Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Comparison of Calculated Dose by Helical Tomotherapy Treatment Planning Machine and Measured Dose of Radiophotoluminescence Glass Dosimeter in Lung Lesions Using Rando Phantom

HIDEYA YAMAZAKI, KAZUKI IWAMA, TAKUYA NISHIMURA, YASUNORI IWAI, NORIHIRO AIBE, TADASHI TAKENAKA, SHUNSUKE MIYAKE, EIICHI TANAKA, KEN YOSHIDA, YOSHITAKA OOTA, HIROYASU IKENO, SATOAKAI NAKAMURA and HARUUMI OKABE
Anticancer Research April 2013, 33 (4) 1679-1684;
HIDEYA YAMAZAKI
1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
2Department of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji City, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hideya10{at}hotmail.com
KAZUKI IWAMA
2Department of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji City, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKUYA NISHIMURA
1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
2Department of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji City, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUNORI IWAI
3Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NORIHIRO AIBE
1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
2Department of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji City, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TADASHI TAKENAKA
3Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHUNSUKE MIYAKE
3Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EIICHI TANAKA
3Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEN YOSHIDA
3Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHITAKA OOTA
2Department of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji City, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROYASU IKENO
1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SATOAKAI NAKAMURA
1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARUUMI OKABE
2Department of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji City, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Adult female Rando phantom.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Calculated positions and comparison of calculated dose by helical tomotherapy treatment planning machine and measured dose of radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter (RPLGD) in a lung lesion using a Rando phantom. These photographs were taken from a cranial direction (mock tumor was located in the left lung). Higher dose, 105% of calculated, shown in red; acceptable dose ratio 95-105%, shown in white; lower dose, less than 95% of calculated shown in blue.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Stereotactic body radiotherapy plan generated by treatment planning system for mock lung tumor. The prescribed dose is 10 Gy in five fractions.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table I.
  • Table II.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 4
April 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Calculated Dose by Helical Tomotherapy Treatment Planning Machine and Measured Dose of Radiophotoluminescence Glass Dosimeter in Lung Lesions Using Rando Phantom
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Calculated Dose by Helical Tomotherapy Treatment Planning Machine and Measured Dose of Radiophotoluminescence Glass Dosimeter in Lung Lesions Using Rando Phantom
HIDEYA YAMAZAKI, KAZUKI IWAMA, TAKUYA NISHIMURA, YASUNORI IWAI, NORIHIRO AIBE, TADASHI TAKENAKA, SHUNSUKE MIYAKE, EIICHI TANAKA, KEN YOSHIDA, YOSHITAKA OOTA, HIROYASU IKENO, SATOAKAI NAKAMURA, HARUUMI OKABE
Anticancer Research Apr 2013, 33 (4) 1679-1684;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Comparison of Calculated Dose by Helical Tomotherapy Treatment Planning Machine and Measured Dose of Radiophotoluminescence Glass Dosimeter in Lung Lesions Using Rando Phantom
HIDEYA YAMAZAKI, KAZUKI IWAMA, TAKUYA NISHIMURA, YASUNORI IWAI, NORIHIRO AIBE, TADASHI TAKENAKA, SHUNSUKE MIYAKE, EIICHI TANAKA, KEN YOSHIDA, YOSHITAKA OOTA, HIROYASU IKENO, SATOAKAI NAKAMURA, HARUUMI OKABE
Anticancer Research Apr 2013, 33 (4) 1679-1684;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Real-world Delivery and Outcomes of Intravesical BCG for Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Early Progressive Disease Predicts Poor Outcomes of Second-line VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy After First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Evaluation of Quality Metrics for Dose Assessment in Field Overlap Regions of VMAT-Based Craniospinal Axis Irradiation
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • tomotherapy
  • lung tumor
  • stereotactic body radiotherapy
  • radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter
  • Rando phantom
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire