Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Impact of Chemotherapy with S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) in Combination with Molecular-targeting Agents on Colorectal Liver Metastases

KAZUHIRO WATANABE, HIDEJIRO KAWAHARA, HIROYA ENOMOTO, YOICHI TOYAMA, TADASHI AKIBA and KATSUHIKO YANAGA
Anticancer Research September 2013, 33 (9) 3941-3946;
KAZUHIRO WATANABE
1Department of Surgery, Kashiwa Hospital, Jikei University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEJIRO KAWAHARA
1Department of Surgery, Kashiwa Hospital, Jikei University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kawahide{at}jikei.ac.jp
HIROYA ENOMOTO
1Department of Surgery, Kashiwa Hospital, Jikei University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOICHI TOYAMA
1Department of Surgery, Kashiwa Hospital, Jikei University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TADASHI AKIBA
1Department of Surgery, Kashiwa Hospital, Jikei University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KATSUHIKO YANAGA
2Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy with molecular-targeting agents on liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Six patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases who underwent hepatectomy after chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) between January 2010 and December 2011 at the Department of Surgery, Kashiwa Hospital, the Jikei University School of Medicine were enrolled. Two patients received only SOX as chemotherapy, while the others received SOX in combination with one of the three molecular-targeting agents, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab. Results: In the two patients who received SOX alone, liver metastases completely disappeared at more than six months after starting chemotherapy as shown by computed tomographic (CT) scan. However, malignant cells were diffusely detected by pathological examination at the site of liver metastases, as detected by CT scan before chemotherapy. In the other four patients who received SOX in combination with molecular targets, the size of liver metastases appeared unchanged at three months after limited chemotherapy by CT scan. Pathologically, few malignant cells were detected, only at the borderline of the tumor, while most tumor cells inside the tumor were necrotized and been replaced by fibroconnective tissue. Conclusion: Molecular-targeting agents may induce tumor necrosis rapidly from inside the tumor, which might not be detected by CT scan before surgery.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • oxaliplatin
  • S-1
  • SOX
  • molecular target
  • liver metastasis

Recently, more efficient chemotherapy regimens and molecular targets have opened new perspectives in the treatment of both resectable and non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. 5-Fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX6) has been the standard systemic regimen in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (1-3). However, infusional 5-FU with FA has the disadvantages of increased inconvenience, cost, and morbidity related to the use of a portable infusion pump and a central venous catheter. Oral fluoropyrimidine derivatives have been developed to circumvent the problems associated with continuous infusion of 5-FU. S-1 (Taiho Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) combines tegafur with two modulators, gineracil and oteracil potassium, of 5-FU metabolism is effective derivatives in Japan. In Japan, a phase I/II study of oxaliplatin plus oral S-1 (SOX) showed promising efficacy with good tolerability in patients with colorectal metastases (4). However, the impact of SOX plus molecular targets on colorectal liver metastases remains unknown.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy with molecular-targeting agents on liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients. Six patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases who underwent hepatectomy after SOX chemotherapy between January 2010 and December 2011 at the Department of Surgery, Kashiwa Hospital, the Jikei University School of Medicine were enrolled. As shown in Table I, two patients received only SOX as chemotherapy, while the others received SOX in combination with one of the three molecular targets, one with bevacizumab, one with cetuximab, and two with panitumumab; these patients had Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild-type colorectal adenocarcinoma. Patients had sufficient oral intake, no prior treatment except for surgery, and were aged between 20 and 80 years. Patients also had to have adequate organ function (4,000 ≤leukocytes <12,000/mm3; thrombocytes ≥100,000/mm3; total bilirubin ≤1.5 mg/dl; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <100 IU/l; creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dl). After curative resection of the primary lesion, so-called R0 operation, as defined in the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma (5), chemotherapy was initiated one month after the surgery.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

In two patients (case 1 and 2) who received chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) alone, liver metastases completely disappeared after over six months chemotherapy as seen by computed tomographic (CT) scan.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of the patients

Treatment schedule 1 (SOX alone). Oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 was administered as a 2-h infusion on the first day in every three weeks. S-1 was available in capsule form containing 20 or 25 mg of tegafur. Patients received S-1 orally twice daily from the morning of day 2 to the evening of day 15 at a dose of 80 mg the body surface area (BSA) <1.5 m2 or 100 mg (BSA ≥1.5 m2) followed by a 6-day rest period in the 3-weekly schedule. We have reported that this dose of S-1 was safe and feasible as monotherapy (6). All patients received pre-medication with a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3-receptor antagonist with or without dexamethasone, given as a 30 min drip infusion before chemotherapy. Treatment was routinely given on an outpatient basis. Subsequent treatment was withheld until the neutrophil and platelet counts were greater than 3,000 and 75,000/ml, respectively, AST or ALT less than 150 IU/l, total bilirubin (T.Bil) less than 1.5-times the upper limit of normal, creatinine less than the upper limit of normal, and diarrhea, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome had resolved to grade 0 or 1. Treatment was repeated until the onset of disease progression or the appearance of severe toxicity. When the administration of oxaliplatin was discontinued due to oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, S-1 was also discontinued.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Tumor cells were detected diffusely by pathological examination at the site of liver metastasis which was detected by computed tomographic (CT) scan before chemotherapy (Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×100).

Treatment schedule 2 (SOX plus molecular targets). All four patients had KRAS wild-type colorectal adenocarcinoma with synchronous liver metastases. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of four courses (for three months) of oxaliplatin with oral S-1 plus one of the three molecular targerts, either of the three molecular targets, bevacizumab at 7.5 mg/kg, cetuximab at 400 mg/m2 or panitumumab at 6 mg/kg, were administered as a 1-h infusion following administration of oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion on the first day in every three weeks. Patients received S-1 orally twice daily from the morning of day 2 to the evening of day 15 at a dose of 80 mg (BSA <1.5 m2) or 100 mg (BSA ≥1.5 m2), followed by a 6-day rest period in the 3-weekly schedule. All patients received pre-medication with a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3-receptor antagonist with or without dexamethasone, given as a 30 min drip infusion before chemotherapy. Treatment was routinely given on an outpatient basis.

Toxicity and response criteria. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) (7). Neurotoxicity was assessed according to the following specific neurotoxicity grading scale: grade 1, dysesthesia or paresthesia that completely regressed within six days; grade 2, dysesthesia or paresthesia persisting for seven days or longer; and grade 3, dysesthesia or paresthesia causing functional impairment. During the study, all patients were evaluated every three weeks for signs and symptoms of toxicity. Complete blood cell counts, including differential count, liver function tests, measurement of serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, and electrolyte levels, and urinalysis were performed every three weeks. The response of measurable and assessable disease sites was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (8). Tumor dimensions were assessed by computed tomographic (CT) scanning every month to confirm response, and every two months after RECIST efficacy was confirmed.

Results

Characteristics of the patients (Table I). The median patient age was 64 years (range=56-74 years), and patients were male. Two (case 1 and 2) of the patients received only SOX as chemotherapy while the other four patients (cases 3-6) received SOX in combination with one of the three molecular targets, one with bevacizumab (case 3), one with cetuximab (case 4), and two with panitumumab (case 5 and 6).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

In the four patients (cases 3-6) who received chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) in combination with one of the three molecular-targeting agents, in computed tomographic (CT) scan the size of liver metastases appeared unchanged after three months of chemotherapy.

Treatment discontinuation under adverse reactions did not occur in this study.

Response to therapy with SOX alone. In the two patients (case 1 and 2) who received SOX alone, liver metastases completely disappeared more than six months after chemotherapy, as shown by CT scan (Figure 1). All such lesions were detected macroscopically in the resected specimens. Furthermore, malignant cells were diffusely detected by pathological examination at the sites of the liver, as detected by CT scan before chemotherapy (Figure 2).

Response to therapy with SOX in combination with molecular-targeting agents. In the other four patients (cases 3-6) who received SOX in combination with one of the three molecular targets, the size of the liver metastases appeared unchanged by CT scan after three months of limited chemotherapy (Figure 3). The metastatic lesions demonstrated a mosaic pattern, and peripheral rim enhancement was shown at the margin of the tumors before chemotherapy (Figure 3). After chemotherapy, the metastatic lesions changed from a mosaic pattern to a cystic pattern, and peripheral rim enhancement at the border of the tumors disappeared on imaging (Figure 3). In the resected specimens, a few malignant cells were detected only at the margin of the tumor, and the central tumor cells had undergone almost total necrosis and replacement by fibroconnective tissue (Figure 4).

Discussion

The efficacy of SOX was superior to that reported for each drug as monotherapy (9, 10), with a response rate of 14/28 (50%), median progression-free survival of 193 days, and a 1-year survival rate of 22/28 (78.6%) (4). The results suggest that tri-weekly treatment with the SOX regimen is an adequate substitute for FOLFOX and can be administered more readily since it does not require central vein access. Recently, more efficient chemotherapy regimens, SOX with molecular targeting agents, have opened new perspectives in the treatment of both resectable and non-resectable colorectal liver metastases (11-15). However, the impact of these regimens on liver metastases from colorectal cancer remains unknown.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

A few malignant cells were detected only at the border of the tumor, and at the center of the tumor cells had undergone almost complete necrosis and were replaced by fibroconnective tissue (Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×100).

In our present study, diffuse liver metastasis in the patients who received SOX alone required a long time for reduction or complete disappearance on imaging, usually over six months. Although the lesions had achieved complete response on imaging, the metastatic lesions had not achieved complete response pathologically. On the other hand, in patients who received SOX in combination with one of the three molecular-targeting agents, a few malignant cells remained only at the border of the tumor, after only three months of limited chemotherapy. Molecular-targeting agents may induce tumor necrosis rapidly from the inside of the tumor. However, this effect could not be evaluated accurately by CT scan before surgery.

CT scan is used to monitor chemotherapy according to the RECIST criteria (7). Complete response is usually defined as the disappearance of target lesions on imaging and is considered as a good indicator of the efficacy of chemotherapy. However, the correlation between imaging and pathological status is not well-defined (16). Optimal morphological response was defined as a change in metastases from lesions with heterogeneous attenuation and thick irregular borders into bland homogeneous and hypodense masses with sharp interface between the tumor and adjacent normal liver parenchyma, which mimic a cyst (17).

In our study, after chemotherapy with molecular-targeting agents, the metastatic lesions changed from a mosaic pattern to a cystic pattern inside the tumor and peripheral rim enhancement at border of the tumors disappeared on imaging. The lack of malignant cells, tumor necrosis and replacement with fibroconnective tissue may be defined as a nearly complete response although there was no change in the size of metastatic lesions between pre- and post-chemotherapy on imaging. However, such concepts need to be verified by large-scale studies and long-term observation.

Conclusion

Molecular-targeting agents may induce tumor necrosis rapidly from inside the tumor. Such an effect cannot be evaluated accurately by CT scan before surgery.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

  • Received July 2, 2013.
  • Revision received July 20, 2013.
  • Accepted July 22, 2013.
  • Copyright© 2013 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. de Gramont A,
    2. Figer A,
    3. Seymour M,
    4. Homerin M,
    5. Hmissi A,
    6. Cassidy J,
    7. Boni C,
    8. Cortes-Funes H,
    9. Cervantes A,
    10. Freyer G,
    11. Papamichael D,
    12. Le Bail N,
    13. Louvet C,
    14. Hendler D,
    15. de Braud F,
    16. Wilson C,
    17. Morvan F,
    18. Bonetti A
    : Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18: 2938-2947, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Cheeseman SL,
    2. Joel SP,
    3. Chester JD,
    4. Wilson G,
    5. Dent JT,
    6. Richards FJ,
    7. Seymour MT
    : A ‘modified de Gramont’ regimen of fluorouracil, alone and with oxaliplatin, for advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 87: 393-399, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Colucci G,
    2. Gebbia V,
    3. Paoletti G,
    4. Giuliani F,
    5. Caruso M,
    6. Gebbia N,
    7. Cartenì G,
    8. Agostara B,
    9. Pezzella G,
    10. Manzione L,
    11. Borsellino N,
    12. Misino A,
    13. Romito S,
    14. Durini E,
    15. Cordio S,
    16. Di Seri M,
    17. Lopez M,
    18. Maiello E,
    19. Montemurro S,
    20. Cramarossa A,
    21. Lorusso V,
    22. Di Bisceglie M,
    23. Chiarenza M,
    24. Valerio MR,
    25. Guida T,
    26. Leonardi V,
    27. Pisconti S,
    28. Rosati G,
    29. Carrozza F,
    30. Nettis G,
    31. Valdesi M,
    32. Filippelli G,
    33. Fortunato S,
    34. Mancarella S,
    35. Brunetti C,
    36. Gruppo Oncologico Dell'Italia Meridionale
    : PhaseIII randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus FOLFOX4 in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell'ltalia Meridionale. J Clin Oncol 23: 4866-4877, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Yamada Y,
    2. Tahara M,
    3. Miya T,
    4. Satoh T,
    5. Shirao K,
    6. Shimada Y,
    7. Ohtsu A,
    8. Sasaki Y,
    9. Tanigawara Y
    : PhaseI/II study of oxaliplatin with oral S-1 as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 98: 1034-1038, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum
    Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. Second English Edtion. Kanehara Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 2009.
  5. ↵
    1. Kawahara H,
    2. Watanabe K,
    3. Ushigome T,
    4. Noaki R,
    5. Kobayashi S,
    6. Yanaga K
    : Feasibility study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (TS-1; tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil potassium) for colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 59: 134-137, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Therasse P,
    2. Arbuck SG,
    3. Eisenhauer EA,
    4. Wanders J,
    5. Kaplan RS,
    6. Rubinstein L,
    7. Verweij J,
    8. Van Glabbeke M,
    9. van Oosterom AT,
    10. Christian MC,
    11. Gwyther SG
    : New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Center Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 205-216, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Shimayama M
    : The Japanese edition of the National Cancer Institute – common toxicity criteria. Jpn J Cancer Chemother 26: 1084-1144, 1999 (in Japanese).
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Ohtsu A,
    2. Baba H,
    3. Sakata Y,
    4. Mitachi Y,
    5. Horikoshi N,
    6. Sugimachi K,
    7. Taguchi T
    : Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer 83: 141-145, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Shirao K,
    2. Ohtsu A,
    3. Takada H,
    4. Mitachi Y,
    5. Hirakawa K,
    6. Horikoshi N,
    7. Okamura T,
    8. Hirata K,
    9. Saitoh S,
    10. Isomoto H,
    11. Satoh A
    : Phase II study of oral S-1 for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 100: 2355-2361, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Yokota T,
    2. Sano T,
    3. Shimizu Y,
    4. Takahari D,
    5. Senda Y,
    6. Shimura M,
    7. Ura T,
    8. Shitara K,
    9. Nimura Y,
    10. Yatabe Y,
    11. Muro K
    : Pathological complete response of colorectal liver metastases following chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) in combination with bevacizumab: A case report. Oncol Lett 2: 201-205, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Shin SJ,
    2. Jung M,
    3. Jeung HC,
    4. Kim HR,
    5. Rha SY,
    6. Roh JK,
    7. Chung HC,
    8. Ahn JB
    : A phase I pharmacokinetic study of TSU-68 (a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2, FGF and PDFG) in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Invest New Drugs 30: 1501-1510, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kawahara H,
    2. Watanabe K,
    3. Toyama Y,
    4. Yanagisawa S,
    5. Kobayashi S,
    6. Yanaga K
    : Determination of circulating tumor cells for prediction of recurrent colorectal cancer progression. Hepatogastroenterology 59: 2115-2118, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hong YS,
    2. Park YS,
    3. Lim HY,
    4. Lee J,
    5. Kim TW,
    6. Kim KP,
    7. Kim SY,
    8. Baek JY,
    9. Kim JH,
    10. Lee KW,
    11. Chung IJ,
    12. Cho SH,
    13. Lee KH,
    14. Shin SJ,
    15. Kang HJ,
    16. Shin DB,
    17. Jo SJ,
    18. Lee JW
    : S-1 plus oxaliplatin versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, non-inferiority phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 13: 1125-1132, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Neki K,
    2. Kawahara H,
    3. Watanabe K,
    4. Toyama Y,
    5. Akiba T,
    6. Yanaga K
    : Usefulness of circulating tumor cells after preliminary chemotherapy for prediction of response to further anticancer therapy in patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 33: 1769-1772, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Benoist S,
    2. Brouquet A,
    3. Penna C,
    4. Julié C,
    5. El Hajjam M,
    6. Chagnon S,
    7. Mitry E,
    8. Rougier P,
    9. Nordlinger B
    : Complete response of colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy: Does it mean cure? J Clin Oncol 24: 3939-3945, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Chun YS,
    2. Vauthey JN,
    3. Boonsirikamchai P,
    4. Maru DM,
    5. Kopetz S,
    6. Palavecino M,
    7. Curley SA,
    8. Abdalla EK,
    9. Kaur H,
    10. Charnsangavej C,
    11. Loyer EM
    : Association of computed tomography morphologic criteria with pathologic response and survival in patients treated with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases. JAMA 302: 2338-2344, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 9
September 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Chemotherapy with S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) in Combination with Molecular-targeting Agents on Colorectal Liver Metastases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of Chemotherapy with S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) in Combination with Molecular-targeting Agents on Colorectal Liver Metastases
KAZUHIRO WATANABE, HIDEJIRO KAWAHARA, HIROYA ENOMOTO, YOICHI TOYAMA, TADASHI AKIBA, KATSUHIKO YANAGA
Anticancer Research Sep 2013, 33 (9) 3941-3946;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Impact of Chemotherapy with S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) in Combination with Molecular-targeting Agents on Colorectal Liver Metastases
KAZUHIRO WATANABE, HIDEJIRO KAWAHARA, HIROYA ENOMOTO, YOICHI TOYAMA, TADASHI AKIBA, KATSUHIKO YANAGA
Anticancer Research Sep 2013, 33 (9) 3941-3946;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Reminder App for Optimizing Bladder Filling During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Pre-study in Healthy Volunteers
  • Timing and Risk Factors for Hyperglycemia Associated With Anamorelin Administration
  • Identification of Risk Factors for the Local Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-radiofrequency Ablation
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • colorectal cancer
  • oxaliplatin
  • S-1
  • SOX
  • molecular target
  • liver metastasis
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire