Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Contemporary Review of Large Adrenal Tumors in a Tertiary Referral Center

DIANE MEGE, DAVID TAIEB, AOIFE LOWERY, ANDERSON LOUNDOU, CATHERINE DE MICCO, FREDERIC CASTINETTI, ISABELLE MORANGE, JEAN-FRANÇOIS HENRY and FREDERIC SEBAG
Anticancer Research May 2014, 34 (5) 2581-2588;
DIANE MEGE
1Department of Endocrine Surgery, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dianemege@hotmail.fr
DAVID TAIEB
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AOIFE LOWERY
1Department of Endocrine Surgery, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDERSON LOUNDOU
3Department of Public Health, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CATHERINE DE MICCO
4Department of Anatomopathology, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FREDERIC CASTINETTI
5Department of Endocrinology, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ISABELLE MORANGE
5Department of Endocrinology, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JEAN-FRANÇOIS HENRY
1Department of Endocrine Surgery, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FREDERIC SEBAG
1Department of Endocrine Surgery, Aix-Marseille University and Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Large adrenal tumors (LATs, ≥6 cm) are uncommon and associated with malignancy in 25% of cases. Their surgical management remains debatable. The aim of the present report was to evaluate the current incidence, nature and management of LAT. Patients and Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of LATs managed in a tertiary referral center (2002-2011). Results: Eighty-one patients were included (out of a total of 750 with adrenal tumors, 11%). Nine patients had no surgical intervention (11%). Fifty-two LATs were malignant (64%): adrenocortical carcinoma (44%), metastasis (27%) and pheochromocytoma (21%). Patients with malignant tumors exhibited a poorer 5-year overall survival than those with benign tumors (53.4% versus 96.3%, p=0.001). Disease-related mortality was approximately 60%, 29% and 0% for those with metastasis, adrenal carcinoma and malignant pheochromocytoma, respectively. The recurrence rate was the same for the three malignant sub-groups (30%). Conclusion: LATs are rare and more frequently malignant than previously reported. Some are benign and do not require for surgical intervention. Surgical indication and approach should be tailored for each patient.

  • Adrenal
  • large adrenal tumor
  • adrenocortical carcinoma
  • pheochromocytoma
  • malignancy
  • laparoscopy

Adrenal tumors are relatively common (1), with adrenalectomy representing the third most commonly performed endocrine surgical procedure (2). The size definition of ‘large adrenal tumors’ (LATs) varies from 5 cm to 10 cm, with a consensus around 6 cm (3,4). Regardless of what size criterion is used, LATs are considered rare, with an incidence ranging from 8.6% to 38.6% of adrenal tumors reported (4, 5).

LATs are frequently associated with malignancy (3, 6, 7). The incidence of malignancy in patients with LAT varies from 10% to 53% (4, 5), with a consensus of approximately 25%.

If the biochemical investigation of LATs is systematic, the imaging evaluation becomes more standardized.

The surgical management of LATs remains controversial. Some would recommend limited surgery via a laparoscopic approach, while others recommend systematic extensive surgery by the open approach (3-7). Regarding the preoperative work-up, a priori benign tumors do not always require surgical resection, whereas surgery is mandatory for suspicion of malignancy or obviously malignant tumors.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the procedure of choice for small benign adrenal tumors (6), due to its advantages, including reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and recovery time, reduced complications and improved esthetic outcomes (6), considered alongside the potential risks in LAT due to the size of the tumors, which can create surgical challenges. Furthermore, a laparoscopic resection may be less complete, predisposing to local recurrence in the case of malignant tumors. There is evidence to suggest that a laparoscopic approach may be indicated for benign LATs, whereas the presence of large and potentially malignant tumors should be a contraindication to laparoscopic excision (10, 11). Before debating the utility and advantages of a laparoscopic approach, we should first establish the contemporary prevalence and nature of LAT. The aim of this series was to describe current prevalence, nature and management of LATs, defined as those 6 cm or greater, in a single tertiary referral center.

Patients and Methods

Population study. From January 2002 to August 2011, 750 patients with adrenal tumors were referred to the Department of Endocrine Surgery for a complete adrenal tumor work-up. Among these patients, 81 (11%) had a LAT, i.e. at least one of the dimensions was 6 cm or greater. These 81 patients are the focus of the present study. Demographic data were retrospectively collected from medical records. All patients were assessed by a thorough history and clinical evaluation, a hormonal and biochemical work-up, and anatomical and functional imaging to indicate whether surgical intervention was required. The circumstances of clinical diagnosis were noted for all cases, including incidental tumors. A detailed history of previous abdominal surgery was sought from all patients in an attempt to anticipate potential technical challenges, including intra-abdominal adhesions. All adrenal tumors were screened for hormonal excess depending on the suspected pathology. Cortical secretions were investigated by the measurement of urinary free cortisol, serum cortisol, adrenocorticotrophic hormone, renin, aldosterone and androgens. Urinary catecholamine and metabolites were measured for evaluation of adrenal medulla secretions.

Adrenal tumors were investigated using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to define the anatomy and predict the nature of the lesion (radiological features) and to identify local invasion or metastasis. Positron emission tomography with fludeoxyglucose (FDG PET)-CT was performed when LAT did not exhibit features of a typical adenoma. Tumor metabolism was evaluated by Standardized uptake values (SUV)max and the ratio of SUVtumor/SUVliver (12). Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy was used in cases of suspected pheochromocytoma (13). All patients with a preoperative diagnosis of phaechromocytoma received specific preparation to control hypertension, mostly with calcium blockers.

Surgical indications and techniques. Adrenalectomy was indicated in cases of clinically symptomatic tumors (abdominal pain), or hormone-secreting tumors, or with radiological characteristics suspicious of malignancy (not typical adenoma, local invasion, hypermetabolism). Adrenalectomy was performed by two senior experienced surgeons (JFH, FS).

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed using the lateral transperitoneal approach (14). The patient was placed in a lateral decubitus position with the affected side up. This approach permitted a wider surgical workspace with an excellent exposure of the upper retroperitoneum, reducing mobilization and operative time compared to other approaches (15). During the procedure, there was minimal handling of the tumor, especially in cases of phaechromocytoma, and the tumor was placed in retrieval bag for removal from the abdominal cavity. No retroperitoneoscopic approach was performed. Open adrenalectomy, using a transabdominal approach, was performed in cases with radiological characteristics of local invasion.

Histopathology and diagnosis of malignancy. Pathology reports were standardized. A single expert pathologist analyzed all tumors. Molecular analysis (loss of heterozygoty 17p13, Insuline-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) or messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) overexpression) were performed to predict an adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) (16). Additionally, the presence of metastasis on imaging was considered diagnostic of malignancy.

Definitions. There were four distinct types of resection: cortical-sparing surgery, complete adrenalectomy, radical adrenalectomy (removal of the whole gland with surrounding fatty tissue), and extensive resection (remand of adrenal gland with adjacent organs).

Pheochromocytomas were defined according to the Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal gland Scale Score (PASS). A benign pheochromocytoma was defined as having a PASS of less than 4; an undetermined pheochromocytoma was defined with a PASS of between 4 and 6; a malignant pheochromocytoma was defined with a PASS of more than 6 and in the case of metastasis (17). For ACC, the WEISS score was analyzed; a diagnosis of malignancy was made if at least three out of the nine histological parameters were identified (18).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of population study (n=81 patients)

Postoperative morbidity was defined as complications occurring during the hospital stay or within 30 days after surgery. We distinguished surgical complications (i.e. peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscess, wound abscess, hemorrhage, hematoma) and medical complications (i.e. urinary/pulmonary infection, cardiac/neurologic troubles, etc.). Major complications were defined as those requiring surgical, radiological or endoscopic intervention (Dindo III), life-threatening complications requiring intensive care management (Dindo IV) and death (Dindo V) (19).

Follow-up. Postoperative follow-up of malignant tumors included clinical and radiological assessment every three to six months during the first three postoperative years, then every six to 12 months up to a postoperative time of at least five years and afterwards every year. Follow-up frequencies were tailored for each patient and pathology. Follow-up information was assessed using medical records and outpatient clinic examination. When the last follow-up exceeded six months, a telephone interview or an outpatient visit was undertaken with the patient, the general practitioner, or the physician. All patients were allocated to benign and malignant tumor groups according to the pathologist's reports and the follow-up.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Comparison of postoperative complications between laparoscopic and open approach.

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 17.0; Chicago, Illinois, United-States). Qualitative and quantitative variables, expressed as numbers (percentages) or median (range), were analyzed with the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, and the Student t-test or nonparametric Mann–Whitney tests, as appropriate. Overall and disease-free survivals were studied by Kaplan–Meier method, with comparisons between two curves carried out with log-rank tests. Statistical significance testing was set at 5%.

Results

Population study. Over the 10-year study period, 81 (11%) out of 750 patients referred for adrenal tumors presented with LAT. There were 43 males and 38 females, with a median age of 53 (range=14-85) years. Three patients had had previous surgery for contralateral adrenal tumor (one abscess, one phaechromocytoma and one ACC). For 24 patients (30%), the adrenal tumor was found incidentally. Other clinical presentations included hypertension (17%), abdominal pain (17%) or oncological work-up (16%). Twenty-eight patients presented with a functional tumor (39%), with 14 secreting catecholamines, 10 cortisol, two aldosterone and two androgens (Table I). Preoperative imaging investigations included: CT for 74 patients (91%), MRI for 41 (51%), FDG PET-CT for 34 (42%) and MIBG scintigraphy for 16 (20%) patients. One patient, presenting with a primary lung cancer, had bilateral adrenal tumor.

Nine patients did not have surgical intervention (9/81, 11%). There were four patients with metastatic malignant tumors with a short life expectancy (two with metastatic ACCs and two with metastatic lung cancer), and one patient with phaechromocytoma who died of extended uncontrolled disease before surgery. There were four patients with asymptomatic benign tumors (two hematomas, one cyst, one myelolipoma). All patients were followed-up clinically and have not required surgical intervention to date.

Surgical intervention. Figure 1 illustrates the management of the patient population. Seventy-two patients underwent surgery (72/81, 89%). Open surgery (n=24) was indicated due to radiological characteristics of local invasion (n=12), and suspicion of technical difficulties (history of abdominal surgery, tumor size greater than 10 cm). Eight patients (8/48 laparoscopic adrenalectomies) were converted to open adrenalectomy because of intraoperative suspicion of malignancy, requiring for radical adrenalectomy (n=2) or an enlarged resection (n=3) and surgical/technical difficulties due to tumor size (n=3). Tumors requiring open surgery were larger than those managed laparoscopically [10 (range=6-19) cm vs. 7.8 (range=6.1-12.5) cm, p=0.05]. Regarding the type of resection, cortical-sparing adrenalectomy, complete adrenalectomy, radical adrenalectomy and extensive resection were performed in 2 (3%), 17 (23%), 32 (44%) and 22 (30%) cases, respectively. Cortical-sparing adrenalectomy concerned two cases of cysts. Complete adrenalectomy without surrounding fatty tissue was more often performed by laparoscopy than by an open approach (16 cases vs. 1 case, p=0.006), whereas extensive resection was more often performed by the open approach (20 cases vs. 2 cases, p=0.006). Other organs removed during extensive resection were kidney (n=17), spleen with pancreatic tail (n=7), diaphragm (n=2) and lateral patches of the inferior vena cava (n=3). Whatever type of resection, the median operative time was longer by an open approach than by laparoscopy [210 (range=120-360) minutes vs. 150 (range=60-315) minutes, p=0.046). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications between laparoscopic and open adrenalectomies (Table II). Three early deaths occurred (Dindo V), after hemorrhagic shock (n=2) requiring surgery, and multivisceral failure (n=1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flow chart illustrating outcomes of patients referred for adrenal masses.

Pathology. Figure 2 illustrates the nature of LATs. Fifty-two LATs were malignant (64%): 47 underwent surgery and five did not. Eight adrenal metastases were secondary to a lung carcinoma. Other primary tumors included two renal carcinomas, one gynecological carcinoma, two melanomas and one malignant schwannoma. Benign LATs (n=29, 36%) consisted of adenomas (n=9, 31%), benign pheochromocytomas (n=6, 21%), cysts (n=6, 21%), hematomas (n=4, 14%), myelolipomas (n=3, 10%) and neurofibroma (n=1, 3%).

Outcomes. The median follow-up was about 29 (range=0-113) months. At the end of follow-up, two patients had been lost to follow-up. The median follow-up was significantly longer after laparoscopic adrenalectomy than open adrenalectomy [51 (6-106) months vs. 13 (0-113) months, p=0.001]. One- and five-year overall survivals for the whole patient group with LATs were about 87% and 70%. Five-year overall survival was statistically better for patients with benign tumors (96.3%) than for those with malignant tumors (56%, p=0.001) (Figure 3a). There was also a significant difference in overall survival between those with benign tumors and those with the three important types of malignant tumors (malignant pheochromocytomas, ACC and metastases; p=0.0004; Figure 3b). Regarding malignant tumors, overall survival was significantly longer after a laparoscopic approach than after an open approach (75% vs. 41% at five years, p=0.006), as was disease-free survival (31.5 vs. 12.2 months, p=0.007). Taken separately, five-year overall survival of patients with metastasis was worse than that of those with other malignant LATs (38% vs. 66%, p>0.05; Figure 3c). Five-year overall survival of patients with ACC and of those with other malignant LATs was not different (54% vs. 58%, p>0.05). Conversely, 5-year overall survival of patients with malignant pheochromocytomas tended to be better than for those with other malignant LATs (79% vs. 47%, p>0.05; Figure 3d). Five-year overall survival was statistically better for patients with malignant pheochromocytomas compared to those with metastases (87.5% vs. 48%, p=0.02; Figure 3e).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Flow chart illustrating the nature of large adrenal tumors.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Overall survival of patients with large adrenal tumors (LAT). a: Benign (dotted black line) vs. malignant LAT (continuous black line). b: Benign LAT (dotted black line) vs. malignant pheochromocytomas (dashed black line), adrenocortical carcinomas (continuous black line) and metastases (continuous grey line). c: Metastases (continuous grey line) vs. other malignant LAT (continuous black line). d: Malignant pheochromocytomas (dashed black line) vs. other malignant LAT (continuous black line). e: Malignant pheochromocytomas (dashed black line) vs. metastases (continuous grey line).

One- and 5-year disease-free survival of the whole patient group with LATs were approximately 84% and 55%, respectively. Twenty-one patients with malignant tumors (40%) presented locoregional or distal recurrences, at a median time of 17.1 months (range=3.7-57.2 months). The recurrence rate was the same for the three important types of malignant LAT (30% each). Distal recurrences (30%) were more frequent than local recurrences (21%) or peritoneal carcinomatosis (10%). We observed five peritoneal carcinomatoses secondary to two ACCs, two pheochromocytomas and one case of metastasis. This surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) did not influence the number (35% vs. 37%, p>0.05) or the type of recurrences. Overall disease-related mortality was higher for patients with metastasis (60%) than for those with ACC (29%) or malignant pheochromocytoma (0).

Regarding benign tumors, there were three recurrences, at a median time of 40.5 (range=35.1-56.1) months. There was one adenoma, which recurred four years later, and two benign pheochromocytomas, which recurred ipsilaterally for one, and on the contralateral side in the second case. One patient with recurrent pheochromocytoma required surgery: a contralateral cortical-sparing laparoscopy. The two others were followed-up.

Discussion

We herein report the experience of a tertiary referral center regarding LAT. This concerned 11% of patients referred for adrenal tumors. LATs were mostly malignant (64%), whether ACC (44%), metastasis (27%) or malignant pheochromocytoma (21%). Nine patients (11%) did not undergo surgical management because of a short life expectancy due to malignant tumor or because they had purely asymptomatic benign tumors. Other patients were operated on by laparoscopic or open approach, according to preoperative suspicion of local invasion or technical difficulties due to larger size of LAT. The surgical approach did not influence the postoperative course. Five-year overall survival was significantly better for benign tumors than malignant tumors (96.3% vs. 56%, p=0.001), or malignant pheochromocytomas than metastases (87.5% vs. 48%, p=0.02). Recurrence rates were about 30% for the three most represented malignant types of LAT.

LAT remains an uncommon entity, with incidence varying from 8.6% to 38.6% (4, 5). General consensus considers that all adrenal tumors larger than 6 cm require surgical excision. Laparoscopy may be recommended in appropriate conditions (20, 21). We reported non-surgical management for 11% of patients, whether benign or malignant LAT. Indeed, when the patient is asymptomatic, without hormonal oversecretion and radiological criteria of malignancy, conservative management can be considered. For these cases, the optimal imaging adjunct to CT scans and MRI should include FDG-PET scanning, which is likely to influence the surgical decision (12, 18, 22). On the other hand, patients presenting with very aggressive or extensive/inoperable adrenal tumors, may be more suitable for medical treatment rather than surgery. In this palliative management, follow-up shoud be mostly based on clinical criteria to treat symptoms. Intensive imaging follow-up would not be appropriate. To our knowledge, no study describes observation instead of surgery in the management of LAT.

When surgery is indicated, there is a wide range of surgical techniques which may be employed, including cortical-sparing to extensive resection and with laparoscopic or open approach. The laparoscopic approach is currently controversial in LAT management (3-7). Although we reported some significant differences between laparoscopic and open approaches, regarding LAT size, type of resection or follow-up, the present objective was not to compare these approaches in LAT. Furthermore, types of adrenal resection are also discussed elsewhere, such as indication of cortical-sparing adrenalectomy for cysts (23). We consider that establishing the prevalence and nature of LAT is essential before debating about indications of laparoscopic approach or types of resection.

The reported risk of malignancy for LAT (>6 cm) is approximately 25%, but varies considerably in the literature from 10% to 53% (4, 5). In our experience, the rate of malignancy is much higher than usually reported, about 64%. This may be explained by a recruitment bias, due to the tertiary referral Center. However, these data indicate that the prevalence of malignancy may be under-reported in the population of patients with LAT.

In the current series, malignant LAT mostly concerned ACCs (44%), metastasis (27%) and pheochromocytomas (21%). These results are equivalent to some other series of LAT (3, 4, 24-26). However, the audit of the French Onco-Urology group considered malignant LAT as rare, and metastases to be more frequent than ACCs (0.5-2/million) and pheochromocytomas (0.6/million). Moreover, others considered the proportion of ACC within LAT to be 25% to 98% (1). The current series has a larger number of LATs than previous reports (5, 10) and thus may be more representative of the true prevalence of malignancy of these tumors.

Regarding survival, we observed that among malignant tumors, patients with metastasis and ACCs had poorer outcomes than those with malignant pheochromocytomas. For ACC, the survival rates are difficult to interpret, as there was significant variation within this sub-group. These results correspond to previous reports of mortality rates varying between 30% and 50% for metastasis and ACCs (3, 24), whereas very few deaths were observed for those with pheochromocytomas (27-29). As the recurrence rate is practically the same for the three pathologies, these results indicate that the natural history of these three pathologies is different, and is the main determinant of outcome.

Finally, LATs are rare. These are often malignant tumors with a potentially poor prognosis. Management of LAT remains controversial. Clinical and biological work-up is codified. Anatomical imaging studies are standardized and guided by the hormonal and biochemical profile of the tumor. Increasing evidence suggests that that introduction of functional imaging studies, especially PET scan, will improve the diagnosis and management of LAT (30). Not all patients will require surgery. When surgery is indicated, there is a wide range of surgical techniques which may be employed from cortical-sparing to extensive resection and laparoscopic to open approach. In our opinion, surgical management should be tailored to the individual case. In the management of LAT, it is important to remember that appropriate preoperative work-up (biochemical and radiological) and informed surgical decision-making are critical in order to select the appropriate management strategy, including the surgical approach. As we noticed after the introduction of a focused approach in parathyroid surgery, patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy for LAT had more follow-up than patients who had an open surgical approach (31); this likely reflects the requirement for careful selection and close follow-up of patients managed with innovative approaches.

Conclusion

LATs are rare. Selected cases can be managed without surgical intervention. Some will require extensive surgery. Due to the rarity and potential aggressiveness of these tumors, we advocate their management in a tertiary referral center from diagnostic work-up to therapeutic management and follow-up. Centralizing the management of these tumors to tertiary referral centers will facilitate accurate data collection in order to improve our current understanding of the nature and prevalence of malignancy in LAT, which will further optimize the tailored management of these tumors.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    There are no potential or actual, personal, political, or financial interests by any of the Authors in the material, information, or techniques described herein. All Authors have seen and approved the manuscript and are fully conversant with its contents.

  • Received March 9, 2014.
  • Revision received March 20, 2014.
  • Accepted March 21, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sèbe P,
    2. Rigaud J,
    3. Avancès C,
    4. Brunaud L,
    5. Caillard C,
    6. Camparo P,
    7. Carnaille B,
    8. Culine S,
    9. Durand X,
    10. Mathonnet M,
    11. Mirallie,
    12. Soulie M
    : Malignant tumors of the adrenal: contribution to the repository CCAFU INCa. Prog Urol 20 (Suppl 4): S310-316, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Germain A,
    2. Klein M,
    3. Brunaud L
    : Surgical management of adrenal tumors. J Visc Surg 148(4): e250-261, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Liao C-H,
    2. Chueh S-C,
    3. Lai M-K,
    4. Hsiao P-J,
    5. Chen J
    : Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for potentially malignant adrenal tumors greater than 5 centimeters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(8): 3080-3083, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Zografos GN,
    2. Farfaras A,
    3. Vasiliadis G,
    4. Pappa T,
    5. Aggeli C,
    6. Vasilatou E,
    7. Kaltsas G,
    8. Piaditis G
    : Laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. JSLS 14(3): 364-368, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Parnaby CN,
    2. Chong PS,
    3. Chisholm L,
    4. Farrow J,
    5. Connell JM,
    6. O'Dwyer PJ
    : The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours of 6 cm or greater. Surg Endosc 22(3): 617-621, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Palazzo FF,
    2. Sebag F,
    3. Sierra M,
    4. Ippolito G,
    5. Souteyrand P,
    6. Henry J-F
    : Long-term outcome following laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large solid adrenal cortex tumors. World J Surg 330(5): 893-898, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Henry J-F,
    2. Sebag F,
    3. Iacobone M,
    4. Mirallie E
    : Results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large and potentially malignant tumors. World J Surg 26(8): 1043-1047, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gagner M,
    2. Lacroix A,
    3. Bolté E
    : Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 327(14): 1033, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Jacobs JK,
    2. Goldstein RE,
    3. Geer RJ
    : Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A new standard of care. Ann Surg 225(5): 495-501; discussion 501-502, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. MacGillivray DC,
    2. Whalen GF,
    3. Malchoff CD,
    4. Oppenheim DS,
    5. Shichman SJ
    : Laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 9(5): 480-485, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Naya Y,
    2. Suzuki H,
    3. Komiya A,
    4. Nagata M,
    5. Tobe T,
    6. Ueda T,
    7. Ichikawa T,
    8. Igarashi T,
    9. Yamaguchi K,
    10. Ito H
    : Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with large adrenal tumors. Int J Urol 12(2): 134-139, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Weiss LM
    : Comparative histologic study of 43 metastasing and nonmetastasing adrenocortical tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 8: 163-169, 1984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ansquer C,
    2. Scigliano S,
    3. Mirallié E,
    4. Taïeb D,
    5. Brunaud L,
    6. Sebag F,
    7. Leux C,
    8. Drui D,
    9. Renaudin K,
    10. Kraeber-Bodere F
    : 18F-FDG PET/CT in the characterization and surgical decision concerning adrenal masses: a prospective multicentre evaluation. Eur. J. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(9): 1669-1678, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Taïeb D,
    2. Sebag F,
    3. Hubbard JG,
    4. Mundler O,
    5. Henry JF,
    6. Conte-Devolx B
    : Does iodine-131 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy have an impact on the management of sporadic and familial phaeochromocytoma? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 61(1): 102-108, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Gagner M,
    2. Pomp A,
    3. Heniford BT,
    4. Pharand D,
    5. Lacroix A
    : Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 226(3): 238-246; discussion 246-247, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Gust L,
    2. Taieb D,
    3. Beliard A,
    4. Barlier A,
    5. Morange I,
    6. de Micco C,
    7. Henry J-F,
    8. Sebag F
    : Preoperative 18F-FDG uptake is strongly correlated with malignancy, Weiss score, and molecular markers of aggressiveness in adrenal cortical tumors. World J Surg 36(6): 1406-1410, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Karanikola E,
    2. Tsigris C,
    3. Kontzoglou K,
    4. Nikiteas N
    : Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: where do we stand now? Tohoku J Exp Med 220(4): 259-265, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Wu D,
    2. Tischler AS,
    3. Lloyd RV,
    4. DeLellis RA,
    5. de Krijger R,
    6. van Nederveen F,
    7. Nose V
    : Observer variation in the application of the Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal Gland Scaled Score. Am J Surg Pathol 33(4): 599-608, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Dindo D,
    2. Demartines N,
    3. Clavien PA
    : Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240: 205-213, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    NIH state-of-the-science statement on management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass (‘incidentaloma’). NIH Consens State Sci Statements 19(2): 1-25, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Brunaud L,
    2. Kebebew E,
    3. Sebag F,
    4. Zarnegar R,
    5. Clark OH,
    6. Duh Q-Y
    : Observation or laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma? A surgical decision analysis. Med. Sci. Monit 12(9): CR355-362, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Tessonnier L,
    2. Sebag F,
    3. Palazzo FF,
    4. Colavolpe C,
    5. De Micco C,
    6. Mancini J,
    7. Conte-Devolx B,
    8. Henry JF,
    9. Mundler O,
    10. Taïeb D
    : Does 18F-FDG PET/CT add diagnostic accuracy in incidentally identified non-secreting adrenal tumours? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(11): 2018-2025, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hardy R,
    2. Lennard TWJ
    : Subtotal adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 95(9): 1075-1076, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Sharma R,
    2. Ganpule A,
    3. Veeramani M,
    4. Sabnis RB,
    5. Desai M
    : Laparoscopic management of adrenal lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter. Urol J 6(4): 254-259, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Ramacciato G,
    2. Mercantini P,
    3. La Torre M,
    4. Di Benedetto F,
    5. Ercolani G,
    6. Ravaioli M,
    7. Piccoli M,
    8. Melotti G
    : Is laparoscopic adrenalectomy safe and effective for adrenal masses larger than 7 cm? Surg Endosc 22(2): 516-521, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Sturgeon C,
    2. Shen WT,
    3. Clark OH,
    4. Duh Q-Y,
    5. Kebebew E
    : Risk assessment in 457 adrenal cortical carcinomas: how much does tumor size predict the likelihood of malignancy? J Am Coll Surg 202(3): 423-430, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ippolito G,
    2. Palazzo FF,
    3. Sebag F,
    4. Thakur A,
    5. Cherenko M,
    6. Henry J-F
    : Safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with large pheochromocytomas: a single institution review. World J Surg 32(5): 840-844; discussion 845-846, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kercher KW,
    2. Novitsky YW,
    3. Park A,
    4. Matthews BD,
    5. Litwin DEM,
    6. Heniford BT
    : Laparoscopic curative resection of pheochromocytomas. Ann Surg 241(6): 919-926; discussion 926-928, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Dimas S,
    2. Roukounakis N,
    3. Kafetzis I,
    4. Bethanis S,
    5. Anthi S,
    6. Michas S,
    7. Kyriakou V,
    8. Kostas H
    : Feasibility of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytomas. JSLS 11(1): 30-33, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Tessonnier L,
    2. Ansquer C,
    3. Bournaud C,
    4. Sebag F,
    5. Mirallie E,
    6. Lifante JC,
    7. Palazzo FF,
    8. Morange I,
    9. Drui D,
    10. De la Fourcadère C,
    11. Mancini J,
    12. Taïeb D
    : 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake at initial staging of the adrenocortical cancers: a diagnostic tool but not of prognosis value. World J Surg Jan 37(1): 107-112, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Henry J-F,
    2. Sebag F,
    3. Ippolito G
    : Endoscopic parathyroidectomy through a lateral approach. J Chir (Paris) 145(5): 470-474, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 34 (5)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 34, Issue 5
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contemporary Review of Large Adrenal Tumors in a Tertiary Referral Center
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Contemporary Review of Large Adrenal Tumors in a Tertiary Referral Center
DIANE MEGE, DAVID TAIEB, AOIFE LOWERY, ANDERSON LOUNDOU, CATHERINE DE MICCO, FREDERIC CASTINETTI, ISABELLE MORANGE, JEAN-FRANÇOIS HENRY, FREDERIC SEBAG
Anticancer Research May 2014, 34 (5) 2581-2588;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Contemporary Review of Large Adrenal Tumors in a Tertiary Referral Center
DIANE MEGE, DAVID TAIEB, AOIFE LOWERY, ANDERSON LOUNDOU, CATHERINE DE MICCO, FREDERIC CASTINETTI, ISABELLE MORANGE, JEAN-FRANÇOIS HENRY, FREDERIC SEBAG
Anticancer Research May 2014, 34 (5) 2581-2588;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Prognosis of Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression from Adrenocortical Carcinoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Novel Filtration Membrane for Clustered Circulating Tumor Cell Extraction: A Prospective Feasibility Study
  • Atezolizumab for EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: An Observation Study in Ibaraki Group (ATTENTION-IBARAKI)
  • Early Phase Persistent Changes in the White Blood Cell Fraction in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Pembrolizumab: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • adrenal
  • large adrenal tumor
  • Adrenocortical carcinoma
  • Pheochromocytoma
  • malignancy
  • Laparoscopy
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire