Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Assessment of Surgical Treatment and Postoperative Nutrition in Gastric Cancer Patients Older than 80 Years

TOMONORI NAKANOKO, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI, KOJI ANDO, YUICHIRO NAKASHIMA, KIPPEI OHGAKI, YASUE KIMURA, HIROSHI SAEKI, EIJI OKI, MASARU MORITA and YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research January 2015, 35 (1) 511-515;
TOMONORI NAKANOKO
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOJI ANDO
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUICHIRO NAKASHIMA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KIPPEI OHGAKI
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUE KIMURA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI SAEKI
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EIJI OKI
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASARU MORITA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maehara{at}surg2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: A gastrectomy for gastric cancer is sometimes required in patients older than 80 years due to the continuously increasing age of society. However, if a gastrectomy worsens the postoperative quality of life and daily activity in elderly patients because of poor nutrition, the procedure may not always be a useful treatment strategy. Patients and Methods: Clinicopathological data of patients with gastric cancer who underwent a gastrectomy at our Department between 1998 and 2008 (N=471) were collected and analyzed. The results of treatment for patients older than 80 years (N=41) were analyzed and compared against those of patients younger than 80 years (N=430). Results: Patients older than 80 years had a higher frequency of preoperative co-morbidities than patients younger than 80 years. However, there was no statistical difference in postoperative complications regarding nutrition between the two groups. Conclusion: Older age is not a determinant of poor nutrition following gastrectomy. Gastrectomy for gastric cancer is, therefore, a useful treatment strategy, regardless of ageing.

  • Gastrectomy
  • elderly patients
  • nutrition

The population is ageing throughout the world (1, 2). As a consequence, the age of patients with gastric cancer is also increasing, with more than 40% of patients in Japan being over 70 years of age (3). We have previously reported the clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in 344 patients older than 70 years who underwent gastrectomy between 1965 and 1990. This finding demonstrated that the frequency of surgical treatment increased with survival of elderly patients with gastric cancer (4). However, mean life expectancy in Japan has increased to 79.3 years for males and 86.1 years for females (5). The age of gastric cancer patients has also been increasing gradually at our Department. Treatment strategies are, therefore, now required for gastric cancer patients over 80 years of age. The aim of the present study was to elucidate whether treatment strategies for patients with gastric cancer older than 80 years are comparable with patients younger than 80 years with regard to complications, postoperative nutrition, survival rate, and clinical outcome.

Patients and Methods

A total of 471 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent gastrectomy at the Department of Surgery and Science, Kyushu University Hospital between 1998 and 2008. Forty-one patients (8.7%) were older than 80 years. The clinicopathological features of the patients were reviewed using hospital records, followed by a comparison of data of patients either younger or older than 80 yr. Informed consent was obtained from each patient.

The surgical specimens were examined pathologically and scored according to the TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (6). The preoperative physical status prior to gastrectomy was scored according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) (7).

All patients were followed-up for intervals ranging from 3 to 12 months. These follow-up visits included physical examination, blood analysis, and a combination of imageing examinations such as computed tomography. The median follow-up period in the study was 30 (range=1.5-130) months.

All values such as operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, blood test results, and degree of weight loss were expressed as the mean±standard deviation (SD). The comparisons between the two study groups were carried out using Fisher's exact test. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

Patients' characteristics. The characteristics of patients are shown in Table I. The median age of patients older or younger than 80 years was 82.1 and 61.9 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in sex distribution between the two groups. The majority of patients were categorized as ASA-PS 0-2. Histologically, the depth of tumor invasion, lymphatic involvement, and pathological stage were not different in the two groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patients' characteristics.

Preoperative co-morbidities. Preoperative co-morbidities were more likely to be observed (61.0%) in patients older than 80 years compared to those under 80 years of age (Table II). In particular, anemia, cardiovascular dysfunction, and renal dysfunction were more frequently observed in patients older than 80 years, whereas there was no significant difference in other morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, liver, and respiratory dysfunction.

Surgical procedures and postoperative complications. There was no statistical difference in surgical procedures between the two groups (Table III). Operation time, volume of blood loss, and period of postoperative hospital stay also showed no statistical differences. No operation-related death occurred in either group. Postoperative complications were observed in 4 cases (9.8%) in patients older than 80 years. This frequency was not significantly different than that observed in patients younger than 80 years (12.8%). Cardiovascular dysfunction and delirium was also observed in patients older than 80 years Other postoperative complications included acute colitis and mild paralytic obstruction.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Preoperative co-morbidities.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Surgical procedures and postoperative complications.

Postoperative nutritional assessment. A total of 336 patients who were followed-up as outpatients over a one-year period had a postoperative nutritional assessment. The degree of weight loss after gastrectomy was selected as an indicator of postoperative nutrition. One year after gastrectomy, mean weight loss was not statistically different in the two groups (≥80 years, 6.8 kg; <80 years, 6.0 kg) (Table IV). Variations in the levels of serum total protein and albumin, and hemoglobin level were also assessed as postoperative nutritional indicators one year after gastrectomy. These levels showed no significant difference between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in these serum chemistry values at 3 or 5 years after gastrectomy (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Postoperative nutritional assessment one year after gastrectomy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced cases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Reasons why adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed in patients older than 80 years.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Only four patients older than 80 years had postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and received either UFT (oral tegafur and uracil) or S-1 (oral fluoropyrimidine). Two of these cases did not complete the course of chemotherapy because of tumor progression or severe appetite loss. Nine of the patients older than 80 years were adaptation cases for adjuvant chemotherapy, although this was not carried-out because of severe co-morbidities or the patient or their family declined the treatment (Tables V and VI).

Survival. Twelve of 41 (29.3%) patients older than 80 years died during the follow-up period. The median follow-up period was 28.3 months. Five of the deaths (12.2%) were associated with progression or recurrence of the gastric cancer. In contrast, 67 (15.6%) of the 430 patients younger than 80 years died of gastric cancer. The overall survival rates were 48.8% and 72.9% in patients older or younger than 80 years, respectively (p=0.0324) (Figure 1). In contrast, the cumulative 5-year survival rate of patients in the over 80 and under 80 years age groups was 81.8% and 78.2%, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.963) (Figure 2).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overall survival in patients younger than 80 years (gray line) or older than 80 years (black line).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Cumulative survival in patients younger than 80 years (gray line) or older than 80 years (black line).

Discussion

The incidence of gastric cancer in Japan is considerably higher than in other countries. An ageing society has an increased number of elderly people with various diseases such as gastric cancer (8). Although gastrectomies in elderly patients are since long been performed, recent improvements in surgical procedures and perioperative management have changed the environment for elderly patients with gastric cancer (9, 10).

Our study showed no difference between the over-80 and under-80 age groups in ASA-PS classification. This finding suggests that patients older than 80 years who had a gastrectomy may be selected because of their natural better performance status (11). However, gastrectomy is not indicated for patients older than 80 years if they have poor performance status. The number of patients older than 80 years categorized as stage IV was less than in the under-80 years age group, whereas there was no difference in the other stages. Gastrectomy for stage IV patients is performed as palliative surgery, but is not indicated for these patients. Gastrectomy is also not indicated in patients older than 80 years classified as IV because of their performance status (12, 13). Performing gastrectomy for ageing patients, with an advanced stage may worsen postoperative quality of life, especially in patients older than 80 years (14).

Weight and appetite loss is not rare in patients after a gastrectomy (15, 16) but may not necessarily reflect differences in age. Despite ageing, there was no difference in the degree of weight loss compared to younger patients. If weight loss and poor nutrition is observed considerably more frequently in patients older than 80 years, a gastrectomy should not be recommended. Because weight loss and poor nutrition induce poor quality of life (17), these factors may also result in a poor prognosis after gastrectomy, especially in patients older than 80 years. The cumulative survival rates demonstrate that there was no difference between the over 80 years and under 80 years age groups in death caused by gastric cancer. This finding indicates that gastrectomy improves prognosis for ageing gastric cancer patients, and that gastrectomy may not necessarily lead to a deterioration in quality of life.

In general, adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients reduces the recurrence rate after a gastrectomy (18-21). However for ageing patients, chemotherapy is not usually safe, because of side-effects or co-morbidities (22-24). In particular, it is not uncommon for patients older than 80 years to die from any other causes. While postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for advanced cases because it reduces the risk of recurrence, not all patients agree to undergo this therapy. Patients and their family tend to worry about side-effects and worsening of co-morbidities, especially in ageing patients. The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy to improve prognosis in patients older than 80 years needs to be examined in a larger number of cases.

Conclusion

The present study showed that gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients older than 80 years is a safe treatment strategy. There was no significant difference observed in the degree of weight loss and worsening of nutrition caused by gastrectomy in patients younger or older than 80 years.

  • Received August 25, 2014.
  • Revision received October 6, 2014.
  • Accepted October 10, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel R,
    2. Naishadham D,
    3. Jemal A
    : Cancer statics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 10-29, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Eray F,
    2. Ren JS,
    3. Masuyer E,
    4. Ferlay J
    : Int J Cancer 132: 1133-1145, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Current status of gastric cancer screening in Japan 2004, Tokyo. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2010.
  4. ↵
    1. Maehara Y,
    2. Oshiro T,
    3. Oiwa H,
    4. Oda S,
    5. Baba H,
    6. Akazawa K,
    7. Sugimachi K
    : Gastric carcinoma in patients over 70 years of age. Br J Surg 82: 102-105, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Abridged life table for Japan 2008, Tokyo. Statistics and Information Department, Minister's Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2010.
  6. ↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Gospodarowicz MK,
    3. Wittekind C
    : TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2010.
  7. ↵
    1. Wolters U,
    2. Wolf T,
    3. Stültzer H,
    4. Schröder T
    : ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 77: 217-222, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Age-specific cancer incidence rate, 2004. Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Japan 2010.
  9. ↵
    1. Shojania KG,
    2. Duncan BW,
    3. McDonald KM,
    4. Wachter RM,
    5. Markowitz AJ
    : Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess i-x, 1-668, 2001.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Jeong O,
    2. Park YK,
    3. Ryu SY,
    4. Kim YJ
    : Effect of Age on Surgical Outcomes of Extended Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection in Gastric Carcinoma: Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 17: 1589-1596, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Turrentine FE,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Simpson VB,
    4. Jones RS
    : Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203: 865-877, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kahlke V,
    2. Bestmann B,
    3. Schmid A,
    4. Doniec JM,
    5. Küchler T,
    6. Kremer B
    : Palliation of metastatic gastric cancer: impact of preoperative symptoms and the type of operation on surgical and quality of life. World J Surg 28: 369-375, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Huang KH,
    2. Wu CW,
    3. Fang WL,
    4. Chen JH,
    5. Lo SS,
    6. Wang RF,
    7. Li AF
    : Palliative resection in noncurative gastric cancer patients. World J Surg 34: 1015-1021, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Martella B,
    2. Millitello C,
    3. Spirch S,
    4. Bruttocao A,
    5. Nistri R,
    6. De Rossi A,
    7. Barbon B,
    8. Terranova O
    : Palliative surgery for gastric cancer in elderly patients. Acta Biomed 76(Suppl 1): 49-51, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Marano L,
    2. Porfidia R,
    3. Pezzella M,
    4. Grassis M,
    5. Petrillo M,
    6. Esposito G,
    7. Braccio B,
    8. Gallo P,
    9. Boccardi V,
    10. Cosenza A,
    11. Izzo G,
    12. Di Martino N
    : Clinical and immunological impact of early postoperative enteral immunonutrition after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg Oncol 20: 3912-3918, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Malmström M,
    2. Ivarsson B,
    3. Johansson J,
    4. Klefsgärd R
    : Long-term experiences after oesophagectomy/gastrectomy for cancer – a focus group study. Int J Nurs Stud 50: 44-52, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Amarantos E,
    2. Martinez A,
    3. Dwyer J
    : Nutrition and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56: 54-64, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Jackson C,
    2. Cunningham D,
    3. Oliveira,
    4. ESMO Guidelines Working Group
    : Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 20: 34-36, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Liu TS,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Chen SY,
    4. Sun YH
    : An updated meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 34: 1208-1216, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. GASTRIC GROUP,
    2. Paoletti X,
    3. Oba K,
    4. Burzykowski T,
    5. Michiels S,
    6. Ohashi Y,
    7. Pignon JP,
    8. Rougier P,
    9. Sakamoto J,
    10. Sargent D,
    11. Sasako M,
    12. Van Cutsem E,
    13. Buyse M
    : Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA 303: 1729-1737, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Sakuramoto S,
    2. Sasako M,
    3. Yamaguchi T,
    4. Kinoshita T,
    5. Fujii M,
    6. Nashimoto A,
    7. Nakajima T,
    8. Ohashi Y,
    9. Imamura H,
    10. Higashino M,
    11. Yamamura Y,
    12. Kurita A,
    13. ACTS-GC Group
    : Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357: 1810-1820, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Repetto L
    : Greater risks of chemotherapy toxicity in elderly patients with cancer. J Support Oncol 1: 18-24, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Laurent M,
    2. Pailland E,
    3. Tournigand C,
    4. Caillet P,
    5. Le Thuaut A,
    6. Lagrange JL,
    7. Beauchet O,
    8. Vincent H,
    9. Carvahlo-Verlinde M,
    10. Culine S,
    11. Bastuji-Garin S,
    12. Canouï-Poitrine F,
    13. ELCAPA Study Group
    : Assessment of social cancer treatment feasibility in older patients: a prospective cohort study. Oncologist 19: 275-282, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Gillison TL,
    2. Chatta GS
    : Cancer chemotherapy in the elderly patient. Oncology 24: 76-85, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 1
January 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Surgical Treatment and Postoperative Nutrition in Gastric Cancer Patients Older than 80 Years
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessment of Surgical Treatment and Postoperative Nutrition in Gastric Cancer Patients Older than 80 Years
TOMONORI NAKANOKO, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI, KOJI ANDO, YUICHIRO NAKASHIMA, KIPPEI OHGAKI, YASUE KIMURA, HIROSHI SAEKI, EIJI OKI, MASARU MORITA, YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research Jan 2015, 35 (1) 511-515;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Assessment of Surgical Treatment and Postoperative Nutrition in Gastric Cancer Patients Older than 80 Years
TOMONORI NAKANOKO, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI, KOJI ANDO, YUICHIRO NAKASHIMA, KIPPEI OHGAKI, YASUE KIMURA, HIROSHI SAEKI, EIJI OKI, MASARU MORITA, YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research Jan 2015, 35 (1) 511-515;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • The Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Gastrectomy in Elderly Patients With Gastric Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Risk Factors for Hyperglycemia Associated With Anamorelin Administration
  • Identification of Risk Factors for the Local Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-radiofrequency Ablation
  • Practical Implementation and Validation of Geriatric Assessment in Older Adults With Esophageal Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • gastrectomy
  • elderly patients
  • nutrition
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire