Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Expression of Cancer Stem Cell Markers CD133 and CD44 in Locoregional Recurrence of Rectal Cancer

TOMOYUKI NAGATA, CHOUHEI SAKAKURA, SOUSUKE KOMIYAMA, ATSUSHI MIYASHITA, MINORU NISHIO, YASUTOSHI MURAYAMA, SHUHEI KOMATSU, ATSUSHI SHIOZAKI, YOSHIAKI KURIU, HISASHI IKOMA, MASAYOSHI NAKANISHI, DAISUKE ICHIKAWA, HITOSHI FUJIWARA, KAZUMA OKAMOTO, TOSHIYA OCHIAI, YUKIHITO KOKUBA, TERUHISA SONOYAMA and EIGO OTSUJI
Anticancer Research February 2011, 31 (2) 495-500;
TOMOYUKI NAGATA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: drgechum{at}koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
CHOUHEI SAKAKURA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SOUSUKE KOMIYAMA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ATSUSHI MIYASHITA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MINORU NISHIO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUTOSHI MURAYAMA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHUHEI KOMATSU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ATSUSHI SHIOZAKI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIAKI KURIU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HISASHI IKOMA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAYOSHI NAKANISHI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAISUKE ICHIKAWA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HITOSHI FUJIWARA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUMA OKAMOTO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOSHIYA OCHIAI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUKIHITO KOKUBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TERUHISA SONOYAMA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EIGO OTSUJI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Recent findings suggest that cells with surface CD markers include cancer stem cells (CSCs) which can produce a cancer cluster, and that the presence of CSCs may be linked with prognosis. CD133 and CD44 are among the most useful markers for identification of colorectal CSCs. Materials and Methods: An immunohistological analysis of CD133 and CD44 was performed using tissue from cases shown to be locoregionally recurrent or non-recurrent clinico-pathologically. Results: The CD133-positive rates were 38.7% and 59.23% in non-recurrent and recurrent cases, respectively, and the CD44-positive rates were 35.5% and 44.4%, respectively. Expression of the CD markers had no correlation with other clinicopathological factors. The prognosis of patients who were positive for both markers was significantly worse than that of other patients. Conclusion: These results suggest that detection of CD133 and CD44 can provide useful information for selection of treatment and performance of intensive follow-up of colorectal cancer.

  • Cancer stem cell
  • recurrence
  • CD marker
  • CD133
  • CD44
  • rectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer and a major cause of mortality (1). Locoregional recurrence in the pelvis occurs frequently after rectal cancer surgery, and early diagnosis and initiation of therapy are desirable since recurrent cases have a poor prognosis. Thus, the 5-year survival rate for colorectal cancer without lymph node involvement is 66-80%, while the presence of distant metastases reduces the survival rate by up to 7% (2). The cancer is resectable in 70-80% of newly diagnosed patients with localized disease, but most die within 5 years from advanced recurrence or metastasis after surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy.

The cancer stem cell (CSC) theory is a particularly interesting concept in current cancer research. According to this theory, cancer clusters cannot be considered as simple monoclonal expansions of cancer cells with equivalent functions. In contrast, regardless of their monoclonal origin, only a small minority of cancer cells are proposed to have the capacity to maintain malignancy (3, 4). The CSC theory originated from hematology and is now beginning to be considered in terms of CD markers of CSCs. Several CD molecules have been identified as CSC markers. CD133 (PROML1 or prominin) is a cell surface antigen that has recently been recognized as a potential CSC marker in brain, colon and prostate cancer (5-8). CD44 (homing cell adhesion molecule) is a cell surface glycoprotein that is expressed on lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes, and has been recognized as a CSC marker in breast, pancreas, and head and neck cancer (9-11).

CD133 and CD44 appear to be useful markers for isolation and further characterization of colorectal CSCs. However, the relationships of recurrent cancer with and without these markers with other clinicopathological features are unknown. Moreover, there have been few studies of the prognosis of cases of recurrent rectal cancer based on the presence or absence of CD markers.

In this study, the relationship of locoregional recurrence after rectal surgery with immunohistological detection of CD133 or CD44 was examined in rectal cancer samples. CD133+ and CD44+ cancer cells were identified in the tumor samples, and these findings were compared with the clinicopathologic features of recurrent and non-recurrent cases.

Materials and Methods

Clinical samples. Samples were obtained from patients with histologically proven colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between 1995 and 2006 at the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. Several of these patients died in the immediate postoperative period and were excluded from the study. Follow-up by outpatient consultations or by telephone and mail was performed until death or the cutoff date. Several cases were lost to follow-up and were also excluded. The final analysis included rectal cancer specimens from 58 cases, including 27 in which surgery was performed for resection of local recurrent lesions in the pelvis, and 31 without recurrence after the initial rectal surgery. The study was approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee.

Immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemical staining was carried out using 5-μm sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Detection of CD133 and CD44 in these samples was performed with AC133 (CD133) antibody, purified rabbit polyclonal antibody (Pab) (1:50, clone RB1784; ABGENT, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-CD44 mouse mAb (1:50, clone BU75; Ancell, Bayport, MN, USA) as the respective primary antibodies. For antibody staining, endogenous peroxidase was blocked using 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min and primary antibody incubation was carried out at room temperature for 120 min. Vectastain ABC-Kits Elite Universal (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) were used for detection and slides were developed with Liquid DAB Substrate (Dako, Japan).

Evaluation of immunostained tissue sections of colorectal adenocarcinomas was performed for the edge of the tumor. Positive tumor glands were defined based on cytosolic staining (Figure 1A) and membranous staining (Figure 1B) of CD44 and CD133, respectively.

Statistical analysis. Cross-tabulations were calculated by Chi-square test (or Fisher exact test) and t-test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival, and CD-negative and -positive cases were compared by log-rank test. All statistical analyses and graphics were performed with JMP 7.0.1 package (SAS Institute Inc., Tokyo), with p<0.05 considered to be statistically significant.

Results

CD133 and CD44 were both detected immunohistochemically in colorectal cancer specimens. CD marker expression in tissue samples from rectal cancer and from recurrent lesions was found in the cytosol and in the membranous region at the apical luminal surface, as described by Horst et al. (12). Therefore, the in situ expression patterns of our samples were consistent with previously published data on CD-positive cell phenotypes.

The CD133+ rate did not differ significantly between the non-recurrent and recurrent groups (38.71% vs. 59.20%, p=0.117). Similarly, the CD44+ rate did not differ significantly between the respective groups (35.48% vs. 44.40%, p=0.487). However, the percentage of cases that were both CD133+ and CD44+ tended to be higher in the recurrent group (19.35% vs. 40.74%, p=0.073) (Figure 2). Therefore, a combination of CD markers may be more effective for differentiating between recurrent and non-recurrent cases, and for predicting a risk of locoregional recurrence after rectal cancer surgery. Comparison of the CD marker status with clinicopathologic features showed no correlation with tumor size, age, gender, depth of the tumor, lymphatic and blood vessel invasion, and LN metastasis (Table I).

Next, we examined the correlation of expression of CD markers with patient prognoses using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The median and mean overall survival periods in the recurrent group were 23.6 and 26.9 months, respectively (range: 2.6-71 months). Five-year overall survival was shorter in the CD44+ group than in the CD44− group (p=0.088), and was significantly shorter in patients who were both CD133+ CD44+ compared to all other patients (p=0.0225) (Figure 3). These results show that a positive status for both CD markers is associated with a significant difference in prognosis after rectal cancer surgery. In contrast, neither CD marker alone was predictive of prognosis. Thus, combined analysis of CD133 and CD44 may be more effective for establishing the risk of a poor prognosis after rectal cancer surgery.

Discussion

The field of CSCs is relatively new and many questions remain unanswered. Studies on solid tumors have begun to provide experimental evidence that supports the presence of CSCs. It has been proposed that a rare subpopulation of cells within the cancer cluster has the potential to self-renew, differentiate and maintain cancer growth (13-15); and recent studies have shown that leukemia (16, 17) and several solid tumors, such as gastric (18), liver (19, 20), pancreatic (10), prostate (21-23), breast (9, 24), lung (25), glioblastoma (7), and colorectal (5, 6, 26) tumors, contain such subsets of CSCs. The current consensus definition describes a CSC as a cell within a tumor that can renew itself and can develop heterogeneous cancer cells that form the cancer body (27-29). This definition is consistent with the use of ‘cancer-initiating cells’ as an alternative term to describe putative CSCs (5, 6, 9, 30).

CD133 and CD44 have been described as stem cell markers for colorectal cancer in several reports, and use of CD133 and CD44 as markers to identify CSCs has been suggested for mammary (9, 24), brain (7), liver (19, 20) and prostate (22, 23) cancer. CD133 (AC133), a glycoprotein containing five transmembrane domains, is expressed on CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells derived from human fetal liver and bone marrow (31). CD133+ cells from glioblastoma (7) and pancreatic cancer (32) have the capacity to form tumors in mice more efficiently compared to residual cells from the total tumor population. CD44 has been used as a marker of CSCs in breast (9, 24), head and neck (33) and prostate cancer (22, 23). Physiologically, CD44 is a key cell membrane glycoprotein that has a role in cell-matrix adhesion and lymphocyte activation (34).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Immunostaining for CD markers was performed using whole tissue sections of colorectal adenocarcinomas. Positive tumor glands were defined by cytosolic staining or luminal surface staining of glands. A: Loupe and microscope image (×400) of cytosolic staining by CD44 antibody. B: Loupe and microscope image (×400) of surface staining by CD133 antibody.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

The CD-133 positive rate of the non-recurrent and recurrent groups (38.7% (12/31) vs. 59.2% (16/27), p=0.117) did not differ significantly, nor did the CD44-positive rate of the respective groups (35.5% (11/31) vs. 44.4% (12/27), p=0.487). Both CD133- and CD44-positivity tend to be higher in the recurrent group (19.4% (6/31) vs. 40.7% (11/27), p=0.073). P-values were calculated by cross-tabulations.

In this study, we demonstrated that CD133+ or CD44+ cells are clearly present in some colorectal tumors, but the actual CSCs among these cells cannot be determined using these or other markers. Thus, although CD133 and CD44 are currently two of the best markers for CSCs, it is clear that not every CD133+ or CD44+ cell is a CSC. For example, it has been calculated that only 1 in 262 CD133+ colon cancer cells actually has the capacity for cancer initiation (5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Univariate analysis of the relationships of CD markers with tumor size, age, invasive depth of the tumor, lymphatic and vascular invasion, and lymph node (LN) metastasis.

We investigated the expression of CD markers in rectal cancer specimens using an immunohistochemical approach. The localization of CD marker-positive colorectal cancer cells has yet to be verified in situ, and organ-specific expression patterns of these markers requires further clarification. Horst et al. found that the CD133 antigen is located at the luminal surface of epithelial tumor glands with shedding into the lumina (12), whereas more recent staining results suggest cytoplasmic expression of CD133 in pancreatic cancer samples (32, 35).

In the present study, there was a trend for recurrent cases being positive for both CD133 and CD44 compared to non-recurrent cases. This result suggests that cancer cells with these markers might play a role in recurrence, and CD44 has been proven to be a strong marker for stem cells in colon cancer (26). The role of CD44 as a CSC marker was further investigated in gene expression profiling by Polyak et al., with the finding that CD44+ breast cancer cells had a gene profile similar to that of stem cells (36). Elevation of mRNA levels for CD133 is also predictive of a tendency for recurrence in stage IV colon cancer (37). Increased CD133 expression has also been correlated with a higher tumor grade, advanced disease stage, and elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein levels.

In our study, overall survival of CD44-positive patients tended to be shorter than that of other patients, although without any significant difference. The lack of statistical significance may be due to the small number of recurrent cases after rectal surgery, and the importance of CD44 may become clearer with accumulation of more cases. Only a few studies have examined the prognostic impact of the presence of CD133+ cells in solid tumors and the results are contradictory (38-40). For example, in patients with glioma, the proportion of CD133+ cells in cancer clusters was a significant prognostic factor and an indicator of recurrence and malignant progression (40). In pancreatic cancer patients, Maeda et al. showed that CD133 expression correlated with lymph node metastasis and survival (35). However, Immervoll et al. did not find a significant link between CD133 expression and the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer (42).

A striking aspect of the current study was that the overall survival of patients who were positive for both CD133 and CD44 was significantly shorter than that of all other patients. Our results also suggest that both CD markers in combination may be an indicator of poor prognosis after rectal cancer surgery. Therefore, CD133+ or CD44+ cells may have a tendency to aggravate prognosis, and combination analysis of these markers may provide useful information for selection of treatment and performance of intensive follow-up.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Survival curves for patients who were positive for cancer stem cell markers. A: The prognosis of CD133-positive cases did not differ significantly from that of CD133-negative cases (5-year survival rate: 13.3% vs. 20.0%; p=0.5748). B: CD44-positive cases had poorer survival than CD44-negative cases (5-year survival rate: 0.0% vs. 28.6%; p=0.0882). C: Patients who were positive for CD44 and CD133 showed a significantly poorer prognosis than other patients (5-year survival rate: 0.0% vs. 25.0%; p=0.0225).

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Received November 5, 2010.
  • Revision received January 4, 2011.
  • Accepted January 5, 2011.
  • Copyright© 2011 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Compton CC
    : Colorectal carcinoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and molecular features. Mod Pathol 16: 376-388, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Weitz J,
    2. Koch M,
    3. Debus J,
    4. Höhler T,
    5. Galle PR,
    6. Büchler MW
    : Colorectal cancer. Lancet 365: 153-165, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Brabletz T,
    2. Jung A,
    3. Spaderna S,
    4. Hlubek F,
    5. Kirchner T
    : Opinion: migrating cancer stem cells – an integrated concept of malignant tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 5(9): 744-749, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Burkert J,
    2. Wright NA,
    3. Alison MR
    : Stem cells and cancer: an intimate relationship. J Pathol 209(3): 287-297, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. O'Brien CA,
    2. Pollett A,
    3. Gallinger S,
    4. Dick JE
    : A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature 445: 106-110, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ricci-Vitiani L,
    2. Lombardi DG,
    3. Pilozzi E,
    4. Biffoni M,
    5. Todaro M,
    6. Peschle C,
    7. De Maria R
    : Identification and expansion of human colon cancer-initiating cells. Nature 445: 111-115, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Singh SK,
    2. Hawkins C,
    3. Clarke ID,
    4. Squire JA,
    5. Bayani J,
    6. Hide T,
    7. Henkelman RM,
    8. Cusimano MD,
    9. Dirks PB
    : Identification of human brain tumour-initiating cells. Nature 432: 396-401, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Miki J,
    2. Furusato B,
    3. Li H,
    4. Gu Y,
    5. Takahashi H,
    6. Egawa S,
    7. Sesterhenn IA,
    8. McLeod DG,
    9. Srivastava S,
    10. Rhim JS
    : Identification of putative stem cell markers, CD133 and CXCR4, in hTERT-immortalized primary nonmalignant and malignant tumor-derived human prostate epithelial cell lines and in prostate cancer specimens. Cancer Res 67: 3153-3161, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Al-Hajj M,
    2. Wicha MS,
    3. Benito-Hernandez A,
    4. Morrison SJ,
    5. Clarke MF
    : Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 3983-3988, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Heidt DG,
    3. Dalerba P,
    4. Burant CF,
    5. Zhang L,
    6. Adsay V,
    7. Wicha M,
    8. Clarke MF,
    9. Simeone DM
    : Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 67(3): 1030-1037, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Prince ME,
    2. Sivanandan R,
    3. Kaczorowski A,
    4. Wolf GT,
    5. Kaplan MJ,
    6. Dalerba P,
    7. Weissman IL,
    8. Clarke MF,
    9. Ailles LE
    : Identification of a subpopulation of cells with cancer stem cell properties in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 973-978, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Horst D,
    2. Kriegl L,
    3. Engel J,
    4. Kirchner T,
    5. Jung A
    : CD133 expression is an independent prognostic marker for low survival in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 99: 1285-1289, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Bruce WR,
    2. Van Der Gaag H
    : A quantitative assay for the number of murine lymphoma cells capable of proliferation in vivo. Nature 199: 79-80, 1963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hamburger AW,
    2. Salmon SE
    : Primary bioassay of human tumor stem cells. Science 197: 461-463, 1977.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Park CH,
    2. Bergsagel DE,
    3. McCulloch EA
    : Mouse myeloma tumor stem cells: a primary cell culture assay. J Natl Cancer Inst 46: 411-422, 1971.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bonnet D,
    2. Dick JE
    : Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 3: 730-737, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lapidot T,
    2. Sirard C,
    3. Vormoor J,
    4. Murdoch B,
    5. Hoang T,
    6. Caceres-Cortes J,
    7. Minden M,
    8. Paterson B,
    9. Caligiuri MA,
    10. Dick JE
    : A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 367: 645-648, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Houghton J,
    2. Stoicov C,
    3. Nomura S,
    4. Rogers AB,
    5. Carlson J,
    6. Li H,
    7. Cai X,
    8. Fox JG,
    9. Goldenring JR,
    10. Wang TC
    : Gastric cancer originating from bone marrow-derived cells. Science 306: 1568-1571, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Ma S,
    2. Chan KW,
    3. Hu L,
    4. Lee TK,
    5. Wo JY,
    6. Ng IO,
    7. Zheng BJ,
    8. Guan XY
    : Identification and characterization of tumorigenic liver cancer stem/progenitor cells. Gastroenterology 132: 2542-2556, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Yin S,
    2. Li J,
    3. Hu C,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Yao M,
    6. Yan M,
    7. Jiang G,
    8. Ge C,
    9. Xie H,
    10. Wan D,
    11. Yang S,
    12. Zheng S,
    13. Gu J
    : CD133-positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells possess high capacity for tumorigenicity. Int J Cancer 120: 1444-1450, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Collins AT,
    2. Berry PA,
    3. Hyde C,
    4. Stower MJ,
    5. Maitland NJ
    : Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 65: 10946-10951, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Hurt EM,
    2. Kawasaki BT,
    3. Klarmann GJ,
    4. Thomas SB,
    5. Farrar WL
    : CD44+ CD24− prostate cells are early cancer progenitor/stem cells that provide a model for patients with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer 98: 756-765, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Patrawala L,
    2. Calhoun T,
    3. Schneider-Broussard R,
    4. Li H,
    5. Bhatia B,
    6. Tang S,
    7. Reilly JG,
    8. Chandra D,
    9. Zhou J,
    10. Claypool K,
    11. Coghlan L,
    12. Tang DG
    : Highly purified CD44+ prostate cancer cells from xenograft human tumors are enriched in tumorigenic and metastatic progenitor cells. Oncogene 25: 1696-1708, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Wright MH,
    2. Calcagno AM,
    3. Salcido CD,
    4. Carlson MD,
    5. Ambudkar SV,
    6. Varticovski L
    : Brca1 breast tumors contain distinct CD44+/CD24− and CD133+ cells with cancer stem cell characteristics. Breast Cancer Res 10: R10, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kim CF,
    2. Jackson EL,
    3. Woolfenden AE,
    4. Lawrence S,
    5. Babar I,
    6. Vogel S,
    7. Crowley D,
    8. Bronson RT,
    9. Jacks T
    : Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell 121: 823-835, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Dalerba P,
    2. Dylla SJ,
    3. Park IK,
    4. Liu R,
    5. Wang X,
    6. Cho RW,
    7. Hoey T,
    8. Gurney A,
    9. Huang EH,
    10. Simeone DM,
    11. Shelton AA,
    12. Parmiani G,
    13. Castelli C,
    14. Clarke MF
    : Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 10158-10163, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Wang JC,
    2. Dick JE
    : Cancer stem cells: lessons from leukemia. Trends Cell Biol 15: 494-501, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Clarke MF,
    2. Dick JE,
    3. Dirks PB,
    4. Eaves CJ,
    5. Jamieson CH,
    6. Jones DL,
    7. Visvader J,
    8. Weissman IL,
    9. Wahl GM
    : Cancer stem cells-perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 66: 9339-9344, 2006.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Dalerba P,
    2. Cho RW,
    3. Clarke MF
    : Cancer stem cells: models and concepts. Annu Rev Med 58: 267-284, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Singh SK,
    2. Clarke ID,
    3. Hide T,
    4. Dirks PB
    : Dirks, Cancer stem cells in nervous system tumors. Oncogene 23: 7267-7273, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Miraglia S,
    2. Godfrey W,
    3. Yin AH,
    4. Atkins K,
    5. Warnke R,
    6. Holden JT,
    7. Bray RA,
    8. Waller EK,
    9. Buck DW
    : A novel five-transmembrane hematopoietic stem cell antigen: isolation, characterization, and molecular cloning. Blood 90: 5013-5021, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Hermann PC,
    2. Huber SL,
    3. Herrler T,
    4. Aicher A,
    5. Ellwart JW,
    6. Guba M,
    7. Bruns CJ,
    8. Heeschen C
    : Distinct populations of cancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer. Cell Stem Cell 13: 313-323, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Pries R,
    2. Witrkopf N,
    3. Trenkle T,
    4. Nitsch SM,
    5. Wollenberg B
    : Potential stem cell marker CD44 is constitutively expressed in permanent cell lines of head and neck cancer. In Vivo 22: 89-92, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Aruffo A,
    2. Stamenkovic I,
    3. Melnick M,
    4. Underhill CB,
    5. Seed B
    : CD44 is the principal cell surface receptor for hyaluronate. Cell 61: 1303-1313, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Maeda S,
    2. Shinchi H,
    3. Kurahara H,
    4. Mataki Y,
    5. Maemura K,
    6. Sato M,
    7. Natsugoe S,
    8. Aikou T,
    9. Takao S
    : CD133 expression is correlated with lymph node metastasis and vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 98: 1389-1397, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Bloushtain-Qimron N,
    2. Yao J,
    3. Snyder EL,
    4. Shipitsin M,
    5. Campbell LL,
    6. Mani SA,
    7. Hu M,
    8. Chen H,
    9. Ustyansky V,
    10. Antosiewicz JE,
    11. Argani P,
    12. Halushka MK,
    13. Thomson JA,
    14. Pharoah P,
    15. Porgador A,
    16. Sukumar S,
    17. Parsons R,
    18. Richardson AL,
    19. Stampfer MR,
    20. Gelman RS,
    21. Nikolskaya T,
    22. Nikolsky Y,
    23. Polyak K
    : Cell type-specific DNA methylation patterns in the human breast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 16: 14076-14081, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Lin EH,
    2. Hassan M,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Zhao H,
    5. Nooka A,
    6. Sorenson E,
    7. Xie K,
    8. Champlin R,
    9. Wu X,
    10. Li D
    : Elevated circulating endothelial progenitor marker CD133 messenger RNA levels predict colon cancer recurrence. Cancer 110(3): 534-542, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Rebetz J,
    2. Tian D,
    3. Persson A,
    4. Widegren B,
    5. Salford LG,
    6. Englund E,
    7. Gisselsson D,
    8. Fan X
    : Glial progenitor-like phenotype in low-grade glioma and enhanced CD133-expression and neuronal lineage differentiation potential in high-grade glioma. PLoS One 3(4): e1936, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tong QS,
    2. Zheng LD,
    3. Tang ST,
    4. Ruan QL,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Li SW,
    7. Jiang GS,
    8. Cai JB
    : Expression and clinical significance of stem cell marker CD133 in human neuroblastoma. World J Pediatr 4: 58-62, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Zeppernick F,
    2. Ahmadi R,
    3. Campos B,
    4. Dictus C,
    5. Helmke BM,
    6. Becker N,
    7. Lichter P,
    8. Unterberg A,
    9. Radlwimmer B,
    10. Herold-Mende CC
    : Stem cell marker CD133 affects clinical outcome in glioma patients. Clin Cancer Res 14: 123-129, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Meng HX,
    3. Yu Z,
    4. Li Q,
    5. Wang YF,
    6. Mai YJ,
    7. Han JL,
    8. Qiu LG
    : The expression of CD133 in acute leukemia and its clinical significance. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 25: 401-404, 2004 (in Chinese).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Immervoll H,
    2. Hoem D,
    3. Sakariassen PØ,
    4. Steffensen OJ,
    5. Molven A
    : Expression of the ‘stem cell marker’ CD133 in pancreas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. BMC Cancer 8: 48, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 31, Issue 2
February 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expression of Cancer Stem Cell Markers CD133 and CD44 in Locoregional Recurrence of Rectal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Expression of Cancer Stem Cell Markers CD133 and CD44 in Locoregional Recurrence of Rectal Cancer
TOMOYUKI NAGATA, CHOUHEI SAKAKURA, SOUSUKE KOMIYAMA, ATSUSHI MIYASHITA, MINORU NISHIO, YASUTOSHI MURAYAMA, SHUHEI KOMATSU, ATSUSHI SHIOZAKI, YOSHIAKI KURIU, HISASHI IKOMA, MASAYOSHI NAKANISHI, DAISUKE ICHIKAWA, HITOSHI FUJIWARA, KAZUMA OKAMOTO, TOSHIYA OCHIAI, YUKIHITO KOKUBA, TERUHISA SONOYAMA, EIGO OTSUJI
Anticancer Research Feb 2011, 31 (2) 495-500;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Expression of Cancer Stem Cell Markers CD133 and CD44 in Locoregional Recurrence of Rectal Cancer
TOMOYUKI NAGATA, CHOUHEI SAKAKURA, SOUSUKE KOMIYAMA, ATSUSHI MIYASHITA, MINORU NISHIO, YASUTOSHI MURAYAMA, SHUHEI KOMATSU, ATSUSHI SHIOZAKI, YOSHIAKI KURIU, HISASHI IKOMA, MASAYOSHI NAKANISHI, DAISUKE ICHIKAWA, HITOSHI FUJIWARA, KAZUMA OKAMOTO, TOSHIYA OCHIAI, YUKIHITO KOKUBA, TERUHISA SONOYAMA, EIGO OTSUJI
Anticancer Research Feb 2011, 31 (2) 495-500;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • 470 nm LED Irradiation Inhibits the Invasiveness of CD133-positive Human Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells by Suppressing the Cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin E2 Pathway
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Low-dose Andrographolide Synergizes With Cytarabine or Vincristine in Plasma Cell Neoplasm Cell Lines
  • Enzalutamide Enhanced Honokiol-induced Apoptotic Insults to Drug-resistant Glioblastoma Cells via an Intrinsic Bak-mitochondrion-caspase Cascade Mechanism
  • Milk Extracellular Vesicle–mediated Delivery of siPRNP Suppresses Growth and Wound Closure in PC-3M Prostate Cancer Cells
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire