Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Vitamin D in Colorectal, Breast, Prostate and Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study

PETR PAZDIORA, SARKA SVOBODOVA, RADKA FUCHSOVA, RADEK KUČERA, MARKETA PRAZAKOVA, JINDRA VRZALOVA, ANDREA NARSANSKA, MARKETA STRAKOVA, INKA TRESKOVA, LADISLAV PECEN, VLADISLAV TRESKA, LUBOS HOLUBEC, MILOS PESEK, JINDRICH FINEK and ONDREJ TOPOLCAN
Anticancer Research October 2011, 31 (10) 3619-3621;
PETR PAZDIORA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pazdiora{at}fnplzen.cz
SARKA SVOBODOVA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RADKA FUCHSOVA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RADEK KUČERA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARKETA PRAZAKOVA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JINDRA VRZALOVA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREA NARSANSKA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARKETA STRAKOVA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
INKA TRESKOVA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LADISLAV PECEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VLADISLAV TRESKA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUBOS HOLUBEC JR.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MILOS PESEK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JINDRICH FINEK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ONDREJ TOPOLCAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Many studies have demonstrated the relationship between vitamin D and cancer of many different sites, including of the breast, colorectum, prostate and lung. Most epidemiological studies have assessed the effects of dietary intake only, although endogenous production after sun exposure is the main source of vitamin D. The aim of our pilot study was to study serum levels of vitamin D in general population and in patients with different type of cancer. Patients and Methods: The control group consisted of 214 healthy individuals. Pathological groups of patients included 170 patients with different cancer types (28 patients with prostate cancer, 43 patients with breast cancer, 49 patients with colorectal cancer and 50 patients with lung cancer). All of the patients were enrolled in the early clinical stage of cancer up to clinical stage III. Advanced stages were not included into the study. Vitamin D serum levels were measured using ECLIA Roche method. Results: All the results for serum vitamin D from pathological groups were significantly lower compared to the levels of the control group. All the cancer types had a high incidence rate of very low serum levels of vitamin D. Lung cancer had the highest incidence rate of very low vitamin D serum levels. Conclusion: We found a high incidence of hypovitaminosis D in cancer patients compared to a healthy control group among a Czech population. This incidence rate is higher in comparison to data found in literature from the other parts of the world. Based on the data from this study, a large epidemiological study monitoring vitamin D serum levels in the healthy population and in cancer patients in the Czech Republic has been already proposed.

  • Vitamin D
  • colorectal cancer
  • breast cancer
  • prostate cancer
  • lung cancer

Vitamin D, especially in it's biologically most active form calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) is essential for the formation, growth, and repair of bones, for normal calcium absorption and for immune function. It is obtained primarily through exposure of the skin to ultraviolet radiation in sunlight, but it can also be obtained from some foods and dietary supplements. Vitamin D and its metabolites have always been important for treating vitamin D deficiency and disorders related to abnormal calcium homeostasis. But, association with other pathological abnormalities, particularly with cancer, has been also reported (1). The aim of our pilot study was to study serum levels of vitamin D in general population and in patients with different type of cancer.

Patients and Methods

Groups of patients. The control group: consisted of 214 healthy individuals. All of them underwent a complete medical examination. At the time of blood collection, there was no evidence of cancer or inflammatory disease in these people. Pathological groups of patients included 170 patients: 28 patients with prostate cancer, 43 patients with breast cancer, 49 patients with colorectal cancer and 50 patients with lung cancer. For their detailed descriptive statistic data see Table I. All of the patients were enrolled in the early clinical stage of cancer up to clinical stage III. Advanced stages were not included in the study. Serum samples were collected prior to any surgery. At this time patients have no oncological therapy and no vitamin D supplementation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Descriptive statistics of the patient groups.

Laboratory methods. Blood for the laboratory analysis was collected from the cubital vein in the morning after an 8-hour fasting period. Sera were separated at 1700× g far 10 min. Vitamin D serum levels were measured using the ECLIA Roche method (2). Serum samples were stored in aliquots at −80°C until the measurement.

Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics for vitamin D concentrations (N, median, min, max), for vitamin D concentrations categorized below low threshold, normal, above high (absolute and relative frequencies) were calculated. Descriptive statistics is also presented for age and gender. The statistical testing was done as two-tailed on the significance level of 5% for each testing. The pair-vise comparison of groups was done using Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum test because assumption of normality was remarkably violated for vitamin D concentrations. The test-for-trend option was selected in the chi-square test for comparison of categorized vitamin D concentrations (below low threshold, normal, above high) between groups.

Results

Results of serum levels of vitamin D are shown in Table II. It demonstrates that all the results from pathological groups are significantly lower compared to the levels of control group (p<0.0001 for all cancer by means of Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum test). There is a high incidence rate of very low serum levels in all the cancer groups. Table III shows the incidence of very low and low vitamin D serum levels as being significantly higher in cancer groups than in control group (p<0.0001 for all cancer by means of χ2-trend-test). There were no significant differences between the individual cancer groups found except for lung cancer (also with p<0.0001). This group significantly differed from the other cancer groups.

Discussion

The Czech Republic is the first country in terms of colorectal cancer incidence worldwide. The incidence of other malignant diseases is also very high. Moreover the Pilsner region has the highest incidence rate of all the cancer types in the Czech Republic. Therefore intensive research is targeted to the detailed description of potential mechanisms far this in order to use the result for the effective prevention of this disease. The first epidemiological studies from the 1940s demonstrated an inverse relationship between sunlight exposure levels in a given geographic area and the rates of incidence and death for certain types of non-skin cancer in that area. Because sunlight/UV exposure is necessary for the production of vitamin D, researchers hypothesized that variation in vitamin D levels accounted for the observed relationships (3-5). But the main focus on this issue can be dated to the end of the last century. Garland and Garland have been particularly dedicated to the problem of the relationship between vitamin D and cancer (6). The clinical use of vitamin D monitoring for colorectal cancer prevention has been described by Weinstein et al. (7), Feskanich et al. (8) and Ng et al. (9); for pancreatic cancer by Axanova et al. (10), Chiang and Chen (11); for breast cancer prevention by Colston and Hansen (12), Bertone-Johnson et al. (13), Welsh (14) and Shin et al. (15), and for prostate cancer by Chen and Holick (16). We have found that the low serum levels of vitamin D in cancer groups are more frequent, even in the early disease stages when compared with literature data. This can be explained by the higher incidence rate of cancer disease in the Czech Republic as well. The alarming results for the group with lung cancer supported our decision to initiate systematic vitamin D supplementation in accordance with literature guidelines. This decision was also supported by the report that low serum levels of vitamin D may diminish chemotherapy effect, described by Pelczynska et al. (17). Regular serum vitamin D monitoring every three months has also been implemented. Based on this pilot study and based on literature data (18, 19), vitamin D supplementation has been considered as a component of adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Serum levels of 25 (OH) vitamin D.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Incidence rate of different serum levels of 25 (OH) vitamin D in individual cancer types.

Conclusion

Considerable data of some preclinical studies suggest that there is a role for vitamin D in cancer therapy and prevention. Most of the studies report epidemiological data; no well–designed clinical trials of optimal administration of vitamin D as a cancer therapy have ever been conducted.

We found a high incidence of hypovitaminosis D in cancer patients compared with a healthy control group among the Czech population. This rate is higher in comparison to data found in literature for other parts of the world. Based on the data from this pilot study a large epidemiological study monitoring vitamin D serum levels in the healthy population and in cancer patients in the Czech Republic has already been proposed.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by VZ MSM 0021620819 and grants NS9727, NS10258, NT11017, NS1023 and NS10253.

  • Received July 4, 2011.
  • Revision received August 18, 2011.
  • Accepted August 19, 2011.
  • Copyright© 2011 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hansen CM,
    2. Binderup L,
    3. Hamberg KJ,
    4. Carlberg C
    : Vitamin D and cancer: effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 and its analogs on growth control and tumorigenesis. Front Biosci 6: D820-D848, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Hart GR,
    2. Furniss JL,
    3. Laurie D,
    4. Durham SK
    : Measurement of vitamin D status: background, clinical use, and methodologies. Clin Lab 52: 335-343, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lowe LC,
    2. Guy M,
    3. Mansi JL,
    4. Peckitt C,
    5. Bliss J,
    6. Wilson RG,
    7. Colston KW
    : Plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations vitamin D receptor genotype and breast cancer risk in a UK Caucasian population. Eur J Cancer 41: 1164-1169, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Aperly FL
    : The relation of solar radiation to cancer mortality in North America. Cancer Res 1: 191-195, 1941.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Forrest KY,
    2. Stuhldreher WL
    : Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in US adults. Nutr Res 31: 48-54, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Garland CF,
    2. Garland FC
    : Do sunlight and vitamin D reduce the likelihood of colon cancer? Int J Epidemiol 9: 227-231, 1980.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Weinstein SJ,
    2. Yu K,
    3. Horst RL,
    4. Ashby J,
    5. Virtamo J,
    6. Albanes D
    : Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risks of colon and rectal cancer in Finnish men. Am J Epidemiol 173: 499-508, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Feskanich D,
    2. Ma J,
    3. Fuchs CS,
    4. Kirkner GJ,
    5. Hankinson SE,
    6. Hollis BW,
    7. Giovannucci EL
    : Plasma vitamin D metabolites and risk for colorectal cancer in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13: 1502-1508, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Ng K,
    2. Wolpin BM,
    3. Meyerhardt JA,
    4. Wu K,
    5. Chan AT,
    6. Hollis BW,
    7. Giovannucci EL,
    8. Stampfer MJ,
    9. Willett WC,
    10. Fuchs CS
    : Prospective study of predictors of vitamin D status and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 29: 1599-1606, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Axanova LS,
    2. Chen YQ,
    3. McCoy T,
    4. Sui G,
    5. Cramer SD
    : 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) and PI3K/AKT inhibitors synergistically inhibit growth and induce senescence inprostate cancer cells. Prostate 70: 1658-1671, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Chiang KC,
    2. Chen TC
    : Vitamin D for the prevention and treatment of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 15: 3349-3354, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Colston KW,
    2. Hansen CM
    : Mechanisms implicated in the growth regulatory effects of vitamin D in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 9: 45-59, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    1. Bertone-Johnson ER,
    2. Chen WY,
    3. Holick MF,
    4. Hollis BW,
    5. Colditz GA,
    6. Willett WC,
    7. Hankinson SE
    : Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 1991-1997, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Welsh J
    : Vitamin D and breast cancer: insights from animal models. Am J Clin Nutr 80: 1721S-1724S, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Shin MH,
    2. Holmes MD,
    3. Hankinson SE,
    4. Wu K,
    5. Colditz GA,
    6. Willett WC
    : Intake of dairy products, calcium, and vitamin D and risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 1301-1311, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Chen TC,
    2. Holick MF
    : Vitamin D and prostate cancer prevention and treatment. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14: 423-430, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Pelczynska M,
    2. Switalska M,
    3. Maciejewska M,
    4. Jaroszewicz I,
    5. Kutner A,
    6. Opolski A
    : Antiproliferative activity of vitamin D compounds in combination with cytostatics. Anticancer Res 26: 2701-2705, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Deeb KK,
    2. Trump DL,
    3. Johnson CS
    : Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 7: 684-700, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Herr C,
    2. Greulich T,
    3. Koczulla RA,
    4. Meyer S,
    5. Zakharkina T,
    6. Branscheidt M,
    7. Eschmann R,
    8. Bals R
    : The role of vitamin D in pulmonary disease: COPD, asthma, infection, and cancer. Respir Res 12: 31, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 31, Issue 10
October 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vitamin D in Colorectal, Breast, Prostate and Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Vitamin D in Colorectal, Breast, Prostate and Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
PETR PAZDIORA, SARKA SVOBODOVA, RADKA FUCHSOVA, RADEK KUČERA, MARKETA PRAZAKOVA, JINDRA VRZALOVA, ANDREA NARSANSKA, MARKETA STRAKOVA, INKA TRESKOVA, LADISLAV PECEN, VLADISLAV TRESKA, LUBOS HOLUBEC, MILOS PESEK, JINDRICH FINEK, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN
Anticancer Research Oct 2011, 31 (10) 3619-3621;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Vitamin D in Colorectal, Breast, Prostate and Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
PETR PAZDIORA, SARKA SVOBODOVA, RADKA FUCHSOVA, RADEK KUČERA, MARKETA PRAZAKOVA, JINDRA VRZALOVA, ANDREA NARSANSKA, MARKETA STRAKOVA, INKA TRESKOVA, LADISLAV PECEN, VLADISLAV TRESKA, LUBOS HOLUBEC, MILOS PESEK, JINDRICH FINEK, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN
Anticancer Research Oct 2011, 31 (10) 3619-3621;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Effect of Serum Cotinine on Vitamin D Serum Concentrations Among American Females with Different Ethnic Backgrounds
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimizing Biopsy Decisions in PI-RADS 3-4 Lesions: Integrating PSA-derived Biomarkers to Reduce Unnecessary Procedures
  • Surgical Outcomes and Postoperative Changes in Nutritional Indexes and Sarcopenia Markers in Oldest-old Patients With Resected Biliary Tract Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Effect of Tissue Sample Type on The Evaluation of PD-L1 (SP142) Expression in Breast Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire