Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Differential Spheroid Formation by Oral Cancer Cells

CARLIN LEE, CASEY LEE, AMHA ATAKILIT, AMANDA SIU and DANIEL M. RAMOS
Anticancer Research December 2014, 34 (12) 6945-6949;
CARLIN LEE
1Department of Orofacial Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CASEY LEE
1Department of Orofacial Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AMHA ATAKILIT
2Department of Medicine, Lung Biology Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AMANDA SIU
3Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Texas, Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DANIEL M. RAMOS
1Department of Orofacial Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Daniel.ramos{at}ucsf.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) make up 96% of all oral cancers. Most laboratory SCC studies grow cells as a monolayer, which does not accurately represent the disease in vivo. We used a more relevant multicellular spheroid (MCS) model to study this disease. The SCC9β6KDFyn cell line, which expresses full-length β6 and a kinase dead Fyn formed the largest MCS. Cell adhesive properties are dynamic and N-cadherin was increased in the largest MCS. c-Raf mediates the survival of tumor cells and was consistently expressed both in monolayers and in the MCS by SCC9β6D1 cells which lack the β6 cytoplasmic tail and, do not activate Fyn. SCC9β6KDFyn cells also express high levels of c-Raf when grown as spheroids in which Fyn suppression stimulates MCS formation. Tumor microenvironment and growth patterns modulate cell behavior and suppression of Fyn kinase may promote MCS growth.

  • Spheroid
  • E-cadherin
  • N-cadherin
  • c-Raf

Oral cancers are the sixth most common type of cancer in the world. In the United States, 37,000 new cases are diagnosed and 8,000 individuals die each year. Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) make up 96% of all oral cancers. Despite advances in treatment, such as surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, the prognosis for oral SCC has not improved in over 60 years. The poor prognosis of SCC is due to invasion and local recurrence. The 5-year survival rate for oral SCC is approximately 50% (1). Interactions between primary SCC cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) facilitate invasion.

SCC cells undergo a transformation process known as the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Previous studies show that the αvβ6 integrin, an epithelial specific integrin, is instrumental to EMT in colorectal and oral cancer (2, 3). EMT involves changes in expression, distribution and function of a number of proteins for cells between the epithelial and mesenchymal phenotype. Changes in the expression profiles of members of the cadherin family result in the loss of cell-cell adhesion between adjacent cells. Loss of E-cadherin expression correlates with an invasive and undifferentiated phenotype (4). Additionally, de novo expression of the adhesion receptor N-cadherin is associated with a heightened invasive capacity in both prostate and breast cancer cells (5, 6).

Signal transduction via the ERK pathway is essential for the regulation of SCC growth and proliferation (7). c-Raf is central to tumor cell survival and its expression has been found to be elevated in breast cancer cells (8). In the human body, cells are typically organized in three-dimensional structures with extensive cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions that cannot be reproduced in two-dimensional monolayers of cell cultures. In this investigation, we use generation of multicellular spheroids (MCS) in SCC cell lines to understand the process of tumor formation. We examined the effect of the tumor microenvironment on spheroid formation and the expression of proteins that are involved in the development of oral SCC.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines. The SCC9 cell line was derived from a base of tongue lesion and was a generous gift from Dr. James Reinwald (Brigham and Woman's Hospital, Harvard School of Medicine). The SCC9β6 cell line was established by stable transfection of the SCC9 cells with the cDNA for full length β6 (9). The SCC9β6 cells were transduced with the cDNA for a kinase-dead (KD) Fyn or a truncated β6 cDNA lacking the C-terminal 11 AA to establish the SCC9β6KDFyn and the SCC9β6D1 lines, respectively (3, 9). The KDFyn cDNA was a generous gift of Dr. H. Kawakatsu (University of California, San Francisco). The cDNA for the full length β6 and the cytoplasmic deletion were generously provided by Dr. Dean Sheppard (University of California, San Francisco).

Generation of multicellular spheroids. Tissue culture plates (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) were treated with a 0.6% agarose solution and air dried overnight at room temperature. Cells were harvested from monolayer cultures with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA and rinsed twice to remove serum. The cells were then placed on agarose-coated plates and allowed to form multicellular spheroids for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 in serum-free media.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Differential multicellular spheroid formation by oral SCC cells. Oral SCC9β6KDFyn (A); SCC9β6 (B); SCC9β6D1 (C) and the SCC9 (D) cells were plated serum-free onto agarose coated dishes for 48 h to promote spheroid formation. After 48 h, the assay was terminated and photomicrographs were taken and evaluated. SCC9β6KDFyn cells formed the largest MCS (A). The formation of MCS was as follows SCC9β6KDFyn>SCC9β6≥SCC9>SCC9β6D1 cells. The assay was performed in triplicate.

Antibodies. Rabbit monoclonal antibodies to E-Cadherin (clone 24E10) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc., (Danvers, MA, USA). Rabbit monoclonal antibodies to N-Cadherin (clone #4061) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc.. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to c-Raf (clone C-12) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Rabbit monoclonal antibodies to β-actin (clone13E5) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (clone7074) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc.

Western blot. Cells were grown either as monolayers or spheroids in serum-free media for 24 hours prior to lysing. Total protein was extracted from cells with RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 0.2% SDS, 1% deoxycholic acid, 1% Triton X-100, complete protease inhibitor tablet). Protein was resolved by SDS-Page and transferred to a PVDF membrane using a semi-dry apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Membranes were incubated with monoclonal antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing, the blots were incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies for 1 hour. The blots were then treated with ECL substrate (Thermo Scientific Pierce; Rockford, IL, USA) and exposed to x-ray film (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Results

Differential spheroid formation of oral SCC cells. Oral SCC cells remodel their microenvironment. We previously found that when embedded into Matrigel, the SCC9β6 cells formed crude vessel-like structures (10). However we wished to evaluate a more physiologically-relevant model. We used an MCS that mimics the 3-dimensional organization of a tumor. The SCC9, SCC9β6, SCC9β6D1 and SCC9β6KDFyn cells were plated onto agarose coated tissue-culture dish in serum-free media allowing them to form spheroids for 48 hours. The SCC9β6KDFyn cells formed large over-sized spheres compared with much smaller structures formed by the SCC9 and the SCC9β6 cells (Figure 1). The SCC9β6D1cells formed diminutive clusters containing 2-4 cells (Figure 1). The size of the SCC spheroids was as follows: SCC9β6KDFyn>SCC9β6≥SCC9>SCC9β6D1 cells (Figure 1). The greatest spheroid formation occurs in the presence of the full-length β6 and a kinase-dead Fyn.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Differential expression of E-cadherin in monolayer vs. MCS in oral SCC. Oral SCC cells were grown as monolayers for 48 h under serum-free conditions (A). After 48 h, the cells were washed, lysed and analyzed by Western blotting for expression of E-cadherin. SCC9 (lane 1); SCC9β6 (lane 2); SCC9β6D1 (lane 3) and SCC9β6KDFyn (lane 4). Actin was used as a loading control. The cells were then grown as MCS for 48 h and then analyzed for expression of E-cadherin. SCC9 (lane 1), SCC9β6 (lane 2); SCC9β6D1 (lane 3); and SCC9β6KDFyn (lane 4). Actin was used as a loading control. RVUs (relative value units) were determined by densitometry.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Differential expression of N-cadherin in monolayers vs. MCS in oral SCC cells. Oral SCC cells were grown as monolayers for 48 h under serum-free conditions. After 48 h, the cells were washed, lysed and analyzed by Western blotting for expression of N-cadherin. SCC9 (lane 1); SCC9β6 (lane 2); SCC9β6D1; and SCC9β6 KDFyn cells. The cells were then grown as MCS for 48 hr and analyzed for expression of N-cadherin. MCS were lysed and analyzed by Western blotting for N-cadherin. SCC9 (lane 1), SCC9β6 (lane 2); SCC9β6D1 (lane 3); and SCC9β6KDFyn (lane 4). Actin was used as a loading control. RVUs (relative value units) were determined by densitometry.

Differential expression of E-cadherin by oral SCC cells. Decreased E-cadherin expression is associated with a loss of differentiation and aggressive behavior in a number of human carcinomas (11). We evaluated E-cadherin expression among SCC cell lines grown in monolayers versus spheroids. When grown as a monolayer, the SCC9 and SCC9β6D1 expressed significant levels of E-cadherin (relative value units (rvu): 5.0), whereas E-cadherin expression was undetectable in the SCC9β6 and SCC9β6KDFyn (Figure 2). However, when grown as spheroids, the SCC9, SCC9β6 and SCC9β6D1cells expressed similar levels of E-cadherin (rvu: 5.0), which was more than 10 times greater than the expression seen in the SCC9β6KDFyn cells (Figure 2). The increase in E-cadherin by the SCC9β6 cells may be a response to new stress encountered when the cells form spheroids. The absence of E-cadherin expression by the SCC9β6KDFyn cells was independent of monolayer or spheroid status.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Differential expression of RAF in monolayers vs. MCS. SCC cells were grown as monolayers for 48 h under serum-free conditions, lysed and analyzed by Western blotting for expression of RAF. SCC9(lane 1); SCC9β6 (lane 2); SCC9β6D1 (lane 3) and SCC9β6KDFyn (lane 4). The cells were allowed to form MCS under serum-free conditions for 48 h. The cells were lysed and analyzed by Western blot for expression of RAF. SCC9 (lane 1); SCC9β6 (lane 2); SCC9β6D1 (lane 3); and SCC9β6KDFyn (lane 4). Actin was used as a loading control. RVUs (relative value units) were determined by densitometry.

Differential expression of N-cadherin. The expression of N-cadherin induces a mesenchymal phenotype in squamous epithelial cells (12). We evaluated N-cadherin expression among SCC cell lines grown in monolayers versus spheroids. When cells were grown as monolayers, N-cadherin was highly expressed by the invasive SCC9β6 cell line (rvu: 3.0). N-cadherin expression in the SCC9β6 cell line was three times as great when compared to the SCC9 cell line (rvu: 1.0) and SCC9β6D1 cell line (rvu: 0.4) (Figure 3). N-cadherin was undetectable in the SCC9β6KDFyn cell line. When grown as an MCS, the SCC9β6KDFyn cell line expressed significant levels of N-cadherin (rvu: 3.0). N-cadherin expression was barely detectable in the SCC9β6D1 cell lines (rvu: 0.25) and no N-cadherin expression was detected in either the SCC9 and SCC9β6 cell lines (Figure 3). This form of “cadherin switching” suggests that the expression of cell-cell adhesion molecules is dynamic and can change depending on the cellular needs.

Differential expression of c-Raf in oral SCC monolayers. The RAF proteins are a family of kinases that serve as an intermediary in the transmission of extracellular signals from growth factor receptors in the RAS-RAF pathway and are important for tumor survival (13). When grown as monolayers, the SCC9β6D1 cell line (rvu: 2.4) expressed three times as much Raf-1 as the SCC9β6KDFyn cell line (rvu: 0.8) and six times as much Raf-1 as the SCC9 and the SCC9β6 cell lines (rvu: 0.4) (Figure 4). When grown as MCS, expression of Raf-1 did not change in the SCC9β6D1 cell line (rvu: 2.5) or in the SCC9 and SCC9β6 cell lines (rvu: 0.4) (Figure 4). However, expression of Raf-1 by the SCC9β6KDFyn cells tripled (rvu: 2.5) when grown as an MCS (Figure 4). These findings suggest that suppression of Fyn (D1 or KD) promotes c-Raf expression in MCS.

Discussion

The 5-year survival rate for oral SCC is approximately 50% and has not improved in over 60 years (1). Recurrence and tissue invasion contribute to the poor prognosis for this disease. To gain a better understanding of this complex disease in vitro, it is important to establish an accurate model that can be related to the in vivo situation. When cells are grown as monolayers, they lose the shape and gene expression that occurs in vivo. In order to address this, we used the more physiological relevant tumor model of multicellular spheroid formation (MCS). The results in this study demonstrate the complexity of tumor cell growth in vivo when tumor cells exist in a three-dimensional organization versus a monolayer situation.

When grown as MCS for 48 hours, the SCC9β6KDFyn cell line formed the largest spheroids followed by SCC9 and SCC9β6 cell lines. The SCCβ6D1 cells present with an epithelial morphology and form cobblestone appearing sheets when grown in monolayers (3). However, SCCβ6D1 cells only form clusters of 2-3 cells under spheroid promoting conditions. This suggested that it is not just inactivation of Fyn that promotes MCS formation but this must be coupled with the full length β6 integrin. We expected E-cadherin to play a role in MCS formed by the SCC9β6KDFyn cells and were surprised when we did not detect E-cadherin in the SCC9β6KDFyn, although the other cell lines expressed strong levels.

N-cadherin plays an important role in tumor cell migration and activates several pathways (i.e. Rho GTPases) and functionσ in tyrosine kinase signaling (14). We evaluated the expression of N-cadherin in the SCC cell lines. The SCC9β6KDFyn cell line was the only line to express N-cadherin when grown as an MCS. This has been reported previously by Shih and Yamada using a model in which Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells are embedded within a collagen matrix. They treated MDCK cells with HGF and induced EMT. They found the mesenchymal appearing cells were aggressive when embedded into collagen and went through an E-cadherin to N-cadherin switching (15).

Previously we showed that the β6 integrin is coupled to the RAF-MAPK pathway by way of Fyn/FAK/Shc (9). This coupling was instrumental in promoting oral SCC EMT. Expression of c-Raf is greatest when Fyn kinase is inactive in the oral SCC cells grown as monolayers or as MCS (SCC9β6KDFyn, SCC9β6D1). Discrete changes that occur when moving from a two-dimensional to a three-dimensional growing situation present a unique opportunity to evaluate growth properties that may not be realized when studying tumor cell growth as a monolayer.

Acknowledgements

The Authors wish to thank the Department of Orofacial Sciences and Dr. Caroline Shiboski for support and to the memory of Dr. Sol Silverman.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Received September 3, 2014.
  • Revision received September 30, 2014.
  • Accepted October 8, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Silverman SJ
    : Oral Cancer. Ontario: BC Decker, 1998.
  2. ↵
    1. Bates RC
    : Colorectal cancer progression: integrin alphavbeta6 and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Cell Cycle 4: 1350-1352, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ramos DM,
    2. Dang D,
    3. Sadler S
    : The role of the integrin alpha v beta6 in regulating the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in oral cancer. Anticancer Res 29: 125-130, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Bankfalvi A,
    2. Krassort M,
    3. Buchwalow IB,
    4. Vegh A,
    5. Felszeghy E,
    6. Piffko J
    : Gains and losses of adhesion molecules (CD44, E-cadherin, and beta-catenin) during oral carcinogenesis and tumor progression. J Pathol 198: 343-351, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Hulit J,
    2. Suyama K,
    3. Chung S,
    4. Rinat K,
    5. Agiostratidou G,
    6. Shan W,
    7. Dong X,
    8. Williams T,
    9. Lisanti M,
    10. Knudsen K,
    11. Hazan R
    : N-cadherin signaling potentiates mammary tumor metastasis via enhanced extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cancer Res 67: 3106-3116, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Tanaka H,
    2. Kono E,
    3. Tran CP,
    4. Miyazaki H,
    5. Yamashiro J,
    6. Shimomura T,
    7. Fazli L,
    8. Wada R,
    9. Huang J,
    10. Vessella RL,
    11. An J,
    12. Horvath S,
    13. Gleave M,
    14. Rettig MB,
    15. Wainberg ZA,
    16. Reiter RE
    : Monoclonal antibody targeting of N-cadherin inhibits prostate cancer growth, metastasis and castration resistance. Nat Med 16: 1414-1420, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Makino T,
    3. Muchemwa FC,
    4. Lin T,
    5. Wakasugi S,
    6. Egawa K,
    7. Ihn H
    : Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases signaling pathway in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Biosci Trends 1: 156-160, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Callans LS,
    2. Naama H,
    3. Khandelwal M,
    4. Plotkin R,
    5. Jardines L
    : Raf-1 protein expression in human breast cancer cells. Ann SurgOncol 2: 38-42, 1995.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Hu Y,
    4. Dang D,
    5. Regezi J,
    6. Schmidt BL,
    7. Atakilit A,
    8. Chen B,
    9. Ellis D,
    10. Ramos DM
    : Alphavbeta6-Fyn signaling promotes oral cancer progression. J BiolChem 278: 41646-41653, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Dang D,
    2. Ramos DM
    : Identification of alphavbeta6-positive stem cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 29: 2043-2049, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Umbas R,
    2. Isaacs WB,
    3. Bringuier PP,
    4. Schaafsma HE,
    5. Karthaus HF,
    6. Oosterhof GO,
    7. Debruyne FM,
    8. Schalken JA
    : Decreased E-cadherin expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer Res 54: 3929-3933, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Islam S,
    2. Carey TE,
    3. Wolf GT,
    4. Wheelock MJ,
    5. Johnson KR
    : Expression of N-cadherin by human squamous carcinoma cells induces a scattered fibroblastic phenotype with disrupted cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Biol 135: 1643-1654, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. McCubrey JA,
    2. Steelman LS,
    3. Chappell WH,
    4. Abrams SL,
    5. Wong EW,
    6. Chang F,
    7. Lehmann B,
    8. Terrian DM,
    9. Milella M,
    10. Tafuri A,
    11. Stivala F,
    12. libra M,
    13. Basecke J,
    14. Evangelisti C,
    15. Martelli AM,
    16. Franlkin RA
    : Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773: 1263-1284, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Li G,
    2. Satyamoorthy K,
    3. Herlyn M
    : N-cadherin-mediated intercellular interactions promote survival and migration of melanoma cells. Cancer Res 61: 3819-3825, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Shih W,
    2. Yamada S
    : N-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion promotes cell migration in a three-dimensional matrix. J Cell Sci 125: 3661-3670, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 34, Issue 12
December 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differential Spheroid Formation by Oral Cancer Cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Differential Spheroid Formation by Oral Cancer Cells
CARLIN LEE, CASEY LEE, AMHA ATAKILIT, AMANDA SIU, DANIEL M. RAMOS
Anticancer Research Dec 2014, 34 (12) 6945-6949;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Differential Spheroid Formation by Oral Cancer Cells
CARLIN LEE, CASEY LEE, AMHA ATAKILIT, AMANDA SIU, DANIEL M. RAMOS
Anticancer Research Dec 2014, 34 (12) 6945-6949;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • {alpha}v{beta}6-Fyn Kinase Promotes Epithelial Phenotype in SYF Cells
  • Multicellular Spheroids as a Model for Hypoxia-induced EMT
  • Regulation of Multicellular Spheroids by MAPK and FYN Kinase
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Musashi1 Enhances Cell Growth and Increases Chemoresistance in Neuroblastoma
  • 6-O-Carboxypropyl-α-Tocotrienol Enhances the Anticancer Effects of Bortezomib Without Suppressing NRF1 and NRF3 in Colorectal Cancer Cells
  • Imbalance Between CD44 and STAT3 Enhances Spheroid Viability and Impairs Pembrolizumab Response in Urothelial Cancer
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • spheroid
  • E-cadherin
  • N-cadherin
  • c-RAF
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire