Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

PPM1D as a Novel Biomarker for Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

LI JIAO, DAN SHEN, GUANZHONG LIU, JIAOYUAN JIA, JINXIA GENG, HAIBO WANG and YINGHAO SUN
Anticancer Research June 2014, 34 (6) 2919-2925;
LI JIAO
1Bethune Medical Officer School, Shanghai, P.R. China
2Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAN SHEN
2Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GUANZHONG LIU
3Department of Radiology Imaging, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JIAOYUAN JIA
4Department of Immunology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JINXIA GENG
1Bethune Medical Officer School, Shanghai, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HAIBO WANG
1Bethune Medical Officer School, Shanghai, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YINGHAO SUN
2Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sunyinghaoch{at}yeah.net
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1 delta (PPM1D) is involved in several types of cancer. The current study examined the role of PPM1D expression in prostate cancer (PCa) tissues and in PCa cell lines. Expression of PPM1D was evaluated using immunohistochemistry in 234 PCa tissues after radical prostatectomy and 80 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissues. The associations of PPM1D expression with clinicopathological parameters and survival were analyzed. In vitro, tumor cells were transfected with small interfering RNA targeting PPM1D (siPPM1D) or si-Scramble, and the cell proliferation, migration and invasion were determined. We found that PPM1D expression was significantly higher in PCa tissues than that in BPH tissues. PPM1D expression was positively correlated with Gleason score (p=0.022), T stage (p=0.015) and lymph node status (p=0.016). Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed that patients with positive PPM1D expression had shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Furthermore, multivariate analyses showed that PPM1D expression was an independent predictor of both biochemical recurrence-free (hazard ratio=3.437, 95% confidence interval=1.154-6.209, p=0.016) and overall survival (hazard ratio=5.026, 95% confidence interval=2.545-8.109, p=0.007). Knockdown of PPM1D inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion capabilities of PC-3 and LNCaP cells. PPM1D expression may predict for both overall and biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients after radical prostatectomy for PCa. Elevated PPM1D expression plays a key role in progression of PCa.

  • PPM1D
  • prostate cancer
  • biomarker
  • prognosis

Annually, more than 240,000 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) in the USA, and a majority of them harbor local or regional disease with long-term excellent prognosis (1). About half of these men undergo radical prostatectomy and nearly 40% will present with one or more clinicopathological features, such as high Gleason score, extra-capsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement, which are associated with increased risk of metastasis (2-4). Although only a minority of these patients are at risk of dying of PCa, many receive unnecessary additional postoperative interventions, such as adjuvant radiation, and often suffer treatment morbidity (5). Conversely, many men present without adverse clinical features and yet die of this type of cancer. Current tools have limited capacity to identify patients that are most at risk of metastasis and PCa death at the time of radical prostatectomy, leading to suboptimal patient management (6). Thus, more specific and relevant markers should be explored to resolve the unmet need for predicting men with PCa currently at high risk.

Protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1 delta (PPM1D), a member of the PP2C family of Ser/Thr protein phosphatases, is encoded by PPM1D gene which maps to 17q23.2 and is oncogenic (7). PPM1D inhibits p53 signaling and down-regulates p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), thus it is considered oncogenic (8-11). PPM1D overexpression is found in medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, ovarian clear cell carcinoma and breast cancer and is associated with poor survival in breast cancer, ovarian cancer and lung adenocarcinoma (12-18).

In the present study, we examined PPM1D expression in 234 patients with PCa and 80 with BPH. Potential correlations between PPM1D expression and clinicopathological characteristics of PCa were analyzed. The prognostic value of PPM1D expression and its role in PCa cell lines in vitro were also investigated.

Materials and Methods

Patients and prostate specimens. A total of 234 PCa samples were collected from patients with an average age of 64.5 years (50-86 years) at the Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, China. All patients underwent radical prostatectomy from January 1997 to January 2011. The control group with BPH comprised of 80 age-matched patients, with an average age of 66.4 years (58-78 years), who were recruited during the same period. All slices from tumor samples were collected from areas of invasive adenocarcinoma and pathologically-identified according to hematoxylin and eosin staining. The tumor grade and clinical stage of these samples were assessed based on the 2002 TNM classification and Gleason system.

Follow-up. All patients were scheduled to have their serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level evaluated postoperatively every three months for the first year, every six months from the second to the fifth year and annually thereafter. Follow-up data were obtained by consulting the hospital medical records and the PCa database of our Department and by contacting the patients or their family members. Biochemical recurrence was defined as the sustained elevation of the serum total PSA level above 0.2 ng/ml on two or more occasions, and the date of biochemical recurrence was assigned as the date of the first value greater than 0.2 ng/ml. Follow-up time ranged from 3 to 176 months. This study was approved by the Second Military Medical University Ethical Committee (EC1008-32).

Immunohistochemistry. Tissue slices (4 μm) were de-paraffinized and incubated in water with H2O2 for 30 min to remove endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were then immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH=6) and heated in a microwave oven for 30 min. Sections were blocked with 5% normal goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h and then incubated overnight with antibody to PPM1D (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4°C. For the negative control, 5% normal goat serum was used to replace the primary antibody. Staining was detected using a standard avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex followed by hematoxylin counterstaining. Positive staining was defined as the presence of brown oxidized 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) in the given cellular compartments without background signal. The immunostaining scores of PPM1D were evaluated under a light microscope by two pathologists who were unaware of patients' clinical information and determined using a combined scoring system based on the sum of the staining intensity and the percentage of positively stained cells. Scores from 0-3 were given in terms of the staining intensity and the percentage of positively stained cells as follows: score 0, no staining or fewer than 10% of the tumor cells; score 1+, weak staining in 10% or more of the tumor cells; score 2+, moderate staining in 10% or more of the tumor cells; and score 3+, strong staining in 10% or more of the tumor cells. Scores 0 and 1+ were considered negative for PPM1D expression, while scores 2+ and 3+ were considered positive for PPM1D expression.

Cell culture and siRNA transfection. Human PCa cell lines PC-3 and LNCaP were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) repository (Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, USA) at 37°C in an incubator with 5% CO2. PPM1D-specific siRNA and non-specific control siRNA (both from Invitrogen, USA) were transfected into PC-3 and LNCaP cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Western blot. Total protein was isolated from PCa cells. Equal amounts of protein samples (60 μg) were subjected to a 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk and then were incubated with primary antibody (anti-PPM1D, 1:1000; Abcam, CA, USA) or anti-GAPDH (1:2000; Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. The membranes were washed and incubated with specific peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Proteins were detected using the ECL system (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Cell vitality, invasion and migration assay. Cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at a density of 4000 cells per well and cultured for 5 days. Cell viability was determined by using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cell migration and invasion ability were measured by transwell assay. Subsequently, 1×104 transfected cells were plated in the upper chambers of the transwell (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) in fetal bovine serum-free medium and 10% fetal bovine serum-containing medium was deposited in the lower chambers. For cell invasion assays, transwell membranes were coated with matrigel (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) before plating cells. After 24 h, cell were removed from the upper chambers, whereas cells on the lower chambers were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Five independent fields for each well were counted and photographed by microscope.

Statistical analysis. Pearson's χ2 test was used to analyze the association between PPM1D expression and clinicopathological parameters. Survival and PSA recurrence curves were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test. All clinical parameters were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance among three groups. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS16.0. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Correlations of PPM1D expression with clinical parameters in PCa. To investigate PPM1D protein expression levels in prostate tissues, 234 PCa patient samples and 80 age-matched control samples (BPH) were evaluated by PPM1D-specific immunohistochemical staining. As shown in Figure 1, results showed that 132 out of 234 PCa tissues (56.4%) were classified as PPM1D-positive. In contrast, 76 out of 80 (95%) BPH tissues were classified as PPM1D-negative. The PPM1D protein was observed predominately in the cytoplasm of PCa cells.

In addition, the associations between PPM1D expression and clinical and prognostic parameters were also analyzed. As shown in Table I, we revealed that PPM1D expression was positively correlated with Gleason score (p=0.022), T stage (p=0.015) and lymph node status (p=0.016). However, pretreatment PSA levels and positive surgical margin were not correlated with positive PPM1D expression.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Immunohistochemical staining for PPM1D in prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic tissue (×200). A: Score 3+ PPM1D expression in PCa tissues. B: Score 2+ PPM1D expression in PCa tissues. C: Score 1+ PPM1D weak staining in benign prostatic tissue. D: Score 0 (negative) for staining of negative controls with the primary antibody omitted.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Prognostic value of PPM1D expression in prostate cancer. Kaplan–Meier curves showing the impact of PPM1D expression on biochemical recurrence-free (A) and overall (B) survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological features of 234 patients with prostate cancer.

Correlation of PPM1D expression with patient survival. Using the Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test, we found that patients with positive PPM1D expression had shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival time compared to those with negative PPM1D expression (p<0.001, Figure 2A). In patients who had positive PPM1D expression, the overall survival was also significantly shortened in comparison with that of those with negative PPM1D expression (p<0.001, Figure 2B).

Cox proportional hazard model was used to further explore the relationship between PPM1D expression and survival of the 234 patients with PCa after radical prostatectomy. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, we found that positive PPM1D expression was significantly correlated with worse biochemical recurrence-free (hazard ratio=3.437, 95% confidence interval=1.154-6.209, p=0.016, Table I) and overall survival (hazard ratio=5.026, 95% confidence interval=2.545-8.109, p=0.007) (Table III). Our results suggest that PPM1D expression was an independent factor for predicting poor prognosis for patients with PCa in our study.

PPM1D silencing reduced cell proliferation, migration and invasion in PCa cells. Western blot analysis indicated that PPM1D siRNA knocked-down PPM1D expression (Figure 3A). In both PC-3 and LNCaP cells, siPPM1D treatment significantly reduced cancer cell proliferation (Figure 3B and C). In cell migration assay (Figure 4A), siPPM1D treatment significantly reduced cell numbers of both PC-3 and LNCaP cells that migrated across the membranes when compared to si-Scramble treatment after 24 h incubation. Consistent results were observed in the cell invasion assay (Figure 4B). siPPM1D treatment significantly reduced invasion by PC-3 and LNCaP cells by more than a half. These results indicate that PPM1D expression is correlated with cell proliferation, migration and invasion of PCa cells.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Effect of PPM1D-knockdown with silencing RNA on prostate cancer cell proliferation. A: Western blot analysis indicated that siPPM1D knocked-down PPM1D expression. PC-3 (B) and LNCaP (C) cells transfected with si-scramble or siPPM1D detected by MTT. Data are presented as the mean±SD (n=3), *p<0.05 versus the si-Scramble group. 1: si-Scramble; 2: siPPM1D.

Discussion

Although PPM1D has been shown to have a pivotal role in the regulation of p53 signaling pathway in tumor biology, the prognostic role of PPM1D in PCa has not been fully-explored. Here, we showed that positive PPM1D expression is present in 56.4% of PCa tissues in 234 cases in contrast to 5% of BPH tissues classified as PPM1D-negative. Importantly, we found that positive PPM1D expression was significantly correlated with worse biochemical recurrence-free and overall survival. Our results suggest that PPM1D expression was an independent factor for predicting poor prognosis for patients with PCa in our study.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Effect of siPPM1D-knockdown on prostate cancer cell migration and invasion. A: Cells transfected with scrambled siRNA (si-Scramble) or siRNA targeting PPM1D (siPPM1D) for 48 h and after another 48 h, migrated cells were stained and counted under a microscope (×10). Representative images are shown. B: The number of migrated cells is shown (×10). Data shown are the mean±SD from five fields. *p<0.05 versus the si-Scramble group. 1: si-Scramble; 2: PPM1D.

Several lines of evidence have shown that PPM1D plays important roles in tumor biology. PPM1D is considered as an oncogene and overexpression of PPM1D contributes to development of human cancer by suppressing p53 activation (19). PPM1D is up-regulated in neuroblastoma, and pancreatic, lung, bladder, liver, ovarian and breast cancer (13, 14, 20, 21). PPM1D overexpression contributes to malignant progression by inactivating wild-type p53 and p38 MAPK as well as decreasing p16 protein levels in human breast tissues (16). PPM1D has been shown to be a prognostic marker for lung adenocarcinoma patients, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and medulloblastoma patients (12, 18, 22). In the present study, we demonstrated that PPM1D expression was positively correlated with Gleason score, T stage and lymph node status. Furthermore, we showed that patients with positive PPM1D expression had shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival time and overall survival in comparison with that in patients with negative PPM1D expression. We also performed in vitro experiments in PCa cells. The proliferation and invasion of PCa cell lines were significantly inhibited by PPM1D, knockdown, indicating that PPM1D is not only a prognostic marker, but also a potential therapeutic target.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Correlations of clinical variables and PPM1D expression with biochemical recurrence-free survival for patients with prostate cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Correlations of clinical variables and PPM1D expression with overall survival for patients with prostate cancer.

Taken together, the current study revealed that PPM1D was overexpressed in PCa tissues compared to BPH tissues and that high PPM1D expression was an indicator of poor prognosis for patients with PCa. Further studies are needed to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of PPM1D in the progression of PCa.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (81202036) and the Postdoctoral Funds (2013M532143 and 2013M542435).

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

  • Received February 24, 2014.
  • Revision received April 16, 2014.
  • Accepted April 17, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel R1,
    2. DeSantis C,
    3. Virgo K,
    4. Stein K,
    5. Mariotto A,
    6. Smith T,
    7. Cooper D,
    8. Gansler T,
    9. Lerro C,
    10. Fedewa S,
    11. Lin C,
    12. Leach C,
    13. Cannady RS,
    14. Cho H,
    15. Scoppa S,
    16. Hachey M,
    17. Kirch R,
    18. Jemal A,
    19. Ward E
    : Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 220-241, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Hull GW1,
    2. Rabbani F,
    3. Abbas F,
    4. Wheeler TM,
    5. Kattan MW,
    6. Scardino PT
    : Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 167: 528-534, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Patel AR,
    2. Stephenson AJ
    : Radiation therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: adjuvant or salvage? Nat Rev Urol 8: 385-392, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Mishra MV1,
    2. Champ CE,
    3. Den RB,
    4. Scher ED,
    5. Shen X,
    6. Trabulsi EJ,
    7. Lallas CD,
    8. Knudsen KE,
    9. Dicker AP,
    10. Showalter TN
    : Postprostatectomy radiation therapy: an evidence-based review. Future Oncol 7: 1429-1440, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Swanson GP,
    2. Basler JW
    : Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy. J Cancer 2: 1-19, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Crawford ED,
    2. Bennett CL,
    3. Andriole GL,
    4. Garnick MB,
    5. Petrylak DP
    : The utility of prostate-specific antigen in the management of advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int 112: 548-560,2003.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Lu X,
    2. Nguyen TA,
    3. Moon SH,
    4. Darlington Y,
    5. Sommer M,
    6. Donehower LA
    : The type 2C phosphatase WIP1: an oncogenic regulator of tumor suppressor and DNA damage response pathways. Cancer Metastasis Rev 27: 123-135, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Shreeram S,
    2. Hee WK,
    3. Demidov ON,
    4. Kek C,
    5. Yamaguchi H,
    6. Fornace AJ Jr.,
    7. Anderson CW,
    8. Appella E,
    9. Bulavin DV
    : Regulation of ATM/p53-dependent suppression of MYC-induced lymphomas by WIP1 phosphatase. J Exp Med 203: 2793-2799, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bulavin DV1,
    2. Demidov ON,
    3. Saito S,
    4. Kauraniemi P,
    5. Phillips C,
    6. Amundson SA,
    7. Ambrosino C,
    8. Sauter G,
    9. Nebreda AR,
    10. Anderson CW,
    11. Kallioniemi A,
    12. Fornace AJ Jr..,
    13. Appella E
    : Amplification of PPM1D in human tumors abrogates p53 tumor-suppressor activity. Nat Genet 31: 210-215, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Koom WS,
    2. Park SY,
    3. Kim W,
    4. Kim M,
    5. Kim JS,
    6. Kim H,
    7. Choi IK,
    8. Yun CO,
    9. Seong J
    : Combination of radiotherapy and adenovirus-mediated p53 gene therapy for MDM2-overexpressing hepatocellular carcinoma. J Radiat Res 53: 202-210, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bulavin DV1,
    2. Phillips C,
    3. Nannenga B,
    4. Timofeev O,
    5. Donehower LA,
    6. Anderson CW,
    7. Appella E,
    8. Fornace AJ Jr..
    : Inactivation of the WIP1 phosphatase inhibits mammary tumorigenesis through p38 MAPK-mediated activation of the p16(INK4A)-p19(ARF) pathway. Nat Genet 36: 343-350, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Castellino RC,
    2. De Bortoli M,
    3. Lu X,
    4. Moon SH,
    5. Nguyen TA,
    6. Shepard MA,
    7. Rao PH,
    8. Donehower LA,
    9. Kim JY
    : Medulloblastomas overexpress the p53-inactivating oncogene WIP1/PPM1D. J Neurooncol 86: 245-256, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Saito-Ohara F1,
    2. Imoto I,
    3. Inoue J,
    4. Hosoi H,
    5. Nakagawara A,
    6. Sugimoto T,
    7. Inazawa J
    : PPM1D is a potential target for 17q gain in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res 63: 1876-1883, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Loukopoulos P,
    2. Shibata T,
    3. Katoh H,
    4. Kokubu A,
    5. Sakamoto M,
    6. Yamazaki K,
    7. Kosuge T,
    8. Kanai Y,
    9. Hosoda F,
    10. Imoto I,
    11. Ohki M,
    12. Inazawa J,
    13. Hirohashi S
    : Genome-wide array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: identification of genetic indicators that predict patient outcome. Cancer Sci 98: 392-400, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tan DS,
    2. Lambros MB,
    3. Rayter S,
    4. Natrajan R,
    5. Vatcheva R,
    6. Gao Q,
    7. Marchiò C,
    8. Geyer FC,
    9. Savage K,
    10. Parry S,
    11. Fenwick K,
    12. Tamber N,
    13. Mackay A,
    14. Dexter T,
    15. Jameson C,
    16. McCluggage WG,
    17. Williams A,
    18. Graham A,
    19. Faratian D,
    20. El-Bahrawy M,
    21. Paige AJ,
    22. Gabra H,
    23. Gore ME,
    24. Zvelebil M,
    25. Lord CJ,
    26. Kaye SB,
    27. Ashworth A,
    28. Reis-Filho JS
    : PPM1D is a potential therapeutic target in ovarian clear cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 15: 2269-2280, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Yu E,
    2. Ahn YS,
    3. Jang SJ,
    4. Kim MJ,
    5. Yoon HS,
    6. Gong G,
    7. Choi J
    : Overexpression of the WIP1 gene abrogates the p38 MAPK/p53/WIP1 pathway and silences p16 expression in human breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101: 269-278, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rauta J,
    2. Alarmo EL,
    3. Kauraniemi P,
    4. Karhu R,
    5. Kuukasjärvi T,
    6. Kallioniemi A
    : The serine-threonine protein phosphatase PPM1D is frequently activated through amplification in aggressive primary breast tumours. Breast Cancer Res Treat 95: 257-263, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Satoh N,
    2. Maniwa Y,
    3. Bermudez VP,
    4. Nishimura K,
    5. Nishio W,
    6. Yoshimura M,
    7. Okita Y,
    8. Ohbayashi C,
    9. Hurwitz J,
    10. Hayashi Y
    : Oncogenic phosphatase WIP1 is a novel prognostic marker for lung adenocarcinoma patient survival. Cancer Sci 102: 1101-1106, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Bulavin DV,
    2. Demidov ON,
    3. Saito S,
    4. Kauraniemi P,
    5. Phillips C,
    6. Amundson SA,
    7. Ambrosino C,
    8. Sauter G,
    9. Nebreda AR,
    10. Anderson CW,
    11. Kallioniemi A,
    12. Fornace AJ Jr..,
    13. Appella E
    : Amplification of PPM1D in human tumors abrogates p53 tumor-suppressor activity. Nat Genet 31: 210-215, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Hirasawa A,
    2. Saito-Ohara F,
    3. Inoue J,
    4. Aoki D,
    5. Susumu N,
    6. Yokoyama T,
    7. Nozawa S,
    8. Inazawa J,
    9. Imoto I
    : Association of 17q21-q24 gain in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinomas with poor prognosis and identification of PPM1D and APPBP2 as likely amplification targets. Clin Cancer Res 9: 1995-2004, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Wang P,
    2. Rao J,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Zhao H,
    5. Yang L
    : WIP1 overexpression correlated with TP53/p14(ARF) pathway disruption in human astrocytomas. J Surg Oncol 104: 679-684, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Hu W,
    2. Feng Z,
    3. Modica I,
    4. Klimstra DS,
    5. Song L,
    6. Allen PJ,
    7. Brennan MF,
    8. Levine AJ,
    9. Tang LH
    : Gene Amplifications in Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Inactivate the p53 Pathway. Genes Cancer 1: 360-368, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 34, Issue 6
June 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PPM1D as a Novel Biomarker for Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
PPM1D as a Novel Biomarker for Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
LI JIAO, DAN SHEN, GUANZHONG LIU, JIAOYUAN JIA, JINXIA GENG, HAIBO WANG, YINGHAO SUN
Anticancer Research Jun 2014, 34 (6) 2919-2925;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
PPM1D as a Novel Biomarker for Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
LI JIAO, DAN SHEN, GUANZHONG LIU, JIAOYUAN JIA, JINXIA GENG, HAIBO WANG, YINGHAO SUN
Anticancer Research Jun 2014, 34 (6) 2919-2925;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • SOD1 is a synthetic lethal target in PPM1D-mutant leukemia cells
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Delayed Vomiting Upon Irinotecan–Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Pancreatic/Colorectal Cancer
  • MMP-9 Genotypes Serve as Oral Cancer Predictive Marker for Smokers
  • A RANKL-derived Peptide Inhibits RSPO3-LGR4-Wnt Signaling and Lung Adenocarcinoma in Mice
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • PPM1D
  • Prostate cancer
  • biomarker
  • prognosis
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire