Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Revitalization of Human Bone after Extracorporeal High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment

JOHANNES SCHAUWECKER, RÜDIGER VON EISENHART-ROTHE, RAINER BURGKART, JUTTA TUEBEL, MANFRED SCHMITT, WOLFRAM MITTELMEIER and PETER DIEHL
Anticancer Research April 2011, 31 (4) 1235-1239;
JOHANNES SCHAUWECKER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: schauwecker{at}lrz.tum.de
RÜDIGER VON EISENHART-ROTHE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RAINER BURGKART
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUTTA TUEBEL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MANFRED SCHMITT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WOLFRAM MITTELMEIER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PETER DIEHL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Bone defects due to malignant tumor often lead to repeated surgery or amputation. Thus, a major objective in orthopedic surgery is the extracorporeal devitalization of tumor-bearing bone segments following reimplantation. Extracorporeal irradiation or autoclaving are possible methods even though they may cause severe loss of biomechanical and biological properties. Yet previous studies have shown that high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) allows for complete devitalization of tumor-afflicted bone segments, while the biomechanical and biological properties of bone tissue remained unchanged. The subject of the present study is revitalization of human bone segments after HHP treatment to acquire knowledge about the ingrowth and regeneration of osteoblast-like cells after such treatment. Materials and Methods: Bone pieces of 5 mm3 were obtained from cancellous bone, taken from human femoral heads of 6 patients undergoing surgery for total hip arthroplasty, and exposed to hydrostatic pressure levels of 0, 300, and 600 MPa for 10 min at 37°C. Following the HHP treatment, bone segments were coated with primary human bone cells (10,000 cells/segment), cultured for 42 days and cell viability and proliferation quantified at different time points. Results: An adhesion rate of 73.8% on day 1 and an increase in proliferation between day 14 and 42 were determined. Pretreatment of bone segments with 300 and 600 MPa did not affect cell adhesion or proliferation. Histology showed intact cells and new bone formation on the bone specimens; elevated expression of alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and collagen type I was seen by immunohistochemistry. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates, for the first time, the successful revitalization of HHP-treated bone segments. Concerning proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, the findings are a promising demonstration of sufficient osseointegration. Along with previous results, we anticipate that a pressure of a maximum 350 MPa does induce devitalization of malignant bone tumor segments, while HHP treatment of bone matrix up to 600 MPa does not affect osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity.

  • High hydrostatic pressure
  • bone
  • revitalization
  • tissue engineering

Treatment of cancer patients presenting with solid malignant tumor of the bone requires complete resection of the infiltrated tissue, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and eventually reconstruction. Different treatment modalities have been established for the reconstruction of bone and joint defects, including endoprostheses and spaceholders (1, 2), artificial bone substitutes (3), and allogeneic transplants (4). However, allogeneic transplantation of bones is a matter of dispute since such bones may be contaminated by viruses or bacteria (5), require special awareness of procurement and storage and may cause immunological responses (6, 7). Unfortunately, artificial bone substitutes are not suited for reconstruction of larger bone defects (8).

Since autologous bone grafts are considered as the ‘gold’ standard (9), an alternative approach for limb reconstruction of tumor-affected bone is extracorporeal irradiation or autoclaving of grafts with subsequent reimplantation. Nevertheless, one has to ensure that all tumor cells are inactivated prior to reimplantation in order to avoid tumor disease recurrence, whereby destruction of bone by irradiation or autoclaving is a matter of concern, associated with the loss of biomechanical and biological properties (6, 7, 10-15).

Therefore, there is a strong need to develop an adequate procedure that can achieve tumor cell inactivation of bone segments, without compromising osteoconductive, osteoinductive and biomechanical properties of the bone. High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) treatment of bone has been convincingly shown to be the ex vivo method of choice to inactivate tumor cells leaving the biological and biomechanical properties of bone, cartilage, and tendons intact (16). Previous studies have demonstrated that during this treatment, eukaryotic cells including tumor cells or tumor-afflicted bone specimens, are irreversibly impaired (17-20) while the biomechanical and biological properties of bone are preserved (21-23). There is little data as to the revitalization of HHP-treated bone with primary human bone cells, which is why the following study was performed.

The challenge in reconstructive bone surgery is to provide vital specimens with appropriate adaptability to integrate into the surrounding tissue. We now present evidence that revitalization of HHP-treated human bone with primary human bone cells can be achieved in order to accomplish satisfying reconstruction of bone defects.

Materials and Methods

Bone specimens. Human femoral heads were obtained from 6 patients (3 male and 3 female, aged 33 to 74 years, mean age 56 years) undergoing surgery for total hip replacement. The tissues were collected with the written informed consent of the patient and governed by a Hospital Ethics Committee. Bone biopsies were harvested, placed under the hood of a sterile workbench, and 20 tissue blocks cut (5 mm3) of each of the bone specimens. Until further use, the tissue blocks were kept in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

Cell isolation and culture. The remaining parts of the human femoral head specimens used for preparation of small tissue blocks were minced into small pieces and repeatedly washed with PBS in order to remove blood components. The explants were seeded in culture flasks and incubated with calcium-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1% (w/v) HEPES, 1% (w/v) Dulbecco's vitamins, and 1% (w/v) L-glutamine, at 37°C in humidified atmosphere of 5% (v/v) CO2. Media were changed every fourth day. Confluent cell outgrowth was accomplished after 12 days. The adherent cells were trypsinized and then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen until thawed and cultured for two rounds of 7 days each plus trypsinization.

HHP treatment. Falcon tubes (15 ml) were packed with ten bone specimens and filled with PBS, tightly sealed with parafilm after having eliminated any air bubbles. The sealed vials were placed into the water-filled cavity of a custom-made HHP device (Record Maschinenbau GmbH, Königssee, Germany) and exposed to pressures of 0, 300, and 600 MPa for 10 min at 37°C (16). The pressure values were reached within a few seconds and then maintained for a defined period of time before reduction to atmospheric pressure within a few seconds.

Seeding procedure. Immediately after decompression bone specimens were placed into 48-well culture plates. Fifty microliters of cell suspension containing 10,000 primary human bone cells were seeded on top of each bone scaffold. Plates were stored at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere at 5% (v/v) CO2 for 60 min to allow attachment. Calcium-free DMEM, supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1% (w/v) HEPES, 1% (w/v) Dulbecco's vitamins, 1% (w/v) L-glutamine, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid, 10 nM dexamethasone, and antibiotics (penicillin 1000 U/ml, streptomycin 10 mg/ml), was then added until specimens were completely covered with media. Plates were stored for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere at 5% (v/v) CO2. The next day, each bone specimen was placed into a new well and the remaining osteoblast-like cells attached to the original culture dish wells were counted and subtracted from 10,000 in order to obtain the initial cell adhesion rate. For controls, cells were seeded directly onto the bottom of 6-well dishes without bone specimens. Tissue cultures were maintained for 42 days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere at 5% (v/v) CO2; media were changed every fourth day.

Hexosaminidase assay. At day 1, 14, 28, and 42, bone scaffolds and control wells were analyzed and cell-associated hexosaminidase activity determined in triplicate as a measure of cell proliferation by employing a colorimetric assay according to the protocol of Landegren (24).

Histology and immunohistochemistry. After 6 weeks in culture, scaffolds were fixed with buffered 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde, decalcified, and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), according to standard procedures. For histological documentation and immunohistochemical assessment of biomarkers, 5 μm-thick sections were cut and processed. Connective tissue was stained according to the trichrome Masson-Goldner staining procedure which combines the staining dyes azophloxine, orange G, and light green SF, whereby muscle fibre, collagenous fibre, fibrin and erythrocytes can be visualized selectively.

Active bone formation was assessed by determining alkaline phosphatase as a product of osteoblast activity in the fixed sections which were incubated for 30 min at room temperature with nitroblue tetrazolium chloride 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate toluidine salt (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany).

For demonstration of osteocalcin (OC) and collagen type I (COL-I) protein expression endogenous peroxidase activity present in fixed sections was blocked by pretreatment with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min at room temperature. Thereafter, sections were reacted with antibodies against OC (dilution 1:50; Quartett, Berlin, Germany) and COL-1 (dilution 1:25; Biotrend, Cologne, Germany). Antibody binding was visualized by use of the avidin-biotin-peroxidase method (Vectastain ABC Elite Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) combined with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) as chromogen substrate.

Histological staining and immunohistochemical biomarker staining was recorded by light microscopy applying an Axiovert 25 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with an Axiocam camera (Zeiss).

Statistics. Statistical analysis employed Student's t-test. All results were expressed as the means±standard deviation of assessment of the samples in triplicate. Differences were considered statistically significant at p≤0.05.

Results

In the present study, we show that on day 1, after seeding 10,000 osteoblast-like cells prepared from donor bones onto pieces of bone specimens, 73.8% of cells adhered to the bone matrix, as assessed by the hexosaminidase activity assay. There was no significant difference observed between control experiments without HHP treatment (74.1%) and those treated with 300 MPa (70.0%) or 600 MPa (77.4%). Cell proliferation was noted between day 14 and day 42; again it was similar for HHP values up to 600 MPa (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Hexosaminidase activity determined on day 1, 14, 28, and 42 in pooled (6 patients) primary human bone cells seeded on HHP-pretreated bone specimens placed in microtiter plate wells.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Histological staining (Masson-Goldner) of HHP-treated (600 MPa) bone specimen colonized with culture pooled bone cells, after 6 weeks in culture. Green: Old bone matrix. Purple: New bone formation.

Histological staining of bone pieces pretreated with different pressure values and seeded with osteoblast-like cells after 6 weeks in culture showed intact cells homogeneously spread on the bone surface; new bone formation also occurred (Figure 2). For this, the bone specimens were assessed for alkaline phosphatase enzymatic activity and for OC and COL-I expression (Figure 3).

Moreover, we noticed an increase in cell proliferation of these attached bone cells between day 14 and day 42 (Figure 1); histological examination confirmed the presence of a multilayer of bone cells on the HHP-treated bone specimens (Figure 2).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Alkaline phosphatase activity stain (a), and immunohistochemical staining for osteocalcin (b) and collagen type I (c) of HHP-treated (600 MPa) bone specimen colonized with culture pooled bone cells, after 6 weeks in culture.

Bone cell differentiation after 6 weeks in culture was verified by staining HHP-treated, bone cell populated bone tissue for alkaline phosphatase activity, which is an indicator for osteoblast-like cells and thus an indicator for the formation of new bone tissue (Figure 3a) (25). In addition, in the bone, the peptide hormone OC is manufactured exclusively by osteoblasts, and thus is a biomarker for the bone formation process (26). As shown in Figure 3b, OC was expressed in the seeded bone cells attached to the HHP-treated bone specimens. COL-I is a fibrillar collagen found in most connective tissues, including cartilage and bone (26). Immunohistochemical examination of bone specimens treated with increasing pressure rates up to 600 MPa showed no significant difference in COL-I expression (Figure 3c).

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the efficacy of ex vivo revitalization of HHP-treated bone specimens with primary human bone cells. Extracorporeal irradiation and autoclaving are possible methods for sterilization of tumor-bearing bone segments. However, both methods suffer from disadvantages due to insufficient biomechanical and biological properties of the bone subsequent to irradiation or autoclaving (5, 11, 12). Since the food industry successfully demonstrated the use of HHP for preserving food and beverages, medical application of this technology was envisioned, for instance the use of extracorporeal HHP as an alternative approach for tumor devitalization of bones.

Our previous studies investigated the influence of HHP on biological and biomechanical properties of bone explants (16-23, 27). Owing to the effect of elevated pressure treatment, eukaryotic cells including tumor cells are irreversibly impaired at pressure values exceeding 350 MPa (17-19), while at pressure values up to 600 MPa, biomechanical properties of bone, tendon and cartilage remain nearly unchanged (21-23). As a result, extracorporeal treatment with HHP inhibits cell outgrowth of tumor-afflicted bones and cartilage (20). However, HHP treatment did not significantly affect adherence, spreading, or proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells on major extracellular matrix proteins present in bone tissue, such as fibronectin, vitronectin, and type I collagen (27).

Subsequent to our previous experiments, the present study was designed to demonstrate whether colonization of explanted HHP-treated human bone by osteoblast-like cells and their subsequent proliferation was affected by HHP pretreatment. The excellent adhesion rate of 73.8% along with continuous cell proliferation up to 42 days and the proofed osteogenic differentation that HHP treatment of human bone specimen does not affect the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. For successful ingrowth of bone cells into mid-size bone defects, competent osteogenous cells are required for successful colonization of the connecting surface of the bone to achieve effective remodelling of the bone defect (28).

For extracorporeal irradiation or autoclaving of tumor-afflicted bone, clinical, radiographic and biomechanical protocols are available (29, 30). However, in vitro investigations of revitalization of irradiated or autoclaved bone tissue are lacking. The present results demonstrate effective adhesion and proliferation of primary human bone cells onto HHP-devitalized human bone specimens. Compared to other tissue engineering procedures mentioned in the literature, the bone cell adhesion rate of 73.8% after HHP treatment is very promising (31). Published long-term in vitro follow-up results demonstrating the effect of scaffolds such as sterilized bone matrices or synthetic implants on human osteoblast-like cells are rare. As an example of the few reports available in the literature, similar to our findings, Klein et al. showed comparable long-term proliferation rates and osteogenic differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells seeded on titanium surfaces over a duration of 21 days in culture (32).

Lastly, the present study demonstrates, for the first time, the successful revitalization of HHP-treated bone specimens with human osteoblast-like cells. Regarding bone cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, the results are indicative of sufficient osseointegration by employing this gentle mode of bone sterilization. In accordance with our previous results, we anticipate that short-term HHP treatment up to 600 MPa causes no alterations in bone matrix which would impair its osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity, while a pressure level of 350 MPa is sufficient to induce devitalization of malignant bone tumor segments.

In summary, these and the present findings suggest that HHP could be used clinically for ex vivo bone tumor devitalization with increased and accelerated bone graft integration in order to allow autologous reimplantation of previously tumor cell-affected bone segments.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Research Network for Tissue Engineering and Rapid Prototyping (Forschungsverbund FORTEPRO, project TE3) of the Bavarian Research Foundation (Bayerische Forschungsstiftung).

  • Received February 1, 2011.
  • Revision received March 21, 2011.
  • Accepted March 22, 2011.
  • Copyright© 2011 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gradinger R,
    2. Rechl H,
    3. Hipp E
    : Pelvic osteosarcoma. Resection, reconstruction, local control, and survival statistics. Clin Orthop Relat Res pp. 149-158, 1991.
  2. ↵
    1. Morris HG,
    2. Capanna R,
    3. Del Ben M,
    4. Campanacci D
    : Prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur after resection for bone tumors. J Arthroplasty 10: 293-299, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Mittelmeier H,
    2. Mittelmeier W,
    3. Gleitz M
    : Pyrost, a spongious, mineral bone substitute. Experimental bases and 13-year clinical experience in over 1,000 cases. Orthopade 27: 126-135, 1998 (in German).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Enneking WF,
    2. Campanacci DA
    : Retrieved human allografts: a clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A: 971-986, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Knaepler H,
    2. Haas H,
    3. Puschel HU
    : Biomechanical properties of heat and irradiation treated spongiosa. Unfallchirurgie 17: 194-199, 1991 (in German).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Sanjay BK,
    2. Moreau PG,
    3. Younge DA
    : Reimplantation of autoclaved tumour bone in limb salvage surgery. Int Orthop 21: 291-297, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Sys G,
    2. Uyttendaele D,
    3. Poffyn B,
    4. Verdonk R,
    5. Verstraete L
    : Extracorporeally irradiated autografts in pelvic reconstruction after malignant tumour resection. Int Orthop 26: 174-178, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Mittelmeier W,
    2. Braun C,
    3. Gradinger R
    : Fractures of the lower leg with bony defects – various methods of bone reconstruction. Chirurg 67: 1087-1092, 1996 (in German).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Rueger JM
    : Bone substitution materials. Current status and prospects. Orthopade 27: 72-79, 1998 (in German).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Araki N,
    2. Myoui A,
    3. Kuratsu S,
    4. Hashimoto N,
    5. Inoue T,
    6. Kudawara I,
    7. Ueda T,
    8. Yoshikawa H,
    9. Masaki N,
    10. Uchida A
    : Intraoperative extracorporeal autogenous irradiated bone grafts in tumor surgery. Clin Orthop 368: 196-206, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bohm P,
    2. Fritz J,
    3. Thiede S,
    4. Budach W
    : Reimplantation of extracorporeal irradiated bone segments in musculoskeletal tumor surgery: clinical experience in eight patients and review of the literature. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387: 355-365, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Bohm P,
    2. Springfeld R,
    3. Springer H
    : Re-implantation of autoclaved bone segments in musculoskeletal tumor surgery. Clinical experience in 9 patients followed for 1.1-8.4 years and review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 118: 57-65, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen WM,
    2. Chen TH,
    3. Huang CK,
    4. Chiang CC,
    5. Lo WH
    : Treatment of malignant bone tumours by extracorporeally irradiated autograft-prosthetic composite arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84: 1156-1161, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Knaepler H,
    2. Ascherl R,
    3. von Garrel T,
    4. Gotzen L
    : Guidelines for allogeneic bone transplantation. Chirurg 62: 763-765, 1991 (in German).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Urist MR,
    2. Hernandez A
    : Excitation transfer in bone. Deleterious effects of cobalt 60 radiation-sterilization of bank bone. Arch Surg 109: 586-593, 1974.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Diehl P,
    2. Schauwecker J,
    3. Mittelmeier W,
    4. Schmitt M
    : High hydrostatic pressure, a novel approach in orthopedic surgical oncology to disinfect bone, tendons and cartilage. Anticancer Res 28: 3877-3883, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Diehl P,
    2. Reuning U,
    3. Gollwitzer H,
    4. Magdolen U,
    5. Gerdesmeyer L,
    6. Schauwecker J,
    7. Tuebel J,
    8. Gradinger R,
    9. Mittelmeier W,
    10. Schmitt M
    : Effect of extracorporal high hydrostatic pressure on tumor cell adherence and viability. Oncol Rep 12: 369-373, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Diehl P,
    2. Schmitt M,
    3. Blumelhuber G,
    4. Frey B,
    5. van Laak S,
    6. Fischer S,
    7. Muehlenweg B,
    8. Meyer-Pittroff R,
    9. Gollwitzer H,
    10. Mittelmeier W
    : Induction of tumor cell death by high hydrostatic pressure as a novel supporting technique in orthopedic surgery. Oncol Rep 10: 1851-1855, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Naal FD,
    2. Mengele K,
    3. Schauwecker J,
    4. Gollwitzer H,
    5. Gerdesmeyer L,
    6. Reuning U,
    7. Mittelmeier W,
    8. Gradinger R,
    9. Schmitt M,
    10. Diehl P
    : High hydrostatic pressure-induced cell death in human chondrocytes and chondrosarcoma cells. Anticancer Res 25: 1977-1982, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Schauwecker J,
    2. Wirthmann L,
    3. Schmitt M,
    4. Tuebel J,
    5. Magdolen U,
    6. Gradinger R,
    7. Mittelmeier W,
    8. Diehl P
    : Effect of extracorporeal high hydrostatic pressure on cellular outgrowth from tumor-afflicted bone. Anticancer Res 26: 85-89, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Diehl P,
    2. Steinhauser E,
    3. Gollwitzer H,
    4. Heister C,
    5. Schauwecker J,
    6. Milz S,
    7. Mittelmeier W,
    8. Schmitt M
    : Biomechanical and immunohistochemical analysis of high hydrostatic pressure-treated Achilles tendons. J Orthop Sci 11: 380-385, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Diehl P,
    2. Naal FD,
    3. Schauwecker J,
    4. Steinhauser E,
    5. Milz S,
    6. Gollwitzer H,
    7. Mittelmeier W
    : Biomechanical properties of articular cartilage after high hydrostatic pressure treatment. Biomed Tech (Berl) 51: 8-14, 2006 (in German).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Steinhauser E,
    2. Diehl P,
    3. Hadaller M,
    4. Schauwecker J,
    5. Busch R,
    6. Gradinger R,
    7. Mittelmeier W
    : Biomechanical investigation of the effect of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on the mechanical properties of human bone. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 76: 130-135, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Landegren U
    : Measurement of cell numbers by means of the endogenous enzyme hexosaminidase. Applications to detection of lymphokines and cell surface antigens. J Immunol Methods 67: 379-388, 1984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Ashton BA,
    2. Abdullah F,
    3. Cave J,
    4. Williamson M,
    5. Sykes BC,
    6. Couch M,
    7. Poser JW
    : Characterization of cells with high alkaline phosphatase activity derived from human bone and marrow: preliminary assessment of their osteogenicity. Bone 6: 313-319, 1985.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Aubin JE
    : Regulation of osteoblast formation and function. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2: 81-94, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Diehl P,
    2. Schmitt M,
    3. Schauwecker J,
    4. Eichelberg K,
    5. Gollwitzer H,
    6. Gradinger R,
    7. Goebel M,
    8. Preissner KT,
    9. Mittelmeier W,
    10. Magdolen U
    : Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on biological properties of extracellular bone matrix proteins. Int J Mol Med 16: 285-289, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Livingston TL,
    2. Gordon S,
    3. Archambault M,
    4. Kadiyala S,
    5. McIntosh K,
    6. Smith A,
    7. Peter SJ
    : Mesenchymal stem cells combined with biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics promote bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 14: 211-218, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Singh VA,
    2. Nagalingam J,
    3. Saad M,
    4. Pailoor J
    : Which is the best method of sterilization of tumour bone for reimplantation? A biomechanical and histopathological study. BioMed Engin 9: 48-63, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Yamamoto T,
    2. Hitora T,
    3. Marui T,
    4. Akisue T,
    5. Nagira K,
    6. Kawamoto T,
    7. Yoshiya S,
    8. Kurosaka M
    : Reimplantation of autoclaved or irradiated cortical bones invaded by soft tissue sarcomas. Anticancer Res 22: 3685-3690, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Vigier S,
    2. Helary C,
    3. Fromigue O,
    4. Marie P,
    5. Giraud-Guille MM
    : Collagen supramolecular and suprafibrillar organizations on osteoblasts long-term behavior: benefits for bone healing materials. J Biomed Mater Res A 94: 556-567, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Klein MO,
    2. Bijelic A,
    3. Toyoshima T,
    4. Gotz H,
    5. von Koppenfels RL,
    6. Al Nawas B,
    7. Duschner H
    : Long-term response of osteogenic cells on micron and submicron-scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces: sequence of cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Clin Oral Implants Res 21: 642-649, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 31, Issue 4
April 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Revitalization of Human Bone after Extracorporeal High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Revitalization of Human Bone after Extracorporeal High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment
JOHANNES SCHAUWECKER, RÜDIGER VON EISENHART-ROTHE, RAINER BURGKART, JUTTA TUEBEL, MANFRED SCHMITT, WOLFRAM MITTELMEIER, PETER DIEHL
Anticancer Research Apr 2011, 31 (4) 1235-1239;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Revitalization of Human Bone after Extracorporeal High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment
JOHANNES SCHAUWECKER, RÜDIGER VON EISENHART-ROTHE, RAINER BURGKART, JUTTA TUEBEL, MANFRED SCHMITT, WOLFRAM MITTELMEIER, PETER DIEHL
Anticancer Research Apr 2011, 31 (4) 1235-1239;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • CD133+ Lung Cancer Stem-like Cells Resist Plasma-activated Medium Through PRDX5-mediated Antioxidant Defense
  • Iodine-Hoechst Enhances X-ray Sensitivity of Cancer Cells Under Normal and Low Oxygen Conditions
  • Exploring SLC1A5 (ASCT2), SLC7A5, and SLC3A2 (LAT1) Genetic Variants in Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Prognosis and Personalized Care
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire