Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Circulating Transforming Growth Factor-β and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as Related to Virus Infection in Liver Carcinogenesis

ROSA DIVELLA, ANTONELLA DANIELE, COSIMO GADALETA, ANTONIO TUFARO, MARIA TERESA VENNERI, ANGELO PARADISO and MICHELE QUARANTA
Anticancer Research January 2012, 32 (1) 141-145;
ROSA DIVELLA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rosadive@inwind.it
ANTONELLA DANIELE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
COSIMO GADALETA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIO TUFARO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA TERESA VENNERI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANGELO PARADISO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHELE QUARANTA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to improve the detection of HCC by measuring alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in addition to other molecular markers by estimating the plasma concentration of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In particular, the role of hepatitis C and B viruses (HCV and HBV) infection was evaluated with relation to TGF-β and EGFR plasma concentration. Materials and Methods: Eighty-five patients with liver disease, 54 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 16 with liver metastasis (LM), 15 with liver cirrhosis (LC) and 30 healthy volunteers were evaluated. AFP, TGF-β and EGFR were detected with enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) in plasma of all study participants. Results: The mean values of TGF-β and EGFR in all patients were much higher than in control group, p<0.0001. In HCC patients the levels of TGF-β and EGFR were much higher than in LM and LC patients. Moreover, TGF-β and EGFR were significantly higher in the presence of both viruses or only in the presence of HCV, p=0.002. No decrease or increase of AFP was noted in these patients. Conclusion: Our data suggest the reliability of TGF-β and EGFR in detecting HCC, in particular when the carcinogenesis is affected by virus infection.

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • TGF-β in liver carcinogenesis
  • EGFR in liver cancer
  • HCV and HBV liver infection

In industrialized countries, an increase in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence and mortality has been observed, being attributed to increased prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (1, 2). Chronic infection with hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been implicated in about 80% of HCC cases worldwide. HBV and HCV can be implicated in the development of HCC indirectly through induction of inflammation, necrosis and chronic hepatocellular regeneration, and directly by means of viral proteins, or, in the case of HBV, by creating insertional mutations by integration into the genome of hepatocytes (3). A number of HBV integrations have been shown to occur into or adjacent to genes that have important roles in oncogenesis. In contrast to HBV, HCV is an RNA virus that lacks a reverse-transcriptase enzyme and which cannot integrate into the host genome. Thus the molecular pathogenetic mechanisms by which HCV contributes to cell transformation remain unclear (4). Like other solid tumors, HCC is characterized by the accumulation of numerous genomic alterations. These include the progressive loss of liver-specific gene expression and the persistence of an inflammatory and promitogenic milieu orchestrated by a complex network of cytokines and growth factors (5).

Active research has identified a number of growth and signaling pathways involved in the support of cell proliferation and survival from the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis, and in the autonomous growth and drug resistance of transformed HCC cells. Among these signaling systems, those controlled by trasforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of growth factors are believed to play a prominent role (6, 7). Most of these growth factors, receptors and signaling cascades are part of tightly controlled regenerative and protective natural responses of the liver to acute tissue injury. TGF-β has been shown to play contradictory roles in liver development and carcinogenesis. On one hand, TGF-β secretion inhibits proliferation, suppresses transformation and induces apoptosis in HCC. On the other hand, its activation has been associated with the progression of hepatocarcinogenesis, and distribution of TGF-β signaling can deregulate apoptosis in HCC (8-10). Indeed, expression of TGF-β itself is often increased in HCC.

EGF receptor (EGFR) has emerged as a critical signaling hub capable of integrating and transducing a variety of signals from different sources that can have an impact on cancer progression. A role of EGFR and its ligands in liver regeneration and hepatoprotection during tissue injury has been clearly established, and accumulating observations support the notion that dysregulation of EGFR signaling participates in hepatocarcinogenesis (11). The interaction of the EGFR system with the inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic TGF-β may be of special relevance in liver carcinogenesis. TGF-β has been demonstrated to induce the expression of EGFR ligands such as EGF and TGF-α in isolated fetal rat hepatocytes through the activation of the inflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-KB) (12).

Interestingly, there is increasing evidence that hepatitis B (HPB) and C (HPC) viral proteins can directly interact with cellular components of growth factor signaling cascades. Such interactions can result in a direct oncogenic effect that may act independently or in cooperation with the hyperproliferative response triggered by chronic inflammation and hepatocellular death, and contribute to explain the enhanced risk of hepatocellular transformation observed upon chronic viral infection (13, 14).

The most common method used to detect overexpression of EGFR is immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded specimens. Enzyme-linked immunoassay ELISA was recently developed and allows quantitative determination of the extracellular domain (ECD) of EGFR in the plasma/serum of cancer patients (15). A significantly elevated plasma level of EGFR in cancer patients compared with healthy controls was demonstrated in lung, colon and breast cancer (16-19). Determination of plasma levels of EGFR in patients with HCC may provide valuable information, considering the high expression of EGFR in HCC tissue, as well as the potential usefulness of plasma assay in the clinical setting. Increased EGFR expression might therefore be a strong prognostic feature in multiple tumor types, and the inhibition of its cellular actions may produce substantial therapeutic benefit. The primary marker for HCC is alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), a single polypeptide chain glycoprotein. Generally AFP shows acceptable sensitivity as a marker for HCC; however, AFP is not secreted in all cases of HCC and may be present at normal levels in as many as 40% of patients with early HCC (20, 21). The aim of this study was to verify a possible role for the detection of HCC by measuring molecular markers involved in the process of cancer invasion and metastasis by estimating the plasma concentration of circulating TGF-β and EGFR in peripheral blood of patients with HCC. In particular, the role of HCV and HBV infection was evaluated with relation to plasma concentrations of TGF-β and EGFR.

Materials and Methods

Patients. From June 2007 to December 2010, 85 patients, 63 male (74.1%) and 22 female (25.8%), aged from 45 to 87 years (median, 73 years) with liver disease were enrolled in this study at the Giovanni Paolo II National Cancer Institute (NCI) of Bari, Italy. Among the 85 patients, 54 (63.5%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 16 (18.8%) had liver metastasis (LM) from other tumors and 15 (17.6%) had liver cirrhosis (LC). In regard to the 54 patients with HCC, 19 (35.18%) had antibody positivity for both HCV and HBV, 8 (14.81%) were positive only for HCV virus, and 27 (50%) were negative for both viruses. In our series, HBV infection was always associated with HCV presence. For all patients the clinicopathological characteristics (gender, age, etiology, underlying liver disease, total bilirubin, albumin, alanine, presence of metastasis) were evaluated. A control group was enrolled among donors (n=30) found to be healthy from laboratory data and imaging techniques. Their median age was 50 years (range, 40-70 years). Five milliliters of peripheral blood were collected from each participant in a vacutainer system with lithium-heparin. Samples were collected from each participant before any invasive procedures or therapy. Plasma from both patients and healthy donors was immediately separated from the cellular fraction by centrifugation at 2,500 r.p.m. (1,500 × g) for 10 min and frozen at −20°C. A written consent should be obtained from all patients prior to enrolment in the study, and the Ethical Committee of the NCI approved the protocol which was in accord with the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

TGF-β and EGFR ELISA assay. Plasma samples from the patients and the controls were assayed for the levels of TGF-β and EGFR extracellular domain (ECD) by a sandwich ELISA assay (Quantikine, Human TGF-β and Human EGFR Immunoassay; R&D Systems, Inc. Minneapolis, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The absorbance of the solution produced was measured at 490 nm. The absorbance is directly proportional to the amount of TGF-β/EGFR present in the sample. A standard curve was constructed by plotting the mean absorbance value measured for each standard versus its corresponding concentration. The minimal detection limit was 4.61 pg/mL for TGF-β and 0.014 ng/mL for EGFR.

AFP assay. AFP was tested by using commercially available immunometric assay (Architect AFP assay, Abbot Laboratories, North Chicago, IL, USA). The cut-off value of AFP for HCC was set at 20 ng/ml, the most commonly set value. The minimal detection limit of the AFP was 0.013 ng/mL.

Statistical analysis. The results are expressed as means±standard deviation. For the continuous variables data were analyzed by unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskal-Wallis test, as well as analysis of variance (ANOVA). The correlation between TGF-β and EGFR was analyzed by Spearman correlation. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyzes were performed by NCSS-PASS (Statistical Analysis and sample Size – Power Analysis and Graphics) 2007 software.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Association between trasforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plasma concentrations and clinical characteristics of patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and alpha- fetoprotein (AFP) concentration in association with HCC viral infection.

Results

The mean values of TGF-β and EGFR for all patients were 977±458 pg/ml and 78.3±30.5 ng/ml respectively, both much higher with respect to those reported for control group 39.5±9.8 pg/ml for TGF-β (p<0.0001, t-test) and 58.5±8.22 ng/ml for EGFR (p<0.0001, t-test). Levels of TGF-β and EGFR plasma concentration were studied in relation to patient clinical and pathological characteristics (Table I). Significant differences were observed when considering the diagnosis, for HCC patients the plasma concentrations of TGF-β and EGFR were much higher with respect to that of LM patients and in those patients with LC: for TGF-β the plasma levels (pg/ml) were 1194±331 in HCC, 421±184 in LM and 419±204 in LC (p<0.0001, ANOVA), for EGFR plasma levels (ng/ml) were 86±31.8, 63±15.4, 48±9.2 respectively (p<0.0001, ANOVA). When HCC patients were divided into two groups according to serum AFP level, no significant difference in plasma TGF-β and EGFR were found between patients with AFP< 20ng/ml and those with AFP ≥20 ng/ml. TGF-β and EGFR did not relate to gender, age, tumor differentiation (unpaired t-test). In Table II were reported the plasma association of TGF-β and EGFR in HCC patients to viral infection. The levels of TGF-β and EGFR were higher in the presence of both viruses compared to when there was no viral infection: for TGF-β (1323±328.2 pg/ml in HBV+/HCV+ patients compared to 1044±302 pg/ml in HBV−/HCV− patients, p=0.02, ANOVA), for EGFR (110±36.2 ng/ml in HBV+/HCV+ patients compared to 64±11.8 ng/ml in HBV-/HCV- patients, p<0.0001, ANOVA). Positivity for TGF-β in HCC patients was defined level ≥1200 pg/ml (the median value) and for EGFR level ≥80 ng/ml (the median value). A total of 62.9% (N=34) of HCC patients were positive for TGF-β, of them 25 patients (73.3%) were positive for viral infection and 9 (26.7%) were negative for both virus. Positivity for EGFR was observed in 29 patients (53.7%), of whom 27 (91.1%) were positive for HCV/HBV infection and 2 (6.8%) were negative for both viruses. No association was noted for AFP with HCC viral infection. When the TGF-β plasma concentration and EGFR were compared as continuous variables, a significant direct correlation between the two markers was found (Spearman correlation p=0.001, r=0.5), Figure 1.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Scatter plot showing correlation between circulating transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). (Spearman correlation r=0.51, p=0.001).

Discussion

The aim of our study was to examine the correlation between circulating plasma levels of TGF-β and EGFR in patients with HCC in relation to viral infection. This study is the first to examine the plasma EGFR concentrations in HCC patients. The mean levels of TGF-β and EGFR were significantly more elevated in HCC patients than in healthy controls (p<0.0001). These data are in accordance with that of a previous study which clearly demonstrated that plasma levels of TGF-β in patients with HCC were significantly higher than those found in healthy donors and that plasma levels decreased progressively in tumor-free patients during follow-up, while increasing in those in whom a recurrence occurred (22-24). These date confirm the results obtained from numerous studies that TGF-β plays a crucial role in the process leading to initiation of hepatocellular fibrogenesis (25, 26). TGF-β, is a potent cytokine involved in many functions such as epithelial mesenchymal transition, tissue morphogenesis, angiogenesis, and hence tumor progression, invasion and metastasis (27). In liver, TGF-β has a profibrotic activity, and is involved in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and HCC (28). During the last few years, data have accumulated suggesting that TGF-β actions may be modulated by other growth factors or cytokines (29). In fact, in our study, a direct correlation was shown between circulating plasma levels of TGF-β and EGFR. EGF is an important survival signal for TGF-β-induced apoptosis in hepatocytes. Indeed, some autocrine signals, such as EGFR ligands, might protect liver tumor cells from TGF-β-induced apoptosis (30). Inhibiting EGFR greatly increases apoptosis induced by TGF-β in such cells. Caja et al. suggested that in HCC, inhibition of EGFR would be a useful therapeutic target since it would not only result in attenuation of tumor cell proliferation, but it would also enhance pro-apoptotic signaling by TGF-β, as the levels of this cytokine are elevated in HCC (31). In hepatoma cells, this dual response to TGF-β might convert this cytokine to a pro-tumorigenic factor in hepatocarcinogenesis (32). Furthermore, recent genomic profiling studies have revealed that many inflammation-related genes are involved in virus-related hepatocarcinogenesis hypothesizing the central role of inflammation in the development of HCC. HBV or HCV infection can result in hepatocyte inflammation and high regenerative potential (33, 34). For this reason, in this study, circulating plasma TGF-β and EGFR have been analyzed in primary liver tumors with and without virus infection. Significantly, higher plasma levels of TGF-β and EGFR were observed when virus infection, both HBV and/or HCV were present. In the present study, the high positive rate of TGF-β and EGFR plasma levels in patients with HCC HCV+/HBV+, suggesting that HBV protein and HCV core protein may stimulate the expression of TGF-β and EGFR. This confirms that the presence of virus increases risk for HCC. Hepatocytes produce fibrogenic mediators after viral infection. For example, HCV patients have an increased expression of TGF-β signaling proteins (TGF-βRII and ligands) throughout the liver tissue (35). It would seem that the HCV core protein is taken up by hepatocytes and can directly induce the expression of TGF-β. The increase in serum TGF-β in HCC patients was repeatedly reported, HCV may enhance the increase of this growth factor. Moreover, in HCV patients who respond to interferon-alpha or ribavirin treatment, TGF-β levels decrease (36). Our data suggested that these factors could be more useful than or associated with the AFP test in the diagnosis of HCC and that the direct correlation between EGFR and TGF-β plasma levels suggest that the inhibition of EGFR would be a useful therapeutic target in HCC prevention and treatment. Therefore there is the possibility that the determination of plasma EGFR and TGF-β is useful for the prediction of prognosis of follow-up after treatment in those patients with HCC correlated to virus infection.

  • Received November 9, 2011.
  • Revision received December 1, 2011.
  • Accepted December 3, 2011.
  • Copyright© 2012 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. El-Serag HB,
    2. Rudolph L
    : Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 132: 2557-2576, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Marrero CR,
    2. Marrero JA
    : Viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Med Res 38: 612-620, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Key MC
    : interaction between hepatitis B and C viruses in hepatocellular carcinogenesis. J Viral Hepat 13: 145-149, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lauren-Puig P,
    2. Legdix P,
    3. Bluteau O,
    4. Belghiti J,
    5. Franco D,
    6. Binot F,
    7. Monges G,
    8. Thomas G,
    9. Bioulac-Sage P,
    10. Zucman-Rossi J
    : Genetic alterations associated with hepatocellular carcinomas define distinct pathways of hepatocarcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 120: 1763-1773, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Shilpa J,
    2. Shashideep S,
    3. Peng L,
    4. Ruliang X
    : Molecular genetics of hepatocellular neoplasia. Am J Transl Res 2(1): 105-118, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Berasain C,
    2. Castillo J,
    3. Prieto J,
    4. Avila MA
    : New molecular targets for hepatocellular carcinoma: the ERBB1 signaling system. Liver Int 27(2): 174-185, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Giannelli G,
    2. Mazzocca A,
    3. Fransvea E,
    4. Lahn M,
    5. Antonacci S
    : Inhibiting TGF-b signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochim e Biophys Acta 1815: 214-223, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Valdes F,
    2. Alvarez AM,
    3. Losascio A,
    4. Vega S,
    5. Herrera B,
    6. Fernandez M
    : The epithelial-mesenchymal transition confers resistance to the apoptotic effects of transforming growth factor beta in fetal rat hepatocytes. Mol Cancer Res 1: 68-78, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Valdes F,
    2. Murillo MM,
    3. Valverde AM,
    4. Herrera B,
    5. Sanchez A,
    6. Benito M
    : Transforming growth factor-beta activates both proapoptotic and survival signals in fetal rat hepatocytes. Exp Cell Res 292: 209-218, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Fabreagat I,
    2. Roncero C,
    3. Fernandez M
    : Survival and apoptosis: a dysregulated balance in liver cancer. Liver Int 27: 155-162, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Bersain C,
    2. Perugorria MJ,
    3. Latasa MU,
    4. Castillo J,
    5. Goni S,
    6. Santamaria M
    : The epidermal growth factor receptor: a link between inflammation and liver cancer. Exp Biol Med 234: 713-725, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Caja L,
    2. Ortiz C,
    3. Bertran E,
    4. Murillo MM,
    5. Mirò-Obradors MJ,
    6. Palacios E,
    7. Fabregat I
    : Differential intracellular signaling induced by TGF-β in rat adult hepatocytes and hepatoma cells: inplications in liver carcinogenesis. Cell Signal 19: 683-694, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wu BW,
    2. Wu Y,
    3. Wang JL,
    4. Lin JS,
    5. Yuan SY,
    6. Li A,
    7. Cui WR
    : Study on the mechanism of epidermal growth factor-induced proliferation of hepatoma cells. World J Gastroenterol 9(2): 271-275, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Breuhahn K,
    2. Longerich T,
    3. Schirmacher P
    : Dysregulation of growth factor signaling in human hepatocellular. Oncogene 25: 3787-3800, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Quaranta M,
    2. Divella R,
    3. Daniele A,
    4. Di Tardo S,
    5. Venneri MT,
    6. Lolli I,
    7. Troccoli G
    : Epidermal growth factor receptor serum levels and prognostic value in malignant gliomas. Tumori 93: 275-280, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Sasaki H,
    2. Yukive H,
    3. Mizuno K
    : Elevated serum epidermal growth factor receptor levels is correlated with lymph node metastasis in lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 8: 79-82, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zampino MG,
    2. Magni E,
    3. Santoro L,
    4. Zorzino L,
    5. Dell'Orto P,
    6. Sonzogni A,
    7. Fazio N,
    8. Monfardini L,
    9. Chiappa A,
    10. Biffi R,
    11. de Braud F
    : Epidermal growth factor receptor serum (sEGFR) level may predict response in patients with EGFR-positive advanced colorectal cancer treated with gefitinib. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 63(1): 139-148, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Nannini M,
    2. Pantaleo MA,
    3. Paterini P,
    4. Piazzi G,
    5. Ceccarelli C,
    6. La Rovere S,
    7. Maleddu A,
    8. Biasco G
    : Molecular detection of epidermal growth factor receptor in colorectal cancer: Does it still make sense? Colorectal Dis 13(5): 542-548, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Pitteri SJ,
    2. Amon LM,
    3. Busald Buson T,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Johnson MM,
    6. Chin A,
    7. Kennedy J,
    8. Wong CH,
    9. Zhang Q,
    10. Wang H,
    11. Lampe PD,
    12. Prentice RL,
    13. McIntosh MW,
    14. Hanash SM,
    15. Li CI
    : Detection of elevated plasma levels of epidermal growth factor receptor before breast cancer diagnosis among hormone therapy users. Cancer Res 70(21): 8598-806, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. El-Houseini ME,
    2. Mohammed MS,
    3. Elshemey WM,
    4. Hussein T,
    5. Desouhy Os,
    6. Elsayed A
    : Enhanced detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Control 12(4): 248-253, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gotoh M,
    2. Nakatani T,
    3. Masuda T,
    4. Mizuguchi Y,
    5. Sakamoto M,
    6. Tsuchiya R,
    7. Kato H
    : Prediction of invasive activities in hepatocellular carcinomas with special reference to alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin. Jpn J Clin Oncol 33(10): 522-526, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Dong ZZ,
    2. Yao DF,
    3. Yao M,
    4. Qiu LW,
    5. Zong L,
    6. Wu W,
    7. Wu XH,
    8. Yao DB,
    9. Meng XY
    : Clinical impact of plasma TGF-beta1 and circulating TGF-beta1 mRNA in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 7(3): 288-295, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Okumoto K,
    2. Hattori E,
    3. Tamura K,
    4. Kiso S,
    5. Watanabe H,
    6. Saito K,
    7. Saito T,
    8. Togashi H,
    9. Kawata S
    : Possible contribution of circulating transforming growth factor-beta1 to immunity and prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 24(1): 21-28, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Song BC,
    2. Chung YA,
    3. Kim JA,
    4. Choi WB,
    5. Suh DD,
    6. Shin JW,
    7. Lee HC,
    8. Lee YS,
    9. Suh DJ
    : Transforming growth factor-b1 as a useful serologic marker of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 94(1): 175-180, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Biernacka A,
    2. Dobaczewski M,
    3. Frangogiannis NG
    : TGF-β signaling in fibrosis. Growth Factor 29(5): 196-202, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Yamazaki K,
    2. Masugi Y,
    3. Sakamoto M
    : Molecular pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma: altering transforming growth factor-β signaling in hepatocarcinogenesis. Dig Dis 29(3): 284-288, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Matsuzaki K,
    2. Okazaki K
    : Transforming growth factor-beta during carcinogenesis: the shift from epithelial to mesenchymal signaling. J Gastroenterol 41(4): 295-303, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Matsuzaki K
    : Modulation of TGF-beta signaling during progression of chronic liver diseases. Front Biosci 14: 2923-2934, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Taniai E,
    2. Kawai M,
    3. Dewa Y,
    4. Nishimura J,
    5. Harada T,
    6. Saegusa Y,
    7. Matsumoto S,
    8. Takahashi M,
    9. Mitsumori K,
    10. Shibutani M
    : Crosstalk between Pten/Akt2 and Tgf beta signaling involving Egf receptor down-regulation during the tumor promotion process from the early stage in a rat two-stage hepatocarcinogenesis model. Cancer Sci 100(5): 813-820, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Caja L,
    2. Sancho P,
    3. Bertran E,
    4. Fabregat I
    : Dissecting the effect of targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor on TGF-b-induced-apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology 55: 351-358, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Caja L,
    2. Sancho P,
    3. Bertran E,
    4. Ortiz C,
    5. Campbell JS,
    6. Fausto N,
    7. Fabregat I
    : The tyrphostin AG1478 inhibits proliferation and induces death of liver tumor cells through EGF receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms. Biochem Pharmacol 1(82): 1583-1592, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Mazzocca A,
    2. Fransvea E,
    3. Dituri F,
    4. Lupo L,
    5. Antonaci S,
    6. Giannelli G
    : Down-regulation of connective tissue growth factor by inhibition of transforming growth factor beta blocks the tumor-stroma cross-talk and tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 51(2): 523-534, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Zemel R,
    2. Issachar A,
    3. Tur-Kaspa R
    : The role of oncogenic viruses in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis 15(2): 261-279, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Woo HG,
    2. Park ES,
    3. Thorgeirsson SS,
    4. Kim YJ
    : Exploring genomic profiles of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog 50(4): 235-243, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Matsuzaki K,
    2. Murata M,
    3. Yoshida K,
    4. Sekimoto G,
    5. Sakaida N,
    6. Kaibori M,
    7. Kamiyama Y,
    8. Nishizawa M,
    9. Fujisawa J,
    10. Okazaki K,
    11. Seki T
    : Chronic inflammation associated with hepatitis C virus infection perturbs hepatic transforming growth factor beta signaling, promoting cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 46(1): 48-57, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Janczewska-Kazek E,
    2. Marek B,
    3. Kajdaniuk D,
    4. Borgiel-marek H
    : Effect of interferon alpha and ribavirin treatment on serum levels of transforming growth factor-beta1, vascular endothelial growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor in patients with chronic hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol 12: 961-965, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 32 (1)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 32, Issue 1
January 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Circulating Transforming Growth Factor-β and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as Related to Virus Infection in Liver Carcinogenesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Circulating Transforming Growth Factor-β and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as Related to Virus Infection in Liver Carcinogenesis
ROSA DIVELLA, ANTONELLA DANIELE, COSIMO GADALETA, ANTONIO TUFARO, MARIA TERESA VENNERI, ANGELO PARADISO, MICHELE QUARANTA
Anticancer Research Jan 2012, 32 (1) 141-145;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Circulating Transforming Growth Factor-β and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as Related to Virus Infection in Liver Carcinogenesis
ROSA DIVELLA, ANTONELLA DANIELE, COSIMO GADALETA, ANTONIO TUFARO, MARIA TERESA VENNERI, ANGELO PARADISO, MICHELE QUARANTA
Anticancer Research Jan 2012, 32 (1) 141-145;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Opportunities and Challenges for Selected Emerging Technologies in Cancer Epidemiology: Mitochondrial, Epigenomic, Metabolomic, and Telomerase Profiling
  • Knockdown of Receptor-Interacting Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase-2 (RIPK2) Affects EMT-associated Gene Expression in Human Hepatoma Cells
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SOX10 Inhibits T Cell Recognition by Inducing Expression of the Immune Checkpoint Molecule PD-L1 in A375 Melanoma Cells
  • The Application of Static Magnetic Stimulation Reduces Survival of SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells
  • The Prognostic Role of ACO2 in Renal Cell Carcinoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire