Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Radiosurgery with 20 Gy Provides Better Local Contol of 1-3 Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer than with Lower Doses

DIRK RADES, STEFAN HUTTENLOCHER, VOLKER RUDAT, DAGMAR HORNUNG, OLIVER BLANCK, PHAM CAM PHUONG, MAI TRONG KHOA, STEVEN E. SCHILD and DOROTHEA FISCHER
Anticancer Research January 2015, 35 (1) 333-336;
DIRK RADES
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rades.dirk{at}gmx.net
STEFAN HUTTENLOCHER
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VOLKER RUDAT
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Saad Specialist Hospital, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAGMAR HORNUNG
3Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
OLIVER BLANCK
4CyberKnife Centre Northern Germany, Güstrow, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PHAM CAM PHUONG
5Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAI TRONG KHOA
5Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEVEN E. SCHILD
6Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOROTHEA FISCHER
7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To determine the optimal dose of radiosurgery-alone for patients with 1-3 cerebral metastases from breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients receiving 20 Gy (n=20) were compared to those receiving 16-18.5 Gy (n=10) for local control, distant brain control and overall survival. Seven other variables were also evaluated. Results: Radiosurgery dose achieved significance on univariate (p=0.002; log-rank and Wilcoxon test) and multivariate analysis (p=0.004) of local control. Twelve-month local control rates were 94% after 20 Gy and 48% after 16-18.5 Gy. On univariate analysis of distant brain control, radiosurgery dose was not a significant factor, with 12-month rates of 73% and 60%, respectively. Regarding overall survival, radiosurgery dose was of borderline significance (p=0.059; Wilcoxon test). Twelve-month overall survival rates were 75% and 40%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, radiosurgery dose exhibited a trend for improving survival (p=0.10). Conclusion: Radiosurgery with 20 Gy resulted in significantly better local control and led to a trend towards improved overall survival compared to treatment with 16-18.5 Gy.

  • Breast cancer
  • brain metastasis
  • radiosurgery
  • radiation dose
  • local control
  • distant brain control
  • overall survival

Patiens with breast cancer account for about 20% of all patients developing cerebral metastases (1, 2). When compared to other tumor entities associated with such spread, patients with breast cancer have a more favorable survival prognosis (3). Many of these patients have only a very small number of cerebral lesions which are often treated with neurosurgical resection or non-invasive modalities, such as radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (4-6). It is not yet clear whether radiosurgery should be supplemented by whole-brain irradiation. The latter has been reported to increase the risk of radiation-related neurocognitive deficits (7). This is particularly important for patients with a more favorable survival prognosis, such as those with breast cancer, because these patients will live long enough to experience such radiation-related late sequelae (3). Therefore, many patients with very few cerebral lesions from breast cancer receive radiosurgery without whole-brain irradiation. When radiosurgery alone is administered, one major goal is long-term control of the treated lesions, which ideally should also translate into longer survival times. However, the optimal dose of radiosurgery for cerebral metastasis from breast cancer is not known. In the present study, two radiosurgery dose levels, 20 Gy and 16-18.5 Gy, were compared for local control of the treated lesions, distant brain control and overall survival.

Patients and Methods

The study included 30 patients with breast cancer who received radiosurgery-alone for primary treatment of one to three cerebral metastases between 2001 and 2013. Radiosurgery was delivered with a CyberKnife (n=6) or a linear accelerator (n=24). The main goal of this study was to compare two dose levels, equivalent to 16-18.5 Gy and 20 Gy (alpha/beta ratio of 10 Gy for tumor cell kill). The doses were prescribed to the margin of the metastatic lesions (isodose level=75-90%). Doses varied according to the concepts preferred by the treating radiation oncologists. The two groups were retrospectively compared for local control of the treated lesions, distant brain control and overall survival. Seven other variables were also analyzed including age (<60 vs. ≥60 years, median=59 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG 0-1 vs. ECOG 2), number of cerebral lesions (1 vs. 2-3), maximum diameter of all cerebral lesions (≤10 vs. >10 mm), extracranial spread (no vs. yes) and time from breast cancer diagnosis to radiosurgery (≤48 vs. >48 months).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of the groups 16-18.5 Gy and 20 Gy.

Univariate analyses of three investigated end-points were performed with the Kaplan–Meier method. The variables achieving significance (p<0.05) or borderline significance (p<0.06) when compared with the log-rank test or the Wilcoxon test were subsequently evaluated in a multivariate manner with the Cox regression analysis.

Results

The comparison of the two dose groups with respect to the distribution of the other seven variables did not reveal any significant difference (Table I). The radiosurgery dose was the only variable that achieved significance (p=0.002 with both log-rank test and Wilcoxon test) in the univariate analysis of local control of the treated lesions (Table II). The local control rates at 12 months were 94% after 20 Gy and 48% after 16-18.5 Gy, respectively. In the subsequent Cox regression analysis, the radiosurgery dose was also significantly associated with local control [risk ratio (RR)=13.86; 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.18-270.27; p=0.004].

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Local control of the treated lesions (univariate analysis).

In the univariate analysis of distant brain control, performance status was the only variable that achieved significance (p=0.041 with the log-rank test). The radiosurgery dose was not a significant factor (Table III). In the Cox regression analysis, performance status showed a strong trend regarding an association with distant brain control [RR=3.26; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.91-11.25; p=0.068].

With respect to overall survival, the performance status achieved significance with both the log-rank test (p<0.001) and the Wilcoxon test (p<0.001). The radiosurgery dose achieved borderline significance (p=0.059) when the Wilcoxon test was used (Table IV). In the Cox regression analysis of overall survival, the performance status remained significant (RR=7.52; 95% CI=2.49-24.82; p<0.001). The radiosurgery dose showed a trend (RR=2.58; 95% CI=0.89-7.94; p=0.10).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Distant brain control (univariate analysis).

Discussion

The results of anticancer treatment are constantly improving, also due to modern diagnostic procedures and identification of prognostic markers (8-10). Due to more effective treatment of the primary tumors and locoregional lymph nodes, more patients live long enough to experience metastatic disease including cerebral lesions. Breast cancer is the second most frequent tumor type in patients developing cerebral metastases (1). In patients with a limited number of cerebral lesions, radiosurgery, either alone or combined with whole-brain irradiation, is an effective treatment option (5). The benefit of adding whole-brain irradiation is controversial. The combined approach leads to improved control of the disease within the brain, mainly by preventing the development of new lesions (11-12). This is of particular important, as an intra-cerebral recurrence results in decreased neurocognitive function. However, whole-brain irradiation itself can also lead to neurocognitive dysfunction, which was demonstrated in a small randomized trial (7). Therefore, many oncologists are hesitant to give whole-brain irradiation in addition to radiosurgery. This applies particularly to patients with breast cancer, who are known to have a more favorable survival prognosis than patients with cerebral metastasis from other tumor entities (1). Thus, many patients with cerebral metastasis from breast cancer receive radiosurgery without whole-brain irradiation. For this group of patients, the optimal dose of radiosurgery alone is not known. The dose should be sufficiently high to provide long-term local control of the treated lesions but not higher than needed to avoid unnecessary damage to the healthy surrounding tissues.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Overall survival (univariate analysis).

In the present study, two dose levels, 20 Gy and 16-18.5 Gy, were compared for treatment outcomes. A dose of 20 Gy provided significantly better local control rates of the treated lesions than lower doses. This superiority almost translated into a significant survival benefit. At least a trend towards better overall survival was observed, when a dose of 20 Gy was delivered. In addition to the radiosurgery dose, the performance status was significantly associated with the outcomes of radiosurgery, particularly with overall survival. This finding agrees well with the existing literature reported for patients irradiated for cerebral metastasis from breast cancer. In two retrospective studies of patients with breast cancer receiving whole-brain irradiation alone for metastasis to the brain, the performance status given as Karnofsky performance score proved to be one of the most predominant predictors of overall survival (13-14). This demonstrates consistency of the results of the present study.

In summary, according to the results of this study, radiosurgery-alone with 20 Gy is significantly superior to 16-18.5 Gy with respect to local control of the treated lesions in patients with 1-3 cerebral metastases from breast cancer. Furthermore, 20 Gy showed a trend towards improvement of overall survival. Thus, if radiosurgery-alone is given to these patients, 20 Gy is preferable compared to lower doses.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    On behalf of all Authors, the corresponding Author states that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.

  • Received September 22, 2014.
  • Revision received October 16, 2014.
  • Accepted October 21, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Khuntia D,
    2. Brown P,
    3. Li J,
    4. Mehta MP
    : Whole-brain radiotherapy in the management of brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 24: 1295-1304, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Shimada K,
    2. Ishikawa T,
    3. Yoneyama S,
    4. Kita K,
    5. Narui K,
    6. Sugae S,
    7. Shimizu D,
    8. Tanabe M,
    9. Sasaki T,
    10. Chishima T,
    11. Ichikawa Y,
    12. Endo I
    : Early-onset brain metastases in a breast cancer patient after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 33: 5119-5121, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Dziggel L,
    2. Segedin B,
    3. Podvrsnik NH,
    4. Oblak I,
    5. Schild SE,
    6. Rades D
    : Validation of a survival score for patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases. Strahlenther Onkol 189: 364-366, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Tabouret E,
    2. Metellus P,
    3. Tallet-Richard A,
    4. Figarella-Branger D,
    5. Charaffe-Jauffret E,
    6. Viens P,
    7. Gonçalves A
    : Surgical resection of brain metastases from breast cancer in the modern era: clinical outcome and prognostic factors. Anticancer Res 33: 2159-2167, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Küter JD,
    3. Meyners T,
    4. Pluemer A,
    5. Veninga T,
    6. Gliemroth J,
    7. Schild SE
    : Single brain metastasis: Resection followed by whole-brain irradiation and a boost to the metastatic site compared to whole-brain irradiation plus radiosurgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114: 326-330, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Yamazaki H,
    2. Nakamura S,
    3. Nishimura T,
    4. Kodani N,
    5. Tsubokura T,
    6. Kimoto T,
    7. Sihomi H,
    8. Aibe N,
    9. Yoshida K,
    10. Koizumi M,
    11. Kagiya T
    : Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with the hypoxic sensitizer AK-2123 (sanazole) for reirradiation of brain metastases: a preliminary feasibility report. Anticancer Res 33: 1773-1776, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Chang EL,
    2. Wefel JS,
    3. Hess KR,
    4. Allen PK,
    5. Lang FF,
    6. Kornguth DG,
    7. Arbuckle RB,
    8. Swint JM,
    9. Shiu AS,
    10. Maor MH,
    11. Meyers CA
    : Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10: 1037-1044, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kokkonouzis I,
    2. Lampaditis I,
    3. Charpidou A,
    4. Kainis E,
    5. Syrigos K
    : Usefulness of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions in a general hospital. In Vivo 27: 655-660, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tsoukalas N,
    2. Kostakis ID,
    3. Siakavellas S,
    4. Giaginis C,
    5. Bournakis E,
    6. Sfiniadakis I,
    7. Karameris A,
    8. Patsouris E,
    9. Theocharis S
    : The clinical and pathological significance of RCAS1 expression as a prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer. In Vivo 28: 375-381, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kyriazoglou AI,
    2. Rizou H,
    3. Dimitriadis E,
    4. Arnogiannaki N,
    5. Agnantis N,
    6. Pandis N
    : Cytogenetic analysis of a low-grade secondary peripheral chondrosarcoma arising in synovial chondromatosis. In Vivo 27: 57-60, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Kueter JD,
    3. Hornung D,
    4. Veninga T,
    5. Hanssens P,
    6. Schild SE,
    7. Dunst J
    : Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus a stereotactic boost (WBRT+SRS) for one to three brain metastases. Strahlenther Onkol 184: 655-662, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Aoyama H,
    2. Shirato H,
    3. Tago M,
    4. Nakadawa K,
    5. Toyoda T,
    6. Hatano K,
    7. Kenjyo M,
    8. Oya N,
    9. Horota S,
    10. Snioura H,
    11. Kunieda E,
    12. Inomata T,
    13. Hayakawa K,
    14. Katoh N,
    15. Kobashi G
    : Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs.stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 295: 2483-2491, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Dziggel L,
    3. Segedin B,
    4. Oblak I,
    5. Nagy V,
    6. Marita A,
    7. Schild SE,
    8. Trang NT,
    9. Khoa MT
    : A simple survival score for patients with brain metastases from breast cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 189: 664-667, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Gerdan L,
    2. Segedin B,
    3. Nagy V,
    4. Khoa MT,
    5. Trang NT,
    6. Schild SE,
    7. Rades D
    : The number of involved extracranial organs: a new predictor of survival in breast cancer patients with brain metastasis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115: 2108-2110, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 35, Issue 1
January 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiosurgery with 20 Gy Provides Better Local Contol of 1-3 Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer than with Lower Doses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Radiosurgery with 20 Gy Provides Better Local Contol of 1-3 Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer than with Lower Doses
DIRK RADES, STEFAN HUTTENLOCHER, VOLKER RUDAT, DAGMAR HORNUNG, OLIVER BLANCK, PHAM CAM PHUONG, MAI TRONG KHOA, STEVEN E. SCHILD, DOROTHEA FISCHER
Anticancer Research Jan 2015, 35 (1) 333-336;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Radiosurgery with 20 Gy Provides Better Local Contol of 1-3 Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer than with Lower Doses
DIRK RADES, STEFAN HUTTENLOCHER, VOLKER RUDAT, DAGMAR HORNUNG, OLIVER BLANCK, PHAM CAM PHUONG, MAI TRONG KHOA, STEVEN E. SCHILD, DOROTHEA FISCHER
Anticancer Research Jan 2015, 35 (1) 333-336;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Individualisation of Radiation Therapy for Older Persons With Secondary Brain Lesions from Carcinoma of the Breast
  • Outcomes After Radiotherapy Alone for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Patients with Oligo-metastatic Breast Cancer
  • A Tool to Predict the Probability of Intracerebral Recurrence or New Cerebral Metastases After Whole-brain Irradiation in Patients with Head-and-Neck Cancer
  • Rotating Gamma System Irradiation: A Promising Treatment for Low-grade Brainstem Gliomas
  • Radiosurgery with a Rotating Gamma System: A Very Effective Treatment for Symptomatic Cerebral Cavernomas
  • A New Prognostic Instrument Specifically Designed for Patients Irradiated for Recurrent Carcinoma of the Bladder
  • Local Therapies Can Improve Intracerebral Control in Patients with Cerebral Metastasis from Gynecological Cancers
  • Outcomes After Whole-brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases with 5x4 Gy: Importance of Overall Treatment Time
  • Potential Impact of the Overall Treatment Time on Outcomes after Whole-brain Irradiation with 10x3 Gy for Brain Metastases
  • Defining the Optimal Dose of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Treating Cerebral Metastases in Elderly Patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Short-term and Long-term Outcomes of Prophylactic Corticosteroid in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Remarkable and Durable Tumor Response to Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced dMMR/MSI-H Rectal Cancer
  • Body Weight Loss at Recurrence as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Recurrent Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy Who Receive First-line Treatment After Recurrence
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • brain metastasis
  • radiosurgery
  • radiation dose
  • local control
  • distant brain control
  • overall survival
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire