Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife as a Boost Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer, a Multi-institutional Survey: Impact of Planning Target Volume

HIDEYA YAMAZAKI, MIKIO OGITA, KENGO HIMEI, SATOAKI NAKAMURA, KEN YOSHIDA, TADAYUKI KOTSUMA, YUJI YAMADA, MASATERU FUJIWARA, SUNGJAE BAEK and YASUO YOSHIOKA
Anticancer Research October 2014, 34 (10) 5755-5759;
HIDEYA YAMAZAKI
1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
2CyberKnife Center, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hideya10{at}hotmail.com
MIKIO OGITA
3Radiotherapy Department, Fujimoto Hayasuzu Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENGO HIMEI
4Department of Radiology, Japanese Red cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SATOAKI NAKAMURA
1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEN YOSHIDA
5Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TADAYUKI KOTSUMA
5Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUJI YAMADA
6Department of Radiation Oncology, NTT West Japan Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASATERU FUJIWARA
7Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SUNGJAE BAEK
7Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUO YOSHIOKA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients. The thick line depicts LC rate, thin line depicts PFSrate and dotted line depicts OS rate.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates according to planning target volume (PTV). Patients with PTV ≤20 cm3 (thick line) showed better PFS rate (92%) and OS rate (100%) than patients with PTV >20 cm3 (dotted line) (61%, p=0.027 and 47% p=0.015, respectively).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table I.
  • Table II.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 34, Issue 10
October 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife as a Boost Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer, a Multi-institutional Survey: Impact of Planning Target Volume
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife as a Boost Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer, a Multi-institutional Survey: Impact of Planning Target Volume
HIDEYA YAMAZAKI, MIKIO OGITA, KENGO HIMEI, SATOAKI NAKAMURA, KEN YOSHIDA, TADAYUKI KOTSUMA, YUJI YAMADA, MASATERU FUJIWARA, SUNGJAE BAEK, YASUO YOSHIOKA
Anticancer Research Oct 2014, 34 (10) 5755-5759;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife as a Boost Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer, a Multi-institutional Survey: Impact of Planning Target Volume
HIDEYA YAMAZAKI, MIKIO OGITA, KENGO HIMEI, SATOAKI NAKAMURA, KEN YOSHIDA, TADAYUKI KOTSUMA, YUJI YAMADA, MASATERU FUJIWARA, SUNGJAE BAEK, YASUO YOSHIOKA
Anticancer Research Oct 2014, 34 (10) 5755-5759;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimizing Biopsy Decisions in PI-RADS 3-4 Lesions: Integrating PSA-derived Biomarkers to Reduce Unnecessary Procedures
  • Surgical Outcomes and Postoperative Changes in Nutritional Indexes and Sarcopenia Markers in Oldest-old Patients With Resected Biliary Tract Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Effect of Tissue Sample Type on The Evaluation of PD-L1 (SP142) Expression in Breast Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Head and neck cancer
  • stereotactic radiotherapy
  • CyberKnife
  • boost therapy
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire