Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Whole-transcriptome Analysis Reveals Established and Novel Associations with TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion in Prostate Cancer

ANTHONY CHOW, YUTAKA AMEMIYA, LINDA SUGAR, ROBERT NAM and ARUN SETH
Anticancer Research September 2012, 32 (9) 3629-3641;
ANTHONY CHOW
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUTAKA AMEMIYA
2Genomics Core Facility, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LINDA SUGAR
3Department of Pathology, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERT NAM
4Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ARUN SETH
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
3Department of Pathology, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
5Platform Biological Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: arun.seth{at}utoronto.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Shortcomings of current methods of prostate cancer detection call for improved biomarkers. The transmembrane protease, serine 2:ets-related gene (TMPRSS2:ERG) gene fusion leads to the overexpression of ERG, an E-twenty six (ETS) family transcription factor, and is the most prevalent genetic lesion in prostate cancer, but its clinical utility remains unclear. Materials and Methods: Two radical prostatectomy samples were analysed by next-generation whole-transcriptome sequencing. The chosen samples differed in fusion gene status, as previously determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: Next-generation sequencing identified the involvement of novel and previously reported prostate cancer-related transcripts, the WNT signalling pathway, evasion of p53-mediated anti-proliferation and several ETS-regulated pathways in the prostate cancer cases examined. Overexpression of Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor (RhoGDIB), a gene associated with fusion-positive prostate cancer, was found to elicit spindle-shaped morphology, faster cell migration and increased cell proliferation, phenotypic changes suggestive of cancer progression. Conclusion: The present findings confirm the value of comprehensive sequencing for biomarker development and provide potential avenues of future study.

  • TMPRSS2:ERG
  • fusion gene
  • whole-transcriptome analysis
  • RNA sequencing
  • prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer affecting Canadian men, yet current non-invasive methods for its detection, such as the digital rectal exam and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement, are inadequate – in fact, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recently assigned PSA-based screening for prostate cancer a grade D recommendation, which represents the lowest possible confidence in the test's ability to provide a net clinical benefit (1). This decision was motivated by the fact that these measures cannot distinguish between benign hypertrophy and carcinoma (2). In fact, no existing methods can predict whether a particular instance of the disease is likely to recur after treatment or metastasize (3), so there is a great need for the identification and testing of novel biomarkers by which prostate cancer prognosis may be improved.

In humans, the E-twenty six (ETS) family of transcription factors comprises of 27 members which share a highly conserved DNA-binding motif known as the ETS domain. Recently, these proteins were organised into four classes based on differences in their DNA binding profiles (4). They respond to a variety of signals and participate in diverse processes, including development, differentiation, cell cycle control and apoptosis (5), and are therefore also often implicated in disease, including prostate cancer (6).

One particular ETS member, ets-related gene (ERG), participates in the direct transactivation of genes associated with cancer, including vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, frizzled-4 and ras homolog J (RHOJ) (7-9). ERG is frequently involved in genomic lesions characteristic of diseases such as Ewing sarcoma, acute myeloid leukemia and prostate cancer (10). Furthermore, ERG overexpression on its own has been shown to be sufficient to transform mouse fibroblast cells in vitro and in vivo (11).

Transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2):ERG gene fusion causes the expression of ERG to become androgen-sensitive, due to a gene re-arrangement event that relocates ERG proximal to the androgen-responsive element of the TMPRSS2 promoter (12). Its occurrence in approximately half of all prostate carcinomas (13) has made it a promising biomarker for the disease. Indeed, its detection in biopsies (14), urine (15) and serum (16) is being actively investigated for diagnostic and prognostic benefit, although there is evidence that contests its predictive ability (17). Improved understanding of the mechanisms by which TMPRSS2:ERG contributes to prostate cancer initiation and progression is therefore necessary to evaluate its potential as a clinically relevant biomarker.

Also of interest is Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor β (RhoGDIB), whose expression has been positively correlated with TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status (18). As Rho activity is strongly implicated in cell motility and metastasis (19), RhoGDIB and its gene product are liable to be important mediators of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-related prostate cancer.

In this study, the Applied Biosystems SOLiD next-generation sequencing system was used to assess the prostate cancer relevance of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion by analysing total mRNA transcription from two radical prostatectomy samples (20). The chosen samples were alike in their aggressiveness but differed in fusion gene status. SOLiD sequencing yields data comparable to those obtained through oligonucleotide microarrays and has the advantage of being better-able to identify novel transcripts, sequence variations and splicing events (21). Individual and comparative analysis of our selected transcriptomes is expected to yield insights into transcriptional events that contribute to prostate cancer, which may be applicable to biomarker development. In addition, in vitro examination of a potential ERG target gene, RhoGDIB, was performed to validate one such transcriptional point of interest.

Materials and Methods

RNA samples. Out of 139 radical prostatectomy samples that had previously been determined to differ in fusion gene status by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (20) and analysed by Illumina's 502-gene Human Cancer Panel (18), two were selected for whole-transcriptome analysis. A sample of tissue was selected for RNA extraction, as previously described (20). Briefly, specimens were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen upon collection, quadrisected, and sectioned into 5-μm slices. Haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were analysed by the pathologist, who marked regions of tumour from which RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada). RNA concentration and integrity were determined via Nanodrop 1000 (Nanodrop, Wilmington, DE, USA) spectrophotometry and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with the RNA6000 Nano chip (Agilent Technologies Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada), respectively, according to manufacturers' instructions. Poly(A) RNA was then selectively enriched from the total RNA using the MicroPoly(A) Purist kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). This enrichment was performed in two rounds to minimize rRNA contamination in the poly(A) RNA fraction. The absence of 18S and 28S rRNA was confirmed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with the RNA 6000 Pico kit.

SOLiD system whole-transcriptome sequencing. Whole-transcriptome next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions on an Applied Biosystems SOLiD System (Life Technologies). Briefly, Poly(A) RNA from two samples was fragmented using RNase III, ligated to P1 and P2 adaptors and reverse-transcribed into a cDNA library. This library was then size-selected using the Agencourt AMPure XP reagent (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and amplified by PCR with barcoded primers using the SOLiD RNA Barcoding Kit (Applied Biosystems). The concentrations of transcripts were quantified in triplicate using the SOLiD Library TaqMan Quantitation Kit (Applied Biosystems). Resultant barcoded cDNA libraries were pooled together in equal concentrations, driven onto beads to generate bead clones by emulsion PCR, then deposited on a glass slide. Paired-end (50 bp + 35 bp) sequencing was conducted using the SOLiD analyzer.

Sequencing data analysis. Resultant data were filtered for colourspace quality, depleted of non-mRNA reads and mapped to the NCBI B36 human genome assembly using the Geospiza software package (Geospiza, Seattle, WA, USA; www.geospiza.com). Secondary analysis normalised read counts to reads per million (RPM), identified sequence variations and matched data with Ref Seq ID. Genesifter software version 4.1 (www.genesifter.net) was used for statistical analysis in terms of relative expression, alone or organised into gene ontologies and Kyoto Encylopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)-curated pathways.

Plasmids. A 1234-bp region immediately upstream of the RhoGDIB translation start site was amplified from VCaP genomic DNA using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs Canada, Pickering, ON, Canada) and cloned using XhoI and BglII restriction sites into a luciferase reporter vector, pGL4.28 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), to generate pGL-RGBpro-Luc. A full-length RhoGDIB protein coding region was amplified and cloned using BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites into pCMV-Tag 2B (Agilent) to generate pCMV-RhoGDIB. An expression construct designed to produce the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion protein (22) was cloned using HindIII and XhoI restriction sites into pCMV-Tag 2B, yielding pCMV-ΔNERG. pCMV-mutERG was generated from pCMV-ΔNERG by removal of the 255-bp sequence that codes for the ETS domain. SalI restriction sites were formed at both ends of the target sequence using PfuTurbo DNA polymerase (Agilent) amplification of the pCMV-ΔNERG template.

Cell culture. HEK 293 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Life Technologies), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS); PC3 cells were purchased from ATCC; they and their derivatives were grown in DMEM/F12 (1:1) (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS (complete medium). PC3-7C were derived from PC3 (prostate bone metastasis cells) via transfection with pCMV-RhoGDIB using the LipoD 293 transfection reagent (SignaGen, Rockville, MD). Importantly, PC3 do not harbour the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion (23). Stable selection was performed by culturing cells in complete medium with 300 μg/ml geneticin beginning 48 h post-transfection. Surviving colonies were separately grown in a 96-well plate and assayed for Flag-RhoGDIB expression by western blots.

Luciferase reporter assay. Two days before assay, 5×104 HEK 293 cells were plated in a 24-well plate and cultured overnight. Cells were then transfected with either 250 ng each pGL-RGBpro-Luc and pCMV-ΔNERG or pGL-RGBpro-Luc and pCMV using LipoD 293, as above. Luciferase activity was assayed the following day, using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were lysed in 40 μl Passive Lysis Buffer; 20 μl of this lysate were then added to 100 μl Luciferase Assay Reagent. Luciferase activity from the reaction was measured over 10 sec with a Lumat LB 9501 luminometer (Berthold Technologies, Oak Ridge, TN, USA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of sequencing data for two radical prostatectomy samples.

Wound-closure assay. One day before assay, 2.4×105 PC3 and PC3-7C cells were plated in a 6-well plate and cultured overnight. Cells were then scratched with a 10-μl micropipette tip, rinsed once with complete medium, and cultured in 2 ml complete medium with 6 μl 500 mM hydroxyurea. Images were captured using the AxioVert software (Carl Zeiss Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada) over the subsequent 48 h.

3H-Thymidine assay. PC3 and PC3-7C cells were transiently transfected with pCMV-ΔNERG as described above and used for experiments after 48 h. In a 96-well plate, 5,000 PC3 and PC3-7C cells, with or without pCMV-ΔNERG transfection, were plated in triplicate in 100 μl complete medium and cultured for 24 or 72 h, after which time 10 μl 1 μCi/ml 3H-thymidine in PBS was added to each well. After 6 h, cells were harvested and scintillation counts were performed. Differences were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's post-hoc test using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA); p<0.05 was deemed significant.

Results

Primary analysis of whole-transcriptome sequencing data. To investigate transcriptional characteristics of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-dependent and -independent prostate cancer, RNA from the two samples were subjected to whole-transcriptome sequencing using the SOLiD System. Over 50 million reads were obtained from each sample and 75.99% of these were mapped to the NCBI B36 genome assembly; approximately 40% of all reads mapped to exons and introns, while only 7.43% of reads mapped to intergenic sequences (Table I).

Between the two samples, 23,187 genes were identified with at least one read in one sample, representing 88.8% of genes in the database. After filtering-out genes with fewer than 10 mapped reads, 19,625 remained for further analysis. Of these, 5,885 were significantly differentially expressed by more than two-fold between samples, as determined by the Genesifter software, version 4.1 (Figure 1).

ETS, ETS-targeted genes and established prostate cancer-related transcripts were differentially expressed. Many ETS family members are implicated in prostate cancer (6) and in this study, they and several target genes were represented in the group of very highly expressed genes. Ets variant 1 (ETV1) expression was higher in the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-negative sample while early growth response protein 1 (EGR1) expression was higher in the fusion-positive sample (Table II). RhoGDIB stood out for being expressed 14.16-fold more in the fusion-positive sample (Figure 2A). These findings stress the involvement of ETS pathways in prostate cancer.

Also represented in a survey of genes that were highly expressed (RPM >500) in either sample or both were a host of genes and transcripts reportedly associated with prostate cancer, including metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1), transmembrane BAX inhibitor motif containing 6 (TMBIM6), cathepsin B (CTSB) and FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog (FOS) (Table II).

RhoGDIB promoter region contains multiple ETS binding sites (EBS) and responds to ΔN-ERG overexpression. The striking difference in the expression of RhoGDIB (Table II), its previous associations with the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion and the presence of multiple putative EBS upstream of the RhoGDIB gene (Figure 2B), motivated us to examine whether RhoGDIB expression is regulated by the ERG protein. To this end, pGL-RGBpro-Luc, which positions the RhoGDIB promoter region upstream of the luc2CP reporter gene (Figure 2C), was co-transfected with either pCMV, pCMV-ΔNERG or pCMV-mutERG, into HEK 293 cells. Co-transfection with pCMV-ΔNERG caused an increase in luciferase reporter gene activity relative to pCMV and pCMV-mutERG (Figure 2D), suggesting that the ERG protein is sufficient and the ETS domain is necessary for inducing RhoGDIB expression.

RhoGDIB overexpression increases prostate cancer cell motility and rate of proliferation. To determine the consequences of RhoGDIB overexpression, PC3-7C, a RhoGDIB-overexpressing cell line, was derived by cloning full-length RhoGDIB into pCMV-Tag 2B and stably transfecting the recombinant vector into PC3 cells. PC3 was selected for its TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-negative status and low endogenous RhoGDIB expression (Figure 3A). Visual inspection of PC3-7C cells, cultured alongside parental PC3 cells under identical conditions revealed more spindle-shaped cells in the former (Figure 3B).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Scatterplot of expression of transcripts identified by whole-transcriptome sequencing. The 5,885 genes that were differentially expressed between the two samples are marked with red dots, if more highly expressed, and green dots, if less highly expressed, in the fusion-positive sample. Genes of particular interest are highlighted. RPM: Reads per million; ACPP: acid phosphatase, prostate; AMACR: α-methylacyl-CoA racemase; ARHGDIB: Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor β; ERG: ets-related gene; ETV1: ets variant 1; IGFBP3: insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3; IGF1: insulin-like growth factor 1; LEF1: lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1; MALAT1: metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1; PIK3R5: phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 5; TMPRSS2: transmembrane protease, serine 2.

As a spindle-shaped morphology is suggestive of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (24), a wound-healing assay was performed to further assess this change in cell behaviour. Monolayers of PC3-7C and parental PC3 cells were scratched and allowed to recover to determine their translational migration ability. Cells were cultured in the presence of hydroxyurea to eliminate differential proliferation from being a confounding variable. PC3 cells required over 30 h, while PC3-7C cells required about 24 h to close gaps of comparable width (Figure 3C), suggesting that RhoGDIB expression contributes positively to cell migration.

In order to determine whether RhoGDIB affected cell proliferation, a 3H-thymidine incorporation assay was performed. Cultured PC3-7C and parental PC3 cells were exposed to 3H-thymidine for 6 h. Subsequent results showed that PC3-7C cells incorporated much more of the radioactive label and that this effect was amplified by transient transfection with ΔN-ERG (Figure 3D).

Expression of wingless-integration 1 (WNT) pathway members were higher in the fusion-positive sample. The Genesifter software was used to identify KEGG molecular interaction and reaction pathways in which many genes were differentially expressed between the fusion-positive and fusion-negative samples. In the fusion-positive sample, this led to the discovery of a gene expression profile consistent with increased WNT signalling (Figure 4). Up-regulation of WNT signalling is associated with prostate cancer (25). Genes throughout the signalling cascade were found to be more highly expressed in the fusion-positive sample, with lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) being the most striking of these (35.18-fold higher). In concert with these differences, genes of the glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β-inhibiting phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway were expressed at higher levels, while adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) itself was expressed at a lower level. In contrast, several frizzled family genes were less highly expressed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Expression of prostate cancer-related genes of interest.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Expression of p53-regulated genes that were differentially expressed between the fusion-positive and fusion-negative samples.

A p53 variant and lower expression of many p53 effectors were observed in the fusion-negative sample. Analysis of the sequencing data revealed the presence of a well-known single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of p53, rs1042522, in the fusion-negative sample only. This SNP represents a C to G substitution that results in arginine instead of proline at residue 72 of the p53 protein and may be associated with prostate cancer (26). Interestingly, a large number of p53 target genes were found to be less strongly expressed in the fusion-negative sample (Table III), including 14-3-3σ (7.31-fold lower) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) (6.82-fold lower). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) was expressed 2.68-fold higher. Notably, these differences in p53 effector gene expression occur in the absence of a corresponding disparity in p53 expression.

Discussion

In this study, we took advantage of the comprehensive nature of whole-transcriptome sequencing to examine the expression of established prostate cancer-related genes and to elucidate novel associations between the disease and oncogenes/tumour suppressor genes. The results provide insights into both TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-associated and unrelated prostate cancer.

Components of the ETS and TMPRSS2:ERG gene pathways were found to be dysregulated in this study. First, TMPRSS2 expression was dramatically lower in the fusion-positive sample, an expected consequence of the TMPRSS2 gene being either deleted or translocated from its promoter during the process of fusion gene formation (12); accordingly, ERG expression was higher in that sample. Interestingly, ETV1, an ETS gene whose full-length, truncated and fusion transcripts have all been associated with prostate cancer (27), was much more highly expressed in the fusion-negative sample. ETV1 is, after ERG, the second-most frequently overexpressed gene in prostate cancer and its overexpression can be effected by any number of fusions or no fusion at all (10,27). The pattern of TMPRSS2, ERG, and ETV1 expression observed here is suggestive of ETS involvement in both samples. Two ETS-targeted genes, EGR1 and RhoGDIB, were highly expressed in the fusion-positive sample. EGR1 is a target of ETS1 implicated in transformation (28). It positively regulates interleukin 8 expression and enables soft agar growth and Matrigel invasion of prostate cancer cells (29). Consistent with this, in this study, IL8 was up-regulated by more than four-fold in the fusion-positive sample. Other studies in prostate cell lines have found that EGR1 is also an intermediary player in proteinase-activated receptor 1 (PAR1)-induced invasion (30) and E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1)-mediated apoptosis evasion (31). In addition, at least ETS1 and friend leukemia integration 1 transcription factor (FLI-1) were previously shown to bind to EBS within the EGR1 promoter region and promote its transcription (28). Given the similarities between ETS1, FLI-1 and ERG in terms of protein domains and DNA-binding specificity profiles (4), the present findings suggest that ERG also participates in EGR1- associated cell survival and invasion.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Ets-related gene (ERG) positively regulated Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor β (RhoGDIB) expression. A: RhoGDIB expression in the fusion-positive and fusion-negative samples, as measured by next-generation sequencing (NGS). B: The promoter region upstream of RhoGDIB contains many putative E-twenty six (ETS) binding sites (highlighted). C: Structure of pGL-RGBpro-Luc. D: Luciferase reporter gene activity from HEK 293 cells transfected with pGL-RGBpro-Luc and co-transfected with pCMV or pCMV-ΔNERG. Data are the mean±SE from triplicate measures and are representative of multiple experiments; *significant differences between fusion-negative and fusion-positive samples by t-test (p=0.0011).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Effects of Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor β (RhoGDIB) overexpression on cell proliferation, motility and morphology. A: Immunoblot of endogenous RhoGDIB expression in five prostate cell lines. β-Tubulin was used as a loading control. B: Morphology of PC3-7C cells (which stably overexpress RhoGDIB) and parental PC3 cells in cell culture. C: Wound healing assay performed with PC3-7C and parental PC3 cells, cultured in the presence of 1.5 mM hydroxyurea to prevent proliferation. D: 3H-Thymidine incorporation by PC3-7C and parental PC3 cells, with or without ΔN-ERG overexpression. Data are the mean±SE from triplicate measures and are representative of multiple experiments; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.001).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Diagram representing the expression levels of wingless-integration 1 (WNT) signalling pathway genes in the fusion-positive sample relative to the fusion-negative sample. Higher WNT and phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 5 (PIK3R5) and lower adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) expression are consistent with increased β-catenin signalling in the nucleus. This leads to increased expression of WNT pathway targets such as T-cell factor 7 (TCF7) and lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1), contributing to proliferation and evasion of apoptosis. Differentially expressed members of gene families are indicated by gene symbol. FZD: Frizzled; GSK: glycogen synthase kinase; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PKB: protein kinase B.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Model showing how fusion genes and wingless-integration 1 (WNT) signalling form a positive feedback loop. Overexpression of genes in the WNT pathway mimics WNT signalling, leading to β-catenin stabilization. β-Catenin binds to androgen receptor (AR) and increases its responsiveness to androgens but decreases its responsiveness to inhibitors, favouring AR-mediated transactivation. This, in turn, increases the expression of ets-related gene (ERG) from the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene which feeds back into the WNT pathway.

Expression of RhoGDIB has been correlated with ETS1 expression (32), TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-positive status (18) and, in this study, ERG overexpression. RhoGDIB is a GDP dissociation inhibitor and, as the term implies, functions as a negative regulator of Rho-family GTPase signalling, either by inhibiting the latter's exchange of GDP for GTP or by sequestering it when GTP bound, and can affect the activity of RhoA, cell division cycle 24 (CDC24) and Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC1) (33). The balance between the activity of these GTPases ultimately determines cytoskeletal arrangement and related outcomes, such as invasion ability (19), and indeed, RhoGDIB expression has been paradoxically shown to be stimulatory of breast cancer (34) and inhibitory of lung cancer (35) metastasis. The present study showed that PC3-7C cells, derivatives of PC3 cells stably-overexpressing RhoGDIB, have a spindle-shaped cell morphology. This morphological change is suggestive of cytoskeletal rearrangement and increased cell motility (24) and accordingly, RhoGDIB overexpression also increased the rate of translational cell migration, as determined by wound healing assays. Furthermore, according to 3H-thymidine incorporation assays, PC3-7C cells proliferate more readily than parental PC3 cells, especially with concomitant ΔN-ERG overexpression. Taken together, these results point to a contribution by RhoGDIB in the development and progression of prostate cancer, particularly under the influence of TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion.

A subset of genes that has been previously associated with prostate cancer was also identified by NGS. MALAT1 is transcribed into a non-coding RNA that has been shown to be significantly overexpressed in approximately 25% of prostate cancer samples and, remarkably in one study, in every instance was more highly expressed in a tumour sample than in the matched normal counterpart (36). Bcl-2-assciated X protein (BAX) inhibitor-1 (BI-1) is a potent suppressor of physiologically, and pharmaceutically-mediated apoptosis (37). BI-1 is up-regulated in human prostate tumours and knockdown of BI-1 is sufficient for inducing apoptosis in a variety of prostate cancer cell lines (38). Cathepsin B, a protease implicated in extracellular matrix degradation and metastasis, is overexpressed in prostate cancer (39). FOS is part of the dimeric activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor, which has been linked to advanced prostate cancer (40). The findings from this study add to the body of research indicating the involvement of these genes in prostate cancer and additionally point to their usefulness as biomarkers, given the high levels at which they were expressed.

Also highly expressed were two prostate cancer biomarkers that are of current interest in the field: α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) (Table II). AMACR was first identified as being overexpressed in prostate cancer through DNA microarray analysis and found to be very sensitive and specific at detecting prostate cancer in prostate needle biopsies (41). It has since found important applications, when combined with other markers, in detecting small cancerous lesions (42), and in deciding histologically-ambiguous cases (43), but its uses are limited to post-screening biopsy analysis. Here, we found AMACR to be highly expressed only in the fusion-negative sample, highlighting the heterogeneity of prostate cancer in terms of biomarker expression. PAP was the first serum biomarker for prostate cancer. PAP screening has been obsolete since the discovery of PSA (44), but serum levels of PAP have since been found to be predictive of biochemical recurrence (45). This coincides with the present finding of increased PAP expression in the fusion-negative sample, which was derived from a patient who suffered biochemical recurrence.

Organising the transcriptome data according to KEGG pathways uncovered patterns that were indicative of WNT pathway dysregulation. In the canonical WNT pathway, WNT ligand binding inhibits the formation of the GSK-3β/APC/axin complex, thereby sparing β-catenin from degradation. β-Catenin then accumulates and translocates to the nucleus, where it activates downstream effectors via the T-cell factor (TCF)/lymphoid enhancer-binding factor (LEF) family of transcription factors (46). These effectors include c-MYC, cyclin D1 and survivin, and are responsible for such outcomes as proliferation and apoptosis evasion (47,48), hence dysregulation of this pathway is a feature of many types of cancer (46). By virtue of their contributions to this pathway, increased expression of WNT, frizzled, TCF7 and LEF1 and decreased APC expression are all generally suggestive of a contributory role for WNT signalling in TMPRSS2:ERG-related prostate cancer. The PI3K pathway also positively modulates WNT signalling by inhibiting GSK-3β, similar to the action of dishevelled protein. Mutations of PI3K itself are very frequent in cancer and aberrations in the PI3K pathways are a feature of all human carcinomas (49). The increased expression in the fusion-positive sample of the PI3K family gene PIK3R5 lends additional credibility to WNT signalling as a mediator of fusion gene-associated prostate cancer. Furthermore, β-catenin, whose protein level is controlled by WNT signalling, directly binds to and acts on androgen receptor (AR). Clinically, androgen deprivation often leads to at least temporary prostate cancer remission (50) and in the laboratory, androgens are necessary for tumour induction. β-Catenin has been shown to have myriad effects on androgen receptor signalling, including modifying its ligand specificity, increasing its sensitivity to androgens and decreasing its responsiveness to inhibitors, such as bicalutamide (51). Given that overexpression of ERG in TMPRSS2:ERG-positive tumours is caused by the placement of ERG under androgen-sensitive transcription, the up-regulation of WNT pathway components observed in this study alludes to a potential positive feedback loop between gene fusion, WNT pathway up-regulation, increased β-catenin levels and AR modulation (Figure 5). The unexpected decrease in expression of frizzled 3 (FZD3), FZD4 and FZD8 may be indicative of negative feedback regulation in the WNT pathway, although such regulation has only previously been reported to occur via lysosomal degradation of the dishevelled protein (52). In medulloblastoma tissues and cell lines, frizzled receptor expression has been found to be inconsistently up- and down-regulated (53), so perhaps there is a similar need to clarify the significance of frizzled receptor expression in prostate cancer.

Additionally, KEGG-assisted analysis drew attention to lower expression of many p53 target genes, particularly those involved in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, in the fusion-negative sample. The transcription factor p53 is credited with activating DNA repair, promoting senescence and initiating apoptosis upon detection of DNA damage and is therefore a crucial tumour suppressor (54). Decreased expression of p53 targets is therefore consistent with a disease state that is less responsive to antiproliferative signals. A remarkable proportion of the p53-mediated cell cycle genes examined, were specifically involved in pharmaceutically-induced arrest in prostate cancer. p21 initiates cell cycle arrest in G2 and mediates growth inhibition in prostate cancer cells in response to treatment with G-1, a potential anticancer agent (55). Similarly, growth arrest and DNA damage 45 (GADD45) causes G1 arrest and is responsible for the antitumor activity of fucoxanthin in liver and prostate cells (56). 14-3-3σ has been shown to be expressed at successively lower levels in normal prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma (57). These genes for cell-cycle control were all expressed at lower levels in the fusion-negative sample. Several apoptosis-inducing effectors of p53 signalling were also less highly expressed in the fusion-negative sample, again with strong representation from genes mediating drug action in prostate cancer. FAS, caspase-8 and BH3 interacting domain death agonist (BID) positively regulate the caspase cascade and apoptosis. Upon binding FAS ligand, FAS promotes caspase-8 and subsequently BID cleavage. Cloven BID translocates to mitochondria to initiate apoptosis, and this activity was found to be essential to the anticancer action of 2-methoxyestradiol through in vitro and in vivo models of prostate cancer (58). IGFBP3 activates apoptosis pathways independently, by activating the caspase cascade (45), and in concert with its IGF1-sequestering effect, including that as a mediator of 5-fluorouracil activity (59). Interestingly, IGF1 was more highly expressed in the fusion-negative sample, further contributing to decreased apoptosis (60). Transcriptome sequencing revealed that the SNP rs1042522, encoding a P72R variant of p53, was present in the fusion-negative sample. Though automated phylogenetic and structural analysis by PolyPhen-2 (61) predicts this polymorphism to be benign, the 72R form has been reported to be much more efficient at inducing apoptosis (62) but less active at transactivation of target genes (63). The expression profile of cell-cycle and apoptosis control genes in the fusion-negative sample is consistent with the impaired transactivation ability of the 72R variant of p53. Taken together, these findings suggest that the rs1042522 polymorphism impairs the ability of p53 to act as a tumour suppressor. The involvement of affected downstream genes in mechanisms of anticancer drug action additionally stresses the clinical relevance of this polymorphism. These findings also demonstrate the usefulness of transcriptome sequencing for investigation of gene variants and polymorphisms.

The current study demonstrates the utility of whole-transcriptome sequencing for confirming established associations of genes with disease and for forming new associations of this kind. Further investigation of the genes and pathways identified in this manner will provide insights into mechanisms contributory to prostate cancer and the involvement of TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion therein. This, in turn, can guide the discovery and evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for prostate cancer.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded in part by the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (grant no. 019038). The Authors thank Stephanie Bacopulos for her assistance in compiling and editing the manuscript, Tania Benatar for her technical expertise in performing 3H-thymidine assays and Wenyi Yang for his advice throughout the cloning process. RNA-Seq analysis was done at the Sunnybrook Research Institute Genomics Core Facility.

  • Received May 22, 2012.
  • Revision received July 22, 2012.
  • Accepted July 23, 2012.
  • Copyright© 2012 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chou R,
    2. Croswell JM,
    3. Dana T,
    4. Bougatsos C,
    5. Blazina I,
    6. Fu R,
    7. Gleitsmann K,
    8. Koenig HC,
    9. Lam C,
    10. Maltz A,
    11. Rugge JB,
    12. Lin K
    : Screening for prostate cancer: A review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 155: 762-771, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Gomella LG,
    2. Liu XS,
    3. Trabulsi EJ,
    4. Kelly WK,
    5. Myers R,
    6. Showalter T,
    7. Dicker A,
    8. Wender R
    : Screening for prostate cancer: The current evidence and guidelines controversy. Can J Urol 18: 5875-5883, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Rubin MA
    : Targeted therapy of cancer: New roles for pathologists – prostate cancer. Mod Pathol 21(Suppl 2): S44-S55, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Wei GH,
    2. Badis G,
    3. Berger MF,
    4. Kivioja T,
    5. Palin K,
    6. Enge M,
    7. Bonke M,
    8. Jolma A,
    9. Varjosalo M,
    10. Gehrke AR,
    11. Yan J,
    12. Talukder S,
    13. Turunen M,
    14. Taipale M,
    15. Stunnenberg HG,
    16. Ukkonen E,
    17. Hughes TR,
    18. Bulyk ML,
    19. Taipale J
    : Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo. EMBO J 29: 2147-2160, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sharrocks AD,
    2. Brown AL,
    3. Ling Y,
    4. Yates PR
    : The ETS-domain transcription factor family. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 29: 1371-1387, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hollenhorst PC,
    2. Ferris MW,
    3. Hull MA,
    4. Chae H,
    5. Kim S,
    6. Graves BJ
    : Oncogenic ETS proteins mimic activated RAS/MAPK signaling in prostate cells. Genes Dev 25: 2147-2157, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Birdsey GM,
    2. Dryden NH,
    3. Amsellem V,
    4. Gebhardt F,
    5. Sahnan K,
    6. Haskard DO,
    7. Dejana E,
    8. Mason JC,
    9. Randi AM
    : Transcription factor Erg regulates angiogenesis and endothelial apoptosis through VE-cadherin. Blood 111: 3498-3506, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gupta S,
    2. Iljin K,
    3. Sara H,
    4. Mpindi JP,
    5. Mirtti T,
    6. Vainio P,
    7. Rantala J,
    8. Alanen K,
    9. Nees M,
    10. Kallioniemi O
    : FZD4 as a mediator of ERG oncogene-induced WNT signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 70: 6735-6745, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Yuan L,
    2. Sacharidou A,
    3. Stratman AN,
    4. Le BA,
    5. Zwiers PJ,
    6. Spokes K,
    7. Bhasin M,
    8. Shih SC,
    9. Nagy JA,
    10. Molema G,
    11. Aird WC,
    12. Davis GE,
    13. Oettgen P
    : RhoJ is an endothelial cell-restricted Rho GTPase that mediates vascular morphogenesis and is regulated by the transcription factor ERG. Blood 118: 1145-1153, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Clark JP,
    2. Cooper CS
    : ETS gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 6: 429-439, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hart AH,
    2. Corrick CM,
    3. Tymms MJ,
    4. Hertzog PJ,
    5. Kola I
    : Human ERG is a proto-oncogene with mitogenic and transforming activity. Oncogene 10: 1423-1430, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hermans KG,
    2. van MR,
    3. van DH,
    4. Jenster G,
    5. van Weerden WM,
    6. Trapman J
    : TMPRSS2:ERG fusion by translocation or interstitial deletion is highly relevant in androgen-dependent prostate cancer, but is bypassed in late-stage androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer. Cancer Res 66: 10658-10663, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Salagierski M,
    2. Schalken JA
    : Molecular diagnosis of prostate cancer: PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion. J Urol 187: 795-801, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Park K,
    2. Tomlins SA,
    3. Mudaliar KM,
    4. Chiu YL,
    5. Esgueva R,
    6. Mehra R,
    7. Suleman K,
    8. Varambally S,
    9. Brenner JC,
    10. MacDonald T,
    11. Srivastava A,
    12. Tewari AK,
    13. Sathyanarayana U,
    14. Nagy D,
    15. Pestano G,
    16. Kunju LP,
    17. Demichelis F,
    18. Chinnaiyan AM,
    19. Rubin MA
    : Antibody-based detection of ERG rearrangement-positive prostate cancer. Neoplasia 12: 590-598, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Tomlins SA,
    2. Aubin SM,
    3. Siddiqui J,
    4. Lonigro RJ,
    5. Sefton-Miller L,
    6. Miick S,
    7. Williamsen S,
    8. Hodge P,
    9. Meinke J,
    10. Blase A,
    11. Penabella Y,
    12. Day JR,
    13. Varambally R,
    14. Han B,
    15. Wood D,
    16. Wang L,
    17. Sanda MG,
    18. Rubin MA,
    19. Rhodes DR,
    20. Hollenbeck B,
    21. Sakamoto K,
    22. Silberstein JL,
    23. Fradet Y,
    24. Amberson JB,
    25. Meyers S,
    26. Palanisamy N,
    27. Rittenhouse H,
    28. Wei JT,
    29. Groskopf J,
    30. Chinnaiyan AM
    : Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript stratifies prostate cancer risk in men with elevated serum PSA. Sci Transl Med 3: 94ra72, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Danila DC,
    2. Anand A,
    3. Sung CC,
    4. Heller G,
    5. Leversha MA,
    6. Cao L,
    7. Lilja H,
    8. Molina A,
    9. Sawyers CL,
    10. Fleisher M,
    11. Scher HI
    : TMPRSS2-ERG status in circulating tumor cells as a predictive biomarker of sensitivity in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Eur Urol 60: 897-904, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Gopalan A,
    2. Leversha MA,
    3. Satagopan JM,
    4. Zhou Q,
    5. Al-Ahmadie HA,
    6. Fine SW,
    7. Eastham JA,
    8. Scardino PT,
    9. Scher HI,
    10. Tickoo SK,
    11. Reuter VE,
    12. Gerald WL
    : TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion is not associated with outcome in patients treated by prostatectomy. Cancer Res 69: 1400-1406, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Barwick BG,
    2. Abramovitz M,
    3. Kodani M,
    4. Moreno CS,
    5. Nam R,
    6. Tang W,
    7. Bouzyk M,
    8. Seth A,
    9. Leyland-Jones B
    : Prostate cancer genes associated with TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion and prognostic of biochemical recurrence in multiple cohorts. Br J Cancer 102: 570-576, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Sander EE,
    2. ten Klooster JP,
    3. van DS,
    4. van der Kammen RA,
    5. Collard JG
    : Rac downregulates Rho activity: Reciprocal balance between both GTPases determines cellular morphology and migratory behavior. J Cell Biol 147: 1009-1022, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Nam RK,
    2. Sugar L,
    3. Yang W,
    4. Srivastava S,
    5. Klotz LH,
    6. Yang LY,
    7. Stanimirovic A,
    8. Encioiu E,
    9. Neill M,
    10. Loblaw DA,
    11. Trachtenberg J,
    12. Narod SA,
    13. Seth A
    : Expression of the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene predicts cancer recurrence after surgery for localised prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 97: 1690-1695, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Bradford JR,
    2. Hey Y,
    3. Yates T,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Pepper SD,
    6. Miller CJ
    : A comparison of massively parallel nucleotide sequencing with oligonucleotide microarrays for global transcription profiling. BMC Genomics 11: 282, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Klezovitch O,
    2. Risk M,
    3. Coleman I,
    4. Lucas JM,
    5. Null M,
    6. True LD,
    7. Nelson PS,
    8. Vasioukhin V
    : A causal role for ERG in neoplastic transformation of prostate epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 2105-2110, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Mani RS,
    2. Iyer MK,
    3. Cao Q,
    4. Brenner JC,
    5. Wang L,
    6. Ghosh A,
    7. Cao X,
    8. Lonigro RJ,
    9. Tomlins SA,
    10. Varambally S,
    11. Chinnaiyan AM
    : TMPRSS2-ERG-mediated feed-forward regulation of wild-type ERG in human prostate cancers. Cancer Res 71: 5387-5392, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Veveris-Lowe TL,
    2. Lawrence MG,
    3. Collard RL,
    4. Bui L,
    5. Herington AC,
    6. Nicol DL,
    7. Clements JA
    : Kallikrein 4 (hK4) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are associated with the loss of E-cadherin and an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like effect in prostate cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer 12: 631-643, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Kharaishvili G,
    2. Simkova D,
    3. Makharoblidze E,
    4. Trtkova K,
    5. Kolar Z,
    6. Bouchal J
    : Wnt signaling in prostate development and carcinogenesis. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 155: 11-18, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Ricks-Santi L,
    2. Mason T,
    3. Apprey V,
    4. Ahaghotu C,
    5. McLauchlin A,
    6. Josey D,
    7. Bonney G,
    8. Dunston GM
    : p53 Pro72Arg polymorphism and prostate cancer in men of African descent. Prostate 70: 1739-1745, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Gasi D,
    2. van der Korput HA,
    3. Douben HC,
    4. de KA,
    5. de Ridder CM,
    6. van Weerden WM,
    7. Trapman J
    : Overexpression of full-length ETV1 transcripts in clinical prostate cancer due to gene translocation. PLoS One 6: e16332, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Robinson L,
    2. Panayiotakis A,
    3. Papas TS,
    4. Kola I,
    5. Seth A
    : ETS target genes: Identification of EGR1 as a target by RNA differential display and whole genome PCR techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 7170-7175, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Ma J,
    2. Ren Z,
    3. Ma Y,
    4. Xu L,
    5. Zhao Y,
    6. Zheng C,
    7. Fang Y,
    8. Xue T,
    9. Sun B,
    10. Xiao W
    : Targeted knockdown of EGR-1 inhibits IL-8 production and IL-8-mediated invasion of prostate cancer cells through suppressing EGR-1/NF-kappaB synergy. J Biol Chem 284: 34600-34606, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Salah Z,
    2. Maoz M,
    3. Pizov G,
    4. Bar-Shavit R
    : Transcriptional regulation of human protease-activated receptor 1: A role for the early growth response-1 protein in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 67: 9835-9843, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Zheng C,
    2. Ren Z,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Zhang W,
    5. Kalvakolanu DV,
    6. Tian Z,
    7. Xiao W
    : E2F1 induces tumor cell survival via nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent induction of EGR1 transcription in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 69: 2324-2331, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Vetter M,
    2. Blumenthal SG,
    3. Lindemann RK,
    4. Manns J,
    5. Wesselborg S,
    6. Thomssen C,
    7. Dittmer J
    : Ets1 is an effector of protein kinase Cα in cancer cells. Oncogene 24: 650-661, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Cho HJ,
    2. Baek KE,
    3. Yoo J
    : RhoGDI2 as a therapeutic target in cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 14: 67-75, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Xu SG,
    2. Yan PJ,
    3. Shao ZM
    : Differential proteomic analysis of a highly metastatic variant of human breast cancer cells using two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136: 1545-1556, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Said N,
    2. Sanchez-Carbayo M,
    3. Smith SC,
    4. Theodorescu D
    : RhoGDI2 suppresses lung metastasis in mice by reducing tumor versican expression and macrophage infiltration. J Clin Invest 122: 1503-1518, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Lin R,
    2. Maeda S,
    3. Liu C,
    4. Karin M,
    5. Edgington TS
    : A large noncoding RNA is a marker for murine hepatocellular carcinomas and a spectrum of human carcinomas. Oncogene 26: 851-858, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Xu Q,
    2. Reed JC
    : Bax inhibitor-1, a mammalian apoptosis suppressor identified by functional screening in yeast. Mol Cell 1: 337-346, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Grzmil M,
    2. Thelen P,
    3. Hemmerlein B,
    4. Schweyer S,
    5. Voigt S,
    6. Mury D,
    7. Burfeind P
    : BAX inhibitor-1 is overexpressed in prostate cancer and its specific down-regulation by RNA interference leads to cell death in human prostate carcinoma cells. Am J Pathol 163: 543-552, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Sinha AA,
    2. Quast BJ,
    3. Wilson MJ,
    4. Fernandes ET,
    5. Reddy PK,
    6. Ewing SL,
    7. Sloane BF,
    8. Gleason DF
    : Ratio of cathepsin B to stefin A identifies heterogeneity within Gleason histologic scores for human prostate cancer. Prostate 48: 274-284, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Ouyang X,
    2. Jessen WJ,
    3. Al-Ahmadie H,
    4. Serio AM,
    5. Lin Y,
    6. Shih WJ,
    7. Reuter VE,
    8. Scardino PT,
    9. Shen MM,
    10. Aronow BJ,
    11. Vickers AJ,
    12. Gerald WL,
    13. Abate-Shen C
    : Activator protein-1 transcription factors are associated with progression and recurrence of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 68: 2132-2144, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Rubin MA,
    2. Zhou M,
    3. Dhanasekaran SM,
    4. Varambally S,
    5. Barrette TR,
    6. Sanda MG,
    7. Pienta KJ,
    8. Ghosh D,
    9. Chinnaiyan AM
    : α-Methylacyl coenzyme A racemase as a tissue biomarker for prostate cancer. JAMA 287: 1662-1670, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Jiang Z,
    2. Li C,
    3. Fischer A,
    4. Dresser K,
    5. Woda BA
    : Using an AMACR (P504S)/34betaE12/p63 cocktail for the detection of small focal prostate carcinoma in needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 123: 231-236, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Kumaresan K,
    2. Kakkar N,
    3. Verma A,
    4. Mandal AK,
    5. Singh SK,
    6. Joshi K
    : Diagnostic utility of α-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) and HMWCK in morphologically difficult prostate cancer. Diagn Pathol 5: 83, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Makarov DV,
    2. Loeb S,
    3. Getzenberg RH,
    4. Partin AW
    : Biomarkers for prostate cancer. Annu Rev Med 60: 139-151, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Han J,
    2. Jogie-Brahim S,
    3. Harada A,
    4. Oh Y
    : Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 suppresses tumor growth via activation of caspase-dependent apoptosis and cross-talk with NF-κB signaling. Cancer Lett 307: 200-210, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Logan CY,
    2. Nusse R
    : The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20: 781-810, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Kanehisa M,
    2. Goto S
    : KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 27-30, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Kanehisa M,
    2. Goto S,
    3. Sato Y,
    4. Furumichi M,
    5. Tanabe M
    : KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D109-D114, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Yoeli-Lerner M,
    2. Chin YR,
    3. Hansen CK,
    4. Toker A
    : AKT/protein kinase B and glycogen synthase kinase-3β signaling pathway regulates cell migration through the NFAT1 transcription factor. Mol Cancer Res 7: 425-432, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Knudsen KE,
    2. Kelly WK
    : Outsmarting androgen receptor: Creative approaches for targeting aberrant androgen signaling in advanced prostate cancer. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 6: 483-493, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Truica CI,
    2. Byers S,
    3. Gelmann EP
    : β-catenin affects androgen receptor transcriptional activity and ligand specificity. Cancer Res 60: 4709-4713, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Jung H,
    2. Kim HJ,
    3. Lee SK,
    4. Kim R,
    5. Kopachik W,
    6. Han JK,
    7. Jho EH
    : Negative feedback regulation of Wnt signaling by Gβγ-mediated reduction of Dishevelled. Exp Mol Med 41: 695-706, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Salsano E,
    2. Paterra R,
    3. Figus M,
    4. Menghi F,
    5. Maderna E,
    6. Pollo B,
    7. Solero CL,
    8. Massimi L,
    9. Finocchiaro G
    : Expression profile of frizzled receptors in human medulloblastomas. J Neurooncol 106: 271-280, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Meek DW
    : Tumour suppression by p53: A role for the DNA damage response? Nat Rev Cancer 9: 714-723, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Chan QK,
    2. Lam HM,
    3. Ng CF,
    4. Lee AY,
    5. Chan ES,
    6. Ng HK,
    7. Ho SM,
    8. Lau KM
    : Activation of GPR30 inhibits the growth of prostate cancer cells through sustained activation of ERK1/2, c-JUN/c-FOS-dependent up-regulation of p21, and induction of G2 cell-cycle arrest. Cell Death Differ 17: 1511-1523, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Yoshiko S,
    2. Hoyoku N
    : Fucoxanthin, a natural carotenoid, induces G1 arrest and GADD45 gene expression in human cancer cells. In Vivo 21: 305-309, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Cheng L,
    2. Pan CX,
    3. Zhang JT,
    4. Zhang S,
    5. Kinch MS,
    6. Li L,
    7. Baldridge LA,
    8. Wade C,
    9. Hu Z,
    10. Koch MO,
    11. Ulbright TM,
    12. Eble JN
    : Loss of 14-3-3σ in prostate cancer and its precursors. Clin Cancer Res 10: 3064-3068, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Ganapathy M,
    2. Ghosh R,
    3. Jianping X,
    4. Zhang X,
    5. Bedolla R,
    6. Schoolfield J,
    7. Yeh IT,
    8. Troyer DA,
    9. Olumi AF,
    10. Kumar AP
    : Involvement of FLIP in 2-methoxyestradiol-induced tumor regression in transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate model. Clin Cancer Res 15: 1601-1611, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Kawabata R,
    2. Oie S,
    3. Takahashi M,
    4. Kanayama H,
    5. Oka T,
    6. Itoh K
    : Up-regulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) leads to the potent anti-proliferative effect of androgen deprivation therapy combined with 5-FU in human prostate cancer cell lines. Int J Oncol 38: 1489-1500, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Ingermann AR,
    2. Yang YF,
    3. Han J,
    4. Mikami A,
    5. Garza AE,
    6. Mohanraj L,
    7. Fan L,
    8. Idowu M,
    9. Ware JL,
    10. Kim HS,
    11. Lee DY,
    12. Oh Y
    : Identification of a novel cell death receptor mediating IGFBP-3-induced antitumor effects in breast and prostate cancer. J Biol Chem 285: 30233-30246, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Adzhubei IA,
    2. Schmidt S,
    3. Peshkin L,
    4. Ramensky VE,
    5. Gerasimova A,
    6. Bork P,
    7. Kondrashov AS,
    8. Sunyaev SR
    : A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7: 248-249, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Dumont P,
    2. Leu JI,
    3. Della Pietra AC,
    4. George DL,
    5. Murphy M
    : The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential. Nat Genet 33: 357-365, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Thomas M,
    2. Kalita A,
    3. Labrecque S,
    4. Pim D,
    5. Banks L,
    6. Matlashewski G
    : Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically. Mol Cell Biol 19: 1092-1100, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 32, Issue 9
September 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Whole-transcriptome Analysis Reveals Established and Novel Associations with TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion in Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Whole-transcriptome Analysis Reveals Established and Novel Associations with TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion in Prostate Cancer
ANTHONY CHOW, YUTAKA AMEMIYA, LINDA SUGAR, ROBERT NAM, ARUN SETH
Anticancer Research Sep 2012, 32 (9) 3629-3641;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Whole-transcriptome Analysis Reveals Established and Novel Associations with TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion in Prostate Cancer
ANTHONY CHOW, YUTAKA AMEMIYA, LINDA SUGAR, ROBERT NAM, ARUN SETH
Anticancer Research Sep 2012, 32 (9) 3629-3641;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Targeting the WNT Signaling Pathway in Cancer Therapeutics
  • ERG Is a Critical Regulator of Wnt/LEF1 Signaling in Prostate Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Invasive-Front P21 Expression Is Associated With Tumor Aggressiveness in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Isolation and Biological Evaluation of Breast Cancer Side Population Cells Using DyeCycle Violet
  • Serum Extracellular Vesicles Double-positive for CD9 and CD147 or for CD9 and CD63 Decrease After Surgical Resection in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Potential Biomarkers of Residual Tumor
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire