Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleExperimental StudiesR

MicroRNAs in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy

BADER MOHAMAD AL-ALI, ANNA LENA RESS, ARMIN GERGER and MARTIN PICHLER
Anticancer Research September 2012, 32 (9) 3727-3732;
BADER MOHAMAD AL-ALI
1Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNA LENA RESS
2Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ARMIN GERGER
2Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARTIN PICHLER
2Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: martin.pichler{at}medunigraz.at
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a potentially curable disease, especially if the tumor is limited to the kidneys and no systemic metastatic spread has occurred by the time of diagnosis. Despite the potential for successful surgical removal of the tumor-bearing organ in localized stages and the likelihood of treatment success, the complications and long-term morbidity and mortality of RCC are difficult to accurately predict. The currently used drugs were developed based on the understanding of the molecular details of pathogenesis at the time, which has improved over the past several decades. However, more efforts should be made to improve early diagnosis, the surveillance of patients who undergo resection and treatment for metastatic RCC. Recently, small non-coding RNAs (microRNAs) were found to play pivotal roles in the metastatic dissemination of tumor cells in different types of cancer. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the role of microRNAs in the pathogenesis of RCC and to discuss their potential as diagnostic, prognostic and, ultimately, therapeutic biomolecules.

  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • microRNAs
  • pathophysiology
  • diagnosis
  • prognosis
  • review

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 3% of all adult malignancies, and its incidence has increased over the past two decades (1). Although the reasons for the observed epidemiological changes remain enigmatic, there is a significant trend towards smaller tumor size, a phenomenon called stage migration (2). The treatment of choice for localized, kidney-confined tumors is surgery. The risk of tumor dissemination and disease recurrence differs depending on the tumor stage and other clinical and pathological prognostic factors (3-5). Several antitumor agents are currently available for the treatment of metastatic RCC, primarily targeting the angiogenesis and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways (6). All of these agents have been proven to improve clinical endpoints, such as progression-free or overall survival, but their efficacy is limited, and the duration of response is often short. Therefore, there is a clear need for novel molecular biomarkers that enable the early diagnosis of RCC, for better risk assessment, to select patients for more aggressive treatment modalities, and for molecules that serve as novel drug targets.

MicroRNAs

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in many physiological and pathological cellular processes (7). They are short RNAs of approximately 22 nucleotides (hence the micro-terminology) that are never translated into a protein and are therefore categorized as non-coding RNAs. miRNAs are post-transcriptional regulators that control the translation of large messenger RNAs (mRNAs). After a complex biogenesis process, in which the miRNAs are first generated as primary (pri-)miRNAs, then transferred from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by the exportin 5 pore protein, they are cleaved into a pre-miRNA and finally associate with complex protein machinery in the cytoplasm (8). There, the miRNAs bind to complementary sequences in the 3’-untranslated region (UTR) or other regions of their target mRNAs, usually resulting in gene silencing through the induction of mRNA degradation or the inhibition of protein translation. miRNAs are thought to be involved in many biological processes, and some miRNAs have been linked to kidney cancer (8). The aim of this review is to discuss the involvement of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of kidney cancer, describing their potential as novel diagnostic and prognostic markers, and to outline how these small molecules might eventually serve as therapeutic targets.

MicroRNAs and the Pathophysiology of RCC

Hypoxia and other mechanisms. The up- and down-regulation of various miRNAs in RCC were described in several recently published studies. The cellular effects of miRNA dysregulation are diverse and often lead to typical features of cancer, which are described in more detail in the following sections (for an overview see also Figure 1). Because the same miRNA can target multiple mRNAs and multiple miRNAs can control the same molecule, it is often difficult to precisely analyze the effects of a particular miRNA (9). For instance, miR-17-5p and miR-224 both target hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) and Von Hippel-Landau protein (VHL), whose expression is lost in approximately 70% of all RCCs (10). In addition to VHL and HIF1α, miR-17-5p expression is also negatively-correlated with the expression of its two predicted targets, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and egl nine homolog 3 (EGLN3). The expression of miR-224 is negatively-correlated with that of its targets, Sma- and Mad-related protein 4 (SMAD4) and SMAD5. These findings underline the fact that in RCC specimens, dysregulated miRNAs were found to modulate the function of VHL-HIF-1α by targeting downstream signaling pathways (10). Hypoxic conditions are often observed in rapidly growing tumors, including RCC. The VHL and HIF1α genes play an important role in hypoxia and pathogenesis of RCC, and some related oncogenic miRNAs were found to interfere with the VHL HIF1α signaling cascade. For instance, miR-92 and VHL mRNA expression were prominently inversely correlated (11). In clear cell RCC, miR-138 targets HIF1α and suppresses its expression, which, in turn, can affect apoptosis and migration of RCC cancer cells (12). In addition, HIF1α accumulation is associated with miR-210 up-regulation, and miR-210 overexpression induces centrosome amplification and aneuploidy via the down-regulation of E2F transcription factor 3 (E2F3). This mechanism may contribute to tumorigenesis and tumor progression (13). In another study, carbamylated albumin, a metabolite with unknown biological functions, was found to be potentially involved in the pathogenesis of RCC by stimulating miR-146a/b expression. Although miR-146a/b are often up-regulated in RCC and the oncogenic effects of miR-146a/b were reported in breast cancer, their specific role in RCC has not yet been studied (14).

Cell proliferation. One of the hallmarks of cancer is uncontrolled cell growth, and miRNAs have been described to alter cell proliferation in RCC. For instance, the tumor suppressor miR-1285, which is down-regulated in RCC, normally targets the oncogene transglutaminase 2 (TGM2), which affects proliferation and wound healing (15). miR-199a is frequently down-regulated in RCC (in 59% of RCC cases), and the restoration of miR-199a expression down-regulates glycogen synthase kinase 3b (GSK3b). GSK3b was described as a growth promoter in RCC, and targeting GSK3b through the restoration of miR-199a expression inhibits RCC cell growth (16). Another miRNA involved in cell proliferation is miR-205, which is significantly down-regulated in many RCC cases. The overexpression of miR-205 inhibits cell proliferation by targeting the oncogenic phospho-sarcoma (Src) tyrosine kinase-regulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) pathway (17). The inhibition of miR-21, an miRNA that was widely identified as being oncogenic for many types of cancer, has a significant antiproliferative effect in RCC cell lines (18). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) is targeted by several miRNAs, and VEGFA is targeted by miR-126. Both factors are positive regulators of cellular proliferation, thus a disturbance of the miRNA networks in RCC may influence this biological feature (19).

Cell migration and invasion. miR-21 was shown to promote tumor invasion (18). The oncogene TGM2, which is widely overexpressed in RCC tissues and is one target of the frequently down-regulated miR-1285, is linked to cell migration and invasion (19). miR-34a inhibits the oncogene myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (MYC) by binding to its 3’UTR, thereby suppressing the function of the MYC-S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (Skp2)-Myc-associated zinc-finger protein 1 (Miz1) complex, which normally activates the Ras homolog gene family, member A (RhoA) and the c-Myc-positive transcription elongation factor (P-TEFb) complex that extends transcription through RNA polymerase II, which, in turn, activates several genes in the RCC tumor cells (20). One study reported a typical metastatic signature in clear cell RCC that gradually develops over the course of tumor progression. Interestingly, 57% of the differentially expressed miRNAs found are organized in clusters that target the same molecule and thus could have a greater synergetic effect. VEGF, HIF1α, platelet-derived growth factor-beta (PDGFB), PDGFC, matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) and thymidylate synthase (TYMS) are key molecules that are targeted by multiple miRNAs which are dysregulated in metastatic clear cell RCC (19). The overexpression of miR-215 induces cell migration and invasion in vivo through the direct targeting of zinc finger E box-binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) and the subsequent promotion of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), thus affecting the metastatic potential of RCC cells (21). miR-708 expression is widely attenuated in RCC tissue. miR-708 targets ZEB2 and polycomb ring finger oncogene 1 (BMI1), proteins that are often up-regulated in cancer tissues. These proteins affect EMT, a key embryonic program that is reactivated inappropriately during tumor igenesis. The tumor suppressor miR-708 directly affects cell migration and invasion mediated by the reduced expression of the EMT regulators ZEB2 and BMI1, in parallel with the induction of E-cadherin expression and the suppression of fibronectin (22).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overview of the complex interaction signaling networks of renal cell carcinoma.

Apoptosis and cell cycle. The down-regulation of GSK3b caused by miR-199 overexpression leads to a down-regulation of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) and the anti-apoptotic B-cell chronic lymphatic leukemia/lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), mediated by nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells (NF-κB) (16). The restoration of miR-708 expression strongly induces apoptosis through the cleavage of caspase-7 and caspase-3 in RCC cell lines; this induction is mediated by the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor. The pro-apoptotic function of miR-708 may be mediated primarily through survivin, a cellular homeostasis regulator that modulates cell death, cell cycle and cell survival (22). G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, indicated by lower levels of cyclin D1 and MYC, are induced by the stable overexpression of miR-205 in RCC cells (17). As mentioned above, miR-21 targets several genes in RCC and plays a key role in the processes regulating cancer progression, including apoptosis. The inhibition of miR-21 leads to an increase in the proportion of cells in the G0/G1 phase in vitro through cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1S (cDKN1S or p21) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) up-regulation and a reduction in cyclin E2. Furthermore, a reduction of miR-21 inhibits the expression of the TNF receptor superfamily member 6 (FAS) ligand and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3), thus overriding the antiapoptotic function of miR-21 (18, 23). Proline oxidase (POX) is a mitochondrial tumor suppressor that induces apoptosis by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and repressing HIF signaling. POX is not detectable in RCC because it is targeted by the oncogene miR-23b, which is frequently up-regulated in RCC tissue (24).

Diagnosis

Today, an increasing number of RCC cases are detected at earlier stages due to the widespread use of imaging techniques (2). However, many early RCCs are not accurately distinguishable from other non-malignant renal lesions, which can lead to incorrect diagnoses and a high rate of unnecessary nephrectomies. In addition, after the successful resection of a histologically-confirmed RCC, patient surveillance relies mainly on imaging techniques and the evaluation of clinical symptoms. Therefore, novel biomarkers that can be detected in the blood or urine could enable early diagnosis with higher specificity and sensitivity and could provide tumor markers for the early detection of disease recurrence or metastatic lesions. miRNAs have great potential as novel biomarkers because they are stable in several body fluids, and they are easy and relatively inexpensive to detect by standard quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays (25). Several studies have discussed the diagnostic implications of serum miRNA levels in the diagnosis of RCC. For instance, circulating miR-1233 was described as a potential biomarker for RCC, although that study was limited by its lack of correlation of clinical and pathological parameters with the observed levels of miR-1233 expression (26). The characterization of RCC subtypes is of major clinical importance because each subtype has a different prognosis and future therapeutic approaches might include histology as a selection criterion (27). In this context, it should be noted that a molecular classification of RCCs based on miRNA expression and virtual karyotyping was able to differentiate amongst the four most common types of adult renal tumor using a small number of miRNAs (28). From a more clinical perspective with the aim of supporting diagnoses, a stepwise decision tree was created to differentiate between kidney cancer subtypes (clear cell, papillary and chromophobe) and oncocytoma, depending on the miRNA signatures in a maximum of four steps. This method is valuable in small biopsy samples, and in cases where the morphological assessment is not sufficient for diagnosis (29). This metastatic signature in RCCs, which includes several key molecules influencing metastasis development, may be a good biomarker for kidney cancer metastasis and may improve treatment selection in the future by enabling the identification of tumors with a high potential for metastasis (19). As a routine component of diagnosis and treatment, subtype- or stage-specific miRNA expression profiling may offer more personalized therapy and targeted treatments.

Prognosis

Several studies showed that aberrant miRNA expression is related to overall survival, disease stage and the development of metastases and recurrences. For instance, the expression of miR-21 is inversely-correlated with the overall survival of patients with RCC. A very high level of miR-21 expression is generally correlated with advanced stages of RCC, as is low miR-199a expression (16, 18). Meanwhile, miR-9-1 and miR-9-3 are both significantly down-regulated in RCC. The methylation levels of their encoding genes were found to be higher in the primary tumors of patients who developed a recurrence, compared to patients without a recurrence, with an almost 30-month decrease of the recurrence-free survival time (30). Another potential prognostic marker could be miR-708, which targets survivin, an independent predictor of progression and death in RCC. In patients with metastases, significant down-regulation of miR-106b was a predictive marker of early metastasis after nephrectomy (22, 31). Some studies showed that many miRNAs have the potential to be prognostic biomarkers. Large independent external validation studies have been performed for traditional prognostic models (32, 33), and therefore more validation studies on miRNAs are recommended.

Therapy

Several miRNAs that target key molecules in RCC pathogenesis were identified, and this role seems to make them an attractive option for future therapeutics. However, individual molecules can be targeted by different miRNAs, and a single miRNA can affect multiple targets along the same pathway, which can offer novel therapeutic opportunities but also raises potential complications. In RCC, miR-224 affects at least two molecules of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) pathway (namely SMAD4 and SMAD5), and miR-17-5p and miR-224 target the tumor suppressor VHL and the oncogenic HIF1α (10). Genistein, a chemopreventative agent, reduced miR-21 expression in vitro and in vivo, and mice injected with genistein-treated RCC cells (A-498) developed significantly smaller tumors than did control mice (18). miR-155 may function as an oncogene by inhibiting basic leucine zipper transcription factor 1 (BACH1). Therefore, targeting miR-155 using an anti-miRNA might provide a novel therapeutic approach (34). The up-regulation of miR-199 targets GSK3b and suppresses cancer cell growth; therefore, miR-199 may be useful as a new therapy (16). Another option for intervention may involve miR-205, which inhibits the proto-oncogenic Src family tyrosine kinases (SFKs) (17).

Conclusion

MicroRNAs are novel molecules that offer interesting insights into the pathogenesis of RCC. Further efforts are needed to decipher their roles in RCC, which might provide the basis for the use of these small molecules as “theranostics” in patients with RCC.

  • Received May 7, 2012.
  • Revision received July 21, 2012.
  • Accepted July 23, 2012.
  • Copyright© 2012 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel R,
    2. Naishadham D,
    3. Jemal A
    : Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 10-29, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Pichler M,
    2. Hutterer GC,
    3. Chromecki TF,
    4. Jesche J,
    5. Kampel-Kettner K,
    6. Pummer K,
    7. Zigeuner R
    : Renal cell carcinoma stage migration in a single European centre over 25 years: effects on 5- and 10-year metastasis-free survival. Int Urol Nephrol 44(4): 997-1004, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Pichler M,
    2. Hutterer GC,
    3. Chromecki TF,
    4. Jesche J,
    5. Groselj-Strele A,
    6. Kampel-Kettner K,
    7. Pummer K,
    8. Zigeuner R
    : Prognostic value of the Leibovich prognosis score supplemented by vascular invasion for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 187: 834-839, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pichler M,
    2. Hutterer GC,
    3. Chromecki TF,
    4. Jesche J,
    5. Kampel-Kettner K,
    6. Pummer K,
    7. Zigeuner R
    : Histologic tumor necrosis is an independent prognostic indicator for clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 137: 283-289, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sun M,
    2. Shariat SF,
    3. Cheng C,
    4. Ficarra V,
    5. Murai M,
    6. Oudard S,
    7. Pantuck AJ,
    8. Zigeuner R,
    9. Karakiewicz PI
    : Prognostic factors and predictive models in renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary review. Eur Urol 60: 644-661, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sonpavde G,
    2. Choueiri TK,
    3. Escudier B,
    4. Ficarra V,
    5. Hutson TE,
    6. Mulders PF,
    7. Patard JJ,
    8. Rini BI,
    9. Staehler M,
    10. Sternberg CN,
    11. Stief CG
    : Sequencing of agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: can we customize therapy? Eur Urol 61: 307-316, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Almeida MI,
    2. Reis RM,
    3. Calin GA
    : MicroRNAs and metastases – the neuroblastoma link. Cancer Biol Ther 9: 453-454, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Iorio MV,
    2. Croce CM
    : MicroRNA dysregulation in cancer: diagnostics, monitoring and therapeutics. A comprehensive review. EMBO Mol Med 4: 143-159, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. White NM,
    2. Bao TT,
    3. Grigull J,
    4. Youssef YM,
    5. Girgis A,
    6. Diamandis M,
    7. Fatoohi E,
    8. Metias M,
    9. Honey RJ,
    10. Stewart R,
    11. Pace KT,
    12. Bjarnason GA,
    13. Yousef GM
    : miRNA profiling for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: biomarker discovery and identification of potential controls and consequences of miRNA dysregulation. J Urol 186: 1077-1083, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Lichner Z,
    2. Mejia-Guerrero S,
    3. Ignacak M,
    4. Krizova A,
    5. Bao TT,
    6. Girgis AH,
    7. Youssef YM,
    8. Yousef GM
    : Pleiotropic action of renal cell carcinoma-dysregulated miRNAs on hypoxia-related signaling pathways. Am J Pathol 180: 1675-1687, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Valera VA,
    2. Walter BA,
    3. Linehan WM,
    4. Merino MJ
    : Regulatory Effects of microRNA-92 (miR-92) on VHL Gene Expression and the Hypoxic Activation of miR-210 in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Cancer 2: 515-526, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Song T,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Wang C,
    4. Wu Y,
    5. Cai W,
    6. Gao J,
    7. Hong B
    : MiR-138 suppresses expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma 786-O cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12: 1307-1311, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Nakada C,
    2. Tsukamoto Y,
    3. Matsuura K,
    4. Nguyen TL,
    5. Hijiya N,
    6. Uchida T,
    7. Sato F,
    8. Mimata H,
    9. Seto M,
    10. Moriyama M
    : Overexpression of miR-210, a downstream target of HIF1alpha, causes centrosome amplification in renal carcinoma cells. J Pathol 224: 280-288, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ha E,
    2. Bang JH,
    3. Son JN,
    4. Cho HC,
    5. Mun KC
    : Carbamylated albumin stimulates microRNA-146, which is increased in human renal cell carcinoma. Mol Med Report 3: 275-279, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hidaka H,
    2. Seki N,
    3. Yoshino H,
    4. Yamasaki T,
    5. Yamada Y,
    6. Nohata N,
    7. Fuse M,
    8. Nakagawa M,
    9. Enokida H
    : Tumor suppressive microRNA-1285 regulates novel molecular targets: Aberrant expression and functional significance in renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 3: 44-57, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Tsukigi M,
    2. Bilim V,
    3. Yuuki K,
    4. Ugolkov A,
    5. Naito S,
    6. Nagaoka A,
    7. Kato T,
    8. Motoyama T,
    9. Tomita Y
    : Re-expression of miR-199a suppresses renal cancer cell proliferation and survival by targeting GSK-3beta. Cancer Lett 315: 189-197, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Majid S,
    2. Saini S,
    3. Dar AA,
    4. Hirata H,
    5. Shahryari V,
    6. Tanaka Y,
    7. Yamamura S,
    8. Ueno K,
    9. Zaman MS,
    10. Singh K,
    11. Chang I,
    12. Deng G,
    13. Dahiya R
    : MicroRNA-205 inhibits Src-mediated oncogenic pathways in renal cancer. Cancer Res 71: 2611-2621, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Zaman MS,
    2. Shahryari V,
    3. Deng G,
    4. Thamminana S,
    5. Saini S,
    6. Majid S,
    7. Chang I,
    8. Hirata H,
    9. Ueno K,
    10. Yamamura S,
    11. Singh K,
    12. Tanaka Y,
    13. Tabatabai ZL,
    14. Dahiya R
    : Up-regulation of microRNA-21 correlates with kower kidney cancer survival. PLoS One 7: e31060, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Khella HW,
    2. White NM,
    3. Faragalla H,
    4. Gabril M,
    5. Boazak M,
    6. Dorian D,
    7. Khalil B,
    8. Antonios H,
    9. Bao TT,
    10. Pasic MD,
    11. Honey RJ,
    12. Stewart R,
    13. Pace KT,
    14. Bjarnason GA,
    15. Jewett MA,
    16. Yousef GM
    : Exploring the role of miRNAs in renal cell carcinoma progression and metastasis through bioinformatic and experimental analyses. Tumour Biol 33: 131-140, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Yamamura S,
    2. Saini S,
    3. Majid S,
    4. Hirata H,
    5. Ueno K,
    6. Chang I,
    7. Tanaka Y,
    8. Gupta A,
    9. Dahiya R
    : MicroRNA-34a suppresses malignant transformation by targeting c-Myc transcriptional complexes in human renal cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 33: 294-300, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. White NM,
    2. Khella HW,
    3. Grigull J,
    4. Adzovic S,
    5. Youssef YM,
    6. Honey RJ,
    7. Stewart R,
    8. Pace KT,
    9. Bjarnason GA,
    10. Jewett MA,
    11. Evans AJ,
    12. Gabril M,
    13. Yousef GM
    : miRNA profiling in metastatic renal cell carcinoma reveals a tumour-suppressor effect for miR-215. Br J Cancer 105: 1741-1749, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Saini S,
    2. Yamamura S,
    3. Majid S,
    4. Shahryari V,
    5. Hirata H,
    6. Tanaka Y,
    7. Dahiya R
    : MicroRNA-708 induces apoptosis and suppresses tumorigenicity in renal cancer cells. Cancer Res 71: 6208-6219, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Zhang A,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Shen Y,
    4. Xu Y,
    5. Li X
    : miR-21 modulates cell apoptosis by targeting multiple genes in renal cell carcinoma. Urology 78: 474 e13-19, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Liu W,
    2. Zabirnyk O,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Shiao YH,
    5. Nickerson ML,
    6. Khalil S,
    7. Anderson LM,
    8. Perantoni AO,
    9. Phang JM
    : miR-23b targets proline oxidase, a novel tumor suppressor protein in renal cancer. Oncogene 29: 4914-4924 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Cortez MA,
    2. Bueso-Ramos C,
    3. Ferdin J,
    4. Lopez-Berestein G,
    5. Sood AK,
    6. Calin GA
    : MicroRNAs in body fluids – the mix of hormones and biomarkers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8: 467-477, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Wulfken LM,
    2. Moritz R,
    3. Ohlmann C,
    4. Holdenrieder S,
    5. Jung V,
    6. Becker F,
    7. Herrmann E,
    8. Walgenbach-Brunagel G,
    9. von Ruecker A,
    10. Muller SC,
    11. Ellinger J
    : MicroRNAs in renal cell carcinoma: diagnostic implications of serum miR-1233 levels. PLoS One 6: e25787 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Leibovich BC,
    2. Lohse CM,
    3. Crispen PL,
    4. Boorjian SA,
    5. Thompson RH,
    6. Blute ML,
    7. Cheville JC
    : Histological subtype is an independent predictor of outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 183: 1309-1315, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Powers MP,
    2. Alvarez K,
    3. Kim HJ,
    4. Monzon FA
    : Molecular classification of adult renal epithelial neoplasms using microRNA expression and virtual karyotyping. Diagn Mol Pathol 20: 63-70, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Youssef YM,
    2. White NM,
    3. Grigull J,
    4. Krizova A,
    5. Samy C,
    6. Mejia-Guerrero S,
    7. Evans A,
    8. Yousef GM
    : Accurate molecular classification of kidney cancer subtypes using microRNA signature. Eur Urol 59: 721-730, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Hildebrandt MA,
    2. Gu J,
    3. Lin J,
    4. Ye Y,
    5. Tan W,
    6. Tamboli P,
    7. Wood CG,
    8. Wu X
    : Hsa-miR-9 methylation status is associated with cancer development and metastatic recurrence in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene 29: 5724-5728, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Slaby O,
    2. Jancovicova J,
    3. Lakomy R,
    4. Svoboda M,
    5. Poprach A,
    6. Fabian P,
    7. Kren L,
    8. Michalek J,
    9. Vyzula R
    : Expression of miRNA-106b in conventional renal cell carcinoma is a potential marker for prediction of early metastasis after nephrectomy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29: 90, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Pichler M,
    2. Hutterer GC,
    3. Chromecki TF,
    4. Jesche J,
    5. Kampel-Kettner K,
    6. Rehak P,
    7. Pummer K,
    8. Zigeuner R
    : External validation of the Leibovich prognosis score for nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma at a single European center applying routine pathology. J Urol 186: 1773-1777, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Zigeuner R,
    2. Hutterer G,
    3. Chromecki T,
    4. Imamovic A,
    5. Kampel-Kettner K,
    6. Rehak P,
    7. Langner C,
    8. Pummer K
    : External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology. Eur Urol 57: 102-109, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Zucchi A,
    2. Novara G,
    3. Costantini E,
    4. Antonelli A,
    5. Carini M,
    6. Carmignani G,
    7. Cosciani Cunico S,
    8. Fontana D,
    9. Longo N,
    10. Martignoni G,
    11. Minervini A,
    12. Mirone V,
    13. Porena M,
    14. Roscigno M,
    15. Schiavina R,
    16. Simeone C,
    17. Simonato A,
    18. Siracusano S,
    19. Terrone C,
    20. Ficarra V
    : Prognostic factors in a large multi-institutional series of papillary renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 109: 1140-1146, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 32, Issue 9
September 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MicroRNAs in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
MicroRNAs in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy
BADER MOHAMAD AL-ALI, ANNA LENA RESS, ARMIN GERGER, MARTIN PICHLER
Anticancer Research Sep 2012, 32 (9) 3727-3732;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
MicroRNAs in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy
BADER MOHAMAD AL-ALI, ANNA LENA RESS, ARMIN GERGER, MARTIN PICHLER
Anticancer Research Sep 2012, 32 (9) 3727-3732;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MicroRNAs
    • MicroRNAs and the Pathophysiology of RCC
    • Diagnosis
    • Prognosis
    • Therapy
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • miR-200c Targets CDK2 and Suppresses Tumorigenesis in Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • MicroRNAs in Testicular Cancer: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy
  • MicroRNAs in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy
  • Antisense Oligonucleotide Treatment Enhances the Recovery of Acute Lung Injury through IL-10-Secreting M2-like Macrophage-Induced Expansion of CD4+ Regulatory T Cells
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Invasive-Front P21 Expression Is Associated With Tumor Aggressiveness in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Isolation and Biological Evaluation of Breast Cancer Side Population Cells Using DyeCycle Violet
  • Serum Extracellular Vesicles Double-positive for CD9 and CD147 or for CD9 and CD63 Decrease After Surgical Resection in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Potential Biomarkers of Residual Tumor
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire