Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Comprehensive Survey of HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS Mutations in Proliferative Thyroid Lesions from An Ethnically Diverse Population

HANS-JUERGEN SCHULTEN, SHERINE SALAMA, ALAA AL-AHMADI, ZUHOOR AL-MANSOURI, ZEENAT MIRZA, KHALID AL-GHAMDI, OSMAN ABDEL AL-HAMOUR, ETIMAD HUWAIT, MAMDOOH GARI, MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN AL-QAHTANI and JAUDAH AL-MAGHRABI
Anticancer Research November 2013, 33 (11) 4779-4784;
HANS-JUERGEN SCHULTEN
1Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hschulten@kau.edu.sa
SHERINE SALAMA
2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALAA AL-AHMADI
1Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3Department of Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ZUHOOR AL-MANSOURI
4Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ZEENAT MIRZA
5King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KHALID AL-GHAMDI
6Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
OSMAN ABDEL AL-HAMOUR
7Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ETIMAD HUWAIT
3Department of Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAMDOOH GARI
1Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN AL-QAHTANI
1Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JAUDAH AL-MAGHRABI
2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The distribution and kind of rat sarcoma viral oncogenes homolog (RAS) mutations, as well as their clinical impact on different types of thyroid lesions, vary widely among the different populations studied. We performed a comprehensive mutational survey in the highly related RAS genes HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS in a case series of proliferative thyroid lesions with known BRAF mutational status, originating from an ethnically diverse group. Materials and Methods: Mutational hotspot regions encompassing codons 12, 13, and 61 of the RAS genes were directly sequenced in 381 cases of thyroid lesions. In addition, the putative NRAS hotspot region encompassing codon 97 was sequenced in 36 thyroid lesions. The case series included lesions of Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), nodular goiters, hyperplastic nodules, follicular adenomas (FAs), Hurthle cell variants of FA, papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs), follicular variants of PTC (FVPTCs), microcarcinomas of PTC (micro PTCs; tumor size ≤1 cm), follicular TCs (FTCs), Hurthle cell variants of FTC, and non-well-differentiated TCs (NWDTCs). Results: We identified RAS mutations in 16 out of 57 (28.1%) FAs, 2 out of 8 (25%) NWDTCs, 8 out of 42 (19.0%) FVPTCs, 2 out of 10 (20.0%) FTCs, 1 out of 12 (8.3%) Hurthle cell variants of FA, 3 out of 46 (6.5%) goiters, 1 out of 18 (5.6%) hyperplastic nodules, 3 out of 56 (5.4%) micro PTCs, 2 out of 115 (1.7%) PTCs, 0 out of 7 (0%) Hurthle cell variants of FTC, and 0 out of 10 (0%) HT lesions. NRAS codon 61 mutation was the predominant form, followed by HRAS codon 61 mutation. Only three mutations affected RAS codons 12 and 13, two of which were identified in goiters. No codon 97 mutation was detected in the examined FVPTCs. An as yet undescribed deletion of KRAS codon 59 was identified in one FA. Discussion: RAS mutations in our case series were commonly associated with follicular-patterned thyroid lesions. Our data suggest that FAs with a RAS mutation may constitute precursor lesions for TC with follicular histology. The newly-discovered KRAS codon 59 deletion is one of the first reported codon deletions in a RAS hotspot region.

  • HRAS, KRAS and NRAS mutations
  • KRAS codon 59 deletion
  • BRAF mutations
  • follicular-patterned thyroid lesions

The rat sarcoma viral oncogenes homolog (RAS) genes HRAS, KRAS and NRAS, are crucial effector molecules in a number of signalling cascades including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), the phophatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RalGEF) pathways (1). The RAS molecules transmit mitogen signals from tyrosine kinase membrane receptors via downstream effectors to transcription factors that ultimately regulate gene expression (2, 3). The RAS genes encode small GTPases that are bound in the inactive stage to GDP and in the active stage to GTP. GEFs and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) promote stage switching: GEFs support the release of GDP that enables GTP to bind, leading to conformational change of the two switch regions from the inactive to the active stage. Mutations in RAS codons 12, 13, and 61 affect the GTPase activity resulting in a constitutively activated state (4). Of all RAS mutations, 99% target either codons 12, 13 or 61 with variable preference, for instance 66% of all KRAS mutations affect codon 12, whereas 95% of all NRAS mutations affect codon 61 (5).

KRAS is one of the most commonly mutated molecules in cancer, reflecting its critical key regulatory functions, not only for neoplastic but also for normal development, as findings in mice indicate that KRAS, in its splice variant encoding K-RAS4B, is indispensable for normal development (6, 7). Yet in some tumor types, including follicular TC (FTC) and anaplastic TC, NRAS is preferentially mutated whereas in Hurthle cell variant of FTC, and medullary TC (MTC), HRAS is the predominately mutated variant (8, 9). A variety of factors, including embryological origin of tissue, differential interactions with regulators/effectors, mode of intracellular processing and subcellular location, may contribute to tumour type specificity of the different RAS isoform mutations (4). Mutations outside the hotspot regions of codons 12, 13 and 61 are far less frequent and preferentially target the C-terminal, membrane-oriented domain; however, NRAS point-mutations at the arginine of codon 97 (R97) affecting the allosteric site of lobe 2 have been reported (5, 10). The aim of the current study was to delineate the frequency, distribution, and clinicopathological impact of RAS mutations in proliferative thyroid lesions originating in an ethnically diverse population. The cases were previously characterized by their v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogenes homolog B (BRAF) mutational status, revealing the highest prevalence for BRAF mutations in papillary TC (PTC) (~63%) (11). BRAF is the major downstream effector of the RAS molecules within the MAPK signalling pathway.

Materials and Methods

Proliferative thyroid lesions. We examined 381 cases of proliferative thyroid lesions from 376 patients which were treated surgically in the period between January 1995 to June 2011 at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, and the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, or were referral/consultant cases from other regional hospitals (11). For five patients, non-cancerous as well as cancerous thyroid lesions were evaluated in this study. Sixty one percent were Saudi Arabian patients, 27% originated from other Middle East and North African countries, 8% originated from other world regions, and nationality was not reported for 4%. Histopathological diagnosis and staging of thyroid lesions was performed by an oncologic pathologist (JM) according to established criteria (12, 13). A detailed overview of demographic and clinicopathological data is provided elsewhere (11). The young mean age of the patients in our case series can be attributed to the young population structure of the region. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Medicine (#358-10), and the Institutional Review Board of the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (#IRB2010-07). Written informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from prospective study participants.

Mutational screening. Only specimens with no-less than 70% of proliferative thyroid cells were included in the mutational screening. Genomic DNA was extracted in the majority of cases from 10-μm sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material and in a minority of cases (n=116) from freshly-preserved specimens according to established protocols. The standard PCR protocol including primer sequences for HRAS, KRAS and NRAS codons 12, 13 and 61 was described earlier (14). For mutational screening of the putative hotspot region of codon 97, primers were used to amplify the 3’ region of NRAS coding exon 2 and the 5’ region of NRAS coding exon 3. The primer sequences were as follows: NRAS-ex2-97-F: GGTGAAACCTGTTTGTTGG, NRAS-ex2-97-R: TTCCCTAGTGTGGTAACC, NRAS-ex3-97-F: AAACTCCTGGGTTCAAGC, NRAS-ex3-97-R: TAACTCTTGGCCAGTTCG. For this mutational screening, 36 follicular variants of PTC (FVPTCs) were selected based on sufficient DNA availability. PCR products were confirmed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. Purified PCR products were subjected to cycle sequence reactions using nested primers overlapping with the PCR primers and BigDye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Purified sequencing products were finally resolved by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI PRISM 3130 Sequencer. Sequences were screened for mutations using a combination of manual readout of electropherograms and the NCBI's online BLAST database (15). Sequence results for NRAS codon 61 were of insufficient quality in one NWDTC and were excluded from analysis.

Protein structure prediction. The iterative threading assembly refinement (I-TASSER) server for automated protein structure and function prediction was used to model for entire protein structures of wild-type and mutant KRAS (16). I-TASSER employs state-of-the-art algorithms and displays three dimensional structures in pdb format. Figures of aligned protein structures were made by using PyMOL (17), which performs sequence alignment followed by structural alignment and refinement.

Results

Hotspot regions in coding exons 1 and 2 of HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS were screened for mutations in 381 cases of proliferative thyroid lesions. In addition, the putative NRAS hotspot region encompassing codon 97 that is split between its second and third base into coding exons 2 and 3 was sequenced in 36 FVPTCs. The entire case series comprised of 10 Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) lesions, 46 nodular goiters, 18 hyperplastic nodules, 57 follicular adenomas (FAs), 12 Hurthle cell variants of FA, 115 PTCs, 42 FVPTCs, 56 microcarcinomas of PTC (micro PTCs; tumor size ≤1 cm), 10 FTCs, seven Hurthle cell variants of FTC, and eight NWDTCs (Table I).

RAS mutations were most commonly identified in tumors with follicular-patterned histology including FAs (16 mutations out of 57 cases) and FVPTCs (8 mutations out of 42 cases) (Table I). Fifty-three percent (20 out of 38 mutations) of all detected RAS mutations affected NRAS codon 61 and 32% (12 out of 38 mutations) affected KRAS codon 61 (Table I). We identified only three mutations RAS codons 12 and 13 in our study, affecting HRAS codon 13 and KRAS codon 12 in two goiters and KRAS codon 13 in an FVPTC. The most common type of mutation was a glutamine-to-arginine substitution at NRAS codon 61 (15 CAA→CGA; Q61R) followed by a glutamine-to-arginine substitution at HRAS codon 61 (10 CAG→CGG; Q61R). One FA exhibited an almost hemi/homozygous NRAS codon 61 mutation. An as yet undescribed KRAS mutation resulting in deletion of codon 59 (A59del) was identified in an FA (Figure 1). This mutation was confined to the tumour. Sequence analysis of NRAS codon 97 disclosed no mutation in the analysed FVPTCs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

HRAS, KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutational status in 381 cases of proliferative thyroid lesions.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A new 3-base-pair deletion at KRAS codon 59 identified in a follicular adenoma results in deletion of alanine 59 (p.A59del). Nucleotides and codon affected by the deletion are underlined.

Patients with a RAS mutation in an FA did not differ significantly from other patients with an FA in terms of basic demographic and clinicopathological data including mean age (~38 years), gender distribution (~3 females:1 male), and tumor size (~3.5 cm). Distribution of tumor stages in TCs harbouring a RAS mutation was as follows: stage I: 3 micro PTCs, 2 FTCs, 1 PTC and 6 FVPTCs; stage II: 1 FVPTC; stage III: 1 FVPTC; stage IV: 1 PTC and 2 NWDTCs. All RAS and BRAF mutations proved to be mutational exclusive.

Discussion

Gain-of-function mutations in the hotspot regions of the RAS genes in the vast majority of cases affect either codon 12, 13, or 61, or, with far lesser prevalence, codon 59. These mutations result in inhibition of GTP hydrolysis, either by diminishing GTPase activity, or, in the case of codon 59 point-mutations, by modulating the rate of guanine nucleotide exchange (4). Although the frequency of RAS mutations varies among different cancer types, a number of studies has shown that mutations in NRAS codon 61 predominate in follicular thyroid lesions over other RAS mutations (5, 18, 19). In particular, a glutamine-to-arginine substitution (CAA→CGA; Q61R) is the most common form, followed by a glutamine to lysine substitution (CAA→AAA; Q61K) (5, 20). In vivo experiments demonstrated that GTP hydrolysis is strongly inhibited by direct RAS/RAF interaction in Q61L and Q61K mutants, resulting in dysregulation of the pathway (21). The dominant mutational variant in thyroid tumors, Q61R, exhibits a transforming capacity similar to Q61L and Q61K mutants (22).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Homology modeling of KRAS residues 41-80 including, highlighted side chains at the critical mutational region. Structural models of the entire KRAS proteins (wild-type, A59del, and Q61R) were predicted by I-TASSER and taken as templates. Figures made by PyMOL. A: A59del (green) aligned with wild-type (red). B: Q61R (blue) aligned with wild-type (red).

In comparison to BRAF mutations, which are virtually absent in non-malignant thyroid lesions (Table I), RAS mutations occur with varying frequency in malignant as well as non-malignant thyroid lesions and are preferentially associated with follicular histology. Consistent with this, RAS mutations, and in particular KRAS and NRAS codon 61 mutations, in PTC are typically associated with the follicular variant (20, 23-25). A molecular genetics study on FVPTC has shown that this variant shares genetic alterations with both FTC and conventional PTC, i.e. mutations involving BRAF exon 15 and NRAS codon 61, as well as gene fusions of rearranged during transfection (RET) with different partner genes and gene fusions of paired box-8 with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PAX8-PPARγ) (26). A recent population-based survey on the clinical behaviour of FVPTC found that this variant accounts for about one third of all PTCs and represents a clinically unique entity, with features shared with PTC and FTC (27).

The association of RAS mutations with progressive tumour features is controversially discussed. Whereas a number of studies found correlation of RAS mutations with tumour progression in FTC and PTC (18, 28), other studies correlated RAS mutations with encapsulated rather than with infiltrative FVPTC (20, 25, 29). In contrast, BRAF mutations are commonly associated with infiltrative tumours (25). The association of RAS mutations with clinicopathological features in NWDTC seems to be different as these tumors are frequently aneuploidous (30). In the case of radioiodine-refractory thyroid tumours, the RAS mutational status may gain clinical importance as those with a RAS mutation are likely to respond well to the newly-developed MAPK kinase (MEK)1 and MEK2 inhibitor Selumetinib (31).

No HT was found to have a RAS mutation in our case series. These findings coincide with those of other studies indicating that HT can be clearly distinguished from PTC by the absence of any RAS mutation (32, 33). The frequency of RAS mutations in histologically-examined nodular goiters varies between the studies, i.e. 0% (out of 49 cases) (34-36), 4% (1/25 NRAS c61) (37), 7% (1/46 HRAS c13, 1/46 KRAS c12, 1/46 NRAS c61) in this study, 10% (1/10 KRAS c13) (38), 21% (4/19 HRAS c12) (39), 25% (1/5 KRAS c13) (40). Of note, in contrast to thyroid tumors with follicular histology, the majority of goiters in these studies exhibited mutations in RAS codons 12 and 13, i.e. five HRAS and three KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 in contrast to two NRAS codon 61 mutations.

The molecular pathogenesis of FA and its role in histopathogenesis of TC has not been fully-elucidated yet. It has been hypothesized that a subset of FAs bearing atypical nuclear features of TC with follicular histology and are characterized by NRAS codon 61 mutations may be regarded as precursor lesions of their malignant counterparts (41). Yet studies directly comparing the frequency of RAS mutations amongst thyroid lesions with follicular histology are rare (19, 42). We assume that FAs with a RAS mutation may represent precursor lesions for their malignant counterparts; however, a fraction of FVPTCs harbouring a BRAF mutation (17% in our study) may not develop through the FA sequence and undergo different histopathogenesis.

The newly-identified KRAS A59del in an FA in our study series affects the GTPase domain. Mutations in KRAS codon 59 are found sporadically in a number of solid and haematological types of cancer and are commonly point-mutations resulting in A59E, A59T, or A59G substitutions (8). The KRAS A59del places the glycine residue of codon 60 into the position of codon 59 and the glutamate residue of codon 62 into the position of codon 61. Further studies are needed to reveal if these substitutions bear similar functional properties as the known KRAS A59G and Q61E point-mutations. An initial protein structure and homology alignment prediction assumes that the orientation of side chains of critical amino acids in the mutational region is impaired in the A59del variant (Figure 2).

Conclusion

In conclusion, RAS mutations, and in particular NRAS codon 61 mutations, are preferentially associated with follicular-patterned thyroid lesions, supporting the hypothesis that benign variants with a RAS mutation may represent precursor lesions for their malignant counterparts. In view of the fact that RAS mutations are common in follicular-patterned TCs, screening for RAS mutations in patients with advanced tumors may advance clinical relevance. The novel KRAS A59del detected in an FA is one of the first single codon deletions reported so far for a mutational hotspot region of a RAS gene.

Acknowledgements

We thank Nadia Bagation, Ohoud Subhi, and Ibtesam Bagalab for her excellent technical assistance. This study was supported by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) grants 09-BIO707-03 and 09-BIO820-03.

  • Received August 28, 2013.
  • Revision received September 30, 2013.
  • Accepted October 1, 2013.
  • Copyright© 2013 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bounacer A,
    2. McGregor A,
    3. Skinner J,
    4. Bond J,
    5. Poghosyan Z,
    6. Wynford-Thomas D
    : Mutant RAS-induced proliferation of human thyroid epithelial cells requires three effector pathways. Oncogene 23: 7839-7845, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Miller MS,
    2. Miller LD
    : RAS Mutations and oncogenesis: Not all RAS mutations are created equally. Front Genet 2: 100, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. McCubrey JA,
    2. Steelman LS,
    3. Chappell WH,
    4. Abrams SL,
    5. Montalto G,
    6. Cervello M,
    7. Nicoletti F,
    8. Fagone P,
    9. Malaponte G,
    10. Mazzarino MC,
    11. Candido S,
    12. Libra M,
    13. Basecke J,
    14. Mijatovic S,
    15. Maksimovic-Ivanic D,
    16. Milella M,
    17. Tafuri A,
    18. Cocco L,
    19. Evangelisti C,
    20. Chiarini F,
    21. Martelli AM
    : Mutations and deregulation of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR cascades which alter therapy response. Oncotarget 3: 954-987, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Castellano E,
    2. Santos E
    : Functional specificity of RAS isoforms: So similar but so different. Genes Cancer 2: 216-231, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Prior IA,
    2. Lewis PD,
    3. Mattos C
    : A comprehensive survey of RAS mutations in cancer. Cancer Res 72: 2457-2467, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Fernandez-Medarde A,
    2. Santos E
    : RAS in cancer and developmental diseases. Genes Cancer 2: 344-358, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Pylayeva-Gupta Y,
    2. Grabocka E,
    3. Bar-Sagi D
    : RAS oncogenes: Weaving a tumorigenic web. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 761-774, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Forbes SA,
    2. Bindal N,
    3. Bamford S,
    4. Cole C,
    5. Kok CY,
    6. Beare D,
    7. Jia M,
    8. Shepherd R,
    9. Leung K,
    10. Menzies A,
    11. Teague JW,
    12. Campbell PJ,
    13. Stratton MR,
    14. Futreal PA
    : COSMIC: Mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D945-950, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Moura MM,
    2. Cavaco BM,
    3. Pinto AE,
    4. Leite V
    : High prevalence of RAS mutations in RET-negative sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96: E863-868, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Buhrman G,
    2. O'Connor C,
    3. Zerbe B,
    4. Kearney BM,
    5. Napoleon R,
    6. Kovrigina EA,
    7. Vajda S,
    8. Kozakov D,
    9. Kovrigin EL,
    10. Mattos C
    : Analysis of binding site hot spots on the surface of RAS GTPase. J Mol Biol 413: 773-789, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Schulten HJ,
    2. Salama S,
    3. Al-Mansouri Z,
    4. Alotibi R,
    5. Al-Ghamdi K,
    6. Al-Hamour OA,
    7. Sayadi H,
    8. Al-Aradati H,
    9. Al-Johari A,
    10. Huwait E,
    11. Gari M,
    12. Al-Qahtani MH,
    13. Al-Maghrabi J
    : BRAF mutations in thyroid tumors from an ethnically diverse group. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 10: 10, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. DeLellis RA,
    2. Lloyd RV,
    3. Heitz PU,
    4. Eng C
    1. DeLellis RA,
    2. Williams ED
    : Thyroid and parathyroid tumors. In: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. IARC WHO Classification of Tumours. DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, Eng C (eds.). Lyons, France: IARC Press, pp. 51-56, 2004.
  13. ↵
    1. Edge SB,
    2. Byrd DR,
    3. Compton CC,
    4. Fritz AG,
    5. Greene FL,
    6. Trotti A
    (eds.). AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edition. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 87-96, 2010.
  14. ↵
    1. Schulten HJ,
    2. Al-Maghrabi J,
    3. Al-Ghamdi K,
    4. Salama S,
    5. Al-Muhayawi S,
    6. Chaudhary A,
    7. Hamour O,
    8. Abuzenadah A,
    9. Gari M,
    10. Al-Qahtani M
    : Mutational screening of RET, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, AKT1, and CTNNB1 in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Anticancer Res 31: 4179-4183, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. McGinnis S,
    2. Madden TL
    : BLAST: At the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W20-25, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Roy A,
    2. Kucukural A,
    3. Zhang Y
    : I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 5: 725-738, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. DeLano W
    : The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA. http://www.pymol.org.2002.
  18. ↵
    1. Fukahori M,
    2. Yoshida A,
    3. Hayashi H,
    4. Yoshihara M,
    5. Matsukuma S,
    6. Sakuma Y,
    7. Koizume S,
    8. Okamoto N,
    9. Kondo T,
    10. Masuda M,
    11. Miyagi Y
    : The associations between RAS mutations and clinical characteristics in follicular thyroid tumors: New insights from a single center and a large patient cohort. Thyroid 22: 683-689, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Nikiforov YE
    : Molecular analysis of thyroid tumors. Mod Pathol 24(Suppl 2): S34-43, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Zhu Z,
    2. Gandhi M,
    3. Nikiforova MN,
    4. Fischer AH,
    5. Nikiforov YE
    : Molecular profile and clinical-pathologic features of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. An unusually high prevalence of RAS mutations. Am Clin Pathol 120: 71-77, 2003.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Buhrman G,
    2. Wink G,
    3. Mattos C
    : Transformation efficiency of RASQ61 mutants linked to structural features of the switch regions in the presence of RAF. Structure 15: 1618-1629, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Der CJ,
    2. Finkel T,
    3. Cooper GM
    : Biological and biochemical properties of human RASH genes mutated at codon 61. Cell 44: 167-176, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Di Cristofaro J,
    2. Marcy M,
    3. Vasko V,
    4. Sebag F,
    5. Fakhry N,
    6. Wynford-Thomas D,
    7. De Micco C
    : Molecular genetic study comparing follicular variant versus classic papillary thyroid carcinomas: Association of N-RAS mutation in codon 61 with follicular variant. Hum Pathol 37: 824-830, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Adeniran AJ,
    2. Zhu Z,
    3. Gandhi M,
    4. Steward DL,
    5. Fidler JP,
    6. Giordano TJ,
    7. Biddinger PW,
    8. Nikiforov YE
    : Correlation between genetic alterations and microscopic features, clinical manifestations, and prognostic characteristics of thyroid papillary carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 30: 216-222, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Rivera M,
    2. Ricarte-Filho J,
    3. Knauf J,
    4. Shaha A,
    5. Tuttle M,
    6. Fagin JA,
    7. Ghossein RA
    : Molecular genotyping of papillary thyroid carcinoma follicular variant according to its histological subtypes (encapsulated vs. infiltrative) reveals distinct BRAF and RAS mutation patterns. Mod Pathol 23: 1191-1200, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Santarpia L,
    2. Myers JN,
    3. Sherman SI,
    4. Trimarchi F,
    5. Clayman GL,
    6. El-Naggar AK
    : Genetic alterations in the RAS/RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathways in the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 116: 2974-2983, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Yu XM,
    2. Schneider DF,
    3. Leverson G,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Sippel RS
    : Follicular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma is a Unique Clinical Entity: A Population-Based Study of 10,740 Cases. Thyroid 23: 1263-1268, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Garcia-Rostan G,
    2. Zhao H,
    3. Camp RL,
    4. Pollan M,
    5. Herrero A,
    6. Pardo J,
    7. Wu R,
    8. Carcangiu ML,
    9. Costa J,
    10. Tallini G
    : RAS mutations are associated with aggressive tumor phenotypes and poor prognosis in thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol 21: 3226-3235, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Singh B,
    3. Tallini G,
    4. Carlson DL,
    5. Katabi N,
    6. Shaha A,
    7. Tuttle RM,
    8. Ghossein RA
    : Follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: A clinicopathologic study of a problematic entity. Cancer 107: 1255-1264, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Pinto AE,
    2. Silva G,
    3. Banito A,
    4. Leite V,
    5. Soares J
    : Aneuploidy and high S-phase as biomarkers of poor clinical outcome in poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Oncol Rep 20: 913-919, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Ho AL,
    2. Grewal RK,
    3. Leboeuf R,
    4. Sherman EJ,
    5. Pfister DG,
    6. Deandreis D,
    7. Pentlow KS,
    8. Zanzonico PB,
    9. Haque S,
    10. Gavane S,
    11. Ghossein RA,
    12. Ricarte-Filho JC,
    13. Dominguez JM,
    14. Shen R,
    15. Tuttle RM,
    16. Larson SM,
    17. Fagin JA
    : Selumetinib-enhanced radioiodine uptake in advanced thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med 368: 623-632, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Sadow PM,
    2. Heinrich MC,
    3. Corless CL,
    4. Fletcher JA,
    5. Nose V
    : Absence of BRAF, NRAS, KRAS, HRAS mutations, and RET/PTC gene rearrangements distinguishes dominant nodules in Hashimoto thyroiditis from papillary thyroid carcinomas. Endocr Pathol 21: 73-79, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kang DY,
    2. Kim KH,
    3. Kim JM,
    4. Kim SH,
    5. Kim JY,
    6. Baik HW,
    7. Kim YS
    : High prevalence of RET, RAS, and ERK expression in Hashimoto's thyroiditis and in papillary thyroid carcinoma in the Korean population. Thyroid 17: 1031-1038, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Park KY,
    2. Koh JM,
    3. Kim YI,
    4. Park HJ,
    5. Gong G,
    6. Hong SJ,
    7. Ahn IM
    : Prevalences of Gs alpha, ras, p53 mutations and ret/PTC rearrangement in differentiated thyroid tumours in a Korean population. Clin Endocrinol 49: 317-323, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu RT,
    2. Hou CY,
    3. You HL,
    4. Huang CC,
    5. Hock L,
    6. Chou FF,
    7. Wang PW,
    8. Cheng JT
    : Selective occurrence of RAS mutations in benign and malignant thyroid follicular neoplasms in Taiwan. Thyroid 14: 616-621, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Ezzat S,
    2. Zheng L,
    3. Kolenda J,
    4. Safarian A,
    5. Freeman JL,
    6. Asa SL
    : Prevalence of activating RAS mutations in morphologically characterized thyroid nodules. Thyroid 6: 409-416, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Esapa CT,
    2. Johnson SJ,
    3. Kendall-Taylor P,
    4. Lennard TW,
    5. Harris PE
    : Prevalence of RAS mutations in thyroid neoplasia. Clin Endocrinol 50: 529-535, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Capella G,
    2. Matias-Guiu X,
    3. Ampudia X,
    4. de Leiva A,
    5. Perucho M,
    6. Prat J
    : RAS oncogene mutations in thyroid tumors: Polymerase chain reaction-restriction-fragment-length polymorphism analysis from paraffin-embedded tissues. Diagn Mol Pathol 5: 45-52, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Namba H,
    2. Rubin SA,
    3. Fagin JA
    : Point mutations of RAS oncogenes are an early event in thyroid tumorigenesis. Mol Endocrinol 4: 1474-1479, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Horie H,
    2. Yokogoshi Y,
    3. Tsuyuguchi M,
    4. Saito S
    : Point mutations of RAS and Gs alpha subunit genes in thyroid tumors. Jpn J Cancer Res 86: 737-742, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Vasko V,
    2. Ferrand M,
    3. Di Cristofaro J,
    4. Carayon P,
    5. Henry JF,
    6. de Micco C
    : Specific pattern of RAS oncogene mutations in follicular thyroid tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 2745-2752, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Riesco-Eizaguirre G,
    2. Santisteban P
    : New insights in thyroid follicular cell biology and its impact in thyroid cancer therapy. Endocr Relat Cancer 14: 957-977, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 33 (11)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 11
November 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comprehensive Survey of HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS Mutations in Proliferative Thyroid Lesions from An Ethnically Diverse Population
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comprehensive Survey of HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS Mutations in Proliferative Thyroid Lesions from An Ethnically Diverse Population
HANS-JUERGEN SCHULTEN, SHERINE SALAMA, ALAA AL-AHMADI, ZUHOOR AL-MANSOURI, ZEENAT MIRZA, KHALID AL-GHAMDI, OSMAN ABDEL AL-HAMOUR, ETIMAD HUWAIT, MAMDOOH GARI, MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN AL-QAHTANI, JAUDAH AL-MAGHRABI
Anticancer Research Nov 2013, 33 (11) 4779-4784;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Comprehensive Survey of HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS Mutations in Proliferative Thyroid Lesions from An Ethnically Diverse Population
HANS-JUERGEN SCHULTEN, SHERINE SALAMA, ALAA AL-AHMADI, ZUHOOR AL-MANSOURI, ZEENAT MIRZA, KHALID AL-GHAMDI, OSMAN ABDEL AL-HAMOUR, ETIMAD HUWAIT, MAMDOOH GARI, MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN AL-QAHTANI, JAUDAH AL-MAGHRABI
Anticancer Research Nov 2013, 33 (11) 4779-4784;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • ROS-induced near-homozygous genomes in thyroid cancer
  • DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: High-yield thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: an update focused on ancillary techniques improving its accuracy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Expression of YAP1 and TAZ in Melanoma-, Bronchial- and Breast Carcinoma Brain Metastasis: Primary vs. Relapsed Tumors
  • Correlation Analysis Between IFIT2 and HLA Class II in Oral Cancer
  • Combination of Recombinant Methioninase With Rapamycin or Chloroquine Is Synergistic to Highly Inhibit Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cells In Vitro
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • HRAS, KRAS and NRAS mutations
  • KRAS codon 59 deletion
  • BRAF mutations
  • follicular-patterned thyroid lesions
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire