Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Feulgen Staining Remains the Gold Standard for Precise DNA Image Cytometry

STEFAN BIESTERFELD, SASCHA BECKERS, MARIA DEL CARMEN VILLA CADENAS and MARTIN SCHRAMM
Anticancer Research January 2011, 31 (1) 53-58;
STEFAN BIESTERFELD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Stefan.Biesterfeld@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
SASCHA BECKERS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA DEL CARMEN VILLA CADENAS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARTIN SCHRAMM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: The suitability of Papanicolaou staining and of hematoxylin staining for DNA single-cell cytometry was investigated in comparison to Feulgen staining. Materials and Methods: Ten normal cervical smears and ten cervical smears containing cells of a squamous cell carcinoma in situ were analyzed. The integrated optical density (IOD) of 200 epithelial cells, chosen per random, was determined using a CM-1 TV-image analysis system (Hund, Wetzlar, Germany). Various DNA cytometric variables, accepted by the European Society for Analytical and Cellular Pathology (ESACP), and the mean nuclear area were calculated. Two measurements were performed after Papanicolaou staining (wavelengths: 530 nm and 590 nm), followed by measurements after hematoxylin re-staining (wavelength: 590 nm) and after Feulgen restaining (wavelength: 570 nm). Results: All histograms of Feulgen-stained normal squamous epithelia revealed a regular DNA distribution. The corresponding histograms after Papanicolaou staining or hematoxylin staining showed a wide scatter of values instead of a clear-cut diploid peak and an increased number of values >4c. Similar findings were observed in the carcinomatous smears. In particular, the mean values of the dispersion parameters (2cDI, entropy, ploidy imbalance and 2,5cEE) were significantly increased as compared to Feulgen staining. Conclusion: Diagnostic or prognostic conclusions cannot be drawn from DNA measurements on Papanicolaou-stained or hematoxylin-stained specimens; Feulgen staining remains the gold standard for such purposes.

  • DNA ploidy
  • image analysis
  • cytometry
  • cytology
  • hematoxylin staining
  • Feulgen staining
  • Papanicolaou staining

During recent years DNA single cell cytometry has become well-established in tumor pathology as being diagnostically useful. In various types of tissues, malignant transformation has been predicted with its use both in squamous and in glandular lesions (1-15). In our institution, this method is frequently used for the detection of DNA aneuploidy in diagnostically difficult or doubtful cases, for example, in brush biopsies of the bile ducts, the oral cavity or the uterine cervix. However, precise densitometric measurements may only be expected if the amount of the dye bound per nucleus is proportional to its DNA content. In the visible light spectrum, only the Feulgen reaction (16-18) has been accepted as a stoichiometric procedure for exclusive staining of nuclear DNA in a reproducible, standardized manner (19, 20), and the discussion of whether also other staining methods (21-25) are appropriate for diagnostic measurements appears to have come to an end. Recently, however, we were surprisingly asked again for diagnostic advice on measurements on Papanicolaou-stained specimens. Thus, we felt encouraged to perform a systematic investigation on the correlation of densitometric measurement results between Feulgen staining, Papanicolaou staining and hematoxylin staining, for the first time considering those DNA cytometric variables that have been accepted by the consensus of the European Society for Analytical and Cellular Pathology (ESACP) (26, 27) as being clinically useful.

Materials and Methods

Cytological material. Twenty technically excellent routine cytological smears from the uterine cervix were investigated. Ten cases represented normal ectocervical squamous epithelium with only slight degree of inflammation (‘negative’). The other ten cases revealed cells of a squamous cell carcinoma in situ (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, HSIL; ‘positive’).

Staining protocols. The immediately ethanol-fixed specimens were received unstained by our institution. The routine cytological diagnoses were made after Papanicolaou staining. Later, hematoxylin staining and Feulgen staining (19) were applied to the identical slides after removing the coverslips by xylene incubation for some hours. All staining procedures were performed on a Shandon Varistain staining machine using standard protocols.

Densitometric measurements. The integrated optical density and the nuclear area of 200 normal intermediate squamous cells per negative case or 200 HSIL cells per positive case were measured using a CM-1 TV image analysis system with appropriate electronic correction of stray light and shading (Hund, Wetzlar, Germany), described in detail elsewhere (28). For all measurements, a 40× objective magnification was used. The median value of 20 normal intermediate squamous cells served as a measurement-specific internal standard for the normal diploid value (error of the mean of the reference cell population: <3%). Obviously distorted or overlapping cell nuclei were excluded from the measurements. A relocalization function that would have enabled us to measure identical cells was not available. However, we defined diagnostic regions of interest (ROI) on the coverslips of the Papanicolaou-stained slides using a water-resistant permanent marker. The markings were transferred to the new coverslips after hematoxylin staining or Feulgen staining, respectively. Thus, all measurements were performed on nuclei of the identical ROIs.

The respective measurements were performed using interference filters in the absorption maximum of the nuclear staining (20, 29, 30). Firstly, the original Papanicolaou-stained slides were analyzed at a wavelength of 530 nm, representing the first nuclear absorption maximum and the maximum difference between the absorbance curves of nucleus and cytoplasm of squamous epithelium. Afterwards, the Papanicolaou-stained slides were analyzed using a wavelength of 590 nm in the second nuclear absorption maximum of normal squamous epithelium, at which the contrast between nucleus and cytoplasm reaches a maximum value. After hematoxylin staining, the third measurement was performed at a wavelength of 590 nm. For the fourth measurement, after Feulgen staining a common 570 nm interference filter was used which corresponds to the absorption maximum of parafuchsin. All three interference filters had a halfwidth of ±10 nm.

The results of the measurements were documented in frequency histograms, and the mean nuclear area and various DNA cytometric parameters according to the consensus reports of the ESACP (26, 27) were calculated: (i) The DNA stemline ploidy, calculated as the highest peak of the data distribution, representing the G0/G1 fraction of the cell population. The DNA stemline was interpreted as aneuploid if a comparison of the G0/G1 fractions of the reference cells and the analyzed cells resulted in a highly significant difference (p<0.001) in the Kolmogoroff-Smirnov test and if the DNA stemline ploidy was <1.85c or >2.15c. (ii) The coefficient of variation of the DNA stemline ploidy. (iii) The mean ploidy. (iv) The 2c Deviation Index (2cDI), representing the variance of the cell population around the normal 2c value (31). (v) The entropy the DNA distribution (32), basing on 80 DNA classes of 0.2c width (0c-16c). (vi) The ploidy imbalance (9). (vii) The 2.5c-, 3c-, 4c-, 5c-, 7c- and 9c-exceeding events (2.5c EE, 3c EE, 4c EE, 5c EE, 7c EE, 9c EE), defined as the number of nuclei with a DNA content above the respective levels.

Statistics. For each parameter and each type of measurement, mean values and standard deviations were calculated separately for normal cases and HSIL cases. Additionally, the coefficient of correlation (r) and Spearman's rank coefficient of correlation (rs) was calculated. For further statistical analysis of the data distribution, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used. The data presentation of the U-test was restricted to the comparison between the measurements after Feulgen staining as gold standard and the three different further measurements after routine staining. Statistical significance was accepted for p<0.05.

Results

Negative cases. Analyzing the histograms graphically, measurements after Feulgen staining revealed a clear-cut diploid DNA distribution pattern as would be expected for normal non-neoplastic epithelium, i.e. a well-defined DNA-stemline with modal values around 2c (G0/G1-phase), accompanied by ≤10% of cells between 2c and 4c (S-phase) and only <5% of the cells around the 4c level (G2/M-phase). After Papanicolaou or hematoxylin staining, however, the histograms showed a wider variation of the single values sometimes with more ill-defined stemlines, resulting in higher mean CVs of the stemline ploidy (6.67% (Feulgen staining) vs. 15.58%-19.42%). A false-positive aneuploid stemline interpretation had to be considered in 15 measurements after Papanicolaou- or hematoxylin staining (15/30, 50%). Representative histograms are shown in Figure 1.

The mean values and the standard deviations of the cytometric and morphometric variables are presented in detail in Table I. In spite of the frequent false positive diagnoses, the mean values of the stemline ploidy and also of the mean ploidy were quite well comparable between the four types of measurements. Comparing the Feulgen staining with the other methods, it became obvious that the mean values of the dispersion parameters (2cDI, entropy, ploidy imbalance and 2.5c EE) were lowest after Feulgen staining, indicating a significantly different data distribution (U-test: 0.0001≤p≤0.0002, Table II). Rare events (5c EE, 7c EE, 9c EE) were not present at all after Feulgen staining, but were detected rarely in the other three types of measurement. The high coefficients of correlation for the comparison of the mean nuclear area values (0.880≤r≤0.871 and 0.842≤rs≤0.952, Table II) indicate that indeed cells from an identical population have been analyzed in the four measurements (U-test: p>0.05).

Positive cases. The mean values and the standard deviations of the cytometric and morphometric variables show two different trends (Table I). On the one hand, in comparison to the results of the measurements after Feulgen staining, the mean values for the stemline ploidy and the mean ploidy were slightly lower after Papanicolaou staining and hematoxylin staining. On the other hand, the mean values of the dispersion parameters 2cDI, entropy, ploidy imbalance and 2.5c EE, and also the CV of the stemline ploidy, were lower after Feulgen staining, indicating a more scattered distribution of the single values. Some of these differences were statistically significant in the U-test (0.0012≤p>0.05). High coefficients of correlation for the comparison of the mean nuclear area values were also found for the group of positive cases (0.671≤r≤0.834 and 0.806≤rs≤0.952, U-test: p>0.05, Table II).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Representative histograms of normal cervical squamous epithelium after different staining procedures. Abscissa: DNA ploidy equivalent in 0.2c classes, ordinate: number of nuclei per class. In comparison to Feulgen staining, a more scattered data distribution becomes obvious for measurements after Papanicolaou staining and hematoxylin staining.

Discussion

The Feulgen reaction is generally accepted as a stoichiometric DNA staining method (17, 20, 33-35), although the chemical processes are only partly understood. In brief, in a first step, the DNA is submitted to mild acid hydrolysis (36) to split off the purine bases from the double-stranded DNA. The result is an apurinic acid presenting reactable aldehyde groups at the C1-position. In a second step, a Schiff's base binds stoichiometrically to these aldehyde groups and produces a reddish to blueish-violet colour with an absorption maximum of 545 nm. In the present study, we investigated systematically if this standard DNA staining procedure may be replaced by Papanicolaou staining, which is routinely performed in daily cytopathology, or by hematoxylin staining. The clinical background were requests by two clinical groups who had analyzed some Papanicolaou-stained specimens which had presented histograms which were difficult to interpret. Analyzing the literature, it became obvious that only Feulgen staining has been accepted for DNA cytometric measurements up to now. However, there were only few data for this recommendation (24, 37), and the results were based on DNA stemline interpretation exclusively.

Our results on ten normal cervical specimens confirm that Feulgen staining leads to clearly interpretable DNA histograms, while measurements after Papanicolaou or hematoxylin staining reveal a much broader and thus less distinct data distribution (Figure 1), and no ESACP-accepted variable could be identified for a Feulgen-comparable data interpretation (Table I). Similar findings occurred in the group of positive cases (Table II). Thus, Papanicolaou-stained or hematoxylin-stained cervical smears could not be interpreted correctly concerning nuclear DNA contents. The respective values after Papanicolaou staining or hematoxylin staining deviated so clearly that no reliable diagnostic conclusions may be drawn.

Our findings on Papanicolaou-stained slides correlate well to those of the only systematic study on that subject (37) analyzing the CV of the DNA stemline ploidy in different cell populations. For diploid rat hepatocytes, for example, the CVs were 4.8% after Feulgen staining and 23.0% after Papanicolaou staining. For mesothelial cells, the respective values were 9.2% and 26.8%. In cell suspensions of ovarian cystadenofibroma (CV after Feulgen staining: 8.7%) and of ovarian cystadenocarcinoma (CV after Feulgen staining: 13.3%), a loss of the DNA stemline was observed after Papanicolaou staining. The higher CV values of the stemlines correspond to a wider scatter of the DNA values after Papanicolaou staining, as was also be observed in our study. To our knowledge only one study has been performed on quantitative densitometric measurements on hematoxylin-stained slides (24). The authors analyzed the stoichiometry of hematoxylin staining on tissue imprints of freshly cut rabbit liver and found a significant disproportionality for the mean integrated optical density values at the 2c-, 4c- or 8c-position, which was not present after Feulgen staining.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Mean values and standard deviations of densitometric variables in 10 cases of normal cervical squamous epithelium (‘negative’) and 10 cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma in situ (‘positive’) for four different staining- and measurement procedures.

In conclusion, our investigation confirms that DNA cytometric measurements on Papanicolaou-stained specimens or hematoxylin-stained specimens cannot be recommended, as the histograms and the various ESACP-accepted DNA-cytometric parameters, systematically evaluated in our study for the first time, cannot be interpreted reliably, due to the lack of stoichiometry of nuclear staining. However, Feulgen re-staining of routinely stained slides has proven to be reliable: In a study on the DNA stemline ploidy (diploid vs. aneuploid) on 40 fresh specimens of breast carcinomas, cytological preparations stained directly according to Feulgen and smears from the same tumors which were Feulgen-stained after previous Papanicolaou staining were compared (38). The authors reported a concordance rate of 82% (r=0.736, p<0.001) between both staining procedures. Papanicolaou re-staining of Feulgen-stained slides for cytological re-evaluation also leads to morphologically well interpretable staining results in our experience.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Coefficients of variation (r), Spearman's rank coefficient of correlation (rs) and p-values of the Mann-Whitney U-test between the densitometric variables, each comparing one of the three test staining and measurement procedures with Feulgen staining (570 nm) as a gold standard.

  • Received September 15, 2010.
  • Revision received November 26, 2010.
  • Accepted November 29, 2010.
  • Copyright© 2011 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Remmerbach TW,
    2. Weidenbach H,
    3. Pomjanski N,
    4. Knops K,
    5. Mathes S,
    6. Hemprich A,
    7. Böcking A
    : Cytologic and DNA-cytometric early diagnosis of oral cancer. Anal Cell Pathol 22: 211-221, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Maraki D,
    2. Yalcinkaya S,
    3. Pomjanski N,
    4. Megahed M,
    5. Böcking A,
    6. Becker J
    : Cytologic and DNA-cytometric examination of oral lesions in lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med 35: 227-232, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Crissman JD,
    2. Zarbo RJ
    : Quantitation of DNA ploidy in squamous intraepithelial neoplasia of the laryngeal glottis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117: 182-188, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Auffermann W,
    2. Böcking A
    : Early detection of precancerous lesions in dysplasias of the lung by rapid DNA image cytometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 7: 218-226, 1985.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Evans AS,
    2. Monaghan JM,
    3. Anderson MC
    : A nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid analysis of normal and abnormal vulvar epithelium. Obstetr Gynecol 69: 790-793, 1987.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Chatelain R,
    2. Schunck T,
    3. Schindler E,
    4. Schindler A,
    5. Böcking A
    : Diagnosis of prospective malignancy in koilocytic dysplasias of the uterine cervix with DNA cytometry. J Reprod Med 34: 505-510, 1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Biesterfeld S,
    2. Pennings K,
    3. Grußendorf-Conen EI,
    4. Böcking A
    : Aneuploidy in actinic keratosis and Bowen's disease – Increased risk for invasive squamous cell carcinoma? Br J Dermatol 133: 557-560, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Janisson-Dargaud D,
    2. Durlach A,
    3. Lorenzato M,
    4. Grange F,
    5. Bernard P,
    6. Birembaut P
    : Aneuploidy, but not Ki-67 or EGFR expression, is associated with recurrences in basal cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol 35: 916-921, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Biesterfeld S,
    2. Leitloff M,
    3. Rath W,
    4. Schröder W
    : DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial adenocarcinoma. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 23: 123-128, 2001.
    OpenUrl
    1. Biesterfeld S,
    2. Reus K,
    3. Bayer-Pietsch E,
    4. Mihalcea AM,
    5. Böcking A
    : DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Cancer 93: 160-164, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lorenzato M,
    2. Caudroy S,
    3. Nou JM,
    4. Dalstein V,
    5. Joseph K,
    6. Bellefqih S,
    7. Durlach A,
    8. Thil C,
    9. Dez F,
    10. Bouttens D,
    11. Clavel C,
    12. Birembaut P
    : Contribution of DNA ploidy image cytometry to the management of ASC cervical lesions. Cancer 114: 263-269, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Biesterfeld S,
    2. Deacu L
    : DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions of the bile duct, the pancreatic duct and the papilla of Vater. Anticancer Res 29: 1579-1584, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fang M,
    2. Lew W,
    3. Klein M,
    4. Sebo T,
    5. Su Y,
    6. Goyal R
    : DNA abnormalities as marker of risk for progression of Barrett's esophagus to adenocarcinoma: image cytometric DNA analysis in formalin-fixed tissues. Am J Gastroenterol 99: 1887-1894, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dunn JM,
    2. Mackenzie GD,
    3. Oukrif D,
    4. Mosse CA,
    5. Banks MR,
    6. Thorpe S,
    7. Sasieni P,
    8. Bown SG,
    9. Novelli MR,
    10. Rabinovitch PS,
    11. Lovat LB
    : Image cytometry accurately detects DNA ploidy abnormalities and predicts late relapse to high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus following photodynamic therapy. Br J Cancer 25: 1608-1617, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Huang Q,
    3. Goyal RK,
    4. Odze RD
    : DNA ploidy abnormalities in basal and superficial regions of the crypts in Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplastic lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 32: 1327-1335, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Feulgen R,
    2. Rossenbeck H
    : Mikroskopisch-chemischer Nachweis einer Nucleinsäure vom Typus der Thymonucleinsäure und die darauf beruhende elektive Färbung von Zellkernen in mikroskopischen Präparaten. Hoppe Seyler's Z Physiol Chem 135: 203-248, 1924.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Schulte E,
    2. Wittekind D
    : Standardization of the Feulgen-Schiff technique: staining characteristics of pure fuchsin dyes. Histochemistry 91: 321-331, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chieco P,
    2. Derenzini M
    : The Feulgen reaction 75 years on. Histochem Cell Biol 111: 345-358, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Chatelain R,
    2. Willms A,
    3. Biesterfeld S,
    4. Auffermann W,
    5. Böcking A
    : Automated Feulgen staining with a temperature-controlled machine. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11: 211-217, 1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Graumann W
    : Zur Standardisierung des Schiff'schen Reagens. Z Wiss Mikros 61: 225-226, 1953.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Bahr GF,
    2. Bartels PH,
    3. Bibbo M,
    4. de Nicolas M,
    5. Wied GL
    : Evaluation of the Papanicolaou stain for computer-assisted cellular pattern recognition. Acta Cytol 17: 106-112, 1973.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Wied GL
    1. Bibbo M,
    2. Bartels PH,
    3. Dytch HE,
    4. Wied GL
    : Computed cell image information. In: Monographs in Clinical Cytology Wied GL (ed.), Karger, Basel, pp. 62-100, 1984.
    1. Husain O,
    2. Watts K
    : Rapid demonstration of nucleic acids using ‘oxidised’ gallocyanin and chromic potassium sulphate: methods and applications. J Clin Pathol 37: 99-101, 1984.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Schulte EKW,
    2. Fink DK
    : Hematoxylin staining in quantitative DNA cytometry: an image analysis study. Anal Cellul Pathol 9: 257-268, 1995.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Schulte E,
    2. Wittekind D
    : Victoria blue B – a nuclear stain for cytology. Histochemistry 88: 427-433, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Haroske G,
    2. Giroud F,
    3. Reith A,
    4. Böcking A
    : 1997 ESACP consensus report on diagnostic image cytometry. Part I: Basic considerations and recommendations for preparation, measurement and interpretation. Anal Cellul Pathol 17: 189-200, 1998.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Haroske G,
    2. Baak JPA,
    3. Danielsen H,
    4. Giroud F,
    5. Gschwendtner A,
    6. Oberholzer M,
    7. Reith A,
    8. Spieler P,
    9. Böcking A
    : Fourth updated ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 23: 89-95, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Wied GL,
    2. Bartels PH,
    3. Rosenthal DL,
    4. Schenck U
    1. Müller HW,
    2. Böcking A,
    3. Auer H
    : TV cytometer CM-1 for computer aided tumor diagnosis. In: Compendium of the Computerized Cytologic and Histologic Laboratory. Tutorials of Cytology, Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenck U (eds.). Chicago, USA, pp. 376-388, 1994.
  15. ↵
    1. Galbraith W,
    2. Marshall PN,
    3. Lee ES,
    4. Bacus JW
    : Studies on Papanicolaou staining. Anal Quant Cytol 1: 160-168, 1979.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Green FJ
    : The Sigma-Aldrich Handbook of Stains, Dyes and Indicators. Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., Milwaukee, 1990.
  17. ↵
    1. Böcking A,
    2. Adler CP,
    3. Common HH,
    4. Hilgarth M,
    5. Granzen B,
    6. Auffermann W
    : Algorithm for a DNA-cytophotometric diagnosis and grading of malignancy. Anal Quant Cytol 6: 1-8, 1984.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Stenkvist B,
    2. Olding-Stenkvist E
    : Cytological and DNA characteristics of hyperplasia, inflammation and cancer of the prostate. Eur J Cancer 26: 261-267, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Andersson GKA,
    2. Kjellstrand PTT
    : Exposure and removal of stainable groups during Feulgen acid hydrolysis of fixed chromatin at different temperature. Histochemie 27: 165-172, 1971.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Deitch AD,
    2. Wagner D,
    3. Richart RM
    : Conditions influencing the intensity of the Feulgen reaction. J Histochem Cytochem 16: 371-379, 1968.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kjellstrand P
    : Mechanisms of the Feulgen acid hydrolysis. J Microsc 119: 391-396, 1980.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Böhm N,
    2. Sprenger E,
    3. Schlüter G,
    4. Sandritter W
    : Proportionalitätsfehler bei der Feulgen-Hydrolyse. Histochemie 15: 194-203, 1968.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Gurley AM,
    2. Hidvegi DF,
    3. Bacus JW,
    4. Bacus SS
    : Comparison of the Papanicolaou and Feulgen staining methods for DNA quantification by image analysis. Cytometry 11: 468-474, 1990.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Sidoni A,
    2. Cavaliere A,
    3. Alunno P,
    4. Bucciarelli E
    : DNA-ploidy studies on cytological preparations from breast cancers by image analysis: comparison with Feulgen staining performed in destained Papanicolaou slides. Cytometry 26: 293-297, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 31 (1)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 31, Issue 1
January 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feulgen Staining Remains the Gold Standard for Precise DNA Image Cytometry
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Feulgen Staining Remains the Gold Standard for Precise DNA Image Cytometry
STEFAN BIESTERFELD, SASCHA BECKERS, MARIA DEL CARMEN VILLA CADENAS, MARTIN SCHRAMM
Anticancer Research Jan 2011, 31 (1) 53-58;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Feulgen Staining Remains the Gold Standard for Precise DNA Image Cytometry
STEFAN BIESTERFELD, SASCHA BECKERS, MARIA DEL CARMEN VILLA CADENAS, MARTIN SCHRAMM
Anticancer Research Jan 2011, 31 (1) 53-58;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical Evaluation of DNA Ploidy for the Triage of HPV-Positive Chinese Women During Cervical Cancer Screening
  • The eutheria-specific miR-290 cluster modulates placental growth and maternal-fetal transport
  • Nuclear DNA Content Varies with Cell Size across Human Cell Types
  • Aurora-A Inhibition Offers a Novel Therapy Effective against Intracranial Glioblastoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ubiquitin-proteasome Pathway-linked Gene Signatures as Prognostic Indicators in Prostate Cancer
  • SH003 Inhibits Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Through the RTK-STAT3 Pathway
  • Advantages and Disadvantages of Drug Combination Treatment: Riluzole, Metformin and Dexamethasone Effect on Glioblastoma Cell
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire