Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Immunohistochemical, Cytogenetic, and Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of Both Components of a Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: Implications for Histogenesis

JUN NISHIO, HIROSHI IWASAKI, KAZUKI NABESHIMA and MASATOSHI NAITO
Anticancer Research January 2015, 35 (1) 345-350;
JUN NISHIO
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jnishio{at}cis.fukuoka-u.ac.jp
HIROSHI IWASAKI
2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUKI NABESHIMA
2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASATOSHI NAITO
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) is a malignant adipocytic tumor showing transition from an atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) to a non-lipogenic sarcoma of variable histological grades. We present the immunohistochemical, cytogenetic, and molecular cytogenetic findings of DDLS arising in the right chest wall of a 76-year-old man. Magnetic resonance imaging exhibited a large mass composed of two components with heterogeneous signal intensities, suggesting the coexistence of a fatty area and another soft tissue component. The grossly heterogeneous mass was histologically composed of an ALT/WDLS component transitioning abruptly into a dedifferentiated component. Immunohistochemistry was positive for murine double-minute 2 (MDM2), cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), and p16 in both components, although a more strong and diffuse staining was found in the dedifferentiated area. The MIB-1 labeling index was extremely higher in the dedifferentiated area compared to the ALT/WDLS area. Cytogenetic analysis of the ALT/WDLS component revealed the following karyotype: 46,X,-Y,+r. Notably, cytogenetic analysis of the dedifferentiated component revealed a similar but more complex karyotype. Spectral karyotyping demonstrated that the ring chromosome was entirely composed of material from chromosome 12. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 in both components. These findings suggest that multiple abnormal clones derived from a single precursor cell would be present in DDLS, with one or more containing supernumerary rings or giant marker chromosomes.

  • Dedifferentiated liposarcoma
  • well-differentiated liposarcoma
  • ring chromosome
  • MDM2
  • CDK4

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) is a distinct subtype of liposarcoma showing transition from an atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) to a non-lipogenic sarcoma. Dedifferentiation occurs in up to 10% of ALT/WDLS (1). However, the underlying mechanism of this process is still unknown.

Similar to ALT/WDLS, DDLS usually has rings or giant marker chromosomes (2). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization studies have revealed that these abnormal chromosomes in ALT/WDLS and DDLS are composed, exclusively or partly, of amplified 12q13-15 material, including the murine double-minute 2 (MDM2) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) genes (3-5). Amplification of other chromosomal regions, such as 1p32 and 6q23, has also been identified in DDLS (6, 7).

Herein, we describe the imaging, histological, immunohistochemical, cytogenetic, and molecular cytogenetic findings of DDLS arising in the chest wall of an elderly man. In the current study, cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic analyses were carried-out on both components of DDLS.

Case Report

A 76-year-old man was referred to our Hospital with a 6-month history of a painless mass exhibiting recent increase in size in the right chest wall. Physical examination revealed a 14-cm, elastic-soft, mobile, non-tender mass. Neurovascular examinations were unremarkable. Magnetic resonance imaging clearly revealed that the mass was composed of two components. One had a signal intensity similar to that of subcutaneous fat on both T1- and T2-weighted sequences. The other had iso signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and slightly high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences compared to skeletal muscle (Figure 1A and B). Contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences showed significant enhancement of the dedifferentiated component (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Axial magnetic resonance images of dedifferentiated liposarcoma involving the right chest wall. The mass was composed of two components. T1-Weighted sequence (A) showed that an atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) component had high signal intensity and a dedifferentiated component had low signal intensity. T2-Weighted sequence (B) revealed that the ALT/WDLS component had high signal intensity and the dedifferentiated component had slightly high signal intensity relative to skeletal muscle. Contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequence (C) demonstrated significant enhancement of the dedifferentiated component.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Histological findings of dedifferentiated liposarcoma. A: Abrupt transition between atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) and non-lipogenic area can be seen (hematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification ×40). B: The ALT/WDLS component was composed of relatively mature adipocytic cells and some hyperchromatic stromal cells (hematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification ×80). C: The dedifferentiated component was composed of atypical stromal cells including mononuclear cells in a collagenous matrix (hematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification ×120).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Immunohistochemical findings of dedifferentiated liposarcoma. The dedifferentiated area (B) shows diffuse nuclear positivity for murine double-minute 2, in contrast to the atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) area (A). Nuclear expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 is diffusely visible in the dedifferentiated area (D), whereas focal expression can be seen in the ALT/WDLS area (C). The MIB-1 labeling index is much higher in the dedifferentiated area (F) compared to the ALT/WDLS area (E). (A-F, original magnification ×80).

A sub-extensive resection was performed. Macroscopically, the resected tumor, measuring 14×10×3 cm, was composed of two portions with distinct colors, yellow and tan-gray. Microscopically, the tumor exhibited biphasic morphology consistent with the macroscopic appearance (Figure 2A). The yellow component was composed of relatively mature adipocytic cells with some atypical spindle cells and bizarre giant cells with large hyperchromatic nuclei (Figure 2B). Hyperchromatic stromal cells were also found within the fibrous septa. On the other hand, the tan-gray component was composed of atypical stromal cells including mononuclear and multi-nuclear giant cells (Figure 2C). Abundant collagen was found in the stroma of the dedifferentiated area. By immuno-histochemistry, the ALT/WDLS area displayed focal immunoreactivity for MDM2, CDK4, and p16, whereas the DDLS area exhibited stronger and more diffuse staining (Figure 3A-D). The MIB-1 labeling index was approximately 1-3% in the ALT/WDLS area (Figure 3E), whereas it was 31% in the dedifferentiated area (Figure 3F). Based on these features, the tumor was diagnosed as a DDLS.

Cytogenetic analysis of the ALT/WDLS component revealed the following karyotype: 46,X,-Y,+r (Figure 4). Notably, cytogenetic analysis of the dedifferentiated component revealed a similar but more complex karyotype: 44-46,X,-Y,del(5)(q?),add(9)(p11),add(11)(p11.2),der(11;17) (q10;q10),tas(19;20)(p13;p13),-21,der(21;22) (q10;q10), +r,+mar[cp9] (Figure 5). Spectral karyotyping (SKY) demonstrated that the ring chromosome was entirely composed of material from chromosome 12 (Figure 6). Interphase FISH analysis showed amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 in both components (Figure 7).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

A representative GTG-banded karyotype of the atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma component displaying a supernumerary ring chromosome (r1).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

A representative GTG-banded karyotype of the dedifferentiated component, including ring (r1) and giant marker (mar) chromosomes. Arrows indicate the structural chromosome aberration.

Post-operative hematoma occurred and gradually resolved with conservative treatment. At four months' follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and there was no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Spectral karyotyping of the atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma component illustrating the origin of the ring chromosome. Classified image is displayed alongside the reverse 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole image.

Discussion

Comparative conventional cytogenetic studies of both components of DDLS are very few. Most karyotypes are probably derived from the dedifferentiated component (5). In the present study, we compared the cytogenetic and molecular genetic features of both components of DDLS using conventional karyotyping, SKY, and FISH. The current case clearly shows that the tumor cells in both components appear to originate from a single precursor, but there were a substantial number of cytogenetic alterations in the dedifferentiated component.

12q13-15 amplification is thought to play an important role in the initiation of ALT/WLDS (8). Using SKY, we identified that the ring chromosome was exclusively composed of material from chromosome 12, which contains the MDM2 and CDK4 genes. Moreover, in agreement with the report of Horvai et al., we observed MDM2 and CDK4 protein overexpression and gene amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 in both components (6). MDM2 is an oncogene that promotes degradation of p53 tumor-suppressor protein. CDK4 is also an oncogene whose product inhibits retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) tumor-suppressor protein. To date, there exist few studies investigating the prognostic significance of these molecular abnormalities in DDLS (9-11). These studies indicated that MDM2 amplification level is not a significant prognostic factor, whereas CDK4 amplification level appears to be a promising prognostic biomarker. Recently, Dickson et al. reported that treatment with a selective CDK4 inhibitor was associated with a favorable progression-free rate in patients with advanced CDK4-amplified DDLS (12).

The mechanism of dedifferentiation is controversial in DDLS. Segura-Sánchez et al. reported that chromosome 12 copy number alterations and co-expression of MDM2, CDK4, and p53 were related to dedifferentiation (13). Takahira et al. suggested that loss of heterozygosity of the RB1 gene located at 13q14 might play a role in dedifferentiation (14). He et al. also suggested that aberrant promoter methylation of the p16 gene located at 9p21 might contribute to dedifferentiation (15). Crago et al. demonstrated that 11q23-24 loss was associated with genomic complexity and distinct morphology (8). Several potential tumor-suppressor genes such as etoposide-induced 2.4 (EI24) are located at this chromosome band. Hisaoka et al. reported that aberrant expression of an anti-adipogenic factor, calreticulin, was involved in dedifferentiation (16). Recently, several reports suggested an association between dedifferentiation and jun proto-oncogene (JUN) amplification and overexpression (17-19). The JUN gene is located at 1p32 and its overexpression can interfere with adipocytic differentiation. In the current case, we identified the presence of supernumerary ring chromosome containing amplified material from chromosome 12 in both components. This provides strong evidence for a monoclonal origin. However, we also found many different cytogenetic alterations, which occurred after the diversion of the two components. The dedifferentiated component showed structural and/or numerical aberrations in chromosomes 5, 9, 11, 17, 19, 20, 21, and 22. Taken together, these observations suggest that increasingly complex chromosomal abnormalities may develop during tumor progression of DDLS. Among various abnormalities, cell-cycle regulatory molecules p53, p16, and RB1 may also be important in the development of DDLS.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) (red signal) and chromosome 12 satellite enumeration (green signal) probes on paraffin-embedded sections from the atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma component (A) and the dedifferentiated component (B). CDK4 amplification is observed in both components.

In summary, we described the immunohistochemical, cytogenetic, and molecular cytogenetic findings of DDLS arising in the chest wall of an elderly man. The current case indicates that multiple abnormal clones derived from a single precursor cell would be present in DDLS, with one or more containing supernumerary rings or giant marker chromosomes.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by the Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25462355.

  • Received August 21, 2014.
  • Revision received September 23, 2014.
  • Accepted September 26, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fletcher CDM,
    2. Bridge JA,
    3. Hogendoorn PCW,
    4. Mertens F
    1. Dei Tos AP,
    2. Marino-Enriquez A,
    3. Pedeutour F,
    4. Rossi S
    : Dedifferentiated liposarcoma. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F (eds.). Lyon, IARC Press, pp. 37-38, 2013.
  2. ↵
    1. Nishio J
    : Contributions of cytogenetics and molecular cytogenetics to the diagnosis of adipocytic tumors. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011: 524067, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Pedeutour F,
    2. Forus A,
    3. Coindre JM,
    4. Berner JM,
    5. Nicolo G,
    6. Michiels JF,
    7. Terrier P,
    8. Ranchere-Vince D,
    9. Collin F,
    10. Myklebost O,
    11. Turc-Carel C
    : Structure of the supernumerary ring and giant rod chromosomes in adipose tissue tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24: 30-41, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nishio J,
    2. Iwasaki H,
    3. Ishiguro M,
    4. Ohjimi Y,
    5. Fujita C,
    6. Ikegami H,
    7. Ariyoshi A,
    8. Naito M,
    9. Kaneko Y,
    10. Kikuchi M
    : Establishment of a novel human dedifferentiated liposarcoma cell line, FU-DDLS-1: conventional and molecular cytogenetic characterization. Int J Oncol 22: 535-542, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sandberg AA
    : Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: liposarcoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 155: 1-24, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Horvai AE,
    2. DeVries S,
    3. Roy R,
    4. O'Donnell RJ,
    5. Waldman F
    : Similarity in genetic alterations between paired well-differentiated and dedifferentiated components of dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Mod Pathol 22: 1477-1488, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Tap WD,
    2. Eilber FC,
    3. Ginther C,
    4. Dry SM,
    5. Reese N,
    6. Barzan-Smith K,
    7. Chen HW,
    8. Wu H,
    9. Eilber FR,
    10. Slamon DJ,
    11. Anderson L
    : Evaluation of well-differentiated/de-differentiated liposarcomas by high-resolution oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 50: 95-112, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Crago AM,
    2. Socci ND,
    3. DeCarolis P,
    4. O'Connor R,
    5. Taylor BS,
    6. Qin LX,
    7. Antonescu CR,
    8. Singer S
    : Copy number losses define subgroups of dedifferentiated liposarcoma with poor prognosis and genomic instability. Clin Cancer Res 18: 1334-1340, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Italiano A,
    2. Bianchini L,
    3. Gjernes E,
    4. Keslair F,
    5. Ranchere-Vince D,
    6. Dumollard JM,
    7. Haudebourg J,
    8. Leroux A,
    9. Mainguené C,
    10. Terrier P,
    11. Chibon F,
    12. Coindre JM,
    13. Pedeutour F
    : Clinical and biological significance of CDK4 amplification in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Clin Cancer Res 15: 5696-5703, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lee SE,
    2. Kim YJ,
    3. Kwon MJ,
    4. Choi DI,
    5. Lee J,
    6. Cho J,
    7. Seo SW,
    8. Kim SJ,
    9. Shin YK,
    10. Choi YL
    : High level of CDK4 amplification is a poor prognostic factor in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Histol Histopathol 29: 127-138, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Jour G,
    2. Gullet A,
    3. Liu M,
    4. Hoch BL
    : Prognostic relevance of Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer grade and MDM2 amplification levels in dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a study of 50 cases. Mod Pathol in press.
  10. ↵
    1. Dickson MA,
    2. Tap WD,
    3. Keohan ML,
    4. D'Angelo SP,
    5. Gounder MM,
    6. Antonescu CR,
    7. Landa J,
    8. Qin LX,
    9. Rathbone DD,
    10. Condy MM,
    11. Ustoyev Y,
    12. Crago AM,
    13. Singer S,
    14. Schwartz GK
    : Phase II trial of the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 in patients with advanced CDK4-amplified well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol 31: 2024-2028, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Segura-Sánchez J,
    2. González-Cámpora R,
    3. Pareja-Megia MJ,
    4. García-Escudero A,
    5. Galera-Ruiz H,
    6. López-Beltrán A
    : Chromosome-12 copy number alterations and MDM2, CDK4 and TP53 expression in soft tissue liposarcoma. Anticancer Res 26: 4937-4942, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Takahira T,
    2. Oda Y,
    3. Tamiya S,
    4. Yamamoto H,
    5. Kobayashi C,
    6. Izumi T,
    7. Ito K,
    8. Iwamoto Y,
    9. Tsuneyoshi M
    : Alterations of the RB1 gene in dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Mod Pathol 18: 1461-1470, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. He M,
    2. Aisner S,
    3. Benevenia J,
    4. Patterson F,
    5. Harrison LE,
    6. Hameed M
    : Epigenetic alteration of p16INK4A gene in dedifferentiation of liposarcoma. Pathol Res Pract 205: 386-394, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hisaoka M,
    2. Matsuyama A,
    3. Nakamoto M
    : Aberrant calreticulin expression is involved in the dedifferentiation of dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Am J Pathol 180: 2076-2083, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Mariani O,
    2. Brennetot C,
    3. Coindre JM,
    4. Gruel N,
    5. Ganem C,
    6. Delattre O,
    7. Stern MH,
    8. Aurias A
    : JUN oncogene amplification and overexpression block adipocytic differentiation in highly aggressive sarcomas. Cancer Cell 11: 361-374, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Snyder EL,
    2. Sandstrom DJ,
    3. Law K,
    4. Fiore C,
    5. Sicinska E,
    6. Brito J,
    7. Bailey D,
    8. Fletcher JA,
    9. Loda M,
    10. Rodig SJ,
    11. Dal Cin P,
    12. Fletcher CDM
    : c-JUN amplification and overexpression are oncogenic in liposarcoma but not always sufficient to inhibit the adipocytic differentiation programme. J Pathol 218: 292-300, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Peng T,
    2. Zhang P,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Nguyen T,
    5. Bolshakov S,
    6. Belousov R,
    7. Young ED,
    8. Wang X,
    9. Brewer K,
    10. López-Terrada DH,
    11. Oliveira AM,
    12. Lazar AJ,
    13. Lev D
    : An experimental model for the study of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma; deregulation of targetable tyrosine kinase receptors. Lab Invest 91: 392-403, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 1
January 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immunohistochemical, Cytogenetic, and Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of Both Components of a Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: Implications for Histogenesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Immunohistochemical, Cytogenetic, and Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of Both Components of a Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: Implications for Histogenesis
JUN NISHIO, HIROSHI IWASAKI, KAZUKI NABESHIMA, MASATOSHI NAITO
Anticancer Research Jan 2015, 35 (1) 345-350;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Immunohistochemical, Cytogenetic, and Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of Both Components of a Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: Implications for Histogenesis
JUN NISHIO, HIROSHI IWASAKI, KAZUKI NABESHIMA, MASATOSHI NAITO
Anticancer Research Jan 2015, 35 (1) 345-350;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Real-world Delivery and Outcomes of Intravesical BCG for Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Early Progressive Disease Predicts Poor Outcomes of Second-line VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy After First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Evaluation of Quality Metrics for Dose Assessment in Field Overlap Regions of VMAT-Based Craniospinal Axis Irradiation
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Dedifferentiated liposarcoma
  • well-differentiated liposarcoma
  • ring chromosome
  • MDM2
  • CDK4
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire