Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Case ReportClinical Studies

Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone Position for Esophageal Cancer with Right Aortic Arch: Case Report

SHINGO KANAJI, TETSU NAKAMURA, YASUNORI OTOWA, MASASHI YAMAMOTO, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA, TATSUYA IMANISHI, YASUO SUMI, SATOSHI SUZUKI, KENICHI TANAKA and YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI
Anticancer Research October 2013, 33 (10) 4515-4519;
SHINGO KANAJI
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kanashin{at}med.kobe-u.ac.jp
TETSU NAKAMURA
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUNORI OTOWA
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASASHI YAMAMOTO
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TATSUYA IMANISHI
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUO SUMI
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SATOSHI SUZUKI
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENICHI TANAKA
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A congenital anomaly of the right aortic arch (RAA) is rare, and esophageal cancer associated with the vascular ring is even more rare. In such cases, it is very important to understand the anatomical situation in the upper mediastinum in order to perform a safe and curative operation. A 52-year-old man who presented with odynophagia was admitted to our department after a diagnosis of advanced esophageal cancer. Chest computed tomography revealed an RAA with an aberrant subclavian artery and showed that the esophagus was completely encircled by the RAA, aortic diverticulum, and pulmonary artery. By the thoracoscopic view with the patient in the prone position, we were able to easily and safely identify the anatomical location of the upper mediastinum and successfully perform thoracoscopic esophagectomy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient undergoing total thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position without thoracotomy.

  • Right aortic arch
  • esophageal cancer
  • thoracoscopic esophagectomy
  • prone position

Esophageal carcinoma associated with a right aortic arch (RAA) is very rare (1, 2). In such cases, it is extremely important to recognize the anatomical situation in the upper mediastinum because of vessel and nervous system anomalies. To date, only approximately 30 such resected cases have been reported (3). Almost all of the previously reported cases of esophageal cancer with an RAA underwent open left thoracotomy, with the exception of one patient who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with a 5-cm minithoracotomy in the right lateral decubitus position (3). Here, we report on a patient with thoracic esophageal cancer with an RAA who underwent successful resection by thoracoscopy with the left approach while in the prone position. A previous report suggested that a thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the right approach with the patient in the prone position increased operative exposure and improved surgical ergonomics compared to the left lateral decubitus position (4). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient undergoing total thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position without thoracotomy. We were easily able to identify the unusual anatomical location of upper mediastinum by this procedure.

Case Report

A 52-year-old man visited a local physician with the complaint of odynophagia in December 2012. He was referred to our Department after a diagnosis of esophageal cancer was made from an upper gastrointestinal series.

Chest X-ray showed that the aortic arch was on the right side. Barium radiography revealed right indentations in the upper thoracic esophagus at the point of the aortic arch, and a 3-cm irregular ulcerated lesion with marginal elevation was seen in the lower thoracic esophagus involving almost half the circumference of the esophageal wall (Figure 1A). Esophagoscopy showed an ulcerated localized lesion that covered almost one third of the circumference of the esophageal wall at a point 35-38 cm from the incisors (Figure 1B).

Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a circumferential wall thickening 3 cm in length in the lower thoracic esophagus. Perigastric lymph node metastases were detected. There were no metastases in the lung and liver.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A: Barium esophagography showing an ulcerated lesion in the lower third of the esophagus (arrowhead). B: Esophagoscopy showing a depressed lesion located at the lower third of the esophagus.

Three-dimensional CT showed an RAA and aortic diverticulum, known as Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) (Figure 2A). Since the presence of an RAA was demonstrated with an aberrant subclavian artery, it was classified as an aortic arch anomaly of type II according to the Stewart classification (or type IIIB1 according to the Edward classification) (Figure 3) (5, 6). As the left ductus arteriosus (LDA) between the KD and pulmonary artery (PA) was not enhanced and detected on CT, we consider that there was no blood flow in the LDA.

From the findings described above, a diagnosis of advanced esophageal cancer (T3N2M0 stage IIIA according to the TNM classiffication version 7) (7), associated with an RAA was made. The patient underwent two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil, followed by esophagectomy with lymph node dissection.

Surgical findings. Under general anesthesia and using a single-lumen endotracheal tube with bronchial blocker for single-lung ventilation, the patient was initially placed in a prone position. All surgeons stood on the left side of the patient, and a video monitor was set up on the opposite side. A 12-mm blunt trocar was inserted into the seventh intercostal space (ICS) behind the posterior axillary line. Another three trocars were inserted under thoracoscopic control: a 5-mm trocar in the third ICS behind the midaxillary line, a 5-mm trocar in the fifth ICS on the posterior axillary line, and a 12-mm trocar in the ninth ICS on the scapular angle line (Figure 4, black circles). We added two trocars to obtain a better surgical view in the upper mediastinum: a 3-mm trocar in the sixth ICS and a 12-mm trocar in the eighth ICS on the scapular angle line (Figure 4, white circles). Carbon dioxide pneumothorax was achieved at a pressure of 6 mmHg to collapse the right lung and to expand the mediastinum. As was observed under preoperative 3D-CT imaging, the thoracoscope revealed that the trachea and esophagus were completely encircled by a vascular ring (Figure 5A). The left recurrent laryngeal nerve (LRLN), and LDA were easily recognized by dissection along the left vagus nerve to the foot side. The LRLN passed behind the LDA and ascended posteriorly (Figure 5B). After the lymphadenectomy around the LRLN, we carefully exposed the LDA between the KD and PA. The trachea was rolled back carefully and firmly to the left and ventrally by the assistant's grasper that held a small gauze to explore the LDA and the PA. The LDA was cut after clipping without injury to the surrounding vessels (Figure 5C). After cutting the LDA, the upper thoracic esophagus was easily released from the vascular ring (Figure 5D), and we performed subtotal esophagectomy. The patient was then turned to the supine position, and we began open laparotomy. Celiac and perigastric lymph node dissection was performed, after which a 3-cm wide gastric conduit was made extracorporeally by an automatic suturing instrument. Subsequently, the cervical lymphadenectomy was performed through a cervical collar incision. We intended to use the retrosternal route for reconstruction. Since the upper sternum was pulled forward by the anomaly of the left brachiocephalic artery, we could not ensure that the retrosternal space was adequate. Because of fear that the gastric conduit would be strongly compressed, the patient underwent the reconstruction through an antero-thoracic wall route.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

A: Three-dimensional computed tomography showing a right aortic arch accompanied by Kommerell's diverticulum. B: Schematic illustration of the mediastinal structure in the present case.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Classification of the right aortic arch by Stewart et al. (6). LSA: Left subclavian artery, RSA: right subclavian artery, RCCA: right common carotid artery, LCCA: left common carotid artery.

Histological findings showed moderately-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma within adventitia layer and perigastric lymph node metastases. According to the TNM classiffication version 7, this tumor was T3N2M0 stage IIIA.

The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful. On postoperative day 1, the endotracheal tube was extracted. On postoperative day 7, the patient began to take food orally. About 24 days after surgery, he was discharged. At 2 months after surgery, he is currently visiting a hospital as an outpatient.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Sites of the four trocars (black circles), and two additional trocars (white circles). Roman numerals show the rib number. MA: Midaxillary line, PA: posterior axillary line.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Thoracoscopic view of the upper mediastinum at esophagectomy. KD: Kommerell's diverticulum, LVN: left vagus nerve, LRLN: left recurrent laryngeal nerve, LDA: left ductus arteriosus.

Discussion

An RAA is a rare condition and is reported to affect 1-2 in 1,500 persons in Japan (1) or 0.03-0.04% of autopsy cases in Western countries (2). In patients with an RAA, the aorta surrounds the esophagus and trachea, causing compression and deviation of these structures, as well as deviation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Because of such deviations and compression, great care must be taken when esophageal cancer is treated surgically in these patients.

Edwards et al. identified three types of aortic anomalies based on a theoretical concept of the development of the aortic arch (5), RAA belongs to group III of this classification, and our case was type IIIB1. Stewart et al. (6) also showed that the RAA could in turn be divided into three subtypes (Figure 3). According to Stewart et al.'s classification, our case was type II in that the LRLN ran around one side of the LDA.

Although the most common approach for resection of esophageal cancer is right thoracotomy, it was not used in any of the patients with RAA previously reported. Left thoracotomy has been reported to give a better view into the mediastinum for esophagectomy in patients with an RAA, because the RAA and right-sided descending aorta interface with the mobilization of the esophagus located at the left side of the RAA through a right thoracotomy. In thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer with an RAA, we also used the left approach with the prone position.

For adequate dissection of lymph nodes around the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RRLN) through a left thoracotomy alone, a midline sternotomy should be added (8) or a left-open door method should be used (9) to make the operation as curative as possible. In our case, it was difficult to recognize the RRLN and surrounding tissue even with a magnified thoracoscopic view due to interference by the descending aorta. Since in the present case the chest CT showed no evidence of lymph node metastasis around the RRLN, we did not perform curative lymph node dissection along the RRLN, considering that sternotomy or a left-open door method would add unnecessary stress.

In 1994, Cuschieri et al. first reported on thoracic surgery performed in six patients placed in the prone position (10). More recently, Palanivelu et al. reported their experience with 130 patients treated by thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position and stimulated new interest in this approach (11). Fabian et al. reported that thoracoscopic esophagectomy with the right approach with the patient in the prone position increased operative exposure, improved surgeon ergonomics, and shortened operative time compared with surgery from the left lateral decubitus position (4). At our institute, thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed by the right approach with the patient in the prone position was first applied for resectable esophageal cancer in January 2010 and thereafter has been performed safely in about 130 patients with esophageal cancer. From the prone position, mediastinal organs and structures were exposed spontaneously by both gravity and artificial pneumothorax without any help from an assistant. The lung fell away with or without minimal handling. In addition, the surgeon's wrists and shoulder joints were in a neutral position in relation to the forearms and upper arms, minimizing fatigue and maximizing ergonomic function. The view of one monitor standing in a single line to the operative field and the improved surgeon ergonomics contributed to better hand-eye coordination. The identification and management of the LDA is most important in order to release the upper thoracic esophagus in surgery for esophageal cancer with an RAA, especially in type II according to Stewart et al.'s classification in which the esophagus is completely encircled by arteries. An insufficient view of the upper mediastinum may cause critical injury of the KD and the PA. In the present case, we were easily able to identify the LRLN, LDA, and PA. The LRLN passed behind the LD and ascended posteriorly. The length of the connection of LDA with the KD and PD was short, approximately only 0.5 inches. The LDA was adequately divided at origins of both the KD and PA. Subsequently, the LDA was cut after clipping with a magnified operative view and good surgeon ergonomics without mini-thoracotomy. After cutting the LDA, we were easily able to release the upper thoracic esophagus from the vascular ring and perform the esophagectomy.

We successfully performed a total thoracoscopic esophagectomy with the patient in the prone position. We consider that this procedure is useful for esophageal cancer with an RAA, especially from the safety viewpoint of identification and management around the LDA.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received July 20, 2013.
  • Revision received September 11, 2013.
  • Accepted September 12, 2013.
  • Copyright© 2013 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ito K,
    2. Kogure K,
    3. Hayashi S,
    4. Kaneko R,
    5. Shimada M,
    6. Tsufuhisa M,
    7. Kusama K
    : MR imaging analysis of compression and deviation for esophagus and trachea in right aortic arch. Nippon Igaku Housyasen Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Radiol Soc) 56: 89-93, 1996.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Hastreiter AR,
    2. D'cruz IA,
    3. Cantez T,
    4. Namin EP,
    5. Licata R
    : Right-sided aorta. Br Heart J 28: 722-739, 1996.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Kubo N,
    2. Ohira M,
    3. Lee T,
    4. Sakurai K,
    5. Toyokawa T,
    6. Tanaka H,
    7. Muguruma K,
    8. Kimura K,
    9. Nagahara H,
    10. Noda E,
    11. Amano R,
    12. Ohtani H,
    13. Yamashita Y,
    14. Yashiro M,
    15. Maeda K,
    16. Hirakawa K
    : Successful resection of esophageal cancer with right aortic arch by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A case report. Anticancer Res 33: 1635-1640, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Fabian T,
    2. Martin J,
    3. Katigbak M,
    4. McKelvey AA,
    5. Federico JA
    : Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22: 2485-2491, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Stewart JR,
    2. Kincaid OW,
    3. Edwards JE
    : Malformations with right aortic arch (group 1). An Atlas of Vascular Rings and Related Malformations of the Aortic Arch System. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas, pp. 80-121, 1964.
  6. ↵
    1. Stewart JR,
    2. Kincaid OW,
    3. Titus JL
    : Right aortic arch: Plain film diagnosis and significance. Am J Roentgenol 97: 377-389, 1966.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Sobin L,
    2. Gaspodadarowicz M,
    3. Wittekind C
    . TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 7th ed. New York, Wiley-Blackwell, Inc., 2009.
  8. ↵
    1. Kinoshita Y,
    2. Udagawa H,
    3. Kajiyama Y,
    4. Tsutsumi K,
    5. Ueno M,
    6. Nakamura T,
    7. Akiyama H,
    8. Tsurumaru M
    : Esophageal cancer and right aortic arch associated with a vascular ring. Dis Esophagus 12: 216-218, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Noguchi H,
    2. Naomoto Y,
    3. Haisa M,
    4. Yamatsuji T,
    5. Shigemitsu K,
    6. Ohkawa T,
    7. Nobuhisa T,
    8. Ono R,
    9. Gunduz M,
    10. Tanaka N
    : Esophageal cancer associated with right aortic arch: Report of two cases. Dis Esophagus 16: 332-334, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cuschieri A
    : Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2: 21-25, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Palanivelu C,
    2. Prakash A,
    3. Senthikumar R,
    4. Senthilnathan P,
    5. Parthasarathi R,
    6. Rajan PS,
    7. Venkatachlam S
    : Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position–experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203: 7-16, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 10
October 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone Position for Esophageal Cancer with Right Aortic Arch: Case Report
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone Position for Esophageal Cancer with Right Aortic Arch: Case Report
SHINGO KANAJI, TETSU NAKAMURA, YASUNORI OTOWA, MASASHI YAMAMOTO, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA, TATSUYA IMANISHI, YASUO SUMI, SATOSHI SUZUKI, KENICHI TANAKA, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI
Anticancer Research Oct 2013, 33 (10) 4515-4519;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone Position for Esophageal Cancer with Right Aortic Arch: Case Report
SHINGO KANAJI, TETSU NAKAMURA, YASUNORI OTOWA, MASASHI YAMAMOTO, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA, TATSUYA IMANISHI, YASUO SUMI, SATOSHI SUZUKI, KENICHI TANAKA, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI
Anticancer Research Oct 2013, 33 (10) 4515-4519;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Thoracoscopic Oesophagectomy Using Prone Positioning for Oesophageal Cancer With Right Aortic Arch: A Case Report
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Short-term and Long-term Outcomes of Prophylactic Corticosteroid in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Remarkable and Durable Tumor Response to Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced dMMR/MSI-H Rectal Cancer
  • Body Weight Loss at Recurrence as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Recurrent Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy Who Receive First-line Treatment After Recurrence
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • right aortic arch
  • esophageal cancer
  • thoracoscopic esophagectomy
  • prone position
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire