-responders (OS>1 year) versus non-super-responders (OS≤1 year) (Figure 3). Interestingly, the HLA-DR and CD83 MFIs were significantly increased in the DCs of the super-responders following chemoimmunotherapy (Figure 2 and Figure 4). In contrast, the CD83 MFIs in the DCs of non-super-responders decreased after therapy, although this difference was not significant (p=0.302).

Plasma cytokine level profiles. To assess the T-helper 1 (Th1) and T-helper 2 (Th2) cell-related cytokine profiles following chemoimmunotherapy, the levels of GM-CSF, IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A and TNF-α in plasma collected after 6-8 vaccinations were immediately and simultaneously analyzed. There were no differences between the super-responders and non-super-responders in terms of these plasma cytokine levels after vaccination (data not shown). The levels of immunosuppressive cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10 and IL-6, were higher in samples from non-super-responders (OS≤1 year) than in those from super-responders (OS>1 year), although this difference was insignificant (Figure 5A). Moreover, the levels of the Th1-stimulating cytokines IFN-α, IFN-γ and TNF-α were also higher in non-responders; again, this difference was insignificant (Figure 5A). Interestingly, the IL-6 level was significantly increased after chemoimmunotherapy in non-super-responders (p=0.049) (Figure 5B).

Cytokine production by PBMCs following WT1 peptide stimulation. To assess the cytokine profiles upon WT1 peptide stimulation in vitro in greater detail, PBMCs were cultured with MHC-I- and -II-restricted WT1 peptides after which the Th1 cytokine IFN-γ and Th2 cytokine IL-10 concentrations in the supernatants were determined. In this experimental setting, no differences in the IFN-γ and IL-10 concentrations were observed between the super-responders (OS>1 year) and non-super-responders (OS≤1 year) (Figure 6). Moreover, the PBMCs produced extremely high levels of IFN-γ relative to IL-10 (Figure 6).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Association of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with overall survival. The neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L) ratios of seven pancreatic cancer patients who received chemoimmunotherapy were analyzed prior to treatment (left panel), after the first gemcitabine course (middle panel) and after completing chemoimmunotherapy (right panel). NLR, N/L ratio.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Dendritic cell phenotypes. The indicated molecules expressed on the dendritic cells (DCs) from a super-responder (Patient no. 6) are shown prior to treatment and after chemoimmunotherapy.

Discussion

The data presented herein demonstrate that a decreased N/L ratio (<4) and increased HLA-DR and CD83 MFIs may be prognostic markers of chemoimmunotherapeutic outcome.

Results from a recent clinical trial suggest that chemotherapies, such as gemcitabine and S-1, an oral fluoropyridine, are effective chemotherapeutic agents for pancreatic cancer treatment in Japan (10). In that phase III study, the median OS was 8.8 months in the gemcitabine group, 9.7 months in the S-1 group and 10.1 months in the gemcitabine plus S-1 group. Therefore, an OS of >1 year generally indicates that the treatment was beneficial. In the present study, patients who received DC/WT1-I/II vaccinations combined with chemotherapy were classified into 2 groups: OS>1 year (super-responders) and OS≤1 year (non-super-responders). We first analyzed the pre-treatment laboratory data, including the albumin levels (data not shown), CRP levels, neutrophil numbers and lymphocyte numbers. There were no differences between the super-responders and non-super-responders in terms of these factors in our study. Our results support those from a recent report that indicated that the albumin level, CRP level, neutrophil number and lymphocyte number were not prognostic factors for the outcomes in 255 patients who had received standard chemotherapy combined with MHC-I-restricted peptide-pulsed DCs (11). Interestingly, a low post-treatment N/R ratio (<4) was associated with a good prognosis (OS>1 year) for pancreatic cancer patients in this study. Previously, an early reduction in the N/L ratio after effective treatment was reported to be associated with improved survival in cancer patients (12). Gemcitabine has been shown to up-regulate antigenic peptides on the HLA molecules of tumor cells (13), increase antigen cross-presentation (14) and decrease the immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressive cell (MDSC) (15) and regulatory T-cell (Treg) populations (16), resulting in the augmentation of antitumor immunity. The rapid decrease in the N/R ratio immediately following the initial gemcitabine course, as shown above, may have been induced by the reduced tumor-associated inflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. Moreover, the combination of DC/WT1-I/II vaccination and gemcitabine administration was also associated with additional reductions in the blood N/L ratio. A low N/L ratio was predictive of longer survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who received gemcitabine (17).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

The mean fluorescent intensities of surface molecules on dendritic cells. The pretreatment mean fluorescent intensities (MFIs) of HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, CD80, CD86, CD83 and CCR7 on dendritic cells (DCs) were compared between super-responders (OS>1year) and non-super-responders (OS≤1year). Values are expressed as means±SD.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

The pre- and post-chemoimmunotherapy mean fluorescent intensities of surface molecules on dendritic cells. The pre- and post-chemoimmunotherapy mean fluorescent intensities (MFIs) of the indicated molecules on the surfaces of dendritic cells (DCs) were compared between super-responders (OS>1year) and non-super-responders (OS≤1year). Values are expressed as means. *p<0.05.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Plasma cytokine profiles. A. The levels of cytokines (IL-6, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-γ, TNF-α and IFN-α) shown in plasma samples from patients who received 6-8 vaccinations and chemotherapy are compared between super-responders (OS>1 year) and non-super-responders (OS≤1 year). B. IL-6 levels in plasma samples (prior to treatment and after 6-8 vaccinations and chemotherapy) are compared between super-responders (OS>1year) and non-super-responders (OS≤1year). Values are expressed as means±SD. *p<0.05.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

IFN-γ and IL-10 production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. IFN-γ and IL-10 production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells after 6 vaccinations is compared between super-responders (OS>1 year) and non-super-responders (OS≤1 year).

The treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer using DC/WT1-I/II vaccination plus gemcitabine-based chemotherapy has been associated with disease stability (8). In a clinical phase I trial, WT1-specific DTH-positive patients exhibited significant improvements in OS and PFS compared to negative controls. Moreover, all patients with strong DTH reactions were super-responders. In DC-based vaccines, autologous DCs are generated from GM-CSF- and IL-4-treated monocytes and subsequently mature through incubation with penicillin-killed and lyophilized preparations of a low-virulence Streptococcus pyogenes (OK-432) strain (Su) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). The expression levels of HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, CD80, CD86, CD83 and CCR7 on the DCs derived prior to treatment did not differ between patients, thus indicating a uniform DC quality. Interestingly, in the super-responders, the HLA-DR and CD83 expression levels increased significantly after treatment relative to pre-treatment levels. Vaccination with fusion products generated from DCs and whole tumor cells has been reported to result in DC maturation (18, 19). Our results were also consistent with reports in which the phenotypic features of DCs were found to differentiate in vitro following vaccination. These results suggested that the increased surface expression of DC markers after treatment indicates improved antigen-presenting function in these cells (18). Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer exhibited impaired DC function; however, gemcitabine improved DC function (20). The significantly increased levels of HLA-DR and CD83 expression on the DCs derived from patients who received DC/WT1-I/II and gemcitabine suggest that chemoimmunotherapy may restore DC function. In the super-responders, the improved DC phenotype (HLA-DR and CD83) may be associated with longer survival.

The plasma cytokine profile may be important when assessing the prognostic markers associated with chemoimmunotherapy. In this study, the pancreatic cancer patients received DC/WT1-I/II vaccines combined with chemotherapy. Therefore, we analyzed the Th1 and Th2 cytokine profiles after vaccinations. Our results revealed no differences between the cytokine profiles of super-responders and non-super-responders. The levels of the immunosuppressive cytokines IL-4, IL-10 and IL-6 were higher in non-super-responders than in super-responders, although this difference was not significant. Unexpectedly, the levels of the Th1 cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α and IFN-α were also higher in non-super-responders; however, this difference was not significant. We also analyzed in greater detail the Th1 and Th2 responses of PBMCs upon WT1 peptide stimulation in vitro. Similarly, there were also no differences between the super-responders and non-super-responders in terms of IFN-γ or IL-10 production by PBMCs after 6-8 vaccinations. Interestingly, IL-6 plasma levels in non-super-responders were significantly increased after chemoimmunotherapy relative to the pretreatment levels. IL-6 is one of the major immunosuppressive cytokines, which can induce tumor progression by manipulating immune responses. Therefore, an increased IL-6 level in plasma may be associated with poor prognosis. The immune checkpoint blockade targeted-agents, such as programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been used to successfully treat patients with advanced melanoma (21). Therefore, it may be more important to inhibit immunosuppressive responses than to stimulate immunity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The primary limitation of our study is the relatively small size of the evaluated sample. Further studies are required to evaluate the prognostic markers of chemoimmunotherapy with DC/WT1-I/II.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Ministry of Education, Cultures, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and the Mitsui Life Social Welfare Foundation.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • Received September 14, 2014.
  • Revision received October 14, 2014.
  • Accepted October 21, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Steinman RM
    : The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol 9: 271-296, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Koido S,
    2. Homma S,
    3. Takahara A,
    4. Namiki Y,
    5. Tsukinaga S,
    6. Mitobe J,
    7. Odahara S,
    8. Yukawa T,
    9. Matsudaira H,
    10. Nagatsuma K,
    11. Uchiyama K,
    12. Satoh K,
    13. Ito M,
    14. Komita H,
    15. Arakawa H,
    16. Ohkusa T,
    17. Gong J,
    18. Tajiri H
    : Current immunotherapeutic approaches in pancreatic cancer. Clin Dev Immunol, 2011: 267539, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Tanaka Y,
    2. Koido S,
    3. Ohana M,
    4. Liu C,
    5. Gong J
    : Induction of impaired antitumor immunity by fusion of MHC class II-deficient dendritic cells with tumor cells. J Immunol 174: 1270-1280, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Koido S,
    2. Enomoto Y,
    3. Apostolopoulos V,
    4. Gong J
    : Tumor regression by CD4 T-cells primed with dendritic/tumor fusion cell vaccines. Anticancer Res 34: 3917-3924, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Oji Y,
    2. Nakamori S,
    3. Fujikawa M,
    4. Nakatsuka S,
    5. Yokota A,
    6. Tatsumi N,
    7. Abeno S,
    8. Ikeba A,
    9. Takashima S,
    10. Tsujie M,
    11. Yamamoto H,
    12. Sakon M,
    13. Nezu R,
    14. Kawano K,
    15. Nishida S,
    16. Ikegame K,
    17. Kawakami M,
    18. Tsuboi A,
    19. Oka Y,
    20. Yoshikawa K,
    21. Aozasa K,
    22. Monden M,
    23. Sugiyama H
    : Overexpression of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci 95: 583-587, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Sugiyama H
    : WT1 (Wilms' Tumor Gene 1): biology and cancer immunotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40: 377-387, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Cheever MA,
    2. Allison JP,
    3. Ferris AS,
    4. Finn OJ,
    5. Hastings BM,
    6. Hecht TT,
    7. Mellman I,
    8. Prindiville SA,
    9. Viner JL,
    10. Weiner LM,
    11. Matrisian LM
    : The prioritization of cancer antigens: a national cancer institute pilot project for the acceleration of translational research. Clin Cancer Res 15: 5323-5337, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Koido S,
    2. Homma S,
    3. Okamoto M,
    4. Takakura K,
    5. Mori M,
    6. Yoshizaki S,
    7. Tsukinaga S,
    8. Odahara S,
    9. Koyama S,
    10. Imazu H,
    11. Uchiyama K,
    12. Kajihara M,
    13. Arakawa H,
    14. Misawa T,
    15. Toyama Y,
    16. Yanagisawa S,
    17. Ikegami M,
    18. Kan S,
    19. Hayashi K,
    20. Komita H,
    21. Kamata Y,
    22. Ito M,
    23. Ishidao T,
    24. Yusa S,
    25. Shimodaira S,
    26. Gong J,
    27. Sugiyama H,
    28. Ohkusa T,
    29. Tajiri H
    : Treatment with chemotherapy and dendritic cells pulsed with multiple Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1)-specific MHC class I/II-restricted epitopes for pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 20: 4228-4239, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kimura Y,
    2. Tsukada J,
    3. Tomoda T,
    4. Takahashi H,
    5. Imai K,
    6. Shimamura K,
    7. Sunamura M,
    8. Yonemitsu Y,
    9. Shimodaira S,
    10. Koido S,
    11. Homma S,
    12. Okamoto M
    : Clinical and immunologic evaluation of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in combination with gemcitabine and/or S-1 in the patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Pancreas 41: 195-205, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Ueno H,
    2. Ioka T,
    3. Ikeda M,
    4. Ohkawa S,
    5. Yanagimoto H,
    6. Boku N,
    7. Fukutomi A,
    8. Sugimori K,
    9. Baba H,
    10. Yamao K,
    11. Shimamura T,
    12. Sho M,
    13. Kitano M,
    14. Cheng AL,
    15. Mizumoto K,
    16. Chen JS,
    17. Furuse J,
    18. Funakoshi A,
    19. Hatori T,
    20. Yamaguchi T,
    21. Egawa S,
    22. Sato A,
    23. Ohashi Y,
    24. Okusaka T,
    25. Tanaka M
    : Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol 31: 1640-1648, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kobayashi M,
    2. Shimodaira S,
    3. Nagai K,
    4. Ogasawara M,
    5. Takahashi H,
    6. Abe H,
    7. Tanii M,
    8. Okamoto M,
    9. Tsujitani S,
    10. Yusa S,
    11. Ishidao T,
    12. Kishimoto J,
    13. Shibamoto Y,
    14. Nagaya M,
    15. Yonemitsu Y
    : Prognostic factors related to add-on dendritic cell vaccines on patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy: a multicenter analysis. Cancer Immunol Immunother 63: 797-806, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Lee Y,
    2. Kim SH,
    3. Han JY,
    4. Kim HT,
    5. Yun T,
    6. Lee JS
    : Early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio reduction as a surrogate marker of prognosis in never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving gefitinib or standard chemotherapy as first-line therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138: 2009-2016, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Takahara A,
    2. Koido S,
    3. Ito M,
    4. Nagasaki E,
    5. Sagawa Y,
    6. Iwamoto T,
    7. Komita H,
    8. Ochi T,
    9. Fujiwara H,
    10. Yasukawa M,
    11. Mineno J,
    12. Shiku H,
    13. Nishida S,
    14. Sugiyama H,
    15. Tajiri H,
    16. Homma S
    : Gemcitabine enhances Wilms' tumor gene WT1 expression and sensitizes human pancreatic cancer cells with WT1-specific T-cell-mediated antitumor immune response. Cancer Immunol Immunother 60: 1289-1297, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Nowak AK,
    2. Lake RA,
    3. Marzo AL,
    4. Scott B,
    5. Heath WR,
    6. Collins EJ,
    7. Frelinger JA,
    8. Robinson BW
    : Induction of tumor cell apoptosis in vivo increases tumor antigen cross-presentation, cross-priming rather than cross-tolerizing host tumor-specific CD8 T cells. J Immunol 170: 4905-4913, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Suzuki E,
    2. Kapoor V,
    3. Jassar AS,
    4. Kaiser LR,
    5. Albelda SM
    : Gemcitabine selectively eliminates splenic Gr-1+/CD11b+ myeloid suppressor cells in tumor-bearing animals and enhances antitumor immune activity. Clin Cancer Res 11: 6713-6721, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Rettig L,
    2. Seidenberg S,
    3. Parvanova I,
    4. Samaras P,
    5. Curioni A,
    6. Knuth A,
    7. Pascolo S
    : Gemcitabine depletes regulatory T-cells in human and mice and enhances triggering of vaccine-specific cytotoxic T-cells. Int J Cancer 129: 832-838, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. An X,
    2. Ding PR,
    3. Li YH,
    4. Wang FH,
    5. Shi YX,
    6. Wang ZQ,
    7. He YJ,
    8. Xu RH,
    9. Jiang WQ
    : Elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Biomarkers 15: 516-522, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Neves AR,
    2. Ensina LF,
    3. Anselmo LB,
    4. Leite KR,
    5. Buzaid AC,
    6. Camara-Lopes LH,
    7. Barbuto JA
    : Dendritic cells derived from metastatic cancer patients vaccinated with allogeneic dendritic cell-autologous tumor cell hybrids express more CD86 and induce higher levels of interferon-gamma in mixed lymphocyte reactions. Cancer Immunol Immunother 54: 61-66, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Koido S,
    2. Homma S,
    3. Hara E,
    4. Mitsunaga M,
    5. Namiki Y,
    6. Takahara A,
    7. Nagasaki E,
    8. Komita H,
    9. Sagawa Y,
    10. Ohkusa T,
    11. Fujise K,
    12. Gong J,
    13. Tajiri H
    : In vitro generation of cytotoxic and regulatory T cells by fusions of human dendritic cells and hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Transl Med 6: 51, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Yanagimoto H,
    2. Takai S,
    3. Satoi S,
    4. Toyokawa H,
    5. Takahashi K,
    6. Terakawa N,
    7. Kwon AH,
    8. Kamiyama Y
    : Impaired function of circulating dendritic cells in patients with pancreatic cancer. Clin Immunol 114: 52-60, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Zitvogel L,
    2. Kroemer G
    : Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 interactions for cancer immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 1: 1223-1225, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 1
January 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Markers for Patient Outcome Following Vaccination with Multiple MHC Class I/II-restricted WT1 Peptide-pulsed Dendritic Cells Plus Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Markers for Patient Outcome Following Vaccination with Multiple MHC Class I/II-restricted WT1 Peptide-pulsed Dendritic Cells Plus Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
KAZUKI TAKAKURA, SHIGEO KOIDO, SHIN KAN, KOSAKU YOSHIDA, MASAKO MORI, YUTA HIRANO, ZENSHO ITO, HIROKO KOBAYASHI, SHINICHIRO TAKAMI, YOSHIHIRO MATSUMOTO, MIKIO KAJIHARA, TAKEYUKI MISAWA, MASATO OKAMOTO, HARUO SUGIYAMA, SADAMU HOMMA, TOSHIFUMI OHKUSA, HISAO TAJIRI
Anticancer Research Jan 2015, 35 (1) 555-562;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prognostic Markers for Patient Outcome Following Vaccination with Multiple MHC Class I/II-restricted WT1 Peptide-pulsed Dendritic Cells Plus Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
KAZUKI TAKAKURA, SHIGEO KOIDO, SHIN KAN, KOSAKU YOSHIDA, MASAKO MORI, YUTA HIRANO, ZENSHO ITO, HIROKO KOBAYASHI, SHINICHIRO TAKAMI, YOSHIHIRO MATSUMOTO, MIKIO KAJIHARA, TAKEYUKI MISAWA, MASATO OKAMOTO, HARUO SUGIYAMA, SADAMU HOMMA, TOSHIFUMI OHKUSA, HISAO TAJIRI
Anticancer Research Jan 2015, 35 (1) 555-562;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • WT1-pulsed Dendritic Cell Vaccine Combined with Chemotherapy for Resected Pancreatic Cancer in a Phase I Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Real-world Delivery and Outcomes of Intravesical BCG for Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Early Progressive Disease Predicts Poor Outcomes of Second-line VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy After First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Evaluation of Quality Metrics for Dose Assessment in Field Overlap Regions of VMAT-Based Craniospinal Axis Irradiation
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • cytokine
  • Chemoimmunotherapy
  • Dendritic cell
  • MHC class II
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • vaccine
  • WT1
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire