Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Excellent Prognosis of Lepidic-predominant Lung Adenocarcinoma: Low Incidence of Lymphatic Vessel Invasion as a Key Factor

KUNIO ARAKI, YOSHITERU KIDOKORO, KEIKO HOSOYA, MAKOTO WAKAHARA, YUKI MATSUOKA, YUZO TAKAGI, TOMOHIRO HARUKI, KEN MIWA, YUJI TANIGUCHI, SATOSHI HORIE and HIROSHIGE NAKAMURA
Anticancer Research June 2014, 34 (6) 3153-3156;
KUNIO ARAKI
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: arakik{at}med.tottori-u.ac.jp
YOSHITERU KIDOKORO
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEIKO HOSOYA
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAKOTO WAKAHARA
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUKI MATSUOKA
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUZO TAKAGI
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOMOHIRO HARUKI
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEN MIWA
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUJI TANIGUCHI
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SATOSHI HORIE
2Department of Pathology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHIGE NAKAMURA
1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To clarify the prognostic value of predominant histological subtypes for small-sized lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four specimens of resected invasive lung adenocarcinoma less than 20 mm in diameter with no lymph node metastasis were studied. These specimens were microscopically classified into predominant histological subtypes (21 lepidic, 16 acinar, 24 papillary, and three solid) according to the International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/European respiratory society adenocarcinoma classification. The relationships between tumor relapse and predominant histological subtypes were statistically analyzed. In addition the relationships between several pathological factors and predominant histological subtypes were statistically assessed. Results: Kaplan-Meier relapse-free curves showed a five-year relapse-free rate of 100% in 64 patients with lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma, compared with a rate of 73.7% (p=0.035 by log rank test) in patients with non-lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma (papillary, acinar, and solid). The only statistically significant pathological factor between lepidic-predominant and non-lepidic-predominant histological subtypes was lymphatic vessel invasion as assessed by logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: In small-sized lung adenocarcinoma, lepidic-predominant histological subtype is the best prognostic factor, and a low incidence of lymphatic vessel invasion in the histological subtype is a key factor for an excellent prognosis.

  • Prognostic factor
  • small lung adenocarcinoma
  • lepidic-predominant
  • histological subtype
  • lymphatic vessel invasion

Lung cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm in many countries. A major histological type of lung cancer is adenocarcinoma, which is frequently detected by chest tomographic scan at a time when it is still small in size. The prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma remains unsatisfactory, even with complete clinical resection at an early stage with no lymph node metastasis (1). There is a great concern to identify the pathological features that will eventually lead to survival benefit in patients with resected invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

A new classification of invasive lung adenocarcinoma was recently proposed by the International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/European respiratory society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) (2). The predominant histological subtypes in invasive adenocarcinoma are classified as follows: lepidic (formerly called bronchioloalveolar growth), acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid with mucin production, and other variants. These predominant histological subtypes may reflect tumor aggressiveness and prognosis.

In this study, we attempted to elucidate the prognostic implication of predominant histological subtypes and pathological factors.

Materials and Methods

Seventy-one specimens of invasive lung adenocarcinoma less than 20 mm in diameter without lymph node metastases consecutively resected between 2005 and 2009 were studied. These specimens of invasive lung adenocarcinoma were surgically resected in 41 cases by lobectomy, in 10 by segmentectomy, and in 20 by partial wedge resection. We classified the 71 specimens of invasive adenocarcinoma into predominant histological subtypes according to the new IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification (2) as follows: 21 lepidic, 16 acinar, 24 papillary, three solid with mucin production, and seven invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (Figure 1). We retrospectively examined 64 specimens of invasive lung adenocarcinoma, excluding the seven residual specimens of invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.

The probability of relapse-free survival by predominant histological subtype was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The significance of the relationships between tumor relapse and predominant histological subtypes was statistically examined by the log-rank test. In addition, the relationships between predominant histological subtypes and pathological factors, including tumor size (under 15 mm/above 15 mm), pleural invasion, lymphatic vessel invasion, blood vessel invasion, and pleural lavage cytology on thoracotomy, were statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were respectively conducted by chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. All p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Tumor relapse (relapse rate) was seen in 10 patients (23.3%) with tumor of the following predominant histological subtypes: three of acinar (18.8%), six of papillary (25.0%), and one of solid (33.3%) type. None of the patients with lepidic-predominant histological subtype experienced relapse (Table I).

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a five-year relapse-free rate of 100% in 64 patients with lepidic-predominant compared with a rate of 73.7% in patients with non-lepidic-predominant (papillary, acinar, and solid) (Figure 2). A significant difference was found between the two relapse-free rates (p=0.035 by the log-rank test). The follow-up period in this study ranged from 10 to 92 months, with a median follow-up period of 54 months.

The statistically significant pathological factors between lepidic and non-lepidic-predominant histological subtypes assessed by univariate logistic regression analysis were lymphatic vessel invasion (p<0.001) and blood vessel invasion (p=0.023) (Table II). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that lymphatic vessel invasion was the only statistically significant pathological factor between the two predominant histological subtypes (p=0.013), which had a lower incidence in the lepidic-predominant histological subtype (Table III).

Discussion

A new histological classification of lung adenocarcinoma has been proposed by IASLC/ATS/ERS (2). Invasive adenocarcinoma is classified into the following predominant histological subtypes: lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid with mucin production, and other variants. The lepidic-predominant histological subtype is likely to be identical to type C adenocarcinoma, according to the classification of small-sized lung adenocarcinoma by Noguchi et al. (3) or bronchioloalveolar carcinoma containing invasive components. Minimally-invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), defined as a small adenocarcinoma (≤3 cm) with a predominantly lepidic pattern and ≤5 mm invasion dimension in any one focus (2), is thought to have an excellent prognosis (4). At our Institute, the specimens of 31 patients with MIA were surgically resected by lobectomy, segmentectomy, or partial wedge resection between 2005 and 2008. No patients diagnosed with MIA had a tumor relapse after surgical resection (data not shown). Invasive adenocarcinoma with lepidic-predominant histological subtype and MIA are considered to have mild tumor aggressiveness and an excellent prognosis (4). As expected, this study also revealed a higher 5-year relapse-free rate for patients with ≤2 cm invasive adenocarcinoma with lepidic-predominant histological subtype (100%) than that for those with non-lepidic-predominant histological subtype (73.7%). The details of the 10 cases of relapse among the 43 patients with non-lepidic-predominant histological subtypes are as follows: 3 out of 16 acinar cases (18.8%), 6 out of 24 papillary cases (25.0%), and 1 out of three solid cases (33.3%). Despite the small size of this study, the results suggest that acinar, papillary, and solid predominant histological subtypes confer a poorer prognosis than the lepidic-predominant histological subtype. The findings are consistent with recent studies (4, 5), which have shown that solid-predominant histological subtype is expected to have the strongest tumor aggressiveness among small-sized invasive lung adenocarcinomas.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Summary of predominant histological subtypes and postoperative tumor relapse rate in 64 patients with small-sized lung adenocarcinomas.

We excluded seven cases of the variant histological type of invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma from this study, because this histological type showed an intrapulmonary relapsing form through bronchioloalveolar spread unlike the common relapsing form of metastasizing to intrapulmonary lesion (6). There were no cases of micropapillary-predominant histological subtype at our Institute, because the micropapillary form is usually a minor component even when present in invasive adenocarcinoma. Nonetheless, the micropapillary component was often floating on the periphery of the tumor site, despite the fact there were no micropapillary-predominant histological subtypes. We believe that the micropapillary component is one of the worse prognostic factors, since most of the 10 cases of relapse in this study had a micropapillary component floating on the periphery of the tumor site to some extent (data not shown).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Predominant histological subtypes proposed by the new lung adenocarcinoma histological classification: lepidic-predominant (a), acinar-predominant (b), papillary-predominant (c) and (d) solid-predominant with mucin production (original magnification, × 10).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier relapse-free curves after surgery for 64 patients with lepidic and non-lepidic-predominant histological subtype small-sized invasive lung adenocarcinomas. Median follow-up time: 54 months.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Comparison of lepidic-vs. non-lepidic-predominant histological subtypes and pathological factors by univariate statistical analysis.

Lymphatic vessel invasion had a lower incidence in lepidic-predominant histological subtype than in non-lepidic-predominant histological subtypes in this study. We previously reported that lymphatic vessel invasion, not blood vessel invasion, was an independent prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma (7). In another study, it was also shown that lymphatic vessel invasion was an extremely useful factor in surveying the biological malignant behavior of lung adenocarcinoma (8, 9). Therefore, this study demonstrated that lymphatic vessel invasion is a very important prognostic factor associated with predominant histological subtypes in small-sized invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Finally, we consider that the new IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma histological classifications are very useful predictors of tumor relapse in small-sized invasive lung adenocarcinoma, particularly between lepidic and non-lepidic-predominant histological subtypes, and lymphatic vessel invasion is strongly associated with pathological factors reflecting differences in tumor aggressiveness between the two predominant histological subtypes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Comparison of lepidic- vs. non-lepidic-predominant histological subtypes and pathological factors by multivariate logistic analysis.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received February 24, 2014.
  • Revision received April 29, 2014.
  • Accepted April 30, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Poleri C,
    2. Morero JL,
    3. Nieva B,
    4. Vazquez MF,
    5. Rodriguez C,
    6. de Titto E,
    7. Rosenberg M
    : Risk of recurrence in patients with surgically resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 123: 1858-1867, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Travis WD,
    2. Brambilla E,
    3. Noguchi M,
    4. Nicholson AG,
    5. Geisinger KR,
    6. Yatabe Y,
    7. Beer DG,
    8. Powell CA,
    9. Riely GJ,
    10. Van Schil PE,
    11. Garg K,
    12. Austin JH,
    13. Asamura H,
    14. Rusch VW,
    15. Hirsch FR,
    16. Scagliotti G,
    17. Mitsudomi T,
    18. Huber RM,
    19. Ishikawa Y,
    20. Jett J,
    21. Sanchez-Cespedes M,
    22. Sculier JP,
    23. Takahashi T,
    24. Tsuboi M,
    25. Vansteenkiste J,
    26. Wistuba I,
    27. Yang PC,
    28. Aberle D,
    29. Brambilla C,
    30. Flieder D,
    31. Franklin W,
    32. Gazdar A,
    33. Gould M,
    34. Hasleton P,
    35. Henderson D,
    36. Johnson B,
    37. Johnson D,
    38. Kerr K,
    39. Kuriyama K,
    40. Lee JS,
    41. Miller VA,
    42. Petersen I,
    43. Roggli V,
    44. Rosell R,
    45. Saijo N,
    46. Thunnissen E,
    47. Tsao M,
    48. Yankelewitz D
    : International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/European respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6: 244-285, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Noguchi M,
    2. Morikawa A,
    3. Kawasaki M,
    4. Matsuno Y,
    5. Yamada T,
    6. Hirohashi,
    7. Kondo H,
    8. Shimosato Y
    : Small adenocarcinoma of the lung. Cancer 75: 2844-2850, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Yanagawa N,
    2. Shiono S,
    3. Abiko M,
    4. Ogata SY,
    5. Sato T,
    6. Tamura G
    : New IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and invasive tumor size are predictive of disease recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 8: 612-618, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Xu L,
    2. Tavora F,
    3. Burke A
    : Histologic features associated with metastatic potential in invasive adenocarcinomas of lung. Am J Surg Pathol 37: 1100-1108, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Gaeta M,
    2. Blandino A,
    3. Pergolizzi S,
    4. Mazziotti S,
    5. Caruso R,
    6. Barone M,
    7. Cascinu S
    : Patterns of recurrence of bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma after surgical resection: a radiological, histological, and immunohistochemical study. Lung Cancer 42: 319-326, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Araki K,
    2. Adachi Y,
    3. Metsugi H,
    4. Tokushima T
    : Prognostic implication of lymphatic vessel invasion in stage IB (pT2aN0M0) non-small cell lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 59: 605-608, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hashizume S,
    2. Nagayasu T,
    3. Hayashi T,
    4. Hidaka S,
    5. Tsuchiya T,
    6. Tagawa T,
    7. Yamasaki N,
    8. Furukawa K,
    9. Matsumoto K,
    10. Miyazaki T
    : Accuracy and prognostic impact of a vessel invasion grading system for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 65: 363-370, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Tsuchiya T,
    2. Akamine S,
    3. Muraoka M,
    4. Kamohara R,
    5. Tsuji K,
    6. Urabe S,
    7. Honda S,
    8. Yamasaki N
    : Stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: vessel invasion is a poor prognostic factor and a new target of adjuvant chemotherapy. Lung Cancer 56: 341-348, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 34, Issue 6
June 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Excellent Prognosis of Lepidic-predominant Lung Adenocarcinoma: Low Incidence of Lymphatic Vessel Invasion as a Key Factor
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Excellent Prognosis of Lepidic-predominant Lung Adenocarcinoma: Low Incidence of Lymphatic Vessel Invasion as a Key Factor
KUNIO ARAKI, YOSHITERU KIDOKORO, KEIKO HOSOYA, MAKOTO WAKAHARA, YUKI MATSUOKA, YUZO TAKAGI, TOMOHIRO HARUKI, KEN MIWA, YUJI TANIGUCHI, SATOSHI HORIE, HIROSHIGE NAKAMURA
Anticancer Research Jun 2014, 34 (6) 3153-3156;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Excellent Prognosis of Lepidic-predominant Lung Adenocarcinoma: Low Incidence of Lymphatic Vessel Invasion as a Key Factor
KUNIO ARAKI, YOSHITERU KIDOKORO, KEIKO HOSOYA, MAKOTO WAKAHARA, YUKI MATSUOKA, YUZO TAKAGI, TOMOHIRO HARUKI, KEN MIWA, YUJI TANIGUCHI, SATOSHI HORIE, HIROSHIGE NAKAMURA
Anticancer Research Jun 2014, 34 (6) 3153-3156;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Pulmonary adenocarcinoma in two alpacas (Vicugna pacos)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Prognostic Impact of Perioperative Inflammatory Status in Elderly Patients With Gastric Cancer
  • Preoperative Serum Total Cholesterol Predicts Adjuvant Chemotherapy Completion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer
  • Predictive Role of PSA Kinetics in Oncological Outcomes of Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • prognostic factor
  • small lung adenocarcinoma
  • lepidic-predominant
  • histological subtype
  • lymphatic vessel invasion
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire