Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A 22-Year Experience

SOFIA M. STASINOU, GEORGE VALASOULIS, MARIA KYRGIOU, VASILIKI MALAMOU-MITSI, EVRIPIDIS BILIRAKIS, LINA PAPPA, EMMANOUIL DELIGEOROGLOU, MARIA NASIOUTZIKI, CHRISTINA FOUNTA, ALEXANDROS DAPONTE, GEORGE KOLIOPOULOS, ARISTOTELIS LOUFOPOULOS, PETROS KARAKITSOS and EVANGELOS PARASKEVAIDIS
Anticancer Research September 2012, 32 (9) 4141-4145;
SOFIA M. STASINOU
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.stasinou{at}yahoo.com
GEORGE VALASOULIS
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA KYRGIOU
2West London Gynaecological Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital, London, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VASILIKI MALAMOU-MITSI
3Department of Cytopathology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EVRIPIDIS BILIRAKIS
4Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Polikliniki General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LINA PAPPA
3Department of Cytopathology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EMMANOUIL DELIGEOROGLOU
5Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Athens, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA NASIOUTZIKI
6Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTINA FOUNTA
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALEXANDROS DAPONTE
7Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Larisa, Larisa, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORGE KOLIOPOULOS
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ARISTOTELIS LOUFOPOULOS
6Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PETROS KARAKITSOS
8Department of Cytopathology, Attikon Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EVANGELOS PARASKEVAIDIS
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To review the 22-year experience of the use of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Materials and Methods: Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: University Hospital of Ioannina, Greece. Period: January 1989 until December 2011. Population: Women undergoing excisional treatment with LLETZ for CIN. Women with invasive disease were excluded. Intervention: Excisional treatment with LLETZ. Women had post-operative surveillance with cytology and colposcopy at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, and yearly thereafter. Outcomes: We assessed the histological outcomes and margin involvement, as well as the rate of treatment failures requiring a repeat conization. Results: A total of 3861 LLETZ biopsies were recorded during the study period. The histological evaluation of the cone specimens showed CIN1 in 897 (23.2%), CIN2 in 1129 (29.3%), CIN3 in 1322 (34.2%), microinvasive disease in 158 (4.1%), HPV lesions in 206 (5.3%) and normal histological findings in 149 (3.9%) women. The margins were reported as clear in 3166 (82%) cases, involved in 437 (11.3%) cases and uncertain in 258 (6.7%) cases. A total of 239 (6.2%) women underwent a second conization due to treatment failure. Conclusion: LLETZ remains the most popular conservative technique of treatment for women with precancerous cervical lesions. Post-treatment surveillance of these women is essential in order to detect residual or recurrent disease. New HPV biomarkers, introduced over the last two years, appear to be useful in the follow-up after treatment. A scoring system may allow for accurate prediction of women at risk of treatment failure and for tailored post-treatment surveillance.

  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
  • electrosurgical excision
  • large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)
  • loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)
  • human papillomavirus (HPV)
  • HPV DNA
  • HPV-related biomarkers

Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) is the most frequently used method of treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) worldwide (1, 2). This is attributed mainly to the fact that LLETZ is simple to learn and use, relatively cheap, of short duration and can be performed under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting; all these characteristics make it an appealing alternative to cold knife conization (CKC). Furthermore, being an excisional technique, it provides a cone-shaped specimen that allows for comprehensive histopathological evaluation of the lesion's grade and an assessment of the excisional margins (3, 4). The aforementioned parameters are of paramount importance for the post-treatment management of those women who undergo treatment, determining the duration and intensity of the follow-up (5-7).

In addition, LLETZ has similar efficacy to other available therapeutic modalities and is associated with only minor intra- or short-term post-operative complications (1, 2, 8-12). It has only recently been found that LLETZ is associated with long-term adverse obstetric outcomes and an increased risk of preterm birth. However, the obstetric risks associated with LLETZ are not as significant as those associated with other available excisional techniques, namely CKC or laser conization (13-16).

The purpose of this study is to present the 22-year experience of an academic colposcopic clinic on the use and outcomes of LLETZ for the treatment of precancerous or early invasive cervical disease, and to highlight the results of primary and secondary research driven from this experience in this particular setting (17).

Patients and Methods

The study was a retrospective case series with data collected from the colposcopy clinic of the University Hospital of Ioannina in Greece from 1989 until 2011.

Only women referred for colposcopy with abnormal cytology or positive HPV DNA test were included. As there is no national organized cervical screening program, the majority of women were either self-referred or referred by a private gynecologist and/or cytopathologist (18).

Protocol and principles of management. After colposcopic examination, a signed colpophotograph with the colposcopic impression and relevant plan of management was given to the patient.

Women with high-grade cytology and consistent colposcopy were advised to undergo treatment immediately after the end of their next menstruation. The appropriate timing for LLETZ was assessed in a departmental audit, which demonstrated that women treated during the first half of their cycle bleed less, both intraoperatively and in the post-treatment period. This observation was also subsequently confirmed in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (12). The same treatment policy was applied for older women and women who had completed their family and who had low-grade cytology and low-grade colposcopy and opted for a definitive therapeutic intervention rather than conservative surveillance.

Conservative management with repeated cytology and colposcopy in six months was the preferred method of management for young nulliparous women or for women who had not completed their family and had a low-grade cytology with consistent colposcopic findings (19, 20).

The management of young nulliparous women with high-grade cytology and low-grade colposcopy and viceversa was more challenging. In the majority of cases an expectant policy was adopted in cytology colposcopy mismatch cases, in close collaboration with the cytopathologists after review of the original smear.

The LLETZ procedure was also performed if there was suspicion of invasion, glandular lesion, persistent discrepancy between high-grade cytology and low-grade colposcopy, as well as in cases of treatment failure (21).

Pregnant women with cytological or colposcopic evidence of CIN underwent colposcopic examination every 2-3 months to exclude progression of the lesions and the final decision for further management, including treatment, was made eight weeks postpartum (22).

LLETZ technique. LLETZ was performed under colposcopic guidance using a local anesthetic. The cervical crater was cauterized to prevent immediate postoperative bleeding by the formation of a cauterized plaque on whole its surface and on the ectocervical lips with care to avoid an area of 3-4 mm around the new cervical os at the bottom of the crater. This technique was found to increase the possibility of satisfactory post-LLETZ colposcopy as shown in a RCT (8). The depth of the excision was decided after the clinical judgment of the lesion by expert colposcopists, based on the features of the lesion and the estimated cervical length. As a rule, the depth of the LLETZ was more than 7 mm to ensure eradication of cervical intraepithelial lesions that may involve the gland crypt, but less than 1 cm of depth if the patient was young, nulliparous or had not completed her family (23).

Follow-up after LLETZ. All patients were scheduled for follow-up examination after treatment at 6-12-18 and 24-month intervals with repeated cytology and colposcopy examination. During the past decade (2001-2010), we have also used HPV DNA test as an adjunct follow-up test (24, 25). Repeated LLETZ was performed in cases when there was both cytological and colposcopic evidence of residual high-grade disease or high-grade cytology in the presence of unsatisfactory colposcopy, as well as in cases of older women with positive endocervical margins for high-grade lesions (4, 7, 11). Women who had microinvasive disease on the LLETZ specimen were managed on an individualized basis, taking into consideration their age, parity and status of cone margins, as well as post-treatment HPV detection (21, 26, 27).

Results

We assessed 3861 women who underwent a LLETZ procedure over a period of 22 years in the colposcopy clinic of the University Hospital of Ioannina. The patients' mean age was 36.24 years. Histological evaluation of the excised specimens showed 897 (23.2%) women with CIN1, 1129 (29.3%) with CIN2, 1322 (34.2%) with CIN3, 94 (2.4%) with microinvasive and 64 (1.72%) invasive disease, 206 (5.3%) with HPV lesions and 149 (3.9%) women who had normal histology.

From the sample of 3861 women with histological evaluation, 3166 (82%) women had clear endocervical margins, 437 (11.3%) of the cases had involved margins and uncertain margins due to diathermy artifacts were found in 258 (6.7%) cases. Treatment failure was diagnosed in 239 (6.2%) women who underwent a second conization. Out of the 239 repeat cone specimens, 131 (54.8%) revealed CIN1, 79 (33.05%) CIN2, 26 (10.9%) CIN3 and 3 specimens (1.25%) revealed microinvasive disease. Involved margins were confirmed in 12 (5%) cases, while in 227 (95%) cases the margins were clear after the repeat cone.

The majority (90%) of treatment failures were detected within 24 months of treatment. Women with involved margins were at higher risk of treatment failure compared to those with clear margins (18% versus 3%).

Discussion

The ability to identify pre-cancerous cervical lesions which require treatment in order to prevent their progression to cervical cancer, constitutes a significant challenge, especially for women who are nulliparous or wish to maintain their future fertility. In terms of residual disease after treatment for CIN and postoperative morbidity, evidence from the recent literature suggests that there is no superior surgical technique for treating such lesions (2, 10). Within that frame, a policy of see, think, select and treat is preferable in terms of effective management, limitation of complications and preservation of fertility in younger women (13-15, 28).

Cytology remains the mainstay in primary screening, while the HPV-DNA test also appears to have an important role in screening not only with improved sensitivity but also in the triage of women with atypical squamous cells with undetermined significance (ASCUS) and in post-treatment surveillance (19, 20, 24, 25, 29-32). However, HPV-related biomarkers such as high-risk (HR)-HPV DNA test, mRNA E6 and E7, or p16(INK4a) can be used as an adjunct test in the triage of women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LgSIL), as p16(INK4a) improves the specificity of HR-HPV DNA test in terms of identifing women at risk of developing high-grade lesions (CIN2+) (33-36).

There is evidence that the proportion of the cervical volume excised affects cervical regeneration. Thus, the larger the volume excised when treating CIN, the larger the deficit in cervical healing post-operatively. Subsequently, the assessment of the proportion of the cervical volume excised, after treatment of CIN, might determine the group of women who are at higher risk for preterm labour in future pregnancies (13, 14, 16, 23, 28, 37-44).

Although the excisional techniques with local anesthesia seem to provide an appropriate specimen for histological diagnosis of CIN, recent evidence has shown that the most effective way to prevent cervical cancer might be the combination of vaccination and screening, especially in younger women (45-48). Existing evidence supports that vaccination against HPV types 16 and 18 (responsible for up to 72% of cervical carcinomas) and screening with liquid-based cytology (LBC), or HPV DNA testing are complementary strategies in the pre- and postoperative management of women with CIN.

In an attempt to predict and prevent treatment failures, our group worked towards the development of a test of cure. Preliminary data has shown that after treatment of CIN, there is a significant reduction of positivity in all HPV-related biomarkers, while condom use in the post-treatment period reduces HR-HPV positivity rates (49). The different combinations of HPV-related biomarkers, various risk factors and individual characteristics, possibly in the form of a scoring system could allow for tailored surveillance after treatment of CIN and the possibility to predict treatment failure and allow the return to routine follow-up of women at low risk of recurrent disease (45, 49-51).

  • Received June 5, 2012.
  • Revision received August 14, 2012.
  • Accepted August 15, 2012.
  • Copyright© 2012 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Martin-Hirsch PL,
    2. Paraskevaidis E,
    3. Kitchener H
    : Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD001318, 2000.
  2. ↵
    1. Martin-Hirsch PP,
    2. Paraskevaidis E,
    3. Bryant A,
    4. Dickinson HO,
    5. Keep SL
    : Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD001318, 2010.
  3. ↵
    1. Prendiville W
    : Large loop excision of the transformation zone. Clin Obstet Gynecol 38: 622-639, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Kitchener H,
    3. Adonakis G,
    4. Parkin D,
    5. Lolis D
    : Incomplete excision of CIN in conization: further excision or conservative management? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 53: 45-47, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Soutter WP,
    2. de Barros Lopes A,
    3. Fletcher A,
    4. Monaghan JM,
    5. Duncan ID,
    6. Paraskevaidis E,
    7. Kitchener HC
    : Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 349: 978-980, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Lolis ED,
    3. Koliopoulos G,
    4. Alamanos Y,
    5. Fotiou S,
    6. Kitchener HC
    : Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after large loop excision with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol 95: 828-831, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Kalantaridou SN,
    3. Paschopoulos M,
    4. Zikopoulos K,
    5. Diakomanolis E,
    6. Dalkalitsis N,
    7. Makrydimas G,
    8. Pappa L,
    9. Malamou-Mitsi V,
    10. Agnantis NJ
    : Factors affecting outcome after incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 24: 541-543, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Koliopoulos G,
    3. Paschopoulos M,
    4. Stefanidis K,
    5. Navrozoglou I,
    6. Lolis D
    : Effects of ball cauterization following loop excision and follow-up colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 97: 617-620, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Nuovo J,
    2. Melnikow J,
    3. Willan AR,
    4. Chan BK
    : Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 68: 25-33, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kyrgiou M,
    2. Tsoumpou I,
    3. Vrekoussis T,
    4. Martin-Hirsch P,
    5. Arbyn M,
    6. Prendiville W,
    7. Mitrou S,
    8. Koliopoulos G,
    9. Dalkalitsis N,
    10. Stamatopoulos P,
    11. Paraskevaidis E
    : The up-to-date evidence on colposcopy practice and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the Cochrane Colposcopy and Cervical Cytopathology Collaborative Group (C5 group) approach. Cancer Treat Rev 32: 516-523, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Kitchener HC,
    3. Malamou-Mitsi V,
    4. Agnanti N,
    5. Lolis D
    : Thermal tissue damage following laser and large loop conization of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 84: 752-754, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Davidson EJ,
    3. Koliopoulos G,
    4. Alamanos Y,
    5. Lolis E,
    6. Martin-Hirsch P
    : Bleeding after loop electrosurgical excision procedure performed in either the follicular or luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 99: 997-1000, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kyrgiou M,
    2. Koliopoulos G,
    3. Martin-Hirsch P,
    4. Arbyn M,
    5. Prendiville W,
    6. Paraskevaidis E
    : Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367: 489-498, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Arbyn M,
    2. Kyrgiou M,
    3. Simoens C,
    4. Raifu AO,
    5. Koliopoulos G,
    6. Martin-Hirsch P,
    7. Prendiville W,
    8. Paraskevaidis E
    : Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Meta-analysis. BMJ 337: a1284, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Kyrgiou M,
    3. Martin-Hirsch P
    : Have we dismissed ablative treatment too soon in colposcopy practice? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 114: 3-4, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Bilirakis E,
    3. Koliopoulos G,
    4. Lolis ED,
    5. Kalantaridou S,
    6. Paschopoulos M,
    7. Plachouras N,
    8. Malamou-Mitsi V,
    9. Kitchener HC
    : Cervical regeneration after diathermy excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as assessed by transvaginal sonography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 102: 88-91, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Koliopoulos G,
    3. Malamou-Mitsi V,
    4. Zikopoulos K,
    5. Paschopoulos M,
    6. Pappa L,
    7. Agnantis NJ,
    8. Loli DE
    : Large loop excision of the transformation zone for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A 12-year experience. Anticancer Res 21: 3097-3099, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Arbyn M,
    2. Primic-Zakelj M,
    3. Raifu AO,
    4. Grce M,
    5. Paraskevaidis E,
    6. Diakomanolis E,
    7. Kesic V,
    8. Nicula FA,
    9. Suteu O,
    10. von Karsa L
    : The burden of cervical cancer in south-east Europe at the beginning of the 21st century. Coll Anthropol 31(Suppl 2): 7-10, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Kyrgiou M,
    2. Koliopoulos G,
    3. Martin-Hirsch P,
    4. Kehoe S,
    5. Flannelly G,
    6. Mitrou S,
    7. Arbyn M,
    8. Prendiville W,
    9. Paraskevaidis E
    : Management of minor cervical cytological abnormalities: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev 33: 514-520, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Arbyn M,
    2. Dillner J,
    3. Van Ranst M,
    4. Buntinx F,
    5. Martin-Hirsch P,
    6. Paraskevaidis E
    : Re: Have we resolved how to triage equivocal cervical cytology? J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 1401-1402; author reply 1402, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Kalantaridou SN,
    3. Kaponis A,
    4. Chouliara S,
    5. Agnantis NJ,
    6. Dousias V,
    7. Zikopoulos K,
    8. Paschopoulos M,
    9. Stamatopoulos P,
    10. Lolis DE
    : Surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: Ten years experience from one Greek health region. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23: 341-344, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Koliopoulos G,
    3. Kalantaridou S,
    4. Pappa L,
    5. Navrozoglou I,
    6. Zikopoulos K,
    7. Lolis DE
    : Management and evolution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy and postpartum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 104: 67-69, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Ang C,
    2. Mukhopadhyay A,
    3. Burnley C,
    4. Faulkner K,
    5. Cross P,
    6. Martin-Hirsch P,
    7. Naik R
    : Histological recurrence and depth of loop treatment of the cervix in women of reproductive age: Incomplete excision versus adverse pregnancy outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 118: 685-692, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Arbyn M,
    3. Sotiriadis A,
    4. Diakomanolis E,
    5. Martin-Hirsch P,
    6. Koliopoulos G,
    7. Makrydimas G,
    8. Tofoski J,
    9. Roukos DH
    : The role of HPV DNA testing in the follow-up period after treatment for CIN: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev 30: 205-211, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Arbyn M,
    2. Paraskevaidis E,
    3. Martin-Hirsch P,
    4. Prendiville W,
    5. Dillner J
    : Clinical utility of HPV-DNA detection: triage of minor cervical lesions, follow-up of women treated for high-grade CIN: an update of pooled evidence. Gynecol Oncol 99: S7-11, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Koliopoulos G,
    2. Sotiriadis A,
    3. Kyrgiou M,
    4. Martin-Hirsch P,
    5. Makrydimas G,
    6. Paraskevaidis E
    : Conservative surgical methods for FIGO stage IA2 squamous cervical carcinoma and their role in preserving women's fertility. Gynecol Oncol 93: 469-473, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Paraskevaidis E,
    2. Koliopoulos G,
    3. Lolis E,
    4. Papanikou E,
    5. Malamou-Mitsi V,
    6. Agnantis NJ
    : Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 86: 10-13, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Khalid S,
    2. Dimitriou E,
    3. Conroy R,
    4. Paraskevaidis E,
    5. Kyrgiou M,
    6. Harrity C,
    7. Arbyn M,
    8. Prendiville W
    : The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 119: 685-691, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Koliopoulos G,
    2. Arbyn M,
    3. Martin-Hirsch P,
    4. Kyrgiou M,
    5. Prendiville W,
    6. Paraskevaidis E
    : Diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Gynecol Oncol 104: 232-246, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gok M,
    2. Coupe VM,
    3. Berkhof J,
    4. Verheijen RH,
    5. Helmerhorst TJ,
    6. Hogewoning CJ,
    7. Snijders PJ,
    8. Meijer CJ
    : HPV16 and increased risk of recurrence after treatment for CIN. Gynecol Oncol 104: 273-275, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Coupe VM,
    2. Berkhof J,
    3. Verheijen RH,
    4. Meijer CJ
    : Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 114: 416-424, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Arbyn M,
    2. Buntinx F,
    3. Van Ranst M,
    4. Paraskevaidis E,
    5. Martin-Hirsch P,
    6. Dillner J
    : Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: A meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 280-293, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Nasioutziki M,
    2. Daniilidis A,
    3. Dinas K,
    4. Kyrgiou M,
    5. Valasoulis G,
    6. Loufopoulos PD,
    7. Paraskevaidis E,
    8. Loufopoulos A,
    9. Karakitsos P
    : The evaluation of p16 (INK4a) immunoexpression/immuno-staining and human papillomavirus DNA test in cervical liquid-based cytological samples. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21: 79-85, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tsoumpou I,
    2. Valasoulis G,
    3. Founta C,
    4. Kyrgiou M,
    5. Nasioutziki M,
    6. Daponte A,
    7. Koliopoulos G,
    8. Malamou-Mitsi V,
    9. Karakitsos P,
    10. Paraskevaidis E
    : High-risk human papillomavirus DNA test and p16(INK4a) in the triage of LSIL: a prospective diagnostic study. Gynecol Oncol 121: 49-53, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Koliopoulos G,
    2. Valasoulis G,
    3. Zilakou E
    : An update review on HPV testing methods for cervical neoplasia. Expert Opin Med Diagn 3: 123-131, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Valasoulis G,
    2. Tsoumpou I,
    3. Founta C,
    4. Kyrgiou M,
    5. Dalkalitsis N,
    6. Nasioutziki M,
    7. Kassanos D,
    8. Paraskevaidis E,
    9. Karakitsos P
    : The role of p16(INK4a) immunostaining in the risk assessment of women with LSIL cytology: A prospective pragmatic study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 32: 150-152, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Phadnis SV,
    2. Atilade A,
    3. Bowring J,
    4. Kyrgiou M,
    5. Young MPA,
    6. Evans H,
    7. Paraskevaidis E,
    8. Walker P
    : Regeneration of cervix after excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A study of collagen distribution. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 118: 1585-1591, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Noehr B,
    2. Jensen A,
    3. Frederiksen K,
    4. Tabor A,
    5. Kjaer SK
    : Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201: 33 e31-36, 2009.
    OpenUrl
    1. Founta C,
    2. Arbyn M,
    3. Valasoulis G,
    4. Kyrgiou M,
    5. Tsili A,
    6. Martin-Hirsch P,
    7. Dalkalitsis N,
    8. Karakitsos P,
    9. Kassanos D,
    10. Prendiville W,
    11. Loufopoulos A,
    12. Paraskevaidis E
    : Proportion of excision and cervical healing after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 117: 1468-1474, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Noehr B,
    2. Jensen A,
    3. Frederiksen K,
    4. Tabor A,
    5. Kjaer SK
    : Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114: 1232-1238, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ortoft G,
    2. Henriksen T,
    3. Hansen E,
    4. Petersen L
    : After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 117: 258-267, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Jakobsson M,
    2. Gissler M,
    3. Paavonen J,
    4. Tapper AM
    : Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet and Gynecol 114: 504-510, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Prendiville W
    : The treatment of CIN: What are the risks? Cytopathology 20: 145-153, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Phadnis SV,
    2. Atilade A,
    3. Young MP,
    4. Evans H,
    5. Walker PG
    : The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ). Br J Obstet Gynaecol 117: 615-619.
  33. ↵
    1. Kyrgiou M,
    2. Valasoulis G,
    3. Founta C,
    4. Koliopoulos G,
    5. Karakitsos P,
    6. Nasioutziki M,
    7. Navrozoglou I,
    8. Dalkalitsis N,
    9. Paraskevaidis E
    : Clinical management of HPV-related disease of the lower genital tract. Ann NY Acad Sci 1205: 57-68, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kyrgiou M,
    2. Shafi MI
    : HPV vaccine. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 19: 26-28, 2009.
    OpenUrl
    1. Tsakiroglou M,
    2. Bakalis M,
    3. Valasoulis G,
    4. Paschopoulos M,
    5. Koliopoulos G,
    6. Paraskevaidis E
    : Women's knowledge and utilization of gynecological cancer prevention services in the Northwest of Greece. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 32: 178-181, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Kitchener HC,
    2. Paraskevaidis E
    : Patient's preference: A sound basis for policy? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 119: 5-6, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Valasoulis G,
    2. Koliopoulos G,
    3. Founta C,
    4. Kyrgiou M,
    5. Tsoumpou I,
    6. Valari O,
    7. Martin-Hirsch P,
    8. Daponte A,
    9. Karakitsos P,
    10. Paraskevaidis E
    : Alterations in human papillomavirus-related biomarkers after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 121: 43-48, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Karakitsos P,
    2. Pouliakis A,
    3. Meristoudis C,
    4. Margari N,
    5. Kassanos D,
    6. Kyrgiou M,
    7. Panayiotides JG,
    8. Paraskevaidis E
    : A preliminary study of the potential of tree classifiers in triage of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 33: 132-140, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Karakitsos P,
    2. Chrelias C,
    3. Pouliakis A,
    4. Koliopoulos G,
    5. Spathis A,
    6. Kyrgiou M,
    7. Meristoudis C,
    8. Chranioti A,
    9. Kottaridi C,
    10. Valasoulis G,
    11. Panayiotides I,
    12. Paraskevaidis E
    : Identification of Women for Referral to Colposcopy by Neural Networks: A Preliminary Study Based on Liquid Based Cytology and Molecular Biomarkers. J Biomed Biotechnol (in Press) 2012.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 32, Issue 9
September 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A 22-Year Experience
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A 22-Year Experience
SOFIA M. STASINOU, GEORGE VALASOULIS, MARIA KYRGIOU, VASILIKI MALAMOU-MITSI, EVRIPIDIS BILIRAKIS, LINA PAPPA, EMMANOUIL DELIGEOROGLOU, MARIA NASIOUTZIKI, CHRISTINA FOUNTA, ALEXANDROS DAPONTE, GEORGE KOLIOPOULOS, ARISTOTELIS LOUFOPOULOS, PETROS KARAKITSOS, EVANGELOS PARASKEVAIDIS
Anticancer Research Sep 2012, 32 (9) 4141-4145;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A 22-Year Experience
SOFIA M. STASINOU, GEORGE VALASOULIS, MARIA KYRGIOU, VASILIKI MALAMOU-MITSI, EVRIPIDIS BILIRAKIS, LINA PAPPA, EMMANOUIL DELIGEOROGLOU, MARIA NASIOUTZIKI, CHRISTINA FOUNTA, ALEXANDROS DAPONTE, GEORGE KOLIOPOULOS, ARISTOTELIS LOUFOPOULOS, PETROS KARAKITSOS, EVANGELOS PARASKEVAIDIS
Anticancer Research Sep 2012, 32 (9) 4141-4145;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Cervical Pathology Following HPV Vaccination in Greece: A 10-year HeCPA Observational Cohort Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Preoperative Cachexia Index Predicts Overall Survival Following Curative Resection for Remnant Gastric Cancer
  • Effect of Increased Image Matrix on Lung Nodule Volumetry in Chest CT: A Phantom Study
  • Prognostic Impact of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire