Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Genetically-engineered Human Neural Stem Cells with Rabbit Carboxyl Esterase Can Target CNS Lymphoma

WONYOUNG KANG, JUYOUN JIN, HEEKYOUNG YANG, HO JUN SEOL, KANG HO KIM, JUNG-II LEE, SEUNG U. KIM, KYEUNG MIN JOO and DO-HYUN NAM
Anticancer Research December 2013, 33 (12) 5335-5342;
WONYOUNG KANG
1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
2Cancer Stem Cell Research Center, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
3Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUYOUN JIN
1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
2Cancer Stem Cell Research Center, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HEEKYOUNG YANG
1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
2Cancer Stem Cell Research Center, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HO JUN SEOL
1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KANG HO KIM
1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
2Cancer Stem Cell Research Center, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUNG-II LEE
1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SEUNG U. KIM
6Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
7Medical Research Institute, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KYEUNG MIN JOO
2Cancer Stem Cell Research Center, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
3Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
4Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
5Centre for Molecular Medicine, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Suwon, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nsnam{at}skku.edu kmjoo{at}skku.edu
DO-HYUN NAM
1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
2Cancer Stem Cell Research Center, Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
3Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Samsung Medical Center and Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nsnam{at}skku.edu kmjoo{at}skku.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in its treatment, CNS lymphoma remains a devastating disease. Taking advantage of the tumour-tropic properties of neural stem cells (NSCs) is a novel therapeutic strategy. To apply this strategy to the treatment of CNS lymphoma, we investigated the role of NSCs expressing carboxyl esterase (HB1.F3.CE), which activates irinotecan. Materials and Methods: In order to find in vitro bystander effects of engineered NSCs, we performed cell viability assays. In vivo, the HB1.F3.CE cells were injected into the brain of mice with orthotopic CNS lymphoma. Mice were then treated with irinotecan by systemic administration. Results: The HB1.F3.CE cells significantly inhibited the growth of Raji cells with irinotecan treatment. In vivo, the HB1.F3.CE cells migrated into the tumour and significantly reduced tumour volume. In addition, survival of mice was prolonged by treatment with HB1.F3.CE and irinotecan. Conclusion: Transplantation of human NSCs encoding CE into brain, combined with irinotecan therapy, may be an effective treatment regimen for CNS lymphoma.

  • Irinotecan
  • carboxyl esterase (CE)
  • CNS lymphoma
  • neural stem cells
  • rabbit

The current primary therapeutic option for central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is chemotherapy with intravenous high-dose methotrexate (1-3), and this treatment leads to durable remissions in some patients. However, tumour relapse occurs in most cases, and the overall and progression-free survival range from 14 to 55 months and 6 to 10 months, respectively (4). Although temozolomide, etoposide, ifosfamide, rituximab, and stem cell transplantation have been tried as salvage treatment, irinotecan is one of the most promising options since it has an excellent CNS penetration (5-7). Unfortunately, despite high response rates in phase II studies against a broad range of solid tumour types, irinotecan has not been used to treat malignant lymphoma, mainly due to its common severe side-effects of leucopenia and diarrhea even at normal treatment doses (8).

Carboxyl esterase (CE) is mainly expressed in the liver. It hydrolyzes and activates the pro-drug irinotecan to produce an anti-neoplastic topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38) (9, 10). Selective expression of CE in tumour could achieve the same therapeutic effects but at lower systemic concentrations of toxic SN-38, thus reducing the undesirable side-effects of irinotecan. The recent discovery of the inherent tumour-tropic properties of neural stem cells (NSCs) potentially provides a novel approach to target therapeutic gene products specifically to multiple tumour sites and invasive tumour cells in the CNS (11). In the present study, we established the proof-of-concept that CNS lymphoma can be effectively targeted by NSCs expressing CE (HB1.F3.CE cells) and demonstrated the therapeutic value of transplantation of HB1.F3.CE cells and systemic injection of irinotecan in a mouse model of CNS lymphoma.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture. HB1.F3, immortalized human fetal NSCs, and HB1.F3 cells producing rabbit CE (HB1.F3.CE) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mmol/l L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/ml amphotericin B (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), which is hereafter referred to as 10% DMEM. Raji human Burkitt lymphoma cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were grown in RPMI-1640 (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mmol/l L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/ml amphotericin B (Invitrogen).

Genetic engineering of the human NSC line HB1.F3.CE. HB1.F3 cell line was prepared as described previously (12, 13). The clonal HB1.F3.CE cell line was constructed from the parental HB1.F3 line as described previously (13-15). Briefly, an expression plasmid encoding rabbit CE was constructed and transduced into HB1.F3 cells using a retroviral system. Successful transduction of the HB1.F3.CE cells was confirmed by reverse transcription–PCR using the following primer pair: sense, 5’-TGCTGGGCTATC CACTCTCT-3’; antisense, 5’-CTCCAGCATCTCTGTGGTGA-3’ (13). To confirm the activity of CE in HB1.F3.CE cells, 1×104 HB1.F3, HB1.F3.CE or Raji cells were plated in 96-well plates. Twenty-four hours after seeding, 0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 μg/ml irinotecan (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was applied for 48 h. The status of the cells was then analyzed using a microscope, and viability was determined with a colorimetric assay (Cell Counting Kit-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA).

In vitro experiments of the bystander effect. Raji and HB1.F3 or HB1.F3.CE cells in 10% DMEM were seeded in 96-well plates (total 1×104 cells per well; Raji cells:HB1.F3 or HB1.F3.CE cells =75:25, 50:50, 25:75, or 0:100). Irinotecan (1 μg/ml) was added to the mixed cell cultures 24 h after seeding for 48 h, and cell viability was determined as described above. The relative survivals of Raji and HB1.F3.CE co-cultures were compared to the survival of Raji and HB1.F3 co-cultures (set to 100%) for each ratio. To rule out the direct effects of HB1.F3.CE and HB1.F3 cells on the survival of tumour cells, conditioned media were prepared (HB1.F3.CE and HB1.F3 conditioned media, respectively) as follows: 1×106 HB1.F3 or HB1.F3.CE cells in 10% DMEM were seeded in a T-75 flask. On the next day, 1 μg/ml irinotecan was applied followed by incubation for 48 h. Conditioned media from HB1.F3 and HB1.F3.CE cells were then obtained by filtration (0.2 μm). Raji cells were treated with conditioned media (50%, 25%, 12.5%, and 0%) from HB1.F3 or HB1.F3.CE cells for 48 h. The relative survival of Raji cells supplemented with conditioned media (set at 100%) was compared at each ratio.

Animal model of CNS lymphoma. Animal experiments in this study were reviewed and approved (no: C-A7-210-3) by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Samsung Biomedical Research Institute (SBRI). Anesthetized BALB/c-nu mice (6- to 7-week-old males) were secured in a rodent stereotactic frame, and a hollow guide screw was implanted into a small drill hole made 2 mm left and 1 mm anterior to the bregma. Raji cells [5×105 in 5 μl Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS)] were injected through this guide screw into the white matter at a depth of 2 mm [anterior/posterior (AP) +1.0 mm, medial/lateral (ML) +1.7 mm, dorsal/ventral (DV) −3.2 mm].

In vivo analysis of tumour-tropism of human NSCs. HB1.F3.CE cells were labelled with PKH26, red fluorescent dye for staining of cell membranes, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Seven days after tumour cell injection, 1×105 PKH26-labelled HB1.F3.CE cells in 5 μl HBSS were stereotactically implanted into the contralateral hemisphere (AP +1.0 mm, ML -1.7 mm, DV −3.2 mm).

Forty-eight hours after the HB1.F3.CE cell injection, the animals were anaesthetized, and perfusion fixation was performed by transcardially perfusing ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The brains of the animals were immediately removed, post-fixed in the same fixative overnight, and processed for frozen embedding using standard experimental procedures. The frozen blocks were cut into 8-μm coronal sections. Nuclei were counterstained with 0.001% 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in PBS.

In vivo therapeutic efficacy of HB1.F3.CE cells. Seven days after Raji cell injection, animals were subjected to contralateral injection (AP +1.0 mm, ML −1.7 mm, DV −3.2 mm) of 5 μl HBSS (control and irinotecan, each group n=5) or 1×105 HB1.F3.CE cells in 5 μl HBSS (each group n=5). Forty-eight hours after the NSC injection, the control and the HB1.F3.CE groups received intravenous injections of normal saline (100 μl), while the other two groups received irinotecan (3.75 mg/kg in 100 μl normal saline) every day for five days. Five days after the last irinotecan injection, brains were removed and cut into 4-6 mm thick coronal slices. The brain slices were fixed in 10% formalin/PBS, embedded in paraffin, sectioned into 4-μm sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Tumour volumes were measured in the sections with the largest width using the formula, largest width2 × largest length ×0.5. For survival analysis, seven mice of each group were treated as described above. Weight loss >25% of maximal body weight was regarded as mortality.

Statistical analysis. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Student's t-test. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests. p-Values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

HB1.F3.CE–a human NSC line expressing CE. HB1.F3 and HB1.F3.CE cells of the same passage and stock as in our previous research (13) were utilized in this study. We reconfirmed the detection of the CE transcript in HB1.F3.CE cells but not in HB1.F3 cells (data not shown). The sensitivity of HB1.F3.CE cells to irinotecan was compared to that of parental HB1.F3 and Raji human Burkitt lymphoma cells. While 1 μg/ml irinotecan had no significant effect on the survival of HB1.F3 or Raji cells (Figure 1A), the survival of HB1.F3.CE cells was dramatically reduced by 48-h exposure to irinotecan at a concentration <1 μg/ml.

In vitro bystander effects in HB1.F3.CE cells. In vitro bystander effects in HB1.F3.CE cells were determined using a co-culture system to compare between the conditioned medium from HB1.F3.CE cells and that from parental HB1.F3 cells. No toxic effects of irinotecan (1 μg/ml) were observed when Raji cells were co-cultured with parental HB1.F3 cells (Figure 1B). In contrast, the survival of Raji cells co-cultured with HB1.F3.CE cells (Raji cells:HB1.F3.CE cells=75:25, 50:50, or 25:75) was significantly reduced by 48-h exposure to 1 μg/ml irinotecan (p<0.05, Figure 1B). In the absence of irinotecan, the survival of Raji cells co-cultured with HB1.F3 or HB1.F3.CE cells was not affected (data not shown).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Sensitivity of HB1.F3.CE cells to irinotecan. A: HB1.F3 and HB1.F3.CE cells (1×104) were cultured under different concentrations of irinotecan at 37°C for 48 h. Relative survival was determined and compared. *p<0.05 vs. Raji cells; #p<0.05 vs. HB1.F3 cells. B: The bystander effect of carboxyl esterase (CE) produced by HB1.F3.CE cells was confirmed using a co-culture system. Raji cells co-cultured with HB1.F3 or HB1.F3.CE cells were seeded in 96-well plates (total 1×104 cells per well; Raji cells:HB1.F3 or HB1.F3.CE cells = 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, or 0:100). After 48 h in co-culture, cells were treated with 1.0 μg/ml irinotecan for 48 h and cell survival was determined (each group, n=3). *p<0.05. C: Raji cells (1×104) were seeded in 96-well plates. After 24 h, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, or 0% of conditioned media from HB1.F3 and HB1.F3.CE cells were added for 48 h. The relative survival of Raji cells was determined (each group, n=3). *p<0.05.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Migration of HB1.F3.CE cells toward intracranial lymphoma. A: Timeline for the migration study of HB1.F3.CE cells. Seven days after Raji tumour cell implantation, PKH26-labelled HB1.F3.CE cells were inoculated into the contralateral hemisphere. B: HB1.F3.CE cells migrated away from the initial injection site and targeted the tumour. Red=PKH26-positive cells, Blue=4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Original magnification, ×400.

To rule out the direct effects of HB1.F3.CE and HB1.F3 cells on the survival of Raji tumour cells, conditioned media were prepared by filtering media from HB1.F3.CE or HB1.F3 cells treated with 1 μg/ml irinotecan for 48 h. Raji cells were then treated with either 12.5%, 25%, or 50% of the conditioned medium for 48 h. The survival of Raji cells was significantly inhibited by HB1.F3.CE-conditioned media compared to HB1.F3-conditioned media (p<0.05, Figure 1C). These results indicate that HB1.F3.CE cells activated sufficient amounts of irinotecan to effectively kill Raji cells in vitro.

In vivo tumour-tropic property of HB1.F3.CE cells. We recently established an animal model of CNS lymphoma by stereotactically injecting Raji cells into the brains of immunocompromised mice, producing huge infiltrative intracerebral tumours several weeks after the injection. Specific pathological characteristics of CNS lymphoma, such as extensive leptomeningeal seeding, have been described (16). Seven days after stereotactic implantation of 5×105 Raji cells into immune-deficient mouse brains, 1×105 PKH26-labelled HB1.F3.CE cells were injected stereotactically into the contralateral brain hemispheres. The distribution of HB1.F3.CE cells was determined two days after HB1.F3.CE cell injection (Figure 2A). PKH26-positive HB1.F3.CE cells were identified in the tumour core, while few HB1.F3.CE cells were found in the injected hemisphere or in brain areas without tumour (Figure 2B), confirming the in vivo tumour-tropic activity of HB1.F3.CE cells.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Treatment with HB1.F3.CE cells and irinotecan has a significant therapeutic effect in vivo. A: Timeline for the establishment of an animal model of CNS lymphoma and subsequent treatment using HB1.F3.CE cells and irinotecan. B: Compared with to other groups, mice treated with HB1.F3.CE cells and irinotecan (IRI) had significantly smaller tumour volumes (n=5 per each group).*p<0.05. Column=mean; bar=SE; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution; i.c., intracranial; i.v., intravenous. C: Representative images of brain slices from each group.

In vivo therapeutic efficacy of HB1.F3.CE cells. The in vivo therapeutic efficacy of HB1.F3.CE cells against CNS lymphoma was independently assayed by tumour volume measurement and survival analysis. Seven days after stereotactic implantation of 5×105 Raji cells into the brains of immune-deficient mice, animals were subjected to contralateral injection of 5 μl HBSS or 1×105 HB1.F3.CE cells in 5 μl HBSS. Forty-eight hours after the NSC injection, the control and HB1.F3.CE groups received intravenous injections of normal saline, while the other two groups received intravenous injections of irinotecan (3.75 mg/kg) every day for five days. When tumour volumes were determined in the brain tissue at five days after the last irinotecan injection (Figure 3A), tumour volumes in the brains of the HB1.F3.CE/irinotecan group were significantly reduced (Figure 3B and C) compared with those in the control (p=0.008), HB1.F3.CE (p=0.03) and irinotecan group (p=0.01). The tumour volumes in the HB1.F3.CE/irinotecan group were reduced by up to 60% compared to those in the control group.

The therapeutic effects of HB1.F3.CE cells against CNS lymphoma were confirmed by survival analysis (Figure 4A), using the same treatment schedule and groups as those utilized for the tumour volume analysis (n=7 per each group). The HB1.F3.CE/irinotecan group had a significantly prolonged survival period (Figure 4B, mean±SD=21.1±1.3 days, p=0.0001) compared with the other groups (control=16.2±2.7 days, HB1.F3.CE group=16.6±2.3 days, irinotecan group=17.6±0.5 days), confirming the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of HB1.F3.CE cells against CNS lymphoma.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Survival analysis to investigate the effects of HB1.F3.CE and irinotecan. A: Timeline for the survival analysis. i.c., Intracranial; i.v., intravenous; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution. B: The Kaplan–Meier graph shows a significantly prolonged survival period in the HB1.F3.CE/irinotecan (IRI) group compared to the other groups (n=7 per each group), *p<0.05.

Discussion

CNS lymphoma is an aggressive malignancy arising exclusively in the CNS. This type of lymphoma represents 4% of intracranial neoplasms and 4-6% of all extranodal lymphomas (17). Some registry studies suggest that the incidence of CNS lymphoma in immunocompetent patients is progressively increasing (18). Despite advances in chemotherapeutic modalities, a high relapse rate (approximately 70%) and leptomeningeal seeding (7-42%) after standard chemotherapies, including intrathecal methotrexate, are major concerns for this disease (19, 20). The lack of benefit of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone/prednisolone (CHOP) therapy, which is a traditional treatment regimen for lymphomas, has also been reported (21). It has been suggested that relapse of CNS lymphoma even after high-dose methotrexate in addition to standard chemotherapy is mainly due to restoration of the blood–brain barrier, which impairs the penetration of chemotherapeutic agents into the CNS. Even though other drugs, such as cytarabine and rituximab, have been suggested for primary or salvage therapy, the treatment efficacy and side-effects need to be further elucidated (22). A more tumour-specific targeted approach in CNS lymphoma may, therefore, provide a much needed advantage over the standard systemic drugs.

Recent studies have found that immortalized and genetically-engineered NSCs display tumor-tropic activities that can be exploited for tumour-specific gene therapy for the treatment of brain tumours (23, 24). CE-producing NSCs (HB1.F3.CE), which selectively convert the pro-drug irinotecan to SN-38, have been shown to migrate towards tumour cells and have therapeutic effects on the tumours (9, 10, 13, 25, 26). Irinotecan itself has excellent CNS penetration. However, in CNS lymphoma, a much higher systemic dose is required to achieve a therapeutic concentration in the brain, leading to a concomitant increase in undesirable side-effects, such as severe diarrhea, neutropenia, and hepatotoxicity (27-29). Selective targeting by NSCs is therefore a promising approach to overcome these limitations, since increases in the intracranial or intratumoural concentration of irinotecan and SN-38 for treatment of CNS lymphoma can be achieved even using a relatively lower systemic dose of irinotecan.

Our data demonstrate that the intra-cerebral implantation of Raji cells into immune- compromised mouse brains provides an animal model that closely mimics the pathological characteristics of human CNS lymphoma (30). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that NSCs carrying a suicide gene have therapeutic effects in CNS lymphoma. The NSCs carrying the suicide gene (HB1.F3.CE) migrated to the contralateral tumour site, and a significant reduction in the tumour volume and increase in survival outcome was observed in the xenograft animal model. However, it is important to point out that our xenograft model using immune-deficient mice has limitations in representing real CNS lymphoma. For example, it limits the opportunity to examine the key role of the immune system. In addition, clinical application of this NSC therapy will require further testing in terms of safety for use of NSCs, the route of administration, the required cell number, and possible immune-rejection (31, 32). The human NSC line used in this study was immortalized by v-myc (33, 34) and the possibility of tumour formation by the v-myc oncogene in the HB1.F3 human NSCs cannot be excluded.

To the best of our knowledge, no studies regarding CNS lymphoma-targeting therapies using an NSC-based approach have been published thus far. Our results demonstrate for the first time that brain transplantation of human NSCs encoding the suicide enzyme CE, combined with systemic administration of irinotecan, may be an effective treatment regimen for CNS lymphoma.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A092255 and A120446).

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Received September 26, 2013.
  • Revision received October 25, 2013.
  • Accepted October 29, 2013.
  • Copyright© 2013 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Herrlinger U,
    2. Kuker W,
    3. Uhl M,
    4. Blaicher HP,
    5. Karnath HO,
    6. Kanz L,
    7. Bamberg M,
    8. Weller M
    : NOA-03 trial of high-dose methotrexate in primary central nervous system lymphoma: Final report. Ann Neurol 57: 843-847, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Abrey LE,
    2. Yahalom J,
    3. DeAngelis LM
    : Treatment for primary CNS lymphoma: The next step. J Clin Oncol 18: 3144-3150, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. DeAngelis LM,
    2. Seiferheld W,
    3. Schold SC,
    4. Fisher B,
    5. Schultz CJ
    : Combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93-10. J Clin Oncol 20: 4643-4648, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Gerstner ER,
    2. Batchelor TT
    : Primary central nervous system lymphoma. Arch Neurol 67: 291-297.
  4. ↵
    1. Bass AJ,
    2. Gockerman JP,
    3. Hammett E,
    4. DeCastro CM,
    5. Adams DJ,
    6. Rosner GL,
    7. Payne N,
    8. Davis P,
    9. Foster T,
    10. Moore JO,
    11. Rizzieri DA
    : Phase I evaluation of prolonged-infusion gemcitabine with irinotecan for relapsed or refractory leukemia or lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 20: 2995-3000, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sugiyama K,
    2. Omachi K,
    3. Fujiwara K,
    4. Saotome T,
    5. Mizunuma N,
    6. Takahashi S,
    7. Ito Y,
    8. Aiba K,
    9. Horikoshi N
    : Irinotecan hydrochloride for the treatment of recurrent and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A single institution experience. Cancer 94: 594-600, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Niitsu N,
    2. Iijima K,
    3. Chizuka A
    : Combination therapy with irinotecan (CPT-11), mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A pilot study. Ann Hematol 80: 411-416, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Numbenjapon T,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Colcher D,
    4. Schluep T,
    5. Davis ME,
    6. Duringer J,
    7. Kretzner L,
    8. Yen Y,
    9. Forman SJ,
    10. Raubitschek A
    : Preclinical results of camptothecin-polymer conjugate (IT-101) in multiple human lymphoma xenograft models. Clin Cancer Res 15: 4365-4373, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Gutova M,
    2. Najbauer J,
    3. Chen MY,
    4. Potter PM,
    5. Kim SU,
    6. Aboody KS
    : Therapeutic targeting of melanoma cells using neural stem cells expressing carboxylesterase, a CPT-11 activating enzyme. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 5: 273-276, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kim KY,
    2. Kim SU,
    3. Leung PC,
    4. Jeung EB,
    5. Choi KC
    : Influence of the prodrugs 5-fluorocytosine and CPT-11 on ovarian cancer cells using genetically engineered stem cells: tumor-tropic potential and inhibition of ovarian cancer cell growth. Cancer Sci 101: 955-962, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Schmidt NO,
    2. Przylecki W,
    3. Yang W,
    4. Ziu M,
    5. Teng Y,
    6. Kim SU,
    7. Black PM,
    8. Aboody KS,
    9. Carroll RS
    : Brain tumor tropism of transplanted human neural stem cells is induced by vascular endothelial growth factor. Neoplasia 7: 623-629, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lee HJ,
    2. Kim KS,
    3. Kim EJ,
    4. Choi HB,
    5. Lee KH,
    6. Park IH,
    7. Ko Y,
    8. Jeong SW,
    9. Kim SU
    : Brain transplantation of immortalized human neural stem cells promotes functional recovery in mouse intracerebral hemorrhage stroke model. Stem Cells 25: 1204-1212, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Seol HJ,
    2. Jin J,
    3. Seong DH,
    4. Joo KM,
    5. Kang W,
    6. Yang H,
    7. Kim J,
    8. Shin CS,
    9. Kim Y,
    10. Kim KH,
    11. Kong DS,
    12. Lee JI,
    13. Aboody KS,
    14. Lee HJ,
    15. Kim SU,
    16. Nam DH
    : Genetically engineered human neural stem cells with rabbit carboxyl esterase can target brain metastasis from breast cancer. Cancer Lett 311: 152-159, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Aboody KS,
    2. Brown A,
    3. Rainov NG,
    4. Bower KA,
    5. Liu S,
    6. Yang W,
    7. Small JE,
    8. Herrlinger U,
    9. Ourednik V,
    10. Black PM,
    11. Breakefield XO,
    12. Snyder EY
    : Neural stem cells display extensive tropism for pathology in adult brain: Evidence from intracranial gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 12846-12851, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Potter PM,
    2. Pawlik CA,
    3. Morton CL,
    4. Naeve CW,
    5. Danks MK
    : Isolation and partial characterization of a cDNA encoding a rabbit liver carboxylesterase that activates the prodrug irinotecan (CPT-11). Cancer Res 58: 2646-2651, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Jin J,
    2. Joo KM,
    3. Nam Y,
    4. Kim DH,
    5. Lee SJ,
    6. Jo MY,
    7. Jin Y,
    8. Kim HS,
    9. Seo SW,
    10. Kim SJ,
    11. Nam DH,
    12. Kim WS
    : Schedule-dependent synergistic effect of rituximab on methotrexate chemotherapy against lymphoma of the central nervous system. Exp Ther Med 1: 943-946, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Muzaffar S,
    2. Siddiqui MS,
    3. Siddiqui I,
    4. Soomro IN,
    5. Pervez S,
    6. Kayani N,
    7. Hasan SH
    : Central nervous system lymphomas: A histologic and immunophenotypic analysis. J Pak Med Assoc 50: 141-144, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Rubenstein J,
    2. Ferreri AJ,
    3. Pittaluga S
    : Primary lymphoma of the central nervous system: epidemiology, pathology and current approaches to diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Leuk Lymphoma 49(Suppl 1): 43-51, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sierra Del Rio M,
    2. Ricard D,
    3. Houillier C,
    4. Navarro S,
    5. Gonzalez-Aguilar A,
    6. Idbaih A,
    7. Kaloshi G,
    8. Elhallani S,
    9. Omuro A,
    10. Choquet S,
    11. Soussain C,
    12. Hoang-Xuan K
    : Prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy in primary CNS lymphoma. J Neurooncol, 2011.
  17. ↵
    1. Kiewe P,
    2. Fischer L,
    3. Martus P,
    4. Thiel E,
    5. Korfel A
    : Meningeal dissemination in primary CNS lymphoma: Diagnosis, treatment, and survival in a large monocenter cohort. Neuro Oncol 12: 409-417, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Ferreri AJ
    : How I treat primary CNS lymphoma. Blood 118: 510-522, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. O'Brien PC,
    2. Seymour JF
    : Progress in primary CNS lymphoma. Lancet 374: 1477-1478, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Joo KM,
    2. Park IH,
    3. Shin JY,
    4. Jin J,
    5. Kang BG,
    6. Kim MH,
    7. Lee SJ,
    8. Jo MY,
    9. Kim SU,
    10. Nam DH
    : Human neural stem cells can target and deliver therapeutic genes to breast cancer brain metastases. Mol Ther 17: 570-575, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Kim SK,
    2. Kim SU,
    3. Park IH,
    4. Bang JH,
    5. Aboody KS,
    6. Wang KC,
    7. Cho BK,
    8. Kim M,
    9. Menon LG,
    10. Black PM,
    11. Carroll RS
    : Human neural stem cells target experimental intracranial medullo-blastoma and deliver a therapeutic gene leading to tumor regression. Clin Cancer Res 12: 5550-5556, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Aboody KS,
    2. Najbauer J,
    3. Schmidt NO,
    4. Yang W,
    5. Wu JK,
    6. Zhuge Y,
    7. Przylecki W,
    8. Carroll R,
    9. Black PM,
    10. Perides G
    : Targeting of melanoma brain metastases using engineered neural stem/progenitor cells. Neuro Oncol 8: 119-126, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Danks MK,
    2. Yoon KJ,
    3. Bush RA,
    4. Remack JS,
    5. Wierdl M,
    6. Tsurkan L,
    7. Kim SU,
    8. Garcia E,
    9. Metz MZ,
    10. Najbauer J,
    11. Potter PM,
    12. Aboody KS
    : Tumor-targeted enzyme/prodrug therapy mediates long-term disease-free survival of mice bearing disseminated neuroblastoma. Cancer Res 67: 22-25, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. de Groot JF,
    2. Yung WK
    : Bevacizumab and irinotecan in the treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas. Cancer J 14: 279-285, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Poulsen HS,
    2. Grunnet K,
    3. Sorensen M,
    4. Olsen P,
    5. Hasselbalch B,
    6. Nelausen K,
    7. Kosteljanetz M,
    8. Lassen U
    : Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in the treatment patients with progressive recurrent malignant brain tumours. Acta Oncol 48: 52-58, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Quinn JA,
    2. Jiang SX,
    3. Reardon DA,
    4. Desjardins A,
    5. Vredenburgh JJ,
    6. Friedman AH,
    7. Sampson JH,
    8. McLendon RE,
    9. Herndon JE 2nd.,
    10. Friedman HS
    : Phase II trial of temozolomide (TMZ) plus irinotecan (CPT-11) in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme before radiotherapy. J Neurooncol 95: 393-400, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Wang W,
    2. Kardosh A,
    3. Su YS,
    4. Schonthal AH,
    5. Chen TC
    : Efficacy of celecoxib in the treatment of CNS lymphomas: An in vivo model. Neurosurg Focus 21: E14, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Bongso A,
    2. Fong CY,
    3. Gauthaman K
    : Taking stem cells to the clinic: Major challenges. J Cell Biochem 105: 1352-1360, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Sandu N,
    2. Schaller B
    : Stem cell transplantation in brain tumors: A new field for molecular imaging? Mol Med 16: 433-437, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Cho T,
    2. Bae JH,
    3. Choi HB,
    4. Kim SS,
    5. McLarnon JG,
    6. Suh-Kim H,
    7. Kim SU,
    8. Min CK
    : Human neural stem cells: Electrophysiological properties of voltage-gated ion channels. Neuroreport 13: 1447-1452, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Kim SU
    : Human neural stem cells genetically modified for brain repair in neurological disorders. Neuropathology 24: 159-171, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 12
December 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetically-engineered Human Neural Stem Cells with Rabbit Carboxyl Esterase Can Target CNS Lymphoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Genetically-engineered Human Neural Stem Cells with Rabbit Carboxyl Esterase Can Target CNS Lymphoma
WONYOUNG KANG, JUYOUN JIN, HEEKYOUNG YANG, HO JUN SEOL, KANG HO KIM, JUNG-II LEE, SEUNG U. KIM, KYEUNG MIN JOO, DO-HYUN NAM
Anticancer Research Dec 2013, 33 (12) 5335-5342;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Genetically-engineered Human Neural Stem Cells with Rabbit Carboxyl Esterase Can Target CNS Lymphoma
WONYOUNG KANG, JUYOUN JIN, HEEKYOUNG YANG, HO JUN SEOL, KANG HO KIM, JUNG-II LEE, SEUNG U. KIM, KYEUNG MIN JOO, DO-HYUN NAM
Anticancer Research Dec 2013, 33 (12) 5335-5342;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Delayed Vomiting Upon Irinotecan–Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Pancreatic/Colorectal Cancer
  • MMP-9 Genotypes Serve as Oral Cancer Predictive Marker for Smokers
  • A RANKL-derived Peptide Inhibits RSPO3-LGR4-Wnt Signaling and Lung Adenocarcinoma in Mice
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • irinotecan
  • carboxyl esterase (CE)
  • CNS lymphoma
  • neural stem cells
  • rabbit
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire