Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Prognostic Impact of CD133 Immunoexpression in Node-negative Invasive Breast Carcinomas

A. IENI, G. GIUFFRÈ, V. ADAMO and G. TUCCARI
Anticancer Research April 2011, 31 (4) 1315-1320;
A. IENI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. GIUFFRÈ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. ADAMO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. TUCCARI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tuccari{at}unime.it
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) are able to prepare the site for incoming neoplastic cells. Among different markers of HPCs, which one should be considered the most efficient was investigated. Patients and Methods: Five hundred and seventy-nine non-metastatic lymph nodes from 49 patients affected by invasive breast cancer were submitted to an immunohistochemical comparative analysis of hematopoietic (CD34), endothelial (CD133), mesenchymal (CD117) progenitors and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1, also known as Flt1). The cases with an intensity-distribution score >3 were considered as high HPC expressors. Survival univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Fifteen out of the 49 patients were recorded as HPC high expressors based on the immunohistochemical VEGFR1 staining. A highly significant relationship was found between high HPC immunoexpression and the development of distant metastasis as well as the occurrence of bone localization (p<0.001). By univariate analysis, CD133 showed a highly significant value regarding metastatic localizations in the bone; by multivariate analysis, CD133 emerged as the only independent prognostic variable. Conclusion: CD133 expression shows a potential predictive role, thus representing a helpful tool for the management of breast cancer.

  • Breast cancer
  • stem cells
  • pre-metastatic niche
  • metastasis
  • CD133
  • prognosis

The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying selective organ tropism of different cancer types and site-specific metastases are relatively unknown (1). In metastatic spread, breast cancer (BC) displays organ specificity with a particular affinity to target and proliferate in lymph nodes, lung, bone, liver and brain (2-4). Several models have been developed to explain the biological complexity of metastasis in BC (5), but none of the proposed models can yet fully explain the dissemination to distant organs (6-8). At the time of diagnosis, breast tumor cells have often already been disseminated from the primary site and can be detected in the bone marrow (9, 10), where hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) are also resident. BC utilizes the regional lymph nodes as the first step of metastasis (4, 11, 12) and axillary lymph node involvement has been considered one of the major relevant factors in clinical management and is directly correlated with final outcome (4, 13, 14). However, about 20% of patients affected by node-negative BC soon to develop metastases (4, 13, 14). In recent years, employing transplantable syngeneic mouse tumors able to form organ-specific metastases, the earliest steps in this process have been investigated and vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated crosstalk between tumor cells and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1 also known as Flt-1)-expressing bone marrow-derived HPCs has been suggested (15). The initial interaction leads to the recruitment of HPCs in target organs, potentially sites of metastases, and the recruited HPCs are considered able to prepare a permissive ‘nest’ for incoming neoplastic cells (15). In order to reveal the cellular clusters that maintain their progenitor cell status at the pre-metastatic sites, VEGFR1 has been utilized a functional marker, even though it has also been detected in other normal cell types (6, 16, 17), as well as in neoplastic cells from melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, prostate carcinoma and BC (18-21). Subsets of VEGFR1+ HPCs have been found to co-express stem/progenitor cell antigens such as hematopoietic (CD34), endothelial (CD133), mesenchymal (CD117) antigens (15). There remains a lack of agreement among pathologists and oncologists as to the best method for identifying HPCs. In order to verify among the different markers of HPCs which should be considered the most effective at identifying the first step of metastatic spread in BC, a large series of axillary negative lymph nodes, taken at surgery from patients affected by invasive carcinomas, were analyzed immunohistochemically.

Patients and Methods

Five hundred and seventy-nine non-metastatic lymph nodes were obtained from 49 patients (mean age 61.8; age range 41-85 years), surgically treated for invasive BC in the period 1998-2007. Data concerning follow-up were available and causes of death were obtained from city registry offices. Immunocytochemical data concerning sex steroid hormone receptors for estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status as well as growth fraction (Ki-67 labeling index, LI) were also available. All the samples had been fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 12-72 h and embedded in paraffin at 56°C. From each tissue block, 4-μm-thick serial sections were cut and mounted on silane-coated glass, then dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanols. Antigen retrieval, by heating slides placed in 0.01 M citrate buffer pH 6.0 in a microwave oven for 3 cycles × 5 min, was performed before adding primary antibody. For the immunohistochemical study, the sections were treated in a moist chamber: with 0.1% H2O2 in methanol to block the intrinsic peroxidase activity (30 min at RT); with normal sheep serum to prevent nonspecific adherence of serum proteins (30 min at RT); with rabbit polyclonal anti-human antisera AC133 (CD133) (Abgent, San Diego, CA, USA; w.d. 1:80), CD117 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark; diluted 1:500), Flt-1 (VEGFR1) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany; diluted 1:400) or with mouse monoclonal anti-human antiserum CD34 (Dako; diluted 1:50) for 16 h at 4°C; with sheep anti-rabbit or mouse immunoglobulin antiserum (Behring Institute, Scoppito-L'Aquila, Italy; diluted 1:25) for 30 min at RT and with rabbit or mouse anti-horseradish peroxidase-antiperoxidase complexes (Dako; diluted 1:25) for 30 min at RT. For the demonstration of peroxidase activity the sections were incubated in darkness for 10 min with 3-3’ diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) 100 mg in 200 ml 0.03% hydrogen peroxide in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The nuclear counterstaining was performed with Mayer's hemalum. Negative controls included omission of the primary antiserum and replacement of the primary antiserum with PBS solution (pH 7.4) or normal horse/goat serum; in each of these conditions, no staining was evident. Two histological sections of capillary hemangioma/hemangioblastoma were utilized as positive controls for each marker such as VEGFR1, CD133 and CD34, while one section of gastrointestinal stromal tumors was used as positive control for CD117 antiserum.

Two pathologists using a double-headed microscope performed the assessment of immunostained sections on a consensus basis, blinded to the clinicopathological data. Immunostained sections were estimated by light microscopy using a ×40 objective lens and ×10 eyepiece. The quantification of immunostained HPC aggregates (2-5 cells) was performed for each marker on three different areas: a value of 1 or 2 was assigned to the case with <3 or ≥3 HPC aggregates respectively, the intensity of immunostaining was also taken into consideration (weak=1; moderate=2; strong=3). An intensity-distribution score (ID score) was calculated for each antiserum, by multiplying the value of the HPC aggregates and the staining intensity; cases with an ID score >3 were considered as high expressors.

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and efficiency (expressed as a result as percentage of what ideally could be expected, hence with 100% as ideal case) of each immunohistochemical marker of HPC were evaluated using dichotomous values (high, low) taking the metastatic status of the patients as the reference.

Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method utilizing HPC immunoexpression as a strata variable; in this way, disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated. To compare the survival curves of different groups of patients, the Mantel-Cox log-rank test was applied. A multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) was utilized to determine the independent effect of each resulting variable on DFS. In particular, a forward stepwise procedure and likelihood ratio tests were used to select the variables included in the final model. An estimation of the relative risk with 95% confidence interval was computed. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

The follow-up time of patients ranged from 6 to 136 months (mean 64.3 months); twenty patients showed progression of disease with the appearance of bone metastases in 14 cases. Twenty-nine patients were alive without disease or censored.

Adequate immunostaining quality was evident in all the lymph node samples, although the immunohistochemical expression of the utilized antisera was heterogeneous. Generally, the stained cells present in the lymph nodes were arranged in small groups (2-5 cells) with some isolated ones (Figure 1).

Utilizing the VEGFR1 antiserum, 15/49 (30.6%) patients with BC were recorded as HPC high expressors having an ID score more than 3. With CD133, CD34 and CD117 17/49 (34.7%), 24/49 (49.0%) and 23/49 (46.9%), respectively were high expressors. For each antiserum utilized, a highly significant relationship was found between high HPC immunoexpression and the development of distant metastases, as well as the occurrence of bone localization (p<0.001).

Among the HPC markers, VEGFR1 and CD133 exhibited the greatest specificity (both 93.1%), while CD34 was characterized by highest sensitivity (85.0%). The highest positive predictive value was obtained by CD133 immunostaining (88.2%); the highest negative predictive value was attributable to CD34 (88.0%). CD 133 showed the highest efficiency value (85.7%). Table I shows the analytical data concerning each immunomarker.

The univariate analysis relative to DFS in the BC patients for all the considered markers able to identify the HPCs are shown in Table II; a highly significant p-value was obtained for each immunomarker. However, by Cox multivariate analysis, only CD133 emerged as an independent prognostic variable for the BC patients (Table III).

The relationships between the clinico-pathological characteristics as well as the biomolecular data of BC and HPC status for each antiserum are reported in Table IV. A significant correlation was recorded between Ki-67 LI as well as HER2 status and the immunohistochemical data concerning the VEGFR1, CD133 and CD117 antisera values, while a tendency towards a statistically significant p-value was obtained with the CD34 antiserum. No significant relationships were found between the HPC immunohistochemical data and age, histotype, tumor grade or stage and ER data, although a significant correlation between PR data and immunoexpression of VEGFR1 and CD133 was found.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Scattered or small group HPC elements immunohistochemically revealed in lymph nodes by CD117, VEGFR-1, CD34 and CD133 staining (immunoperoxidase, Mayer's hemalum counterstain, ×400).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and efficiency of each immunohistochemical marker of HPCs evaluated taking as reference the presence of distant metastases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Immunohistochemical markers of HPCs in patients with invasive BC: a univariate analysis of disease-free survival by Mantel-Cox log-rank test.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Multivariate survival analysis by Cox regression model in invasive BC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Clinicopathological and biomolecular data with corresponding immunohistochemical markers of HPCs in patients with invasive BC.

Discussion

VEGFR1 has been revealed on subsets of epithelial tumor cells in invasive ductal carcinomas, as well as on tumor vascular endothelium and myoepithelial cells, suggesting an immunohistochemical profile indicative of malignant phenotype in breast carcinoma (23). Although VEGFR1 exhibited high specificity for HPC, in the present study it was not the most efficient marker.

Normal non-hematopoietic human tissues such as breast epithelia, parotid and dermal sweat glands, melanocytes, central nervous system, placenta, interstitial cells of the testes and ovaries express CD117 (c-KIT) (23-25); furthermore, CD117 has also been documented in small cell lung cancer, breast carcinoma and melanoma (26-28). In general, the expression of CD117 during hematopoietic development is highest at the early stages and then diminishing with maturation (25); moreover, up to 60-70% of CD34+ bone-marrow progenitor cells co-express CD-117 (25, 29).

CD34 has been widely used as a marker of vascular endothelial cells and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (30-32). Although more recently CD34 has been considered a useful tool for stem-progenitor cell characterization (33), its function has not yet been definitively determined. It has been proposed that CD34 promotes proliferation and blocks differentiation of stem or progenitor cells (34). Moreover, by flow cytometry, Mehra et al. (35) showed that hematopoietic marker CD34 was co-expressed in 85% of cells which exhibited a positivity for CD133, already considered as a cell surface marker of adult stem cells (36). In hematopoietic lineages in man, CD133 antigen expression is restricted to CD34+ cells, although CD133 transcripts have been found in many human cell lines and differentiated cells (37, 38). Furthermore, CD133 expression has been found to correlated with patient survival in early colorectal carcinoma (39, 40), may play an important role in the evolution of gastric carcinoma, and should be considered as a potential prognostic marker (41, 42).

CD133 showed the greatest efficiency in the present study, it may be considered the most useful immunomorphological indicator for identifying HPCs, showing a potentially positive predictive role for analyzing the risk of metastasis in BC. Additionally, in the multivariate analysis, CD133 emerged as the exclusive independent prognostic value in pN0 BC patients. Bone involvement has also been related to high CD133 levels in peripheral blood and in patients with bone metastases, high CD133 mRNA expression was significantly and independently related to survival (35). However, the present data concerning the CD133 immunoexpression in pN0 BC patients showed a highly significant value regarding bone metastasis only by univariate analysis. Finally, in the present study, no significant relationship was found between the HPC immunohistochemical data and age, histotype, tumor grade or stage and hormone receptor expression. On the other hand, a significant correlation was recorded between Ki-67 LI, as well as HER2 status and CD133 immunoexpression, and well as VGFR1 and CD117 antisera, revealing an interesting relationship between well-known predictive parameters of poor clinical course in BC and the detection of HPCs. Therefore, we contend that the identification of HPCs in pN0 BC, in particular as recognized by CD133 for its intrinsic independent prognostic relevance, may represent an additional useful tool to predict the clinical behavior as well as indicating the management of breast carcinomas.

  • Received January 10, 2011.
  • Revision received March 28, 2011.
  • Accepted March 28, 2011.
  • Copyright© 2011 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lawson JC,
    2. Blatch GL,
    3. Edkins AL
    : Cancer stem cells in breast cancer and metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118: 241-254, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Kang Y,
    2. Siegel PM,
    3. Shu W,
    4. Drobnjak M,
    5. Kakonen SM,
    6. Cordón-Cardo C,
    7. Guise TA,
    8. Massagué J
    : A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell 3: 537-549, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Del Mastro L,
    2. Clavarezza M,
    3. Venturini M
    : Reducing the risk of distant metastases in breast cancer patients: role of aromatase inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev 33: 681-687, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Eccles S,
    2. Paon L,
    3. Sleeman J
    : Lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer: importance and new insights into cellular and molecular mechanisms. Clin Exp Metastasis 24: 619-636, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Hunter KW,
    2. Crawford NP,
    3. Alsarraj J
    : Mechanisms of metastasis. Breast Cancer Res 10(Suppl 1): S2, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Ishida A,
    2. Murray J,
    3. Saito Y,
    4. Kanthou C,
    5. Benzakour O,
    6. Shibuya M,
    7. Wijelath ES
    : Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in smooth muscle cells. J Cell Physiol 188: 359-368, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kaplan RN,
    2. Psaila B,
    3. Lyden D
    : Bone marrow cells in the ‘pre-metastatic niche’: within bone and beyond. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25: 521-529, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Geiger TR,
    2. Peeper DS
    : Metastasis mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1796: 293-308, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hüsemann Y,
    2. Geigl JB,
    3. Schubert F,
    4. Musiani P,
    5. Meyer M,
    6. Burghart E,
    7. Forni G,
    8. Eils R,
    9. Fehm T,
    10. Riethmüller G,
    11. Klein CA
    : Systemic spread is an early step in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 13: 58-68, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Pantel K,
    2. Brakenhoff RH,
    3. Brandt B
    : Detection, clinical relevance and specific biological properties of disseminating tumour cells. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 329-340, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Harris JR,
    2. Lippman ME,
    3. Morrow M,
    4. Hellman S
    : Diseases of Breast Cancer. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1996.
  10. ↵
    1. Sleeman JP
    : The lymph node as a bridgehead in the metastatic dissemination of tumors. Recent Results Cancer Res 157: 55-81, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Goldhirsch A,
    2. Glick JH,
    3. Gelber RD,
    4. Coates AS,
    5. Senn HJ
    : Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 19: 3817-3827, 2001.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Leong SP
    : Paradigm shift of staging and treatment for early breast cancer in the sentinel lymph node era. Breast J 12: S128-133, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kaplan RN,
    2. Riba RD,
    3. Zacharoulis S,
    4. Bramley AH,
    5. Vincent L,
    6. Costa C,
    7. MacDonald DD,
    8. Jin DK,
    9. Shido K,
    10. Kerns SA,
    11. Zhu Z,
    12. Hicklin D,
    13. Wu Y,
    14. Port JL,
    15. Altorki N,
    16. Port ER,
    17. Ruggero D,
    18. Shmelkov SV,
    19. Jensen KK,
    20. Rafii S,
    21. Lyden D
    : VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature 438: 820-827, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Lyden D,
    2. Hattori K,
    3. Dias S,
    4. Costa C,
    5. Blaikie P,
    6. Butros L,
    7. Chadburn A,
    8. Heissig B,
    9. Marks W,
    10. Witte L,
    11. Wu Y,
    12. Hicklin D,
    13. Zhu Z,
    14. Hackett NR,
    15. Crystal RG,
    16. Moore MA,
    17. Hajjar KA,
    18. Manova K,
    19. Benezra R,
    20. Rafii S
    : Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow-derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth. Nat Med 7: 1194-1201, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Sawano A,
    2. Iwai S,
    3. Sakurai Y,
    4. Ito M,
    5. Shitara K,
    6. Nakahata T,
    7. Shibuya M
    : Flt-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, is a novel cell surface marker for the lineage of monocyte-macrophages in humans. Blood 97: 785-791, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Decaussin M,
    2. Sartelet H,
    3. Robert C,
    4. Moro D,
    5. Claraz C,
    6. Brambilla C,
    7. Brambilla E
    : Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its two receptors (VEGF-R1-Flt1 and VEGF-R2-Flk1/KDR) in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs): correlation with angiogenesis and survival. J Pathol 188: 369-377, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ferrer FA,
    2. Miller LJ,
    3. Lindquist R,
    4. Kowalczyk P,
    5. Laudone VP,
    6. Albertsen PC,
    7. Kreutzer DL
    : Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in human prostate cancer. Urology 54: 567-572, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lacal PM,
    2. Ruffini F,
    3. Pagani E,
    4. D'Atri S
    : An autocrine loop directed by the vascular endothelial growth factor promotes invasiveness of human melanoma cells. Int J Oncol 27: 1625-1632, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Price DJ,
    2. Miralem T,
    3. Jiang S,
    4. Steinberg R,
    5. Avraham H
    : Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the stimulation of cellular invasion and signaling of breast cancer cells. Cell Growth Differ 12: 129-135, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Hooper AT,
    3. Zhong Z,
    4. Witte L,
    5. Bohlen P,
    6. Rafii S,
    7. Hicklin DJ
    : The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR-1) supports growth and survival of human breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 119: 1519-1529, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Lammie A,
    2. Drobnjak M,
    3. Gerald W,
    4. Saad A,
    5. Cote R,
    6. Cordon-Cardo C
    : Expression of c-KIT and KIT ligand proteins in normal human tissues. J Histochem Cytochem 42: 1417-1425, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chui X,
    2. Egami H,
    3. Yamashita J,
    4. Kurizaki T,
    5. Ohmachi H,
    6. Yamamoto S,
    7. Ogawa M
    : Immunohistochemical expression of the c-KIT proto-oncogene product in human malignant and non-malignant breast tissues. Br J Cancer 73: 1233-1236, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Sperling C,
    2. Schwartz S,
    3. Büchner T,
    4. Thiel E,
    5. Ludwig WD
    : Expression of the stem cell factor receptor C-KIT (CD117) in acute leukemias. Haematologica 82: 617-621, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Krystal GW,
    2. Hines SJ,
    3. Organ CP
    : Autocrine growth of small cell lung cancer mediated by coexpression of c-KIT and stem cell factor. Cancer Res 56: 370-376, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ohashi A,
    2. Funasaka Y,
    3. Ueda M,
    4. Ichihashi M
    : c-KIT receptor expression in cutaneous malignant melanoma and benign melanotic naevi. Melanoma Res 6: 25-30, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hines SJ,
    2. Organ C,
    3. Kornstein MJ,
    4. Krystal GW
    : Coexpression of the c-KIT and stem cell factor genes in breast carcinomas. Cell Growth Differ 6: 769-779, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  22. ↵
    1. Strobl H,
    2. Takimoto M,
    3. Majdic O,
    4. Höcker P,
    5. Knapp W
    : Antigenic analysis of human haemopoietic progenitor cells expressing the growth factor receptor c-KIT. Br J Haematol 82: 287-294, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Baumhueter S,
    2. Dybdal N,
    3. Kyle C,
    4. Lasky LA
    : Global vascular expression of murine CD34, a sialomucin-like endothelial ligand for L-selectin. Blood 84: 2554-2565, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Young JW,
    2. Szabolcs P,
    3. Moore MA
    : Identification of dendritic cell colony-forming units among normal human CD34+ bone marrow progenitors that are expanded by c-KIT-ligand and yield pure dendritic cell colonies in the presence of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor alpha. J Exp Med 182: 1111-1119, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Doyonnas R,
    2. Nielsen JS,
    3. Chelliah S,
    4. Drew E,
    5. Hara T,
    6. Miyajima A,
    7. McNagny KM
    : Podocalyxin is a CD34-related marker of murine hematopoietic stem cells and embryonic erythroid cells. Blood 105: 4170-4178, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. De Francesco F,
    2. Tirino V,
    3. Desiderio V,
    4. Ferraro G,
    5. D'Andrea F,
    6. Giuliano M,
    7. Libondi G,
    8. Pirozzi G,
    9. De Rosa A,
    10. Papaccio G
    : Human CD34/CD90 ASCs are capable of growing as sphere clusters, producing high levels of VEGF and forming capillaries. PLoS One 4: 6537, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Nielsen JS,
    2. McNagny KM
    : Novel functions of the CD34 family. J Cell Sci 121: 3683-3692, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Mehra N,
    2. Penning M,
    3. Maas J,
    4. Beerepoot LV,
    5. van Daal N,
    6. van Gils CH,
    7. Giles RH,
    8. Voest EE
    : Progenitor marker CD133 mRNA is elevated in peripheral blood of cancer patients with bone metastases. Clin Cancer Res 12: 4859-4866, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Yin AH,
    2. Miraglia S,
    3. Zanjani ED,
    4. Almeida-Porada G,
    5. Ogawa M,
    6. Leary AG,
    7. Olweus J,
    8. Kearney J,
    9. Buck DW
    : AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 90: 5002-5012, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Florek M,
    2. Haase M,
    3. Marzesco AM,
    4. Freund D,
    5. Ehninger G,
    6. Huttner WB,
    7. Corbeil D
    : Prominin-1/CD133, a neural and hematopoietic stem cell marker, is expressed in adult human differentiated cells and certain types of kidney cancer. Cell Tissue Res 319: 15-26, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Mizrak D,
    2. Brittan M,
    3. Alison MR
    : CD133: molecule of the moment. J Pathol 214: 3-9, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hibi K,
    2. Sakata M,
    3. Sakuraba K,
    4. Shirahata A,
    5. Goto T,
    6. Mizukami H,
    7. Saito M,
    8. Ishibashi K,
    9. Kigawa G,
    10. Nemoto H,
    11. Sanada Y
    : CD133 gene overexpression is frequently observed in early colorectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 56: 995-997, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Wang Q,
    2. Chen ZG,
    3. Du CZ,
    4. Wang HW,
    5. Yan L,
    6. Gu J
    : Cancer stem cell marker CD133+ tumour cells and clinical outcome in rectal cancer. Histopathology 55: 284-293, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Ishigami S,
    2. Ueno S,
    3. Arigami T,
    4. Uchikado Y,
    5. Setoyama T,
    6. Arima H,
    7. Kita Y,
    8. Kurahara H,
    9. Okumura H,
    10. Matsumoto M,
    11. Kijima Y,
    12. Natsugoe S
    : Prognostic impact of CD133 expression in gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res 30: 2453-2457, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Zhao P,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Lu Y
    : Aberrant expression of CD133 protein correlates with Ki-67 expression and is a prognostic marker in gastric adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 10: 218-224, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 31, Issue 4
April 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Impact of CD133 Immunoexpression in Node-negative Invasive Breast Carcinomas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Impact of CD133 Immunoexpression in Node-negative Invasive Breast Carcinomas
A. IENI, G. GIUFFRÈ, V. ADAMO, G. TUCCARI
Anticancer Research Apr 2011, 31 (4) 1315-1320;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prognostic Impact of CD133 Immunoexpression in Node-negative Invasive Breast Carcinomas
A. IENI, G. GIUFFRÈ, V. ADAMO, G. TUCCARI
Anticancer Research Apr 2011, 31 (4) 1315-1320;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Primary Culture of Breast Cancer: A Model System for Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Cancer Stem Cells
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Low-dose Andrographolide Synergizes With Cytarabine or Vincristine in Plasma Cell Neoplasm Cell Lines
  • Enzalutamide Enhanced Honokiol-induced Apoptotic Insults to Drug-resistant Glioblastoma Cells via an Intrinsic Bak-mitochondrion-caspase Cascade Mechanism
  • Milk Extracellular Vesicle–mediated Delivery of siPRNP Suppresses Growth and Wound Closure in PC-3M Prostate Cancer Cells
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire