Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism during Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Impact on Cancer Outcome

CLIONA C. KIRWAN, GARRY MCDOWELL, CHARLES N. MCCOLLUM and GERARD J. BYRNE
Anticancer Research June 2011, 31 (6) 2383-2388;
CLIONA C. KIRWAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cliona.kirwan@manchester.ac.uk
GARRY MCDOWELL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHARLES N. MCCOLLUM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GERARD J. BYRNE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests that cancer patients who develop venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a poorer outcome than those who do not. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the incidence of the development of VTE in breast cancer patients commencing chemotherapy and the relationship between development of thrombosis and cancer progression and death. Patients and Methods: One hundred and thirty-four breast cancer patients were recruited and followed up prior to chemotherapy and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Duplex ultrasound imaging (DUI) was performed 1 month following commencement of chemotherapy or if patients became symptomatic. Results: Thirteen patients developed VTE. Six patients with advanced breast cancer and seven with early breast cancer developed VTE. Three patients died from VTE; all had advanced breast cancer. In patients with VTE, the 28-day mortality rate was 15%, but in patients with symptomatic VTE, the 28-day mortality was 22%. Development of VTE did not predict for progression by three and six months in advanced breast cancer patients. VTE demonstrated a trend for predicting progression by two years. Using Cox regression survival analysis, there was no survival advantage in those with or without VTE. Conclusion: Although the body of evidence supports a worse prognosis when VTE and cancer coexist as compared to either diagnosis alone, a larger prospective study is required to confirm this and clarify whether any premature death is primarily due to VTE or to more aggressive cancer.

  • Thromoboembolism
  • breast cancer
  • chemotherapy
  • outcome

Published data on the frequency of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during chemotherapy is limited; the majority of published studies focus on chemotherapy during breast cancer. In the absence of chemotherapy, the risk of VTE in early breast cancer is between 0.2% and 0.8% (1-3), rising to 2 to 10% if the patient receives chemotherapy (4-7). The rate of VTE in advanced cancer increases further (8). In patients with advanced breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, as many as 17.6% develop VTE (9). Most reported VTEs occur early in treatment (within the first 3 cycles) (5, 6, 9-11). The rate of VTE during neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not previously been studied.

There is some evidence that cancer patients who develop VTE have a poorer cancer outcome than those who do not (12-15), suggesting that VTE may be a surrogate marker for more aggressive disease.

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the incidence of the development of VTE in breast cancer patients commencing chemotherapy. The relationship between the development of thrombosis and cancer progression and death was also investigated.

Patients and Methods

Patients. Eighty-seven patients with early breast cancer (EBC) after complete surgical resection and commencing adjuvant treatment, 11 with breast cancer (NBC) with large or inflammatory tumours commencing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 36 with advanced breast cancer (ABC) commencing palliative treatment for radiographically proven metastatic disease were recruited.

Protocol. A prospective cohort study was undertaken. Patients were recruited prior to commencing chemotherapy. Clinical and radiological follow-up was at three, six, twelve and twenty-four months. Cancer outcome at each time point was categorised as ‘response’, ‘stable’, ‘progression’ or ‘death’, with response defined as ≥50% decrease in measureable disease (clinical or radiological) and progression defined as ≥25% increase in measureable disease (clinical or radiological). Duplex ultrasound imaging (DUI) was performed one month following the commencement of chemotherapy or if patients became symptomatic.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Age of patients recruited. Results are expressed as mean (range) years.

Inclusion criteria. Women aged over 18 with i) ABC: confirmed metastatic breast cancer prior to commencement of chemotherapy (CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil); FEC (5-fluorouracil, etoposide and cyclophosphamide) or a taxane and/or epirubicin); ii) EBC: newly diagnosed breast carcinoma who have undergone apparently curative surgery and have no clinical or radiological evidence of residual disease but who will undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF and FEC); or iii) NBC: newly diagnosed breast carcinoma, with no clinical or radiological evidence of advanced disease receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to curative surgery (AC (cyclophosphamide and adriamycin) or epirubicin and navelbine), because of large primary tumour size or significant markers of tumour aggression.

Exclusion criteria. Recent surgery (<18 days), or chemotherapy (<2 months), impaired liver or renal function (>50% above upper limit of normal), thrombophilia, anticoagulant therapy (excluding aspirin, clopidogrel), hormone therapy, past history of VTE, WHO performance status ≥3 (16).

Ethical approval. The study was approved by the South Manchester Local Research Ethics Committee and all patients gave written informed consent.

Statistical methods. One-way ANOVA and independent t-tests were used to compare independent samples. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of VTE or disease progression. Cox regression survival analysis was used to assess survival.

Results

Patient demographics. One hundred and thirty-four breast cancer patients were recruited. Of these 36 were ABC, 87 were EBC following curative surgery and 11 were NBC patients undergoing chemotherapy prior to curative surgery. There was a trend for the advanced group to be older than the neoadjuvant group, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.09; Table I).

There was no difference in frequency of oestrogen, progesterone or HER2 receptor positivity between patient groups. More women with ABC were postmenopausal compared to EBC and NBC (Tables II and III).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Receptor positivity (+) and negativity (−) for each patient group.

Prevalence of VTE in ABC versus EBC patients undergoing chemotherapy. Overall, thirteen (10%) patients developed VTE, of whom 9 (7%) were symptomatic. Six out of 36 (17%) ABC patients and seven out of 87 (8%) EBC patients developed VTE. None of the 11 NBC patients developed VTE. The higher rate of VTE in ABC compared to EBC approached significance (p=0.06). Of the patients with symptomatic VTE, 4 out of 36 (11%) were in the ABC group and 5 out of 87 (6%) were in the EBC group

Three (2.2%) out of 13 patients died from VTE; all had advanced breast cancer (8.3%). All three developed VTE within the first three months of commencement of chemotherapy. Survival from entry into the study for these three patients was 55, 66 and 879 days. The former two patients died within 1 and 7 days, respectively, of the development of VTE. The latter patient was found to have a calf vein thrombosis at screening, but died over two years later of pulmonary embolism. Of patients with VTE (symptomatic and screen detected), the 28-day mortality rate was 15%, but of patients with symptomatic VTE, the 28-day mortality was 22%.

Nine out of the 13 (69%) patients that developed VTE did so within the first 3 months of commencing chemotherapy. All six ABC patients who developed VTE did so within 3 months, but only three out of the seven EBC patients developed VTE within 3 months of starting adjuvant chemotherapy.

Ten out of the 13 (77%) VTE events occurred in postmeno-pausal women, however neither age, nor menopausal status was associated with an increased risk of VTE (p=0.2 and 0.2 respectively). Development of VTE in the EBC group did not correlate with the number of days from surgery to commencing chemotherapy (p=0.7).

Cancer outcome. Cancer outcome was categorised into ‘response’, ‘stable’, ‘progression’ and ‘death’ at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months (Table IV).

Development of VTE did not predict for progression by 3 and 6 months in ABC patients (p=0.17 and 0.15 respectively). VTE demonstrated a trend for predicting progression by two years (p=0.08 for EBC patients and p=0.07 for all cancer patients on logistic regression). Using Cox regression survival analysis there was no survival advantage for those with or without VTE (p=0.4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Numbers of pre- and postmenopausal women in each patient group. The ratio of pre- to postmenopausal women in advanced breast cancer is compared to the ratio of pre- to post menopausal women in other groups (Chi-squared).

Discussion

Prevalence of VTE in advanced versus early breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The rate of VTE during chemotherapy in both the EBC and ABC groups in this study concurs with much of the current literature (4-7, 9). Despite difficulties with recruitment within the limitations of study time, we were able to confirm the previously quoted literature on the rate of VTE, and the increased rate that occurs in ABC compared to EBC. In accordance with much of the previous literature, 69% (9 out of 13) of the VTEs in this current study occurred within three months of commencing chemotherapy (5, 6, 9-11). However, in a recent study of 381 breast and gastrointestinal patients commencing chemotherapy, the mean time to VTE (occurring in 30 patients) was four months (7). Although many studies with VTE as an endpoint use venography to screen for deep vein thrombosis, we used DUI. The quality of imaging in our unit is extremely high, with a high rate for identifying even asymptomatic VTE. This non-invasive test allowed increased patient compliance and is well recognised as a screening tool for VTE (17-19).

Saphner et al. reported a 0.8% (4 out of 471) VTE rate in premenopausal women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (3). Weiss et al. prospectively reported a 5% (22 out of 433) VTE rate in node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (6). Both studies relied on clinical presentation (either as an emergency by the patient or by examination at follow-up by the physician), rather than screen detection. A 9% (9 out of 102) and 10% (5 out of 50) VTE rate in node-positive, EBC patients receiving chemotherapy, as detected by impedence plethysmography and DUI screening, was found by Levine et al. (4) and von Templehoff et al. (5) respectively. The more recent study of Mandala et al. reported a 8.8% (16 out of 182) rate of symptomatic VTE in consecutive breast cancer patients commencing adjuvant chemotherapy (7). This increased rate of symptomatic VTE compared to older studies may reflect an increased awareness of the symptoms of deep vein thrombosis amongst patients as a result of media focus on flight-related thrombosis. Levine et al.'s 1994 study of ABC patients receiving chemotherapy and randomised to warfarin or no treatment reported a VTE rate of only 4.4% (20). In their study however, VTE screening was by clinical methods only. Patients recruited to the study had already commenced chemotherapy, and so those patients developing VTE early in response to chemotherapy would have been excluded. As this appears to be the majority of patients (5, 6, 9-11) this biases the recruited population to a low risk group. A more recent study of vinorelbine, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in ABC patients reports an 8% (8 out of 100) symptomatic VTE rate (21). This present study is not empowered to confirm the previously quoted VTE mortality in EBC of 0.2-0.5% (6, 22), however, with a mortality rate of 8%, it does confirm Goodnough et al.'s finding of a 7% VTE mortality rate during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer (9).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Response to treatment. Results show the number of patients that had radiological or clinical cancer progression or response within three to twenty-four months. The cumulative number of patient deaths (either from VTE or cancer) is reported in the fifth column. The cumulative number of patients developing VTE in each group is reported in brackets, with total numbers reported in the last column.

The 28-day mortality rate for symptomatic VTE of 22% is similar to that reported by Cushman et al.'s cohort study, where a 28-day fatality rate after first time VTE of 11% was found, but this increased to 25% for cancer-associated thrombosis (23). Due to limited availability of eligible patients, and hence low recruitment, this study has insufficient numbers to assess the risk of VTE in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Some authors reported an increased risk of thrombosis amongst postmenopausal women (3, 6, 22), however, an association was not demonstrated in this study. Saphner et al. (3) demonstrated oestrogen receptor positivity as a risk factor for chemotherapy induced VTE however this is not supported by Levine et al. (4), Clahsen et al. (22) or indeed the present study. This implies that Saphner et al.'s findings may have been due to chance.

In malignancy, haemostatic markers of coagulation are raised for several weeks after surgery (24, 25). A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study of cancer patients undergoing abdominal surgery compared prolonged (four-week) VTE prophylaxis with the standard one-week regimen. There was a 60% reduction in the relative risk of VTE in patients receiving prolonged prophylaxis (4.8% versus 12%, p=0.02) (26). These results have been supported by further meta-analysis (27). Reducing the interval between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy by administering chemotherapy within 36 hours of mastectomy has been shown to prolong disease-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients (28), however the impact on hypercoagulability of a further treatment in already recovering and inactive patients has yet to be established. In this study, there is no demonstrable added risk for VTE by commencing chemotherapy shortly after surgery. One potential weakness of this current study is that screening for VTE was not performed prior to commencement of chemotherapy. Identified thrombi could have been pre-existing and therefore be the result of the cancer, or in the case of the EBC patients, a result of surgery. This, however, increases the significance of the greater VTE rate in patients with high tumour load (advanced breast cancer).

It is recognised that these two study groups, EBC and ABC, are heterogeneous for chemotherapy type. It is also recognised that the ABC patients are heterogeneous for their site of metastatic disease.

Does development of VTE predict for a worse cancer outcome? Previous research has shown that patients who develop VTE have a worse cancer outcome than those that remain free of VTE complications (13, 14, 29-31). However, to date, all studies have been retrospective. Both Seward et al. and Morgan et al. studied medical records of cancer patients presenting with VTE at major medical centres. Seward et al. found that cancer patients who developed VTE had a worse prognosis than those who remained free of VTE, but failed to account for more minor VTE that may have presented to smaller district hospitals, and thus not included in the data collection (31). Morgan reported a significantly reduced survival time if cancer presented concurrently with VTE compared to a matched control group without VTE (p<0.001) (13). Chew et al. highlight the increased rate of VTE within the first year of cancer diagnosis, however this may reflect intensity of treatments following a new diagnosis, with many cancer treatments including surgery, radiotherapy, hormone therapy as well as chemotherapy recognised as risk-factors for VTE (32, 33). Sorensen et al.'s retrospective study of the National Registry acknowledges that VTE occurs more commonly in patients with more advanced disease compared to those with early cancer. This may contribute to the reduced survival in patients with VTE in cancer, seen in this study, and hence biased survival analysis (29). Levitan et al.'s study of Medicar records, although finding a significantly reduced survival in patients presenting with concurrent VTE, compared to cancer alone, has a similar limitation (30). However, Chew et al.'s retrospective review of breast cancer patients hospitalised with VTE between 1993 and 1995 reports VTE as a significant risk factor for death, even when cancer is stratified for stage (15). The increased VTE rate in advanced cancer is supported in the present study. Interestingly in Weiss et al.'s observational study of EBC patients commencing adjuvant chemotherapy, 35% (7 out of 20) of those with VTE developed recurrence of their breast cancer within two years, compared to 15% for the entire group of patients in the study (65 out of 433). Statistical significance was not reported (6). A recent study of cancer patients incidentally diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, on staging computed tomography, compared to symptomatic patients (matched for cancer type and stage) reported no difference in mortality (34).

The current study suggests that development of VTE may predict for cancer progression. VTE within 3 months following chemotherapy suggests a poorer outcome (p=0.07). However, with cancer progression occurring in 61% of the ABC group and none of the EBC group at 3 months, and 89% and only 7% respectively by 2 years, any analysis is complicated by strong covariates.

Although the body of evidence supports a worse prognosis when VTE and cancer coexist as compared to that with either diagnosis alone, a larger prospective study is required to confirm this and clarify whether any premature death is primarily due to VTE or to more aggressive cancer.

  • Received May 9, 2011.
  • Revision received May 26, 2011.
  • Accepted May 30, 2011.
  • Copyright© 2011 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Andtbacka RH,
    2. Babiera G,
    3. Singletary SE,
    4. Hunt KK,
    5. Meric-Bernstam F,
    6. Feig BW,
    7. Ames FC,
    8. Ross MI,
    9. Dejesus Y,
    10. Kuerer HM
    : Incidence and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery and treated according to clinical pathways. Ann Surg 243(1): 96-101, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lee AY,
    2. Levine MN
    : The thrombophilic state induced by therapeutic agents in the cancer patient. Semin Thromb Hemost 25(2): 137-145, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Saphner T,
    2. Tormey DC,
    3. Gray R
    : Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients who received adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 9(2): 286-294, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. ↵
    1. Levine MN,
    2. Gent M,
    3. Hirsh J,
    4. Arnold A,
    5. Goodyear MD,
    6. Hryniuk W,
    7. De Pauw S
    : The thrombogenic effect of anticancer drug therapy in women with stage II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 318(7): 404-407, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. von Tempelhoff GF,
    2. Dietrich M,
    3. Hommel G,
    4. Heilmann L
    : Blood coagulation during adjuvant epirubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in patients with primary operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14(9): 2560-2568, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    1. Weiss RB,
    2. Tormey DC,
    3. Holland JF,
    4. Weinberg VE
    : Venous thrombosis during multimodal treatment of primary breast carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rep 65(7-8): 677-679, 1981.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Mandala M,
    2. Barni S,
    3. Prins M,
    4. Labianca R,
    5. Tondini C,
    6. Russo L,
    7. Milesi A,
    8. Cremonesi M,
    9. Zaccanelli M,
    10. Regonesi C,
    11. Moro C,
    12. Falanga A
    : Acquired and inherited risk factors for developing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective trial. Ann Oncol 21(4): 871-876, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hall IE,
    2. Andersen MS,
    3. Krumholz HM,
    4. Gross CP
    : Predictors of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced common solid cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol 2009: 182521, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Goodnough LT,
    2. Saito H,
    3. Manni A,
    4. Jones PK,
    5. Pearson OH
    : Increased incidence of thromboembolism in stage IV breast cancer patients treated with a five-drug chemotherapy regimen. A study of 159 patients. Cancer 54(7): 1264-1268, 1984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fotopoulou C,
    2. duBois A,
    3. Karavas AN,
    4. Trappe R,
    5. Aminossadati B,
    6. Schmalfeldt B,
    7. Pfisterer J,
    8. Sehouli J
    : Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing platinum/paclitaxel-containing first-line chemotherapy: an exploratory analysis by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 26(16): 2683-2689, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Pritchard KI,
    2. Paterson AH,
    3. Paul NA,
    4. Zee B,
    5. Fine S,
    6. Pater J
    : Increased thromboembolic complications with concurrent tamoxifen and chemotherapy in a randomized trial of adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Breast Cancer Site Group. J Clin Oncol 14(10): 2731-2737, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Sandhu R,
    2. Pan CX,
    3. Wun T,
    4. Harvey D,
    5. Zhou H,
    6. White RH,
    7. Chew HK
    : The incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with primary bladder cancer. Cancer 116(11): 2596-2603, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Morgan MA,
    2. Iyengar TD,
    3. Napiorkowski BE,
    4. Rubin SC,
    5. Mikuta JJ
    : The clinical course of deep vein thrombosis in patients with gynecologic cancer. Gynecol Oncol 84(1): 67-71, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chew HK,
    2. Wun T,
    3. Harvey D,
    4. Zhou H,
    5. White RH
    : Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers. Arch Intern Med 166(4): 458-464, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Chew HK,
    2. Wun T,
    3. Harvey DJ,
    4. Zhou H,
    5. White RH
    : Incidence of venous thromboembolism and the impact on survival in breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 25(1): 70-76, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Oken MM,
    2. Creech RH,
    3. Tormey DC,
    4. Horton J,
    5. Davis TE,
    6. McFadden ET,
    7. Carbone PP
    : Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6): 649-655, 1982.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bressollette L,
    2. Nonent M,
    3. Oger E,
    4. Garcia JF,
    5. Larroche P,
    6. Guias B,
    7. Scarabin PY,
    8. Mottier D
    : Diagnostic accuracy of compression ultrasonography for the detection of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in medical patients – the TADEUS project. Thromb Haemost 86(2): 529-533, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Elias A,
    2. Cadene A,
    3. Elias M,
    4. Puget J,
    5. Tricoire JL,
    6. Colin C,
    7. Lefebvre D,
    8. Rousseau H,
    9. Joffre F
    : Extended lower limb venous ultrasound for the diagnosis of proximal and distal vein thrombosis in asymptomatic patients after total hip replacement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27(4): 438-444, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Kassai B,
    2. Boissel JP,
    3. Cucherat M,
    4. Sonie S,
    5. Shah NR,
    6. Leizorovicz A
    : A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients. Thromb Haemost 91(4): 655-666, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Levine M,
    2. Hirsh J,
    3. Gent M,
    4. Arnold A,
    5. Warr D,
    6. Falanga A,
    7. Samosh M,
    8. Bramwell V,
    9. Pritchard KI,
    10. Stewart D,
    11. Goodwin P
    : Double-blind randomised trial of a very-low-dose warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in stage IV breast cancer. Lancet 343(8902): 886-889, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Nolè F,
    2. Munzone E,
    3. Mandala M,
    4. Catania C,
    5. Orlando L,
    6. Zampino MG,
    7. Minchella I,
    8. Colleoni M,
    9. Peruzzotti G,
    10. Marrocco E,
    11. Goldhirsch A
    : Vinorelbine, cisplatin and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (ViFuP) in metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study. Ann Oncol 12(1): 95-100, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Clahsen PC,
    2. van de Velde CJ,
    3. Julien JP,
    4. Floiras JL,
    5. Mignolet FY
    : Thromboembolic complications after perioperative chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group study. J Clin Oncol 12(6): 1266-1271, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Cushman M,
    2. Tsai AW,
    3. White RH,
    4. Heckbert SR,
    5. Rosamond WD,
    6. Enright P,
    7. Folsom AR
    : Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in two cohorts: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Am J Med 117(1): 19-25, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Oberhoff C,
    2. Rollwagen C,
    3. Tauchert AM,
    4. Hoffmann O,
    5. Winkler UH,
    6. Schindler AE
    : Perioperative development of a thrombogenic risk profile in patients with carcinomas of the breast: a cause of increased thrombosis. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 21(6): 560-568, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Rasmussen MS
    : Preventing thromboembolic complications in cancer patients after surgery: a role for prolonged thromboprophylaxis. Cancer Treat Rev 28(3): 141-144, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Bergqvist D,
    2. Agnelli G,
    3. Cohen AT,
    4. Eldor A,
    5. Nilsson PE,
    6. Le Moigne-Amrani A,
    7. Dietrich-Neto F
    : Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. N Engl J Med 346(13): 975-980, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Rasmussen MS
    : Does prolonged thromboprophylaxis improve outcome in patients undergoing surgery? Cancer Treat Rev 29(Suppl 2): 15-17, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group
    : Prolonged disease-free survival after one course of perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy for node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 320(8): 491-496, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Sorensen HT,
    2. Mellemkjaer L,
    3. Olsen JH,
    4. Baron JA
    : Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 343(25): 1846-1850, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Levitan N,
    2. Dowlati A,
    3. Remick SC,
    4. Tahsildar HI,
    5. Sivinski LD,
    6. Beyth R,
    7. Rimm AA
    : Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data. Medicine (Baltimore) 78(5): 285-291, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Seward J,
    2. Byrne GJ,
    3. Howell A,
    4. Bundred NJ,
    5. McCollum CN
    : Does cytotoxic chemotherapy precipitate venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer? Breast Cancer ResTreat 57: 57, 1999.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Lyman GH
    : Venous thromboembolism in the patient with cancer: focus on burden of disease and benefits of thromboprophylaxis. Cancer 117(7): 1334-1349, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Blom JW,
    2. Osanto S,
    3. Rosendaal FR
    : The risk of a venous thrombotic event in lung cancer patients: higher risk for adenocarcinoma than squamous cell carcinoma. J Thromb Haemost 2(10): 1760-1765, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. den Exter PL,
    2. Hooijer J,
    3. Dekkers OM,
    4. Huisman MV
    : Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism and mortality in patients with cancer incidentally diagnosed with pulmonary embolism: A comparison with symptomatic patients. J Clin Oncol, 2011.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 31 (6)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 31, Issue 6
June 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism during Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Impact on Cancer Outcome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism during Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Impact on Cancer Outcome
CLIONA C. KIRWAN, GARRY MCDOWELL, CHARLES N. MCCOLLUM, GERARD J. BYRNE
Anticancer Research Jun 2011, 31 (6) 2383-2388;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism during Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Impact on Cancer Outcome
CLIONA C. KIRWAN, GARRY MCDOWELL, CHARLES N. MCCOLLUM, GERARD J. BYRNE
Anticancer Research Jun 2011, 31 (6) 2383-2388;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • When are breast cancer patients at highest risk of venous thromboembolism? A cohort study using English health care data
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Bone Toxicity Case Report Combining Encorafenib, Cetuximab and WNT974 in a Phase I Trial
  • Assessment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain Among Female Patients With Cancer: Knowledge, Management and Characterization in the IOPS-MS Study
  • Low-dose Apalutamide in Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Case Series
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire