Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Silicate Fiber-based 3D Cell Culture System for Anticancer Drug Screening

YOSHIE YAMAGUCHI, DAWEI DENG, YOSHINORI SATO, YUNG-TE HOU, RIE WATANABE, KOHEI SASAKI, MASAAKI KAWABE, EIICHI HIRANO and TETSUO MORINAGA
Anticancer Research December 2013, 33 (12) 5301-5309;
YOSHIE YAMAGUCHI
1Japan Bio Products Co., Ltd., Aikawa, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAWEI DENG
1Japan Bio Products Co., Ltd., Aikawa, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHINORI SATO
1Japan Bio Products Co., Ltd., Aikawa, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUNG-TE HOU
1Japan Bio Products Co., Ltd., Aikawa, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RIE WATANABE
2Japan Vilene Company Ltd., Koga, Ibaraki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOHEI SASAKI
2Japan Vilene Company Ltd., Koga, Ibaraki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAAKI KAWABE
2Japan Vilene Company Ltd., Koga, Ibaraki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EIICHI HIRANO
1Japan Bio Products Co., Ltd., Aikawa, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TETSUO MORINAGA
1Japan Bio Products Co., Ltd., Aikawa, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: t_morinaga{at}placenta-jbp.co.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Errata - October 01, 2015

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) in vitro cultures can recapitulate the physiological in vivo microenvironment. 3D Modeling techniques have been investigated and applied in anticancer drug screening. Materials and Methods: A silicate fiber scaffold was used for 3D cell cultures, and used to model the efficacy of anticancer drugs, such as mytomicin C and doxorubicin. Results: A unique 3D structure was observed in 13 human tumor cell lines on scaffold, and these cells exhibited higher drug resistance than cells in two-dimensional (2D) cultures. Furthermore, the production of lactate and expression of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)-regulated genes B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were higher in 3D cultures than in 2D cultures. Conclusion: These findings suggest that a 3D model using a silicate fiber scaffold can mimic features of cancer, and is also a suitable model for the evaluation of anticancer drugs in vitro.

  • Three-dimensional (3D) culture
  • silicate fiber scaffold
  • drug resistance
  • anticancer drug screening

In anticancer drug discovery, dominantinly, screening and initial characterizations of potential anticancer drug candidates is performed using tumor cell monolayer cultures [two-dimensional (2D) cultures]. However, many therapeutics that demonstrate efficiency in vitro fail to present the same effect in vivo (1) because the 2D culture does not accurately reflect the physiological properties of tumors in vivo (2, 3). Most cancer researchers have to depend on 2D cultures at the initial step of drug discovery because they can provide various high-throughput applications (4, 5). However, it is necessary to develop a more biomimetic in vitro model of tumor tissue for prediction of drug efficiency.

Cell–cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions form a complex communication network of biochemical and mechanical signals that are crucial for in vivo tumor physiology. Three-dimensional (3D) cultures are known to closely mimic properties of tumor tissues (6), and many tools are now available to develop 3D cultures in vitro (7). One of the most critical factors in 3D cultures is the ‘scaffold’, which serves as an ECM substrate for cell growth and formation of 3D structures. Scaffolds for 3D culture heve been developed using natural scaffolds, such as collagen (8) and hyaluronic acid (9), synthetic polymers such as poly(lactide-coglycolide) (10), and polymer microparticles formed from poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic) acid and polylactide (11). These models are convenient; however, their applications are limited because they do not permit regulation of 3D structure or reproduction of 3D culture (12). The ECM has a predilection to adhere to hydrophobic surfaces; therefore, control of substrate hydrophobicity may be an effective approach for modulating cellular adhesion and proliferation.

Recently, silicate fibers (SNFs) prepared by electrospinning technology via a sol-gel process have been developed as a scaffold for tissue engineering (13-15). Electrospinning using the sol-gel method is useful for generating SNFs, as it enables the control of fiber diameter from several microns down to 100 nm. The resulting SNFs have a large surface area-to-volume ratio, high fraction of void space, and small pore sizes. In SNFs treated at 500°C, the hydroxyl group content decreases to 1% or less, and the surface of the SNFs becomes hydrophobic (15). Therefore, it is expected that SNFs treated in this manner may improve cell adhesion and cell proliferation while facilitating control and in vitro reproduction of the 3D structure. Our hypothesis is that the use of an SNF scaffold-based 3D tumor model may simulate in vivo conditions and thus be more effective than conventional 2D culture for determining the efficacy of anticancer drug candidates.

In the present study, we developed in vitro SNF-scaffold 3D cultures using various types of tumor cell lines. The anticancer effects of chemotherapeutic agents were studied, and their cytotoxicity was compared to that determined in conventional 2D cultures. Furthermore, we evaluated the uptake of anticancer drugs in 3D culture, and compared the effects of anticancer drugs on lactate production (tumor metabolic marker) and alternations of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)-regulated gene B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2; antiapoptosis), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2; cell growth), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; angiogenic factor) expression in 2D and 3D cultures.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals. Anticancer drugs were purchased as follows: mitomycin C from (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) and doxorubicin from (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). SNFs were supplied from Japan Vilene Company Ltd. (Ibaraki, Japan).

2D cell culture. The following human cancer cell lines were purchased from Health Science Research Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan) or RIKEN (Tsukuba, Japan) or the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA): A549 (lung adenocarcinoma), MCF-7 (breast cancer), MDA-MD-453 (breast cancer cell), HeLa (ovarian carcinoma), NIH:OVCAR-3 (ovarian carcinoma), HT-29 (colon adenocarcinoma), DLD-1 (colon carcinoma), DU145 (prostate cancer), HepG2 (hepatoma), Huh-7 (hepato cellular carcinoma), HLE (hepatoma), SUIT-2 (pancreatic cancer) and MIA PaCa-2 (pancreatic cancer). The cells were cultured in RPMI or Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

2D cell growth inhibition. Briefly, the cells were plated at an appropriate density in 96-well plates in medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and allowed to attach for 24 h. The inhibition of cell growth was assessed by measuring changes in total cellular protein in a culture of each cell line after 72 h of drug treatment by using of a sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay (16). Concentrations that inhibited cell growth by 50% (IC50) and 80% (IC80) after 72 h of treatment were calculated based on the survival rate compared against untreated cells.

3D culture. Three-dimensional culture using SNFs was described by Yamaguchi et al. (13). Briefly, SNFs were sterilized by autoclave, and transferred to 24-well plates. Culture media as same as 2D culture containing human cancer cells were poured into each well with SNFs of 24-well plates. Cells were cultured at 37°C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Forty-eight hours later, each SNF with cells was transferred to new 24-well plates, and fresh media were poured into each well. The media were exchanged every other day.

3D cell growth inhibition. The cells were plated at an appropriate density in 24-well plates in medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and allowed to attach for 24 h. Medium containing drugs was exchanged every 24 h for 96 h. Measurement of cell growth inhibition was calculated based on the amount of DNA, which was determined with a DNA Quantity kit (Primary Cell, Hokkaido, Japan) according to the manufacture's instructions.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM). Paraformaldehyde-fixed samples were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) thrice and then post-fixed with osmium tetroxide. Dehydration was accomplished using a graded series of ethanol (10, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100%), and then the samples were transferred to t-butyl alcohol. After the samples were frozen, dried samples without sputter coating were viewed in an ES-2030 Scanning electron microscope (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 15 kV.

Doxorubicin uptake. Seven days after growing, media were removed and 3D cells were incubated with fresh media containing 10 μM doxorubicin. The indicated incubation period (3, 6 and 24 hour), 3D cells were washed with PBS twice to remove unbound free doxorubicin, and were observed with a fluorescence microscope at excitation and emission wavelengths of 534 nm and 602 nm for doxorubicin.

To establish cellular drug uptake profiles, HT-29 cells were plated onto 24-well plates at densities of 5.0×105 cells/well at 37°C. Seven days later, doxorubicin (10 μM) was added to each well to initiate cellular drug accumulation. At different time intervals (3, 6 and 24 h), the supernatant was removed and cells were washed with ice-cold PBS (pH 7.6) and sonicated with PBS containing 2 mM EDTA. Doxorubicin in the cell lysates was measured with an FP-8300 Spectrofluorometer (JASCO, Easton, MD, USA) at an excitation wavelength of 480 nm and an emission wavelength of 560 nm. To adjust for background fluorescence from cellular components or non-specific binding to SNFs, doxorubicin standard curves were also prepared using cells or SNF lysates. Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay according to the manufacture's instructions (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).

Lactate production assay. To determine the glycolytic activity in 2D and 3D culture, the amount of produced lactate was measured. The cells were cultured until confluent or 3D form in regular medium. The medium was then changed, and the cells were incubated in Hank's balanced salt solution for 2 h at 37°C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The lactate in each sample was measured by EnzyChrom Lactate Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA).

Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription (RT). Isogen RNA extraction kit was purchased from Nippon Gene (Toyama, Japan). The quality of RNA was verified by the OD260:OD280 absorption ratio. Total RNA (0.5 μg) isolated from 2D or 3D cells was converted to single-strand cDNA using PrimeScript RTase (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) using 50 pM random hexamer primers (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

LightCycler real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For LightCycler reaction, a master mix of the following reaction components was prepared to the indicated end-concentration: 3 μl water (PCR grade), 1 μl forward primer (10 μM), 1 μl reverse primer (10 μM) and 10 μl LightCyler FastStart Essential DNA Green Master (Roche, Tokyo, Japan). cDNA (5 μl) was amplified by using a standardized RT-PCR protocol with FastStart Essential DNA Green Master kit (Roche) in a LightCycler instrument (Roche). The melting curve analysis program of the LightCycler was used to identify specific PCR products. The expression levels were normalized by that of 28S. The primers were as follows: BCL2: F, 5’-GGCTGGGATGCCTTTGTG-3’ and R, 5’-GCCAGGAGAAATCAA ACAGAGG-3’; COX-2: F, 5’-CTTCACGCATCAGTTTTTCAAG-3’ and R, 5’-TCACCGTAAATATGATTTAAGTCCAC-3’; VEGF: F, 5’-CCGCAGACGTGTAAATGTTCCT-3’ and R, 5’-CGGCTTGTCA CATCTGCAAGTA-3’; 28S: F, 5’-CCGCTGCGGTGAGCCTTGAA-3’ and R, 5’-TCTCCGGGATCGGTCGCGTT-3’. The presence of the expected PCR products after quantitative real-time RT-PCR reactions (64 bp for BCL2, 96 bp for COX2, 95 bp for VEGF and 312 bp for 28S) was confirmed by an agarose gel electrophoresis (data not shown).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

3D structure formation of HT-29 cells on silicate fibers (SNFs). A: Generation of 3D structure of HT-29 cells on SNFs. Time-lapse scanning electron micrograph of HT-29 cells growing on SNFs. B: Cross section of 3D structure of HT-29 cells on SNFs at day 7. C: Amount of DNA in growing cultures (reflective of cell number).

Statistical analysis. All data are presented as the mean±SD for at least three replicate experiments and were analyzed with Student's t-test.

Results

Generation of unique 3D structures by tumor cell lines on SNFs. To determine whether tumor cells form 3D structures on SNF scaffolds, HT-29 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells were used. SEM showed that HT-29 cells grew gradually and had tight cell-cell adhesions where individual cell margins were hardly detectable at day 10 (Figure 1A). The SEM cross-section showed that HT-29 cells on SNFs formed tight aggregates (Figure 1B). As shown in Figure 1C, the amount of DNA (used as a proxy for cell number) in HT-29 cells on SNFs increased commensurately with the formation of the 3D structure, reaching a plateau at day 8. Twelve other tumor cell lines were also found to form unique 3D structures on SNFs (Table I), and these 3D cultures were grouped into four categories: tight aggregate, loose aggregate, small spheroidal aggregate, and loose small spheroidal aggregate. As shown in Figure 2, HT-29, DLD-1, and MCF-7 cells on SNFs were tightly aggregated without cell margins, whereas cell margins were observed in A549 cells and ovarian, prostate, and liver cancer cells. The aggregates appeared to be undistinguished rod aggregates (SUIT-2 and MIA PaCa-2) with loose small spheroidal aggregates (MDA-MB-453 and HeLa). Cross-sections showed that in rod aggregates, small spheroidal units were linearly-arrayed in a vertical direction whereas these units were completely randomly distributed in the loose small spheroidal aggregates (Figure 2G and H).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Morphology of 3D cancer cell lines on silicate fibers (SNFs).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Representative unique 3D cell morphology of four types of tumor cell lines. Unique 3D structures were generated from 5.0×105 cells (HT-29, HepG2 and MDA-MB-453) and 2.5×105 cells (Suit-2) on silicate fibers (SNFs) and cultured for seven days. 3D cell morphology: HT-29 (A), HepG2 (B), SUIT-2 (C), MDA-MB-453 (D), cross section shows 3D cell morphology: HT-29 (E), HepG2 (F), SUIT-2 (G), and MDA-MB-453 (H) cells.

Antiproliferative activity of anticancer drugs in 2D culture vs. 3D culture. The response to mitomycin C was evaluated in 2D and 3D cultures of HT-29, HepG2, SUIT-2, and MDA-MB-453 cells. The IC50 determined in initial 2D experiments was then applied to 3D culture; however, cytotoxicity was not observed in 3D culture with SNFs (data not shown). Similar effects were also observed for other anticancer drugs (camptothecin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and etoposide; data not shown). We therefore determined the IC80 in 2D cultures exposed to pulses every 24 h (Figure 3A). Cell viability was similar in 2D and 3D cultures at the time of treatment, relative to the untreated control. Treatment of 3D-cultured cells with mitomycin C resulted in some disruption of 3D structure relative to the untreated control by SEM (Figure 3B), particularly in MDA-MD-453 cells on SNFs. A cell viability assay showed a significant difference between 2D and 3D cultures with regard to anticancer drug sensitivitiy: resistance to mitomycin C in 3D cultures was increased by 4.1-, 2.2-, 4.5-, and 1.8-fold for HT-29, HepG2, SUIT-2, and MDA-MB-453 cells, respectively (Figure 3C). Increased drug resistance to camptothecin was also observed for HT-29, HepG2, and MDA-MB-453 cells, and to sorafenib for Huh-7 cells (data not shown).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Anti-proliferative activity of anticancer drugs in 3D model of HT-29, HepG2, SUIT-2 and MDA-MB-453 cells. A: Anticancer drug administration protocol for 3D culture. Arrowhead shows time of anticancer drug administration. B: Images by scanning electron microscopy of HepG2, Suit-2, MDA-MB-453, and HT-29 cells growing on SNF cultures and the effect of mitomycin C (MMC). C: Comparative cytotoxicity of MMC in 2D and 3D cultures. **p<0.001.

Doxorubicin uptake by HT-29 cells on SNFs. It is possible that the aggregated morphology may have restricted drug penetration and reduced drug exposure in cells in the interior of the 3D structure; therefore, the penetration of doxorubicin into 3D cultures was evaluated. The fluorescence intensity of the cultures was measured at 3, 6, and 24 h after drug exposure. Over time, the fluorescence intensity of doxorubicin increased, with maximum fluorescence being observed at 24 h (Figure 4A). The cells were still alive after 24 h of incubation with doxorubicin (data not shown). Only 7.5% of the total doxorubicin added (10 μM) penetrated into HT-29 cells on SNFs (Figure 4B).

Glycolysis in 2D culture vs. 3D culture. Cancer cells generally exhibit increased glycolysis for ATP generation, which is known as the Warburg effect (17). This increased glycolysis is achieved in part by mitochondrial respiration injury and hypoxia, which are frequently associated with resistance to anticancer drugs. It has been shown that inhibition of glycolysis in tumor cells leads to increased drug sensitivity (18, 19). Lactate production was evaluated to determine the glycolytic activity in 2D and 3D cultures. As anticipated, lactate levels were significantly higher in 3D cultures relative to 2D cultures (Figure 5). Moreover, a similar increase in lactate production was observed in HepG2, SUIT-2, and MDA-MB-453 cells on SNFs (data not shown).

Genes regulated by the transcriptional factor NF-κB in 2D culture vs. 3D culture. NF-κB is a central transcriptional factor that influences oncogenesis, apoptosis, and anticancer drug sensitivity in colorectal cancer. NF-κB is involved in cell survival, proliferation, and angiogenesis in multiple tumor types (20, 21). To evaluate the molecular mechanism underlying anticancer drug resistance in 3D culture, the expression of NF-κB-regulated genes was studied. Expression of BCL2 (survival), COX2 (proliferation), and VEGF (angiogenesis) was significantly higher in 3D than in 2D cultures (Figure 6).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Doxorubicin uptake in a 3D model (HT-29 cells) on silicate fibers (SNFs). A: Representative images of doxorubicin uptake in HT-29 cells growing on SNFs. Images were taken at 3-, 6-, and 24-h time points. B: Relative fluorescence intensitiy of doxorubicin uptake.

Discussion

Three-dimensional culture platforms present different cell differentiation and behavior relative to conventional 2D culture (1, 3, 22-23). Given the benefit of 3D culture models, particularly with regard to anticancer drug discovery, we have developed an in vitro model using various types of tumor cells with SNFs prepared by electrospinning via a sol-gel process. 3D Culture systems facilitate the expression of hallmark features of cancer cells, such as unlimited proliferation, self-sufficiency in growth signals, resistance to anti-growth signals, anti-apoptosis, invasion, and angiogenesis (12, 24). Conventionally, naturally-occurring or organic synthetic scaffolds formed from collagen, hyaluronic acid poly(lactide-coglycolide), and poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic), or polylactide polymer microparticles have been used in 3D culture systems (8-11).

In the present study, we found that an inorganic scaffold generated using SNFs could be adapted to 3D culture. Although SNF scaffolds have been used for the 3D culture of several cell lines, such as MG63, CHO-K1, and HepG2 (13-15), they have not yet been used for other human tumor cell lines. In the present study, we found that at least 13 tumor cell lines can be cultured in 3D culture using SNF scaffolds. The effective formation of 3D structures and subsequent culture of these cancer cells depend to a large extent on the features of the SNFs, including hydrophobicity. Previous studies have shown that various factors, including the affinity of the cell to the scaffold surface, contribute to the formation of 3D structures, and that scaffold hydrophobicity is a particularly important factor in this process, likely because the ECM facilitates adhesion to scaffold surfaces with hydrophobic composition (25, 26). In the present study, the cultured cells formed four classes of unique 3D structures, partly according to their original tissues. The reason for such different 3D structures in culture of cancer cell lines remains unclear. Among the cell lines, 3D structural differences were not observed in colon, liver, and pancreas cancer cells. In contrast, breast cancer cell lines had a completely different 3D structure. However, other cell lines must be evaluated to exclude the possibility that these differences may reflect the individual characteristics of each cancer cell line.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Glycolysis in 2D and 3D culture on silicate fibers (SNFs). The amount of lactate produced by 2D and 3D tumor models was measured by lactate assay. Representative data (mean±SD, n=3) were normalised to their DNA content. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Analysis of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)-regulated genes in 2D and 3D culture on silicate fibers (SNFs). Relative expression of NF-κB-regulated genes, B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in 2D and 3D culture. All data (mean±SD, n=4-6) were normalized by 28S RNA. *p<0.005, **p<0.001.

It has been reported that MCF-7 cells form spheroids in Matrigel (27), whereas they induce the formation of tight aggregates on SNFs. Spheroid cultures have been predominantly used in in vitro 3D culture systems but are associated with limitations, such as those related to culture handling, control of spheroid size, and adaptation of the re-circulation experiment, for example, with respect to the bioreactor system which is for assessment of the penetration of anticancer drugs through a solid tissue environment. The use of SNFs can overcome these drawbacks and may thus enable the development of a novel bioreactor system. In addition, regarding the four different unique 3D conformations, human colon adenocarcinoma HT-29 and DLD-1 cells formed the same type of 3D structure, that is, a tight aggregate, not demonstrated by other cell lines.

Many solid tumors are poorly-vascularized, with variable rates of blood flow and larger intercapillary distances than in normal tissues. The requirement for anticancer drugs to penetrate multiple layers of tissue may pose a barrier to the effective therapy of solid tumors, and penetration of anticancer drugs into tumor cells distant from the vascular system is necessary for efficacy of cancer chemotherapy against solid tumors. Recently, an in vitro model was developed for direct quantitative assessment of the penetration of anticancer drugs into solid tumors (28, 29). The structural features of HT-29 and DLD-1 cells on SNFs should allow their adaptation to such an assay system, thereby resulting in a novel model for assessment of anticancer drug penetration. Moreover, although the 3D structure of HT-29 and DLD-1 cells on SNFs is similar to that of multicellular spheroids (30), their planar structure allows flux through the cultures to be more easily measured (31-32). Consequently, the 3D SNF system will likely provide more predictive data, allow for reduced animal testing, and reduce the costs and time for required drug discovery, in addition to enabling a faster time to the markets.

In this study, we observed a critical difference in the response to anticancer drugs in 2D and 3D culture systems. To investigate the disparity in the effective drug dose in our tumor model, we compared drug uptake and gene expression in conventional 2D and 3D culture systems. Firstly, we studied the penetration efficiency of doxorubicin into 3D-cultured cells on SNFs. Only 7.5% of the doxorubicin penetrated inside the 3D cells, which is consistent with the well-known feature of insufficient penetration of drugs in 3D tumor models (12, 28, 33). Moreover, the poor penetration of anticancer drugs into an in vitro tumor may explain clinically-observed anticancer drug resistance, as a similar environment is present in vivo (34). Poor drug penetration results in a requirement for high doses of anticancer drugs during therapy. We speculate that the poor drug penetration observed in a 3D culture may be why many anticancer drug candidates screened in 2D tumor models fail in in vivo tests or clinical trials.

Another possible factor underlying anticancer drug resistance in 3D culture is increased glycolytic activity. Persistent glycolysis is a characteristic of cancer cells and a hallmark of advanced cancer. Lactate is associated with tumor progression (35), and lactate accumulation in tumors is associated with metastasis and poor survival (36, 37). We observed that lactate accumulation was higher in 3D cultures than in 2D cultures. In addition, in the media of the 3D cultures, the color of the phenol red dye changed from red to yellow within only 24 h, i.e. between pre-confluency and post-confluency, whereas this change was not observed in the media of 2D cultures, even after confluency (data not shown). The rapid acidification of the 3D culture likely resulted from the secretion of lactate by the cells, as supported by the higher lactate production in 3D cultures relative to that in 2D cultures. These findings further suggest that 3D culture on SNFs may be better representative of the in vivo tumor environment.

Furthermore, the disparity of anticancer drug sensitivity in 2D and 3D cultures may be associated with altered gene expression. We found that gene expression of BCL2, COX2, and VEGF was higher in 3D cultures than in 2D cultures. All these genes are known to be regulated by NF-κB (20, 21). The up-regulation of the anti-apoptic marker BCL2 in 3D cultures is consistent with findings from other 3D culture systems showing that a decrease in apoptosis alters gene expression (38, 39). It was previously found that COX2 is up-regulated in colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer (40, 41). Considering that COX2 inhibitors can induce apoptosis and enhance the cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs (42), COX2 may play a role in colorectal cancer. COX2 overexpression has been reported to confer resistance to apoptosis by up-regulation of BCL2 (43, 44). VEGF as a survival factor for tumor cells is also regulated by NF-κB, and it has been reported that COX2 expression in cancer cells stimulates the production of VEGF (45). In addition, VEGF up-regulates BCL2 and inhibits apoptosis of human cancer cells (46). Up-regulation of BCL2 may be mediated by COX2 and VEGF, thereby inducing anticancer drug resistance.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that an in vitro 3D tumor model using SNF scaffolds prepared by electrospinning technology via a sol-gel process can be used as a novel system for assessment of the efficacy of potential anticancer drugs. This method allows for direct quantitative assessment of the penetration of anticancer drugs through a solid-tissue environment. Furthermore, this 3D tumor model can be used in screening angiogenic factor-targeted therapies. In addition, the fact that SNF scaffolds can create different unique 3D structures, with each type being tumor-dependent, can help to understand tumor cellular morphological evolution more precisely.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Received October 22, 2013.
  • Revision received November 7, 2013.
  • Accepted November 8, 2013.
  • Copyright© 2013 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Griffith LG,
    2. Swartz MA
    : Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 211-224, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Cukierman E,
    2. Pankov R,
    3. Stevens DR,
    4. Yamada KM
    : Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294: 1708-1712, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Labarbera DV,
    2. Reid BG,
    3. Yoo BH
    : The multicellular tumor spheroid model for high-throughput cancer drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 9: 819-830, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Newman MJ,
    2. Rodarte JC,
    3. Benbatoul KD,
    4. Romano SJ,
    5. Zhang C,
    6. Krane S,
    7. Moran EJ,
    8. Uyeda RT,
    9. Dixon R,
    10. Guns ES,
    11. Mayer LD
    : Discovery and characterization of OC144-093, a novel inhibitor of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance. Cancer Res 60: 2964-2972, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Torrance CJ,
    2. Agrawal V,
    3. Vogelstein B,
    4. Kinzler KW
    : Use of isogenic human cancer cells for high-throughput screening and drug discovery. Nat Biotechnol 19: 940-945, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Sutherland RM
    : Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: the multicell spheroid model. Science 240: 177-184, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Lin RZ,
    2. Chang HY
    : Recent advances in three-dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research. Biotechnol J 3: 1172-1184, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Holliday DL,
    2. Brouilette KT,
    3. Markert A,
    4. Gordon LA,
    5. Jones JL
    : Novel multicellular organotypic models of normal and malignant breast: Tools for dissecting the role of the microenvironment in breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res 11: R3, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Gurski LA,
    2. Jha AK,
    3. Zhang C,
    4. Jia X,
    5. Farach-Carson MC
    : Hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels as 3D matrices for in vitro evaluation of chemotherapeutic drugs using poorly adherent prostate cancer cells. Biomaterials 30: 6076-6085, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Fischbach C,
    2. Chen R,
    3. Matsumoto T,
    4. Schmelzle T,
    5. Brugge JS,
    6. Polverini PJ,
    7. Mooney DJ
    : Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds. Nat Methods 4: 855-860, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Sahoo SK,
    2. Panda AK,
    3. Labhasetwar V
    : Characterization of porous PLGA/PLA microparticles as a scaffold for three dimensional growth of breast cancer cells. Biomacromolecules 6: 1132-1139, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Horning JL,
    2. Sahoo SK,
    3. Vijayaraghavalu S,
    4. Dimitrijevic S,
    5. Vasir JK,
    6. Jain TK,
    7. Panda AK,
    8. Labhasetwar V
    : 3-D tumor model for in vitro evaluation of anticancer drugs. Mol Pharm 5: 849-862, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Yamaguchi T,
    2. Sakai S,
    3. Kawakami K
    : Application of silicate electrospun nanofibers for cell culture. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 48: 350-355, 2008.
    OpenUrl
    1. Sakai S,
    2. Yamaguchi T,
    3. Putra RA,
    4. Watanabe R,
    5. Kawabe M,
    6. Taya M,
    7. Kawakami K
    : Controlling apatite microparticles formation by calcining electrospun sol-gel derived ultrafine silica fibers. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 61: 374-380, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Yamaguchi T,
    2. Sakai S,
    3. Watanabe R,
    4. Tarao T,
    5. Kawakami K
    : Heat treatment of electrospun silicate fiber substrates enhances cellular adhesion and proliferation. J Biosci Bioengin 109: 304-306, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Skehan P,
    2. Storeng R,
    3. Scudiero D,
    4. Monks A,
    5. McMahon J,
    6. Vistica D,
    7. Warren JT,
    8. Bokesch H,
    9. Kenney S,
    10. Boyd MR
    : New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 82: 1107-1112, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Warburg O
    : On the original of cancer cells. Science 123: 309-314, 1956.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Zhou M,
    2. Zhao Y,
    3. Ding Y,
    4. Liu H,
    5. Liu Z,
    6. Fodstad O,
    7. Riker AI,
    8. Kamarajugadda S,
    9. Lu J,
    10. Owen LB,
    11. Ledoux SP,
    12. Tan M
    : Warburg effect in chemosensitivity: targeting lactate dehydrogenase-A re-sensitizes taxol-resistant cancer cells to taxol. Mol Cancer 9: 33, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Le A,
    2. Cooper CR,
    3. Gouw AM,
    4. Dinavahi R,
    5. Maitra A,
    6. Deck LM,
    7. Royer RE,
    8. Vander Jagt DL,
    9. Semenza GL,
    10. Dang CV
    : Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A induces oxidative stress and inhibits tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 2037-2042, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Aggarwal BB
    : Nuclear factor-κB: The enemy within. Cancer Cell 6: 203-208, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kunnumakkara AB,
    2. Diagaradjane P,
    3. Anand P,
    4. Harikumar KB,
    5. Deorukhkar A,
    6. Gelovani J,
    7. Guha S,
    8. Krishnan S,
    9. Aggarwal BB
    : Curcumin sensitizes human colorectal cancer to capecitabine by modulation of cyclin D1, COX2, MMP9, VEGF and CXCR4 expression in an orthotopic mouse model. Int J Cancer 125: 2187-2197, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Kim JB
    : Three-dimensional tissue culture models in cancer biology. Semin Cancer Biol 15: 365-377, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Pampaloni F,
    2. Reynaud EG,
    3. Stelzer EH
    : The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 839-845, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Hanahan D,
    2. Weinberg RA
    : The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100: 57-70, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Karikusa F,
    2. Sawasaki Y
    : The restoration of the functions of serially passaged calf hepatocytes by spheroid formation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 32: 30-37, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Curran JA,
    2. Chen R,
    3. Hun JA
    : The guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in vitro by controlled modifications to the cell substrate. Biomaterials 27: 4783-4793, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Ivascu A,
    2. Kubbies M
    : Diversity of cell-mediated adhesions in breast cancer spheroids. Int J Oncol 31: 1403-13, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Kyle AH,
    2. Huxham LA,
    3. Chiam AS,
    4. Sim DH,
    5. Minchinton AI
    : Direct assessment of drug penetration into tissue using a novel application of three-dimensional cell culture. Cancer Res 64: 6304-6309, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Grantab R,
    2. Sivananthan S,
    3. Tannock IF
    : The penetration of anticancer drugs through tumor tissue as a function of cellular adhesion and packing density of tumor cells. Cancer Res 66: 1033-1039, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Suntherland RM
    : Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: The multicell spheroid model. Science 240: 177-184, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Kyle AH,
    2. Minchinton AI
    : Measurement of delivery and metabolism of tirapazamine to tumour tissue using the multilayered cell culture model. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 43: 213-220, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hicks KO,
    2. Ohms SJ,
    3. van Zijl PL,
    4. Denny WA,
    5. Hunter PJ,
    6. Wilson WR
    : An experimental and mathematical model for the extravascular transport of a DNA intercalator in tumours. Br J Cancer 76: 894-903, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Mitra M,
    2. Mohanty C,
    3. Harilal A,
    4. Maheswari UK,
    5. Sahoo SK,
    6. Krishnakumar S
    : A novel in vitro three-dimensional retinoblastoma model for evaluating chemotherapeutic drugs. Mol Vis 18: 1361-1378, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Kyle AH,
    2. Huxham LA,
    3. Yeoman DM,
    4. Minchinton AI
    : Limited tissue penetration of taxanes: A mechanism for resistance in solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 13: 2804-2810, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Stubbs M,
    2. McSheehy PM,
    3. Griffiths JR,
    4. Bashford CL
    : Causes and consequences of tumour acidity and implications for treatment. Mol Med Today 6: 15-19, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Brizel DM,
    2. Schroeder T,
    3. Scher RL,
    4. Walenta S,
    5. Clough RW,
    6. Dewhirst MW,
    7. Mueller-Klieser W
    : Elevated tumor lactate concentrations predict for an increased risk of metastases in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51: 349-353, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Walenta S,
    2. Salameh A,
    3. Lyng H,
    4. Evensen JF,
    5. Mitze M,
    6. Rofstad EK,
    7. Mueller-Klieser W
    : Correlation of high lactate levels in head and neck tumors with incidence of metastasis. Am. J. Pathol 150: 409-415, 1997.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Godugu C,
    2. Patel AR,
    3. Desai U,
    4. Andey T,
    5. Sams A,
    6. Singh M
    : AlgiMatrix™ based 3D cell culture system as an in-vitro tumor model for anticancer studies. PLoS One 8: e53708, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Yang TM,
    2. Barbone D,
    3. Fennell DA,
    4. Broaddus VC
    : BCL2 family proteins contribute to apoptotic resistance in lung cancer multicellular spheroids. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 41: 14-23, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Eberhart CE,
    2. Coffey RJ,
    3. Radhika A,
    4. Giardiello FM,
    5. Ferrenbach S,
    6. DuBois RN
    : Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology 107: 1183-1188, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Koki AT,
    2. Leahy KM,
    3. Masferrer JL
    : Potential utility of COX2 inhibitors in chemoprevention and chemotherapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 8: 1623-1638, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Hida T,
    2. Kozaki K,
    3. Muramatsu H,
    4. Masuda A,
    5. Shimizu S,
    6. Mitsudomi T,
    7. Sugiura T,
    8. Ogawa M,
    9. Takahashi T
    : Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor induces apoptosis and enhances cytotoxicity of various anticancer agents in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 6: 2006-2011, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Tsujii M,
    2. DuBois RN
    : Alterations in cellular adhesion and apoptosis in epithelial cells overexpressing prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell 83: 493-501, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Tang XM,
    3. Half E,
    4. Kuo MT,
    5. Sinicrope FA
    : Cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression reduces apoptotic susceptibility by inhibiting the cytochrome c-dependent apoptotic pathway in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res 62: 6323-6328, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Tsujii M,
    2. Kawano S,
    3. Tsuji S,
    4. Sawaoka H,
    5. Hori M,
    6. DuBois RN
    : Cyclooxygenase regulates angiogenesis induced by colon cancer cells. Cell 93: 705-716, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Pidgeon GP,
    2. Barr MP,
    3. Harmey JH,
    4. Foley DA,
    5. Bouchier-Hayes DJ
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) up-regulates BCL2 and inhibits apoptosis in human and murine mammary adenocarcinoma cells. Br J Cancer 85: 273-278, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 12
December 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Silicate Fiber-based 3D Cell Culture System for Anticancer Drug Screening
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Silicate Fiber-based 3D Cell Culture System for Anticancer Drug Screening
YOSHIE YAMAGUCHI, DAWEI DENG, YOSHINORI SATO, YUNG-TE HOU, RIE WATANABE, KOHEI SASAKI, MASAAKI KAWABE, EIICHI HIRANO, TETSUO MORINAGA
Anticancer Research Dec 2013, 33 (12) 5301-5309;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Silicate Fiber-based 3D Cell Culture System for Anticancer Drug Screening
YOSHIE YAMAGUCHI, DAWEI DENG, YOSHINORI SATO, YUNG-TE HOU, RIE WATANABE, KOHEI SASAKI, MASAAKI KAWABE, EIICHI HIRANO, TETSUO MORINAGA
Anticancer Research Dec 2013, 33 (12) 5301-5309;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • POM121 Drives Gastric Cancer Progression via the mTOR/p70S6K Signaling Axis
  • Glutamine Dependence Is Not a Cancer-specific Vulnerability in Contrast to Methionine Dependence
  • mTOR Modulation Affects Galectin-1 Expression in KMT2A-rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Three-dimensional (3D) culture
  • silicate fiber scaffold
  • drug resistance
  • anticancer drug screening
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire