Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Cytokine Changes in Response to Radio-/chemotherapeutic Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer

STEFAN REERS, ANN-CHRISTIN PFANNERSTILL, DIRK RADES, REGINA MAUSHAGEN, MICHAELA ANDRATSCHKE, RALPH PRIES and BARBARA WOLLENBERG
Anticancer Research June 2013, 33 (6) 2481-2489;
STEFAN REERS
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANN-CHRISTIN PFANNERSTILL
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DIRK RADES
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
REGINA MAUSHAGEN
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHAELA ANDRATSCHKE
3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum Dachau, Dachau, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RALPH PRIES
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BARBARA WOLLENBERG
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Barbara.Wollenberg{at}uk-sh.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Radiation and systemic chemotherapy are standard treatment strategies for advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer. However, little is known about the implications and changes in the tumor microenvironment, including the T-helper (TH)1/TH2 balance in response to these treatment regimens. The aim of the current study was to unravel the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation on cytokine changes. Materials and Methods: In this study, the effect of radiation and chemotherapeutic treatment (5-fluorouracil and cisplatin) on eight cell lines was determined. Before and after exposure, cytokine levels in culture supernatants of cell lines were evaluated using the Bio-Plex Assay (Bio-Rad) and the Human TH1/TH2 Cytometric Bead Array (Becton Dickinson). Results were correlated with parallel measurements for cellular proliferation assessed by cytotoxicity assay. Results: Seven out of eight cell lines of primary tumors or metastases demonstrated an enhanced level of the cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), after sub-lethal radiation doses. Under treatment with low concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, all examined cell lines showed an increasing secretion of the cytokines IL-6 and G-CSF. In contrast, sub-lethal doses of both cytostatic drugs revealed a dose-dependent decrease in secretion IL-1β. Regarding GM-CSF and TNF-α, we demonstrated an increase in secretion by the primary tumors under low doses of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, whereas the metastases showed a sharp drop of GM-CSF and TNF-α secretion. Chemotherapeutic treatment led to no changes of the IL-8 cytokine profile. Conclusion: The results suggest complex cytokine changes of the tumor microenvironment and more aberrant expression profiles under treatment with radiation and the chemotherapeutic drugs 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin.

  • HNSCC
  • cytokines
  • radio-/chemotherapeutic treatment head and neck cancer

Squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC) is still one of the ten most frequent neoplasms worldwide (1). High failure rates, development of recurrence and distant metastases are often observed in patients with advanced HNSCC undergoing conventional radiochemotherapy (2, 3). In order to improve the therapeutic options and patient survival rates, it is necessary to understand the molecular mechanisms and the changes occurring under radiochemotherapy. The microenvironment in HNSCC extensively affects immune functions on distinct levels due to tumor-induced production of numerous immunosuppressive mediators (4). Investigations with primary cultures of human HNSCC cells indicated high secretion of numerous cytokines involved in indirect modulation of immune responses and pro-angiogenic processes (5, 6). Prominent HNSCC-derived cytokines are interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), as well as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (5, 7-10). Table I summarizes HNSCC-relevant cytokines and their attributed cellular functions.

In relation to the immune response, there are two major subtypes of cytokines: T-helper (TH)1 and TH2. The activation of TH1 cells is associated with a secretion of interferon-γ (IFN-γ), IL-2 and IL-12, initiating a cellular-dominated immune response. TH2-corresponding cytokines are IL-4, IL6, and IL-10, leading to a humoral dominated immune response. In healthy individuals, there is a balance between these two kinds of immune responses (31). Cytokine secretion profiles of patients with HNSCC show a bias from TH1 to TH2 and more aberrant expression profiles with more advanced disease resulting in inhibition of cellular immune response (32, 33). This TH2-mediated immunity has prognostic implications, as demonstrated in other carcinoma, increased expression of TH1 cytokines are associated with a favorable prognosis (34). Furthermore, a dendritic cell-based cancer-specific immunotherapy, derived from donors with advanced malignant disease exhibiting TH2-dominant immunity, as a new potent strategy for various types of carcinomas, showed an impairment of antitumor immune response (35). In this study, we analyzed the influence of radio- and chemotherapeutic treatment on the progression and cytokine secretion characteristics in permanent HNSCC cell lines generated from primary HNSCC and corresponding metastases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Head and neck squamous cell cancer-relevant cytokines and their attributed functions.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture. The HNSCC cell lines used here were generated on the one hand from primary tumors: a hypopharyngeal carcinoma (PCI-I; Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, PA, USA) and an oropharyngeal carcinoma (BHY; Deutsche Sammlung für Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen, Braunschweig, Germany). On the other hand, the tumor lines designated ‘UT-SCC’, all established at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (University of Turku; Turku, Finland), were paired and generated from the primary (A) and metastatic lymph nodes (B) of the same patients: a cutis nasi tumor (UT-SCC 12A/B), a left tonsillar carcinoma (UT-SCC 60A/B) and a tongue carcinoma (UT-SCC 74A/B). The cells were cultured in serum-free high-glucose (DMEM; PAA, Pasching, Austria) supplemented with 2.5% HEPES buffer, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% L-glutamine, 1% nonessential amino acids. All the compounds were endotoxin tested. Incubation was carried out in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C until there was a sub-confluent layer of cells before sub-culturing. Cells were detached from culture flasks by trypsination, centrifuged (200xg, for 8 min at 30°C) and resuspended in culture medium as mentioned above.

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide-based cell assay (MTT). Cell proliferation was determined by a quantitative colorimetric MTT assay. This assay determines viable cell numbers based on the mitochondrial conversion of MTT. 5,000 cells were dispersed into each well of a 96-well plate. Twenty-four hours after culture, four different concentrations of 5-flourouracil or cisplatin were added to the cultures, or the cells were radiated at three doses. For comparison, untreated cell cells from each cell line were cultured simultaneously.

After 144 h 10 μl of MTT dye (five mg/ml) was added to each well. After two hours of incubation with MTT, crystals were solubilized and gently shaken for twenty-four hours at room temperature. The absorbance of the reduced formazan product in control and experimental wells was read using a multi-well ELISA reader at a wavelength of 570 nm and 690 nm.

Expression profiles of cytokine and growth factors in cell culture supernatants. Investigating cytokines and growth-factors in supernatants collected from the cell-lines mentioned above, we measured the concentrations of the prominent TH1-like and the TH2-like cytokines, as well as the growth-factors G-CSF and GM-CSF using two commonly used bead-specific assays: the Bio-Rad Bio-Plex Assay (Bio-Rad-Laboratories) and the flow cytometry-based Human TH1/TH2 Becton Dickinson Cytometric Bead Array (CBA; BD Biosciences). The principle of these methods are similar to a capture sandwich immunoassay. 250,000 cells were seeded into cell culture flasks (25 mm2) and quadruplicate aliquots of 200 μl supernatants of control and experimental samples were extracted on ice after 144 h and then stored at −80°C before analysis. Regular testing of the supernatants was performed to check for bacterial contamination to exclude that the observed effect was not a consequence of microbial contamination. Furthermore, no cytokines were detected neither in cell-free DMEM nor in cytostatic supplements. The cytokine-specific Bio-Plex Human TH1/TH2 Assay Kit detecting IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IFN-γ, GM-CSF and Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) was purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA) and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fifty microliters of a serial dilution of the standards for the standard curve and 50 μl of the undiluted sample supernatants and control samples after thawing on ice, respectively, were added to a 96-well microtiter plate with beads coated with the corresponding antibodies. Plates were incubated on a plate shaker for 120 min. After unbound cytokines are removed by washing and filtration, biotinylated detection antibodies were added to the reaction. The complexes were detected by the addition of streptavidin-phycoerythrin (streptavidin-PE) by a special microtiter plate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, Munich, Germany). Corresponding data were analysed with the Bio-Plex software manager which automatically calculates the concentration of cytokines from a standard curve. The CBA Human Flex Set (BD Biosciences, San Jose (CA, USA) combines the principles of the sandwich immunoassay with flow cytometry. In our study this array was used for the detection of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF and G-CSF. Initially, the bead populations had to be identified in the fluorescence channels APC-Cy7 and APC of the flow cytometer. During the incubation of the beads with a total of 50 μl of cell culture supernatant for 60 min, the cytokines in the supernatant were bound by their corresponding beads. PE-labeled detection antibodies were added to the cytokine-capturing beads to form sandwich complexes. Following incubation and washing, the samples were acquired using a FACSCanto instrument and the results were analyzed with the FCAP Array Software provided by BD Biosciences. For this method, standard curves were also generated for each cytokine and the concentration for each cytokine in samples was also determined by interpolation from the standard curves.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Detection of cytokines in the supernatant of eight head and neck cancer cell lines.

Statistical analysis. The cell viability data were calculated from the density readings at wavelengths of 570 nm and 690 nm. Growth under treatment with cytostatic agents and irradiation was calculated relating to that for control wells (normalized to 100%) and data are represented graphically as the mean±SD in a fitted curve. All growth samples of the MTT assay were carried out in triplicate. When the levels of cytokines were below the limit of detection for each method, the value was considered as zero in the analysis. By MTT assay, the cell number in each culture flask was determined to standardize the concentration of cytokine as that secreted per 106 vital tumor cells.

Results

Investigating the patterns of TH1/TH2 cytokines in terms of the relative balance between TH1 and TH2 profiles and their subsequent polarization toward either TH1 or TH2 in response to radio-/chemotherapeutic treatment, we measured 14 cytokines in the supernatants from each cell line. Detection of the tested cytokines in the cell culture supernatants by each method are shown in Table II.

As shown in Table II we detected G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α. The supernatant cytokine concentration for IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12 and IL-13 was below the detection limit (<5 pg/ml/106 cells), both in supernatants from cells after cytotoxic exposure and from control cells. For this reason, there is no further mentioning of these cytokines other than in Table II.

Cytokine profiles of cells without treatment. In the supernatant of the eight untreated HNSCC cell lines, we detected GM-CSF and TNF-α using Bio-Plex system™ (Bio-Rad-Laboratories) as well as G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 using the Flex-set-system™ (BD Biosciences), at different concentrations (Table III).

Table III shows a heterogenous profile of cytokines found in HNSCC cell lines, regarding both cytokine type and concentration. Furthermore, small differences were found due to the different methods. The cytokines G-CSF, GM-CSF and IL-1β were detected for all cell lines, except for PCI-I and UT-SCC 74B. While GM-CSF was not found in UT-SCC 74B cells using the Bio-plex-systemTM method, the Flex-set-system™ found a detectable amount of GM-CSF. All cell lines secreted IL-6 and IL-8, whereas TNF-α was only found in the supernatant from PCI-I, UT-SCC 60A, UT-SCC 60B and UT-SCC 74B cells. The cell line UT-SCC 60B secreted a remarkably high concentration of TNF-α (7300.4 pg/ml/106 cells), which was much higher than the concentration of the other three cell lines (PCI-I: 2.4 pg/ml/106 cells, UT-SCC 60A: 7.2 pg/ml/106 cells, UT-SCC 74B: 29.0 pg/ml/106 cells).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Secretion of cytokines by HNSCC cell lines after 144 h of culture.

Cytokine profiles of cell lines under treatment with 5-fluorouracil. The eight cell lines were cultured for 144 h with four different concentrations of 5-flurouracil (10, 50, 100, 200 μM). The effect of different concentrations of 5-fluorouracil on cytokine secretion is shown in Figure 1A for the cell line UT-SCC 60A. Highlighting differences between primary tumors and metastases, a combined description of UT-SCC 60A and 60B is shown in Figure 1B and C. As shown in Figure 1, the addition of increasing concentrations of 5-fluorouracil modified the concentration of IL-1β in supernatants, in terms of diminishing values. In contrast, sub-lethal concentrations of the cytostatic drug stimulated the secretion of G-CSF and IL-6 in all screened HNSCC cell lines. Concerning GM-CSF and TNF-α, we observed differentially-modulated cytokine patterns after cytostatic exposure: sub-lethal concentrations of 5-fluorouracil induced an increase in GM-CSF and TNF-α in the primary tumor cell line (Figure 1B and C, UT-SCC 60A), whereas the metastastic cell line reacted with a dose-dependent decrease. The same cytokine response towards 5-fluorouracil was observable in the cell line pair UT-SCC 12A and B, but not in UT-SCC 74A and B (data not shown). Unlike the other cell line pairs, both UT-SCC 74A and B reacted to sub-lethal concentrations of 5-fluorouracil with increasing secretion of GM-CSF (data not shown). UT-SCC 60A/B is the only pair for which both cell lines secrete TNF-α. Interestingly, the primary tumor cell line PCI-I also exhibited a similar expression pattern to that of UT-SCC 60A, and the metastastatic cell line UT-SCC 74B demonstrated a pattern similar to that of UT-SCC 60B (Figure 2A). There was no response after exposure to 5-fluorouracil for the cytokine IL-8 (Figure 1A).

Cytokine profiles of cell lines under treatment with cisplatin. The eight cell lines were cultured for 144 h with four different concentrations of cisplatin (1, 10, 20, 50 μM). Figure 1 demonstrates the dose-dependent cytotoxicity in combination with the correlating cytokine secretion. All screened HNSCC cell lines showed a dose-dependent decrease of IL-1β under cisplatin treatment, whereas a sub-lethal dose induced an increased secretion of G-CSF and IL-6 (Figure 1D). Furthermore, we observed a difference between the cytokine secretion of the primary tumor cell lines and metastatic cell lines for GM-CSF and TNF-α. Low concentrations of cisplatin caused an increase of GM-CSF and TNF-α by the primary tumor cell lines, while the metastatic cell lines reacted with a concentration-dependent decrease of these cytokines (Figure 1E and F). This expression response was found in the cell lines UT-SCC 12A/B, UT-SCC 60A/B, and UT-SCC 74A/B (data not shown), similarly. Apart from the cell lines UT-SCC 60A and B, the cytokine TNF-α was only measurable in supernatants of two other cell lines: PCI-I and UT-SCC 74B. The primary tumor cell line PCI-I reacted to treatment with cisplatin by secreting rising amounts of TNF-α, similarly to UT-SCC 60A, whereas the metastatic cell lines UT-SCC 60B and 74B showed a dose-dependent decrease of TNF-α (Figure 2B). Under treatment with cisplatin, IL-8 was also measurable. However, similarly to the treatment with 5-fluorouracil, the concentration of IL-8 was no altered by exposure to cisplatin (Figure 1D).

Cytokine profiles of cell lines under radiation. The eight cell lines were irradiated at three different doses (6, 12, 18 Gy) and cultured for 144 h. As previously, the trend of the cytokine concentrations in the supernatants are exemplarily shown by the cell line pair UT-SCC 60A and B (Figure 1J, K, L). Following radiation, we observed different cytokine modulations to these findings under chemotherapy. All examined cytokines were increased under sub-lethal radiation doses. Only the UT-SCC 60B cell line was an exception, with decreasing secretion of GM-CSF and TNF-α.

Discussion

Recent data confirmed that patients with HNSCC had a partial TH2 cytokine bias and a more aberrant cytokine expression with more advanced disease (32). This TH2 phenotype included enhanced levels of the TH2 cytokines IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10, as well as diminished levels of the TH1 cytokine IFN-γ. Since levels of the TH1 cytokines IL-2 and GM-CSF are also elevated, this bias towards the TH2 phenotype is incomplete (32). Individual characteristics and cytokine expression levels of patients with HNSCC are critical factors for prognosis and efficiency of anti-tumor therapy. The differences are most likely due to specific half-life kinetics, metabolism, or binding protein modulation parameters (4, 36, 37). The rare early tumor stages I and II are treated primarily with radiation and surgery, whereas patients with advanced cancer (stage III and IV) often receive a multi-modal therapy consisting of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. As most carcinomas are diagnosed in advanced stages, radiochemotherapy represents an essential part of most treatments (38). Radiochemotherapy leads to various changes, not only in the radiated area, but also for the whole body. The systemic cytokine changes have been partly described in a few studies. However, there have been no investigation of cytokine behavior under chemotherapy without radiation. Most studies included the cytokines IL-6 and IL-8, which showed an increasing blood concentration under radiochemotherapy (39, 40). Silver observed an increase in concentration of IL-1β and IL-10 four weeks after radiochemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin (40). Meirovitz also IL-1, IL-10 and TNF-α examined in addition to IL-6 and IL-8. Two weeks after a radiochemotherapy regimen consisting of cisplatin, carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil and docetaxel, concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 increased, but not these of IL-1 and IL-10. Both cytokines showed no changes after the combined treatment. In contrast to IL-6 and IL-8, serum concentrations of TNF-α decreased under radiochemotherapy (39). These investigations illustrate that the cytokine profiles of patients with HNSCC under radiochemotherapy are more aberrant and the bias from TH1 to TH2 more intensified. Ex vivo studies are even rarer: only one publication showed that cisplatin induced IL-6 expression and tumorigenicity (41). The behavior of the other cytokines and the local changes of the micromilieu are still unknown. Hence, we investigated the expression patterns of 14 cytokines in eight HNSCC cell lines under treatment with radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs. As described in the literature we also observed an increase in some cytokine secretions in response to radio- or chemotherapeutic treatment. A decrease of secretion of IL-1β was measurable under chemotherapy with both cytostatic drugs used here. In contrast to the serum cytokine data of Silver, we demonstrated enhanced expression of IL-1β under radiation. In HNSCC, increased secretion of IL-1β has been implicated in tumor progression, resistance to natural killer cells and up-regulation of SNAIL (19, 20). The transcription factor SNAIL, in turn, suppressed E-cadherin expression and enabled a complete epithelial mesenchymal transition in HNSCC (42, 43). IL-6, which is a multi-functional regulator of immune response and highly expressed in HNSCC, was secreted in rising amounts under radiation and treatment with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (21). The same observation was described by Meirovitz et al. (39). As an exception to our measurements, only the metastatic cell line UT-SCC 60B reacted to radiation with decreased secretion of IL-6. A modulated expression of this cytokine has implications on its suggested function in HNSCC, such as cell proliferation, tumorigenesis and invasive potential as the first step of tumor metastasis (22, 23). In addition to IL-6, we also detected IL-8, another prominent HNSCC-derived cytokine. IL-8 showed no response to exposure to 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. In contrast, radiation induced increasing expression of this cytokine. IL-8 is known to promote angiogenesis and tumor growth activity and is elevated in the serum of patients with HNSCC after combined radiochemotherapy (7, 39). The secretion of G-CSF showed a relatively uniform behavior towards anticancer therapy: all investigated therapies, radiation as well as a treatment with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin at sublethal doses, resulted in stimulation of cytokine secretion. It has been shown that G-CSF, as well as GM-CSF, promote tumor progression, angiogenesis and the recruitment of inflammatory cells in HNSCC (13). Recently, studies in other tumors have revealed G-CSF to be an efficient agent for promoting cycling of dormant hematopoietic stem cells and cancer stem cells (44, 45). For the G-CSF-related cytokine GM-CSF, we observed an interesting progression in most studied cell lines: low concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin caused increased secretion of GM-CSF in primary tumor cell lines, whereas the metastatic cell lines reacted with a concentration-dependent decrease of this cytokine. Similarly, all examined cell lines showed enhanced secretion of GM-CSF under sub-lethal radiation with one exception, a concentration-dependent decrease was measurable by the metastatic cell line UT-SCC 60B. We are unaware of any studies on HNSCC that included G-CSF or CM-CSF and their changes in response to radiochemotherapy. The cytokine-modulating effect that we measured, has an impact on the functions of GM-CSF, such as in angiogenesis, proliferation, migration, and inflammatory cell recruitment, as well as CD34+ cell mobilization (13, 14). Another analyzed cytokine was TNF-α, which revealed changes of secretion under radio-/chemotherapy. Only in the supernatants of four cell lines did we detect the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α. Under treatment of radiation and chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, we measured enhanced levels of TNF-α in the two primary tumor cell lines, whereas the two metastatic cell lines showed a dose-dependent decrease of this cytokine. A drop of serum TNF-α in patients with HNSCC after radiochemotherapy has beend described (39). In HNSCC, TNF-α enhanced the enzymatic activities of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9, as well as cell invasion (29). These cytokine changes raise questions concerning the genesis of the differences. It is noticeable that only the UT-SCC 60B cell line reacted to radiation with reduced secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, GM-CSF and TNF-α, whereas all other cell lines increased cytokine levels under this kind of treatment. In addition, the cell line UT-SCC 60B also had the highest levels of IL-1β, IL-6, GM-CSF and TNF-α under untreated conditions. Many studies demonstrated IL-4 and IL-10 to be expressed at low levels in primary HNSCC cultures as well as in permanent cell lines (5, 8, 10). In comparison, we did not measure significant levels (>5 pg/ml) of these cytokines. Summarizing, our results showed enhanced levels of the cytokines IL-6 and G-CSF, as well as decreased levels of IL-1β of primary tumor cell lines and their metastatic cell lines under sub-lethal chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Furthermore, treatment of the primary tumor cell lines with both these cytostatic drugs resulted in increasing levels of GM-CSF and TNF-α, whereas the metastatic lines reacted with a dose-dependent decrease of these cytokines. Expression of IL-8 did not change under therapy with these chemotherapeutic drugs. Moreover, radiation of HNSCC cells led to increasing concentrations of all examined cytokines with only one metastatic cell line as an exception, which revealed a decreasing secretion of IL-1β, IL6, GM-CSF and TNF-α. These data strongly suggest that a radiochemotherapy leads to complex changes of the tumor microenvironment.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Dose-dependent cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion of the cell lines UT-SCC 60A and B under treatment with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiation. For clear presentation of the low concentration ranges, segmentation of the x-axis was added. A: Cytokines with similar concentration patterns in all cell lines, i.e. there were no differences between primary tumor (UT-SCC 60A) and the corresponding metastatic line (UT-SCC 60B). B and C: Different patterns of GM-CSF and TNF-α expression between primary tumor and metastatic cell lines. Data are means±SD; relative viability: n=3-6, GM-CSF: n=2, other cytokines: n=1.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Dose-dependent cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion of the cell lines PCI-I and UT-SCC 74B under treatment with 5-fluorouracil (A) and cisplatin (B) As shown in Figure 1, increasing concentrations of 5-fluorouracil caused an increased TNF-α level in the primary tumor PCI-I, as far as UT-SCC 60A in Figure 1, and a dose-dependent decrease of TNF-α in the metastatic cell line UTSCC 74B, similar to UT-SCC 60B in Figure 1. Data are means±SD; relative viability: n=3-6, TNF-α: n=1.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Dr. Mandic, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Marburg, Germany, for providing the UT-SCC cell lines and Professor Grénman for establishing these cell lines.

We thank Birgit Hüsing and Brigitte Wollmann for their skillful support in some parts of this work.

We are grateful to all members of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology for helpful discussions and a comfortable atmosphere. This work was supported by grants from the Mildred-Scheel-Stiftung (Deutsche Krebshilfe), the Werner-and-Klara-Kreitz-Stiftung, the Monika-Kutzner-Stiftung, and the Rudolf-Bartling-Stiftung.

We also thank Invitrogen Bio-Rad and Becton Dickinson for their technical support and in providing us with kits to test.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Competing Interests

    The Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • Received April 5, 2013.
  • Revision received April 29, 2013.
  • Accepted April 30, 2013.
  • Copyright© 2013 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Shin HR,
    3. Bray F,
    4. Forman D,
    5. Mathers C,
    6. Parkin DM
    : Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127(12): 2893-917. 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Haddad RI,
    2. DM Shin
    : Recent advances in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 359(11): 1143-54, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Hauswald H,
    2. Simon C,
    3. Hecht S,
    4. Debus J,
    5. Lindel K
    : Long-term outcome and patterns of failure in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol 6: 70, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Chin D,
    2. Boyle GM,
    3. Theile DR,
    4. Parsons PG,
    5. Coman WB
    : Molecular introduction to head and neck cancer (HNSCC) carcinogenesis. Br J Plast Surg 57(7): 595-602, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Mann EA,
    2. Spiro JD,
    3. Chen LL,
    4. Kreutzer DL
    : Cytokine expression by head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Surg 164(6): 567-573, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Pries R,
    2. Wollenberg B
    : Cytokines in head and neck cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 17(3): 141-146, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Chen Z,
    2. Malhotra PS,
    3. Thomas GR,
    4. Ondrey FG,
    5. Duffey DC,
    6. Smith CW,
    7. Enamorado I,
    8. Yeh NT,
    9. Kroog GS,
    10. Rudy S,
    11. McCullagh L,
    12. Mousa S,
    13. Quezado M,
    14. Herscher LL,
    15. Van Waes C
    : Expression of proinflammatory and proangiogenic cytokines in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 5(6): 1369-1379, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Woods KV,
    2. El-Naggar A,
    3. Clayman GL,
    4. Grimm EA
    : Variable expression of cytokines in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines and consistent expression in surgical specimens. Cancer Res 58(14): 3132-3141, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Eisma RJ,
    2. Spiro JD,
    3. Kreutzer DL
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg 174(5): 513-517, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Pries R,
    2. Thiel A,
    3. Brocks C,
    4. Wollenberg B
    : Secretion of tumor-promoting and immune suppressive cytokines by cell lines of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In Vivo 20(1): 45-48, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Montag M,
    2. Dyckhoff G,
    3. Lohr J,
    4. Helmke BM,
    5. Herrmann E,
    6. Plinkert PK,
    7. Herold-Mende C
    : Angiogenic growth factors in tissue homogenates of HNSCC: Expression pattern, prognostic relevance, and interrelationships. Cancer Sci 100(7): 1210-1218, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ninck S,
    2. Reisser C,
    3. Dyckhoff G,
    4. Helmke B,
    5. Bauer H,
    6. Herold-Mende C
    : Expression profiles of angiogenic growth factors in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Int J Cancer 106(1): 34-44, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gutschalk CM,
    2. Herold-Mende CC,
    3. Fusenig NE,
    4. Mueller MM
    : Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promote malignant growth of cells from head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in vivo. Cancer Res 66(16): 8026-8036, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Young MR,
    2. Wright MA,
    3. Lozano Y,
    4. Prechel MM,
    5. Benefield J,
    6. Leonetti JP,
    7. Collins SL,
    8. Petruzzelli GJ
    : Increased recurrence and metastasis in patients whose primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas secreted granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and contained CD34+ natural suppressor cells. Int J Cancer 74(1): 69-74, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Worden B,
    2. Yang XP,
    3. Lee TL,
    4. Bagain L,
    5. Yeh NT,
    6. Cohen JG,
    7. Van Waes C,
    8. Chen Z
    : Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor differentially regulates expression of proangiogenic factors through EGR-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 65(16): 7071-7080, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wolf JS,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Dong G,
    4. Sunwoo JB,
    5. Bancroft CC,
    6. Capo DE,
    7. Yeh NT,
    8. Mukaida N,
    9. Van Waes C
    : IL (interleukin)-1α promotes nuclear factor-KB and AP-1-induced IL-8 expression, cell survival, and proliferation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 7(6): 1812-1820, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Mann EA,
    2. Hibbs MS,
    3. Spiro JD,
    4. Bowik C,
    5. Wang XZ,
    6. Clawson M,
    7. Chen LL
    : Cytokine regulation of gelatinase production by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: The role of tumor necrosis factor-α. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104(3): 203-209, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mukhopadhyay P,
    2. Ali MA,
    3. Nandi A,
    4. Carreon P,
    5. Choy H,
    6. Saha D
    : The cyclin-dependent kinase 2 inhibitor down-regulates interleukin-1β-mediated induction of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 66(3): 1758-1766, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Teruel A,
    2. Romero M,
    3. Cacalano NA,
    4. Head C,
    5. Jewett A
    : Potential contribution of naive immune effectors to oral tumor resistance: Role in synergistic induction of VEGF, IL-6, and IL-8 secretion. Cancer Immunol Immunother 57(3): 359-366, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. St John MA,
    2. Dohadwala M,
    3. Luo J,
    4. Wang G,
    5. Lee G,
    6. Shih H,
    7. Heinrich E,
    8. Krysan K,
    9. Walser T,
    10. Hazra S,
    11. Zhu L,
    12. Lai C,
    13. Abemayor E,
    14. Fishbein M,
    15. Elashoff DA,
    16. Sharma S,
    17. Dubinett SM
    : Proinflammatory mediators up-regulate SNAIL in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 15(19): 6018-6027, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Heinrich PC,
    2. Behrmann I,
    3. Haan S,
    4. Hermanns HM,
    5. Müller-Newen G,
    6. Schaper F
    : Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokine signalling and its regulation. Biochem J 374(Pt 1): 1-20, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kanazawa T,
    2. Nishino H,
    3. Hasegawa M,
    4. Ohta Y,
    5. Iino Y,
    6. Ichimura K,
    7. Noda Y
    : Interleukin-6 directly influences proliferation and invasion potential of head and neck cancer cells. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(7): 815-821, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Gasche JA,
    2. Hoffmann J,
    3. Boland CR,
    4. Goel A
    : Interleukin-6 promotes tumorigenesis by altering DNA methylation in oral cancer cells. Int J Cancer 129(5): 1053-1063, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bancroft CC,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Dong G,
    4. Sunwoo JB,
    5. Yeh N,
    6. Park C,
    7. Van Waes C
    : Coexpression of proangiogenic factors IL-8 and VEGF by human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma involves coactivation by MEK-MAPK and IKK-NF-KB signal pathways. Clin Cancer Res 7(2): 435-442, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Suzuki F,
    2. Nakamaru Y,
    3. Oridate N,
    4. Homma A,
    5. Nagahashi T,
    6. Yamaguchi S,
    7. Nishihira J,
    8. Furuta Y,
    9. Fukuda S
    : Prognostic significance of cytoplasmic macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Oncol Rep 13(1): 59-64, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bekeredjian-Ding I,
    2. Schäfer M,
    3. Hartmann E,
    4. Pries R,
    5. Parcina M,
    6. Schneider P,
    7. Giese T,
    8. Endres S,
    9. Wollenberg B,
    10. Hartmann G
    : Tumour-derived prostaglandin E and transforming growth factor-β synergize to inhibit plasmacytoid dendritic cell-derived interferon-α. Immunology 128(3): 439-450, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zeidler R,
    2. Csanady M,
    3. Gires O,
    4. Lang S,
    5. Schmitt B,
    6. Wollenberg B
    : Tumor cell-derived prostaglandin E 2 inhibits monocyte function by interfering with CCR5 and MAC-1. FASEB J 14(5): 661-668, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Yapijakis C,
    2. Serefoglou Z,
    3. Vylliotis A,
    4. Nkenke E,
    5. Derka S,
    6. Vassiliou S,
    7. Avgoustidis D,
    8. Neukam FW,
    9. Patsouris E,
    10. Vairaktaris E
    : Association of polymorphisms in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Beta genes with increased risk for oral cancer. Anticancer Res 29(6): 2379-2386, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Koontongkaew S,
    2. Amornphimoltham P,
    3. Yapong B
    : Tumorstroma interactions influence cytokine expression and matrix metalloproteinase activities in paired primary and metastatic head and neck cancer cells. Cell Biol Int 33(2): 165-173, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Young MR,
    2. Petruzzelli GJ,
    3. Kolesiak K,
    4. Achille N,
    5. Lathers DM,
    6. Gabrilovich DI
    : Human squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck chemoattract immune suppressive CD34(+) progenitor cells. Hum Immunol 62(4): 332-341, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Becker Y
    : Molecular immunological approaches to biotherapy of human cancers – a review, hypothesis and implications. Anticancer Res 26(2A): 1113-1134, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Lathers DM,
    2. Young MR
    : Increased aberrance of cytokine expression in plasma of patients with more advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cytokine 25(5): 220-228, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Sparano A,
    2. Lathers DM,
    3. Achille N,
    4. Petruzzelli GJ,
    5. Young MR
    : Modulation of Th1 and Th2 cytokine profiles and their association with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(5): 573-576, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Kondo T,
    2. Nakazawa H,
    3. Ito F,
    4. Hashimoto Y,
    5. Osaka Y,
    6. Futatsuyama K,
    7. Toma H,
    8. Tanabe K
    : Favorable prognosis of renal cell carcinoma with increased expression of chemokines associated with a Th1-type immune response. Cancer Sci 97(8): 780-786, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Mashino K,
    2. Sadanaga N,
    3. Tanaka F,
    4. Ohta M,
    5. Yamaguchi H,
    6. Mori M
    : Effective strategy of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy for advanced tumor-bearing hosts: The critical role of Th1-dominant immunity. Mol Cancer Ther 1(10): 785-794, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Whiteside TL
    : Immunobiology and immunotherapy of head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 3(1): 46-55, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Whiteside TL
    : Immunobiology of head and neck cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 24(1): 95-105, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Posner MR
    : Integrating systemic agents into multimodality treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 7): 246-251, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Meirovitz A,
    2. Kuten M,
    3. Billan S,
    4. Abdah-Bortnyak R,
    5. Sharon A,
    6. Peretz T,
    7. Sela M,
    8. Schaffer M,
    9. Barak V
    : Cytokines levels, severity of acute mucositis and the need of PEG tube installation during chemo-radiation for head and neck cancer – a prospective pilot study. Radiat Oncol 5: 16, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Silver HJ,
    2. Dietrich MS,
    3. Murphy B
    : Changes in body mass, energy balance, physical function, and inflammatory state in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation after low-dose induction chemotherapy. Head Neck 29(10): 893-900, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Poth KJ,
    2. Guminski AD,
    3. Thomas GP,
    4. Leo PJ,
    5. Jabbar IA,
    6. Saunders NA
    : Cisplatin treatment induces a transient increase in tumorigenic potential associated with high interleukin-6 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther 9(8): 2430-2439, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Batlle E,
    2. Sancho E,
    3. Francí C,
    4. Domínguez D,
    5. Monfar M,
    6. Baulida J,
    7. García De Herreros A
    : The transcription factor SNAIL is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol 2(2): 84-89, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Takkunen M,
    2. Grenman R,
    3. Hukkanen M,
    4. Korhonen M,
    5. García de Herreros A,
    6. Virtanen I
    : Snail-dependent and -independent epithelial mesenchymal transition in oral squamous carcinoma cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 54(11): 1263-1275, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Saito Y,
    2. Uchida N,
    3. Tanaka S,
    4. Suzuki N,
    5. Tomizawa-Murasawa M,
    6. Sone A,
    7. Najima Y,
    8. Takagi S,
    9. Aoki Y,
    10. Wake A,
    11. Taniguchi S,
    12. Shultz LD,
    13. Ishikawa F
    : Induction of cell cycle entry eliminates human leukemia stem cells in a mouse model of AML. Nat Biotechnol 28(3): 275-280. 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Wilson A,
    2. Laurenti E,
    3. Oser G,
    4. van der Wath RC,
    5. Blanco-Bose W,
    6. Jaworski M,
    7. Offner S,
    8. Dunant CF,
    9. Eshkind L,
    10. Bockamp E,
    11. Lió P,
    12. Macdonald HR,
    13. Trumpp A
    : Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell 135(6): 1118-1129, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 6
June 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cytokine Changes in Response to Radio-/chemotherapeutic Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Cytokine Changes in Response to Radio-/chemotherapeutic Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer
STEFAN REERS, ANN-CHRISTIN PFANNERSTILL, DIRK RADES, REGINA MAUSHAGEN, MICHAELA ANDRATSCHKE, RALPH PRIES, BARBARA WOLLENBERG
Anticancer Research Jun 2013, 33 (6) 2481-2489;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Cytokine Changes in Response to Radio-/chemotherapeutic Treatment in Head and Neck Cancer
STEFAN REERS, ANN-CHRISTIN PFANNERSTILL, DIRK RADES, REGINA MAUSHAGEN, MICHAELA ANDRATSCHKE, RALPH PRIES, BARBARA WOLLENBERG
Anticancer Research Jun 2013, 33 (6) 2481-2489;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Eicosanoid regulation of debris-stimulated metastasis
  • The Mystery of Chemotherapy Brain: Kynurenines, Tubulin and Biophoton Release
  • S-Nitrosylation of cIAP1 Switches Cancer Cell Fate from TNF{alpha}/TNFR1-Mediated Cell Survival to Cell Death
  • Resolvins suppress tumor growth and enhance cancer therapy
  • EGFR Inhibition Induces Proinflammatory Cytokines via NOX4 in HNSCC
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Gossypol Inhibits GLI3-dependent SHH Signaling to Selectively Target SPOP-deficient Breast Cancer Cells
  • Ubiquitin Ligase RNF149 Promotes Head and Neck Cancer Growth via Downregulation of CDKN2C
  • NK92-exo Induces Ferroptosis in A549 Cells by Targeting a miR-663a-SLC11A2 Axis
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • HNSCC
  • cytokines
  • radio-/chemotherapeutic treatment head and neck cancer
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire