Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

How to Improve the Outcome in Patients with AJCC Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma

ANTHONY Q. YAP, CARLOS A. MILLAN, JING-HOUNG WANG, CHIH-CHI WANG, SEN-NAN LU, SHIH-HO WANG, CHIH-CHE LIN, YUEH-WEI LIU, CHEE-CHIEN YONG, WEI-FENG LI, TING-LUNG LIN and CHAO-LONG CHEN
Anticancer Research June 2014, 34 (6) 3093-3103;
ANTHONY Q. YAP
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CARLOS A. MILLAN
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JING-HOUNG WANG
2Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIH-CHI WANG
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ufel4996@ms26.hinet.net
SEN-NAN LU
2Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIH-HO WANG
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIH-CHE LIN
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUEH-WEI LIU
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHEE-CHIEN YONG
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WEI-FENG LI
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TING-LUNG LIN
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHAO-LONG CHEN
1Division of General Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: Survival of patients with stage I hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is higher than in patients with more advanced disease, however many of them will ultimately die of tumor recurrence and liver failure. Our objective focuses on identifying the pathological and clinical factors that could affect disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition we reviewed the treatment offered for recurrence and its impact on OS. Patients and Methods: Between January 1992 and December 2002, a total of 473 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were enrolled in this study. Relevant clinicopathological and perioperative variables were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 224 patients with a mean follow-up period of 4.6 years were analyzed. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year DFS rates were 82.5%, 57.6%, 46.9% and 32.0% respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates were 91.5%, 83.0%, 70.1% and 56.3% respectively. The multivariate analysis identified age >50 yeas, Indocyanine Green (ICG) clearance test and cirrhosis as independent factors that negatively impact DFS and age ≥50 years, resection type, presence of complications and tumor recurrence as factors affecting OS. In patients with recurrence (n=130), the factors that negatively impact OS were blood transfusion, age ≥50, blood loss and presence of surgical complications. Conclusion: Meticulous surgical technique is the key to improving the outcome of patients with stage I HCC. The presence of complications was the only modifiable clinicopathological factor that affected the OS in our study.

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • disease-free survival
  • overall survival
  • clinical
  • pathological
  • surgical

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is ranked as the fifth malignancy in men and the seventh in women in the world, making it one of the most lethal types of solid-organ cancer (1). The majority of HCC are hepatitis B or C virus infection-related, hence active surveillance for HCC has resulted in a growing number of patients with early HCC. These early cases have the greatest chance of curative treatment, including that with locoregional therapies, mainly radio-frequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection or transplantation. For patients with compensated cirrhosis and early-stage disease, the best treatment options are the first two of these, with surgical resection offering a disease-free survival (DFS) advantage over RFA in some studies (2). From previous studies, we have learned that the survival of patients with AJCC stage I HCC, defined as single tumor without vascular invasion (seventh edition) (3), was superior to that for other stages but many patients ultimately died of tumor recurrence and liver failure (4). There are many well-known prognostic factors (5) for HCC but very few are described in early cases and we found none for patients with AJCC stage I disease.

In the present study, we aimed to identify the pathological and clinical factors that might affect DFS and overall survival (OS) in this group of patients, searching for new modifiable factors we could improve and put into practice, in addition we reviewed the treatment and the patterns of recurrence of this selected group of patients and their impact on OS.

Patients and Methods

Between January 1992 and December 2002, a total of 473 patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan.(6) Of these, 224 patients with pathologically-classified AJCC stage I HCCs were included in this study. All of the patients were operated when the seventh edition of the AJCC was not in use; this is why the pathological diagnosis with the former AJCC editions was revised to fit the seventh edition the AJCC definition of stage I criteria. All relevant data were taken from a prospective computer database for the cancer registry of the hospital. Perioperative and postoperative care evaluation were conducted according to established institutional criteria (6). The intraoperative management and technique in hepatectomy have already been reviewed (5). In major hepatectomy, such as right and left lobectomy, resections were usually anatomical; extended right or left lobectomies were usually non-anatomical; the majority of minor resections were non-anatomical. The mean follow-up period was 4.6 years.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Demographics of 224 patients with stage 1 hepatocellular carcinoma.

Clinicopathological variables. Major resections were defined as removal of more than three segments, whereas, minor resections consisted of removal of fewer than three segments. Cirrhosis was determined by histological examination of the adjacent non-tumorous liver. Histologically, cirrhosis was considered in specimens with fibrosis score of 5-6 using the Ishak scoring system. (7). Tumor differentiation was determined using the Edmonson-Steiner criteria (8). Complications were defined as follows. Prolonged ascites: when the ascitic fluid drainage was more than 500 cc on postoperative day 5 with adequate diuretic treatment; intra-abdominal sepsis: any culture-positive drainage with significant clinical symptoms; liver failure: validated by the 50-50 criteria (9); pulmonary complication: either pleural effusion requiring drainage or culture-proven pneumonia; cardiac complications: mostly arrhythmias necessitating pharmacological treatment; GI complications: gastrointestinal bleeding that prompted endoscopic treatment.

The time to recurrence was computed from the day of surgery to the first follow-up visit at which the recurrent tumor was detected. Patients who died of causes unrelated to HCC were considered disease-free. Survival outcome, tallied from the date of surgery to the date of death or the last follow-up, was verified using the same database and telephone interviews. Hospital deaths, which corresponded to the time when the resection was performed, were included in the overall survival.

Statistical analyses. Continuous variables are expressed as the mean with standard deviation and range values, while categorical variable are presented as frequencies and proportions. The differences between groups were assessed using X2 test for binary variables and t-test for continuous variables. The OS and DFS were estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival method and the differences were compared by log-rank test. All variables with a p-value of less than 0.10 in univariate analysis were further used for multivariate analyses using Cox's proportional hazard model. The threshold for significance was a valve of p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using commercially available SPSS software (SPSS, version 15.0; SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Demographics. A total of 224 patients with pathologically-proven stage I HCC were included in the analyses. The majority of patients were male (79%), aged more than 50 years (62%), with an AFP <400 ng/ml (79%). The mean ICG was less than 10% in 171 (76%) of the patients. A total of 127 (56%) of the patients were HBsAg-positive. Major resections were performed in 136 (60%) of the patients; 97% of the patients had blood loss <1,000 ml and only 12% required blood transfusion. Tumor recurrence occurred in 130 (58%) patients, with most [105 (80.7%)] being intra-hepatic. Postoperative complications developed in 28 (12.5%) cases. The complications consisted of prolonged ascites in 10 (35%), intraabdominal sepsis in 3 (10.7%), liver failure in 4 (14.3%), pulmonary adversities in 4 (14.3%), cardiac adversities in 2 (7.1%), gastrointestinal complications in 3 (10.7%), urinary tract infection in 1 (3.5%) and multiple organ failure due to unknown cause in 1 (3.5%). In-hospital mortality was 2.3% Three patients died of liver failure while the other 2 died of multiple organ failure due to sepsis and unknown cause (Table I).

DFS. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year DFS rates were 82.5%, 57.6%, 46.9% and 32.0%, respectively (Figure 1) (Table II). In the univariate analysis, only age <50 years, ICG≤10%, HBsAg negativity, blood loss <1000 ml and lack of pathological cirrhosis increased the DFS (with p-values of <0.001 to, 0.005. After the univariate analyses, 6 out of 15 variables with p<0.10, including age, ICG, blood loss, blood transfusion, hepatitis infection status, and cirrhosis, subsequently underwent multivariate analysis. After the multivariate analysis, only three variables age <50 years, ICG ≤10% and lack of pathological cirrhosis were ultimately considered independent factors predicting better DFS (Table III).

Recurrence. The mean time in years for local and distant recurrence was 3.0 and 2.3 years, respectively. The overall rate for intrahepatic recurrence at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years was 26%, 42%, 13% and 20% and that for distant metastasis was 42%, 28%, 28% and 0% (Figure 2, TabIe I).

OS. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates were 91.5%, 83.0%, 70.1% and 56.3%, respectively (Figure 3), (Tables III, IV). In the univariate analysis, the most significant variables negatively affecting OS were presence of recurrence and age ≥50 years with p<0.001, followed by the presence of complications with p=0.002 and HBV infection with p=0.05. Other variables with p-values less than 0.1 were blood loss (p=0.05), type of resection (p=0.09), preoperative TAE (p=0.085), Child A (p=0.075) and ICG (p=0.05).

After the multivariate analysis, only four variables, namely age, Child's Pugh status, occurrence of complications and tumor recurrence were ultimately independent factors affecting OS. Intra-hepatic tumor recurrence is the most significant factor with a HR of 3.6 (95% CI=2.1-6.3, p<0.05).

Clinicopathological differences in patients with and without recurrence. In a comparison of OS in patients in stage I HCC with recurrence (n=130) versus patients without recurrence (n=94), the results of the univariate and multivariate analyses were the following (Table V).

In patients with recurrence, the OS at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years was 92%, 79%, 60% and 41%, compared with 90%, 88%, 84% and 77% in patients without recurrence.

In patients without recurrence, the factors that affected OS were age ≥50 years, blood loss and the most significant being the presence of complications, with a HR=5.3 (95% CI=2.0-13.9) p=0.001. The only patient that lost more than 1000 ml of blood died.

In patients with recurrence, the factors that affected OS were blood transfusion with a HR 2.2(1.2-4.3), p=0.06 and tumor differentiation HR 2 (1.1-3.5), p=0.025.

Treatment of recurrent HCC. Sixty-four (61%) patients with recurrence received TAE, 13 (12%) receiving a combination of TAE and percutaneous ethanol injection. Ten (8%) were submitted to re-resection. Three (2%) patients underwent RFA. Figure 4 showed multimodalities of treatment of recurrent HCC.

Discussion

In the seventh edition of the AJCC TNM staging, stage I HCC is distinguished as an early disease as it is represented by a single tumor in the absence of vascular invasion (10-12). The distinction of prognosis between patients with AJCC stage I HCC and more advanced HCC has been clearly illustrated in several studies (1). However, despite the superior survival, many of the patients ultimately die of tumor recurrence and liver failure within five years after resection (13). In our series, the DFS and OS at five years for patients with stage I disease were 46.9% and 70% compared to 39% and 40% for those with stage II (6).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kaplan–Meier curves of the clinicopathological factors that affected the disease-free survival in the univariate analysis: a: AJCC stage I HCC patients; b: age <50 years; c: ICG <10%; d: blood loss <1000 ml; e: hepatitis B positive; f: Absence of cirrhosis. B: hepatitis B virus, NBC: non-B and non-C virus, C: hepatitis C virus, B+C: hepatitis B and C virus.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Univariate analysis of disease-free survival rate.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

a: Recurrence rate of local, distant and local plus distant metastasis. The rate of local recurrence can be seen to climb steadily, reaching a 5-year rate of 50%. The curve of distant and local plus distant metastasis is less pronounced and remains constant at about 5% to 10% per year. b: Timing of recurrences according to type; total: 130 patients; intrahepatic: 105 patients; extrahepatic: 7 patients; both intra- and extrahepatic recurrences: 18 patients. Intrahepatic metastasis tended to occur within the first three years.

Following the multivariate analysis, only 4 variables were ultimately considered independent factors affecting the DFS and OS rates in that order. DFS was significantly inferior in older patients (≥50 years old), with worsened liver function (ICG ≥10%) and cirrhosis. The OS was also significantly reduced by old age (≥50 years old), Child B status, perioperative complications and tumor recurrences.

Of all the clinicopathological factors that affected OS, only the presence of complications was modifiable. Similarly, by carraying out a univariate and later a multivariate analysis of the factors, only blood transfusion in the patients with recurrence patients and the presence of complications and blood loss greater than 1,000 ml in the recurrence-free patients had an impact on OS. The other factors were unmodifiable, such as age, tumor recurrence, ICG and the presence of cirrhosis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Multivariate analysis for overall and disease-free survival.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Kaplan–Meier curves of the clinicopathological factors that affect the overall survival in the univariate analysis: a: AJCC stage I HCC; b: age<50 years; c: ICG<10%; d: blood loss <1,000 ml; e: hepatitis B-positive; f: blood transfusion; g: presence of complications; h: tumor recurrence.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Univariate analysis of overall survival rate by Kaplan-Meier method.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Multivariate analysis of overall survival rate by Cox regression for patients with recurrence (n=130) of hepatocellular carcinoma and recurrence-free (n=94).

The role of cirrhosis in predicting survival of patients with tumors has been demonstrated in several series and was emphasized in the AJCC staging (10-14). Once established, this pathology poses the risk of developing tumor recurrences as a result of multiple carcinogenesis within the diseased liver (14, 15); and its progression can lead to the deterioration of liver function and subsequent liver failure (15). Many authors agreed that since tumor recurrences in a cirrhotic liver emanate from multicentric carcinogenesis and occur at sites distant from the original mass, huge hepatic resections should not be performed in patients with cirrhosis to avert the risk of liver failure, in particular in patients with limited liver function (16). Likewise, several studies have demonstrated that treating such tumors locally, by means of hepatic resection, TAE and RFA, would not halt the progression of the disease. Given these reasons, it is therefore sensible to conclude that the extent of tumor resection, as well as resection margins, would not positively impact patient survival (17).

Interestingly, similar to the current AJCC staging, our findings revealed that sizable tumors (>5 cm) in the absence of tumor thrombosis has no significant effect on the patients' prognosis.

Vascular invasion represents one of the most important risk factors for developing recurrence after complete resection, this might explain the differences in outcome between patients with stage I and those with stage II disease, but even taking this factor out of the analysis, we still had a local recurrence rate of 50% at five years. Hence there must be other important factors that lead to such a high recurrence rate.

The presence of complications has already been shown to be an independent predictor of poor OS in patients with HCC (18), the cause of this is not well-understood but it is hypothesized that complications lead to a state of immunosuppression which might aid in the proliferation of cancer cells (19). The rate of complications after hepatic surgery has been reported to be around 10-20% (19) up to 40%;8 our rate of complications for AJCC stage I HCC is 12.5% (Table I) and although relatively low, it was shown in our multivariate analysis to influence the OS, with an HR of 2.3 (Table II). Ascites complicates 5% to 56% of liver resections (20) cirrhosis and portal hypertension with low platelet count; intraoperative bleeding and major resections are well-known risk factors. Even hepatitis C status carries a significant risk (20). Cirrhosis was present in 41% of our patients, and 90% of our patients had some form of hepatitis and major hepatic resections comprised 60% of our series; this might explain why it was our most common complication. Blood loss in major hepatectomies has diminished through innovative surgical instruments and techniques, including minimally invasive surgery, fast track surgery, and liver-preserving surgery, among others (21-23). On the contrary, not so many advances have been made in the treatment of established liver failure, although we are better now in recognizing and predicting it early in the postoperative period, there is no solid proof that the current prophylactic interventions have diminished its occurrence, (19, 24) and once established, the only curative treatment is liver transplant. Even though all the patients had stage I disease, most of them (60%) were subject to major resections, which consequently carries a greater risk of complications. This can partly be explained by the tumor size, which in 60% was greater than 3 cm and in 30% greater than 5 cm. In addition, there is the fact that at that time, we preferred major anatomical resection to ensure adequate resection margins. This issue continues to highlight the importance of good surgical technique, in order to diminish the occurrence of complications and achieve better outcomes. The in-hospital mortality in the current series was 2.3%, which is in accordance with matched related historical series, (25) and continues to be an accepted result in current literature (26).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Types of treatment for recurrent HCC.

The treatment-of-choice for recurrence is re-resection when the functional liver remnant and the Child score allows it, followed by locoregional therapies. With this type of therapy, we have achieved a 5-year OS for patients with stage I disease of 60%. In the time period the study took place, the most accepted locoregional therapy was TAE; RFA was just starting to gain acceptance. The advantage with TAE is that it can be repeated as the recurrences appear, extending the OS. RFA is gaining more and more evidence as a curative treatment of HCC, especially in stage I disease (early, very early stage) (27). Its place in the management of recurrences is now well established (28, 29).

Recurrences that appear in the first two years after surgery are said to be due to re-growth of remaining microscopic intrahepatic metastatic foci and those that appear after two years are said to be due to multicentric carcinogenesis (30). Our series show that most intrahepatic recurrences present during the first three years (Figure 2).

Patients with stage I disease tend to have better DFS rates than patients with disease in other stages This in fact is the basis for offering salvage transplantation to patients with unfavorable histology and vascular invasion (31, 32). Our pattern clearly shows that the intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic recurrences tend to appear early, even in patients with stage I disease.

It is evident from our analyses that despite the current advances in the treatment of HCC, controlling the rate of tumor recurrence and eventual death following resection remains an urgent task. Our current strategy has provided acceptable OS (70% at five years) and an in-hospital mortality of 2.3% in stage I HCC. Considering our findings, we believe that death from HCC can be reduced through the following approach: proper patient selection and adequate preoperative planning, intensive perioperative care and meticulous dissection to prevent perioperative complications, including bleeding, and in doing so, diminishing the chance of necessitating blood transfusion. Regarding these last recommendations, we strongly emphasize these since they are the only modifiable factors that our analysis showed to have a real impact on the OS in stage I HCC.

Conclusion

In patients with stage I HCC, the DFS is affected by innate patient factors: age, liver function and cirrhosis. The OS is mostly affected by age but also by operative factors and tumor recurrence. In patients without recurrence, perioperative factors and age play a major role in survival, whereas in patients with recurrence, blood loss is major issue.

Meticulous surgical technique and dedicated postoperative care are the keys to improving the outcome of patients with stage I HCC. The presence of complications was the only modifiable clinicopathological factor that affected OS in our study.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally in the preparation of this article.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    None of the Authors have any conflicts to declare.

  • Received January 16, 2014.
  • Revision received April 10, 2014.
  • Accepted April 11, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abrams P,
    2. Marsh JW
    : Current approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Clin North Am 90(4): 813-816, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Wang JH,
    2. Wang CC,
    3. Hung CH,
    4. Chen CL,
    5. Lu SN
    : Survival comparison between surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for patients in BCLC very early/early stage. J Hepatol 56(2): 412-441, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Gospodarowicz MK,
    3. Wittekind Ch
    (eds.). International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 7th ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
  4. ↵
    1. Shimozawa N,
    2. Hanazaki K
    : Long-term prognosis after hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 198(3): 356-365, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Changchien CS,
    2. Chen CL,
    3. Yen YH,
    4. Wang JH,
    5. Hu TH,
    6. Lee CM,
    7. Wang CC,
    8. Cheng YF,
    9. Huang YJ,
    10. Lin CY,
    11. Lu SN
    : Analysis of 6381 hepatocellular carcinoma patients in southern Taiwan: prognostic features, treatment outcomes, and survival. J Gastroenterol 43(2): 159-170, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Wang CC,
    2. Iyer SG,
    3. Low JK,
    4. Lin CY,
    5. Wang SH,
    6. Lu SN,
    7. Chen CL
    : l. Perioperative factors affecting long-term outcome of 473 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16(7): 1832-1842, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ishak k,
    2. Baptista A,
    3. Bianchi L,
    4. Callea F,
    5. De Groote J,
    6. Gudat F,
    7. Denk H,
    8. Desmet V,
    9. Korb G,
    10. MacSween RN,
    11. Phillips MJ,
    12. Portmann BG,
    13. Poulsen H,
    14. Scheuer PJ,
    15. Schmid M,
    16. Thaler H
    ; Histologic grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 22(6): 696-6992, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Edmondson HA,
    2. Steiner PE
    : Primary carcinoma of the liver: A study of 100 cases among 48900 necropsies. Cancer 7(3): 462-503, 1954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Balzan S,
    2. Belghiti J,
    3. Farges O,
    4. Ogata S,
    5. Sauvanet A,
    6. Delefosse D,
    7. Durand F,
    8. et al
    : The “50-50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg 242(6): 824-829, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Vauthey JN,
    2. Lauwers GY,
    3. Esnaola NF,
    4. Do KA,
    5. Belghiti J,
    6. Mirza N,
    7. Curley SA,
    8. Ellis LM,
    9. Regimbeau JM,
    10. Rashid A,
    11. Cleary KR,
    12. Nagorney DM
    : Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20(6): 1527-1536, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Cheng CH,
    2. Lee CF,
    3. Wu TH,
    4. Chan KM,
    5. Chou HS,
    6. Wu TJ,
    7. Yu MC,
    8. Chen TC,
    9. Lee WC,
    10. Chen MF
    : Evaluation of the new AJCC staging system for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 9: 114, 2011. PMCID: PMC3200158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Poon RT,
    2. Fan ST
    : Evaluation of the new AJCC/UICC staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection in Chinese patients. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 12(1): 35-50, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kee KM,
    2. Wang JH,
    3. Lee CM,
    4. Chen CL,
    5. Changchien CS,
    6. Hu TH,
    7. Cheng YF,
    8. Hsu HC,
    9. Wang CC,
    10. Chen TY,
    11. Lin CY,
    12. Lu SN
    : Validation of clinical AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 5,613 cases from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Int J Cancer 120(12): 2650-2655, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Nagasue N,
    2. Uchida M,
    3. Makino Y,
    4. Takemoto Y,
    5. Yamanoi A,
    6. Hayashi T,
    7. Chang YC,
    8. Kohno H,
    9. Nakamura T,
    10. Yukaya H
    : Incidence and factors associated with intrahepatic recurrence following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 105(2): 488-494, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Sasaki Y,
    2. Imaoka S,
    3. Masutani S,
    4. Ohashi I,
    5. Ishikawa O,
    6. Koyama H,
    7. Iwanaga T
    : Influence of coexisting cirrhosis on long-term prognosis after surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 112(3): 515-521, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Poon RT,
    2. Fan ST,
    3. Ng IO,
    4. Wong J
    : Risk factors, prevention, and management of postoperative recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 232(4): 10-24, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Yamasaki S,
    2. Hasegawa H,
    3. Kinoshita H,
    4. Furukawa M,
    5. Imaoka S,
    6. Takasaki K,
    7. Kakumoto Y,
    8. Saitsu H,
    9. Yamada R,
    10. Oosaki Y,
    11. Arii S,
    12. Okamoto E,
    13. Monden M,
    14. Ryu M,
    15. Kusano S,
    16. Kanematsu T,
    17. Ikeda K,
    18. Yamamoto M,
    19. Saoshiro T,
    20. Tsuzuki T
    : A prospective randomized trial of the preventive effect of pre-operative trancatheter arterial embolization against recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Jpn J Cancer Res 87(2): 206-211, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Kusano T,
    2. Sasaki A,
    3. Kai S,
    4. Endo Y,
    5. Iwaki K,
    6. Shibata K,
    7. Ohta M,
    8. Kitano S
    : Predictors and prognostic significance of operative complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatic resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(11): 1179-1185, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. van den Broek MA,
    2. Olde Damink SW,
    3. Dejong CH,
    4. Lang H,
    5. Malago M,
    6. Jalan R,
    7. Sanafer FH
    : Liver failure after partial hepatic resection: definition, pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment. Liver Int 28(6): 767-780, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ishizawa T,
    2. Hasegawa K,
    3. Kokudo N,
    4. Sano K,
    5. Imamura H,
    6. Beck Y,
    7. Sugawara Y,
    8. Makuuchi M
    : Risk factors and management of ascites after liver resection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 144(1): 46-51, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Stoot JH,
    2. van Dam RM,
    3. Coelen RJ,
    4. Winkens B,
    5. Olde Damink SW,
    6. Bemelmans MH,
    7. Dejong CH
    : The effect of a multimodal fast-track programme on outcomes in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicenter pilot study. HPB (Oxford) 11(2): 140-144, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nguyen KT,
    2. Geller DA
    : Laparoscopic liver resection – current update. Surg Clin North Am 90(4): 749-760, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Jarnagin WR,
    2. Gonen M,
    3. Fong Y,
    4. DeMatteo RP,
    5. Ben-Porat L,
    6. Little S,
    7. Corvera C,
    8. Weber S,
    9. Blumgart LH
    : Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection. analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236(4): 397-406, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Schreckenbach T,
    2. Liese J,
    3. Bechstein WO,
    4. Moench C
    . Post-hepatectomy liver failure. Dig Surg 29(1): 79-85, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Mullen JT,
    2. Ribero D,
    3. Reddy SK,
    4. Donadon M,
    5. Zorzi D,
    6. Gautam S,
    7. Abdalla EK,
    8. Curley SA,
    9. Capussotti L,
    10. Clary BM,
    11. Vauthey JN
    : Hepatic insufficiency and mortality in 1509 noncirrhotic patients undergoing major hepatectomy. J Am Coll Surg 204(5): 854-862, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Mayo SC,
    2. Shore AD,
    3. Nathan H,
    4. Edil BH,
    5. Hirose K,
    6. Anders RA,
    7. Wolfgang CL,
    8. Schulick RD,
    9. Choti MA,
    10. Pawlik TM
    : Refining the definition of perioperative mortality following hepatectomy using death within 90 days as the standard criterion. HPB 13(7): 473-482, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Feng K,
    2. Yan J,
    3. Li X,
    4. Xia F,
    5. Ma K,
    6. Wang S,
    7. Bie P,
    8. Dong J
    : A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 57(4): 794-802, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Chan AC,
    2. Poon RT,
    3. Cheung TT,
    4. Chok KS,
    5. Chan SC,
    6. Fan ST,
    7. Lo CM
    : Survival analysis of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for intrahepatic recurrence after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 36(1): 151-156, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Umeda Y,
    2. Matsuda H,
    3. Sadamori H,
    4. Matsukawa H,
    5. Yagi T,
    6. Fujiwara T
    : A prognostic model and strategy for intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. World J Surg 35(1): 170-177, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Kudo M
    : Adjuvant therapy after curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 81(suppl 1): 50-55, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Moon JI,
    2. Kwon CH,
    3. Joh JW,
    4. Choi GS,
    5. Jung GO,
    6. Kim JM,
    7. Shin M,
    8. Choi SJ,
    9. Kim SJ,
    10. Lee SK
    : Primary versus salvage liver donor living transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of microvascular invasion on survival. Transplant Proc 44(2): 487-493, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Scatton O,
    2. Zalinski S,
    3. Terris B,
    4. Lefevre JH,
    5. Casali A,
    6. Massault PP,
    7. Conti F,
    8. Calmus Y,
    9. Soubrane O
    : Hepatocellular carcinoma developed on compensated cirrhosis: resection as a selection tool for transplantation. Liver Transpl 14(6): 779-788, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 34 (6)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 34, Issue 6
June 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How to Improve the Outcome in Patients with AJCC Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
How to Improve the Outcome in Patients with AJCC Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma
ANTHONY Q. YAP, CARLOS A. MILLAN, JING-HOUNG WANG, CHIH-CHI WANG, SEN-NAN LU, SHIH-HO WANG, CHIH-CHE LIN, YUEH-WEI LIU, CHEE-CHIEN YONG, WEI-FENG LI, TING-LUNG LIN, CHAO-LONG CHEN
Anticancer Research Jun 2014, 34 (6) 3093-3103;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
How to Improve the Outcome in Patients with AJCC Stage I Hepatocellular Carcinoma
ANTHONY Q. YAP, CARLOS A. MILLAN, JING-HOUNG WANG, CHIH-CHI WANG, SEN-NAN LU, SHIH-HO WANG, CHIH-CHE LIN, YUEH-WEI LIU, CHEE-CHIEN YONG, WEI-FENG LI, TING-LUNG LIN, CHAO-LONG CHEN
Anticancer Research Jun 2014, 34 (6) 3093-3103;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pelvic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Impact of Surgery on Survival
  • Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Survival and Recurrence Pattern in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy
  • Small Bowel Lipomatosis: An Unusual Radiological Finding in Patients With Renal Cell Cancer on Pazopanib
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • disease-free survival
  • overall survival
  • clinical
  • pathological
  • surgical
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire