Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Murine Double Minute 2 and Its Association with Chemoradioresistance of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

HIROSHI OKAMOTO, FUMIYOSHI FUJISHIMA, YASUHIRO NAKAMURA, MASASHI ZUGUCHI, GO MIYATA, TAKASHI KAMEI, TORU NAKANO, KAZUNORI KATSURA, SHIGEO ABE, YUSUKE TANIYAMA, JIN TESHIMA, MIKA WATANABE, AKIRA SATO, NORIAKI OHUCHI and HIRONOBU SASANO
Anticancer Research April 2013, 33 (4) 1463-1471;
HIROSHI OKAMOTO
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
3Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hi-ok-0531@med.tohoku.ac.jp
FUMIYOSHI FUJISHIMA
3Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUHIRO NAKAMURA
2Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASASHI ZUGUCHI
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GO MIYATA
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI KAMEI
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORU NAKANO
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUNORI KATSURA
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIGEO ABE
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUSUKE TANIYAMA
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JIN TESHIMA
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKA WATANABE
3Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIRA SATO
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NORIAKI OHUCHI
1Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIRONOBU SASANO
2Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
3Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has been established as the standard treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, many patients develop persistent or recurrent disease following dCRT. We investigated factors related to chemoradioresistance and treatment outcomes in patients with ESCC who underwent salvage esophagectomy after dCRT. Patients and Methods: We selected 38 patients with persistent disease and 24 with recurrent disease who underwent salvage esophagectomy after dCRT, immunolocalized p53, p16, p27, murine double minute 2 (MDM2), cyclin D1, Ki-67, and epidermal growth factor receptor, and correlated the findings with clinicopathological features. Results: MDM2 positivity was significantly higher among patients with persistent disease than among those with recurrent disease (p<0.0001). In addition, negative p16 expression was a predictor of poor prognosis among patients with persistent disease. Conclusion: MDM2 overexpression plays an important role in chemoradioresistance of ESCC; furthermore, negative p16 expression can predict poor prognosis of patients with persistent disease.

  • Esophagus
  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • definitive chemoradiotherapy
  • salvage esophagectomy
  • murine double minute 2
  • p16
  • Ki-67

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has become the standard treatment for esophageal carcinoma (1-3), and results of some previous studies, including our own, have shown comparable clinical outcomes between patients undergoing dCRT and those undergoing surgery alone (4, 5). However, it is also true that 34.2%-56.0% of patients who undergo dCRT experience persistent or recurrent disease (2, 4-6), which generally results in adverse clinical outcomes. We have aggressively performed salvage esophagectomy after dCRT since October 2001 to improve the chances of survival among these patients (6-9). However, patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy after dCRT still exhibit a high rate of morbidity and mortality (6, 7, 9). If we could determine the chemoradiosensitivity of disease in such patients at the time of diagnosis, we could dramatically improve treatment strategies and clinical outcomes. In addition, if cases with a poor prognosis after salvage esophagectomy could be identified at an earlier clinical stage, much more stringent follow-up and administration of more aggressive adjuvant therapy could also confer clinical benefits to these patients.

Salvage esophagectomy is a rather restricted procedure because of its high-risk nature. To the best of our knowledge, a detailed evaluation of surgical pathology specimens obtained during salvage esophagectomy, following dCRT, has not been previously reported. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) specimens obtained from patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy after dCRT in order to explore the factors related to chemoradioresistance among patients with ESCC. We immunolocalized p53, p16, p27, murine double minute 2 (MDM2), cyclin D1, Ki-67, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) because all of these are known prognostic factors for ESCC and/or are reportedly related to chemoradioresistance (10-16).

Patients and Methods

Patients. We performed 68 salvage esophagectomies following dCRT at the Tohoku University Hospital (Sendai, Japan) between September 2001 and November 2008. Two cases of distant metastasis, three cases of initial endoscopic treatment, and one case of previous CRT for head and neck cancer were excluded. Therefore, 62 patients with ESCC were included in the study, out of whom 38 had persistent disease and 24 had recurrent disease. The definitions of persistent and recurrent disease used in this study are described in the next section.

dCRT and salvage esophagectomy. The dCRT protocol in our study basically followed that of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) trial 9906 (2). In brief, the protocol comprised of two cycles of intravenous cisplatin (40 mg/m2) infusion on days 1 and 8 and continuous 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) infusion over 24 h on days 1-5 and 8-12 every five weeks with concurrent radiotherapy (60 Gy administered in 30 fractions over a period of eight weeks, including a 2-week rest period after the administration of 30 Gy). The radiotherapy administered is three-dimensional. Gross tumour volume (GTV) included the primary tumour and metastatic lymph nodes evaluated by endoscopy, computed tomography (CT), and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET), if necessary. The clinical target volume included the GTV and the supraclavicular, mediastinal, and celiac axis lymph node regions. When the tumours were located in the upper third of the esophagus, the celiac axis lymph node region was excluded. After 40 Gy, an extra boost of radiation was administered to GTV via an oblique approach (20 Gy administered in 10 fractions). Additional chemotherapy was administered until May 2004. This comprised of two cycles of 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 800 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil on days 1-5, every four weeks. Clinical evaluation by endoscopy with biopsy, CT, and FDG-PET (if necessary) were performed one month after treatment completion. Patients who were evaluated as having an incomplete response at this time and who subsequently underwent salvage esophagectomy were defined as persistent cases. Patients who were evaluated as having a complete response (CR) at this time, but whose tumours subsequently recurred in the same location and who underwent salvage esophagectomy later were defined as recurrent cases. Recurrence was confirmed by biopsy. A total of 24 out of the 38 patients with persistent disease and 15 out of the 24 patients with recurrent disease underwent the JCOG 9906 protocol. The other patients underwent treatment according to different protocols followed by other hospitals or other Departments (Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology, or Otolaryngology) of the Tohoku University Hospital. The treatments that the patients received are summarized in Table I. Some patients required a dose decrease or a delay in chemotherapy because of adverse side-effects. All patients received the complete scheduled radiation dose.

Salvage esophagectomy was usually performed under thoracoscopic guidance. One- or two-field lymph node dissection was performed for tumours of the cervical esophagus or the middle or lower thirds of the esophagus, and 3-field lymph node dissection was performed for tumours of the upper third of the esophagus.

Immunohistochemical staining and pathological evaluation. Surgical specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and representative sections were embedded in paraffin wax. Excluding specimens in which no residual tumour cells were observed microscopically, the specimens of 33 patients with persistent disease and 22 patients with recurrent disease were evaluated immunohistochemically. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the streptavidin–biotin complex method, as follows. Serial 4-μm-thick sections from the most representative area of each specimen were de-paraffinized in xylene, rehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and then immersed in 3.0% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min at room temperature (RT) to block endogenous peroxidase activity. For antigen retrieval, the slides for p53 were heated in a microwave at 95°C for 15 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The slides for p16, p27, MDM2, cyclin D1, and Ki-67 were heated for 5 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) using an autoclave at 121°C. The slides for EGFR were incubated in 0.05% protease in Tris-HCL buffer (pH 7.6) at 37°C for 10 min. The slides were incubated in 1% normal rabbit (for mouse monoclonal antibody) or goat (for rabbit monoclonal antibody) serum for 30 min at RT to reduce non-specific antibody binding. Subsequently, the slides were incubated at 4°C overnight with mouse monoclonal antibody against p53 (DO-7, diluted 1/100; Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan), p16 (G175-1239, diluted 1/100; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), p27 (SX53G8, diluted 1/800; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), MDM2 (SMP14 diluted 1/1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., CA, USA), Ki-67 (MIB-1, diluted 1/300; Dako), EGFR (31G7, used as delivered, product code 413701; Nichirei Biosciences Inc.), and rabbit monoclonal antibody against cyclin D1 (SP4, used as delivered, product code 413521; Nichirei Biosciences Inc.). The next day, the sections were incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (Nichirei Biosciences Inc.) as secondary antibodies and incubated with peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (Nichirei Biosciences Inc.) for 30 min at RT. The antigen–antibody complexes were visualized with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine, and the slides were counterstained with Mayer's haematoxylin, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and cleared in xylene.

The staining and pathological findings were evaluated independently by two of the authors (HO and FF) who were blinded to the patients' clinical data. The histopathological findings were classified according to the seventh edition of the Union for International Cancer Control system (17). The percentage of p53-, p27-, MDM2-, Ki-67-, and cyclinD1-positive nuclei was determined for more than three regions of the deepest area of the tumour and 1000 viable tumour cells were evaluated at a magnification of ×400 by microscopy. For p16, the percentage of cells with positive nuclei and positive cytoplasm was determined, and for EGFR, the percentage of cells with positive membranes was determined. The cutoff values for abnormal expression were as follows: p53, ≥10% (13); p16, ≤5% (16); p27, ≥10% (15); MDM2, ≥20% (18); cyclin D1, ≥10% (14); Ki-67, ≥39% (12). Scoring for EGFR was performed using the immunoreactive score (IRS) obtained by multiplying the intensity score (0=no staining, 1=faint staining, 2=moderate staining, 3=strong staining) by the extent score (0=none, 1=<10%, 2=10%-50%, 3=>50%-80%, 4=>80%), and ranged from 1 to 12. It was decided that an IRS ≥6 was indicative of abnormal expression (10). Histopathological tumour regression was classified into five categories according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, tenth edition (19) as follows: grade 3, markedly effective (no viable residual tumour cells); grade 2, moderately effective (less than one-third residual tumour cells); grade 1, slightly effective (1b, one-third to two-thirds residual tumour cells; 1a, more than two-thirds residual tumour cells); grade 0, ineffective (no therapeutic effect observed).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Summary of treatments.

Statistical analysis. Continuous data were analysed using the Student's t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test. Categorical data were evaluated using Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or the Mann–Whitney U-test as appropriate. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Equality of variances was evaluated using the F test. Overall curves were determined by the Kaplan–Meier method, and a log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves. The patient survival time was determined from the date of salvage surgery until death or the last follow-up examination. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro Version 9.0.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Two-tailed p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Tohoku University Hospital (accession number 2011-596).

Results

Comparison of clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between patients with persistent and recurrent disease. The median follow-up time for patients with persistent and recurrent disease was 12.5 months (range=0-102 months) and 34.5 months (range=4-102 months), respectively. Twelve out of 38 patients with persistent disease and three out of 24 patients with recurrent disease underwent non-curative resection (R1/R2). The clinicopathological features of the patients with persistent and recurrent disease are shown in Table II. Pathological tumour depth, lymph node status, and tumour stage were significantly more advanced among patients with persistent disease than among those with recurrent disease. In terms of tumour differentiation, poorly-differentiated tumours were more frequently observed in patients with recurrent disease than in those with persistent disease. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for all 62 patients were 35.1% and 28.0%, respectively. The survival outcomes of patients with persistent and recurrent disease are compared in Figure 1. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 28.2% and 20.6%, respectively, for patients with persistent disease and 45.8% and 41.3%, respectively, for patients with recurrent disease. The OS rate of patients with persistent disease was significantly worse than that of patients with recurrent disease (p=0.044).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Clinicopathological features of patients with persistent and recurrent disease.

Comparison of marker expression between patients with persistent and recurrent disease. Marker expression among the patients with persistent and recurrent disease is summarized in Figure 2. The MDM2 positivity rate (p<0.0001) and the IRS for EGFR (p=0.030) were significantly higher among patients with persistent disease than among those with recurrent disease. On the other hand, the Ki-67 positivity rate tended to be higher among patients with recurrent disease than among those with persistent disease (p=0.062). None of the other markers exhibited any significant correlations with persistent or recurrent disease. Tumour cells positive for MDM2, p16, Ki-67, and EGFR expression are illustrated in Figure 3.

Correlations between marker expression and clinicopathological features. Among the patients with persistent disease, EGFR expression was correlated with advanced pathological stage (p=0.036, data not shown) and lymphatic invasion (p=0.024, data not shown). No other significant correlations were observed.

Survival analysis of clinicopathological findings and marker expression among patients with persistent and recurrent disease. Among patients with persistent disease, survival analysis showed that pathological tumour depth, pathological stage, lymphatic invasion, residual tumour, and p16 status were significant prognostic factors for OS (Table III and Figure 4). Among patients with recurrent disease, pathological tumour depth, pathological stage, lymphatic invasion, and residual tumour were significant prognostic factors for OS (Table III).

Discussion

The oncoprotein MDM2 inhibits p53 by directly blocking its transcriptional activity or ubiquitinating p53 to promote p53 resolution in cytoplasmic proteasomes (20, 21). MDM2 overexpression induced by ionizing radiation inhibits mediation of cell-cycle arrest in the G1 phase and apoptosis by p53 (22, 23), which may explain why some tumours resist radiotherapy or CRT. On the other hand, Ki-67 is a widely known marker of cell proliferation. In this study, tumour MDM2 positivity was significantly higher among patients with persistent disease than among those with recurrent disease. In addition, Ki-67 positivity tended to be higher among those with recurrent disease. Therefore, the biological behaviour of persistent disease appears to differ from that of recurrent disease with regard to resistance to chemoradiation. Persistent disease is usually characterized by marked chemoradioresistance, whereas recurrent disease occurs in patients who have once been evaluated as having a complete clinical response. Considering that tumours with increased resistant to CRT are more frequently identified as persistent rather than recurrent, high levels of MDM2 seem to play a critical role in chemoradioresistance of ESCC cells. Ikeguchi et al. (11) reported that the correlation between MDM2 expression in ESCC and shorter survival was more marked for patients who underwent postoperative adjuvant CRT than for those who did not. These results together with those in our present study clearly indicate that MDM2 expression in ESCCs that display chemoradioresistance is already high before treatment and remains stable or increases after CRT. If this observation is valid, we may be able to determine chemoradiosensitivity in patients with ESCC by examining MDM2 expression in biopsy specimens obtained before treatment, or by examining the increase in MDM2 positivity in biopsy specimens obtained after induction CRT; however, this awaits further investigations for clarification. Recently, the effects of the MDM2 inhibitor Nutlin-3 (24) were clinically evaluated, especially with regard to the treatment of leukemia (25, 26). Nutlin-3 inhibits MDM2 and causes cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence through the accumulation and activation of p53. Arya et al. (27) reported that Nutlin-3 improved the radiosensitivity of laryngeal squamous carcinoma cells. Therefore, CRT in conjunction with Nutlin-3 may contribute to an improvement in response rate among patients with ESCC.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Comparison of survival outcomes between patients with persistent and recurrent disease. Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse among patients with persistent disease than among those with recurrent disease (p=0.044).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Comparison of marker expression between patients with persistent and recurrent disease. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) positivity rate (p<0.0001) and the immunoreactive score of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (p=0.030) were significantly higher among patients with persistent disease than among those with recurrent disease. On the other hand, the Ki-67 positivity rate tended to be higher among patients with recurrent disease than among those with persistent disease (p=0.062). Per., Persistent disease; Rec., recurrent disease.

It appears that recurrent tumour cells have good chemoradiosensitivity but remain in the esophageal wall and regrow in the same location of the esophagus as that of the primary tumour. Considering that the tumours of patients with recurrent disease tend to exhibit high Ki-67 expression, these tumours seem to have a high proliferative capacity. Patients evaluated as having a clinical complete response included those in whom carcinoma cells actually remained in the esophageal wall. Therefore, early detection of recurrence may lead to an improved prognosis. When early-stage recurrence is found, a good prognosis can be expected after salvage esophagectomy, as shown in this study. Moreover, endoscopic treatment can be considered to preserve the esophagus.

Regarding EGFR, IRS was significantly higher in patients with persistent disease than in patients with recurrent disease. This may be because the pathological stage of tumours was significantly more advanced in patients with persistent disease than in those with recurrent disease and because EGFR expression was correlated with advanced pathological stage among patients with persistent disease.

p16 is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (28). Inactivation of p16 has been observed in several human malignancies, including ESCC (29, 30). In this study, p16 expression was significantly correlated with the survival of patients with persistent disease. Although R0 resection contributes to survival after salvage esophagectomy (7, 9), this finding suggests that patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy for tumours with low p16 expression may clinically benefit from stricter perioperative management, aggressive adjuvant therapy, and careful follow-up. In the present study, p16 expression was evaluated only after dCRT. Therefore, the expression of this marker in pretreatment biopsy specimens remains to be evaluated.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Immunohistochemical staining of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Tumour cells positive for murine double minute 2 (A), p16 (B), Ki-67 (C), and epidermal growth factor receptor (D) expression (×400 magnification).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Kaplan–Meier curves of patients prepared on the basis of p16 expression Among patients with persistent disease, overall survival was significantly shorter in those with negative p16 expression than in those with positive p16 expression (A); however, no statistically significant differences were observed in survival according to p16 status among patients with recurrent disease (B).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Survival analysis of clinicopathological findings and marker expression among patients with persistent and recurrent disease.

A positive correlation between tumour regression grading (TRG) and ESCC prognosis has been reported (13), but no correlation between TRG (0/1a vs. 1b/2) and patient survival was detected in this study. The period from dCRT to salvage esophagectomy varied among patients, and only three specimens from patients with persistent disease were TRG2. Moreover, TRG3 specimens were excluded. We believe this to be the reason why TRG was not necessarily correlated with survival in this study. Further investigation of ESCC specimens obtained after neoadjuvant CRT in patients with a fixed interval between chemoradiotherapy and surgery is required.

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to undertake a detailed evaluation of surgical pathology specimens obtained during salvage esophagectomy following dCRT. Our findings indicate that overexpression of MDM2 plays an important role in the chemoradioresistance of ESCC cells and that low or lack of p16 expression has the potential to predict poor prognosis among patients with persistent disease after dCRT. We believe that these results and those of further investigations will contribute to the development of a new treatment strategy for ESCC.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Ms. Yasuko Furukawa, Ms. Yayoi Takahashi, and Ms. Ryoko Sato for their excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interests

    The Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  • Received January 18, 2013.
  • Revision received February 20, 2013.
  • Accepted February 21, 2013.
  • Copyright© 2013 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Cooper JS,
    2. Guo MD,
    3. Herskovic A,
    4. Macdonald JS,
    5. Martenson JA Jr..,
    6. Al-Sarraf M,
    7. Byhardt R,
    8. Russell AH,
    9. Beitler JJ,
    10. Spencer S,
    11. Asbell SO,
    12. Graham MV,
    13. Leichman LL
    : Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA 281: 1623-1627, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Kato K,
    2. Muro K,
    3. Minashi K,
    4. Ohtsu A,
    5. Ishikura S,
    6. Boku N,
    7. Takiuchi H,
    8. Komatsu Y,
    9. Miyata Y,
    10. Fukuda H
    : Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81: 684-690, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ohtsu A,
    2. Boku N,
    3. Muro K,
    4. Chin K,
    5. Muto M,
    6. Yoshida S,
    7. Satake M,
    8. Ishikura S,
    9. Ogino T,
    10. Miyata Y,
    11. Seki S,
    12. Kaneko K,
    13. Nakamura A
    : Definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 and/or M1 lymph node squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 17: 2915-2921, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Ariga H,
    2. Nemoto K,
    3. Miyazaki S,
    4. Yoshioka T,
    5. Ogawa Y,
    6. Sakayauchi T,
    7. Jingu K,
    8. Miyata G,
    9. Onodera K,
    10. Ichikawa H,
    11. Kamei T,
    12. Kato S,
    13. Ishioka C,
    14. Satomi S,
    15. Yamada S
    : Prospective comparison of surgery alone and chemoradiotherapy with selective surgery in resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75: 348-356, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Hironaka S,
    2. Ohtsu A,
    3. Boku N,
    4. Muto M,
    5. Nagashima F,
    6. Saito H,
    7. Yoshida S,
    8. Nishimura M,
    9. Haruno M,
    10. Ishikura S,
    11. Ogino T,
    12. Yamamoto S,
    13. Ochiai A
    : Nonrandomized comparison between definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with T(2-3)N(any) M(0) squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57: 425-433, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chao YK,
    2. Chan SC,
    3. Chang HK,
    4. Liu YH,
    5. Wu YC,
    6. Hsieh MJ,
    7. Tseng CK,
    8. Liu HP
    : Salvage surgery after failed chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Eur J Surg Oncol 35: 289-294, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Gardner-Thorpe J,
    2. Hardwick RH,
    3. Dwerryhouse SJ
    : Salvage oesophagectomy after local failure of definitive chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 94: 1059-1066, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liao Z,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Jin J,
    4. Ajani JA,
    5. Swisher SG,
    6. Stevens CW,
    7. Ho L,
    8. Smythe R,
    9. Vaporciyan AA,
    10. Putnam JB Jr..,
    11. Walsh GL,
    12. Roth JA,
    13. Yao JC,
    14. Allen PK,
    15. Cox JD,
    16. Komaki R
    : Esophagectomy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves locoregional control in clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60: 1484-1493, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tachimori Y,
    2. Kanamori N,
    3. Uemura N,
    4. Hokamura N,
    5. Igaki H,
    6. Kato H
    : Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137: 49-54, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Gibson MK,
    2. Abraham SC,
    3. Wu TT,
    4. Burtness B,
    5. Heitmiller RF,
    6. Heath E,
    7. Forastiere A
    : Epidermal growth factor receptor, p53 mutation, and pathological response predict survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 9: 6461-6468, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Ikeguchi M,
    2. Ueda T,
    3. Fukuda K,
    4. Yamaguchi K,
    5. Tsujitani S,
    6. Kaibara N
    : Expression of the murine double minute gene 2 oncoprotein in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma as a novel marker for lack of response to chemoradiotreatment. Am J Clin Oncol 25: 454-459, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Imdahl A,
    2. Jenkner J,
    3. Ihling C,
    4. Ruckauer K,
    5. Farthmann EH
    : Is MIB-1 proliferation index a predictor for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer? Am J Surg 179: 514-520, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Okumura H,
    2. Natsugoe S,
    3. Matsumoto M,
    4. Mataki Y,
    5. Takatori H,
    6. Ishigami S,
    7. Takao S,
    8. Aikou T
    : The predictive value of p53, p53R2, and p21 for the effect of chemoradiation therapy on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 92: 284-289, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Research Committee on Malignancy of Esophageal Cancer Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases
    : Prognostic significance of cyclin D1 and E-cadherin in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: multiinstitutional retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Surg 192: 708-718, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Shiozaki H,
    2. Doki Y,
    3. Kawanishi K,
    4. Shamma A,
    5. Yano M,
    6. Inoue M,
    7. Monden M
    : Clinical application of malignancy potential grading as a prognostic factor of human esophageal cancers. Surgery 127: 552-561, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Taghavi N,
    2. Biramijamal F,
    3. Sotoudeh M,
    4. Khademi H,
    5. Malekzadeh R,
    6. Moaven O,
    7. Memar B,
    8. A'Rabi A,
    9. Abbaszadegan MR
    : p16INK4A hypermethylation and p53, p16 and MDM2 protein expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 10: 138, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Gospodarowicz MK,
    3. Wittekind C
    1. Wittekind C,
    2. Yamasaki S
    : Oesophagus including oesophagogastric junction. In: International Union Against Cancer TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds.). New York, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 66-72, 2009.
  17. ↵
    1. Osman I,
    2. Sherman E,
    3. Singh B,
    4. Venkatraman E,
    5. Zelefsky M,
    6. Bosl G,
    7. Scher H,
    8. Shah J,
    9. Shaha A,
    10. Kraus D,
    11. Cordon-Cardo C,
    12. Pfister DG
    : Alteration of p53 pathway in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Impact on treatment outcome in patients treated with larynx preservation intent. J Clin Oncol 20: 2980-2987, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Japan Esophageal Society
    : Japanease Classification of Esophageal Cancer, Tenth Edition: parts II and III. Esophagus 6: 71-94, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Honda R,
    2. Tanaka H,
    3. Yasuda H
    : Oncoprotein MDM2 is a ubiquitin ligase E3 for tumor suppressor p53. FEBS Lett 420: 25-27, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Momand J,
    2. Zambetti GP,
    3. Olson DC,
    4. George D,
    5. Levine AJ
    : The MDM-2 oncogene product forms a complex with the p53 protein and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation. Cell 69: 1237-1245, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Chen CY,
    2. Oliner JD,
    3. Zhan Q,
    4. Fornace AJ Jr..,
    5. Vogelstein B,
    6. Kastan MB
    : Interactions between p53 and MDM2 in a mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 2684-2688, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Perry ME
    : Mdm2 in the response to radiation. Mol Cancer Res 2: 9-19, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Vassilev LT,
    2. Vu BT,
    3. Graves B,
    4. Carvajal D,
    5. Podlaski F,
    6. Filipovic Z,
    7. Kong N,
    8. Kammlott U,
    9. Lukacs C,
    10. Klein C,
    11. Fotouhi N,
    12. Liu EA
    : In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 303: 844-848, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Drakos E,
    2. Singh RR,
    3. Rassidakis GZ,
    4. Schlette E,
    5. Li J,
    6. Claret FX,
    7. Ford RJ Jr..,
    8. Vega F,
    9. Medeiros LJ
    : Activation of the p53 pathway by the MDM2 inhibitor Nutlin-3a overcomes BCL2 overexpression in a preclinical model of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma associated with t(14;18)(q32;q21). Leukemia 25: 856-867, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Kojima K,
    2. Konopleva M,
    3. McQueen T,
    4. O'Brien S,
    5. Plunkett W,
    6. Andreeff M
    : MDM2 inhibitor Nutlin-3a induces p53-mediated apoptosis by transcription-dependent and transcription-independent mechanisms and may overcome ATM-mediated resistance to fludarabine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 108: 993-1000, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Arya AK,
    2. El-Fert A,
    3. Devling T,
    4. Eccles RM,
    5. Aslam MA,
    6. Rubbi CP,
    7. Vlatkovic N,
    8. Fenwick J,
    9. Lloyd BH,
    10. Sibson DR,
    11. Jones TM,
    12. Boyd MT
    : Nutlin-3, the small-molecule inhibitor of MDM2, promotes senescence and radiosensitises laryngeal carcinoma cells harbouring wild-type p53. Br J Cancer 103: 186-195, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Serrano M,
    2. Hannon GJ,
    3. Beach D
    : A new regulatory motif in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4. Nature 366: 704-707, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Kwong FM,
    2. Tang JC,
    3. Srivastava G,
    4. Lung ML
    : Inactivation mechanisms and growth suppressive effects of p16INK4A in Asian esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Lett 208: 207-213, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Merlo A,
    2. Herman JG,
    3. Mao L,
    4. Lee DJ,
    5. Gabrielson E,
    6. Burger PC,
    7. Baylin SB,
    8. Sidransky D
    : 5’ CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat Med 1: 686-692, 1995. Received January 18, 2013 Revised February 20, 2013 Accepted February 21, 2013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 33 (4)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 4
April 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Murine Double Minute 2 and Its Association with Chemoradioresistance of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Murine Double Minute 2 and Its Association with Chemoradioresistance of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
HIROSHI OKAMOTO, FUMIYOSHI FUJISHIMA, YASUHIRO NAKAMURA, MASASHI ZUGUCHI, GO MIYATA, TAKASHI KAMEI, TORU NAKANO, KAZUNORI KATSURA, SHIGEO ABE, YUSUKE TANIYAMA, JIN TESHIMA, MIKA WATANABE, AKIRA SATO, NORIAKI OHUCHI, HIRONOBU SASANO
Anticancer Research Apr 2013, 33 (4) 1463-1471;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Murine Double Minute 2 and Its Association with Chemoradioresistance of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
HIROSHI OKAMOTO, FUMIYOSHI FUJISHIMA, YASUHIRO NAKAMURA, MASASHI ZUGUCHI, GO MIYATA, TAKASHI KAMEI, TORU NAKANO, KAZUNORI KATSURA, SHIGEO ABE, YUSUKE TANIYAMA, JIN TESHIMA, MIKA WATANABE, AKIRA SATO, NORIAKI OHUCHI, HIRONOBU SASANO
Anticancer Research Apr 2013, 33 (4) 1463-1471;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MDM2 Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy: The Past, Present, and Future
  • Murine Double Minute 2 Antagonist Nutlin-3 Enhanced Chemosensitivity in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Inhibition of human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by targeted silencing of tumor enhancer genes: an overview
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cytotoxic and Metalloproteinase-inhibitory Effects of Ellagic Acid Against Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Artogomezianone Inhibits EGFR and Promotes Apoptosis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells
  • Resveratrol Derivatives Inhibit Pro-survival Akt Signaling Pathway in Lung Cancer
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Esophagus
  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • definitive chemoradiotherapy
  • Salvage esophagectomy
  • murine double minute 2
  • p16
  • Ki-67
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire