Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Obesity is a Risk Factor for Multifocal Disease and Recurrence after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Case-Control Study

MARCO SCARPA, CESARE RUFFOLO, FRANCESCA ERROI, ALAIN FIOROT, SILVIA BASATO, ANNA POZZA, FABIO CANAL, MARCO MASSANI, FRANCESCO CAVALLIN, MICHELE ANTONIUTTI, NICOLÒ BASSI and CARLO CASTORO
Anticancer Research October 2014, 34 (10) 5735-5741;
MARCO SCARPA
1Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV-IRCCS), Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: marcoscarpa73{at}yahoo.it
CESARE RUFFOLO
2Second Department of Surgery (Unit IV), Cà Foncello Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FRANCESCA ERROI
3Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALAIN FIOROT
2Second Department of Surgery (Unit IV), Cà Foncello Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SILVIA BASATO
3Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNA POZZA
3Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FABIO CANAL
4Pathology Unit, Cà Foncello Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARCO MASSANI
2Second Department of Surgery (Unit IV), Cà Foncello Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FRANCESCO CAVALLIN
1Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV-IRCCS), Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHELE ANTONIUTTI
2Second Department of Surgery (Unit IV), Cà Foncello Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NICOLÒ BASSI
2Second Department of Surgery (Unit IV), Cà Foncello Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CARLO CASTORO
1Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV-IRCCS), Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Several studies have demonstrated that obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), but few data are available regarding its role in multifocal disease and postoperative recurrence. The present study aimed to assess the role of obesity as a risk factor for multifocal disease and postoperative recurrence in patients with CRC. Patients and Methods: The records of 940 consecutive patients with CRC admitted to three surgical centres between January 2006 and January 2011 were retrospectively analysed. The 595 individuals whose preoperative body mass index (BMI) values were available were included in the study. Following WHO guidelines, the patients were stratified into four groups depending on their BMI values. Age at disease onset, clinical presentation, tumor invasiveness, the presence of multiple foci, and the colon cancer recurrence rate in the four groups were assessed and compared. Results: At multivariate analysis, diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and a BMI>30 were found to be independent predictors of synchronous polyps (Odd Ratio [OR]=10.7, 95% Confidence interval (CI)=2-75, p=0.005; and OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.3-3.9, p=0.003, respectively). The cancer recurrence rate in the patients with stage 2 CRC was significantly higher in the obese with respect to the non-obese (p=0.05). At multivariate analysis, BMI>30, FAP, and positivity by the Bethesda criteria were found to be independent predictors of recurrence after CRC surgery. Conclusion: Obese patients diagnosed with CRC require thorough colonic exploration prior to surgery and necessitate more frequent postoperative endoscopic examinations with respect to patients without any risk factors.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • adenoma
  • obesity
  • Bethesda criteria

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death among American adults and in Western countries (1), and a rapid increase in CRC morbidity has also been observed over recent decades, especially in rapidly developing countries such as China, characterized by significant diet and lifestyle changes (2). Several meta-analyses have consistently reported that adult obesity is specifically associated with an increased risk of colonic cancer (3-6), and metabolic syndrome has also been found to be associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and mortality in both sexes (7). According to a review/meta-analysis examining the association between CRC with metabolic syndrome and its components, risk estimates were significant for each single factor (higher body mass index (BMI)/waist, dysglycemia, and higher blood pressure) (7). Although the etiology of CRC is not completely understood, several studies have demonstrated that lifestyle choices, such as smoking, higher consumption of red meat, low consumption of vegetables and fruit, low levels of physical activity, high-fat/low-fiber diets may be contributing factors (8-10). The fact that the prevalence of overweight/obesity, and with it, the risk of mortality from cancer, continues to increase in most parts of the world (including the Asia-Pacific region) is clearly indicative of the need for strategies to prevent obesity and for screening for cancer (11).

Several mechanisms have been implicated in the association between obesity and CRC onset. For one, obesity is characterized by high leptin levels. Leptin can induce preneoplastic colon is epithelial cells to orchestrate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-driven angiogenesis (12), and in males, high leptin concentrations seem to be associated with an increased risk of colonic adenoma (13). Leptin receptor polymorphisms have been associated with an increased risk for CRC and this association seems to be strengthened by cigarette smoking and family history of cancer (14). For another, while adiponectin has been reported to have anti-carcinogenic properties, its levels are lower in obese patients and its receptors seem to be intimately related to CRC progression (15).

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Lynch or hereditary non polyposis colonic cancer syndrome (HNPCC), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and smoking are the best-characterized risk factors for multifocal disease and CRC recurrence. FAP is by definition multifocal and the cumulative risk of pouch adenoma after restorative proctocolectomy is 20% after eight years (16). Small adenomas are common occurrences and frequently missed in patients with HNPCC syndrome (17). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend more frequent (i.e. annual) post-treatment colonoscopies in these patients (18). Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are at higher risk of CRC. Polypoid dysplasia can be classified as within (adenoma-like dysplasia) or outside (sporadic adenoma) the most proximal endoscopic or histological extent of colitis. According to a recent study, following polypectomy, the 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer or flat dysplasia was 13% (19), and the cumulative risk of pouch dysplasia after restorative proctocolectomy for UC was approximately 3-4% (20). Finally, the findings that the association between cigarette smoking and colorectal polyp risk is modified by tobacco carcinogen-metabolizing polymorphisms (21) and that the association between smoking and adenoma recurrence is significant after a long exposure (22) provide support for a causal role of cigarette smoking in the etiology of colorectal tumors.

The study's aim was to assess obesity as a risk factor for multifocal disease and post-treatment CRC recurrence in obese patients who underwent surgery for CRC.

Patients and Methods

Study design. This retrospective case–control study was carried-out in accordance with the principles of the amended Helsinki Declaration, and all potential participants were asked to give their written permission for the investigators to collect and review their hospital records. The records of 940 consecutive patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma admitted to three surgical centers (Second Department of Surgery, Cà Foncello Regional Hospital, Treviso; Department of Surgical and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova; Oncological Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padova) between January 2006 and January 2011 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Patients' weight, height, and BMI were measured/calculated, and their healthy weight and BMI values at diagnosis were retrieved from their clinical records. Only those whose BMI values at diagnosis were available were included in the study.

Following the WHO guidelines, the patients were stratified into four groups on the basis of their BMI values before disease onset: patients whose BMI was over 30 were considered obese, those whose BMI was between 25 and 29.9 were considered overweight, those whose BMI was lower than 25 were considered normal weight, and those with BMI lower than 20.9 were considered underweight. The patients' demographic and oncological features, the presence of multifocal disease, and recurrence rate of the four groups were compared.

Surgical technique. The surgical approach was the same in all three groups. Colonic resection consisted in the complete removal of the primary cancer ensuring adequate tumor-free margins, complete anatomic lymphadenectomy (at least 12 lymph nodes) and, wherever possible, en bloc resection extending to any involved adjacent organs. Total mesorectal excision with removal of the mesorectum and all lymph nodes within an oncological package was the standard treatment for all the patients. Patients with tumors located in the middle or upper rectum underwent an anterior or low anterior resection with preservation of the anal sphincter, while patients with distal tumors underwent complete abdominoperineal resection of the rectum with a permanent colostomy. Both conventional open surgery with median laparotomy and video laparoscopic approaches were performed in all three surgical units involved in this study.

Follow-up protocol. The follow-up protocol adopted by all three participating centers was designed in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines (23). Briefly, our protocol recommended yearly computed tomography (CT) scans, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing every three months, and an evaluation by both the surgeon and oncologist every six months for the first two years and once a year thereafter for the following five years. Colonoscopies were to be performed one and three years after surgery and, if these were negative, every five years thereafter. Patients with high-risk hereditary CRC syndromes or those with rectal cancer had yearly colonoscopy. Patients who did not come to their outpatient appointments were contacted personally or through their family physician. All patients received a minimum follow-up of six months.

Statistical analysis. Data are expressed as medians (interquartile range-IQR-) or numbers (percentage of patients). Univariate analyses were performed using the Chi-squared test for qualitative variables and Kruskall–Wallis ANOVA or Mann–Whitney U-test for quantitative variables, as appropriate. Known risk factors (FAP diagnosis, positivity by the Bethesda criteria for HNPCC diagnosis (24), Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) diagnosis, active smoking and BMI>30) were included in logistic regression analysis models to identify independent predictors of multifocal disease. Cox proportional hazard regression models with the same potential predictors were used to analyze CRC recurrence stratified according to stage. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p≤0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with STATISTICA 5.1 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).

Results

Characteristics of excluded patients. Five hundred and ninety-five individuals who underwent colorectal resection and whose BMI values at diagnosis were available were included in the study. BMI values were not available in 342 cases because height was not always registered in patients' medical records. As shown in Table I, the demographic and oncological characteristics at baseline of the excluded and included patients were similar.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

Characteristics of the included patients. Seventy-five of the 595 patients were classified as obese (BMI>30), 226 were classified as overweight (BMI=25-29.9), 249 were classified as normal weight (BMI<24.9), and 45 were classified as underweight (BMI<20). No statistically significant difference was observed in the four groups in terms of age at disease onset, cancer stage, cancer localization, serum levels of CEA, cancer antigen 125 (CA125), cytokeratin 18 (CK18) and CA19.9, the Bethesda criteria for HNPCC diagnosis, FAP diagnosis, or active smoking habits. The obese patients were more frequently male, had significantly higher serum CA15.3 levels, and more frequently self-reported a history of smoking. Obese patients tended to have a higher American Society Anesthesiologists score. Some symptoms and features, such as abdominal pain, weight loss and abdominal mass, were significantly more frequent in the underweight patients. Underweight patients more frequently reported history of IBD. There was a significantly more frequent history of previous CRC and more frequent family history of CRC or HNPCC syndrome-related cancer in the underweight patients. The Signet ring cell histotype was, moreover, more frequent in the underweight patients. No statistically significant differences were found in the four groups in terms of age at disease onset. When the patients were stratified according to gender, age at disease onset was significantly lower in the underweight and obese male patients (p=0.03). Characteristics of patients included are outlined in Table II.

Multifocal disease. One hundred and sixteen (19.4%) of the patients studied had synchronous polyps and 20 (3.4%) had synchronous CRC. The obese patients had a significantly higher frequency of synchronous colon polyps (p=0.007). They also had a higher frequency, although not significantly, of synchronous CRC. At multiple logistic regression analysis, FAP diagnosis and a BMI>30 were independent predictors of synchronous polyps (OR=10.7, 95% CI=2-75, p=0.005 and OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.3-3.9, p=0.003, respectively), while IBD, at least one positive Bethesda criterion, and active smoking did not seem to be implicated in multifocal disease. The relationship between the presence of synchronous colonic lesions and obesity is outlined in Figure 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Characteristics of patients stratified into four groups based on body mass index (BMI.)

Colonic recurrence of CRC. The overall and disease-free survival rate of the 595 patients who underwent colonic resection for CRC did not seem to be correlated to BMI status even when the patients were stratified by stage and BMI class. Colonic recurrence in the patients with stage 2 CRC was, however, significantly higher in the obese with respect to their non-obese counterparts (p=0.05). Colonic recurrence in patients with stage 3 disease also tended to be more frequent in the obese with respect to the non-obese patients (p=0.08). At multivariate analysis, BMI>30, FAP, and positivity by Bethesda criteria were independent predictors of colonic recurrence after CRC resection. The relationship between cancer recurrence and obesity is outlined in Figure 2.

Discussion

A vast, highly authoritative twin study examining the overall contribution of inherited genes to the development of malignant diseases concluded that the environment has the principal role in causing sporadic cancer (25). Higher BMI, red meat consumption, cigarette smoking, low levels of physical activity and of vegetable/fruit consumption have all been found to be associated with a moderately increased risk of CRC (10). While several meta-analyses have consistently reported that adult obesity is associated with an increased risk of colonic cancer (3-6), few studies have examined how obesity affects multifocal disease, CRC recurrence, and survival (26). The aim of the present study was to assess the role of obesity as a risk factor for multifocal disease and to evaluate and compare postoperative cancer recurrence in obese and non-obese patients who have undergone surgery for CRC.

The incidence of obese patients with CRC in the population studied was slightly higher than 9.4%, which is the incidence of obesity in the general population of adults over 18 living in the Veneto region in 2009 (27). The incidence of obese patients with CRC over the age of 45 years, which was between 11.9% and 40%, was likewise similar to the incidence of obesity in the general regional population.

One study carried-out at the Chicago University Hospital detected synchronous polyps in 29.8% of patients with CRC (28), and another performed at the Aristotle University in Greece found them in 23.5% (29). While 19.4% of our entire CRC population had synchronous polyps, over 30% of the obese patients did. The obese patients had, in fact, a significantly higher frequency of synchronous polyps, as well as a higher frequency (but not significantly) of synchronous CRC. According to multivariate analysis, FAP diagnosis and a BMI>30 were the only independent predictors of the presence of synchronous adenomatous polyps.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Obesity is associated with multiple disease foci.

A recent systematic review concluded that obesity and overweight are significant risk factors for colorectal adenomas (30), and according to a large Korean study, even in the absence of a metabolically unhealthy state, excess body weight is positively associated with an increased presence of colorectal adenomas (31). According to large, authoritative Dutch study, a BMI over 25 increased the risk of colorectal adenomas in male adults with HNPCC diagnosis (32), but little information is available concerning synchronous adenomas in the presence of CRC and obesity.

The recurrence rate of colonic cancer in our patients with stage 2 CRC was significantly higher in the obese compared to the non-obese patients. While in patients with stage 3 disease, the recurrence rate might have been affected by postoperative chemotherapy, this was not the case in the obese patients with stage 2 disease who did not undergo any adjuvant therapy. This consideration might explain why recurrence only tended to be more frequent in the obese patients with stage 3 colon cancer compared to the non-obese ones, with a marginal statistically significant difference.

At multivariate analysis, FAP and positivity by Bethesda criteria were found to be independent predictors of CRC recurrence after CRC resection, while a BMI over 30 was a weak independent predictor. Literature data seem to confirm these findings. In fact, according to the investigators of a large study carried out at the Howard University of Washington, obesity was associated with an increased risk of adenoma recurrence (33), and a recent meta-analysis concluded that there may be an association between high BMI and body fat at the time of diagnosis, with a high CRC-specific recurrence rate (26).

These data suggest that obesity has an independent role in the multifocality of carcinogenesis pathways that could be ascribed to the hormonal effect of leptin (13). According to a recent Irish study, in fact, the metabolic syndrome and plasma leptin were found to be associated with a more aggressive CRC phenotype in male patients (34). Obesity is then another factor that should be taken into consideration when the surgical procedure is being planned: a thorough evaluation of the entire colon is necessary in the obese patient because the surgical procedure may need to be more extensive than that dictated by the primary cancer (28). Prospective studies are, moreover, warranted to establish the most appropriate postoperative surveillance timetable: follow-up appointments may be less frequent than those adopted in the case of patients with HNPCC, but more frequent than those for patients without any risk factors. These considerations are particularly important in view of the fact that the ASCO guidelines do not consider obese patients to be at particular risk (23).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Colonic recurrence in stage II is influenced by BMI >30.

In conclusion, our study findings suggest that obesity plays an independent role in the multifocality of carcinogenesis. In practical terms, this means that obese patients diagnosed with CRC require thorough colonic exploration prior to surgery and necessitate more frequent postoperative endoscopic examinations with respect to patients without any risk factors. Further large-scale studies are, of course, warranted.

Acknowledgements

The Authors are extremely grateful to Ms Linda Inverso for her kind help in the final editing of the manuscript.

This study was partially funded by Current Research Funds from the Italian Ministry of Health to Carlo Castoro.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    None.

  • Received May 29, 2014.
  • Revision received July 11, 2014.
  • Accepted July 14, 2014.
  • Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Ward E
    : Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60: 277-300, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Sung JJ,
    2. Lau JY,
    3. Goh KL,
    4. Leung WK
    : Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: implications for screening. Lancet Oncol 6: 871-876, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Renehan AG,
    2. Tyson M,
    3. Egger M,
    4. Heller RF,
    5. Zwahlen M
    : Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 371: 569-578, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Moghaddam AA,
    2. Woodward M,
    3. Huxley R
    : Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16: 2533-2547, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Larsson SC,
    2. Wolk A
    : Obesity and colon and rectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr 86: 556-565, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Ma Y,
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Wang F,
    4. Zhang P,
    5. Shi C,
    6. Zou Y,
    7. Qin H
    : Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. PLoS One 8(1): e53916, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Esposito K,
    2. Chiodini P,
    3. Capuano A,
    4. Bellastella G,
    5. Maiorino MI,
    6. Rafaniello C,
    7. Panagiotakos DB,
    8. Giugliano D
    : Colorectal cancer association with metabolic syndrome and its components: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Endocrine 44(3): 634-647, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bianchini F,
    2. Kaaks R,
    3. Vainio H
    : Overweight, obesity, and cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 3: 565-574, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Terry P,
    2. Giovannucci E,
    3. Michels KB,
    4. Bergkvist L,
    5. Hansen H,
    6. et al
    : Fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, and risk of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 525-533, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Johnson CM,
    2. Wei C,
    3. Ensor JE,
    4. Smolenski DJ,
    5. Amos CI,
    6. Levin B,
    7. Berry DA
    : Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors. Cancer Causes Control 24(6): 1207-1222, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Parr CL,
    2. Batty GD,
    3. Lam TH,
    4. Barzi F,
    5. Fang X,
    6. Ho SC,
    7. Jee SH,
    8. Ansary-Moghaddam A,
    9. Jamrozik K,
    10. Ueshima H,
    11. Woodward M,
    12. Huxley RR,
    13. on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration
    : Bodymass index and cancer mortality in the Asia-Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration: pooled analyses of 424,519 participants. Lancet Oncol 11: 741-752, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Birmingham JM,
    2. Busik JV,
    3. Hansen-Smith FM,
    4. Fenton JI
    : Novel mechanism for obesity-induced colon cancer progression. Carcinogenesis 30(4): 690-697, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Chia VM,
    2. Newcomb PA,
    3. Lampe JW,
    4. White E,
    5. Mandelson MT,
    6. McTiernan A,
    7. Potter JD
    : Leptin concentrations, leptin receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal adenoma risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16(12): 2697-2703, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Liu L,
    2. Zhong R,
    3. Wei S,
    4. Xiang H,
    5. Chen J,
    6. Xie D,
    7. Yin J,
    8. Zou L,
    9. Sun J,
    10. Wei C,
    11. Miao X,
    12. Nie S
    : The leptin gene family and colorectal cancer: interaction with smoking behavior and family history of cancer. PLoS ONE 8(4): e60777, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Byeon JS,
    2. Jeong JY,
    3. Kim MJ,
    4. Lee SM,
    5. Nam WH,
    6. Myung SJ,
    7. Kim JG,
    8. Yang SK,
    9. Kim JH,
    10. Suh DJ
    : Adiponectin and adiponectin receptor in relation to colorectal cancer progression. Int J Cancer 127: 2758-2767, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Polese L,
    2. Keighley MR
    : Adenomas at resections margins do not influence the long term development of pouch polyps after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Am J Surg 186(1): 32-34, 2003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Stoffel EM,
    2. Turgeon DK,
    3. Stockwell DH,
    4. Zhao L,
    5. Normolle DP,
    6. Tuck MK,
    7. Bresalier RS,
    8. Marcon NE,
    9. Baron JA,
    10. Ruffin MT,
    11. Brenner DE,
    12. Syngal S
    : Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 1(6): 470-475, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    NCCN Practice Guidelines In Oncology v1.2010. www.nccn.org.
  16. ↵
    1. Kisiel JB (1).,
    2. Loftus EV Jr..,
    3. Harmsen WS,
    4. Zinsmeister AR,
    5. Sandborn WJ
    : Outcome of sporadic adenomas and adenoma-like dysplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing polypectomy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18(2): 226-235, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Scarpa M,
    2. van Koperen PJ,
    3. Ubbink DT,
    4. Hommes DW,
    5. ten Kate FJW,
    6. Bemelman WA
    : A systematic review for dysplasia after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 94(5): 534-545, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Fu Z,
    2. Shrubsole MJ,
    3. Li G,
    4. Smalley WE,
    5. Hein DW,
    6. Cai Q,
    7. Ness RM,
    8. Zheng W
    : Interaction of cigarette smoking and carcinogen-metabolizing polymorphisms in the risk of colorectal polyps. Carcinogenesis 34(4): 779-86, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Reid ME (1).,
    2. Marshall JR,
    3. Roe D,
    4. Lebowitz M,
    5. Alberts D,
    6. Battacharyya AK,
    7. Martinez ME
    : Smoking exposure as a risk factor for prevalent and recurrent colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12(10): 1006-11, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    http://www.cancer.net/publications-and-resources/what-know-ascos-guidelines/what-know-ascos-guideline-follow-care-colorectal-cancer/recommendations
  21. ↵
    1. Umar A,
    2. Boland CR,
    3. Terdiman JP,
    4. et al
    : Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 96 261-268, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Lichtenstein P,
    2. Holm NV,
    3. Verkasalo PK,
    4. Iliadou A,
    5. Kaprio J,
    6. Koskenvuo M,
    7. Pukkala E,
    8. Skytthe A,
    9. Hemminki K
    : Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 13;343(2): 78-85, 2000.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Vrieling A,
    2. Kampman E
    : The role of body mass index, physical activity, and diet in colorectal cancer recurrence and survival: a review of the literature. Am J Clin Nutr 92(3): 471-490, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. SISTEMA STATISTICO NAZIONALE – ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI STATISTICA
    : Indagine multiscopo annuale sulle famiglie “Aspetti della vita quotidiana” Anno 2009. ISTAT 2010.
  25. ↵
    1. Arenas RB,
    2. Fichera A,
    3. Mhoon D,
    4. Michelassi F
    : Incidence and therapeutic implications of synchronous colonic pathology in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 122(4): 706-709, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Demetriades H,
    2. Kanellos I,
    3. Blouhos K,
    4. Tsachalis T,
    5. Vasiliadis K,
    6. Pramateftakis MG,
    7. Betsis D
    : Synchronous polyps in patients with colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1): s72-5, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Omata F,
    2. Deshpande GA,
    3. Ohde S,
    4. Mine T,
    5. Fukui T
    : The association between obesity and colorectal adenoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 48(2): 136-46, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Yun KE,
    2. Chang Y,
    3. Jung HS,
    4. Kim CW,
    5. Kwon MJ,
    6. Park SK,
    7. Sung E,
    8. Shin H,
    9. Park HS,
    10. Ryu S
    : Impact of body mass index on the risk of colorectal adenoma in a metabolically healthy population. Cancer Res 1;73(13): 4020-4027, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Botma A,
    2. Nagengast FM,
    3. Braem MGM,
    4. Hendriks JCM,
    5. Kleibeuker JH,
    6. Vasen HFA,
    7. Kampman E
    : Body Mass index increases risk of colorectal adenomas in men with Lynch syndrome: The GEOLynch Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 28: 4346-4353, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Laiyemo AO,
    2. Doubeni C,
    3. Badurdeen DS,
    4. Murphy G,
    5. Marcus PM,
    6. Schoen RE,
    7. Lanza E,
    8. Smoot DT,
    9. Cross AJ
    : Obesity, weight change, and risk of adenoma recurrence: a prospective trial. Endoscopy 44(9): 813-818, 2012 .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Healy LA,
    2. Howard JM,
    3. Ryan AM,
    4. Beddy P,
    5. Mehigan B,
    6. Stephens R,
    7. Reynolds JV
    : Metabolic syndrome and leptin are associated with adverse pathological features in male colorectal cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 14(2): 157-165, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 34, Issue 10
October 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Obesity is a Risk Factor for Multifocal Disease and Recurrence after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Case-Control Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Obesity is a Risk Factor for Multifocal Disease and Recurrence after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Case-Control Study
MARCO SCARPA, CESARE RUFFOLO, FRANCESCA ERROI, ALAIN FIOROT, SILVIA BASATO, ANNA POZZA, FABIO CANAL, MARCO MASSANI, FRANCESCO CAVALLIN, MICHELE ANTONIUTTI, NICOLÒ BASSI, CARLO CASTORO
Anticancer Research Oct 2014, 34 (10) 5735-5741;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Obesity is a Risk Factor for Multifocal Disease and Recurrence after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Case-Control Study
MARCO SCARPA, CESARE RUFFOLO, FRANCESCA ERROI, ALAIN FIOROT, SILVIA BASATO, ANNA POZZA, FABIO CANAL, MARCO MASSANI, FRANCESCO CAVALLIN, MICHELE ANTONIUTTI, NICOLÒ BASSI, CARLO CASTORO
Anticancer Research Oct 2014, 34 (10) 5735-5741;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Comparing long-term prognosis following different surgical methods in patients with early stage breast cancer and obesity: a retrospective cohort study in China
  • AACR Cancer Progress Report 2015
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Risk Factors for Hyperglycemia Associated With Anamorelin Administration
  • Identification of Risk Factors for the Local Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-radiofrequency Ablation
  • Practical Implementation and Validation of Geriatric Assessment in Older Adults With Esophageal Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • colorectal cancer
  • adenoma
  • Obesity
  • Bethesda criteria
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire