Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Immunohistochemical Expression and Prognostic Significance of HIF-1α and VEGF-C in Neuroendocrine Breast Cancer

INGRID MARTON, FABIJAN KNEŽEVIĆ, SNJEŽANA RAMIĆ, MILAN MILOŠEVIĆ and DAVOR TOMAS
Anticancer Research December 2012, 32 (12) 5227-5232;
INGRID MARTON
1Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Sveti Duh University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ingridmarton@gmail.com
FABIJAN KNEŽEVIĆ
2Department of Pathology, Sestre Milosrdnice Clinical Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SNJEŽANA RAMIĆ
2Department of Pathology, Sestre Milosrdnice Clinical Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MILAN MILOŠEVIĆ
3Department for Environmental and Occupational Health, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia
4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAVOR TOMAS
2Department of Pathology, Sestre Milosrdnice Clinical Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
4School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To determine the predictive value of HIF-1α and VEGF-C in primary neuroendocrine breast cancers (NEBC) and their correlation with other clinico-pathological characteristics of NEBC. Materials and Methods: HIF-1α and VEGF-C were determined immunohistochemically in tissue samples from 31 cases of NEBC. Results: The HIF-1α expression in NEBC was predominantly negative, with only 5 (16.1%) cases showing strong reaction to HIF-1α. Eighteen (58.0%) NEBC cases showed moderate-to-strong VEGF-C expression. VEGF-C expression negatively correlated with progesterone receptor positivity (p=0.014) and duration of follow-up (p=0.021). A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that HIF-1α (p=0.019) was a significant predictor of disease-free survival, whereas VEGF-C (p=0.099) showed no such association. Conclusion: HIF-1α overexpression indicated unfavourable prognosis and could serve as an additional prognostic factor in NEBC. Moreover, patients with NEBC exhibiting moderate or strong VEGF-C expression could be candidates for a specific VEGF-C antibody therapy.

  • Neuroendocrine breast carcinoma
  • HIF-1α
  • VEGF-C

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of death in women, accounting for 23% (1.38 million) of total new cancer cases and 14% (458 400) of total cancer-related deaths in 2008, worldwide (1). According to the American Cancer Society, breast cancer incidence rates of approximately 200 per 100.000 women in USA, have remained stable over the past several years (2). Invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) comprises the largest group of invasive breast cancer. On the other hand, neuroendocrine breast cancer (NEBC) is one of the rarest types and accounts for only 2-5% of all breast cancer cases (3). NEBC exhibits morphological features very similar to those of neuroendocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract and lungs, which typically have adverse prognosis. According to the 2003 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumours, NEBC is defined as having ≥50% of tumour cells expressing neuroendocrine markers (3). Breast cancer-expressing neuroendocrine markers in scattered cells, called ‘breast cancer with focal endocrine differentiation’, is not included in this group. Recent studies have shown that focal endocrine differentiation has no prognostic value (4). According to the WHO, NEBC comprises of three different subtypes: solid, small/oat cell and large cell NEBC. All subtypes except the small-cell carcinoma have better prognosis than ductal NOS. Sapino et al. (5) described five NEBC subtypes, which include solid cohesive, alveolar, small-cell/Merkel cell-like, solid papillary and cellular mucinous carcinomas. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α), a transcription factor involved in tumour growth and metastasis, regulates genes that are involved in response to hypoxia (6), whereas vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) is one of the main inducers of lymphangiogenesis. VEGF-C overexpression is associated with lymphovascular invasion by tumour cells, increased rate of lymph node metastases and adverse prognosis (7). Recent studies have indicated HIF-1α and VEGF-C expressions to be potential targets for immunotherapy and antitumour treatment (8). The aim of our study was to determine the immunohistochemical expression of HIF-1α and VEGF-C in NEBC and its correlation with other clinicopathological characteristics of NEBC.

Materials and Methods

Patients. Data were analyzed for the period between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2005. Among a total of 3,058 cases diagnosed with breast cancer, 31 primary NEBC (sequential archival cases, Institute for Tumours, Sestre Milosrdnice Clinical Hospital Centre) cases were identified and included in the study (NEBC incidence of 1.01%). All samples diagnosed as NEBC were histologically and immunohistochemically reviewed by an experienced pathologist and all met the strict WHO criteria for diagnosis of NEBC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological characteristics of 31 patients with neuroendocrine breast carcinoma.

The patients were not treated with hormonal therapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. None of the patients had a second primary cancer or distant metastases at the time of the diagnosis and none died of disease during the follow-up (Table I). The TNM system, histological grade and immunohistochemical expression of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) were interpreted according to the 2003 WHO classification and 2007 the ASCO/CAP Guideline Recommendations (3, 9).

Immunohistochemical methods. Tumours were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h and cut into 3-7 sections. The specimens were embedded in paraffin, cut at 5 μm and routinely stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE). For each case, the HE sections were reviewed and the slide with the invasive tumour front was chosen for immunohistochemical analysis. For immunoperoxidase procedures, monoclonal mouse antihuman HIF-1α (1:25 dilution; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA) and monoclonal mouse antibody against VEGF-C (clone VG1, dilution 1:25; Dako, Glostrup, Dennmark), were used. Tissue sections, 3-5 μm thick, were cut from the paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, placed on object slides (Menzel-Glaser, Braunschweig, Germany) and incubated for 20 min in a thermostat at 60°C. The sections were de-paraffinized and incubated for 20 min in Target retrieval solution buffer (pH=9.0 S2367; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), at 97°C. Immunohistochemical staining was performed in an automated immunostainer (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) at room temperature. Subsequently, tissue slides were washed with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). After washing, the slides were incubated with a previously prepared primary antibody solution (1:50 dilution; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 45 min. After 30-min incubation, the antigen antibody complex was visualized by the addition of peroxidase-conjugated universal secondary antibody, which was incorporated in the reagent Dako EnVision (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Tissue sections were washed once more in Target retrieval solution buffer, and the chromogen (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was added for 5 min. Slides were washed in distilled water, stained with haematoxylin (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 1 min, washed again with water, dehydrated with alcohol (96%), cleared with xylene and mechanically covered. High-grade invasive ductal NOS breast carcinoma and colon carcinoma were used as positive controls for HIF-1α and VEGF-C, respectively. Replacement of the primary antibodies by isotype-matched immunoglobulin was used as a negative control.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Immunohistochemical expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) in 31 neuroendocrine breast carcinomas.

Immunoreactivity for both HIF-1α and VEGF-C in breast cancer tissue was determined by the percentage of positive tumour cells in the entire tissue section. Staining intensity was described as negative (−), weak (+), moderate (++) or strong (+++). All samples were examined independently by two experienced pathologists (FK, DT) and any differences were resolved by joint review.

Statistical analysis. All results are presented in both tabular and graphical forms. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine data distribution prior to statistical analysis. Data were analysed using the chi-square test with Yeats correction, Kaplan–Meier test and Cox proportional-hazards regression test. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistical Package 19.0.0.1 (www.spss.com).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Strong immunohistochemical expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) in neuroendocrine breast carcinoma. A: The expression of HIF-1α was mostly cytoplasmic, but in some cells, nuclear positivity was also observed (×400). B: VEGF-C expression was strictly confined to the cytoplasm (×400).

Results

The immunohistochemical expression of HIF-1α in NEBC was negative in more than half of the tissue samples (Table II). A strong reaction to HIF-1α was observed in only 5 out of 31 cases (Figure 1A). VEGF-C expression was predominantly moderate to strong. Eighteen tumours exhibited moderate to strong VEGF-C expression (Figure 1B). Correlation analysis showed that HIF-1α did not significantly correlate with any of the parameters, whereas VEGF-C negatively correlated with progesterone receptor positivity and duration of follow-up (Table III). In patients with stronger tumoral VEGF-C expression, progesterone receptor expression was significantly lower and follow-up time significantly shorter. Other clinicopathological parameters showed no significant correlation with VEGF-C expression. There was no statically significant correlation between HIF-1α and VEGF-C expression (p=0.387). Kaplan–Meier analysis of disease-specific survival, based on up to 144 months follow-up, showed a borderline statistical prognostic significance of HIF-1α expression (p=0.066) and no prognostic significance for VEGF-C expression (p=0.405). Most patients with moderate to strong HIF-1α expression had a relapse within 34 months. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (overall score: χ2 value=15.6, df=7, p=0.030) showed that HIF-1α (p=0.019) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2/neu) (p=0.034) were significant predictors of disease-free survival, whereas VEGF-C (p=0.099) progesterone (p=0.091) and oestrogen (p=0.112) receptor status, age (p=0.153) and tumour grade (p=0.321) showed no correlation. Patients with higher HIF-1α expression had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (Figure 2). A single patient with HER2/neu overexpression had a relapse 17 months after the initial diagnosis. However, no conclusions about the role of HER2/neu expression in NEBC may be drawn due to the fact that only a single patient in our study group had HER2/neu overexpression, which is insufficient for statistical analysis.

Discussion

Tumour hypoxia correlates with increased malignancy, metastatic potential and adverse prognosis in patients with invasive breast cancer (10). HIF-1α plays a crucial role in adaptation to hypoxia and is frequently activated in tumours. The activation of HIF-1α is considered to support the process of tumour growth through the activation of anaerobic metabolism and induction of angiogenesis that partly results from increased VEGF gene transcription (11). Direct correlations between HIF-1, VEGF and tumour angiogenesis have been demonstrated, but not entirely clarified (12). A significant association between HIF-1α overexpression and patient mortality has been shown for cervical, ovarian, brain, head and neck, oropharyngeal, oesophageal, nasopharyngeal and non-small cell lung cancer (13-20). Bos et al. (21) showed that the HIF-1α level was a strong and independent prognostic factor in patients with invasive breast cancer, especially in those with poorly-differentiated breast lesions and negative lymph nodes. Therefore, they proposed the use of immunohistochemical assessment of HIF-1α as a new predictor of poor outcome in this group of patients (21). VEGF-C is considered the main inducer of lymphangiogenesis and its overexpression was associated with lymphovascular invasion by tumour cells, increased rate of lymph node metastasis and adverse prognosis (22). Although most authors emphasize the direct association between VEGF-C and lymphangiogenesis, this has not been consistently confirmed. Several studies did not show any prognostic significance of VEGF-C in breast cancer, nor correlation between the angiogenic and lymphangiogenic microvessel density, VEGF-C expression and tumour diameter, grade, progression and patient survival (23, 24). In our study, the expression of HIF-1α in NEBC was predominantly weak, whereas VEGF-C was moderately or strongly expressed in more than half of the samples. High expression of HIF-1α was associated with adverse prognosis and earlier relapse of the disease. These findings are comparable with those of Bos et al. (21). However, the expression of VEGF-C failed to show any prognostic value, which supports previous findings by Gisterek et al. (23) and Al-Mowallad et al. (24). The expression of HIF-1 α and VEGF-C in neuroendocrine tumours has rarely been investigated at the same time. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first that investigated these two markers in NEBC. Partanen et al. (25) studied VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression in various neuroendocrine cells, such as alpha cells of the islets of Langerhans, prolactin-secreting cells in the anterior pituitary gland, adrenal medullary cells, and dispersed neuroendocrine cells in the gastrointestinal tract. Their results suggest that these factors could have a paracrine function and a possible role in peptide release from secretory granules from some neuroendocrine cells into the surrounding capillaries. Non-small cell lung carcinoma exhibits VEGF overexpression and its suppression might contribute, at least, to partial tumour regression (26). Monsef et al. (27) analyzed the expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α and VEGF in neuroendocrine cells of both benign and malignant prostate tumours and found that levels of VEGF were increased in androgen receptor-negative malignant neuroendocrine cells. In situ-hybridization indicated that HIF-1α mRNA levels were not higher in neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells than in corresponding non-neuroendocrine tumour cells (27). In our study, a similar correlation between progesterone receptor and VEGF-C was found. Progesterone receptor expression negatively correlated with VEGF-C expression, and tumour with low progesterone receptor expression had a significantly higher VEGF-C expression. Several new anticancer therapies are based on targeting VEGF. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits VEGF-A, has significantly changed the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004 (28). It is administered to patients with metastatic non-small lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, renal cancer, glioblastoma and advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (31-35). However, reports for its use in breast cancer treatment remained controversial and the FDA revoked the approval of the drug for this indication in 2011. Recently, unique HIF-1α antibody-conjugated nanomicelles filled with paclitaxel have been shown to be successful in the selective killing of gastric cancer cells with HIF-1α overexpression, thus pointing to HIF-1α as new potential target for specific antitumour therapy (36). In conclusion, we found both HIF-1α and VEGF-C to be expressed in NEBC. Since HIF-1α overexpression indicated an unfavourable prognosis, it could serve as an additional prognostic factor. Taking into account that more than half of the tumours exhibited moderate or strong VEGF-C expression, we may assume that patients with NEBC could be candidates for specific VEGF-C antibody therapy. Further larger studies on HIF-1α and VEGF-C expression in NEBC are needed to more accurately determine their potential prognostic and therapeutic benefits in NEBC.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that the intensity of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) expression could serve as an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival in patients with neuroendocrine breast carcinoma (odds ratio=145.92, 95% confidence interval=2.22-9188.54, p=0.019).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Correlation coefficients between hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) expression and clinicopathological parameters in neuroendocrine breast carcinoma: Spearman correlation coefficients (for nominal correlation Kendall's tau_b).

  • Received September 5, 2012.
  • Revision received October 17, 2012.
  • Accepted October 18, 2012.
  • Copyright© 2012 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Center MC,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Ward E,
    6. Forman D
    : Global cancer statistics. Ca Cancer J Clin 61: 69-90, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Anderson WF,
    2. Hormuzd AK,
    3. Rosenberg PS
    : Incidence of breast cancer in the United States: Current and future trends. J Natl Cancer Inst 103: 1-6, 2011.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Tavassoli FA,
    2. Devilee P
    : World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Tumors of the Beast and Female Genital Organs. IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2003.
  4. ↵
    1. Miremadi A,
    2. Pinder SE,
    3. Lee AH,
    4. Bell JA,
    5. Paish EC,
    6. Wencyk P,
    7. Elston CW,
    8. Nicholson RI,
    9. Blamey RW,
    10. Robertson JF,
    11. Ellis IO
    : Neuroendocrine differentiation and prognosis in breast adenocarcinoma. Histopathology 40: 215-222, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sapino A,
    2. Righi L,
    3. Cassoni P,
    4. Papotti M,
    5. Gugliotta P,
    6. Bussolati G
    : Expression of apocrine differentiation markers in neuroendocrine breast carcinomas of aged women. Mod Pathol 14: 768-776, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Dales J-P,
    2. Garcia S,
    3. Meunier-Carpentier S,
    4. Andrac-Meyer L,
    5. Haddad O,
    6. Lavaut MN,
    7. Allasia C,
    8. Bonnier P,
    9. Charpin C
    : Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1α predicts early relapse in breast cancer: Retrospective study in a series of 745 patients. Int J Cancer 116: 734-739, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Al-Mowallad A,
    2. Kirwan C,
    3. Byrne G,
    4. McDowell G,
    5. Li C,
    6. Stewart A,
    7. Al-Qouzi A,
    8. Kumar S
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor-C in patients with breast cancer. In Vivo 21: 549-551, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Schoppmann SF,
    2. Fenzl A,
    3. Schindl M,
    4. Bachleitner-Hofmann T,
    5. Nagy K,
    6. Gnant M,
    7. Horvat R,
    8. Jakesz R,
    9. Birner P
    : Hypoxia-inducible factor-α correlates with VEGF-C expression and lymphangiogenesis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99: 135-141, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Wolff AC,
    2. Hammond ME,
    3. Schwartz JN,
    4. Hagerty KL,
    5. Allred DC,
    6. Cote RJ,
    7. Dowsett M,
    8. Fitzgibbons PL,
    9. Hanna WM,
    10. Langer A,
    11. McShane LM,
    12. Paik S,
    13. Pegram MD,
    14. Perez EA,
    15. Press MF,
    16. Rhodes A,
    17. Sturgeon C,
    18. Taube SE,
    19. Tubbs R,
    20. Vance GH,
    21. van de Vijver M,
    22. Wheeler TM,
    23. Hayes DF,
    24. American Society of Clinical Oncology,
    25. College of American Pathologists
    : American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 118-125, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Semenza GL
    : Hypoxia, clonal selection, and the role of HIF-1α in tumor progression. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 35: 71-103, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ryan HE,
    2. Poloni M,
    3. McNulty W,
    4. Elson D,
    5. Gassmann M,
    6. Arbeit JM,
    7. Johnson RS
    : Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α is a positive factor in solid tumor growth. Cancer Res 60: 4010-4015, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Semenza GL
    : Regulation of mammalian O2 homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 399: 271-275, 1999.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Birner P,
    2. Schindl M,
    3. Obermair A,
    4. Plank C,
    5. Breitenecker G,
    6. Oberhuber G
    : Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α is a marker for an unfavorable prognosis in early-stage invasive cervical cancer. Cancer Res 60: 4693:4696, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Birner P,
    2. Schindl M,
    3. Obermair A,
    4. Breitenecker G,
    5. Oberhuber G
    : Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in epithelial ovarian tumors: Its impact on prognosis and on response to chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 7: 1661-1668, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Birner P,
    2. Gatterbauer B,
    3. Oberhuber G,
    4. Schindl M,
    5. Rossler K,
    6. Prodinger A,
    7. Budka H,
    8. Hainfellner JA
    : Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in oligodendrogliomas: Its impact on prognosis and on neoangiogenesis. Cancer 92: 165-171, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Beasley NJ,
    2. Leek R,
    3. Alam M,
    4. Turley H,
    5. Cox GJ,
    6. Gatter K,
    7. Millard P,
    8. Fuggle S,
    9. Harris AL
    : Hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α in head and neck cancer: Relationship to tumor biology and treatment outcome in surgically resected patients. Cancer Res 62: 2493-2497, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Aebersold DM,
    2. Burri P,
    3. Beer KT,
    4. Laissue J,
    5. Djonov V,
    6. Greiner RH,
    7. Semenza GL
    : Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α: A novel predictive and prognostic parameter in the radiotherapy of oropharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res 61: 2911-2916, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kurokawa T,
    2. Miyamoto M,
    3. Kato K,
    4. Cho Y,
    5. Kawarada Y,
    6. Hida Y,
    7. Shinohara T,
    8. Itoh T,
    9. Okushiba S,
    10. Kondo S,
    11. Katoh H
    : Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α (HIF-1α) in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma correlates with lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage. Br J Cancer 89: 1042-1047, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hui EP,
    2. Chan AT,
    3. Pezzella F,
    4. Turley H,
    5. To KF,
    6. Poon TC,
    7. Zee B,
    8. Mo F,
    9. Teo PM,
    10. Hung PM,
    11. Hung DP,
    12. Gatter KC,
    13. Johnson PJ,
    14. Harris Al
    : Coexpression of hypoxia-inducible factors 1α and 2α, carbonic anhydrase IX, and vascular endothelial growth factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and relationship to survival. Clin Cancer Res 8: 2595-2604, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Giatromanolaki A,
    2. Koukourakis MI,
    3. Sivirdis E,
    4. Turley H,
    5. Talks K,
    6. Pezzella F,
    7. Gatter KC,
    8. Harris AL
    : Relation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 α and 2 α in operable non-small cell lung cancer to angiogenic/molecular profile of tumors and survival. Br J Cancer 85: 881-890, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bos R,
    2. van der Groep P,
    3. Greijer AE,
    4. Shvarts A,
    5. Meijer S,
    6. Pinedo HM,
    7. Semenza GL,
    8. van Diest PJ,
    9. van der Wall E
    : Levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α independently predict prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer 97: 1573-1580, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mohammed RA,
    2. Green A,
    3. El-Shikh S,
    4. Paish EC,
    5. Ellis IO,
    6. Martin SG
    : Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial cell growth factors-A, -C and D in breast cancer and their relationship with angio- and lymphangiogenesis. Br J Cancer 96: 1092-1100, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Gisterek I,
    2. Matkowski R,
    3. Koźlak J,
    4. Duś D,
    5. Lacko A,
    6. Szelachowska J,
    7. Kornafel J
    : Evaluation of prognostic value of VEGF-C and VEGF-D in breast cancer – 10-year follow-up analysis. Anticancer Res 27: 2797-2802, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Al-Mowallad A,
    2. Kirwan C,
    3. Byrne G,
    4. McDowell G,
    5. Li C,
    6. Stewart A,
    7. Al-Qouzi A,
    8. Kumar S
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor-C in patients with breast cancer. In Vivo 21: 549-551, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Partanen TA,
    2. Arola J,
    3. Saaristo A,
    4. Jussila L,
    5. Ora A,
    6. Miettinen M,
    7. Stacker SA,
    8. Achen MG,
    9. Alitalo K
    : VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression in neuroendocrine cells and their receptor, VEGFR-3, in fenestrated blood vessels in human tissues. FASEB J 14: 2087-2096, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Sacewicz M,
    2. Lawnicka H,
    3. Siejka A,
    4. Stepień T,
    5. Krupiński R,
    6. Komorowski J,
    7. Stepień H
    : Inhibition of proliferation, VEGF secretion of human neuroendocrine tumor cell line NCL-H727 by an antagonist of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GNRH) in vitro. Cancer Lett 268: 120-128, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Monsef N,
    2. Helczynski L,
    3. Lundwall A,
    4. Pahlman S,
    5. Anders-Bjartell
    : Localization of immunoreactive HIF-1α and HIF-2α in neuroendocrine cells of both benign and malignant prostate glands. Prostate 67: 1219-1229, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Mayer RJ
    : Two steps forward in the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2406-2408, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Velcheti V,
    2. Viswanathan A,
    3. Govindan R
    : The proportion of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer potentially eligible for treatment with bevacizumab. A single institutional Survey. J Thorac Oncol 1: 607-610, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Saif MW
    : New developments in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Highlights from the 44th ASCO Annual Meeting. JOP 9: 391-397, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Rini BI
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor- targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma: current status and future directions. Clin Cancer Res 13: 1098-1106, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Burkhardt JK,
    2. Riina H,
    3. Shin BJ,
    4. Christos P,
    5. Kesavabhotla K,
    6. Hofstetter CP,
    7. Tsiouris AJ,
    8. Boockvar JA
    : Intra-arterial delivery of bevacizumab after blood-brain disruption for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: Progression-free survival and overall survival. World Neurosurg 77: 130-134, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Burger RA,
    2. Brady MF,
    3. Bookman MA,
    4. Walker JL,
    5. Homesley HD,
    6. Fowler J,
    7. Monk BJ,
    8. Greer BE,
    9. Boente M,
    10. Liang SX
    : Phase III trial of bevacizumab (BEV) in the primary treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), primary peritoneal cancer (PPC), or fallopian tube cancer (FTC): A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 28: 18s (suppl:abstr), 2010.
    1. Song H,
    2. He R,
    3. Wang K,
    4. Ruan J,
    5. Bao C,
    6. Li N,
    7. Ji J,
    8. Cui D
    : Anti-HIF-1α antibody-conjugated pluronic triblock copolymers encapsulated with paclitaxel for tumor targeting therapy. Biomaterials 8: 2302-2312, 2010.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 32 (12)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 32, Issue 12
December 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immunohistochemical Expression and Prognostic Significance of HIF-1α and VEGF-C in Neuroendocrine Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Immunohistochemical Expression and Prognostic Significance of HIF-1α and VEGF-C in Neuroendocrine Breast Cancer
INGRID MARTON, FABIJAN KNEŽEVIĆ, SNJEŽANA RAMIĆ, MILAN MILOŠEVIĆ, DAVOR TOMAS
Anticancer Research Dec 2012, 32 (12) 5227-5232;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Immunohistochemical Expression and Prognostic Significance of HIF-1α and VEGF-C in Neuroendocrine Breast Cancer
INGRID MARTON, FABIJAN KNEŽEVIĆ, SNJEŽANA RAMIĆ, MILAN MILOŠEVIĆ, DAVOR TOMAS
Anticancer Research Dec 2012, 32 (12) 5227-5232;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comprehensive Analysis of KREMEN2 as an Immunotherapeutic and Prognostic Biomarker in Pan-Cancer
  • PD-L1 mRNA Detection in Immunohistochemically Negative Patients: A Complementary Method for a Better Treatment Selection?
  • Immune Cell Infiltration and Clinical Significance of Angiogenesis-related Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Neuroendocrine breast carcinoma
  • HIF-1α
  • VEGF-C
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire