Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Musculoskeletal Sarcomas in the Forearm and Hand: Standard Treatment and Microsurgical Reconstruction for Limb Salvage

KEIICHI MURAMATSU, KOICHIRO IHARA, KOJI YOSHIDA, YASUHIRO TOMINAGA, TAKAHIRO HASHIMOTO and TOSHIHIKO TAGUCHI
Anticancer Research October 2013, 33 (10) 4175-4182;
KEIICHI MURAMATSU
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: muramatu{at}yamaguchi-u.ac.jp
KOICHIRO IHARA
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanmon Medical Center, Yamaguchi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOJI YOSHIDA
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUHIRO TOMINAGA
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAHIRO HASHIMOTO
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOSHIHIKO TAGUCHI
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sarcomas in the forearm and hand are very rare, accounting for less than 1% of all upper-limb tumors and clinical outcomes after surgery and adjuvant therapies are uncertain. The forearm and hand present specific challenges due to their unique anatomical structures. There is little soft tissue and each compartment is narrow, such important structures exist in close proximity. Anatomic constraints make it difficult to achieve wide surgical margins. Although sarcomas often metastasize to the lung, the overall survival rate is excellent. Wide marginal resection during initial surgery is the most predictive factor for tumor control. The role of reconstructive surgery following wide excision for sarcoma of the forearm and hand is even more important than elsewhere in the body because excision is likely to cause bone, tendon and nerve defects, leading to severe functional deficits. Multiple options exist for bony and soft tissue reconstruction of the upper limb, with the choice dependent upon tumor type, wound characteristics, surgeon preference and the patients' functional requirements. Success should be measured not just by stable wound coverage but also by preservation of patient's health, limb cosmesis, sensation and function. Careful preoperative planning with consideration of all the possible resected structures should improve patient outcomes.

  • Musculoskeletal tumor
  • forearm
  • hand
  • limb salvage
  • microsurgery
  • tissue transfer
  • review

Local control of sarcoma is best achieved by adequate resection at the primary tumor stage (1). However, the forearm and hand present specific challenges due to their unique anatomical structures. There is little soft tissue and each compartment is narrow and important structures exist in close proximity (2). Anatomic constraints make it difficult to achieve wide surgical margins. Tumors of less than 5 cm that are located in extremities elsewhere, are commonly localized to a single compartment, but this is rare for the forearm and hand (3). Complex functions of the hand are directly impacted by the sacrifice of important structures (Figure 1). Although some authors have previously described surgical treatments and outcomes for soft tissue sarcomas in the upper limb, challenges remain in defining adequate surgical margins and appropriate reconstruction (4-10).

In the present study, we review oncological and functional outcomes for patients with sarcoma of the forearm and hand. The focus of this review article is to discuss standard treatment and the role of microsurgical reconstruction in achieving functional restoration following limb salvage surgery.

Anatomical Consideration of the Distal Upper Extremities

The forearm and hand comprise unique anatomical structures. There are 19 muscles in the forearm, out of which 11 are classified as extensor muscles and eight belong to the flexor group. The forearm is one of the few places in the body where most muscles run in close vicinity to one another and almost in parallel. Most of the muscles originate close to the elbow and extend all the way to the tips of the fingers. The flexor tendons move 3-4 cm longitudinally during flexion and extension. Any grasping, lifting, holding or cupping motion is accomplished by the flexors. The flexor muscles are also responsible for bending the wrists downwards. Several other muscles assist in twisting motions of the forearm. The three major nerves are the median, ulnar and radial, while the two major arteries are the radial and ulnar. The intrinsic muscles of the hand are located in palmar and are innervated by either the median or ulnar nerve (2).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A 61-year-old male with malignant fibrous histiocytoma in the palmar forearm. The forearm and hand present specific challenges due to their unique anatomical structure. Wide surgical resection directly causes significant functional loss because there is little soft tissue and each compartment is narrow, such that important structures exist in close proximity.

Soft-tissue sarcomas arising in the hand or forearm are usually small lesions detected at a relatively early stage due to the paucity of soft tissue in this region. Despite their small size, sarcomas of the hand and forearm tend to be aggressive and are sometimes fatal (11).

Histological Subtypes of Sarcoma of the Distal Upper Extremities

Tumors of the forearm and hand are quite rare and are usually benign. Malignant tumors account for <3% of all upper limb tumors, with sarcomas accounting for <1%. Lohman et al. treated 100 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma in the upper extremity (8). The histological types were malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) in 48% of cases, synovial sarcoma in 11% and liposarcoma in 8%. Similarly, Kim et al. presented 81 cases with osseous and soft tissue sarcomas out, of which MFH comprised 17%, osteosarcoma 10%, synovial cell sarcoma 7% and liposarcoma 6% of cases (6). Talbot et al. presented 55 cases with soft tissue sarcomas of the hand, including nine epithelioid sarcomas, eight MFH, six synovial sarcomas and three liposarcomas (12).

In the studies mentioned so far, the most common histological types appear to be MFH (40%), liposarcoma (15%) and synovial sarcoma (10%). Osseous sarcoma of the forearm and hand is even rarer than soft tissue sarcoma and accounts for about 0.5% of all malignancies in this area and 6% of benign osseous lesions. Chondrosarcoma is the most common sarcoma of the upper limb, especially of the hand (3).

Oncological Outcomes for Sarcomas in the Distal Upper Extremities

The clinical outcome for sarcomas located in the distal extremities is generally thought to be better than for sarcomas arising in the trunk wall. However, only a few studies have focused on sarcoma of the forearm and hand, and hence there is lack of reliable data (Table I).

Popov et al. demonstrated a 5-year overall survival rate of 75% and a 5-year metastasis-free survival rate of 68% in 80 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma of the upper extremities (7). Lohman et al. reported that 66% of cases showed no evidence of disease relapse after 31 months of follow-up (8). Gustafson and Arner reported a 5-year metastasis-free survival rate of 72% in 108 patients (13), while Kim et al. reported a 5-year survival rate of 61% in 71 patients (5).

Daecke et al. described the clinical outcome of 33 patients with osteosarcomas of the peripheral upper extremities (14). The 5-year survival rate was 86% and the event-free survival rate was 65%. In a study by Talbot et al., only three out of 55 (5%) patients with hand sarcoma died because of their tumor (12). Ramanathan et al. collected data on 110 patients with extremity sarcomas and found no significant difference in the clinical outcome of cases with upper vs. lower limb sarcoma, nor between proximal and distal extremity sarcomas (15).

We reviewed 26 patients with osseous and soft-tissue sarcomas, of which 19 were pathologically classified as high-grade tumor and 7 as low-grade. At the time of final follow-up, 22 patients (85%) had no evidence of tumor and two were alive with disease. One patient who had presented with pre-existing lung metastasis died of angiosarcoma 38 months after surgery and another patient died of epithelioid sarcoma of the forearm. The 3-year disease-specific survival rate was 100% and the 5-year rate was 88%, thus demonstrating a good clinical outcome in our series.

Indications for Chemotherapy

It remains controversial as to whether neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy are indicated for patients with sarcoma of the distal upper extremities. To our knowledge, there have not been any publications to demonstrate significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, especially in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Oncological outcomes for sarcomas in the upper extremity.

In the study of Lohman et al., only 27% of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 13% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 7% received both. Only 5% received chemotherapy in the study of Talbot et al. (12). Daecke et al. reviewed 33 patients with osteosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with wide resection of the tumor (14). They reported on a remarkably high rate of patient's survival using multi-agent chemotherapy.

Indication for chemotherapy should be considered in conjunction with tumor staging (16). The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system can be applied to both sarcomas of the bone and soft tissue (17, 18) (Table II). The stages in this system are based on four factors: histological grade, tumor size (more or less than 5 cm), location (superficial or deep) and metastasis (lymph node or distant). We suggest that an AJCC tumor stage of III or more is an indication for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with high-grade tumors, tumor size larger than 5 cm, location in the deep layer, or distant metastasis are indicated for adjuvant chemotherapy. Osteosarcoma is commonly staged as greater than III and therefore indicated for chemotherapy.

The most commonly used anti-tumor agents for soft-tissue sarcoma are adriamycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen we use for soft-tissue sarcoma includes high-dose ifosfamide and adriamycin, while for osteosarcoma, it includes high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin and adriamycin (19).

Adequate Surgical Margins

Recommendations for safe surgical margins in the treatment of forearm and hand sarcomas are still vague and depend on tumor size, location and histological grade (20). Popov et al. reported a higher local recurrence rate of sarcomas of the upper limb compared to those of the lower limb, even though the mean tumor size was smaller in the upper limb (7). This probably reflects the fact that determination of adequate surgical margins is more difficult to achieve in the upper extremity because of the unique anatomical structures.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (6th edition) for sarcomas of the bone and soft tissue.

Surgical margins should never be sacrificed in an attempt to maintain hand function (21). Talbert et al. reviewed 78 patients with soft tissue sarcoma in the distal extremity and recommended 1-cm wide margins and radiation therapy (22). Bray et al. reviewed 25 patients with sarcoma of the forearm and hand and recommended >1 cm margins but without radiation therapy (23). The efficacy of radiation therapy has yet to be proven (15). Our strategy is 2-cm wide margins for high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas and 1 cm margins for low-grade bone tumors. Major nerves are preserved if margins are kept to 1 cm width. Local control is best achieved by adequate treatment of tumors in the primary stage (24). In our series, local recurrence was very low (2/18, 11%) in patients who presented with a primary tumor. Three patients with MFH showed recurrence, probably because of aggressive invasion into the subcutaneous tissue. This type of MFH has been well-documented by Fanburg-Smith et al. (25) and Matsumoto et al. (26) as an infiltrative subtype and a wider margin is required at the initial resection to entirely excise the lesion.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

A 65 year-old-female with malignant fibrous histiocytoma in the palmar forearm. The tumor was treated with wide resection of the flexor muscles and reconstructed by functional gracilis muscle transfer. She can grasp her fingers strongly due to the re-innervated gracilis muscle.

Microsurgical Reconstruction for Massive Soft Tissue and Osteochondral Defects (Table III)

Selection of cutaneous flaps. Careful strategic planning of the surgical procedure is mandatory in order to achieve functional reconstruction of the upper extremity, following tumor resection (27). Wide resection for sarcoma can entail large, deep and complex defects, particularly in patients with advanced-stage lesions. The large volume of the wound and the exposure of important structures such as nerves, vessels, tendons and bone can often necessitate free-tissue transfer. Immediate reconstruction using free-tissue transfer has many advantages compared with conventional wound closure (28). However, only a few articles have described the role of microsurgical reconstruction following resection of sarcomas in the forearm and hand (4, 6, 8, 9).

Earlier studies reported that microvascular tissue transfer and pedicled flaps produced similar functional results (5). In our experience, the pedicled radial forearm flap was a good choice for cases where the major arteries and muscles had not been sacrificed after wide resection (3). Free cutaneous flaps are indicated when the major arteries need to be sacrificed. Free flaps can provide a larger volume of durable and well-vascularized tissue than local or regional flaps. Several options for cutaneous flaps include anterior thigh flap, scapular flap and groin flap (11, 29). Complications in our series were rare and no infections or residual wounds were experienced.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

There are three types of reconstruction of radio-carpal joint using free vascularized fibula graft, arthroplasty (left), and partial (middle) and total arthrodesis (right). If the carpal bones can be preserved, arthroplasty using the fibula head is recommended who are patients of non-heavy manual workers. Proximal carpal arthrodesis should be considered for young patients with high daily activity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Forearm reconstruction after oncological resection.

Neuro-vascularized muscle transfer. Functional neuro-vascularized muscle transfer (FMT) is a beneficial tool for restoring joint movement in cases involving the reconstruction of movement in the affected extremity (28, 30, 31). So far, the clinical application of FMT has been limited mainly to trauma cases (32-34). To our knowledge, there are no published studies on FMT for oncological reconstruction in the forearm, other than from our own work (35, 36). The gracilis muscle is best indicated for FMT (29, 36) (Figure 2). Two of our cases underwent entire resection of the finger extensor and flexor and were treated by FMT using the gracilis muscle. The muscle power recovered to grade 3. Another case underwent entire forearm extensor resection of the tumor and was reconstructed using the latissimus dorsi with a large cutaneous flap. However, the recovery of muscle power was excessive and balance of the flexor muscle was poor. Functional reconstruction of a limited muscle defect is usually an indication for tendon transfer and donor candidates exist in the forearm (37).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

A 61 year-old-man with synovial sarcoma in the thenar muscle was treated with wide resection, index finger transfer to the thumb and peroneal flap. Primary digital ray transposition is a good choice but index-to-thumb transfer frequently results in poor outcome due to emotional difficulty.

Vascularized nerve grafting. The clinical application of vascularized nerve graft (VNG) has also so far been limited to trauma cases (38), with only a few studies focused on musculoskeletal oncology (39). Peripheral nerve defects have conventionally undergone reconstruction using non-vascularized nerve grafts which survive by revascularization from the surrounding tissue. VNGs offer two advantages. Firstly, they have an associated and hence immediate blood supply (40). By avoiding a period of revascularization, this can reduce intra-neural fibrosis secondary to ischemia. Secondly, continuous nutrition of the nerve may promote rapid axonal regeneration, thus reducing the time required for re-innervation of motor end plates and sensory end organs (41).

To our knowledge, Koshima et al. were the first to apply VNG for oncological reconstruction (39). They reported the case of a 28-year-old woman with a rhabdomyosarcoma originating in the biceps. Wide resection of the tumor resulted in a 12-cm length defect of the median nerve and brachial artery. A long vascularized femoral nerve graft based on the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessel was interposed into the median nerve gap. We have treated an interesting case with synovial sarcoma of the wrist. The 8-cm long ulnar nerve defect was reconstructed by vascularized, folded sural nerve graft with the peroneal flap. This patient had excellent nerve regeneration. Because of its low morbidity, we believe the most appropriate donor for VNG is the sural nerve. We suggest that nerve defects of more than 8 cm in length should be reconstructed using VNG.

Microsurgical reconstruction for massive osteochondral defects. The therapeutic goal of bone tumor reconstruction is a one-stage procedure that provides secure bony consolidation and allows for early physical therapy (42). Due to excellent adaptation, a free vascularized fibula graft is the best procedure for forearm bone reconstruction following tumor resection (43). For defects of the distal radius, other reconstructive procedures have been reported, including radial carpal joint reconstruction using fibula head, fibulo-scapho-lunate arthrodesis or total arthrodesis (44-51) (Figure 3). The fibular head transfer along with the shaft is an attractive method to replace the radio-carpal joint, but is technically demanding (50). Usui et al. reviewed six tumor patients with reconstruction using vascularized fibular head grafts (47). The postoperative complications were unexpectedly high and included progressive degenerative changes, bony collapse due to poor vascularity of the fibular head, and volar subluxation resulting from incongruity between the fibular head and the proximal carpal row. This reconstruction should only be considered for patients engaged in light manual work.

If the carpal bones can be preserved, we first recommend fibulo-scapho-lunate arthrodesis using a vascularized fibular shaft graft, especially for young patients with high daily activity. Some wrist motion remains when the mid-carpal joint is preserved (52). This procedure involves a relatively simple technique to obtain good stability and reasonable mobility of the wrist. If the carpal bones cannot be preserved during tumor resection, total wrist fusion using a free vascularized fibula graft is indicated.

Reconstruction of the hand. Reconstruction after wide resection of digital malignant tumors remains a challenge. Small objects tend to fall from grasp through the space left by the missing digit. The adjacent fingers may scissor, further interfering with prehension and distorting the symmetry of the hand (53). For a single, central digit ray defect resulting from tumor resection, the technique of adjacent finger ray transposition such as index-to-middle or little-to-ring finger may be useful for closing the central gap between the remaining fingers (54). A total thumb defect from the base of the carpo-metacarpal joint can be reconstructed by index finger ray transposition (55, 56). Toe-to-thumb transfer or distraction lengthening is indicated for distal defects of the metacarpo-phalangeal joint (57, 58).

In our series, four patients underwent primary reconstruction with adjacent digital ray transposition. Functional results were good to fair in three patients with central ray amputation, but poor in one patient with total thumb resection (Figure 4). All patients experienced emotional difficulty with acceptance of a three-fingered hand. Careful preoperative informed consent may improve postoperative emotional outcomes.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received June 15, 2013.
  • Revision received August 2, 2013.
  • Accepted August 5, 2013.
  • Copyright© 2013 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Trovik CS
    : Local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma. A Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Project. Acta Orthop Scand 72: 1-31, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Netter FH
    : Musculoskeletal System: Anatomy, Physiology, Metabolic Disorders (Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations, Volume 8, Part 1) Third edition, Saunders; New Jersey, pp. 44-74, 1988.
  3. ↵
    1. Muramatsu K,
    2. Ihara K,
    3. Doi K,
    4. Hashimoto T,
    5. Taguchi T
    : Sarcoma in the forearm and hand: Clinical outcomes and microsurgical reconstruction for limb salvage. Ann Plast Surg 62: 28-33, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Saint-Cyr M,
    2. Langstein HN
    : Reconstruction of the hand and upper extremity after tumor resection. J Surg Oncol 94: 490-503, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kim JY,
    2. Youssef A,
    3. Subramanian V,
    4. Rogers BA,
    5. Pollock RE,
    6. Robb GL
    : Upper extremity reconstruction following resection of soft tissue sarcomas: A functional outcomes analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 11: 921-927, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kim JY,
    2. Subramanian V,
    3. Yousef A,
    4. Rogers BA,
    5. Robb GL,
    6. Chang DW
    : Upper extremity limb salvage with microvascular reconstruction in patients with advanced sarcoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 114: 400-408, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Popov P,
    2. Tukiainen E,
    3. Asko-Seljavaara S,
    4. Huuhtanen R,
    5. Virolainen M,
    6. Virkkunen P,
    7. Blomqvist C
    : Soft-tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity: Surgical treatment and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 113: 222-230, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lohman RF,
    2. Nabawi AS,
    3. Reece GP,
    4. Pollock RE,
    5. Evans GR
    : Soft-tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity: A 5-year experience at two institutions emphasizing the role of soft tissue flap reconstruction. Cancer 94: 2256-2264, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Willcox TM,
    2. Smith AA
    : Upper limb free flap reconstruction after tumor resection. Semin Surg Oncol 19: 246-254, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Visuthikosol V,
    2. Kruavit A,
    3. Nitiyanant P,
    4. Pochanugool L,
    5. Ratanatharathorn V
    : Salvage treatment for sarcomas of the hand. Ann Plast Surg 40: 637-640, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Lee N,
    2. Roh S,
    3. Yang K,
    4. Kim J
    : Reconstruction of hand and forearm after sarcoma resection using anterolateral thigh free flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62: 84-86, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Talbot SG,
    2. Athanasian EA,
    3. Cordeiro PG,
    4. Mehrara BJ
    : Soft tissue reconstruction following tumor resection in the hand. Hand Clin 20: 181-202, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Gustafson P,
    2. Arner M
    : Soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity: Descriptive data and outcome in a population-based series of 108 adult patients. J Hand Surg Am 24: 668-674, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Daecke W,
    2. Bielack S,
    3. Martini AK,
    4. Ewerbeck V,
    5. Jürgens H,
    6. Kotz R
    : Osteosarcoma of the hand and forearm: Experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group. Ann Surg Oncol 12: 322-331, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Ramanathan RC,
    2. A'Hern R,
    3. Fisher C,
    4. Thomas JM
    : Prognostic index for extremity soft tissue sarcomas with isolated local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 8: 278-289, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Pisters PW
    : Combined modality treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg Oncol 5: 464-472, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Musculoskeletal Sites. In: American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, sixth ed, Springer, New York, pp185-200, 2002.
  18. ↵
    1. Heck RK Jr..,
    2. Stacy GS,
    3. Flaherty MJ,
    4. Montag AG,
    5. Peabody TD,
    6. Simon MA
    : A comparison study of staging systems for bone sarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415: 64-71, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Krikelis D,
    2. Judson I
    : Role of chemotherapy in the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 10: 249-260, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Herbert SH,
    2. Corn BW,
    3. Solin LJ,
    4. Lanciano RM,
    5. Schultz DJ,
    6. McKenna WG
    : Limb-preserving treatment for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The significance of surgical margins. Cancer 72: 1230-1238, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Upton J,
    2. Kocher MS,
    3. Wolfort FG
    : Reconstruction following resection of malignancies of the upper extremity. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 5: 847-892, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Talbert ML,
    2. Zagars GK,
    3. Sherman NE,
    4. Romsdahl MM
    : Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the wrist, hand, ankle, and foot. Cancer 66: 2482-2491, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Bray PW,
    2. Bell RS,
    3. Bowen CV,
    4. Davis A,
    5. O'Sullivan B
    : Limb salvage surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the forearm and hand. J Hand Surg Am 22: 495-503, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Gibbs CP,
    2. Peabody TD,
    3. Mundt AJ,
    4. Montag AG,
    5. Simon MA
    : Oncological outcomes of operative treatment of subcutaneous soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79: 888-897, 1997.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Fanburg-Smith JC,
    2. Spiro IJ,
    3. Katapuram SV,
    4. Mankin HJ,
    5. Rosenberg AE
    : Infiltrative subcutaneous malignant fibrous histiocytoma: A comparative study with deep malignant fibrous histiocytoma and an observation of biologic behavior. Ann Diagn Pathol 3: 1-10, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Matsumoto S,
    2. Ahmed AR,
    3. Kawaguchi N,
    4. Manabe J,
    5. Matsushita Y
    : Results of surgery for malignant fibrous histiocytomas of soft tissue. Int J Clin Oncol 8: 104-109, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Leit ME,
    2. Tomaino MM
    : Principles of limb salvage surgery of the upper extremity. Hand Clin 20: 167-179, 2004.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Kane JM 3rd.,
    2. Gibbs JF,
    3. McGrath BE,
    4. Loree TR,
    5. Kraybill WG
    : Large, deep high-grade extremity sarcomas: When is a myocutaneous flap reconstruction necessary? Surg Oncol 8: 205-210, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Willcox TM,
    2. Smith AA
    : Upper limb free flap reconstruction after tumor resection. Semin Surg Oncol 19: 246-254, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Muramatsu K,
    2. Ihara K,
    3. Doi K,
    4. Yoshida K,
    5. Iwanaga R,
    6. Hashimoto T,
    7. Taguchi T
    : Functional neuro-vascularized muscle transfer for oncological reconstruction of extremity sarcoma. Surg Oncol 21: 263-268, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Innocenti M,
    2. Abed YY,
    3. Beltrami G,
    4. Delcroix L,
    5. Balatri A,
    6. Capanna R
    : Quadriceps muscle reconstruction with free functioning latissimus dorsi muscle flap after oncological resection. Microsurgery 29: 189-198, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Ikuta Y,
    2. Kubo T,
    3. Tsuge K
    : Free muscle transplantation by microsurgical technique to treat severe Volkmann's contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 58: 407-411,1976.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Manktelow RT,
    2. McKee NH
    : Free muscle transplantation to provide active finger flexion. J Hand Surg Am 3: 416-426,1978.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Doi K,
    2. Muramatsu K,
    3. Hattori Y,
    4. Otsuka K,
    5. Tan SH,
    6. Nanda V
    : Restoration of prehension with the double free muscle technique following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus. Indications and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82: 652-666, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Doi K,
    2. Kuwata N,
    3. Kawakami F,
    4. Hattori Y,
    5. Otsuka K,
    6. Ihara K
    : Limb-sparing surgery with reinnervated free-muscle transfer following radical excision of soft-tissue sarcoma in the extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 1679-1687, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Ihara K,
    2. Shigetomi M,
    3. Kawai S,
    4. Doi K,
    5. Yamamoto M
    : Functioning muscle transplantation after wide excision of sarcomas in the extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 358: 140-148, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Pritsch T,
    2. Malawer MM,
    3. Wu CC,
    4. Squires MH,
    5. Bickels J
    : Functional reconstruction of the extensor mechanism following massive tumor resections from the anterior compartment of the thigh. Plast Reconstr Surg 120: 960-969, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Doi K,
    2. Tamaru K,
    3. Sakai K,
    4. Kuwata N,
    5. Kurafuji Y,
    6. Kawai S
    : A comparison of vascularized and conventional sural nerve grafts. J Hand Surg Am 17: 670-676, 1992.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Koshima I,
    2. Nanba Y,
    3. Tsutsui T,
    4. Takahashi Y,
    5. Kawai A
    : Vascularized femoral nerve graft with anterolateral thigh true perforator flap for massive defects after cancer ablation in the upper arm. J Reconstr Microsurg 19: 299-302, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. el-Barrany WG,
    2. Marei AG,
    3. Vallée B
    : Anatomic basis of vascularised nerve grafts: The blood supply of peripheral nerves. Surg Radiol Anat 21: 95-102, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Breidenbach WC,
    2. Terzis JK
    : Vascularized nerve grafts: An experimental and clinical review. Ann Plast Surg 18: 137-146, 1987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Muramatsu K,
    2. Ihara K,
    3. Doi K,
    4. Shigetomi M,
    5. Hashimoto T,
    6. Taguchi T
    : Reconstruction of massive femur defect with free vascularized fibula graft following tumor resection. Anticancer Res 26: 3679-3683, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Weiland AJ,
    2. Kleinert HE,
    3. Kutz JE,
    4. Daniel RK
    : Free vascularized bone grafts in surgery of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 4: 129-144, 1979.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Pho RW
    : Malignant giant-cell tumor of the distal end of the radius treated by a free vascularized fibular transplant. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63: 877-884, 1981.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bickert B,
    2. Heitmann Ch,
    3. Germann G
    : Fibulo-scapho-lunate arthrodesis as a motion-preserving procedure after tumour resection of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Br 27: 573-576, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Vander Griend RA,
    2. Funderburk CH
    : The treatment of giant-cell tumors of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75: 899-908, 1993.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Usui M,
    2. Murakami T,
    3. Naito T,
    4. Wada T,
    5. Takahashi T,
    6. Ishii S
    : Some problems in wrist reconstruction after tumor resection with vascularized fibular-head graft. J Reconstr Microsurg 12: 81-88, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Minami A,
    2. Kato H,
    3. Iwasaki N
    : Vascularized fibular graft after excision of giant-cell tumor of the distal radius: Wrist arthroplasty versus partial wrist arthrodesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 110: 112-117, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ono H,
    2. Yajima H,
    3. Mizumoto S,
    4. Miyauchi Y,
    5. Mii Y,
    6. Tamai S
    : Vascularized fibular graft for reconstruction of the wrist after excision of giant cell tumor. Plast Reconstr Surg 99: 1086-1093, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Ihara K,
    2. Doi K,
    3. Sakai K,
    4. Yamamoto M,
    5. Kanchiku T,
    6. Kawai S
    : Vascularized fibular graft after excision of giant cell tumor of the distal radius. A case report. Clin Orthop 359: 189-196, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Muramatsu K,
    2. Ihara K,
    3. Azuma E,
    4. Orui R,
    5. Goto Y,
    6. Shigetomi M,
    7. Doi K
    : Free vascularized fibula grafting for reconstruction of the wrist following wide tumor excision. Microsurgery 25: 101-106, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Brumfield RH,
    2. Champoux JA
    : A biomechanical study of normal functional wrist motion. Clin Orthop 187: 23-25, 1984.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Littler JW
    : Architectural principles of reconstructive hand surgery. Surg Clin North Am 31: 463-476,1950.
  49. ↵
    1. Posner MA
    : Ray transposition for central digital loss. J Hand Surg Am 4: 242-257, 1979.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Buck-Gramcko D
    : Thumb reconstruction by digital transposition. Orthop Clin North Am 8: 329-342, 1977.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Ishida O,
    2. Taniguchi Y,
    3. Sunagawa T,
    4. Suzuki O,
    5. Ochi M
    : Pollicization of the index finger for traumatic thumb amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117: 909-914, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Awada T,
    2. Facca S,
    3. Liverneaux PA
    : Successful thumb reconstruction after tumor resection by immediate toe transfer in a 67-year-old patient: Case report and literature review. Chir Main 31: 97-100, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Toh S,
    2. Narita S,
    3. Arai K,
    4. Nakashima K,
    5. Tsubo K
    : Distraction lengthening by callotasis in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84: 205-210, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 33, Issue 10
October 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Musculoskeletal Sarcomas in the Forearm and Hand: Standard Treatment and Microsurgical Reconstruction for Limb Salvage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Musculoskeletal Sarcomas in the Forearm and Hand: Standard Treatment and Microsurgical Reconstruction for Limb Salvage
KEIICHI MURAMATSU, KOICHIRO IHARA, KOJI YOSHIDA, YASUHIRO TOMINAGA, TAKAHIRO HASHIMOTO, TOSHIHIKO TAGUCHI
Anticancer Research Oct 2013, 33 (10) 4175-4182;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Musculoskeletal Sarcomas in the Forearm and Hand: Standard Treatment and Microsurgical Reconstruction for Limb Salvage
KEIICHI MURAMATSU, KOICHIRO IHARA, KOJI YOSHIDA, YASUHIRO TOMINAGA, TAKAHIRO HASHIMOTO, TOSHIHIKO TAGUCHI
Anticancer Research Oct 2013, 33 (10) 4175-4182;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Anatomical Consideration of the Distal Upper Extremities
    • Histological Subtypes of Sarcoma of the Distal Upper Extremities
    • Oncological Outcomes for Sarcomas in the Distal Upper Extremities
    • Indications for Chemotherapy
    • Adequate Surgical Margins
    • Microsurgical Reconstruction for Massive Soft Tissue and Osteochondral Defects (Table III)
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Radiotherapy Does Not Impact Long-term Function Following Resection of Soft-tissue Sarcomas of the Hand
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cytokine-based Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities for IL-10
  • Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy in Complementary Oncology: A Systematic Review
  • Multimodal Treatment of Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Show more Reviews

Keywords

  • Musculoskeletal tumor
  • forearm
  • hand
  • limb salvage
  • microsurgery
  • tissue transfer
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire