Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

siPGK1 Sensitizes Chemoresistant Human Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines to Cisplatin

CHARLOTTE LEPLEUX, EDWIGE ABEILARD-LEMOISSON, MARYLINE DUVAL, PHILIPPE ICARD and HUBERT LINCET
Anticancer Research October 2012, 32 (10) 4277-4286;
CHARLOTTE LEPLEUX
1University of Caen Basse-Normandie, BioTICLA EA 4656, IFR146 ICORE, Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EDWIGE ABEILARD-LEMOISSON
1University of Caen Basse-Normandie, BioTICLA EA 4656, IFR146 ICORE, Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARYLINE DUVAL
1University of Caen Basse-Normandie, BioTICLA EA 4656, IFR146 ICORE, Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PHILIPPE ICARD
1University of Caen Basse-Normandie, BioTICLA EA 4656, IFR146 ICORE, Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France
2Thoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Center, Caen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HUBERT LINCET
1University of Caen Basse-Normandie, BioTICLA EA 4656, IFR146 ICORE, Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: h.lincet@baclesse.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Errata - November 01, 2012

Abstract

Enhanced glycolysis provides essential intermediates for cancer cell proliferation. Its inhibition could be a promising approach for destroying tumors, especially those developing in hypoxic conditions, which are presumably the most chemoresistant. In hypoxic cells, glycolysis provides the main part of ATP. Phosphoglycerate kinase-1 (PGK1) catalyzes a crucial reaction of glycolysis that reconstitutes the two molecules of ATP previously consumed. PGK1 inhibition could arrest growth or kill hypoxic and/or chemoresistant cells. We tested siPGK1 transfection in two human ovarian cancer cells lines of increasing chemoresistance, and showed that: Expression of PGK1 was significantly reduced and associated with blockade of cell growth in the G1 phase; siPGK1 associated with cisplatin was more effective than cisplatin-alone at inhibiting proliferation of chemoresistant cells; siPGK1 -alone and -associated with cisplatin strongly increased expression of the BH3-only pro-apoptotic protein BCL-2 Interacting Mediator of cell death (BIM). PGK1 might be a key target for sensitizing chemoresistant cells to cisplatin.

  • Resistance
  • siPGK1
  • cisplatin
  • ovarian cancer
  • IGROV1
  • IGROV1-R10 cells

Glycolysis plays a main role in energy metabolism of cancer cells, which take-up glucose at higher rates than normal cells, and transform a significant part to lactate, even in the presence of oxygen. This phenomenon, referred to as aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg effect, is a common feature of tumor growth (1, 2). Enhanced glycolysis provides an increased supply of various precursors (such as ribose, glycerol and serine) required for nucleotide, protein and lipid synthesis (3-5). Cancer cells must produce great quantities of macromolecules and lipids to proliferate, and this metabolism must be sustained by a continuous production of ATP and co-factors (NAD+, NADPH, H+). Thus, glycolysis plays a critical role in tumor development, and several studies have shown that its inhibition could be a promising approach for cancer treatment (6-10).

Among the glycolytic enzymes, phosphoglycerate kinase-1 (PGK1) catalyzes a crucial step of glycolysis, transferring a phosphate group from 1,3-biphosphoglycerate to ADP, forming ATP and 3-phosphoglycerate. At this step, glycolysis has reached a break-even point because the two molecules of ATP which have been previously consumed are now reformed. This reaction could be of essential importance for producing ATP in hypoxic cells, where oxidative phosphorylation is slowed-down or arrested. Interestingly, overexpression of PGK1 has been observed in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines, and has been associated with a poor outcome of patients with multiple drug-resistant lung adenocarcinomas (11, 12). Thus, PGK1 might be an interesting target, inhibition of which could be able to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy, especially hypoxic cells which are likely to be the most chemoresistant ones (13, 14).

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most frequent cause of cancer-related death in women, often diagnosed at an advanced stage (75%), and is associated with poor survival (15-17). Despite a good response to surgery and to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rates for stage III and IV disease are 20%-30%, mainly due to intrinsic chemoresistance or to progressively-acquired resistance. In the present study, we investigated whether the small-inhibitory (si) RNA to PGK1 could sensitize human ovarian carcinoma cell lines to cisplatin.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and culture conditions. The IGROV1 cell line was established from a human ovarian adenocarcinoma and was obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France). The variant, highly chemoresistant cell line, IGROV1-R10, was established through a protocol that mimics the clinical protocol of cisplatin treatment leading to a complete cisplatin refractory state of cells (18). Cells were grown in RPMI medium supplemented with 4500 mg/l glucose, 2 mM Glutamax™, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10% fetal calf serum, 33 mM sodium bicarbonate (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere and split twice a week by trypsinization.

siRNA synthesis and transfection. All siRNAs used in these studies were chemically synthesized by Eurogentec (Liege, Belgium) and received as annealed oligonucleotides. The sequence of the double-stranded RNA used to inhibit PGK1 expression (noted siPGK1) was; sense: 5’ gagcuaaaguugcagacaa-3’ and anti-sense: 5’ uugucugcaac uuuagcuc 3’. The sequence of the control siRNA siGFP was; sense: 5’ gacguaaacggccacaagutt-3’ and anti-sense: 5’ acuuguggccgu uuacguctt-3’. The control siRNA does not bear any homology with any relevant human genes. According to the manufacturer's instruction, exponentially growing cells were seeded (2.5×105 cells per 25 cm2/flask) the day before reaching 30-50% confluency at the time of transfection. Briefly, the transfecting INTERFERin™ reagent (Polyplus Transfection, Strasbourg, France) was added to siRNA (20 nM) diluted in Opti-MEM® reduced serum medium (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France) and complex formation was allowed to proceed for 15 min at room temperature before being applied to cells. The next day, cell media were changed to remove the transfecting reagent. At the indicated time, cells were trypsinized and washed with cold PBS. Cell pellets were used directly or stored at −80°C for later use. At least two independent experiments were carried out and typical results are shown.

Analysis of cellular DNA content by flow cytometry. Preparation of cells: After exposure, detached cells were collected separately. Adherent cells were then harvested by trypsin/EDTA dissociation. Adherent and detached cells were pooled and washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) before being fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at −20°C until analysis. Before flow cytometric analysis, cells were washed in PBS and incubated for 30 min at a temperature of 37°C in PBS in order to allow the release of low molecular weight (m.w.) DNA, characteristic of apoptotic cells. After centrifugation at 4000 ×g for 10 min, the cell pellets were resuspended and stained with propidium iodide (PI) using DNA Prep Coulter Reagent Kit (Beckman-Coulter, Villepinte, France), at a final density of 106 cells/ml. Instrument settings: The samples were analyzed using an EPICS XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) equipped with an argon laser at 15 mW. PI-stained cells were analyzed using 488 nm excitation. A 620-nm band pass filter was placed on the red fluorescence of PI. Computerized gating was applied on the side and forward scatter to exclude very small debris and on pulse width and integral peak of red fluorescence to eliminate aggregates. All samples were analyzed at a flow rate lower than 100 events per second and with a sheath pressure of 30 psi.

Data analysis: the EXPO 32 Acquisition Software (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) was run for data acquisition.

Nuclear morphology study. After treatment, detached cells were separately collected and adherent cells were dissociated by trypsin/EDTA. Cells were then pooled and collected on a polylysine-coated glass slide by cytocentrifugation, fixed in an ethanol/chloroform/acetic acid solution (6:3:1), and incubated for 15 min, at room temperature, with a 1 μg/ml aqueous solution of 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole (DAPI). Slides were then extensively washed in distilled water, mounted in Mowiol and analyzed under a fluorescence microscope.

Western immunoblotting. Adherent cells were rinsed with deionized water and lysed with lysis buffer [pH 8.8, 30 mM Tris buffer containing 6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% CHAPS and 1x protease inhibitor mixture]. Western blots were carried out as previously described in detail (5). The membrane was either incubated overnight at 4°C in Tween-TBS-milk 5% with primary antibodies PGK1 (1:2000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), PARP (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), BCL-xL (1:1000), BIM (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology), tubulin (1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich). After three washes with Tween-TBS and one with TBS, immunoreactivity was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Prime kit; GE Healthcare, Velizy-Villacoublay, France).

Results

siPGK1 transfection significantly reduces the expression of PGK1 on human ovarian IGROV1 carcinoma cells. To determine whether siPGK1 could be down-regulated in ovarian cancer cells, total cellular extracts of IGROV1 cells previously transfected with siPGK1 (20 nM) 48 h before were analyzed by western blot. Analysis revealed a significant reduction of PGK1 protein expression in these transfected cells. No modification of PGK1 expression was induced in control cells [non-transfected or transfected with small-inhibitory Green Fluorescent Protein (siGFP)] (Figure 1A). Densitometric analysis (Figure 1B) showed a more than 60% reduction in the expression level of PGK1 in cells 48 h after siPGK1 transfection.

The reduced expression of PGK1 induces a blockage of cell growth and cell cycle in IGROV1 and IGROV1-R10 cells. IGROV1 and IGROV1-R10 cells which were cultured in monolayers and transfected with siPGK1, at 48 h after transfection, revealed the presence of many rounded cells, suggesting detached cells (Figure 2). In both lines, especially 72 h after siPGK1 transfection, cell layers were less confluent as compared to control cell lines (Figure 2). In comparison, the morphological features of layers of cells transfected with siGFP showed transfection and did not affect IGROV1 cell growth at any time.

DNA histogram analysis of IGROV1 cells transfected with siPGK1 showed a decrease in the proportion of viable cells in the S phase at 48 h, with an increase in those at G1 phase (Figure 3). However, this increase of G1 phase cells was transient, followed by a decrease occurring at 72 h, whereas the number of apoptotic cells increased from 4.2% to 10.4% (Figure 3). In the IGROV1-R10 cell line, similar results were obtained (data not shown).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Western blot analysis was performed 48 h after 20 nM small-inhibitory phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (siPGK1) transfection. As compared to non-transfected or small-inhibitory Green Fluorescent Protein (siGFP)-transfected cells, this transfection induced a reduction in the expression of PGK1 in IGROV1 cells (A), which was quantified by densitometric analysis (B).

siPGK1 treatment associated with cisplatin was more effective than cisplatin-alone on IGROV1 and IGROV1-R10 cells. At 24 h after siPGK1 transfection, IGROV1 and IGROV1-R10 cells were exposed to 5 μg/ml of cisplatin (referred as C5) (Figure 4). In IGROV1 cells, 24 h after this combined treatment (i.e. 48 h after transfection), the percentage of viable cells slightly decreased as compared to control cells (non transfected or transfected with siGFP, or cells treated with C5) (Figure 5A). At 72 h, the cytotoxicity was higher, both in cells treated by C5 alone and by combined treatment (siPGK1 plus C5), with 52% and 30% of viable cells remaining, respectively.

In IGROV1-R10 cells, this combined treatment (siPGK1 plus C5) also demonstrated a cytotoxic effect which increased from 48 h to 72 h, with only 30% of viable cells remaining at 72 h (Figure 5B). In contrast, cells exposed to C5-alone, siGFP or siPGK1 alone, demonstrated a transient inhibitory effect at 48 h, with a restarting of proliferation at 72 h, the percentage of viable cells exceeding 50% at this time.

siPGK1 treatment associated with cisplatin was more efficient at arresting cells in the G1 phase. Cytometric analysis confirmed the inhibition of IGROV1 and IGROV1-R10 cell growth by combined treatment, with a strong cellular arrest in the G1 phase, which persisted at 72 h (Figures 6A and 7). As the described above, IGROV1-R10 cells treated with C5 only exhibited a loss of blockage in the G2-M phases, with a restarting of proliferation at 72 h (Figure 7). In both cell lines treated with the combination of siPGK1 plus C5, the blockage in the G1 phase was accompanied by the appearance of a sub G0-G1 cell population, due to apoptotic cells, which was at least two-fold that of the control groups (i.e. C5 alone or siGFP plus C5) (Figure 6A and 7). In IGROV1 cells, the rate of cellular death, taking into account not only the sub G0-G1 apoptotic cells population but also apoptotic cells in the G2-M phases, reached 24.3% after siPGK1 plus C5, as compared to control groups which exhibited only 12% of cell death (Figure 6B). Similar results were obtained with IGROV1-R10 cells (data not shown).

siPGK1 treatment associated with cisplatin increased the expression of the BH3-only protein BIM. In IGROV1-R10 cells, by western blot, we studied the expression of various proteins which confirm apoptosis induction (PARP) or play a role in this process, as anti-apoptotic factors [Myeloid Cell Leukemia 1 (MCL-1), BCL-xL] or pro-apoptotic agents (BIM). Analysis confirmed the efficiency of siPGK1 which clearly reduced PGK1 expression at 72 h after transfection, both alone and when associated with cisplatin, although to a lesser degree (Figure 8). As compared to control groups, (C5 or siGFP plus C5), the siPGK1 plus C5 combination showed neither modulation of the state of PARP, nor PARP cleavage fragments (Figure 8B). In response to siPGK1 transfection, BCL-xL expression slightly increased as compared to that of control groups (Figure 8A), whereas it was not modified after siPGK1 plus C5 treatment (Figure 8B). MCL-1 protein expression was up-regulated in response to siPGK1 transfection (Figure 8A), but was not modified in response to siPGK1 8A), and was not modified in response to siPGK1 plus C5 (Figure 8B). BIM protein expression strongly increased after siPGK1-alone, and after siPGK1 plus C5 treatment.

Discussion

Chemoresistance is of paramount importance in cancer, because in the absence of an effective chemotherapy, other treatments (surgery, radiotherapy) are most often doomed to failure. This is particularly true for ovarian cancer, where survival is generally less than 50% at five years, as for many other types of solid cancer. Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic drug which forms intra- and inter-strand adducts with DNA, and is widely used in the treatment of solid tumors, such as ovarian cancer. The development of resistance to cisplatin remains a major hurdle to successful therapy. Although mechanisms of chemoresistance are multiple, it has been recognized for a long time that hypoxic cells, like those found in highly hypoxic core parts of tumors, are the most chemo- and radio-resistant cells (19, 20). To survive these hard conditions, lacking O2, cells necessarily adopt strategies of resistance, such as enhanced glycolysis or overexpression of antiapoptotic factors. It is likely that hypoxic cells are the most chemoresistant cells (13, 14). In cases of severe hypoxia, glycolysis becomes the main cause, if not the unique route, of ATP generation. Under such conditions, PGK1 regenerates the two molecules of ATP previously consumed, and thus, plays a crucial role in the functioning of glycolysis. PGK1 is a glycolytic enzyme that transforms 1,3 biphosphoglycerate to 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PG). Of importance, PGK1 has been found to be overexpressed in chemoresistant cells (5, 21). This enzyme would also appear to be a multifunctional molecule, implicated in tumor biology (22), angiogenesis (23), DNA replication and/or repair in mammalian nucleus (24, 25), and cell growth and/or metastasis (26). Moreover, PGK1 is also linked to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation (27), which in turn improves, the stability of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), resulting in accumulation of PGK1 (28).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Effects of small-inhibitory phosphoglycerate kinase-1 (siPGK1) and small-inhibitory Green Fluorescent Protein (siGFP) transfection in IGROV1 (A) and IGROV1-R10 (B). Cellular morphology 48 or 72 h after the beginning of transfection can be seen. Scale bars=20 μm.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Effects of small-inhibitory phosphoglycerate kinase-1 (siPGK1) and small-inhibitory Green Fluorescent Protein (siGFP) transfection in IGROV1 cell line on cell-cycle distribution, 48 or 72h h after the beginning of transfection.

In this study, we tested siPGK1 transfection in two human ovarian cancer cells lines, IGROV1 and IGROV1-R10, of increasing chemoresistance. Although siPGK1 reduced the expression of PGK1 to around 60%, this incomplete inhibition clearly induced the arrest of cell growth. This effect could be related to the provoked reduction of ATP and/or to the lack of 3-PG entering the serine pathway, which is involved in de novo protein and folate synthesis, two crucial pathways for cancer cell growth. Moreover, PGK1 under expression would promote the accumulation of DNA damage by unknown mechanisms (25), slowing down cellular proliferation.

As we previously reported, like others (6, 8, 9, 29),

glycolysis inhibition could be a promising approach for sensitizing chemoresistant cells to cisplatin. In the current study, we confirmed the benefit of associating cisplatin with a glycolytic inhibitor for overwhelming chemoresistance. Indeed, cisplatin associated with siPGK1, induced more cell death, which was of particular interest in our highly chemoresistant IGROV1-R10 cells. The decrease of ATP might induce cells to repair DNA damage induced by cisplatin or to expel chemotherapeutic drugs, a process requiring ATP (30, 31). Moreover, the lack of ATP favors the unfolding protein accumulation induced by cisplatin, leading to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. ER stress is characterized by induction of the pro-apoptotic protein BIM (32), which plays a critical role in the initiation of apoptosis in response to multiple death stimuli, including growth factor deprivation (33). In our study, siPGK1-alone and -associated with cisplatin strongly increased BIM expression. This expression is known to trigger the translocation of BAX to the mitochondria and to facilitate cell killing through the activation of BAX (34). It is noteworthy that BIM is linked to MCL-1 and neutralizes the antiapoptotic effect of this protein. In our study, although we observed an increase of MCL-1 under treatment with siPGK1 alone and when associated with cisplatin, it is likely that the activation of BIM was the dominant effect. However, the mechanisms by which the combination of siPGK1 with cisplatin exerts antitumor activity remain to be elucidated.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Protocol of exposure regarding the treatment by cisplatin (5 μg/ml=C5), administered 24 h after transfection. The culture was arrested either 48 h or 72 h after the beginning of transfection.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

The percentage of viable cells at 48 and 72 h in IGROV1 (A) and IGROV1-R10 (B) in control groups as compared to cisplatin treatment-alone or -associated with 20 nM small-inhibitory phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (siPGK1).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Effect on cell-cycle distribution of the combination of 20 nM small-inhibitory phosphoglycerate kinase-1 (siPGK1) and (C5) in IGROV1 cells at 48 and 72 h after transfection. DNA content histograms are expressed either by flow cytometry (A), or as forward scatter (FS), as a function of propidium iodide fluorescence (FL3) (B).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Effect on cell-cycle distribution of the combination of 20 nM small-inhibitory phosphoglycerate kinase-1 (siPGK1) and C5 treatment of IGROV1-R10 cells at 48 and 72 h after transfection. DNA content histograms were determined by flow cytometry.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Analysis of PARP, PGK1, MCL-1, BCL-xL and BIM protein expressions in IGROV1-R10 cells, at 72 h by western blotting, after transfection alone by siRNA (A), or after exposure to cisplatin-alone or combined with siRNA (B).

Finally, our preliminary results demonstrated that siPGK1 can be interestingly combined with cisplatin to overcome chemoresistance of ovarian cancer. These results reinforce the interest in using and developing glycolytic inhibitors (26), especially these targeting PGK1, as new strategies for combating cancer development and chemoresistance.

  • Received June 25, 2012.
  • Revision received August 21, 2012.
  • Accepted August 22, 2012.
  • Copyright© 2012 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Warburg O
    : The metabolism of tumors. Constable & Co. Ltd., London, 1930.
  2. ↵
    1. Warburg O
    : On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123: 309-314, 1956.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Gatenby RA,
    2. Gawlinski ET
    : The glycolytic phenotype in carcinogenesis and tumor invasion: Insights through mathematical models. Cancer Res 63: 3847-3854, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Icard P,
    2. Poulain L,
    3. Lincet H
    : Understanding the central role of citrate in the metabolism of cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1825: 111-116, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lincet H,
    2. Guével B,
    3. Pineau C,
    4. Allouche S,
    5. Lemoisson E,
    6. Poulain L,
    7. Gauduchon P
    : Comparative 2D-DIGE proteomic analysis of ovarian carcinoma cells: Toward a reorientation of biosynthesis pathways associated with acquired platinum resistance. J Proteomics 75: 1157-1169, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Lu Y,
    2. Zhang XD,
    3. Lan J,
    4. Huang G,
    5. Varin E,
    6. Lincet H,
    7. Poulain L,
    8. Icard P
    : Citrate induces apoptotic cell death: A promising way for treating gastric carcinoma? Anticancer Res 31: 797-805, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Simons AL,
    2. Mattson DM,
    3. Dornfeld K,
    4. Spitz DR
    : Glucose deprivation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and cancer therapy. J Cancer Res Ther 5 (Suppl 1): S2-S6, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Varin E,
    2. Denoyelle C,
    3. Brotin E,
    4. Meryet-Figuiere M,
    5. Giffard F,
    6. Abeilard E,
    7. Goux D,
    8. Gauduchon P,
    9. Icard P,
    10. Poulain L
    : Downregulation of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 is sufficient to induce cell death in mesothelioma cells highly refractory to conventional chemotherapy. Carcinogenesis 31: 984-993, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Deslandes E,
    3. Villedieu M,
    4. Poulain L,
    5. Duval M,
    6. Gauduchon P,
    7. Schwartz L,
    8. Icard P
    : Effect of 2-deoxy-D-glucose on various malignant cell lines in vitro. Anticancer Res 26: 3561-3566, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Varin E,
    3. Allouche S,
    4. Lu Y,
    5. Poulain L,
    6. Icard P
    : Effect of citrate on malignant pleural mesothelioma cells: A synergistic effect with cisplatin. Anticancer Res 29: 1249-1254, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Chen G,
    2. Gharib TG,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Huang CC,
    5. Kuick R,
    6. Thomas DG,
    7. Shedden KA,
    8. Misek DE,
    9. Taylor JM,
    10. Giordano TJ,
    11. Kardia SL,
    12. Iannettoni MD,
    13. Yee J,
    14. Hogg PJ,
    15. Orringer MB,
    16. Hanash SM,
    17. Beer DG
    : Protein profiles associated with survival in lung adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 13537-13542, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Duan Z,
    2. Lamendola DE,
    3. Yusuf RZ,
    4. Penson RT,
    5. Preffer FI,
    6. Seiden MV
    : Overexpression of human phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) induces a multidrug-resistance phenotype. Anticancer Res 22: 1933-1941, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bertout JA,
    2. Patel SA,
    3. Simon MC
    : The impact of O2 availability on human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 967-975, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Vaupel P,
    2. Mayer A
    : Hypoxia in cancer: Significance and impact on clinical outcome. Cancer Metastasis Rev 26: 225-239, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Cannistra SA
    : Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med 351: 2519-2529, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chi DS,
    2. Sabbatini P
    : Advanced ovarian cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 1: 139-146, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Salom E,
    2. Almeida Z,
    3. Mirhashemi R
    : Management of recurrent ovarian cancer: Evidence-based decisions. Curr Opin Oncol 14: 519-527, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Poulain L,
    2. Lincet H,
    3. Duigou F,
    4. Deslandes E,
    5. Sichel F,
    6. Gauduchon P,
    7. Staedel C
    : Acquisition of chemoresistance in a human ovarian carcinoma cell is linked to a defect in cell cycle control. Int J Cancer 78: 454-463, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Monti E,
    2. Gariboldi MB
    . HIF-1 as a target for cancer chemotherapy, chemosensitization and chemoprevention. Curr Mol Pharmacol 4: 62-77, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kessler J,
    2. Hahnel A,
    3. Wichmann H,
    4. Rot S,
    5. Kappler M,
    6. Bache M,
    7. Vordermark D
    . HIF-1alpha inhibition by siRNA or chetomin in human malignant glioma cells: effects on hypoxic radioresistance and monitoring via CA9 expression. BMC Cancer 10: 605-616, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gong F,
    2. Peng X,
    3. Zeng Z,
    4. Yu M,
    5. Zhao Y,
    6. Tong A
    : Proteomic analysis of cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer using 2-DE method. Mol Cell Biochem 348: 141-147, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kabbage M,
    2. Chahed K,
    3. Hamrita B,
    4. Guillier CL,
    5. Trimeche M,
    6. Remadi S,
    7. Hoebeke J,
    8. Chouchane L
    : Protein alterations in infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast as detected by nonequilibrium pH gradient electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. J Biomed Biotechnol 2008: 564127, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Lay AJ,
    2. Jiang XM,
    3. Kisker O,
    4. Flynn E,
    5. Underwood A,
    6. Condron R,
    7. Hogg PJ
    : Phosphoglycerate kinase acts in tumour angiogenesis as a disulphide reductase. Nature 408: 869-873, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Popanda O,
    2. Fox G,
    3. Thielmann HW
    : Modulation of DNA polymerases alpha, delta and epsilon by lactate dehydrogenase and 3-phosphoglycerate kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1397: 102-117, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Vishwanatha JK,
    2. Jindal HK,
    3. Davis RG
    : The role of primer recognition proteins in DNA replication: Association with nuclear matrix in HeLa cells. J Cell Sci 101(Pt 1): 25-34, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Zieker D,
    2. Konigsrainer I,
    3. Weinreich J,
    4. Beckert S,
    5. Glatzle J,
    6. Nieselt K,
    7. Buhler S,
    8. Loffler M,
    9. Gaedcke J,
    10. Northoff H,
    11. Mannheim JG,
    12. Wiehr S,
    13. Pichler BJ,
    14. von Weyhern C,
    15. Brucher BL,
    16. Konigsrainer A
    : Phosphoglycerate kinase 1-promoting tumor progression and metastasis in gastric cancer – detected in a tumor mouse model using positron-emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Cell Physiol Biochem 26: 147-154, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Yoo BS,
    2. Regnier FE
    : Proteomic analysis of carbonylated proteins in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis using avidin-fluorescein affinity staining. Electrophoresis 25: 1334-1341, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Marin-Hernandez A,
    2. Gallardo-Perez JC,
    3. Ralph SJ,
    4. Rodriguez-Enriquez S,
    5. Moreno-Sanchez R
    : HIF-1alpha modulates energy metabolism in cancer cells by inducing over-expression of specific glycolytic isoforms. Mini Rev Med Chem 9: 1084-1101, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Varin E,
    3. Briand M,
    4. Allouche S,
    5. Heutte N,
    6. Schwartz L,
    7. Poulain L,
    8. Icard P
    : Novel therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma based on anti-energetic effect: An experimental study using 3-Bromopyruvate on nude mice. Anticancer Res 29: 1443-1448, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Barthomeuf C,
    2. Bourguet-Kondracki ML,
    3. Kornprobst JM
    : Marine metabolites overcoming or circumventing multidrug resistance mediated by ATP-dependent transporters: A new hope for patient with tumors resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 8: 886-903, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Han B,
    2. Zhang JT
    : Multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy and xenobiotic protection mediated by the half ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents 4: 31-42, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Coloff JL,
    3. Ferguson EC,
    4. Jacobs SR,
    5. Cui K,
    6. Rathmell JC
    : Glucose metabolism attenuates p53 and Pula-dependent cell death upon growth factor deprivation. J Biol Chem 283: 36344-36353, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Bouillet P,
    2. Metcalf D,
    3. Huang DC,
    4. Tarlinton DM,
    5. Kay TW,
    6. Kontgen F,
    7. Adams JM,
    8. Strasser A
    : Proapoptotic Bcl-2 relative Bim required for certain apoptotic responses, leukocyte homeostasis, and to preclude autoimmunity. Science 286: 1735-1738, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Lalier L,
    2. Cartron PF,
    3. Juin P,
    4. Nedelkina S,
    5. Manon S,
    6. Bechinger B,
    7. Valette FM
    : Bax activation and mitochondrial insertion during apoptosis. Apoptosis 12: 887-896, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 32 (10)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 32, Issue 10
October 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
siPGK1 Sensitizes Chemoresistant Human Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines to Cisplatin
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
siPGK1 Sensitizes Chemoresistant Human Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines to Cisplatin
CHARLOTTE LEPLEUX, EDWIGE ABEILARD-LEMOISSON, MARYLINE DUVAL, PHILIPPE ICARD, HUBERT LINCET
Anticancer Research Oct 2012, 32 (10) 4277-4286;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
siPGK1 Sensitizes Chemoresistant Human Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines to Cisplatin
CHARLOTTE LEPLEUX, EDWIGE ABEILARD-LEMOISSON, MARYLINE DUVAL, PHILIPPE ICARD, HUBERT LINCET
Anticancer Research Oct 2012, 32 (10) 4277-4286;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Errata
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Inhibition of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) by Tiplaxtinin Reduces Aggressiveness of Cervical Carcinoma Cells
  • High Expression of OR1F1 Protein as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Epigallocatechin Gallate Induces miR-192/215 Suppression of EGR1 in Gastric Cancer
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • resistance
  • siPGK1
  • cisplatin
  • ovarian cancer
  • IGROV1
  • IGROV1-R10 cells
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire