Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research Article

Cytotoxicity and Type of Cell Death Induced by Local Anesthetics in Human Oral Normal and Tumor cells

KATSUE KOBAYASHI, SEIKA OHNO, SHIGENORI UCHIDA, OSAMU AMANO, HIROSHI SAKAGAMI and HIROSHI NAGASAKA
Anticancer Research July 2012, 32 (7) 2925-2933;
KATSUE KOBAYASHI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SEIKA OHNO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIGENORI UCHIDA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
OSAMU AMANO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI SAKAGAMI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI NAGASAKA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hnagasak{at}dent.meikai.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Local anesthetics are often administered to tumors and surrounding tissues during the surgery of the head and neck area, however their effects on oral tissues is not well understood. In the present study, the cytotoxicity of a total of seven local anesthetics towards oral tumor and normal cells was compared. Materials and Methods: Tumor-specificity index was determined by the ratio of the mean 50% cytotoxic concentration against normal cells to that for tumor cells. Apoptosis induction was monitored by internucleosomal DNA fragmentation and caspase-3, -8, and - 9 activation. Fine cell structure was observed under transmission electron microscopy. Results: All local anesthetics showed slightly higher cytotoxicity towards oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines than towards normal oral cells. Dibucaine, with a log p-value of approximately 3, was the most cytotoxic, followed by tetracaine, bupivacaine or ethylaminobenzoate, whereas lidocaine, procaine and mepivacain were much less cytotoxic. When the tumor-specificity was evaluated between OSCC and human skin keratinocytes, the index was 6.6. Dibucaine did not induce apoptosis of OSCC cells. On the other hand, dibucaine did induce mitochondrial injury and swelling, formation of secondary lysosomes, and at high concentrations, rupture of the cell membrane. Autophagy inhibitors did not reduce the cytotoxicity of dibucaine. Conclusion: Necrosis may be involved in the induction of antitumor activity by dibucaine.

  • Local anaesthetics
  • oral squamous cell carcinoma
  • type of cell death
  • necrosis
  • mitochondrial injury
  • dibucaine

Local anesthetics irreversibly block Na+ channels from the inside of the cell surface membrane, and are used for spinal and epidural anesthesia and nerve blocking (1). Local anesthetics exert their action not only against neurons but also against surrounding tissues, and damage the muscle and other tissues (2, 3). Topical application of local anesthetics has been reported to produce good pain control in patients with head and neck tumors (4), to reverse surgical stress-induced inhibition of natural killer (NK) cell activity, and to inhibit the metastasis and relapse of tumors (5, 6). However, no reliable evidence has been obtained, possibly due to the limited information about the mechanism of antitumor action of local anesthetics (7).

Local anesthetics exhibited in vitro cytotoxicity towards various cultured cells (8-12). Apoptosis-inducing activity has been suggested to be involved in the neurotoxicity of local anesthetics (13-18). Not only general anesthesia but also local anesthesia is administered to tumors and surrounding tissues during surgery of the head and neck area. However, the effect of local anesthetics on oral cells is not well understood, possibly due to the scarcity of tissue injury by local anesthetics. Based on this, here we investigated the cytotoxicity of seven local anesthetics (Figure 1) towards human normal oral cells, oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), glioblastoma cell lines, and skin keratinocytes. We also investigated the type of cell death induced by the most cytotoxic local anesthetic dibucaine, in OSCC.

Materials and Methods

Materials. The following chemicals and reagents were obtained from the indicated companies: RPMI1640, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA); fetal bovine serum, (FBS), 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), mepivacaine, bupivacaine (Sigma Chem. Ind., St. Louis, MO, USA); dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), lidocaine, dibucaine, procaine, tetracaine, ethyl-o-aminobenzoate (Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan).

Cell culture. HL-60 (RIKEN, Tsukuba, Japan) cells were cultured at 37°C in RPMI 1640, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. Human OSCC cell lines (HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4, NA, Ca9-22) and human glioblastoma cell lines (T98G, U87MG) were obtained from Professor Nagumo, Showa University, Japan. These adherent cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. Normal human oral cells, gingival fibroblast (HGF), pulp cells (HPC) and periodontal ligament fibroblast (HPLF), were prepared from periodontal tissues, according to the guideline of the Intramural Ethic Committee (no. A0808), after obtaining informed consent from the 12-years-old patient at the Meikai University Hospital. Since normal oral cells have a limited lifespan of 43-47 population doubling levels (PDL) (19), they were used at 8-15 PDL. Human skin keratinocytes (HEKa, HEKn) (purchased from KURABO, Osaka, Japan) were cultured in HuMedia-KG2, supplemented with insulin, human recombinant EGF (hEGF), hydrocortisone, gentamicin, amphotericin B, bovine pituitary gland extract (BPE).

Assay for cytotoxic activity. All of the cells were inoculated at 5×103 cells/well in 96-microwell plates (Becton Dickinson Labware, NJ, USA), unless otherwise stated. After 48 h, the medium was removed by suction with an aspirator, and replaced with 0.1 ml of fresh medium containing different concentrations of the test compounds. The cells were incubated for another 48 h, and the relative viable cell number was then determined by the MTT method (20). In brief, the cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline without Ca2+ and Mg2+ [PBS(−)], and replaced with fresh culture medium containing 0.2 mg/ml MTT. After incubation for 4 h, the cells were lysed with 0.1 mL of DMSO, and the absorbance of the cell lysate was determined at 540 nm, using a microplate reader (Biochromatic Labsystem, Helsinki, Finland). From the dose-response curve, the 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) was determined. Tumor-specificity (TS) was determined by the ratio of the mean CC50 for three normal cells to that for tumor cell lines.

Assay for DNA fragmentation. Cells were lysed by lysate buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% (w/v) sodium N-lauroylsalcosinate]. The lysate was incubated with 0.4 mg/ml RNase A and 0.8 mg/ml proteinase K for 1-2 h at 50°C, and then mixed with 50 μl NaI solution [7.6 M NaI, 20 mM EDTA-2Na, 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0], and 100 μl of ethanol. After centrifugation for 20 min at 20,000 ×g, the precipitate was washed with 1 ml of 70% ethanol and dissolved in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 3-5). The sample (10-20 μl) was then applied to 2% agarose gel electrophoresis in TBE buffer (89 mM Tris-HCl, 89 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) (20). A DNA molecular marker (TAKARA, Japan) and the DNA from apoptotic HL-60 cells induced by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation were used for calibration. The DNA fragmentation pattern was examined in photographs taken under UV illumination.

Assay for caspase activation. Cells were washed with PBS(−) and lysed in lysis solution (MBL, Nagoya, Japan). After resting of cells for 10 min on ice and centrifugation for 5 min at 10,000 ×g, the supernatant was collected. The lysate (50 μl, equivalent to 200 μg protein) was mixed with 50 μl 2× reaction buffer (MBL) containing substrates for caspase-3 (DEVD-pNA (p-nitroanilide)), caspase-8 (IETD-pNA) or caspase-9 (LEHD-pNA). After incubation for 4 h at 37°C, the absorbance of the liberated chromophore pNA was measured at 405 nm by a microplate reader (20).

Electron microscopy. Dibucaine-treated cells were harvested by trypsin-EDTA and were pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 ×g for 5 min. The cells were fixed for 1 h with 2% gultaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) at 4°C, dehydrated and then embedded in Araldite 502 (CIBAGEIGY Swiss; NISSHIN EN Co., Ltd., Tokyo Japan). Fine sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and were then observed under a JEM-1210 transmission electron microscope (JEOL), at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV (21).

Results

Tumor-specificity of local anesthetics. Dibucaine dose-dependently reduced the viability of all human normal and tumor cells investigated (Figure 1). The minimum lethal concentration of dibucaine against skin keratinocytes (HEKa, HEKn) (500 μM) (Figure 1F) was approximately two-fold that toward human normal oral cells (HGF, HPC, HPLF) (Figure 1E). Cell killing activity of dibucaine toward human OSCC cell lines (HSC-2, -3, -4, NA, Ca9-22) was observed at concentrations above 125 μM (Figure 1A, B). Dibucaine at 125 μM was lethal toward both glioblastoma (T98G, U87MG) (Figure 1C) and promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cells (Figure 1D).

Similar experiments were performed with another six local anesthetics to yield the CC50 values (listed in Table I). Dibucaine exhibited the highest cytotoxicity toward OSCC cell lines (mean CC50=34.8 μM), followed by tetracaine (199.5 μM), bupivacaine (429.2 μM), ethylaminobenzoate (519.4 μM), lidocaine (676.6 μM), procaine (725.8 μM) and mepivacaine (820.8 μM).

Glioblastoma cells (T98G, U87MG) were slightly resistant to the cytotoxicity of local anesthetics as compared with OSCC cell lines. However, the relative cytotoxicity of these local anesthetics was in the same order: dibucaine (mean CC50=109.7 μM) > tetracaine (201.5 μM) > bupivacaine (534.5 μM) > ethylaminobenzoate (559.5 μM) > lidocaine (735.5 μM), procaine (807 μM) > mepivacaine (950 μM).

Normal cells were the least affected. Dibucaine (mean CC50=78.0 μM) again was the most cytotoxic, followed by tetracaine (216.0 μM) > ethylaminobenzoate (673.7 μM) > bupivacaine (753 μM) > lidocaine (811.6 μM) > procaine (>963.0 μM) and mepivacaine (>988.0 μM).

Skin keratinocytes (HEKa, HEKn) were highly resistant to dibucaine (CC50=229.7 μM) (Table I). When the cytotoxicity of dibucaine toward five OSCC cells lines and human keratinocytes (both epithelial lineages) was compared, dibucaine had a much higher tumor-specificity (TS=6.6).

Amido- and ester-type local anesthetics had comparable cytotoxicity toward the cells investigated (Table I).

Type of cell death induced by dibucaine in OSCC. We first determined the minimum exposure time required to induce irreversible cell death using HSC-2 and HSC-4 cells (Figure 2). The cytoxocity of dibucaine towards both of these cell lines was increased with increasing exposure time up to 24 h. Further exposure did not apparently enhance the cytotoxicity of dibucaine (Figure 2). Based on these data, HSC-2 and HSC-4 cells were treated for 24 h with different concentrations of dibucaine in the subsequent experiments. Since dibucaine had cytotoxic, but not cytostatic effects on the cells (Figure 1), we investigated which type of cell death dibucaine induced in OSCC cells. Dibucaine induced internucleosomal DNA fragmentation in HL-60 cells (used as positive control due to its high sensitivity to various apoptosis inducers), but not in OSCC cell lines (HSC-2, HSC-4) (Figure 3A). Similarly, dibucaine activated caspase-3 in HL-60 cells, but not in OSCC cell lines (Figure 3B). These data suggest that dibucain does not induce apoptosis in OSCC cells.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Cytotoxic activity of dibucaine against human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells (A, B), glioblastoma cells (C), leukemia cells (D), and human normal oral cells (E), and human keratinocytes (F), treated for 48 h without (control), or with the indicated concentrations of dibucaine. The viable cell number was then determined by the MTT method, and expressed as control. A percentage of each value represents the mean±S.D. from 4 or 5 independent experiments. *p<0.01 †p<0.01 ‡p<0.01 compared to control (no reagent) of each cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Cytotoxic activity of local anesthetics against human normal and tumor cells.

Next, the possibility of autophagy induction was tested using autophagy inhibitors. Pretreatment of OSCC cells with either 3-methyladenine (Figure 4A) or bafilomycin A1 (Figure 4B) failed to inhibit the cell death of OSCC, induced by dibucaine. These data suggest that autophagy is not involved in dubucaine-induced cell death of OSCC cell lines.

To assess the possibility of induction of other types of cell death, the fine cell structure after dibucaine treatment was observed under transmission electron microscopy (Figure 5). When HSC-2 and HSC-4 cells were treated for 24 h with different concentrations of dibucaine, cellular swelling accompanied by dysfunction of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum and formation of secondary lysosome were observed already at the half CC50 concentration (HSC-2: 19.8 μM, HSC-4:14.4 μM) (Figure 5). Higher concentrations of dibucaine (>CC50) induced disruption of the plasma membrane and leakage of cellular substrates, and rapid cell breakage. These data indicate the possible occurrence of necrosis.

Discussion

Local anesthetics have been used as spinal anesthesia, dermenchysis and topical anesthesia to relieve pain in patients with cancer. The concentration of dibucaine used clinically as spinal anesthesia ranges from 0.3 to 0.75% (7.9 to 19.7 mM). The exact tissue concentration of local anesthetics used in pain relief is estimated to be 400 μM, approximately 1/100 of the initially administered concentration (8). However, dibucaine has been reported to be destructive towards the myelinated nerve Aβ fiber [at 0.003% (69 μM)] and unmyelinated nerve C fiber at 0.03% (690 μM) (22), suggesting a narrow safety margin. Dibucaine has been reported to show neurotoxicity even at as low as 20 μM (23). These data indicate that dibucaine can induce neurotoxicity at a concentration lower than its clinically used concentration (22, 23). Due to neurotoxicity of dibucaine as spinal anesthesia (24, 25), the opportunities for its clinical use have become fewer as compared with bupivacaine or ropivacaine. However, despite the reporting of many cases of neurotoxicity of dibucaine, including cauda equine syndrome, and its infiltration into surrounding tissues, there are no reports of this agent in inducing necrosis.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Effect of exposure time of dibucaine on the induction of cytotoxicity in HSC-2 and HSC-4 cells. Cells were treated for the indicated times without (control) or with the indicated concentrations of dibucaine. The viable cell number was then determined by the MTT method, and expressed as a percentage of the control. Each value represents the mean±S.D from 3 independent experiments.

The present study demonstrated that both amido- and ester-type local anesthetics have comparable cytotoxicity towards both normal oral and tumor cells, however, the tumor cell lines were slightly more sensitive to these anesthetics. Dibucaine (15-100 μM) had the highest cytotoxicity and tumor-specificity among the seven anesthetics investigated. When the cytotoxicity of dibucaine against OSCC and skin keratinocytes was compared, tumor specificity index was 6.6. Dibucaine did not induce apoptosis (characterized by DNA fragmentation and caspase activation). In addition, dibucaine-induced cell death was not inhibited by autophagy inhibitors. The electron microscopic observation demonstrated the swelling of organelles. These data suggest the possible induction of necrosis, especially at higher concentrations of dibucaine. The dibucaine used at concentrations below 15 μM was not cytotoxic.

Higher concentrations (100 μM, 150 μM) of dibucaine have been reported to induce apoptosis of neuroblastoma and leukemia cell lines (9, 10). We also found that higher concentrations (30-125 μM) of dibucaine induced apoptosis of HL-60 cells, used as control cells that are easily committed to apoptosis. The present study demonstrated, to our knowledge for the first time that dibucaine failed to induce apoptosis of human OSCC cell lines, suggesting that the type of cell death may depend on the target cells. This possibility is supported by a previous report that local anesthetics such as lidocaine, bupivacaine and tetracaine induced apoptosis of renal proximal tubule cells, but not in trachea smooth muscle cells (10). Lidocaine at 400 and 4000 μM was cytotostatic and cytotoxic, respectively, towards tongue cancer cell lines (8). Since these tongue cancer cell line expresses a higher tyrosine kinase activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the cytotoxic action of local anesthetics may be due to its inhibition of tyrosine kinase activity (26). Kamiya et al. have reported that lidocaine induced apoptosis at relatively low millimolar concentrations (12 mM), but necrosis at much higher millimolar concentrations (above 15 mM) in human histiocytic lymphoma cells (16). Our findings are in agreement with these data.

It has been reported that many drugs, toxicants and radiation have biphasic effects, that is a growth-stimulatory effect (hormesis) at lower concentration and a cytotoxic effect at higher concentration (27). We found that when normal cells (HGF, HPC, HPLF) were incubated for 24 h with low concentrations (0.4-6.3 μM) of dibucaine, their growth was stimulated by up to 238% compared to that of untreated cells; such a hormetic effect has not been observed in any of the OSCC cell lines (data not shown). The biological significance of this finding remains to be investigated.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Effect of dibucaine on the DNA fragmentation and caspase activity. HL-60, HSC-2 and HSC-4 cells were incubated for 24 h with 0 (control), CC50, CC50×2 or CC50×4 of dibucaine. (A): DNA was then extracted and subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. UV; DNA from apoptotic HL-60 cells induced by UV-irradiation. (B): Caspase activity (expressed as 405 nm of each cleaved product) was determined. Apoptotic HL-60 cells induced by UV were used as positive control. *p<0.01 compared to control of each cell line.

Local anesthetics stimulated the membrane fluidity and permeability of artificial membranes (8, 28-30) and this stimulation may be involved in apoptosis induction in a neuroblastoma cell and HL-60 cells by dibucaine (9, 10). These findings were confirmed by the report that local anesthetics, including dibucaine, changed the membrane fluidity of hepatoma cells (31).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Effect of autophagy inhibitors (3-methyladenine and bafilomycin A1) on dibucaine-induced HSC-2 and HSC-4 cytotoxicity. HSC-2 or HSC-4 cells were pre-treated for 1 h with the indicated concentration of 3-methyladenine (A), or bafilomycin A1 (B) and then incubated for 24 h with 0 (control), or with the indicated concentrations of dibucaine. The viable cell number was then determined by the MTT method, and expressed as a percentage of the control. Each value represents the mean±S.D. from triplicate determinations.

It has been reported that membrane permeability and cytotoxicity became maximum when the lipophilicity, as determined by the octanol-water partition coefficient (log p), approached 3 (32, 33). In accordance with this hypothesis, we found that dibucaine (log p=3.03) had the highest cytotoxicity against OSCC, followed by tetracaine (log p=3.65) and, bupivacaine (log p=3.64). Procaine (log p=2.36), lidocaine (log p=2.36), mepivacaine (log p=2.04), ethyl aminobenzoate (log p=1.95) were much less cytotoxic (Table I). This suggests that the cytotoxicity of local anesthetics is indeed related to their membrane permeability. Kitagawa et al. has reported that local anesthetics directly damaged the model membranes composed of phospholipid (34).

Dibucaine has been frequently used for spinal and lumbar anesthesia. Moreover, dibucaine is also most commonly used for topical anesthesia (1). However, the use of dibucaine has been limited due to its neurotoxicity, despite its potent anesthetic potency. Furthermore, lidocaine, but not dibucaine, has been extensively used in dentistry due its the pharmacological merits. However, dibucaine has the most potent antitumor activity among the local anesthetics investigated and should thus be re-considered for its possible application in the surgery of head and neck cancer.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Change in the fine cell structure induced by dibucaine. HSC-2 and HSC-4 cells were treated for 24 h without (control), or with the indicated concentrations of dibucaine [0 (control), CC50×1/2, CC50 or CC50×2], and then processed for electron microscopy. Bar=1 μm.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Culture, Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (Nagasaka no:16591560).

  • Received May 21, 2012.
  • Revision received June 11, 2012.
  • Accepted June 11, 2012.
  • Copyright© 2012 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Miller RD
    1. Berde CB,
    2. Strichartz GR
    : Local anesthetics: Miller's Anesthesia, 7th edition. In: Miller RD (ed.). Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier pp. 913-939, 2010.
  2. ↵
    1. Galbes O,
    2. Bourret A,
    3. Gaulain KN
    : N-Acetylcysteine protects against bupivacaine-induced myotoxicity caused by oxidative and sarcoplasmic reticulum stress in human skeletal myotubes. Anesthesiology 113: 560-569, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Piper SL,
    2. Kim HT
    : Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine toxicity in human articular chondrocytes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90: 986-991, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. James C
    : Long-term consequences of anesthetic management. Anesthesiology 111: 1-4, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Wada H,
    2. Seki S,
    3. Takahashi T,
    4. Kawarabayashi N,
    5. Higuchi H,
    6. Habu Y,
    7. Sugahara S,
    8. Kazama T
    : Combined spinal and general anesthesia attenuates liver metastasis by preserving TH1/TH2 cytokine balance. Anesthesiology 106: 499-506, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ogawa K,
    2. Hirai M,
    3. Katsube T,
    4. Murayama M,
    5. Hamaguchi K,
    6. Shimakawa T,
    7. Naritake Y,
    8. Hosokawa T,
    9. Kajiwara T
    : Suppression of cellular immunity by surgical stress. Surgery 127: 329-336, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Nagasaka H,
    2. Ohno S,
    3. Kobayashi K,
    4. Sakagami H
    : Effect of anesthetics on malignant tumor cells (A review). Masui 58: 1216-1225, 2009 (in Japanese).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Sakaguchi M,
    2. Kuroda Y,
    3. Hirose M
    : The antiproliferative effect of lidocaine on human tongue cancer cells with inhibition of the activity of epidermal growth factor receptor. Anesth Analg 102: 1103-1107, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kim M,
    2. Lee YS,
    3. Mathews H,
    4. Wurster RD
    : Induction of apoptotic cell death in a neuroblastoma cell line by dibucaine. Exp cell Res 231: 235-241, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Arita K,
    2. Utsumi T,
    3. Kato A,
    4. Kanno T,
    5. Kobuchi H,
    6. Inoue B,
    7. Akiyama J,
    8. Utsumi K
    : Mechanism of dibucaine-induced apoptosis in promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60). Biochem Pharmcol 60: 905-915, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lee HT,
    2. Xu H,
    3. Siegel CD,
    4. Krichevsky IE
    : Local anesthetics induce human renal cell apoptosis. Am J Nephrol 23: 129-139, 2002.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Nakamura K,
    2. Kido H,
    3. Morimoto Y,
    4. Morimoto H,
    5. Kobayashi S,
    6. Morikawa M,
    7. Hanei T
    : Prilocaine induces apoptosis in osteoblastic cells. Can J Anesth 46: 476-482, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Ross BK,
    2. Coda B,
    3. Heath CH
    : Local anesthetic distribution in a spinal model: a possible mechanism of neurologic injury after continuous spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth 17: 69-77, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Arai T,
    2. Hoka S
    : Neurotoxicity of intrathecal local anesthetics. J Anesth 21: 540-541, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kishimoto T,
    2. Bollen AW,
    3. Drasner K
    : Comparative spinal neurotoxicity of prilocaine and lidocaine. Anesthesiology 97: 1250-1253, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kamiya Y,
    2. Ohta K,
    3. Kaneko Y
    : Lidocaine-induced apoptosis and necrosis in U937 cells depending on its dosage. Biomed Res 26: 231-239, 2009.
    OpenUrl
    1. Perez-Castro R,
    2. Patel S,
    3. Garavito-Aguilar ZV,
    4. Andrew R,
    5. Recio-Pinto E,
    6. Zhang J,
    7. Blanck TJJ,
    8. Xu F
    : Cytotoxicity of local anesthetics in human neuronal cells. Int Anesthesia Res So 108: 997-1007, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Boselli E,
    2. Duflo F,
    3. Debon R
    : The induction of apoptosis by local anesthetics. A comparison between lidocaine and ropivacaine. Anesth Analg 96: 755-756, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kantoh K,
    2. Ono M,
    3. Nakamura Y,
    4. Nakamura Y,
    5. Hashimoto K,
    6. Sakagami H,
    7. Wakabayashi H
    : Hormetic and anti-radiation effects of tropolone-related compounds. In Vivo 24: 843-851, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Otsuki S,
    2. Sugiyama K,
    3. Amano O,
    4. Yasui T,
    5. Sakagami H
    : Negative regulation of NaF-induced apoptosis by Bad-CAII complex. Toxicology 287: 131-136, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Ariyoshi-Kishino K,
    2. Hashimoto, K,
    3. Amano O,
    4. Kochi M,
    5. Sakagami H
    : Tumor-specific cytotoxicity and type of cell death induced by benzaldehyde. Anticancer Res 30: 5069-5076, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Ogawa S,
    2. Mikuni E,
    3. Nakamura T,
    4. Noda K,
    5. Ito S
    : Neurotoxicity of dibucaine on the isolated rabbit cervical vagus nerve. Masui 47: 439-446, 1998 (in Japanese).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kasaba T,
    2. Nonizuka S,
    3. Takasaki M
    : Procaine and mepivacaine have less toxicity in vitro than other clinically used local anesthetics. Anesth Analg 97: 85-90, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Akioka K,
    2. Torigoe K,
    3. Maruta H,
    4. Shimizu N,
    5. Kobayashi Y,
    6. Kaneko Y,
    7. Shiratori R
    : A case of cauda equina syndrome following spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric dibucaine. J Anesth 15: 106-107, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Ifuku Y,
    2. Iwagaki T,
    3. Irie J,
    4. Mekata K,
    5. Hirahara S,
    6. Uratsuji Y
    : Cauda equina syndrome following intrathecal dibucaine. Masui 53: 396-398, 2004 (In Japanese).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hirata M,
    2. Sakaguchi M,
    3. Mochida C,
    4. Sotozono C,
    5. Kageyama K,
    6. Kuroda Y
    : Lidocaine inhibits tyrosine kinase activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor and suppresses proliferation of corneal epithelial cells. Anesthesiology 100: 1206-1210, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Calabrese EJ
    ; Paradigm lost, paradigm found: The re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose-response model in the toxicological sciences. Environ Pollut 138: 379-412, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Rivoltini L,
    2. Gambacorti-Passerini C,
    3. Squadrelii-Saraceno, liarÃaGrosso M,
    4. Cant G,
    5. Molinari R,
    6. Orazi A,
    7. Parmiani G
    : In vivo interleukin 2-induced activation of lymphokine-activated killer cells and tumor cytotoxic T-cells in cervical lymph nodes of patients with head and neck tumors. Cancer Res 50: 5551-5557, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Werdehausen RB,
    2. Essmann F,
    3. Schulze-Osthoff K,
    4. Walczak H,
    5. Lipfert P,
    6. Stevens M
    : Lidocaine induces apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway independently of death receptor signaling. Anesthesiology 107: 136-143, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Johnson ME,
    2. Uhl CB,
    3. Spittler KH
    : Mitochondrial injury and caspase activation by the local anesthetic lidocaine. Anesthesiology 101: 1184-1194, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Edinger A L,
    2. Thompson C B
    : Death by design: apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16: 663-669, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Fujisawa S,
    2. Atsushi T,
    3. Kadoma Y,
    4. Sakagami H
    : Antioxidant and prooxidant action of eugenol-related compounds and their cytotoxicity. Forum “Phenolic compounds: free mechanisms of toxicity, catalysis, and protection”. Toxicology 177: 39-54, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Ishihara M,
    2. Yokote Y,
    3. Sakagami H
    : Quantitative structure-cytotoxicity relationship analysis of coumarin and its derivatives by semiempirical molecular-orbital method. Anticancer Res 26: 2883-2886 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Kitagawa N,
    2. Oda M,
    3. Totoki T
    : Possible mechanism of irreversible nerve injury caused by local anesthetics: detergent properties of local anesthetics and membrane disruption. Anesthesiology 100: 962-967, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 32, Issue 7
July 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cytotoxicity and Type of Cell Death Induced by Local Anesthetics in Human Oral Normal and Tumor cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Cytotoxicity and Type of Cell Death Induced by Local Anesthetics in Human Oral Normal and Tumor cells
KATSUE KOBAYASHI, SEIKA OHNO, SHIGENORI UCHIDA, OSAMU AMANO, HIROSHI SAKAGAMI, HIROSHI NAGASAKA
Anticancer Research Jul 2012, 32 (7) 2925-2933;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Cytotoxicity and Type of Cell Death Induced by Local Anesthetics in Human Oral Normal and Tumor cells
KATSUE KOBAYASHI, SEIKA OHNO, SHIGENORI UCHIDA, OSAMU AMANO, HIROSHI SAKAGAMI, HIROSHI NAGASAKA
Anticancer Research Jul 2012, 32 (7) 2925-2933;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Lidocaine Induces Apoptosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Through Activation of Bitter Taste Receptor T2R14
  • Lidocaine Induces Apoptosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Through Activation of Bitter Taste Receptor T2R14
  • Cytotoxicity of Dental Compounds towards Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Normal Oral Cells
  • Google Scholar
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire