Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Parameters of Biological Activity in Colorectal Cancer

SARKA SVOBODOVA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, LUBOS HOLUBEC, MIROSLAV LEVY, LADISLAV PECEN and STEPAN SVACINA
Anticancer Research January 2011, 31 (1) 373-378;
SARKA SVOBODOVA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: s.svobodova@volny.cz
ONDREJ TOPOLCAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUBOS HOLUBEC JR.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIROSLAV LEVY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LADISLAV PECEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEPAN SVACINA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to measure several parameters in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) and to evaluate them for their utility in routine clinical practice. Patients and Methods: Pre-operative serum levels of the following parameters were measured in 174 patients with CRC (clinical stage I-III): carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen CA 19-9, proliferative marker thymidine kinase (TK), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), C-peptide, insulin, adiponectin and leptin. The control group consisted of 50 patients who were undergoing a complete preventive medical examination and in these patients at the time of blood collection there was no evidence of any cancer disease. Results: Significant increase of the following parameters was found in patients with CRC: CEA, CA 19-9, TPA, IL-6, IL-10, TIMP-1, C-peptide, insulin and adiponectin. Only two of these, CA 19-9 and adiponectin, represent highly unfavorable prognostic factors. If elevated, they affect both progression-free interval and overall survival. Conclusion: Based on our results, we can conclude that none of the measured parameters fulfills the criteria for use for screening nor for primary diagnosis of CRC. Some of the parameters are important for prognosis estimate: Elevated CA 19-9 is related to an unfavorable prognosis, in terms of cancer recurrence and mortality rate. Angiogenetic factor VEGF represents a prognostic factor important for OS. CEA represents a parameter which is related to disease progression. Interleukins seem to be prospective complementary tumor markers. Adiponectin may be used for estimation of advanced stage of cancer and for estimate of risk of cancer recurrence.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • biological activity
  • tumor markers
  • angiogenetic factors
  • metalloproteinases
  • adhesion molecules

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered as the most frequent cancer disease based on prevalence and mortality rates (1, 2). CRC represents 12.1% of all cancer cases in men and 13.7% in woman in the Czech Republic (3).

Most cases of CRC are diagnosed very late in the Czech Republic: 45% of cases in males and 47% in females are diagnosed in clinical stage III or IV. This is a very unsatisfactory situation, as earlier diagnosis allows better therapy outcome. The Czech Republic holds the first position in mortality for CRC worldwide (52.7 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants) (3).

Some experimental studies are involved in understanding the complex characteristics of carcinogenesis and of the metastatic cascade process (4). Detailed description of genes and their protein products (5) that affect the metastatic process are very important, particularly for new drugs and therapy approaches that would result in regulation of different phases of cellular mitosis and growth.

Many new laboratory tests and techniques such as multiplex methods or microarrays for early detection of CRC have been developed recently. Not many of them have been implemented for daily routine clinical practice as yet. The aim of this study was to measure a large spectrum of parameters in patients with non-mestastatic CRC and to evaluate their utility for routine practice, as they may eventually play a regulatory role in cancer development. Most of the parameters currently evaluated in relationship to cancer have already been associated with other clinical conditions (e.g. inflammation or autoimmune reactions). Therefore they are generally called parameters of biological activity instead of tumor markers.

Patients and Methods

Cancer patient group. A total of 174 patients with CRC operated on at the Surgical Department of Thomayer's Teaching Hospital in Prague and at the Department of Surgery, Teaching Hospital in Pilsen up to 2006 were included in order to obtain a full 2-year follow-up period. Inclusion criteria included clinical stage I-III (according to the UICC criteria) (6) and R0 resection (i.e. no residual tumor). Patients were monitored for the follow-up period at the Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy of Thomayer's Teaching Hospital in Prague and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen. Date of progression was established as the date of first clinical examination where relapse or progression was confirmed (using physical examination, laboratory assessment or imaging techniques). All of the patients were assessed for their current clinical status at the termination of the clinical study. Only 36 patients died during the study and only 24 patients had a progression. This can be explained by the fact that patients with clinical stage IV were excluded. All of the patients completed a 2-year follow-up period, some of them have even completed a 5-year period.

All the patients were assessed for medical history of metabolic diseases and cancer and the presence of different risk factors for CRC. Basic descriptive characteristics of the group of patients are shown in Table I. Serum samples were collected prior to surgery.

Control group. The control group consisted of 50 individuals who were undergoing a complete medical examination at the Department of Preventive Cardiology. At the time of blood collection, there was no evidence of any cancer disease. In order to rule out polymorbidity of these individuals, the mean age of this group is lower than the mean age of pathological group, but the body mass index (BMI) and other metabolic conditions were corresponding. Basic descriptive characteristics of the control group are also shown in Table I.

Laboratory analysis. Blood for the laboratory assessment was collected from the cubital vein in the morning after an 8-hour fasting period. Sera were separated by centrifugation at 1700× g 10 min and all specimens were separated into several aliquots, immediately deep frozen and stored at −75°C until laboratory analysis. All the parameters were measured at the Department of Nuclear Medicine in Pilsen, using commercially available immunoassay kits. Most of the tests were also analyzed using multiplex analysis (xMAP technology using a Luminex 100 instrument; Luminex Corp., USA), therefore a large spectrum of tests were performed on every blood sample. The list of measured parameters is shown in Table II.

Additional routine biochemical laboratory tests were performed in order to rule out the presence of clinical conditions that may affect the serum levels of the measured parameters (i.e. serious renal or liver failure).

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis Software (S.A.S.) release 8.02 and STATISTICA software, release 5.1. Basic descriptive statistic parameters for the total group of patients were estimated: mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum. Wilcoxon two-sample test was used for comparison of distribution of individual parameters. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used for correlation between individual parameters. Sensitivities and specifities in the control group were calculated for optimal reference intervals (cut-off) for individual parameters. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free interval (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Basic descriptive statistics of pathological and control groups.

Results

Results of all the measured parameters are shown in Table III for both control and CRC patient groups. Correlations between the individual parameters were calculated for both groups separately. Statistically significant correlations are shown in Table IV. For prognosis estimation, the Cox regression model was used and the results for OS are shown in Table V and the results those for PFS is shown in Table VI.

This study was unique based on the number of patients included in this study in early-stage CRC. Most other published data include a high percentage of patients with metastatic CRC. This study is also unique from the point of the large spectrum of the measured parameters. It represents one of the first projects where most of the parameters were measured using multiplexed technology. Most of the data on multiplexed technology are related to ovarian, breast and prostate cancer (21-23). We found a significant increase of CEA in the CRC group. This parameter can be considered as a prognostic factor for PFS but not for OS. CA 19-9 was significantly elevated in the CRC group and is an unfavorable prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. The elevation of TPA may be related to cell mitosis and cytoskeleton disintegration. Elevated levels above cut-off significantly increase the risk for cancer recurrence. It seems that TPA is more specific for CRC than is TPS. Interleukins IL-6 and IL-10 were both significantly elevated in the group of CRC. This supports the theory of their potential inflammatory role in cancer development. TIMP-1 was significantly elevated in the CRC group. This is related to its biological proliferative and anti-apoptotic activity. C-Peptide and insulin changes are related to insulin resistance and result in cellular proliferation and apoptosis inhibition. Our results from adiponectin related to the fact that only patients with early stage of CRC were included. Serum levels of adiponectin correlated with prognosis (PFS).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Parameters used for laboratory analysis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Comparison of parameters of biological activity between colorectal cancer patients (N=174) and control group of healthy individuals (N=50). Wilcoxon test.

We did not find any significant changes of TPS, adhesion molecules, angiogenetic factors or leptin.

We did find significant differences between the control and CRC groups in correlations between the individual parameters: In the CRC group, there was a correlation between CEA and CA 19-9, TK and CA 19-9, TPA, TPS, TIMP-1 and C-peptide, i.e. between all the parameters that play an important role in the process of proliferation. No similar correlation was found in the control group. In the control group, correlations, between cytokeratines and adhesion molecules were found. Correlation between metabolic parameters was found in both groups. There was a significant correlation between leptin, C-peptide and insulin in the CRC group. More significant correlations were found between metabolic parameters and BMI in the control group. Based on our results, we can conclude that there are different mechanisms regulating cellular growth between the two groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Statistically significant correlations between individual parameters.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Cox regression model for overall survival (univariate analysis) arranged according to p-value.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Cox regression model for progression-free interval (univarate analysis) arranged according to p-value.

When evaluating the sensitivities and specifities of the individual parameters, we found the best sensitivity to be for IL-10 (higher than 50% at 95% specificity). This could be potentially considered for use as a complementary marker. We found very low sensitivity for CEA and CA 19-9, even at 90% specificity. This fully corresponds to the literature data (19, 20).

Discussion

The article from Hundt et al. from 2007 provides a complete review of clinical trials published up to 2007 (7). From this review, it can be seen that there have been many different parameters of biological activity implemented for CRC. Different studies included different sizes of patient groups, different cut-offs of the parameters and different sensitivity and specificity. No official guidelines for the interpretation of such new tests have been issued as yet. Compared to this review article, our clinical study represents one of the largest based on both the size of the patient group and the large spectrum of the parameters. Many discussions have been already published on conventional tumor markers and CRC, therefore we focused on new parameters of the biological activity of tumors.

We found significantly higher serum levels of TIMP-1 in the CRC group. This may be explained by the fact that most of our patients were enrolled in the very early stages of CRC, when TIMP might predominate over the effect of MMP. Data from other clinical studies provide very inconsistent results. Similar results were obtained by Holten-Andersen in 2002 (8). Some authors claim a stimulatory effect of TIMP-1 on cellular growth (9, 10), others describe its inhibitory effects on apoptosis (11, 12).

Metabolic parameters have been studied for many years as risk factors for CRC development (13). The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) has confirmed that insulin resistance (defined by increased C-peptide serum levels) is associated with an increased risk for CRC development (14). Insulin regulates energy metabolism, stimulates cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis. Elevated circulating serum levels of insulin result in increased bioactivity of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and a decrease in its binding proteins. There have only been few publications about the serum levels of insulin and C-peptide at the time of cancer development. We have found significant differences in the serum levels of insulin and C-peptide between the CRC and control group, but we found no relationship between elevated serum levels and PFS or OS.

Many publications have been dedicated to adiponectin serum level and its relationship to increased risk for CRC. It was proven that the lower the serum level of adiponectin, the higher the risk for CRC development (15). There are only few publications related to the serum level changes in patients with CRC. Our results show that patients with CRC have higher serum levels of adiponectin compared to the healthy control group. This appears to be slightly controversial compared with some literature data. Ferroni et al. from 2007 showed that low serum levels are found particularly in advanced CRC and this predicts an increased risk for disease recurrence (16). The median value of our control group corresponds to the median in this publication (12.4 vs. 13.1 μg/ml). Our pathological group of patients with CRC included only patients with early stage CRC; therefore, we also found a low recurrence rate in this group. We also found that the higher the serum level of adiponectin, the better the survival and the lower the risk for disease recurrence. Our finding corresponds to those from another study, where the authors found that adiponectin inhibits growth of cancer cells on tissue cultures via AMP-activated protein kinase activation (17). Therefore it seems that serum levels of adiponectin are important for perspective estimate and for estimate of disease stage, although such a test has not been performed routinely. Some publications on the dynamic changes of serum levels in the postoperative period have appeared recently. Low serum levels of adiponectin in the postoperative period increase the risk of postoperative inflammatory complications in CRC (18). There was very low incidence rate of inflammatory complications in own study and no serum levels were measured postoperatively.

Table IV shows all statistically significant correlations, where the p-value was lower than 0.01. There was no parameter with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.8000. Based on these results, we can conclude that no parameter could be replaced by another, but the existence of significant correlation supports the theory of a regulatory mechanism between the parameters. Correlation between the parameters of biological activity was found only in the CRC group. In particular, correlation between parameters related to the proliferative activity were found (TK vs. TPA, TK vs.TPS, TPA vs. TPS; see Table IV).

Better correlation between metabolic parameters was found in the healthy control group, but the correlation between leptin and C-peptide or insulin was more significant in the CRC group than in the control group. This is related to the insulin resistance and its potential role in CRC development.

Based on our results, we can conclude that none of the measured parameters fulfills the criteria for use for screening nor for primary diagnosis of CRC. Some of the parameters are important for prognosis estimate: Elevated CA 19-9 is related to an unfavorable prognosis, in terms of cancer recurrence and mortality rate. Angiogenetic factor VEGF represents a prognostic factor important for OS. CEA represents a parameter which is related to disease progression. Interleukins seem to be prospective complementary tumor marker. Adiponectin may be used for estimation of advanced stage of cancer and for estimate of risk of cancer recurrence.

During the past years, many new tests have been developed and introduced for experimental practice for early detection of CRC. But only few have been used for routine clinical practice to date. Knowledge about the biological activity of tumors could potentially help in the whole process from cancer prevention, through primary diagnosis to cancer therapy. It could help to individualize therapy choice at the time of primary diagnosis. This would enable the optimal health care of the cancer patient. Using the knowledge of the biological activity of tumor in clinical practice should help to restore the natural balance between the stimulatory and inhibitory growth factors.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by grants MZOVFN2005 and VZ MSM 0021620819.

  • Received July 1, 2010.
  • Revision received December 21, 2010.
  • Accepted December 22, 2010.
  • Copyright© 2011 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Boyle P,
    2. Leon ME
    : Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Br Med Bull 64: 1-25, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. La Vecchia C,
    2. Llucchini F,
    3. Negri E,
    4. Boyle P,
    5. Maisonnevue P,
    6. Levi F
    : Trends in cancer mortality in Europe. Eur J Cancer 28: 132-235, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Pecen L,
    2. Topolcan O,
    3. Koukalova H,
    4. Novak J,
    5. Siroky P,
    6. Rousarova M,
    7. Holubec L Jr..,
    8. Pikner R,
    9. Svobodova S
    : Epidemiology of colorectal carcinoma in the Czech Republic. J Tumor Marker Oncol 15(1): 55-56, 2000.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Ghesani M,
    2. Belgraier A,
    3. Hasni S
    : Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) scan in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal carcinoma in a patient with increasing CEA levels and inconclusive computed tomographic findings. Clin Nucl Med 28(7): 608-609, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Vogelstein B,
    2. Fearon ER,
    3. Hamilton SR,
    4. Kern SE,
    5. Presinger AC,
    6. Leppert M,
    7. Nakamura Y,
    8. White R,
    9. Smits AM,
    10. Bos JL
    : Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319: 525-532, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Union Internationale Contre la Cancer
    : TMN Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 65-69, 1997.
  7. ↵
    1. Hundt S,
    2. Haug U,
    3. Brenner H
    : Blood markers for early detection of colorectal cancer: a systemic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16(10): 1935-1953, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Holten Andersen MN,
    2. Christensen IJ,
    3. Nielsen HJ,
    4. Stephens RW,
    5. Jensen V,
    6. Nielsen OW,
    7. Soerensen S
    : Total levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in plasma yield high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in patients with colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res 8: 156-164, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Docherty AJ,
    2. Lyons A,
    3. Smith BJ,
    4. Wright EM,
    5. Stephens PE,
    6. Harris TJ,
    7. Murphy G,
    8. Reynolds JJ
    : Sequence of human tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases and its identity to erythroid-potentiating activity. Nature 318(6041): 66-69, 1985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hayakawa T,
    2. Yamashita K,
    3. Tanzawa K,
    4. Uchijima E,
    5. Iwata K
    : Growth-promoting activity of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) for wide range of cells. A possible growth factor in serum. FEBS Lett 298: 29-32, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Guedez L,
    2. Stetler-Stevenson WG,
    3. Wolff L,
    4. Wang J,
    5. Fukushima P,
    6. Mansoor A,
    7. Stetler-Stevenson M
    : In vitro suppression of programmed cell death of B-cells by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1. Clin Investig 102: 2002-2010, 1998.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Li G,
    2. Fridman R,
    3. Kim HR
    : Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 inhibits apoptosis of human breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res 59: 6267-6275, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Kaaks R,
    2. Toniolo P,
    3. Akhmedkhanov A,
    4. Lukanova A,
    5. Biessy C,
    6. Dechaud H,
    7. Rinaldi S
    : Serum C-peptide, IGF-1, IGF-binding proteins and colorectal cancer risk in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(19): 1592-1600, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Jenab M,
    2. Riboli E,
    3. Cleveland RJ,
    4. Norat T,
    5. Rinaldi S,
    6. Nieters A,
    7. Biessy C,
    8. Tjønneland A,
    9. Olsen A,
    10. Overvad K,
    11. Grønbaek H,
    12. Clavel-Chapelon F,
    13. Boutron-Ruault MC,
    14. Linseisen J,
    15. Boeing H,
    16. Pischon T,
    17. Trichopoulos D,
    18. Oikonomou E,
    19. Trichopoulou A,
    20. Panico S,
    21. Vineis P,
    22. Berrino F,
    23. Tumino R,
    24. Masala G,
    25. Peters PH,
    26. van Gils CH,
    27. Bueno-de-Mesquita HB,
    28. Ocké MC,
    29. Lund E,
    30. Mendez MA,
    31. Tormo MJ,
    32. Barricarte A,
    33. Martínez-García C,
    34. Dorronsoro M,
    35. Quirós JR,
    36. Hallmans G,
    37. Palmqvist R,
    38. Berglund G,
    39. Manjer J,
    40. Key T,
    41. Allen NE,
    42. Bingham S,
    43. Khaw KT,
    44. Cust A,
    45. Kaaks R
    : Serum C-peptide, IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 and risk of colon and rectal cancers in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Cancer 121(2): 368-376, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Wei EK,
    2. Giovannucci E,
    3. Fuchs CS,
    4. Willett WC,
    5. Mantzoros CS
    : Low plasma adiponectin levels and risk of colorectal cancer in men: a prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(22): 1688-1694, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Ferroni P,
    2. Palmirotta R,
    3. Spila A,
    4. Martini F,
    5. Raparelli V,
    6. Fossile E,
    7. Mariotti S,
    8. Del Monte G,
    9. Buonomo O,
    10. Roselli M,
    11. Guadagni F
    : Prognostic significance of adiponectin levels in non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 27(1B): 483-489, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Sugiyama M,
    2. Takahashi H,
    3. Hosono K,
    4. Endo H,
    5. Kato S,
    6. Yoneda K,
    7. Nozaki Y
    : Adiponectin inhibits colorectal cancer cell growth through the AMPK/mTOR pathway. Int J Oncol 34(2): 339-344, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Matsuda A,
    2. Matsutani Sasajima K,
    3. Furukawa K,
    4. Tajiri T,
    5. Tamura K,
    6. Kogo H
    : Preoperative plasma adiponectin level is a risk factor for postoperative infection following colorectal cancer surgery. J Surg Res 157(2): 227-234, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Duffy MJ,
    2. van Dalen A,
    3. Haglund C,
    4. Hansson L,
    5. Klapdor R,
    6. Lamerz R,
    7. Nilsson O,
    8. Sturgeon C,
    9. Topolcan O
    : Clinical utility of biochemical markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines. Eur J Cancer 39(6): 718-727, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Duffy MJ,
    2. van Dalen A,
    3. Haglund C,
    4. Hansson L,
    5. Holinski-Feder E,
    6. Klapdor R,
    7. Lamerz R,
    8. Peltomaki P,
    9. Sturgeon C,
    10. Topolcan O
    : Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use. Eur J Cancer 43(9): 1348-1360, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Vrzalova J,
    2. Prazakova M,
    3. Novotny Z,
    4. Topolcan O,
    5. Casova M,
    6. Holubec L Jr..
    : Test of ovarian cancer multiplex xMAP technology panel. Anticancer Res 29(2): 573-576, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Risk MC,
    2. Lin DW
    : New and novel markers for prostate cancer detection. Curr Urol Rep 10(3): 179-186, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Kim BK,
    2. Lee JW,
    3. Park PJ,
    4. Shin YS,
    5. Lee WY,
    6. Lee KA,
    7. Ye S,
    8. Hyun H,
    9. Kang KN,
    10. Yeo D,
    11. Kim Y,
    12. Ohn SY,
    13. Noh DY,
    14. Kim CW
    : The multiplex bead array approach to identifying serum biomarkers associated with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 11(2): R22, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 31 (1)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 31, Issue 1
January 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Parameters of Biological Activity in Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Parameters of Biological Activity in Colorectal Cancer
SARKA SVOBODOVA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, LUBOS HOLUBEC, MIROSLAV LEVY, LADISLAV PECEN, STEPAN SVACINA
Anticancer Research Jan 2011, 31 (1) 373-378;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Parameters of Biological Activity in Colorectal Cancer
SARKA SVOBODOVA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, LUBOS HOLUBEC, MIROSLAV LEVY, LADISLAV PECEN, STEPAN SVACINA
Anticancer Research Jan 2011, 31 (1) 373-378;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Republished: Obesity and colorectal cancer
  • Obesity and colorectal cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Appendectomy Mitigates Ulcerative Colitis Activity and Delays Colorectal Cancer Onset: A Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Role of Stromal CD25+/CD8+ Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Grade 2-3 Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2-3): A Retrospective Single-center Study
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-induced Uveitis: Disproportionality and Timing Analyses of the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire